View Article

  • Introduction of Outcome Based Education in Pharmaceutical Education in India

  • 1,2Faculty of Pharmacy, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Merrut 250002.
    3Department of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Moradabad, 244102.

Abstract

Outcome-Based Education (OBE) is transforming the landscape of pharmaceutical education in India, shifting from content-centric teaching to a results-oriented approach. OBE emphasizes clear and measurable learning outcomes that align with the dynamic demands of the healthcare sector. This framework prioritizes skill development, critical thinking, and practical application, producing industry-ready pharmacy graduates. OBE's learner-centric approach fosters engagement and personalized learning experiences, enhancing academic performance and holistic development. By aligning with industry needs, OBE equips graduates with the necessary competencies for success in the pharmaceutical industry. However, implementing OBE requires overcoming challenges such as faculty training, curriculum alignment, and resource allocation. With effective communication and continuous evaluation, OBE has the potential to shape a generation of adaptable and impactful pharmacy professionals, contributing to advancements in healthcare and society's well-being.

Keywords

Outcome-Based Education, Pharmaceutical Education, India, Learner-Centric Approach, Industry-Relevant Graduates, Critical Thinking, Problem-Solving Skills, Continuous Improvement

Introduction

India's pharmaceutical education landscape is witnessing a transformative shift with the introduction of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) as a progressive and innovative framework. Traditionally, educational institutions in India have followed a content-centric approach, where the focus was primarily on delivering subject matter without a clear emphasis on the desired learning outcomes. However, with the realization that traditional methods might not be sufficient to meet the demands of the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical industry, OBE has gained traction as a solution-oriented approach that prioritizes skill development and practical application of knowledge.

The integration of OBE in pharmaceutical education marks a pivotal moment, as it aligns educational objectives with the dynamic and ever-changing demands of the healthcare sector. This approach is driven by the recognition that the industry requires graduates who possess not only a strong theoretical foundation but also the ability to apply their knowledge in real-world scenarios. OBE strives to bridge the gap between academia and industry, ensuring that pharmacy graduates are well-prepared to contribute meaningfully and effectively to the healthcare ecosystem.

At the core of Outcome-Based Education is the articulation of clear and measurable learning outcomes. These outcomes are carefully defined, taking into account the specific knowledge, skills, and competencies that students should possess upon completion of their pharmacy programs. By setting specific targets, OBE provides a roadmap for both educators and learners, guiding them throughout the learning process and allowing for continuous assessment and improvement.

The implementation of OBE in pharmaceutical education emphasizes the development of critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Unlike traditional teaching methods that often rely on rote memorization, OBE encourages students to analyze information critically, evaluate evidence, and propose evidence-based solutions to complex pharmaceutical challenges. This emphasis on higher-order thinking skills not only enriches the learning experience but also nurtures a generation of pharmacy professionals capable of addressing emerging healthcare issues with creativity and ingenuity.

Furthermore, Outcome-Based Education places considerable importance on experiential learning and practical exposure. Pharmacy students are encouraged to engage in hands-on experiences, such as internships, research projects, and clinical rotations, to apply their knowledge in real-life scenarios. This experiential learning approach not only enhances students' understanding of theoretical concepts but also fosters a deeper connection between academia and the pharmaceutical industry.

By incorporating OBE in pharmaceutical education, India aims to produce industry-ready graduates who possess a well-rounded skill set. Apart from technical knowledge, OBE also emphasizes the development of communication skills, teamwork, adaptability, and ethical decision-making. These transferable skills are highly sought after in the pharmaceutical job market, making OBE graduates more competitive and desirable to employers.

However, the introduction of Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education also comes with its share of challenges. One of the key challenges is the need for faculty development and training. Educators must adapt their instructional strategies to align with the principles of OBE, which may require a shift in their traditional teaching methodologies. Additionally, the assessment methods need to be revamped to ensure that they align with the specific learning outcomes and competencies identified under OBE.

Moreover, OBE implementation requires a significant investment in terms of time, resources, and infrastructure. Educational institutions may need to revise and redesign their curricula, develop appropriate learning materials, and invest in technology and facilities to support experiential learning opportunities effectively.

Literature Review:

2.1.1 Understanding Outcome-Based Education:

In recent years, Outcome-Based Education (OBE) has gained considerable attention as a progressive and effective educational approach across various academic disciplines. OBE fundamentally challenges traditional teaching methodologies by placing the primary focus on defining and achieving specific learning outcomes rather than merely disseminating content to students. This paradigm shift in educational philosophy has led to the reevaluation and redesign of curricula in different fields to ensure that learners are equipped with the necessary skills and competencies to thrive in their respective industries.

