View Article

  • Review on Nanoparticles in Neural Disorders: Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Epilepsy, and Huntington's Disease

  • College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Puri

Abstract

Nanoparticle-based approaches have emerged as a revolutionary frontier in the treatment of neurological illnesses, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), epilepsy, and Huntington’s disease (HD). These illnesses provide considerable therapeutic problems mainly because of the restrictive characteristics of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which significantly hinders drug transport to the central nervous system (CNS). Nanoparticles, engineered materials ranging from 1 to 100 nm, possess distinctive physicochemical properties, including a high surface area, adjustable surface chemistry, and the capacity to penetrate biological barriers, rendering them suitable for targeted drug delivery and therapeutic applications in neural disorders. The optimal nanoparticle for neural applications demonstrates biocompatibility, biodegradability, effective blood-brain barrier penetration, and the ability for multifunctionality, including controlled medication release, targeted delivery, and diagnostic imaging. This report thoroughly examines the utilisation of diverse nanoparticle types in significant neural disorders, elucidating their mechanisms of action, the present research landscape, encompassing preclinical and clinical evidence, and highlighting the principal challenges and future opportunities in translating these innovative strategies into clinical application.

Keywords

emulsion, emulsion stability, emulsion instability, oil-in-water emulsion, water-in-oil emulsion, emulsifying agents

Introduction

× Popup Image

Particles measuring between 1 to 100 nanometres are defined as nanoparticles [1, 2]. These minuscule particles exhibit diverse physicochemical properties; however, their high surface-area-to-volume ratio renders nanoparticles exceptionally advantageous for numerous biomedical applications [1-4]. These characteristics enable nanoparticles to interact efficiently with biological systems, traverse physiological barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and improve the solubility and stability of medicinal compounds [1, 2, 4]. Nanotechnology entails the manipulation of materials at the nanoscale to fabricate novel structures with improved functionality. Nanoparticles can be categorised into several types: organic (e.g., liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles), inorganic (e.g., metallic, carbon-based), and specifically metallic (e.g., gold, silver, iron) or carbon-based (e.g., carbon nanotubes, nanodiamonds, graphene). Nanoparticles' capacity to transport elevated medication concentrations, support targeted delivery, and permit real-time cellular imaging renders them essential instruments in contemporary medicine, especially for complex ailments like neurological disorders [1,4,5].

1.2 Introduction to Neural Disorders

Neurodegenerative illnesses, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), epilepsy, and Huntington’s disease (HD), constitute a substantial worldwide health challenge owing to their progressive characteristics and intricate aetiology [1,2,5,6]. The global and Indian prevalence of neurological diseases is depicted in Figure 1. Alzheimer's disease is defined by the gradual deterioration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurones, accompanied by memory impairment and cognitive decline, as evidenced by the accumulation of β-amyloid plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles [1, 3, 5]. Parkinson's disease entails the gradual decline of the central nervous system, caused by a depletion of dopaminergic neurones in the substantia nigra, culminating in motor complications such as dyskinesia and tremors [1, 5, 7]. A stroke occurs when the brain sustains damage from a disrupted blood supply, resulting in neuronal destruction and permanent dysfunction [5]. Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system marked by primary demyelination and axonal degeneration. Epilepsy is characterised by irregular electrical activity in brain areas, resulting in recurring and unpredictable seizures [5, 10]. Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurological illness resulting from a CAG repeat expansion in the HTT gene, which causes the degradation of neuronal cells in the brain and affects functional capabilities [1, 5, 11].  A significant obstacle in managing these disorders is the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which inhibits the majority of standard pharmaceuticals from attaining therapeutic levels in the brain [1-3,5-6].

Figure 1: The prevalence of the neural disorders around the globe and in India

2. Aims and Objectives of review

This review aims to critically assess the function of nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of significant neurological disorders—Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and Huntington's disease—by examining their optimal characteristics, mechanisms of action, and clinical applicability. It offers a comparative examination of different nanoparticle kinds and their uses in distinct diseases, emphasising targeted delivery across the blood-brain barrier, prolonged drug release, and therapeutic effectiveness. The study examines recent case studies and clinical trials, identifies current problems in nanoparticle-based neurotherapy, and delineates future opportunities such as smart nanoparticles and personalised nanomedicine for successful neurological treatment.

3. Ideal Properties of Nanoparticles in Neural Disorders: A Comparative Study

For effective detection and treatment of brain diseases, nanoparticles must exhibit a combination of optimal physicochemical and biological characteristics. These encompass elevated biocompatibility, effective blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, exact targeted specificity, and regulated release capabilities [3, 5, 12].

3.1 Biocompatibility and Toxicity Considerations

Nanoparticles must exhibit great biocompatibility, allowing interaction with brain tissues without inducing major toxicity, immunological reactions, or persistent inflammation [4-5]. Concerns about toxicity are especially pertinent for metallic and carbon-based nanoparticles, requiring comprehensive evaluations to avert detrimental effects such as oxidative stress, cellular damage, or accumulation in essential organs [1, 4, 13]. The dimensions, morphology, and surface charge of nanoparticles substantially affect their safety profile; for example, smaller nanoparticles may demonstrate heightened toxicity due to enhanced surface reactivity, and rod-shaped nanoparticles can be more cytotoxic than their spherical counterparts. Polymeric nanoparticles, notwithstanding their advantages, may present toxicity hazards stemming from their physicochemical characteristics and possible buildup over time [2].

3.2 Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Penetration

Surmounting the blood-brain barrier is the paramount hurdle in neural medication delivery [1-3,5]. Optimal nanoparticles utilise diverse strategies to traverse this barrier, including receptor-mediated transcytosis (e.g., via transferrin receptors), adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (for cationic particles), and carrier-mediated transport (emulating natural substrates such as glucose) [2-3]. Nanoparticles generally must be less than 100 nm in size for effective blood-brain barrier penetration, with certain studies indicating that ultra-small nanoparticles (< 3 nm) may pass through via paracellular diffusion [1]. Surface functionalisation, including PEGylation, can augment stability and diminish non-specific protein adsorption, hence enhancing blood-brain barrier penetration [3, 13, 14].

3.3 Targeting Precision

Accurate targeting of pathological cells or areas reduces off-target effects and enhances therapy effectiveness [3, 5]. This is accomplished by functionalising nanoparticles with specific ligands, antibodies, or peptides that attach to biomarkers that are overexpressed in pathological conditions, as observed in several neurodegenerative diseases [1, 3]. OX26-conjugated selenium nanoparticles specifically target transferrin receptors, which are abundantly expressed on brain capillary endothelial cells, hence enhancing cerebral absorption [14].

3.4 Regulated Release

Controlled release mechanisms guarantee appropriate medication concentrations throughout time, minimising dose frequency and systemic side effects [1-2]. Nanoparticles can be engineered for prolonged release utilising biodegradable polymers or to be stimulus-responsive, discharging their payload in reaction to pH fluctuations, redox potential, or specific enzymes present in the diseased microenvironment [1-3].

4. Comparative Analysis of Nanoparticle Types

Nanoparticle Type

Advantages in Neural

Disorders

Limitations and

Challenges

Lipid-Based

High biocompatibility and biodegradability; low immunogenicity; ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs; fusogenic properties for cellular uptake; established clinical use; effective for AD, PD, MS, and stroke. Can be modified with targeting ligands and enhance BBB penetration [2, 3, 8].

Stability issues under physiological conditions (osmolarity, pH); premature drug release; challenging for large-scale, consistent production; some designs require invasive administration [2-3].

