View Article

  • Multitarget Therapeutic Potential of Thiazolidinedione-Based Derivatives in Cancer, Diabetes, And Inflammation: A Comprehensive Review

  • Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram

Abstract

Thiazolidinedione derivatives are an important class of heterocyclic compounds primarily known for their antidiabetic activity through modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-?). Recent studies have demonstrated their broader pharmacological potential in cancer and inflammatory disorders by influencing apoptosis, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, cell proliferation, and inflammatory pathways. The strong association between diabetes, chronic inflammation, and cancer progression has increased interest in multi-target therapeutic strategies. In this regard, thiazolidinedione-based hybrid molecules have emerged as promising candidates by combining the pharmacological benefits of the thiazolidinedione scaffold with other bioactive moieties to improve efficacy and selectivity. This review discusses recent advances in the design and development of TZD-based hybrids with enhanced therapeutic potential against diabetes, cancer, and inflammatory disorders. Various TZD derivatives have shown promising biological activities through multitarget actions such as regulation of glucose metabolism, inhibition of cancer cell growth, induction of apoptosis, and suppression of inflammatory pathways. This review also highlights the importance of molecular hybridization and computational approaches in developing safer, more selective, and effective TZD-based therapeutics for the management of diabetes-associated cancer and inflammation.

Keywords

Thiazolidinedione, anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, multitarget, molecular hybridization

Introduction

× Popup Image

Cancer and diabetes mellitus are major global health challenges with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Chronic inflammation acts as a common pathological link between diabetes and cancer progression, contributing to oxidative stress, angiogenesis, and cellular proliferation. Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and remains one of the leading causes of death globally1. Diabetes mellitus, particularly Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a chronic metabolic disorder associated with persistent hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and often hyperinsulinemia, and is associated with long-term complications, including nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disorders2.

In T2DM, prolonged hyperglycemia and insulin resistance promote cellular damage through glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, and activation of inflammatory pathways such as nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)3. These molecular alterations result in increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), thereby creating a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment that supports abnormal cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis, ultimately increasing cancer risk3,4. Epidemiological evidence suggests that T2DM increases the risk of several malignancies, including liver, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, endometrial, and bladder cancers, highlighting a strong pathological link between metabolic disorders and tumor progression1,4.

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) or glitazones represent an important class of insulin sensitisers used in the management of T2DM, primarily by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), a nuclear receptor involved in glucose and lipid metabolism5. Recently, activation of PPAR-γ by TZDs has been associated with significant anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects through regulation of cell differentiation, inhibition of cellular proliferation, induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, suppression of tumor angiogenesis, and reduction of inflammatory mediators and pro-inflammatory cytokines6-8.

TZD scaffold can be substituted at the 3rd and 5th positions with different moieties to increase its potential activity9. 2,4-TZD core is often combined with diverse heterocyclic substitutes, resulting in the generation of distinct lead compounds which are investigated for their potential to act as antidiabetic, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant agents10-13. Therefore, thiazolidinedione-based derivatives and molecular hybrids have emerged as promising multi-target therapeutic agents for managing diabetes-associated cancer and inflammation by simultaneously modulating metabolic, proliferative, and inflammatory pathways.

2. TZDs as multitarget therapeutic agents

2.1 TZDs as antidiabetic agents

The antidiabetic activity of TZDs is primarily mediated through activation of PPAR-γ, a ligand-activated nuclear receptor involved in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity5,14,15. Upon activation, PPAR-γ forms a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and binds to peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs), leading to modulation of genes involved in glucose homeostasis and lipid utilization16-18. Activation of PPAR-γ by TZDs enhances peripheral glucose uptake, improves insulin sensitivity, reduces hepatic gluconeogenesis, and suppresses inflammatory mediators, thereby improving glycemic control in diabetic patients16,19. Although clinically approved TZDs such as pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are effective antidiabetic agents, their associated adverse effects have prompted the development of novel TZD derivatives with improved efficacy and safety profiles18,20. Consequently, structural modifications of the TZD scaffold have been extensively explored to design potent PPAR-γ modulators with enhanced antidiabetic potential20,21.

