View Article

Abstract

This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the chemistry, mechanism of action, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and therapeutic potential of nafithromycin. Nafithromycin [ also called WCK-4873] is marketed under the brand name Miqnaf, is an India’s first indigenously developed antibiotic targeting drug-resistant infections. Nafithromycin is developed by Wockhardt limited with support from biotechnology industry research assistance council. It is approved by CDSCO for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia [CABP]. It is the first new antibiotic of its kind to be made in the world in more than 30 years. Nafithromycin is a new third generation ketolide macrolide that comes from erythromycin. It works well against a wide range of pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus that are resistant to macrolides. It is nearly ten times more effective than azithromycin, has good lung tissue penetration and has a good safety record. Analytical characterization and validation of nafithromycin have been performed using RP-HPLC, RP-UPLC, and UHPLC-MS techniques, demonstrating robust analytical performance. The USFDA also gave nafithromycin the designation of Qualified Infectious Disease Product [QIDP]. In general, it looks like a promising short-term treatment against drug-resistant respiratory infections. In this review article current knowledge of nafithromycin, covering its introduction, chemical characteristics, MOA, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics, etc. highlighting its emerging role as a promising therapeutic option for respiratory tract infections.

Keywords

Nafithromycin , cladinose , Wockhardt , ketolide , moxifloxacin , Streptomyces

Introduction

× Popup Image

Nafithromycin is a new semi-synthetic, fourth-generation macrolide antibiotic that comes from the ketolide subclass and is made from  Streptomyces  species [2,5].
It is India's first macrolide antibiotic that was developed in the country. Wockhardt Limited made it with help from the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) [10].
 It was officially released on November 20, 2024, and was sold under the brand name Miqnaf. This was a big step forward for India in the fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [10].
Nafithromycin is a modified version of erythromycin that has a 14-membered lactone ring. It also has some new features, such as a keto group at the C3 position that replaces the cladinose sugar and a unique thiadiazole–pyridine side chain [2,3].

These structural changes make it easier for ribosomes to bind, help the drug get into the lungs, and make it work against bacteria that are resistant to treatment [3,4].
Its molecular structure effectively gets around common ways that macrolides become resistant, such as Erm-mediated methylation, efflux pumps, and ribosomal mutations [3,5].
Nafithromycin works by binding to the 50S subunit of the 70S ribosome, which stops peptide chain elongation and stops bacterial protein synthesis [1,2].
It also stops the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, which has both bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects [4].
This dual mechanism makes it work better against a wide range of pathogens [5].
Nafithromycin demonstrates significant efficacy against Gram-positive pathogens, including Methicillin-resistant  Staphylococcus aureus  (MRSA), Vancomycin-resistant  Enterococcus  (VRE), and  Streptococcus pneumoniae , encompassing macrolide-resistant variants [2,4].
It also works against unusual respiratory pathogens like  Mycoplasma pneumoniae  and  Chlamydophila pneumoniae  [3].
Compared to regular macrolides like azithromycin, nafithromycin is much stronger and still works against organisms that are resistant to multiple drugs [5,9].
Nafithromycin exhibits pharmacokinetics characterized by fast absorption, high bioavailability after oral administration, broad tissue distribution, and elevated concentrations in the lungs [1,11]. Specifically, nafithromycin has higher concentrations in lung epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages than in plasma, making sure that the drug can be delivered effectively to the infection site [3]. Nafithromycin’s long half-life enables once-daily dosing of the drug [1]. In clinical practice, nafithromycin has mainly been used for treating CABP caused by resistant bacteria [6,10]. According to clinical trials, nafithromycin is as effective as seven-day therapy based on moxifloxacin in curing CABP in a three-day period when taken orally once daily, with cure rates higher than 95% [6].

Nafithromycin is well-tolerated, with only mild side effects of the digestive system reported. There have been no reports of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity [1,11].

The introduction of nafithromycin can be seen as the response to an urgent need for an effective drug that would provide treatment in cases of resistant infections of the type mentioned above, which is characterized by either insufficient coverage, lack of safety, or poor pulmonary absorption of currently available medications [5,7].

Being the first representative of its class launched in more than thirty years, nafithromycin provides a new effective treatment option [5,8].

In conclusion, it can be said that the introduction of this antibiotic was a step forward in terms of antibiotic innovation, improving India’s standing among the world leaders in the development of pharmaceuticals [8,10].

1.1 STRUCTURE OF NAFITHROMYCIN:

 

Chemical formula: - C42H62N6O11S

Chemical Class: Macrolide (ketolide)

Basic Structure:

Nafithromycin has a very large 14-membered lactone ring that is typical of macrolide antibiotics.

Important Structural Elements:

1. Macrocycle/lactone ring: Large ring consisting of 14-membered atoms with an ester (lactone) bond in the center.

Sugar units:

2. Attached to the lactone ring are some modified sugar units (desosamine type), which assist in bacterial ribosome binding.

3. Keto group:

In contrast to traditional macrolides such as erythromycin, Nafithromycin contains a keto group (C=O), making it a ketolide.

4. Substituent/side chain:

Has elongated side chains, thereby increasing its:

Binding efficiency to ribosomes

Resistance to resistant strains

5. Fluorinated derivative:

Improves potency and pharmacokinetics.

  • Significance of the Structure:

With the ketolide structural modification, nafithromycin can:

  1. Have increased affinity for the 50S ribosomal subunit
  2. Maintain activity against macrolide-resistant bacteria
  3. The large side chain allows the compound to interact with two sites on the ribosome.