Polymeric

Excellent tunability in size, shape, surface

properties, and drug release kinetics; high

drug loading capacity; protect drugs from

degradation; can be designed from

biodegradable polymers (e.g., PLGA, chitosan). Effective in AD, PD, and epilepsy for targeted and sustained drug delivery [1-3, 10].

Potential toxicity with certain polymers (e.g., polybutyl cyanoacrylate); challenges in selective brain targeting without surface modifications; accumulation over chronic use [1-2, 10].

Dendrimers

Highly branched, monodisperse structures

with customizable surface functionalities; high drug conjugation capacity; ability to cross BBB; useful for targeted delivery and multivalent interactions.

Potential toxicity, particularly with positively charged surfaces; complex synthesis and purification; challenges in manufacturing scalability.

Metallic (e.g., Gold, Iron

Oxide, Selenium)

Unique optical, magnetic, and catalytic properties suitable for imaging and theranostics; high stability; facile functionalization; can reduce oxidative stress and inflammation. Effective in AD, PD, stroke, and MS.

Concerns about long- term toxicity and bioaccumulation; limited drug loading capacity compared to some polymer systems; potential immunogenicity; requires careful surface functionalization [4, 13].

Carbon-Based (e.g.,

Carbon Dots, Graphene,

CNTs)

High surface area; excellent electrical and

thermal conductivity; good drug loading; able to cross BBB; photoluminescence for

imaging. Useful for AD treatment and neuroprotection.

Significant concerns regarding biocompatibility and toxicity; challenges in controlling size and dispersibility; potential for inducing inflammation and oxidative processes [2, 13].

5. Nanoparticle Strategies in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition marked by the presence of β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. Nanoparticles have exciting opportunities for therapeutic and diagnostic applications in Alzheimer's disease by traversing the blood-brain barrier and targeting specific pathological features. The diverse methodologies pertaining to Alzheimer’s disease are illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.  Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutic and Diagnostic Approaches in Alzheimer’s disease

5.1 Therapeutic Approaches

5.1.1 Amyloid-Targeting Nanoparticles:\

Nanoparticles can impede Aβ aggregation and facilitate the disintegration of pre-existing fibrils. Native poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles can inhibit spontaneous Aβ aggregation and dismantle preformed aggregates by engaging with the hydrophobic domains of Aβ. Multifunctional nanoparticles have been engineered to concurrently decrease Aβ synthesis, disrupt fibrils, enhance Aβ metabolic clearance, and modulate oxidative stress. Chiral nanoparticles have demonstrated the ability to expedite the development of neural stem cells (NSCs) into neurones, potentially mitigating Alzheimer's disease pathology.

5.1.2 Tau-Targeting Nanoparticles:

The aggregation of tau protein represents a significant target in Alzheimer's disease. Nanoparticles can transport drugs that inhibit tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation. A tau-targeted multifunctional nanoinhibitor, consisting of self-assembled polymeric micelles adorned with a tau-binding peptide, effectively obstructs tau aggregation and enhances its proteolytic destruction. Lipid-based nanoparticles containing siRNA have demonstrated the ability to diminish tau protein levels by digesting tau mRNA.

5.1.3 Modulation of Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress:

Nanoparticles can transport anti-inflammatory and antioxidant medicines directly to targeted cerebral areas. Polymeric nanoparticles, comprising zwitterionic poly(carboxybetaine)-based and citraconylation-modified PEG–PTMC nanoparticles, have rectified malfunctioning microglia, diminished pro-inflammatory cytokines, and enhanced mitochondrial activity. Selenium nanoparticles, due to their potent antioxidant properties, have demonstrated potential in mitigating Alzheimer's disease by reducing oxidative stress in the brain. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) demonstrate neuroprotective properties by neutralising reactive oxygen species (ROS) and regulating inflammatory responses.

5.1.4 Stem Cell Integration:

Nanotechnology augments stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease by optimising targeted distribution and enhancing regenerative results. Human Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells, labelled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), can be magnetically directed to the hippocampus, enhancing cell viability and functionality. Human brain stem cells modified with gold nanoparticles exhibit a protective effect against Aβ-induced cellular damage and mitochondrial dysfunction.

5.1.5 Gene Therapy:

Nanoparticles facilitate the delivery of genetic material for therapeutic gene modification. Peptide-delivered CRISPR-Cas9 nanocomplexes have been employed for in vivo gene editing, specifically targeting the Bace1 gene to diminish Aβ peptide formation, resulting in cognitive enhancements in murine models. Non-viral gene delivery systems utilising mesoporous silica nanoparticles or heparinised cationic solid lipid nanoparticles have been engineered to generate specific cell lines from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for neuronal development.

5.2 Diagnostic Methodologies

Nanoparticles function as diagnostic instruments by augmenting imaging capabilities. SPIONs, owing to their magnetic characteristics, facilitate the real-time monitoring of transplanted stem cells in vivo by MRI. Gold nanoparticles are utilised for imaging owing to their optical characteristics and can be functionalised with antibodies to identify Aβ aggregates, hence evaluating disease severity. Theranostic nanoparticles integrate diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, facilitating concurrent imaging and treatment of Alzheimer's disease pathology.

6. Nanoparticle Strategies in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is defined by the loss of dopaminergic neurones in the substantia nigra, resulting in both motor and non-motor symptoms. Nanoparticles present intriguing approaches for drug delivery, neuroprotection, and disease modification in Parkinson's disease.

6.1 Pharmaceutical Administration

Nanoparticles markedly enhance the transport of therapeutic substances across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a critical obstacle for Parkinson's disease medications.

6.1.1 Dopamine Substitution Therapies:

Poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, frequently coated with albumin, can encapsulate dopamine and levodopa, facilitating prolonged release and improved cerebral delivery. These formulations have demonstrated greater durability in motor enhancements in mouse models relative to traditional levodopa therapy, hence decreasing the dosage frequency. Intranasal delivery of nanoparticles co-modified with borneol and lactoferrin has demonstrated enhanced therapeutic efficacy by increasing blood-brain barrier permeability and specifically targeting the striatum.

6.1.2 Targeted Delivery:

Magnetic nanoparticles can guide stem cells to certain brain locations, which is essential for the treatment of conditions such as Parkinson's disease. Magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced human adipose stem cells augment stem cell-based therapy for Parkinson's disease.

6.2 Neuroprotection and Disease Modification

Nanoparticles provide neuroprotection by influencing critical pathogenic mechanisms in Parkinson's disease, such as oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and protein aggregation.

6.2.1 Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effects:

Injectable bioactive hydrogels incorporating tannic acid and gold nano-crosslinkers have demonstrated the ability to promote the proliferation and differentiation of brain stem cells, alongside demonstrating anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) exhibit neuroprotective properties in Parkinson's disease by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress in both in vitro and in vivo models. Curcumin-encapsulated nanodecoys can reinstate dopamine concentrations, enhance blood-brain barrier permeability, diminish alpha-synuclein clumps, and modulate mitochondrial activity.

6.2.2 Stem Cell Enhancement:

Engineered mesenchymal stem cells utilising dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles have enhanced differentiation into dopaminergic neurones and increased neuroprotection. Neural stem cells treated with biocompatible and traceable polymeric nanoparticles expressing microRNA-124 have facilitated neuronal development and augmented natural brain healing processes.

6.2.3 Alpha-Synuclein Modulation:

Gold-doped TiO nanotubes may identify alpha-synuclein, while Nerve Growth Factor-conjugated Au particles have inhibited alpha-synuclein aggregation.