 

 

Pioglitazone                                                      Rosiglitazone

 

Somayeh Behrouz et al. designed and synthesized a series of novel 5-arylidene thiazolidinedione acetic acid 1,2-diol monoesters as potential antidiabetic agents. The synthesized compounds were characterized using various spectroscopic techniques and evaluated for their antidiabetic potential in streptozotocin-induced diabetic male Balb/C mice over four weeks. Most derivatives exhibited significant hypoglycemic activity compared to glibenclamide. Among them, compound 2c showed the most promising blood glucose-lowering effect without mortality. Molecular docking studies demonstrated a strong binding affinity of compound 2c towards the active site of the PPAR-γ receptor, supporting its mechanism as a potential PPAR-γ modulator. In silico ADMET and physicochemical studies of compounds 2a–2p revealed favorable drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic profiles. DFT analysis further demonstrated similarities between compound 2c and rosiglitazone, highlighting 2c as a potential lead candidate for diabetes therapy21. Mahendra Gowdru Srinivasa et al. synthesized and characterized a series of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives and evaluated their antidiabetic potential as PPAR-γ agonists. Molecular docking, MM-GBSA, and 200 ns molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated strong and stable binding interactions of compounds 3d, 3g, and 3h with the PPAR-γ receptor, comparable to pioglitazone. ADME analysis indicated favorable drug-likeness properties. In vitro studies, including MTT cytotoxicity and glucose uptake assays in L6 myoblast cells, revealed that compounds 3d, 3g, and 3h significantly enhanced glucose uptake with low cytotoxicity22.

Shriram D. Ranade et al. developed acetyl pyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile based benzylidene thiazolidinedione hybrids (5a–5j) targeting PPAR-γ using integrated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. Compounds 5b and 5f, containing 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 4-fluorobenzaldehyde substitutions, respectively, showed significant glucose uptake activity comparable to pioglitazone along with dose-dependent PPAR-γ activation. Both compounds improved glucose homeostasis and reversed insulin resistance in fructose-induced rats, while compound 5b exhibited superior pharmacokinetic properties with better half-life and elimination profile23. Mohd. Javed Naim et al. synthesized and evaluated a series of 2,4-thiazolidinedione based amide derivatives for antidiabetic activity. Among the synthesized compounds, 6c, 6e, 6m, and 6n showed significant antidiabetic potential, with compound 6c bearing a 4-chlorophenyl substituent exhibiting the highest activity and a 2.1-fold increase in PPAR-γ gene expression compared to pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. Compound 6c also demonstrated favorable biochemical parameters without hepatotoxicity or significant weight gain, highlighting its potential as a safer antidiabetic agent24. Mohd. Javed Naim et al. designed and synthesized thiazolidinedione-based benzene sulphonamide derivatives containing a pyrazole core and evaluated their antidiabetic activity. Compounds 7b, 7d, and 7p showed significant antidiabetic potential, with compound 7p containing a naphthalene moiety exhibiting the highest activity and a 1.9-fold increase in PPAR-γ gene expression compared to pioglitazone and rosiglitazone25.

2.2 TZDs as anticancer agents

TZD derivatives have subsequently demonstrated promising anticancer effects against a wide range of cancer cell lines, including breast, liver, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers26,27. The anticancer potential of TZDs is mediated through multiple mechanisms such as inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, suppression of angiogenesis, and the induction of intrinsic apoptotic pathways6,28. In addition to PPAR-γ-dependent actions, several TZD derivatives exhibit anticancer activity through PPAR-γ-independent mechanisms involving mitochondrial dysfunction, caspase activation, VEGFR-2 inhibition, HDAC inhibition, and disruption of survival signaling pathways6,29-31. Furthermore, structural modification of the TZD scaffold and hybridization with other bioactive pharmacophores have significantly enhanced their cytotoxic potency, selectivity, and multitarget activity, highlighting TZDs as promising scaffolds for the development of novel anticancer agents28-31.