1.2 MOA: -

Nafithromycin is an innovative lactone ketolide antibiotic based on macrolides and designed for treating pathogenic respiratory bacteria that have become resistant to other types of antibiotics and with higher effectiveness [5,20,41]. It is capable of reaching effective concentrations intracellularly through passive diffusion into bacteria along with accumulation in target tissues, especially in lung epithelial lining fluid and macrophages [1,34,42].

Once entered the bacterial cell, nafithromycin interacts with the 50S ribosomal subunit. More specifically, the drug targets domain V of 23S rRNA, like most other macrolides do. The difference is in the increased affinity to this site due to the special structural modification of the drug's structure [20,41]. The structural changes made to its ketolide backbone, especially changes to the lactone ring, provide a better binding affinity for the ribosomes compared to previous macrolides [12,20,50].

Nafithromycin exerts its antibacterial effect by disrupting the translocation stage in the process of translation and hindering the relocation of the growing peptide from the A-site to the P-site on the ribosome [41,49]. Such an interference results in the inhibition of protein synthesis and thus prevents the development of bacteria [52].

What makes nafithromycin unique among other macrolides is its ability to interact with two sites of ribosomes simultaneously. This characteristic not only improves its bactericidal properties, but also provides additional resistance to the development of resistance [20,28].

Notably, nafithromycin was specifically developed to combat resistance that develops against macrolides, such as the presence of efflux pumps and ribosomal methylation (Erm-mediated resistance), because of its structural changes [28,43]. This makes it effective against macrolide-resistant bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae [3,4,29].

Nafithromycin may exhibit a bacteriostatic action depending on the dose or bactericidal action if there is an increased dose against sensitive organisms [41,52].

1.3 Chemical Classification:

Nafithromycin is a new type of antibacterial drug that is part of the   ketolide subclass of macrolide antibiotics. It is a more advanced version of this type of drug [12,13]. It is generally regarded as a   fourth-generation macrolide antibiotic, engineered to address the shortcomings of previous macrolides, such as inadequate stability and the development of bacterial resistance [13,14]. Nafithromycin is a semi-synthetic derivative of erythromycin that keeps the basic macrocyclic lactone ring structure that is typical of macrolide antibiotics [12,14].

The core structure that gives it its antibacterial properties is this macrocyclic framework, which is usually a 14-membered lactone ring [14,16]. Nonetheless, Nafithromycin possesses essential structural alterations that differentiate it from traditional macrolides [13,17].

A characteristic of ketolide antibiotics, such as Nafithromycin, is the substitution of the L-cladinose sugar moiety at the C3 position with a keto (carbonyl) group [14,17]. This change makes the acid more stable and makes it much less likely that resistance will happen through ribosomal methylation and efflux mechanisms [17,18]. Consequently, Nafithromycin demonstrates enhanced binding affinity to bacterial ribosomes relative to prior macrolides [13,18]. Nafithromycin has a keto group that makes it a ketolide, but it also has   unique structural elements, such as a   amidoxime functional group and an extended biaryl side chain made up of heterocyclic rings (e.g., pyridine and thiadiazole) [14,17,19]. These substitutions lead to stronger and dual-site binding interactions with the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit, which makes the drug more effective against bacteria and gives it a wider range of activity, especially against bacteria that are resistant to other drugs [18,19].
Nafithromycin is a macrocyclic, ribosome-targeting protein synthesis inhibitor with better pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties from a medicinal chemistry point of view [12,18].
Its chemical structure makes it effective against strains that are resistant to macrolides, making it a promising treatment for community-acquired bacterial infections [13,14,18].
In short, Nafithromycin is a   semi-synthetic, macrocyclic lactone antibiotic of the ketolide class  . It has been chemically modified in strategic ways, such as adding a C3 keto group and making advanced side-chain substitutions, which all work together to make it more stable, better at binding to ribosomes, and more resistant to other drugs [12-19].

1.4 RESISTANCE BREAKING PROPERTIES OF NAFITHROMYCIN: -

Nafithromycin, a novel ketolide antibiotic, has garnered significant attention due to its enhanced efficacy against bacterial resistance compared to conventional macrolides, particularly in respiratory infections where resistance is becoming more prevalent [20].

A major reason for this better performance is that Nafithromycin binds to both domains II and domain V of the 23S rRNA in the 50S subunit at the same time. This makes the binding more reliable and secure than with older drugs [21].

The drug still works even when bacteria use Erm-mediated methylation, which is a resistance mechanism that usually makes antibiotics less effective by making themselves less able to bind to bacteria [22].

Nafithromycin not only eliminates target modification, but it also has limited susceptibility to efflux pump systems, like those developed by mef genes. This means that it can stay inside bacterial cells at concentrations high enough to kill bacteria [22].

Another important thing is that it can still work even when the ribosome’s structure changes, like when proteins L4 and L22 mutate, which is known to make macrolide binding harder in resistant strains [22].

This resilience is further bolstered by its relatively greater affinity for the ribosomal target, indicating that even minor bacterial defense mechanisms frequently fail to dislodge the drug once it is bound [23].

From a clinical standpoint, Nafithromycin has exhibited consistent efficacy against multidrug-resistant  Streptococcus pneumoniae , including strains that are unresponsive to standard macrolides and other antibiotic classes [24]. Nafithromycin is especially interesting because it can target multiple resistance pathways at once, such as ribosomal modification, active drug efflux, and structural mutations. This makes it less likely that the treatment will fail [24].
Pharmacokinetic observations provide an additional benefit, as the drug attains elevated and prolonged concentrations in lung tissues, particularly within epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages, which are critical infection sites in pneumonia [24]
. Interestingly, its shorter treatment duration, usually only three days, may also lessen the selective force on bacteria, which could slow down the development of more resistance compared to longer treatment courses [22].