6.3 Novel Neuromodulatory Strategies

6.3.1 Upconversion Nanoparticles:

These nanoparticles convert near-infrared light, which penetrates deeply into tissues, into visible light to trigger genetically modified opsin-expressing cells, facilitating non-invasive optogenetic stimulation.

6.3.2 Magnetothermal Nanoparticles:

These convert external magnetic fields into thermal energy, influencing genetically engineered cells that exhibit heat-sensitive ion channels, hence facilitating targeted neuromodulation.

6.3.3 Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles:

These entities transmute magnetic energy into electric fields, enabling the modulation of local neural activity without genetic alteration, and certain types can be delivered peripherally to traverse the blood-brain barrier.

6.3.4 Ultrasound-Responsive Nanoparticles:

These nanoparticles can be stimulated by focused ultrasound to discharge their therapeutic payload or produce electric currents, facilitating precise, localised medication administration or neuronal activation.

7. Nanoparticle Strategies in Stroke

Stroke, predominantly ischaemic, occurs due to the cessation of cerebral blood flow, resulting in neuronal damage and mortality. Nanoparticles are under investigation for targeted thrombolysis, neuroprotection, and enhanced imaging in stroke treatment.

7.1 Focused Thrombolysis

Nanoparticles can improve the administration and effectiveness of thrombolytic drugs. They can adhere to thrombi, offering both therapeutic and imaging capabilities to assess clot breakdown. The materials do not specify nanoparticle-based thrombolytic medicines but emphasise the possibility for targeted delivery systems for therapeutic drugs in the brain.

7.2 Neuroprotection

Nanoparticles provide neuroprotection by addressing inflammation, oxidative stress, and enhancing neuronal survival following ischaemic events.

7.2.1 Selenium Nanoparticles:

OX26-Polyethylene GlycolOxidised selenium nanoparticles (OX26-PEG-Se NPs) have exhibited considerable neuroprotective effects in mouse models of ischaemic stroke. These nanoparticles mitigate brain oedema, diminish infarction volumes, and safeguard axons in the hippocampal region, resulting in enhanced locomotor function. OX26-PEG-Se NPs do this by mitigating excessive inflammation and oxidative metabolism, altering critical signalling pathways like mTOR, FoxO1, Wnt/β-Catenin, and Jak2/Stat3, while fostering protective autophagy and preventing apoptosis. They additionally bolster endogenous antioxidant defences and preserve the integrity of the extracellular matrix.

7.2.2 Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs):

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) exhibit neuroprotective properties in ischaemic stroke models via mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation.

7.3 Imaging Techniques

Nanoparticles facilitate stroke diagnosis and monitoring by improving imaging techniques. Magnetic nanoparticles can be utilised to monitor cellular migration to lesion locations by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

8. Nanoparticle Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system marked by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration. Nanoparticle-based therapies seek to enhance drug distribution, facilitate immunomodulation, and encourage remyelination, as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.  Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutic and Diagnostic Approaches in Multiple Sclerosis

8.1 Targeted Delivery Mechanisms

The blood-brain barrier is a considerable obstacle for drug delivery in multiple sclerosis, and nanoparticles provide a potential solution.

8.1.1 Liposomes:

Artificial vesicles, such as liposomes, can encapsulate therapeutic substances and traverse the blood-brain barrier to deliver medications to central nervous system lesions. Liposomes containing antigenic myelin peptides can elicit immunological tolerance, hence diminishing inflammation. PEGylated liposomes containing steroids have demonstrated enhanced clinical outcomes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for multiple sclerosis (MS).

8.1.2 Polymeric Nanoparticles:

These can be designed to improve medication solubility, bioavailability, and regulated release. Biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles containing myelin antigens can elicit strong tolerance and prolonged disease prevention in multiple sclerosis models. Chitosan nanoparticles encapsulating siRNA can promote neuroprotection and remyelination by downregulating proteins that inhibit myelination.

8.2 Immunomodulation

Nanoparticles can influence immunological responses to restore immune tolerance and diminish the autoimmune assault on myelin.

8.2.1 Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy:

PLGA nanoparticles can integrate the delivery of antigens with immunomodulatory agents such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) or rapamycin to elicit antigen-specific regulatory T cells, therefore markedly diminishing disease severity in multiple sclerosis models.

8.2.2 Extracellular Vesicles (EVs):

EVs emitted from brain cells, such as microglia, can function as drug carriers and possess therapeutic promise in multiple sclerosis (MS). Engineered electric vehicles can transport various functional chemicals, including anti-inflammatory medicines, for the treatment of neuroinflammatory illnesses. MSC-derived exosomes containing TGF-β, PD-L1, and Gal-1 can suppress the activation of autoreactive lymphocytes.

8.3 Remyelination

Nanoparticles enhance remyelination by stimulating the recruitment and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs).

8.3.1 Targeted Growth Factors:

PLGA nanoparticles modified with antibodies can specifically target oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) and distribute leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) to promote remyelination.

8.3.2 Selenium Nanoparticles:

Oral administration of nanolipidic carriers containing vitamins and selenium has demonstrated enhanced clinical outcomes and remyelination in models of demyelination.

8.4 Gold Nanocrystals:

A suspension of gold nanocrystals (CNM-Au8) markedly ameliorated deficiencies in metabolites associated with cerebral energy metabolism and led to functional enhancements in multiple sclerosis patients during phase two clinical studies.

9. Nanoparticle Strategies in Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder marked by irregular electrical activity and frequent seizures. Nanoparticles provide alternatives for targeted drug administration, enhanced seizure management, and manipulation of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), overcoming the limitations of traditional anti-seizure drugs (ASMs) like low brain bioavailability and drug resistance.

9.1 Focused Pharmacological Administration

Nanoparticles augment the bioavailability of antiseizure medications (ASMs) within the central nervous system (CNS) by facilitating their traversal across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) more efficiently.

9.1.1 Polymeric Nanoparticles (PNP):

PNPs can encapsulate antiepileptic medications such as oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ), resulting in enhanced efficacy and decreased administration frequency in animal models. PLGA nanoparticles have been utilised to transport substances including epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analogues, exhibiting neuroprotective and anticonvulsant properties. PNPs safeguard pharmaceuticals from enzymatic breakdown and immunological response while regulating release kinetics.

9.1.2 Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP):

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) exhibit remarkable versatility owing to their little toxicity and substantial drug loading capability. They can enhance medication absorption and precisely target certain parts of the brain. For example, alprazolam-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles exhibited enhanced cerebral concentration and targeting efficacy when delivered via the intranasal route. Curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles have exhibited neuroprotective efficacy against oxidative damage in vitro. NLCs containing valproic acid exhibit a neuroprotective effect comparable to traditional treatment but at reduced levels through intranasal delivery.

9.2 Management of Seizures

Nanoparticles enhance seizure management by elevating medication concentrations at epileptic foci, thereby diminishing seizure frequency and intensity. The encapsulation of carbamazepine (CBZ) in polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) rendered it 30 times more efficacious against seizures compared to free CBZ and facilitated the circumvention of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance, a prevalent factor in treatment failure.

9.3 BBB Modulation

Nanoparticles can alter blood-brain barrier permeability, facilitating enhanced medication penetration. Certain nanoparticles can penetrate epithelial cells constituting the blood-brain barrier or aggregate on its luminal surface, hence enhancing drug ingress into the brain. The structural resemblance of lipid nanoparticles to endothelial cell lipids facilitates their transit through the transcellular pathway.

10. Nanoparticle Strategies in Huntington's Disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder marked by the gradual deterioration of neuronal cells in the brain, predominantly caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the HTT gene, resulting in the aggregation of mutant huntingtin (mHTT) protein. Nanoparticles present opportunities for gene therapy, neuroprotection, and the administration of disease-modifying drugs in Huntington's disease.