Pouria Zarrin et al. designed and synthesized novel thiazolidinedione (TZD) derivatives and evaluated their anticancer activity against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Among the synthesized compounds, PZ-11 exhibited the most potent cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity, surpassing vincristine at lower concentrations. Gene expression studies revealed that PZ-11 induced apoptosis by downregulating antiapoptotic genes such as AIFM1, BAG3, and BIRC3 while upregulating pro-apoptotic markers including BAD, HRK, CASP10, and CASP14. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable binding interactions of PZ-11 with apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), supported by favorable ADMET properties. The study highlighted PZ-11 as a promising multitarget TZD-based anticancer lead with potential for breast cancer therapy through modulation of both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways28. Khaled El-Adl et al. designed and synthesized a series of 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives targeting the VEGFR-2 enzyme and evaluated their anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Among the synthesized compounds, 8f exhibited the most potent anticancer activity with IC50 values of 11.19, 8.99, and 7.10 μM against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells, respectively, showing activity comparable to sorafenib and doxorubicin against MCF-7 cells. Molecular docking studies revealed strong binding interactions with the VEGFR-2 active site, while VEGFR-2 inhibition assays demonstrated that compound 8f possessed the highest inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.22 μM)29.

Mohammed S. Taghour et al. designed and synthesized a new series of thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives targeting VEGFR-2 as potential anticancer agents. The synthesized compounds were evaluated against A549, Caco-2, HepG-2, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines, where compound 14a exhibited the most potent antiproliferative activity, particularly against Caco-2 and HepG-2 cells. VEGFR-2 kinase inhibition assays demonstrated significant inhibitory activity comparable to sorafenib. Further biological studies revealed that compound 14a effectively inhibited cancer cell migration and downregulated apoptosis-related markers, including Bcl-2, Survivin, and TGF. Molecular docking, MD simulation, and DFT studies confirmed stable binding interactions of 14a within the ATP-binding pocket of VEGFR-2, highlighting it as a promising lead compound for anticancer drug development30. Abdelgawad MA et al. designed and synthesized 12 novel thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives and evaluated their anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines targeting VEGFR-2. Among the synthesized compounds, 7c and 6c exhibited the most potent activity against MCF-7 (IC50 = 7.78 and 8.15 µM), HCT116 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.11 µM), and HepG2 (IC50 = 8.82 and 8.99 µM) cell lines, with better activity than sorafenib against HepG2 cells. These derivatives also showed strong VEGFR-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.08 µM), significant PPAR-γ binding affinity (IC50 = 0.296 and 0.300 µM), and potent insulin-secreting activity (EC50 = 0.70 µM), along with low toxicity toward normal VERO cells. Molecular docking and ADMET studies further supported their dual role as VEGFR-2 inhibitors and PPAR-γ agonists6.

A. Hamdi et al. designed and synthesized novel 5-arylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione hybrids and evaluated their antitumor activity against HePG2, HCT-116, MCF-7, PC3, and HeLa cancer cell lines. Compared to doxorubicin (IC50 = 4.17–8.87 μM) and SAHA (IC50 = 2.70–7.11 μM), compounds 18b, 18c, 18f, and 19d exhibited broad-spectrum antitumor activity against the selected cell lines with IC50 ranges of 3.16–24.14 μM. Compounds 18b and 18c showed potent HDAC inhibitory activity against HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC6, and HDAC8 comparable to Entinostat. The apoptosis assay and cell cycle arrest analysis showed that derivative 18b induced apoptosis. Molecular docking analysis of the most active compounds 18b and 18c revealed good fitting and proper interactions with the major amino residues in the HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC6, and HDAC8 binding sites. Based on these results, derivatives 18b and 18c are promising scaffolds for further modification and optimization to obtain potent antitumor agents with selective HDAC inhibitory activity31.

 


2.2 TZDs as anti-inflammatory agents

TZDs have attracted considerable interest for their anti-inflammatory effects beyond their antidiabetic activity. Activation of PPARγ suppresses the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and matrix metalloproteinases by modulating inflammatory signalling pathways including AP-1, NF-κB, STAT, and NFAT32-35. TZDs have demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory activity in various cell types and in animal models of inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and asthma33,34. However, certain studies have also reported pro-inflammatory effects of TZDs such as Rosiglitazone and troglitazone in specific cell types, suggesting that their anti-inflammatory mechanisms may be complex and cell-type dependent35-37. These recent findings indicate a modulatory role for PPARs in inflammation with potential therapeutic applications in chronic inflammatory diseases32.