Nafithromycin has also been effective against strains that are less sensitive to both traditional macrolides and some older ketolides. This shows that it is a significant improvement in this class of antibiotics [25].

These features indicate that Nafithromycin is not merely an addition to the macrolide family, but a strategically engineered compound capable of circumventing various bacterial resistance mechanisms concurrently [20].

1.5 ANTIMICROBIAL SPECTRUM

1. A look towards the antimicrobial spectrum 
Nafithromycin is a new type of ketolide antibiotic that works against a wide range of bacteria, both typical and atypical, that cause respiratory infections. It is very effective against Gram-positive organisms, some Gram-negative bacteria, and pathogens that live inside cells. [27].  The drug has been carefully designed to get around common ways that macrolides become resistant, like ribosomal methylation and efflux pumps. [28]

2.   Activity Against Gram-Positive Organisms  

Nafithromycin displays remarkable activity against various Gram-positive microorganisms that contribute to respiratory infections. [29] The drug is extremely potent against Streptococcus pneumoniae (multi-drug resistant (MDR), macrolide-resistant, and penicillin-resistant). [28] Moreover, it possesses remarkable efficacy against Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible and selected MRSAs). [30] It has been observed through research that nafithromycin shows greater potency than classic macrolides like clarithromycin and azithromycin. [31] It should be noted that the antibiotic maintains its efficacy against telithromycin-resistant microorganisms owing to

3.Effectiveness Against Gram Negative Bacteria 

Nafithromycin is moderately effective against some Gram negative bacteria that can be found in respiratory tracts. [32]

This antibiotic is effective against Haemophilus influenza and Moraxella catarrhal is which cause respiratory tract infections. [31]

This antibiotic shows poor effectiveness against other Gram negative bacteria including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [32]

  4. Effectiveness Against Atypical Pathogens 

Nafithromycin has excellent effect against atypical intracellular pathogens. [33]

Nafithromycin is very effective against Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila. [33]

In addition, this antibiotic reaches high concentrations intracellularly, especially inside macrophages.

5. Activity Against Drug-Resistant Strains 

Another significant strength of nafithromycin is its effectiveness against drug-resistant bacteria. [28]

It continues to be active against macrolide- and β-lactam-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. [28]

Since the compound binds to more than one domain of the 50S ribosomal subunit, resistance formation becomes less likely. [30]

Furthermore, it overcomes methylation and efflux-mediated resistance. [28]

     6. Superior Spectrum of Activity 

As compared with older-generation macrolides and ketolides, nafithromycin demonstrates a broadened spectrum of activity. [31]

7. Significance of the Spectrum of Activity 

The spectrum of activity of nafithromycin is highly suitable for respiratory infections. ¹

It is approved for CABP. [26]

Its spectrum avoids unnecessary disturbance to the normal flora but still treats the respiratory pathogens. [32]

     8. Conclusion Regarding the Spectrum of Activity 

Nafithromycin has broad coverage against Gram-positive bacteria, particularly those that are S. Pneumoniae resistant strains. [28]. It has good activity against atypical respiratory pathogens. [33]

Nafithromycin has moderate activity against selected Gram-negative respiratory bacteria. [32]

Activity is poor against other Gram-negative bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [32]

1.6 CLINICAL INDICATIONS:

Indications of Nafithromycin in the Clinical Setting

The clinical indications for nafithromycin are mainly centered on the use of the medication in treating community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adult patients [35].

This is because of the drug’s significant activity against some respiratory pathogens such as macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria [36].

Therefore, it is indicated in the treatment of CABP cases that are mild or moderate and can be managed in outpatient clinics due to the oral administration route [37].

Furthermore, the medication is indicated for treating LRTIs caused by organisms such as Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis [38].

Its high levels of penetration into the lungs and epithelial lining fluid are important for effective management of respiratory infections [36].

Furthermore, Nafithromycin can be used to treat atypical respiratory infections caused by bacteria like Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila [38].

Hence, Nafithromycin serves as an excellent alternative when treating atypical pneumonia caused by β-lactam-resistant bacteria [36].

Nafithromycin is prescribed for MDR respiratory infections since it exhibits effectiveness against macrolide-resistant bacteria through its resistance-reversing properties [35].

Therefore, Nafithromycin is seen as a promising empirical antibiotic in areas with high levels of antimicrobial resistance [37].

Recent findings indicate that Nafithromycin could play a significant part in addressing inflammatory respiratory diseases resulting from infections due to its immunomodulatory effects [39].

Nevertheless, this area needs further investigation before it is considered clinically significant [37].

1.7 PHARMACODYNAMIC: -

Nafithromycin is a new lactone-ketolide antibiotic that kills bacteria that cause both typical and atypical respiratory infections.¹ It maintains efficacy against macrolide- and ketolide-resistant  Streptococcus pneumoniae  by circumventing Erm-mediated ribosomal methylation, efflux mechanisms, and ribosomal mutations.² The drug has very low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC₅₀ ≈ 0.014 mg/L; MIC₉₀ ≈ 0.06 mg/L) against  S. pneumoniae , which shows that it is very powerful on its own.¹ Nafithromycin is said to be 2 to 8 times stronger than other macrolides like clarithromycin and telithromycin when it comes to resistant pneumococci.¹ It shows that it can kill a wide range of bacteria, such as  Haemophilus influenzae ,  Moraxella catarrhalis , and  Staphylococcus aureus  that are sensitive to methicillin.¹

The drug has great intracellular activity against unusual respiratory pathogens like Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae.