10.1 Gene Therapy

Nanoparticles function as vehicles for nucleic acid-based therapies designed to diminish the expression of the mutant huntingtin gene. The documents do not specify particular gene therapy methods for HD utilising nanoparticles; however, they highlight the capability of nanoparticles to deliver therapeutic genes or gene-editing elements, such as CRISPR/Cas9, directly to impacted neurones, thereby avoiding systemic exposure and minimising off-target effects. The efficacy of nanoparticle-mediated non-viral gene delivery techniques is a primary emphasis.

10.2 Neuroprotection

Nanoparticles are employed to transport neuroprotective medicines to alleviate the consequences of mHTT aggregation and related cellular injury.

10.2.1 Targeting Protein Aggregation:

A nanoparticle formulation of trehalose has been engineered with a zwitterionic surface charge and multivalency, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to molecular trehalose in preventing protein fibrillation and obstructing the aggregation of polyglutamine-containing mutant huntingtin protein in neuronal cells.

10.2.2 Promotion of Cellular Autophagy:

Iron oxide/zinc oxide nanoparticles coated with hemin/amine/arginine/trehalose have been shown to stimulate cellular autophagy and enhance cell survival, essential for the clearance of aggregated proteins in Huntington's disease.

10.2.3 Augmenting Neural Stem Cell Function:

Ferritin nanoparticles have been designed to improve the self-renewal and differentiation of neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells, potentially aiding brain health and regeneration in Huntington's disease.

Magnetic nanoparticles have been studied to control the size of human embryoid bodies, so improving the neural development efficiency of human embryonic stem cells.

10.3 Administration of Disease-Modifying Agents

Nanoparticles facilitate the precise administration of drugs intended to alter the progression of the disease rather than merely alleviate symptoms.

10.3.1 Magnetic Guidance:

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles labelled mesenchymal stem cells have demonstrated a reduction in cell tracking and cerebral damage in a rat model of Huntington’s disease, while human embryonic stem cells labelled with these nanoparticles mitigated motor impairment. Magnetic nanoparticles can guide stem cells to certain brain areas for therapeutic purposes.

10.3.2 Enhancing Neuronal Differentiation:

The efficacy of nerve growth factor and gold-chitosan nanoparticles has been evaluated for their ability to induce the differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann-like cells, which are crucial for nerve health.

11. Case Studies and Clinical Trials on Nanoparticles Utilised for the Treatment of Neurological Disorders

Although several nanoparticle-based strategies for neurological diseases remain in preclinical phases, several attractive candidates have progressed to clinical trials, providing insights into their translational viability.

11.1 Gold Nanocrystals (CNM-Au8) for Mass Spectrometry and Photodetection

An exemplary case is the phase two clinical trials of CNM-Au8, an orally administered suspension of gold nanocrystals, for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Study Design: Two phase II clinical trials, REPAIR-MS and REPAIR-PD, were executed at UT Southwestern Medical Centre. Participants underwent an initial brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy scan to ascertain their baseline NAD+/NADH ratio and other energy metabolites. Subsequently, they administered a daily dosage of CNM-Au8 for 12 weeks, after which a second MR spectroscopy and functional outcome evaluations were conducted.

The study revealed that CNM-Au8 substantially ameliorated deficiencies in metabolites associated with cerebral energy metabolism, especially elevating the NAD+/NADH ratios by an average of 10.4% relative to baseline measurements. Other energy molecules, such as ATP, returned to baseline levels by the conclusion of the treatment. Patients with Parkinson's disease reported enhanced motor sensations in daily activities. Importantly, none of the patients saw significant adverse effects associated with CNM-Au8.

Translational Significance: These findings are cautiously encouraging and indicate that this method may prevent or potentially reverse certain neurological impairments. The research underscores the capacity of gold nanocrystals to beneficially modify the energy equilibrium of brain cells, a process evidenced in prior cellular and animal studies.

11.2 Additional Clinical Research and Trials

11.2.1 Parkinson’s Disease Drug Delivery:

Although human clinical trials utilising PLGA nanoparticles for Parkinson’s disease drug delivery have not commenced, preclinical studies in mouse models have demonstrated enhancements in motor function persisting for a minimum of 7 days, indicating a more sustained advantage compared to existing levodopa treatment. Researchers are currently organising human trials informed by these findings.

11.2.2 Blood-Brain Barrier Opening:

Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) in conjunction with microbubbles has been employed in clinical trials for the purpose of opening the blood-brain barrier in neuro-oncology and Alzheimer's disease. A proof-of-concept trial including seven patients with Parkinson's disease dementia successfully demonstrated transitory opening of the striatal blood-brain barrier, which was well-tolerated. A separate study examined LIFU-induced BBB permeability for glucocerebrosidase administration in Parkinson's disease patients with GBA1 mutations, demonstrating enhanced motor scores.

11.2.3 Gene Therapy:

Initial trials of viral vector-based gene therapy raised safety concerns; nevertheless, recent developments have resulted in FDA-approved gene editing medicines for illnesses such as spinal muscular atrophy. Clinical trials for Parkinson's disease have concentrated on enhancing central nervous system dopamine by altering biosynthetic routes or expressing enzymes such as glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). These trials, which necessitate neurosurgical injection, have demonstrated favourable safety profiles and promising enhancements in motor symptoms. CRISPR-based gene editing is advancing, with prospects for non-viral delivery using nanoparticles, however it has not yet entered clinical trials for central nervous system illnesses.

These case studies and trials illustrate the continuous endeavours and initial achievements in converting nanoparticle technology from preclinical research to human applications in neurological illnesses.

12. Nanoparticle-Driven Approaches for Targeted Treatment in Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms, Applications, and Clinical Implications

The application of nanoparticles in the treatment of neurological illnesses has attracted considerable attention owing to their ability to traverse the blood-brain barrier (BBB), facilitate targeted medication delivery, and offer controlled release mechanisms. This overview delineates the therapeutic potential of diverse nanoparticle systems for significant neurological diseases as presented in Table 1.

Lipid-based nanoparticles, such as liposomes, have demonstrated potential in Alzheimer's disease by improving the encapsulation and distribution of neuroprotective medicines, hence boosting cognitive performance [1]. PLGA-based polymeric nanoparticles facilitate prolonged dopamine administration in Parkinson's disease, providing neuroprotective advantages [2]. Gold nanoparticles demonstrate anti-inflammatory and antioxidant qualities advantageous in Multiple Sclerosis, mitigating demyelination [3], whereas iron oxide nanoparticles facilitate targeted imaging and treatment in glioblastoma owing to their magnetic characteristics [4].

Carbon-based nanoparticles, such as graphene oxide, have reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging capabilities, enhancing motor neurone viability in ALS [5]. Silica nanoparticles improve drug delivery in Alzheimer's disease by controlled release and targeted transport across the blood-brain barrier. Cerium oxide nanoparticles mitigate oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease, hence promoting the health of dopaminergic neurones [7].

In brain imaging, quantum dots function as fluorescent probes to define tumour boundaries in glioblastoma [8]. Dendrimers, due to their modifiable surface, facilitate gene and medication delivery in Huntington's disease, enhancing siRNA administration [9]. PEGylated nanoparticles, which prolong circulation, enhance thrombolytic delivery in stroke treatment [10], whereas chitosan nanoparticles provide regulated antiepileptic medication delivery in epilepsy [11].