Cleiton Diniz Barros et al. synthesized a series of arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives and evaluated their anti-inflammatory activity as potential Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma ligands. Among the synthesized compounds, compound 11 [3-(2-bromobenzyl)-5-(4-methanesulfonyl-benzylidene)-thiazolidine-2,4-dione] exhibited superior anti-inflammatory activity compared to the reference drug Rosiglitazone despite showing lower receptor affinity than rosiglitazone, suggesting that receptor affinity may not directly correlate with anti-inflammatory effects. Compound 9 also demonstrated significant in vivo anti-inflammatory activity despite not being confirmed as a direct PPARγ ligand. Furthermore, docking studies showed a good correlation with in vivo anti-inflammatory activity, supporting the potential of arylidene-thiazolidinediones as promising PPARγ-mediated anti-inflammatory agents35.

 

Amal M. Youssef et al. synthesized and evaluated a series of novel pyrazolyl-2,4-thiazolidinedione derivatives for their cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective activities. Among the synthesized compounds, derivatives 5a–c and 7b exhibited significant anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective potential with low cytotoxicity. In addition, compounds 5a–c inhibited the respiratory burst by targeting NADPH oxidase, thereby reducing the production of reactive oxygen species associated with inflammatory processes. Selected compounds (5a–c and 7b) further showed pronounced in vivo anti-inflammatory activity comparable to the reference drug Celecoxib in both acute and chronic inflammation models, along with excellent gastrointestinal safety and high tolerability in experimental animals. Among them, compound 5b showed superior activity in acute inflammation, whereas compound 5a was more effective against chronic inflammation36