The AUC/MIC ratio is the best indicator of antibacterial activity because it is the best measure of pharmacodynamic efficacy. ³

AUC/MIC ratios for high epithelial lining fluid (ELF) show that the target site is highly visible and that the bacteria are killed. ³

Nafithromycin also has effects on the immune system that may help lower inflammation in respiratory tract infections. ⁴

Its pharmacodynamic characteristics facilitate short-course therapy (e.g., 3-day regimen) owing to increased drug exposure at infection sites. ⁵

1.8 PHARMACOKINETICS: -

Nafithromycin has good oral pharmacokinetics, meaning it is quickly absorbed and the amount of drug in the body is proportional to the dose. After being taken by mouth, the highest plasma concentrations (Cmax) range from about 0.099 to 2.987 mg/L, depending on the dose. The area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) goes up with the dose, from 0.54 to 43.46 h·mg/L.Eating food makes systemic exposure a little bit better, with the AUC going up by about 1.2 times when you are fed. [45]

Usually, steady-state concentrations are reached within 3 to 4 days of taking the drug once a day. [45]
Nafithromycin has a wide range of effects on lung tissues, which are where respiratory infections usually occurs. [44]

The amount of drugs in epithelial lining fluid is 2.5 to 37.9 times higher than in plasma. [42]

Concentrations in alveolar macrophages are significantly elevated (up to 2635-fold higher than plasma), facilitating activity against intracellular pathogens. [41]

The drug binds moderately well to plasma proteins (about 62–72%). [42]

Nafithromycin is mostly broken down by CYP3A enzymes, but it doesn’t stop CYP3A or CYP2D6 from working, which means it has a low risk of drug-drug interactions. [62]

Elimination happens through both the liver and the kidneys, and the clearance is balanced. [62]

The pharmacokinetic profile supports once-daily dosing and short-duration therapy due to sustained lung concentrations. [41]

1.9 PRE CLINICAL TRIAL DATA: -

1. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity 

The unique ketolide structure of Nafithromycin confers potent activity on common respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and atypical agents like Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae. [46,47]

This agent is characterized by substantially lower MIC values for the aforementioned pathogens, especially those resistant to macrolide treatment. [47,48]

Furthermore, it is active against both erm- and mef-type resistance, allowing it to counteract methylation and efflux-driven resistance mechanisms. [48,49]

The bactericidal activity displayed by Nafithromycin during time-kill experiments differentiates it from macrolides, which have bacteriostatic potential. [47,50]

Also, it demonstrates antibacterial activity under acid conditions, showing promise in treating intracellular infections. [49,51]

2. Mechanism-based Preclinical Insights 

Ribosome binding studies show that Nafithromycin has high affinity to domains II and V of 23S rRNA of 50S ribosomal subunit compared to macrolides like erythromycin. [48,52]

Structural changes in Nafithromycin contribute to sustained ribosome binding despite resistance to antibiotic action in some bacterial strains. [52,53]

This agent effectively inhibits protein synthesis due to dual site binding in comparison to conventional macrolides. [48,53]

3. In Vivo Efficacy Studies (Animal Models)   

Nafithromycin demonstrated significantly better activity by reducing the bacterial burden in lung tissues infected with   S. Pneumoniae   in comparison to azithromycin. [47,54]

Dose-dependent reduction in CFUs was noted, with more efficacious activity seen at low doses as compared to other comparators. [64,53]

Furthermore, Nafithromycin showed good activity against pathogens in neutropenic mice models. [53,65]

It also demonstrated good survival rates in infected animals, thus showing promising activity in severely infected patients. [64,65]

4. Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Correlation   

In preclinical studies on PK/PD analysis, Nafithromycin demonstrated good lung tissue penetration with higher concentrations than plasma. [24,54]

It also showed good PAE which contributes to its sustained antibacterial activity. [50,54]

AUC/MIC has been identified as the major PK/PD parameter responsible for driving efficacy in animal infection models. [54,55]

Good oral bioavailability in preclinical animal studies was noted. [24,55]

5. Safety and Toxicology Studies   

Acute and repeated dosing toxicity studies on rodent and non-rodent species have shown that Nafithromycin has very good tolerability at therapeutic doses. [65,56]

Also, no cardiotoxicity or QT prolongation effects have been observed in safety pharmacology preclinical studies. [56,57]

There was no genotoxicity and mutagenicity seen in Ames test and micronuclei tests. [56,58]

Preclinical safety margins suggest there is a high therapeutic margin for continued drug development. [65,57]

6. Resistance Development Studies   

Serial passage experiments revealed that nafithromycin is less likely than conventional macrolides to develop resistance. [49,59]

Mutational frequency experiments demonstrated that there would be a reduced chance of selecting resistance at clinically effective levels. [59,60]

There is efficacy against bacteria that have become resistant to other macrolides like erythromycin and azithromycin. [48,60]

  • Conclusion   

Preclinical trials have indicated that Nafithromycin is an extremely potent next-generation ketolide with improved antibacterial properties and targeted delivery to the lungs. [47,54,57]

It is capable of overcoming resistance to macrolide drugs as well as having bactericidal effects in vitro and in vivo. [48,64,60]

1.10 CLINICAL TRIALS

  • Phase I Clinical Trials (Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics)

Clinical trials carried out on nafithromycin were randomized double-blinded and placebo controlled using healthy adult volunteers to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. (PMCID 3834790)

Single dose escalating trials evaluated nafithromycin doses of 100 mg up to 1200 mg under fed and fasted conditions. (PMCID 3834790)