Albumin nanoparticles augment levodopa bioavailability in Parkinson’s disease [12], while solid lipid nanoparticles facilitate the delivery of polyphenols such as curcumin and resveratrol in Alzheimer’s disease [13].

These nanocarriers signify a breakthrough in neurotherapeutics, offering increased efficacy, diminished adverse effects, and better patient outcomes for many neurological illnesses.

Table-1: Nanoparticle-Based Strategies for Targeted Therapy in Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms, Applications, and Clinical Impact

#

Nanoparticle Type

Mechanism of Action

Target Neural Disorder

Clinical Significance

Ref

1

Lipid-based nanoparticles (e.g., liposomes)

Encapsulation of neuroprotective drugs; BBB crossing via endocytosis

Alzheimer’s disease

Improved memory and cognitive function

[1]

2

Polymeric nanoparticles (e.g., PLGA)

Sustained drug release; BBB penetration via adsorption-mediated transcytosis

Parkinson’s disease

Increased dopamine delivery and neuroprotection

[2]

3

Gold nanoparticles

Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant; photothermal therapy

Multiple Sclerosis

Reduced neuroinflammation and demyelination

[3]

4

Iron oxide nanoparticles

Magnetic targeting; MRI enhancement

Glioblastoma

Improved tumor imaging and targeting

[4]

5

Carbon-based nanoparticles (graphene oxide)

ROS scavenging and neuroprotection

ALS

Improved motor neuron survival

[5]

6

Silica nanoparticles

Controlled drug release; surface modification for BBB targeting

Alzheimer’s disease

Enhanced acetylcholinesterase inhibitor delivery

[6]

7

Cerium oxide nanoparticles

Antioxidant activity via ROS scavenging

Parkinson’s disease

Reduced oxidative damage in dopaminergic neurons

[7]

8

Quantum dots

Fluorescent labeling for neural imaging

Glioblastoma

Enhanced tumor margin visualization

[8]

9

Dendrimers

Multifunctional surface for drug/gene delivery

Huntington’s disease

Improved siRNA and neuroprotectant delivery

[9]

10

PEGylated nanoparticles

Prolonged circulation; reduced opsonization

Stroke

Enhanced thrombolytic delivery

[10]

11

Chitosan nanoparticles

Mucoadhesive; neuroprotective

Epilepsy

Controlled release of antiepileptic drugs

[11]

12

Albumin nanoparticles

Biocompatible hydrophobic drug carrier

Parkinson’s disease

Improved bioavailability of levodopa

[12]

13

Solid lipid nanoparticles

BBB penetration and drug protection

Alzheimer’s disease

Enhanced curcumin/resveratrol delivery

[13]

13. Obstacles to Delivery

Notwithstanding the considerable promise of nanoparticles in addressing brain diseases, numerous substantial challenges and obstacles must be surmounted for their extensive clinical utilisation.

13.1 Penetration of the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB)

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) constitutes the principal impediment to drug delivery within the central nervous system (CNS), significantly restricting the ingress of the majority of therapeutic medicines. Although nanoparticles can be designed to cross the blood-brain barrier by mechanisms such as receptor-mediated transcytosis or adsorptive-mediated transport, attaining effective and reliable penetration is intricate. The tight junctions and efflux pumps of the blood-brain barrier (e.g., P-glycoprotein) actively impede the passage of nanoparticles, complicating the delivery of medicines at therapeutically effective concentrations.

13.2 Toxicity and Immunogenicity

The intrinsic characteristics of nanoparticles, including their dimensions, morphology, surface charge, and composition, can affect their toxicity and immunogenicity.

13.3 Neurotoxicity:

Certain nanoparticles may provoke oxidative stress, inflammation, and cellular injury, potentially undermining neuronal function. Research indicates that specific metal oxide nanoparticles or carbon nanotubes can result in compromised metabolic functions, mitochondrial impairment, and DNA damage. Polymeric nanoparticles, notwithstanding their advantages, may accumulate in cerebral tissues over time, leading to the formation of harmful aggregates.

13.4 Immunogenicity:

Nanoparticles may elicit immunological responses, resulting in inflammation or undesirable consequences that diminish therapeutic efficacy. Creating biocompatible materials that reduce immune recognition is essential for prolonged usage.

13.5 Scalability and Reproducibility

Producing nanoparticles with uniform size, shape, surface properties, and drug loading efficiency on a large scale presents significant technical difficulties. The absence of standardised production techniques and quality control protocols hinders batch-to-batch repeatability, which is essential for clinical translation and regulatory approval. These challenges additionally exacerbate the elevated expenses associated with synthesis and development.

13.6 Prolonged Consequences and Regulatory Obstacles

The long-term safety and biodistribution of nanoparticles within the body, especially their potential for bioaccumulation in organs such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs, necessitate thorough examination. Regulatory frameworks continue to develop to accommodate the distinct characteristics and possible hazards of nanomedicines, resulting in protracted licensing processes. This ambiguity obstructs investment and clinical application.

14. Prospective Developments

The domain of nanoparticle research for neurological illnesses is advancing swiftly, with numerous developing themes focused on surmounting existing limits and optimising therapeutic efficacy.

14.1 Intelligent Nanoparticles

A notable trend is the creation of smart or stimuli-responsive nanoparticles, engineered to release their therapeutic payload in reaction to certain biological signals within the sick microenvironment. These nanoparticles can be activated by alterations in pH, redox potential, enzymatic activity, or external stimuli such as light, magnetic fields, or ultrasound. This precise release improves targeting specificity, reduces off-target effects, and maximises drug concentration at the site of action. Multifunctional nanoparticles are being created to integrate therapeutic and diagnostic activities (theranostics), facilitating real-time monitoring of illness development and treatment response in conjunction with drug delivery.

14.2 Tailored Nanomedicine

The future offers potential for personalised nanomedicine, wherein nanoparticle-based therapeutics are customised to individual patient profiles, taking into account their distinct genetic composition, illness phenotype, and specific pathological indicators. This strategy seeks to enhance therapeutic effectiveness and reduce unwanted effects through the optimisation of nanoparticle design tailored to each patient. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are anticipated to significantly contribute to this trend by facilitating material selection, forecasting patient responses, and enhancing nanoparticle design.

14.3 Sophisticated Delivery Pathways

In addition to intravenous delivery, additional non-invasive methods are under investigation. Intranasal administration circumvents the blood-brain barrier, facilitating direct transport of nanoparticles from the nasal cavity to the brain, hence minimising systemic exposure and hepatic first-pass metabolism. This approach has potential for enhancing patient compliance and acceptance owing to its convenience. Research is being conducted on transdermal medication delivery systems that utilise nanoparticles for sustained, effective concentration over extended periods.

14.4 Augmented Regeneration and Repair

Nanomaterials are being engineered not only for drug delivery but also to actively facilitate neuro-regeneration and repair. Graphene oxide nanofibers can serve as scaffolding to promote neuronal regeneration and improve motor and cognitive functions by facilitating the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells. This entails replicating the stem cell milieu to enhance survival and differentiation into neurones.

14.5 Regulatory Considerations and Safety Enhancement

As these technologies progress, establishing comprehensive regulatory frameworks and guaranteeing long-term safety are essential tasks. Future study will concentrate on extensive toxicological and pharmacological investigations, encompassing evaluations of bioaccumulation and immunological responses, to provide thorough safety profiles for prolonged neurological therapies. Standardising techniques and production processes is crucial for effective clinical translation.