Shankar Gharge et al. designed and synthesized novel thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives via Knövenagel condensation and evaluated their antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities. Among them, compound 13a exhibited significant blood glucose-lowering activity (108.5 ± 2.171 mg/dL), comparable to the standard drug Pioglitazone (101.66 ± 0.95 mg/dL). Additionally, compounds 7a and 13a demonstrated notable anti-inflammatory activity through COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition as well as strong antioxidant potential in DPPH and FRAP assays, surpassing standard ascorbic acid37.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes mellitus contributes to cancer development through chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and enhanced angiogenesis1,3,4. Current therapies often treat cancer and diabetes independently and are limited by toxicity, increased pill burden, poor patient compliance, limited target selectivity, and drug resistance2,4. Thiazolidinedione (TZD)-based derivatives have emerged as promising multifunctional scaffolds with significant therapeutic potential against diabetes, cancer, and inflammatory disorders6,7,8. Structural modification and molecular hybridization of the TZD nucleus with pharmacologically active moieties such as pyrazoles, quinazolinones, thiazoles, and sulfonamides have resulted in compounds with enhanced biological activity, target selectivity, and reduced toxicity. Numerous derivatives demonstrated potent antidiabetic activity through PPARγ modulation, anticancer effects via induction of apoptosis and inhibition of VEGFR-2 and HDAC enzymes, and anti-inflammatory properties through suppression of COX enzymes and inflammatory mediators22-34. Collectively, these findings highlight the versatility of TZD derivatives as valuable lead molecules for developing novel multifunctional therapeutic agents to treat diabetes-associated cancer and inflammation.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Future research on thiazolidinedione (TZD)-based derivatives should focus on developing safer and more selective molecules with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity. Molecular hybridization with diverse bioactive scaffolds may enhance multitarget therapeutic potential against diabetes, cancer, and inflammatory disorders. Greater emphasis on structure–activity relationship studies, computational drug design, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and AI-assisted approaches may further optimize biological activity and target specificity. In addition, extensive in vivo and clinical studies, along with nanotechnology-based targeted drug delivery systems, may improve the bioavailability, safety, and therapeutic applicability of TZD-based agents.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1674-85. doi:10.2337/dc10-0666.
  2. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62-9. doi:10.2337/dc10-S062.
  3. Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity. 2019;51(1):27-41. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025.
  4. Cignarelli A, Genchi VA, Caruso I, Natalicchio A, Perrini S, Laviola L, et al. Diabetes and cancer: Pathophysiological fundamentals of a ‘dangerous affair’. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;143:378-88. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.002.
  5. Nanjan MJ, Mohammed M, Kumar BR, Chandrasekar MJN. Thiazolidinediones as antidiabetic agents: A critical review. Bioorg Chem. 2018;77:548-67. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.02.009.
  6. Abdelgawad MA, El-Adl K, El-Hddad SSA, Elhady MM, Saleh NM, Khalifa MM, et al. Design, molecular docking, synthesis, anticancer and anti-hyperglycemic assessments of thiazolidine-2,4-diones bearing sulfonylthiourea moieties as potent VEGFR-2 inhibitors and PPARγ agonists. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(2):226. doi:10.3390/ph15020226.
  7. Asati V, Mahapatra DK, Bharti SK. Thiazolidine-2,4-diones as multi-targeted scaffold in medicinal chemistry: Potential anticancer agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;87:814-33. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.025.
  8. Straus DS, Glass CK. Anti-inflammatory actions of PPAR ligands: new insights on cellular and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(12):551-8. doi:10.1016/j.it.2007.09.003.
  9. Kumar H, Aggarwal N, Marwaha MG, Deep A, Chopra H, Matin MM, et al. Thiazolidin-2,4-dione scaffold: an insight into recent advances as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and hypoglycemic agents. Molecules. 2022;27(19):6763. doi:10.3390/molecules27196763.
  10. Tahlan S, Verma PK. Biological potential of thiazolidinedione derivatives of synthetic origin. Chem Cent J. 2017;11:130. doi:10.1186/s13065-017-0357-2.
  11. Haroun M, Petrou A, Tratrat C, Kolokotroni A, Fesatidou M, Zagaliotis P, et al. Discovery of 5-methylthiazole-thiazolidinone conjugates as potential anti-inflammatory agents: molecular target identification and in silico studies. Molecules. 2022;27(23):8137. doi:10.3390/molecules27238137.
  12. Lauritano C, Andersen JH, Hansen E, Albrigtsen M, Escalera L, Esposito F, et al. Bioactivity screening of microalgae for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, anti-diabetes, and antibacterial activities. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:68. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00068.
  13. Bhatti RS, Shah S, Krishan P, Sandhu JS. Recent pharmacological developments on rhodanines and 2,4-thiazolidinediones. Int J Med Chem. 2013;2013:793260. doi:10.1155/2013/793260.
  14. Lehrke M, Lazar MA. The many faces of PPARγ. Cell. 2005;123(6):993-999. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.026.
  15. Ahmadian M, Suh JM, Hah N, Liddle C, Atkins AR, Downes M, Evans RM. PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):557-566. doi:10.1038/nm.3159.
  16. F. Chiazza, M. Collino, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in glucose control, in: Mol. Nutr. Diabetes, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 105–114, https://doi. Org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801585-8.00009-9.