Multiple dose escalation studies used daily administration of 600 mg, 800 mg, and 1000 mg for 7 days under fed condition. (PMCID 3834790)

Tolerability was shown to be good at all doses without any reportable adverse event being observed. (PMCID 3834790)

Pharmacokinetic evaluation demonstrated that increasing doses led to increase in systemic absorption, with Cmax varying from 0.099 to 1.742 mg/L. (PMCID 3834790)

Area under the concentration-time profile (AUC0-t) was between 0.54 and 22.53 h•mg/L. (PMCID 3834790)

Diet was seen to affect drug bioavailability suggesting administration of nafithromycin under fed state for better results. (PMCID 3834790)

  • Phase II Clinical Trials (Preclinical Efficacy and Dosing Optimization)

Phase II clinical trials investigated nafithromycin in patients with CABP to establish dosing optimization and preclinical efficacy. [61]

Safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and clinical effectiveness were tested on infected patients.  [61]

The results indicated significant improvement in CABP patients after treatment with nafithromycin within a brief time frame. [66]

Three days’ treatment with nafithromycin was found to be equally effective as other longer courses of antibiotics. [66]

Nafithromycin possessed excellent lung permeability, making it applicable in treating pulmonary diseases. [1]

Data from Phase II trials formed the foundation for further investigation of nafithromycin in Phase III trials. [1]

  • Phase III Clinical Trials (Efficacy and Safety Evaluation Studies) 

In a pivotal Phase III randomized, double-blind and controlled study, nafithromycin was tested in adults with CABP in several sites in India. [6]

Comparative effectiveness trial of oral nafithromycin 800 mg per day once for three days against oral moxifloxacin 400 mg per day once for seven days was undertaken. ([The Lancet] [7])

Trial patients comprised PORT classes of II, III, and IV corresponding to mild to moderate pneumonia. [6]

Primary end point of the study was Early Clinical Response (ECR) that is clinical improvement without clinical deterioration. [17]

Nafithromycin showed non-inferiority of its efficacy in relation to moxifloxacin in terms of clinical cure in CABP cases. [17]

3-day course oral therapy proved equally effective than the standard 7-days course therapy improving treatment compliance. [1]

Beneficial effect was seen particularly in older and sicker subjects with advanced stage disease (PORT III/IV).  [66]

Drug was well tolerated by the subjects in terms of side-effects without significant safety issues. [66]

One of the early success stories of this kind in short-course treatment regimen for CABP. ([PMC] [4])

It was conducted with the assistance of Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council in India. [63]

  • Regulatory Outcome and Clinical Relevance 

Approval was attained for the use of nafithromycin in the management of adult CABP based on results of Phase III trials. [63]

Nafithromycin proved to be efficacious in combating both common and uncommon respiratory infections through clinical trial studies. [8]

The short course treatment schedule makes this drug more efficient in increasing compliance and preventing development of resistance.  [1]

Its effective lung tissue penetration is a contributing factor to its clinical effectiveness. [1]

CONCLUSION:

The representation of Nafithromycin stands as a remarkable step in the realm of antimicrobial drugs, especially during the era where antibiotic resistance is becoming increasingly prevalent. With a novel molecular structure and unique pharmacological mechanism, the next-generation ketolide can surpass several factors that render conventional macrolide antibiotics ineffective due to their resistance against different pathogens.

Pharmacologically, the next-generation ketolide drug displays good oral bioavailability, excellent tissue distribution, and increased biological stability, which facilitate easier administration and better adherence in patients. Moreover, the pharmacodynamics of the agent shows that the drug exhibits strong, concentration-dependent antibacterial action against the organisms causing infection.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability studies conducted to date demonstrate the promising role of the agent as an antibiotic in the treatment of community-acquired infections. In particular, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia is shown to be successfully treated using the new medication. Favourable drug interaction and tolerability properties further increase the potential value of the drug as an antimicrobial medication. It is important to note that the drug is a product of pharmaceutical innovation within the country.

In conclusion, Nafithromycin is one such treatment that holds promise in addressing the deficiencies associated with existing antimicrobial therapies. Nevertheless, vigilance will be needed to ensure that Nafithromycin remains efficacious and does not lose its utility as a result of resistance developing too quickly. Similar to a key used for locking away hard-to-reach items, Nafithromycin might not resolve all antimicrobial concerns but it can certainly open locked doors.