In the context of pharmaceutical education, Outcome-Based Education has emerged as a transformative force, revolutionizing the way pharmacy programs are structured and delivered. The core objective of OBE in pharmaceutical education is to clearly articulate the learning outcomes and competencies that students are expected to master by the time they complete their educational journey. Rather than relying solely on standardized tests or memorization of facts, OBE emphasizes the importance of practical application, critical thinking, problem-solving, and hands-on experiences.

One of the key aspects that sets OBE apart from conventional teaching methods is its alignment with real-world challenges and industry demands. By actively involving industry professionals and stakeholders in the curriculum development process, pharmaceutical educators can identify the skills and knowledge essential for students to excel in their future careers. This collaborative approach ensures that the education provided is relevant, up-to-date, and aligned with the rapidly evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry.

A hallmark feature of Outcome-Based Education in pharmacy is the clear articulation of program-level learning outcomes and the corresponding learning experiences that students will engage in to achieve those outcomes. This transparent and structured approach creates a clear pathway for students, guiding them through their academic journey and fostering a deeper sense of purpose in their studies.

OBE also emphasizes continuous assessment and feedback throughout the learning process. Instead of relying solely on final examinations, students are evaluated based on their demonstrated competencies and abilities in various authentic tasks and simulations. This continuous assessment model not only provides a more accurate measure of students' progress but also allows for personalized learning experiences tailored to individual needs and strengths.

Moreover, Outcome-Based Education encourages the development of transferable skills, such as communication, teamwork, leadership, and adaptability. These skills go beyond subject-specific knowledge and are highly valued by employers in the pharmaceutical industry. Graduates who have undergone OBE are better equipped to tackle complex challenges, work collaboratively in interdisciplinary teams, and adapt to the dynamic nature of the pharmaceutical sector.

Critics of Outcome-Based Education have raised concerns about potential challenges in implementing this approach effectively. Some argue that the focus on predefined outcomes might lead to a narrowing of the curriculum, neglecting important areas that are difficult to measure but crucial for a well-rounded education. Additionally, aligning with industry demands could inadvertently limit the exploration of innovative ideas and research that might shape the future of pharmaceutical science.

However, proponents of Outcome-Based Education counter these concerns by emphasizing the flexibility and adaptability of OBE. They argue that while predefined outcomes provide a guiding framework, educators still have the freedom to design diverse and engaging learning experiences that encourage curiosity and creativity. Furthermore, OBE can be iteratively improved based on feedback and evaluation, allowing for continuous refinement and enhancement of the educational process.

2.1.2 Key Aspects of Outcome-Based Education in Pharmaceutical Education:

  • Defining Clear Learning Outcomes: OBE begins with the identification of clear and measurable learning outcomes for pharmacy students. These outcomes encompass not only theoretical knowledge but also practical skills and professional competencies required in the pharmaceutical field.
  • Emphasis on Competency-Based Learning: OBE in pharmaceutical education prioritizes the development of competencies that align with industry needs. These competencies include critical thinking, problem-solving, effective communication, teamwork, ethical decision-making, and research capabilities.
  • Integration of Real-World Scenarios: OBE encourages the integration of real-world scenarios and case studies into the curriculum. This helps students apply their theoretical knowledge to practical situations, preparing them for the complexities of the pharmaceutical profession.
  • Authentic Assessment Methods: OBE employs authentic assessment methods that reflect real-life scenarios in the pharmaceutical industry. These assessments go beyond traditional exams and include projects, presentations, internships, and practical examinations.
  • Learner-Centric Approach: OBE is learner-centric, recognizing the diverse learning styles and abilities of pharmacy students. It allows for personalized learning experiences tailored to individual needs, fostering deeper understanding and engagement.

3.1   Significance in Pharmaceutical Education:

The integration of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in pharmaceutical education offers several significant advantages. Firstly, it ensures that graduates possess the essential knowledge, skills, and competencies demanded by the industry, empowering them to make valuable contributions to healthcare. OBE actively fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and practical skills, making graduates highly adaptable to the ever-changing landscape of the pharmaceutical sector.

Overall, the significance of Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education cannot be overstated. It brings numerous benefits to students, educators, and the pharmaceutical industry. By emphasizing specific learning outcomes and competencies, OBE transforms the conventional teaching approach, resulting in a more effective and relevant pharmaceutical education experience.