  17. F. Hassan, A. Nadeem, Z. Li, M. Javed, Q. Liu, J. Azhar, M.S. Rehman, K. Cui, S. ur Rehman, Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in energy Homeostasis of Dairy animals: Exploiting their modulation through Nutrigenomic interventions, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 12463, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212463.
  18. A.Lazou, E. Barlaka, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), in: Encycl. Signal. Mol., Springer New York, New York, NY, 2016, pp. 1–7, https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1 4614-6438-9_101829-1.
  19. Basak S, Murmu A, Matore BW, Roy PP, Singh J. Thiazolidinedione an auspicious scaffold as PPAR-γ agonist: its possible mechanism to manoeuvre against insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus. Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2024;11:100160.
  20. Bansal G, Thanikachalam PV, Maurya RK, Chawla P, Ramamurthy S. An overview on medicinal perspective of thiazolidine-2,4-dione: A remarkable scaffold in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Adv Res. 2020;23:163-205. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.008.
  21. Behrouz S, Soltani Rad MN, Ghasemi Najafabad A, Habibi H, Khoradmehr A, Behrouz M. Design, synthesis, antidiabetic, and in silico studies of 5-arylidene thiazolidinedione acetic acid 1,2-diol monoesters as new antidiabetic agents. J Mol Struct. 2026;1349:143759. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.143759.
  22. Srinivasa MG, Darshan S, Poojari S, Vikyath M, Pujar KG, Prabhakaran P, Sangamesh VC. Computational and experimental investigation of thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists for antidiabetic activity. J Mol Struct. 2025;1344:142861. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.142861.
  23. Ranade SD, Alegaon SG, Khatib NA, Gharge S, Kavalapure RS, Kumar BRP. Reversal of insulin resistance to combat type 2 diabetes mellitus by newer thiazolidinediones in fructose-induced insulin-resistant rats. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry [Internet]. 2024 Oct 5;280:116939. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article /pii/S0223523424008201.
  24. Naim MJ, Alam MJ, Nawaz F, Naidu VGM, Aaghaz S, Sahu M, Siddiqui N, Alam O. Synthesis, molecular docking and anti-diabetic evaluation of 2,4-thiazolidinedione-based amide derivatives. Bioorg Chem. 2017;73:24-36. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.05.003.
  25. Naim MJ, Alam O, Alam MJ, Hassan MQ, Siddiqui N, Naidu VGM, Alam MI. Design, synthesis and molecular docking of thiazolidinedione-based benzene sulphonamide derivatives containing pyrazole core as potential anti-diabetic agents. Bioorg Chem. 2015;59:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.12.006.
  26. Blanquicett C, Roman J, Hart CM. Thiazolidinediones as anti-cancer agents. Cancer Ther. 2008;6(A):25-34.
  27. Panigrahy D, Shen LQ, Kieran MW, Kaipainen A. Therapeutic potential of thiazolidinediones as anticancer agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2003;12(12):1925-1937. doi:10.1517/13543784.12.12.1925.
  28. Zarrin P, Gado S, Boroujeni AF, Gadaslı I, Bozkurt FZ, Cansaran-Duman D, Mutlu P, Ates-Alagoz Z. Design, synthesis, molecular docking, dynamics simulation, and biological evaluation of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives against breast cancer with apoptosis-inducing activity. ACS Omega. 2026;11:889-908. doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c08990.
  29. El-Adl K, El-Helby AGA, Sakr H, Eissa IH, El-Hddad SSA, Shoman FMIA. Design, synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer evaluations of 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives targeting VEGFR-2 enzyme. Bioorg Chem. 2021;114:105105. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105105.
  30. Taghour MS, Elkady H, Eldehna WM, et al. Design, synthesis, anti-proliferative evaluation, docking, and MD simulations studies of new thiazolidine-2,4-diones targeting VEGFR-2 and apoptosis pathway. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0276679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276679.
  31. Hamdi A, et al. Synthesis, antitumor, and apoptosis-inducing activities of novel 5-arylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives: Histone deacetylases inhibitory activity and molecular docking study. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;244:114827. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114827.
  32. Daynes RA, Jones DC. Emerging roles of PPARs in inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(10):748-59. doi:10.1038/nri912.
  33. Marx N, Mach F, Sauty A, Leung JH, Sarafi MN, Ransohoff RM, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activators inhibit IFN-gamma-induced expression of the T cell-active CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC in human endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2000;164(12):6503-8. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6503.
  34. Marx N, Kehrle B, Kohlhammer K, Grub M, Koenig W, Hombach V, et al. PPAR activators as antiinflammatory mediators in human T lymphocytes: implications for atherosclerosis and transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis. Circ Res. 2002;90(6):703-10. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000012568.16339.0A.
  35. Barros CD, Amato AA, de Oliveira TB, Iannini KBR, da Silva AL, da Silva TG, et al. Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of new arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-diones as Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma ligands. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;18(11):3805-3811. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2010.04.045.
  36. Youssef AM, White MS, Villanueva EB, El-Ashmawy IM, Klegeris A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazolyl-2,4-thiazolidinediones as anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(5):2019-2028. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2010.01.039.
  37. Gharge S, Alegaon SG, Ranade SD, Khatib NA, Kavalapure RS, Prashantha Kumar BR, et al. Design, synthesis of new 2,4-thiazolidinediones: In-silico, in-vivo anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory evaluation. Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2024;11:100154. doi:10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100154.0