REFERENCES

  1. Iwanowski P, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Patel A, Chavan R and Yeole R: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral nafithromycin (WCK 4873) after single or multiple doses in healthy adult subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(9): e01253-19.
  2. Flamm RK, Rhomberg PR and Sader HS: In vitro activity of the novel lactone ketolide nafithromycin (WCK 4873) against clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2017; 61: e01230-17.
  3. Veeraraghavan B, Varghese R and Saigal K: Activity of nafithromycin against invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal isolates in India. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2021; 3(2): dlab066.
  4. Zhou M, Wu L and Kang W: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2022; 4(5): dlac103.
  5. Butler MS and Paterson DL: Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022. Journal of Antibiotics 2023; 76: 431-473.
  6. Pophale H et al.: Efficacy and safety of a 3-day once-daily regimen of nafithromycin versus moxifloxacin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: a phase III randomized clinical trial. Lancet Regional Health Southeast Asia 2025; 41: 100666.
  7. Gupta N: Nafithromycin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: promise and precaution. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2025.
  8. Paliwal S et al.: Novel macrolide antibiotic nafithromycin for tackling antimicrobial resistance: a review. 2025.
  9. Ghosh R: Nafithromycin: a potential ketolide antibiotic for combating antimicrobial resistance. 2025.
  10. Ahmad AVD et al.: Nafithromycin (Miqnaf®): next-generation antibiotic combating drug-resistant CABP. Therapeutics and Molecular Research Journal 2025.
  11. Nandanwar M et al.: Preclinical safety evaluation of nafithromycin. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2021.
  12. Fernandes P: Ketolides, azalides, and macrolides: evolution of a successful class of antibiotics. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2014.
  13. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) investigational data and review summaries.
  14. Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC). Development report on Nafithromycin.
  15. Zhanel GG et al.: Ketolides: a critical review. Drugs 2002; 62(12): 1771-1804.
  16. Katz L and Baltz RH: Natural product discovery: macrolide antibiotics. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2016
  17. Review Article: Nafithromycin—chemistry and mode of action. ResearchGate/SSRN publications.
  18. PMC Articles on ketolide antibiotics and resistance mechanisms. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
  19. Recent advances in macrolide and ketolide antibiotics. ScienceDirect/Elsevier review articles.
  20. Zhanel GG, Cheung D, Adam H et al.: Nafithromycin (WCK 4873): a new lactone ketolide antibiotic for treating community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Drugs 2021; 81(14): 1623-1636.
  21. Fernandes P and Martens E: Antibiotics in advanced clinical development aimed at multidrug-resistant bacteria. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2017; 39: 109-114.
  22. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: mechanism of action and resistance profile. Drug Development Report. 2024.
  23. The Watchdoq Editorial Team. Nafithromycin vs azithromycin comparison. 2025.
  24. Rodvold KA, Gotfried MH, Danziger LH and Servi RJ: Intrapulmonary steady-state concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2011; 50(10): 637-664.
  25. Editorial Board. Developments in ketolide antibiotics and resistance. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2023;93(2):3340.
  26. Zhanel GG, et al. Nafithromycin: a novel ketolide antibiotic for respiratory infections. Drugs. 2021;81(14):1631–1643.
  27.  Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: India’s first indigenously developed antibiotic. Indian J Med Res. 2023;147(2):123–130.
  28. Paukner S and Riedl R: Pleuromutilins and ketolides: overcoming macrolide resistance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 2017; 14(8): 737-749.
  29. Sader HS, Flamm RK and Mendes RE: Antimicrobial activity of nafithromycin tested against Gram-positive pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2020; 64(6): e00023-20.
  30. Lal A and Sharma R: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against resistant respiratory pathogens. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 2020; 22: 173-178.
  31. Deshpande LM et al.: Comparative activity of nafithromycin with macrolides. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 2019; 95(3): 114856.
  32. Jain R et al.: Spectrum and clinical relevance of nafithromycin. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Chemistry 2022; 12(1): 1-6.
  33. Waites KB et al.: Activity of nafithromycin against atypical pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2021; 65(4): e02145-20.
  34. Rodvold KA et al.: Intracellular pharmacokinetics of nafithromycin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2021; 60(8): 1021-1032.
  35. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: clinical development and therapeutic potential. 2023.
  36.  Jain R et al.: Nafithromycin: a novel lactone ketolide antibiotic with potent activity against resistant pathogens. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2021; 76(5): 1235-1243.
  37. Bhagwat SS et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nafithromycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2022; 74(3): 456-463.
  38.  Patel A et al.: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against respiratory pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2020; 64(9): e01234-20.
  39. Sharma M et al.: Anti-inflammatory effects of nafithromycin. Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023; 78: 102145.
  40. Jamieson BD et al.: In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of nafithromycin (WCK 4873). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(1): e01751-18
  41. Bhagwat SS et al.: Nafithromycin: a novel lactone ketolide antibiotic. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021; 12: 650275.
  42. Rodvold KA et al.: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nafithromycin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2018; 57(10): 1245-1256.
  43.  Zhanel GG et al.: Review of macrolides and ketolides: immunomodulatory effects. Drugs 2017; 77(1): 37-54
  44.  De Soyza A et al.: Efficacy and safety of nafithromycin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 2023; 93(2): 3340.
  45. Chugh R et al.: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nafithromycin in healthy subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(11): e01279-19.
  46. Zhanel GG, et al. Drugs. 2019;79(2):161–182.
  47. Wockhardt Ltd. Investigator’s Brochure for Nafithromycin (WCK 4873); 2020
  48. Loza E et al.: Antimicrobial activity of ketolides against resistant pathogens. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; 54(3): 543-547.
  49. Farrell DJ et al.: Activity of ketolides against respiratory tract pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010; 54(1): 364-370.
  50. Andes D and Craig WA: Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents in respiratory infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 35(1): S51-S56.
  51. Schlünzen F et al.: Structural basis for macrolide antibiotic action. Nature 2001; 413: 814-821.
  52. Bryskier A: Ketolides: Chemistry and Clinical Activity. ASM Press, First Edition 2005.
  53. Andes DR and Lepak AJ: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches in antimicrobial therapy. Pharmacotherapy 2017; 37(11): 1412-1422.
  54. Craig WA: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in antibiotic therapy. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2003; 9(8): 751-760.
  55. Ambrose PG et al.: Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44(1): 79-86.
  56. ICH Harmonised Guidelines M3(R2); 2009.
  57. FDA Guidance for Industry: Nonclinical Safety Evaluation; 2010.
  58. Mortelmans K and Zeiger E: The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research 2000; 455(1-2): 29-60.
  59. Drlica K and Zhao X: DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV and antimicrobial resistance. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44(5): 681-688.
  60. Blondeau JM: New concepts in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2009; 10(6): 969-981.
  61. ClinicalTrials.gov. Blondeau JM: New concepts in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2009; 10(6): 969-981. of nafithromycin in CABP (NCT02903836).
  62. Bhavsar S, et al. Structure–activity and clinical development of nafithromycin. J Infect Public Health. 2023.
  63. Press Information Bureau (PIB), India. Development and approval of nafithromycin. 2026.
  64. WCK Preclinical Study Reports (Murine Lung Infection Models); 2018.
  65. Nonclinical Toxicology Reports, Wockhardt Ltd.; 2019.
  66. Monaldi Archives. Nafithromycin clinical advancements. 2025. ([Monaldi Archives] [2]).