CONCLUSION

Nanoparticle-based treatments have emerged as a transformational and diverse platform for managing neurological illnesses, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and Huntington's disease. Their distinctive nanoscale characteristics provide improved drug transport through the formidable blood-brain barrier (BBB), precise therapeutic targeting, and integrated diagnostic functions. Notwithstanding these advantageous characteristics, considerable obstacles remain, such as complex blood-brain barrier permeability, possible nanoparticle-induced neurotoxicity and immunogenicity, and difficulties in scaled, reproducible manufacturing procedures. Overcoming these challenges necessitates multidisciplinary strategies that combine modern materials science, neurobiology, and regulatory frameworks to enhance nanoparticle design, guarantee biosafety, and facilitate clinical translation. Future initiatives emphasise the advancement of intelligent, stimuli-responsive nanoparticles and customised nanomedicine strategies designed for specific patient profiles, in conjunction with thorough preclinical and clinical assessments. Ongoing innovation and collaboration in nanoparticle applications possess significant promise to transform therapy tactics and enhance results for patients with neurological illnesses.

REFERENCES

  1. Fatima J, Siddique YH. Application of nanocomposites and nanoparticles in treating neurodegenerative disorders. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets. 2024 Oct 1;23(10):1217-33.
  2. Slankamenac P, Stefanovi? D, Ziki? M. Neurology today. Medicinski pregled. 2007 Nov 1;60(11-12):629-35.
  3. Gude H. An idea of Neurological Disorders. International Journal of Neurorehabilitation. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc0edb95b1ef7a9012d4be55219c464b0c96e144
  4. Ven Sumedh Thero I. Meditation May Alter Medication Sleep Disorder and Mental Illness. Archives in Neurology & Neuroscience. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55a7d4e2ee97b66577765a4c7a906553aa08b3c
  5. Sonsalla PK. Drugs used in neurodegenerative disorders. In: Charles RC, Stitzel RE, editors. Modern Pharmacology With Clinical Applications. Elsevier; 1997.
  6. Sriramoju B, Kanwar RK, Kanwar JR. Nanomedicine based nanoparticles for neurological disorders. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2014 Dec 1;21(36):4154-68.
  7. Altinoglu G, Adali T. Alzheimer’s disease targeted nano-based drug delivery systems. Current Drug Targets. 2020 Jun 1;21(7):628-46.
  8. Rahman MM, Islam MR, Akash S, Mim M, Noor Alam M, Nepovimova E, Valis M, Kuca K, Sharma R. Exploring the role of nanomedicines for the therapeutic approach of central nervous system dysfunction: At a glance. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022 Sep 2;10:989471.
  9. Sa P, Singh P, Dilnawaz F, Sahoo SK. Application of therapeutic nanoplatforms as a potential candidate for the treatment of CNS disorders: Challenges and possibilities. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2022 Sep 1;28(33):2742-57.
  10. Nishikant T, Rishu, Vikrant C. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: An Indian Journal. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fb8a5f2d57bab75d5a21c66e7c8ed97c84eb847
  11. Bharathala S, Sharma P. Biomedical applications of nanoparticles. In: Nanotechnology in Modern Animal Biotechnology. Elsevier; 2019. p.113-132.
  12. McNamara K, Tofail SA. Nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Advances in Physics: X. 2017 Jan 2;2(1):54-88.
  13. Jain MP, Choi AO, Maysinger D. Nanoparticles and Toxicoepigenomics. In: Toxicology and Epigenetics. 2012. p.409-426.
  14. Shim SY, Lim DK, Nam JM. Ultrasensitive optical biodiagnostic methods using metallic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2008 Apr 1;3(2):215-32.
  15. Acharya S, Meenambiga SS. Nanotechnology in Parkinson's disease-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020;13(4):1967-71.
  16. Radhakrishnan K, Senthil Kumar P, Rangasamy G, Ankitha K, Niyathi V, Manivasagan V, Saranya K. Recent advances in nanotechnology and its application for neuro-disease: a review. Applied Nanoscience. 2023 Sep;13(9):6631-65.
  17. Tang L, Fu C, Zhang A, Li X, Cao Y, Feng J, Liu H, Dong H, Wang W. Harnessing nanobiotechnology for cerebral ischemic stroke management. Biomaterials Science. 2023;11(3):791-812.
  18. Wechsler ME, Vela Ramirez JE, Peppas NA. Nanoparticle mediated drug delivery for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: crossing the blood–brain barrier. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019 Jul 23;58(33):15079-87.
  19. Siddiqi KS, Husen A, Sohrab SS, Yassin MO. Recent status of nanomaterial fabrication and their potential applications in neurological disease management. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2018 Dec;13(1):231.
  20. Farheen, Khan MA, Ashraf GM, Bilgrami AL, Rizvi MM. New horizons in the treatment of neurological disorders with tailorable gold nanoparticles. Current Drug Metabolism. 2021 Oct 1;22(12):931-8.
  21. Rahman MM, Ferdous KS, Ahmed M. Emerging promise of nanoparticle-based treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2020;10:7135-51.
  22. Mohammed V, Kalarani IB, Veerabathiran R. Nanomedicine in Neuroscience. Current Nanomedicine. 2022 Jul 1;12(2):84-92.
  23. Rai G, Sharma S, Bhasin J, Aggarwal K, Ahuja A, Dang S. Nanotechnological advances in the treatment of epilepsy. Nanotechnology. 2024 Jan 24;35(15):152002.
  24. Dey A, Ghosh S, Rajendran RL, et al. Alzheimer’s disease pathology and assistive nanotheranostic approaches. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 Sep 7;25(17):9690.
  25. Abbas M. Potential role of nanoparticles in treating amyloid-beta accumulation. Polymers. 2021 Mar 27;13(7):1051.
  26. Aili M, Zhou K, Zhan J, Zheng H, Luo F. Anti-inflammatory role of gold nanoparticles in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2023;11(36):8605-21.
  27. dos Santos Tramontin N, et al. Gold nanoparticles treatment reverses brain damage in Alzheimer’s disease model. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):926-36.
  28. Kim CK, et al. Ceria nanoparticles that can protect against ischemic stroke. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012 Oct 29;51(44):11039.
  29. Obulesu M, Jhansilakshmi M. Neuroprotective role of nanoparticles against Alzheimer’s disease. Current Drug Metabolism. 2016 Feb 1;17(2):142-9.
  30. Agarwal M, Alam MR, Haider MK, Malik MZ, Kim DK. Alzheimer’s disease and nanotechnology. Nanomaterials. 2020 Dec 29;11(1):59.
  31. Martin-Rapun R, et al. Targeted nanoparticles for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2017 Apr 1;23(13):1927-52.
  32. Agraharam G, Saravanan N, Girigoswami A, Girigoswami K. Future of Alzheimer’s disease. BioNanoScience. 2022 Sep;12(3):1002-17.
  33. Ulanova M, et al. Nanoparticles as contrast agents for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Nanomedicine. 2020 Mar 1;15(7):725-43.
  34. Amiri H, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles as MRI theranostic agents in Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2013 Nov 20;4(11):1417-29.
  35. Pathak M, Singhal R. Nanocomposites in Alzheimer’s disease. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2022;12(1):940-60.
  36. Yadav VK, et al. Recent advances in nanotechnology for Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025 Jan 22;12:1535682.
  37. Majumdar M, Badwaik H. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery in Parkinson’s disease. Current Drug Targets. 2024 Dec;25(15):987-1011.
  38. Barcia E, et al. Nanotechnology-based delivery of ropinirole for Parkinson’s disease. Drug Delivery. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):1112-23.
  39. Kalcec N, et al. Selenium nanoparticles for Parkinson’s disease. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2023 Sep 20;6(19):17581-92.
  40. Chiang MC, et al. Gold nanoparticles in neurological diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 Feb 17;25(4):2360.
  41. Chen L, Gao X. Nanoparticles for neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke. Therapeutic Delivery. 2017 Oct 1;8(10):915-28.
  42. Gidwani M, Singh AV. Nanoparticle enabled drug delivery across the BBB. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2013 Nov 1;14(14):1201-12.
  43. Nair SA, Dileep A, Rajanikant GK. Nanotechnology in ischemic stroke. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012 Feb 1;19(5):744-56.
  44. Panagiotou S, Saha S. Therapeutic benefits of nanoparticles in stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2015 May 19;9:182.
  45. Liao J, et al. Targeted nanotherapies for ischemic stroke. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 29;19(9):3026-41.
  46. Prego-Domínguez J, et al. Nanoparticles for thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke. Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 6;17(2):208.
  47. Landowski LM, et al. Applications of nanotechnology in stroke. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2020 Jul;46(5):592-605.
  48. Sarmah D, et al. Nanotechnology in stroke diagnosis and treatment. Drug Discovery Today. 2021 Feb 1;26(2):585-92.
  49. Ghalamfarsa G, et al. Nanomedicine in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Immunotoxicology. 2016 Sep 2;13(5):603-19.
  50. Sidoryk-W?grzynowicz M, et al. Nanosystems and exosomes in multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2021 Nov;54(9):7377-404.
  51. Rasool M, et al. Nanomedicines in multiple sclerosis. Current Drug Metabolism. 2015 Oct 1;16(8):602-8.
  52. Jan Z, et al. Targeted delivery platforms for multiple sclerosis. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 3;19(7):1952-76.
  53. Mahmoudi M, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles in multiple sclerosis. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2011 Mar 16;2(3):118-40.
  54. Gurav N, Mhatre S. Nanoscience in multiple sclerosis. The Bombay Technologist. 2019;66(1):16-24.
  55. Takei EK. Nanoparticles in multiple sclerosis. STEM Fellowship Journal. 2024 May 23;10(1):59-73.
  56. Li S, et al. Nanomedicine in epilepsy treatment. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2024 May 3;21(5):735-50.
  57. Pedrero SG, et al. Nanomaterials for epilepsy. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2022 Jun 1;22(11):1460-75.
  58. He S, et al. Nanomaterial innovations in epilepsy. Molecular Neurobiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):946-61.
  59. Jun-lin Mu, et al. Nanoparticle effects in epilepsy models. Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine. 2011.
  60. Sahin H, et al. Oxytocin-loaded nanoparticles in epilepsy. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2022 Jun 17;13(13):1923-37.
  61. Shende P, Trivedi R. Nanotheranostics in epilepsy. Nano Select. 2021 Jul;2(7):1277-90.
  62. Cong W, et al. Selenium nanoparticles for Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019 Sep 3;11(38):34725-35.
  63. Ramaswamy S, Shannon KM, Kordower JH. Huntington's disease mechanisms. Cell Transplantation. 2007 Mar;16(3):301-12.
  64. Rohiwal SS, et al. siRNA delivery for Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2023 Mar 27;6(7):5106-16.
  65. Debnath K, et al. Poly(trehalose) nanoparticles in Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017 Jun 20;9(28):24126-39.
  66. Valenza M, et al. Cholesterol-loaded nanoparticles in Huntington’s disease. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2015 Dec;7(12):1547-64.
  67. de Bem Silveira G, et al. Gold nanoparticles in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021 Dec;16(12):2425-6.
  68. Cano A, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for neurodegenerative diseases. Nanomedicine. 2020 May 1;15(12):1239-61.
  69. Sánchez-López E, et al. Memantine loaded nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2018 Mar 27;16(1):32.?   