  • Industry-Relevant Graduates: OBE ensures that pharmacy graduates are well-equipped with the essential knowledge, skills, and competencies demanded by the pharmaceutical industry. By aligning educational objectives with industry needs, OBE bridges the gap between academia and the professional world, producing job-ready graduates who can readily contribute to the sector's growth and development.
  • Practical Application of Knowledge: OBE emphasizes the practical application of knowledge and skills. This hands-on approach enables pharmacy students to gain valuable experience in real-world scenarios, making them more adept at solving complex pharmaceutical problems and effectively implementing their knowledge in practice.
  • Personalized Learning: OBE allows for personalized learning experiences tailored to individual students' strengths and interests. Recognizing that learners have diverse aptitudes, OBE accommodates various learning styles, ensuring a more engaging and effective educational journey.
  • Continuous Improvement: OBE fosters a culture of continuous improvement in pharmaceutical education. Regular assessment and feedback enable educators to refine teaching methods and curricula, staying up-to-date with the latest advancements and industry requirements.
  • Enhanced Critical Thinking: By emphasizing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, OBE nurtures analytical minds among pharmacy students. Graduates emerge as proactive thinkers who can analyze complex pharmaceutical issues and propose innovative solutions, contributing to the advancement of the healthcare sector.
  • Student Engagement and Motivation: OBE promotes active student engagement and motivation. Involving students in the learning process and setting clear learning outcomes heighten their sense of ownership, leading to higher motivation and academic achievement.
  • Alignment with Accreditation Standards: OBE aligns with accreditation standards, ensuring that pharmaceutical education programs meet recognized benchmarks of quality and excellence. This alignment enhances the credibility of the educational institutions and fosters confidence among stakeholders.
  • Holistic Development: OBE not only focuses on academic knowledge but also on the development of soft skills and ethical values. Pharmacy students receive comprehensive training, making them well-rounded professionals with a sense of social responsibility.

4.1   Benefits of Outcome-Based Education:

Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in pharmaceutical education offers a wide range of significant benefits that have a positive impact on various stakeholders, including students, educators, and the pharmaceutical industry as a whole. By adopting an outcome-based approach, the focus shifts from simply delivering content to concentrating on specific learning outcomes and essential competencies that are crucial for a successful and fulfilling career in pharmacy.

One of the primary advantages of OBE is its emphasis on defining clear and measurable learning outcomes. This clarity in educational objectives ensures that pharmacy students understand what is expected of them and what they need to achieve throughout their educational journey. By aligning the curriculum with specific outcomes, educators can design learning experiences that are tailored to help students develop the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities required in the pharmaceutical industry.

Furthermore, OBE plays a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of education in pharmaceutical institutions. By aligning the educational process with industry demands and expectations, OBE ensures that graduates are well-prepared and equipped to tackle the challenges of the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape. As a result, the industry receives highly competent and industry-ready professionals who can contribute effectively to advancements in healthcare and pharmaceutical research.

In addition to academic excellence, OBE fosters the development of critical skills and competencies that are essential for success in the pharmaceutical sector. These competencies include critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, effective communication, teamwork, ethical decision-making, and research capabilities. By nurturing these skills, OBE cultivates well-rounded pharmacy professionals who can address complex issues, devise innovative solutions, and effectively collaborate with multidisciplinary healthcare teams.

Another significant advantage of OBE is its focus on practical application and experiential learning. Pharmacy students are exposed to real-world scenarios, case studies, and hands-on experiences, enabling them to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations. This practical exposure enhances their problem-solving skills, decision-making abilities, and adaptability, making them better prepared to handle the challenges they may encounter in their professional careers.

Moreover, Outcome-Based Education fosters a learner-centric environment. Students become active participants in their education, taking ownership of their learning process, setting personal goals, and monitoring their progress towards achieving the desired outcomes. This personalized learning approach promotes engagement, motivation, and a deeper understanding of the subject matter, ultimately leading to enhanced academic performance and professional growth.

Here are some key benefits of Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education:

  • Industry-Relevant Graduates: OBE ensures that pharmacy graduates possess the knowledge, skills, and competencies directly aligned with industry demands. This industry relevance enhances graduates' employability and prepares them to tackle the challenges and opportunities in the pharmaceutical sector effectively.
  • Practical Application of Knowledge: OBE emphasizes the practical application of theoretical knowledge. By engaging students in hands-on experiences, such as internships, case studies, and research projects, OBE equips them with the necessary skills to solve real-world pharmaceutical problems.
  • Enhancing Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills: OBE promotes critical thinking and problem-solving abilities among pharmacy students. Graduates are equipped to analyze complex pharmaceutical issues, make informed decisions, and propose innovative solutions.
  • Personalized Learning: OBE allows for personalized learning experiences that cater to individual students' strengths, interests, and learning styles. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter and enhances student engagement and motivation.
  • Continuous Improvement: OBE encourages a culture of continuous improvement in pharmaceutical education. Regular assessment and feedback enable educators to refine teaching methodologies, update curricula, and stay abreast of emerging trends and developments in the field.

Adapting to Evolving Healthcare Landscape: OBE equips pharmacy students with adaptable skills, making them well-prepared to thrive in the rapidly changing healthcare landscape. Graduates are better positioned to embrace new technologies, research advancements, and healthcare policies.