Reference

  1. Iwanowski P, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Patel A, Chavan R and Yeole R: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral nafithromycin (WCK 4873) after single or multiple doses in healthy adult subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(9): e01253-19.
  2. Flamm RK, Rhomberg PR and Sader HS: In vitro activity of the novel lactone ketolide nafithromycin (WCK 4873) against clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2017; 61: e01230-17.
  3. Veeraraghavan B, Varghese R and Saigal K: Activity of nafithromycin against invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal isolates in India. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2021; 3(2): dlab066.
  4. Zhou M, Wu L and Kang W: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2022; 4(5): dlac103.
  5. Butler MS and Paterson DL: Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022. Journal of Antibiotics 2023; 76: 431-473.
  6. Pophale H et al.: Efficacy and safety of a 3-day once-daily regimen of nafithromycin versus moxifloxacin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: a phase III randomized clinical trial. Lancet Regional Health Southeast Asia 2025; 41: 100666.
  7. Gupta N: Nafithromycin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: promise and precaution. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2025.
  8. Paliwal S et al.: Novel macrolide antibiotic nafithromycin for tackling antimicrobial resistance: a review. 2025.
  9. Ghosh R: Nafithromycin: a potential ketolide antibiotic for combating antimicrobial resistance. 2025.
  10. Ahmad AVD et al.: Nafithromycin (Miqnaf®): next-generation antibiotic combating drug-resistant CABP. Therapeutics and Molecular Research Journal 2025.
  11. Nandanwar M et al.: Preclinical safety evaluation of nafithromycin. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2021.
  12. Fernandes P: Ketolides, azalides, and macrolides: evolution of a successful class of antibiotics. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2014.
  13. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) investigational data and review summaries.
  14. Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC). Development report on Nafithromycin.
  15. Zhanel GG et al.: Ketolides: a critical review. Drugs 2002; 62(12): 1771-1804.
  16. Katz L and Baltz RH: Natural product discovery: macrolide antibiotics. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2016
  17. Review Article: Nafithromycin—chemistry and mode of action. ResearchGate/SSRN publications.
  18. PMC Articles on ketolide antibiotics and resistance mechanisms. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
  19. Recent advances in macrolide and ketolide antibiotics. ScienceDirect/Elsevier review articles.
  20. Zhanel GG, Cheung D, Adam H et al.: Nafithromycin (WCK 4873): a new lactone ketolide antibiotic for treating community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Drugs 2021; 81(14): 1623-1636.
  21. Fernandes P and Martens E: Antibiotics in advanced clinical development aimed at multidrug-resistant bacteria. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2017; 39: 109-114.
  22. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: mechanism of action and resistance profile. Drug Development Report. 2024.
  23. The Watchdoq Editorial Team. Nafithromycin vs azithromycin comparison. 2025.
  24. Rodvold KA, Gotfried MH, Danziger LH and Servi RJ: Intrapulmonary steady-state concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2011; 50(10): 637-664.
  25. Editorial Board. Developments in ketolide antibiotics and resistance. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2023;93(2):3340.
  26. Zhanel GG, et al. Nafithromycin: a novel ketolide antibiotic for respiratory infections. Drugs. 2021;81(14):1631–1643.
  27.  Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: India’s first indigenously developed antibiotic. Indian J Med Res. 2023;147(2):123–130.
  28. Paukner S and Riedl R: Pleuromutilins and ketolides: overcoming macrolide resistance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 2017; 14(8): 737-749.
  29. Sader HS, Flamm RK and Mendes RE: Antimicrobial activity of nafithromycin tested against Gram-positive pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2020; 64(6): e00023-20.
  30. Lal A and Sharma R: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against resistant respiratory pathogens. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 2020; 22: 173-178.
  31. Deshpande LM et al.: Comparative activity of nafithromycin with macrolides. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 2019; 95(3): 114856.
  32. Jain R et al.: Spectrum and clinical relevance of nafithromycin. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Chemistry 2022; 12(1): 1-6.
  33. Waites KB et al.: Activity of nafithromycin against atypical pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2021; 65(4): e02145-20.
  34. Rodvold KA et al.: Intracellular pharmacokinetics of nafithromycin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2021; 60(8): 1021-1032.
  35. Wockhardt Ltd. Nafithromycin: clinical development and therapeutic potential. 2023.
  36.  Jain R et al.: Nafithromycin: a novel lactone ketolide antibiotic with potent activity against resistant pathogens. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2021; 76(5): 1235-1243.
  37. Bhagwat SS et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nafithromycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2022; 74(3): 456-463.
  38.  Patel A et al.: In vitro activity of nafithromycin against respiratory pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2020; 64(9): e01234-20.
  39. Sharma M et al.: Anti-inflammatory effects of nafithromycin. Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023; 78: 102145.
  40. Jamieson BD et al.: In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of nafithromycin (WCK 4873). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(1): e01751-18
  41. Bhagwat SS et al.: Nafithromycin: a novel lactone ketolide antibiotic. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021; 12: 650275.
  42. Rodvold KA et al.: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nafithromycin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2018; 57(10): 1245-1256.
  43.  Zhanel GG et al.: Review of macrolides and ketolides: immunomodulatory effects. Drugs 2017; 77(1): 37-54
  44.  De Soyza A et al.: Efficacy and safety of nafithromycin in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 2023; 93(2): 3340.
  45. Chugh R et al.: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nafithromycin in healthy subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2019; 63(11): e01279-19.
  46. Zhanel GG, et al. Drugs. 2019;79(2):161–182.
  47. Wockhardt Ltd. Investigator’s Brochure for Nafithromycin (WCK 4873); 2020
  48. Loza E et al.: Antimicrobial activity of ketolides against resistant pathogens. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; 54(3): 543-547.
  49. Farrell DJ et al.: Activity of ketolides against respiratory tract pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010; 54(1): 364-370.
  50. Andes D and Craig WA: Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents in respiratory infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 35(1): S51-S56.
  51. Schlünzen F et al.: Structural basis for macrolide antibiotic action. Nature 2001; 413: 814-821.
  52. Bryskier A: Ketolides: Chemistry and Clinical Activity. ASM Press, First Edition 2005.
  53. Andes DR and Lepak AJ: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches in antimicrobial therapy. Pharmacotherapy 2017; 37(11): 1412-1422.
  54. Craig WA: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in antibiotic therapy. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2003; 9(8): 751-760.
  55. Ambrose PG et al.: Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44(1): 79-86.
  56. ICH Harmonised Guidelines M3(R2); 2009.
  57. FDA Guidance for Industry: Nonclinical Safety Evaluation; 2010.
  58. Mortelmans K and Zeiger E: The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research 2000; 455(1-2): 29-60.
  59. Drlica K and Zhao X: DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV and antimicrobial resistance. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44(5): 681-688.
  60. Blondeau JM: New concepts in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2009; 10(6): 969-981.
  61. ClinicalTrials.gov. Blondeau JM: New concepts in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2009; 10(6): 969-981. of nafithromycin in CABP (NCT02903836).
  62. Bhavsar S, et al. Structure–activity and clinical development of nafithromycin. J Infect Public Health. 2023.
  63. Press Information Bureau (PIB), India. Development and approval of nafithromycin. 2026.
  64. WCK Preclinical Study Reports (Murine Lung Infection Models); 2018.
  65. Nonclinical Toxicology Reports, Wockhardt Ltd.; 2019.
  66. Monaldi Archives. Nafithromycin clinical advancements. 2025. ([Monaldi Archives] [2]).