Reference

  1. Fatima J, Siddique YH. Application of nanocomposites and nanoparticles in treating neurodegenerative disorders. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets. 2024 Oct 1;23(10):1217-33.
  2. Slankamenac P, Stefanovi? D, Ziki? M. Neurology today. Medicinski pregled. 2007 Nov 1;60(11-12):629-35.
  3. Gude H. An idea of Neurological Disorders. International Journal of Neurorehabilitation. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc0edb95b1ef7a9012d4be55219c464b0c96e144
  4. Ven Sumedh Thero I. Meditation May Alter Medication Sleep Disorder and Mental Illness. Archives in Neurology & Neuroscience. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55a7d4e2ee97b66577765a4c7a906553aa08b3c
  5. Sonsalla PK. Drugs used in neurodegenerative disorders. In: Charles RC, Stitzel RE, editors. Modern Pharmacology With Clinical Applications. Elsevier; 1997.
  6. Sriramoju B, Kanwar RK, Kanwar JR. Nanomedicine based nanoparticles for neurological disorders. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2014 Dec 1;21(36):4154-68.
  7. Altinoglu G, Adali T. Alzheimer’s disease targeted nano-based drug delivery systems. Current Drug Targets. 2020 Jun 1;21(7):628-46.
  8. Rahman MM, Islam MR, Akash S, Mim M, Noor Alam M, Nepovimova E, Valis M, Kuca K, Sharma R. Exploring the role of nanomedicines for the therapeutic approach of central nervous system dysfunction: At a glance. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022 Sep 2;10:989471.
  9. Sa P, Singh P, Dilnawaz F, Sahoo SK. Application of therapeutic nanoplatforms as a potential candidate for the treatment of CNS disorders: Challenges and possibilities. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2022 Sep 1;28(33):2742-57.
  10. Nishikant T, Rishu, Vikrant C. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: An Indian Journal. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fb8a5f2d57bab75d5a21c66e7c8ed97c84eb847
  11. Bharathala S, Sharma P. Biomedical applications of nanoparticles. In: Nanotechnology in Modern Animal Biotechnology. Elsevier; 2019. p.113-132.
  12. McNamara K, Tofail SA. Nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Advances in Physics: X. 2017 Jan 2;2(1):54-88.
  13. Jain MP, Choi AO, Maysinger D. Nanoparticles and Toxicoepigenomics. In: Toxicology and Epigenetics. 2012. p.409-426.
  14. Shim SY, Lim DK, Nam JM. Ultrasensitive optical biodiagnostic methods using metallic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2008 Apr 1;3(2):215-32.
  15. Acharya S, Meenambiga SS. Nanotechnology in Parkinson's disease-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020;13(4):1967-71.
  16. Radhakrishnan K, Senthil Kumar P, Rangasamy G, Ankitha K, Niyathi V, Manivasagan V, Saranya K. Recent advances in nanotechnology and its application for neuro-disease: a review. Applied Nanoscience. 2023 Sep;13(9):6631-65.
  17. Tang L, Fu C, Zhang A, Li X, Cao Y, Feng J, Liu H, Dong H, Wang W. Harnessing nanobiotechnology for cerebral ischemic stroke management. Biomaterials Science. 2023;11(3):791-812.
  18. Wechsler ME, Vela Ramirez JE, Peppas NA. Nanoparticle mediated drug delivery for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: crossing the blood–brain barrier. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019 Jul 23;58(33):15079-87.
  19. Siddiqi KS, Husen A, Sohrab SS, Yassin MO. Recent status of nanomaterial fabrication and their potential applications in neurological disease management. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2018 Dec;13(1):231.
  20. Farheen, Khan MA, Ashraf GM, Bilgrami AL, Rizvi MM. New horizons in the treatment of neurological disorders with tailorable gold nanoparticles. Current Drug Metabolism. 2021 Oct 1;22(12):931-8.
  21. Rahman MM, Ferdous KS, Ahmed M. Emerging promise of nanoparticle-based treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2020;10:7135-51.
  22. Mohammed V, Kalarani IB, Veerabathiran R. Nanomedicine in Neuroscience. Current Nanomedicine. 2022 Jul 1;12(2):84-92.
  23. Rai G, Sharma S, Bhasin J, Aggarwal K, Ahuja A, Dang S. Nanotechnological advances in the treatment of epilepsy. Nanotechnology. 2024 Jan 24;35(15):152002.
  24. Dey A, Ghosh S, Rajendran RL, et al. Alzheimer’s disease pathology and assistive nanotheranostic approaches. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 Sep 7;25(17):9690.
  25. Abbas M. Potential role of nanoparticles in treating amyloid-beta accumulation. Polymers. 2021 Mar 27;13(7):1051.
  26. Aili M, Zhou K, Zhan J, Zheng H, Luo F. Anti-inflammatory role of gold nanoparticles in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2023;11(36):8605-21.
  27. dos Santos Tramontin N, et al. Gold nanoparticles treatment reverses brain damage in Alzheimer’s disease model. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):926-36.
  28. Kim CK, et al. Ceria nanoparticles that can protect against ischemic stroke. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012 Oct 29;51(44):11039.
  29. Obulesu M, Jhansilakshmi M. Neuroprotective role of nanoparticles against Alzheimer’s disease. Current Drug Metabolism. 2016 Feb 1;17(2):142-9.
  30. Agarwal M, Alam MR, Haider MK, Malik MZ, Kim DK. Alzheimer’s disease and nanotechnology. Nanomaterials. 2020 Dec 29;11(1):59.
  31. Martin-Rapun R, et al. Targeted nanoparticles for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2017 Apr 1;23(13):1927-52.
  32. Agraharam G, Saravanan N, Girigoswami A, Girigoswami K. Future of Alzheimer’s disease. BioNanoScience. 2022 Sep;12(3):1002-17.
  33. Ulanova M, et al. Nanoparticles as contrast agents for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Nanomedicine. 2020 Mar 1;15(7):725-43.
  34. Amiri H, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles as MRI theranostic agents in Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2013 Nov 20;4(11):1417-29.
  35. Pathak M, Singhal R. Nanocomposites in Alzheimer’s disease. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2022;12(1):940-60.
  36. Yadav VK, et al. Recent advances in nanotechnology for Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025 Jan 22;12:1535682.