Reference

  1. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1674-85. doi:10.2337/dc10-0666.
  2. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62-9. doi:10.2337/dc10-S062.
  3. Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity. 2019;51(1):27-41. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025.
  4. Cignarelli A, Genchi VA, Caruso I, Natalicchio A, Perrini S, Laviola L, et al. Diabetes and cancer: Pathophysiological fundamentals of a ‘dangerous affair’. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;143:378-88. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.002.
  5. Nanjan MJ, Mohammed M, Kumar BR, Chandrasekar MJN. Thiazolidinediones as antidiabetic agents: A critical review. Bioorg Chem. 2018;77:548-67. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.02.009.
  6. Abdelgawad MA, El-Adl K, El-Hddad SSA, Elhady MM, Saleh NM, Khalifa MM, et al. Design, molecular docking, synthesis, anticancer and anti-hyperglycemic assessments of thiazolidine-2,4-diones bearing sulfonylthiourea moieties as potent VEGFR-2 inhibitors and PPARγ agonists. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(2):226. doi:10.3390/ph15020226.
  7. Asati V, Mahapatra DK, Bharti SK. Thiazolidine-2,4-diones as multi-targeted scaffold in medicinal chemistry: Potential anticancer agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;87:814-33. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.025.
  8. Straus DS, Glass CK. Anti-inflammatory actions of PPAR ligands: new insights on cellular and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(12):551-8. doi:10.1016/j.it.2007.09.003.
  9. Kumar H, Aggarwal N, Marwaha MG, Deep A, Chopra H, Matin MM, et al. Thiazolidin-2,4-dione scaffold: an insight into recent advances as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and hypoglycemic agents. Molecules. 2022;27(19):6763. doi:10.3390/molecules27196763.
  10. Tahlan S, Verma PK. Biological potential of thiazolidinedione derivatives of synthetic origin. Chem Cent J. 2017;11:130. doi:10.1186/s13065-017-0357-2.
  11. Haroun M, Petrou A, Tratrat C, Kolokotroni A, Fesatidou M, Zagaliotis P, et al. Discovery of 5-methylthiazole-thiazolidinone conjugates as potential anti-inflammatory agents: molecular target identification and in silico studies. Molecules. 2022;27(23):8137. doi:10.3390/molecules27238137.
  12. Lauritano C, Andersen JH, Hansen E, Albrigtsen M, Escalera L, Esposito F, et al. Bioactivity screening of microalgae for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, anti-diabetes, and antibacterial activities. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:68. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00068.
  13. Bhatti RS, Shah S, Krishan P, Sandhu JS. Recent pharmacological developments on rhodanines and 2,4-thiazolidinediones. Int J Med Chem. 2013;2013:793260. doi:10.1155/2013/793260.
  14. Lehrke M, Lazar MA. The many faces of PPARγ. Cell. 2005;123(6):993-999. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.026.
  15. Ahmadian M, Suh JM, Hah N, Liddle C, Atkins AR, Downes M, Evans RM. PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):557-566. doi:10.1038/nm.3159.
  16. F. Chiazza, M. Collino, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in glucose control, in: Mol. Nutr. Diabetes, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 105–114, https://doi. Org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801585-8.00009-9.
  17. F. Hassan, A. Nadeem, Z. Li, M. Javed, Q. Liu, J. Azhar, M.S. Rehman, K. Cui, S. ur Rehman, Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in energy Homeostasis of Dairy animals: Exploiting their modulation through Nutrigenomic interventions, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 12463, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212463.
  18. A.Lazou, E. Barlaka, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), in: Encycl. Signal. Mol., Springer New York, New York, NY, 2016, pp. 1–7, https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1 4614-6438-9_101829-1.
  19. Basak S, Murmu A, Matore BW, Roy PP, Singh J. Thiazolidinedione an auspicious scaffold as PPAR-γ agonist: its possible mechanism to manoeuvre against insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus. Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2024;11:100160.
  20. Bansal G, Thanikachalam PV, Maurya RK, Chawla P, Ramamurthy S. An overview on medicinal perspective of thiazolidine-2,4-dione: A remarkable scaffold in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Adv Res. 2020;23:163-205. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.008.
  21. Behrouz S, Soltani Rad MN, Ghasemi Najafabad A, Habibi H, Khoradmehr A, Behrouz M. Design, synthesis, antidiabetic, and in silico studies of 5-arylidene thiazolidinedione acetic acid 1,2-diol monoesters as new antidiabetic agents. J Mol Struct. 2026;1349:143759. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.143759.
  22. Srinivasa MG, Darshan S, Poojari S, Vikyath M, Pujar KG, Prabhakaran P, Sangamesh VC. Computational and experimental investigation of thiazolidinedione derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists for antidiabetic activity. J Mol Struct. 2025;1344:142861. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.142861.