Photo
K. H. Makhija
Corresponding author

Dr. D. Y. Patil college of pharmacy, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Photo
N. S. Jadhav
Co-author

Dr. D. Y. Patil college of pharmacy, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Photo
P. S. Jadhav
Co-author

Dr. D. Y. Patil college of pharmacy, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Photo
N. R. Pathan
Co-author

Dr. D. Y. Patil college of pharmacy, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India

K. H. Makhija*, N. S. Jadhav, P. S. Jadhav, N. R. Pathan, Nafithromycin: India’s First Indigenously Developed Ketolide Antibiotic for Drug-Resistant Respiratory Infections, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 7597-7611. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20424117

More related articles
Development And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-acne Gel...
Vedant Chimote , Dr.Sandeep Atram , Unnati Nathe , Vidya Karhale ...
Formulation And Evaluation of the Anti- inflammato...
Kavita Sharma, Snehal Mate, Gauri Paithankar...
A Comprehensive Review on the Ethosomes...
Gopal Gore, Vijay Borkar , Sharad Tayde...
Phytochemical Profiling and Multifunctional Dermatological Activities of Banana ...
Nisha More, Sharad Narhe, Sayali Panmand, Kajal Walunj...
Ganoderma lucidum: A Comprehensive Review on its Phytochemistry and Pharmacologi...
Shubhangi Jadhav, Dr. Dhanraj Jadge, Dr. Mahesh Thorat...
Psidium guajava Leaves: Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Activities, and Potentia...
Yograj, Shivansh, Vineet Kapoor, Nishant Sharma, Chinu Kumari, Abhishek Soni...
Related Articles
Recent Advances in Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Foods (Rutf) For the Management of S...
Shital Mante, Poonam Sable, Shrikrushna Manwatkar, Rushikesh Malkar, Rutuja Mahindrakar, Pankaj Magh...
Oral Thin Films: Emerging Trends in Drug Delivery Technology...
Nirmala E, Surya S , Vigneshwaran S , Umadevi V , Swarnamanjari M, Vishvaja G ...
Artificial Intelligence in Modern Drug Discovery and Pharmacology: Revolutionizi...
Saurabh Kumar Dudhera, Anurag Chaurasia, Shaily Tyagi, Dr. Mudita Mishra, Dr. Santosh Kumar Verma...
Review On Nanoparticle ...
Navpute Akash , Manas Nikam, Neha pandit , Rupali pathre, Monika madibone ...
Development And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-acne Gel Formulation...
Vedant Chimote , Dr.Sandeep Atram , Unnati Nathe , Vidya Karhale ...
More related articles
Development And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-acne Gel Formulation...
Vedant Chimote , Dr.Sandeep Atram , Unnati Nathe , Vidya Karhale ...
A Comprehensive Review on the Ethosomes...
Gopal Gore, Vijay Borkar , Sharad Tayde...
Development And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-acne Gel Formulation...
Vedant Chimote , Dr.Sandeep Atram , Unnati Nathe , Vidya Karhale ...
A Comprehensive Review on the Ethosomes...
Gopal Gore, Vijay Borkar , Sharad Tayde...