  37. Majumdar M, Badwaik H. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery in Parkinson’s disease. Current Drug Targets. 2024 Dec;25(15):987-1011.
  38. Barcia E, et al. Nanotechnology-based delivery of ropinirole for Parkinson’s disease. Drug Delivery. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):1112-23.
  39. Kalcec N, et al. Selenium nanoparticles for Parkinson’s disease. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2023 Sep 20;6(19):17581-92.
  40. Chiang MC, et al. Gold nanoparticles in neurological diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 Feb 17;25(4):2360.
  41. Chen L, Gao X. Nanoparticles for neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke. Therapeutic Delivery. 2017 Oct 1;8(10):915-28.
  42. Gidwani M, Singh AV. Nanoparticle enabled drug delivery across the BBB. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2013 Nov 1;14(14):1201-12.
  43. Nair SA, Dileep A, Rajanikant GK. Nanotechnology in ischemic stroke. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012 Feb 1;19(5):744-56.
  44. Panagiotou S, Saha S. Therapeutic benefits of nanoparticles in stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2015 May 19;9:182.
  45. Liao J, et al. Targeted nanotherapies for ischemic stroke. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 29;19(9):3026-41.
  46. Prego-Domínguez J, et al. Nanoparticles for thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke. Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 6;17(2):208.
  47. Landowski LM, et al. Applications of nanotechnology in stroke. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2020 Jul;46(5):592-605.
  48. Sarmah D, et al. Nanotechnology in stroke diagnosis and treatment. Drug Discovery Today. 2021 Feb 1;26(2):585-92.
  49. Ghalamfarsa G, et al. Nanomedicine in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Immunotoxicology. 2016 Sep 2;13(5):603-19.
  50. Sidoryk-W?grzynowicz M, et al. Nanosystems and exosomes in multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2021 Nov;54(9):7377-404.
  51. Rasool M, et al. Nanomedicines in multiple sclerosis. Current Drug Metabolism. 2015 Oct 1;16(8):602-8.
  52. Jan Z, et al. Targeted delivery platforms for multiple sclerosis. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 3;19(7):1952-76.
  53. Mahmoudi M, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles in multiple sclerosis. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2011 Mar 16;2(3):118-40.
  54. Gurav N, Mhatre S. Nanoscience in multiple sclerosis. The Bombay Technologist. 2019;66(1):16-24.
  55. Takei EK. Nanoparticles in multiple sclerosis. STEM Fellowship Journal. 2024 May 23;10(1):59-73.
  56. Li S, et al. Nanomedicine in epilepsy treatment. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2024 May 3;21(5):735-50.
  57. Pedrero SG, et al. Nanomaterials for epilepsy. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2022 Jun 1;22(11):1460-75.
  58. He S, et al. Nanomaterial innovations in epilepsy. Molecular Neurobiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):946-61.
  59. Jun-lin Mu, et al. Nanoparticle effects in epilepsy models. Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine. 2011.
  60. Sahin H, et al. Oxytocin-loaded nanoparticles in epilepsy. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2022 Jun 17;13(13):1923-37.
  61. Shende P, Trivedi R. Nanotheranostics in epilepsy. Nano Select. 2021 Jul;2(7):1277-90.
  62. Cong W, et al. Selenium nanoparticles for Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019 Sep 3;11(38):34725-35.
  63. Ramaswamy S, Shannon KM, Kordower JH. Huntington's disease mechanisms. Cell Transplantation. 2007 Mar;16(3):301-12.
  64. Rohiwal SS, et al. siRNA delivery for Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2023 Mar 27;6(7):5106-16.
  65. Debnath K, et al. Poly(trehalose) nanoparticles in Huntington’s disease. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017 Jun 20;9(28):24126-39.
  66. Valenza M, et al. Cholesterol-loaded nanoparticles in Huntington’s disease. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2015 Dec;7(12):1547-64.
  67. de Bem Silveira G, et al. Gold nanoparticles in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021 Dec;16(12):2425-6.
  68. Cano A, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for neurodegenerative diseases. Nanomedicine. 2020 May 1;15(12):1239-61.
  69. Sánchez-López E, et al. Memantine loaded nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2018 Mar 27;16(1):32.?   

Photo
Anup Kumar Patra
Corresponding author

College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Puri

Photo
Basanta Kumar Behera
Co-author

College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Puri

Mayuri Patil, Akshay Mahajan, Shantanu Patil, Darshana Chaudhari, Sunaina Dhangar, Pharmaceutical Dosage Form "Emulsion", Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 2491-2510. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126445

More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Kris...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face ...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswa...
Virtual Screening of Bioactive Constituents of Lagenaria siceraria as Potential ...
Dinesh Kawade, Gun Chourasia, Shashwati Motghare, Dipak Rinait, Alpana Asnani...
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Modern Prodrug Design: Linker Chemistry and Payload ...
G. E. Ebimo-Moko, T. Ganatra, V. Ebimo-Moko, W. E. Madu, J. E. Sampson, J. D. Joel, F. O. Oladele...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face Wash Tablets Containing Sandal...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak Bhosale...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Soap...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswati, Ghevare Omkar, Gangapure Sakshi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face Wash Tablets Containing Sandal...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak Bhosale...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Soap...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswati, Ghevare Omkar, Gangapure Sakshi...