  23. Ranade SD, Alegaon SG, Khatib NA, Gharge S, Kavalapure RS, Kumar BRP. Reversal of insulin resistance to combat type 2 diabetes mellitus by newer thiazolidinediones in fructose-induced insulin-resistant rats. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry [Internet]. 2024 Oct 5;280:116939. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article /pii/S0223523424008201.
  24. Naim MJ, Alam MJ, Nawaz F, Naidu VGM, Aaghaz S, Sahu M, Siddiqui N, Alam O. Synthesis, molecular docking and anti-diabetic evaluation of 2,4-thiazolidinedione-based amide derivatives. Bioorg Chem. 2017;73:24-36. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.05.003.
  25. Naim MJ, Alam O, Alam MJ, Hassan MQ, Siddiqui N, Naidu VGM, Alam MI. Design, synthesis and molecular docking of thiazolidinedione-based benzene sulphonamide derivatives containing pyrazole core as potential anti-diabetic agents. Bioorg Chem. 2015;59:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.12.006.
  26. Blanquicett C, Roman J, Hart CM. Thiazolidinediones as anti-cancer agents. Cancer Ther. 2008;6(A):25-34.
  27. Panigrahy D, Shen LQ, Kieran MW, Kaipainen A. Therapeutic potential of thiazolidinediones as anticancer agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2003;12(12):1925-1937. doi:10.1517/13543784.12.12.1925.
  28. Zarrin P, Gado S, Boroujeni AF, Gadasl? I, Bozkurt FZ, Cansaran-Duman D, Mutlu P, Ates-Alagoz Z. Design, synthesis, molecular docking, dynamics simulation, and biological evaluation of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives against breast cancer with apoptosis-inducing activity. ACS Omega. 2026;11:889-908. doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c08990.
  29. El-Adl K, El-Helby AGA, Sakr H, Eissa IH, El-Hddad SSA, Shoman FMIA. Design, synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer evaluations of 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives targeting VEGFR-2 enzyme. Bioorg Chem. 2021;114:105105. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105105.
  30. Taghour MS, Elkady H, Eldehna WM, et al. Design, synthesis, anti-proliferative evaluation, docking, and MD simulations studies of new thiazolidine-2,4-diones targeting VEGFR-2 and apoptosis pathway. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0276679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276679.
  31. Hamdi A, et al. Synthesis, antitumor, and apoptosis-inducing activities of novel 5-arylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives: Histone deacetylases inhibitory activity and molecular docking study. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;244:114827. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114827.
  32. Daynes RA, Jones DC. Emerging roles of PPARs in inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(10):748-59. doi:10.1038/nri912.
  33. Marx N, Mach F, Sauty A, Leung JH, Sarafi MN, Ransohoff RM, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activators inhibit IFN-gamma-induced expression of the T cell-active CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC in human endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2000;164(12):6503-8. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6503.
  34. Marx N, Kehrle B, Kohlhammer K, Grub M, Koenig W, Hombach V, et al. PPAR activators as antiinflammatory mediators in human T lymphocytes: implications for atherosclerosis and transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis. Circ Res. 2002;90(6):703-10. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000012568.16339.0A.
  35. Barros CD, Amato AA, de Oliveira TB, Iannini KBR, da Silva AL, da Silva TG, et al. Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of new arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-diones as Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma ligands. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;18(11):3805-3811. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2010.04.045.
  36. Youssef AM, White MS, Villanueva EB, El-Ashmawy IM, Klegeris A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazolyl-2,4-thiazolidinediones as anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(5):2019-2028. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2010.01.039.
  37. Gharge S, Alegaon SG, Ranade SD, Khatib NA, Kavalapure RS, Prashantha Kumar BR, et al. Design, synthesis of new 2,4-thiazolidinediones: In-silico, in-vivo anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory evaluation. Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2024;11:100154. doi:10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100154.0

Photo
Neethu S.
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram

Photo
Seema Nair
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram

Neethu S.*, Seema Nair, Multitarget Therapeutic Potential of Thiazolidinedione-Based Derivatives in Cancer, Diabetes, and Inflammation: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 5222-5235. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20772536

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of a Polyherbal Anti-Ac...
Vijay Gadiwan , Ekta Waghmare, Shubham Shirsat , Om Ghuge, Sunil ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Sunscreen For UV Protection ...
Ritik Patel , Shivanand M. Patil, Manisha Rana...
Formulation and Evaluation of Sunscreen For UV Protection ...
Ritik Patel , Shivanand M. Patil, Manisha Rana...
Comparative UV Spectrophotometric Analysis of Different Brands of Paracetamol Ta...
Shivkanya Gadkar, Dr. P. N. Sable, Megha Hange, Anushka Shingade...