  • Holistic Development: Beyond academic knowledge, OBE promotes the development of soft skills, ethical values, and professional conduct. Pharmacy students emerge as well-rounded professionals, capable of effectively collaborating with healthcare teams and demonstrating social responsibility.
  • Accreditation and Recognition: Aligning with accreditation standards, OBE ensures that pharmaceutical education programs meet established benchmarks of quality and excellence. This alignment enhances the reputation of educational institutions and fosters confidence among stakeholders.
  • Engaged and Motivated Students: By involving students in setting and achieving learning outcomes, OBE increases student engagement and motivation. This active participation contributes to a positive and fulfilling learning experience.
  • Learner-Centric Approach: OBE places the learner at the center of the educational process, encouraging active participation, self-directed learning, and personal growth. Students take ownership of their learning, leading to a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
  • Alignment with Industry Needs: OBE enables the alignment of curricula with industry expectations, ensuring that graduates are equipped with relevant and up-to-date knowledge and skills. This enhances employability and facilitates a smoother transition into the pharmaceutical workforce.
  • Continuous Quality Improvement: OBE facilitates ongoing assessment and feedback, allowing educators to identify areas of improvement in the curriculum and teaching methods. It promotes a culture of continuous quality enhancement in pharmaceutical education.

5.1   Implementation Challenges:

The introduction of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in pharmaceutical education comes with its share of challenges. It involves a significant shift in how curricula are designed and teaching methods are employed. One of the primary challenges is providing proper training to faculty members so they can effectively implement OBE principles. Additionally, there might be resistance to change as educators adapt to this new approach.

Developing outcome-based curricula requires a careful alignment with the needs and demands of the pharmaceutical industry. This often calls for collaboration between educational institutions and industry experts to ensure that the curriculum remains relevant and up-to-date.

Another obstacle lies in creating authentic and competency-based assessments that accurately measure the achievement of desired learning outcomes. Designing such assessments can be complex and time-consuming.

To successfully implement OBE, adequate resource allocation is crucial. This includes providing the necessary technology and faculty support to facilitate the transition and sustain the new educational approach effectively.

Effective communication with all stakeholders, such as students, faculty, administrators, and industry partners, is essential. Clear and open communication is vital to gain support and understanding for the benefits and objectives of Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education. It helps build a collective effort towards successful implementation and ensures that everyone is on the same page regarding the advantages of this innovative educational approach.

Here are some of the key challenges faced in implementing Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education:

  • Faculty Training and Development: Successfully implementing OBE requires faculty members to undergo specialized training and professional development. Educators need to be familiar with outcome-oriented curriculum design, competency-based assessment methodologies, and effective teaching strategies to align with the principles of OBE.
  • Curriculum Design and Alignment: Developing outcome-based curricula demands a comprehensive understanding of the pharmaceutical industry's needs and the specific learning outcomes expected from graduates. Collaboration between academia and industry professionals is essential to ensure the curriculum aligns with the current and future demands of the pharmaceutical sector.
  • Assessment Strategies: Designing valid and reliable assessment strategies to measure the attainment of learning outcomes can be challenging. Faculty must develop assessment tools that accurately reflect students' proficiency in the desired competencies while providing constructive feedback for improvement.
  • Resource Allocation: Implementing OBE may require additional resources, including faculty training, educational technology, and infrastructure. Adequate resource allocation is crucial to support the transition to outcome-based curricula effectively.
  • Stakeholder Communication: Effective communication with all stakeholders, including students, faculty, administrators, and industry partners, is vital for successful OBE implementation. Transparent and regular communication ensures everyone is aware of the objectives and benefits of the new approach.
  • Time and Planning: Transitioning to an outcome-based approach requires careful planning and time investment. It may take time for faculty and students to adapt to the new methodologies and embrace the changes in the learning process.
  • Assessing Soft Skills: Evaluating soft skills, such as communication, teamwork, and leadership, can be more complex than assessing theoretical knowledge. Faculty need to develop appropriate assessment methods to gauge these skills accurately.
  • Overcoming Resistance to Change: Resistance to change from faculty or institutional leaders can pose a significant challenge in implementing OBE. Convincing all stakeholders of the benefits and necessity of OBE may require robust advocacy and support.
  • Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Ensuring that OBE aligns with accreditation standards and quality assurance measures can be demanding. Meeting the requirements of accrediting bodies while maintaining the integrity of OBE may require careful balancing.
  • Ongoing Evaluation and Improvement: The continuous evaluation and improvement of the outcome-based approach are vital to its success. Faculty must regularly assess the effectiveness of the educational methods and adjust them as needed to optimize learning outcomes.

6.1   CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, the integration of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in pharmaceutical education marks a transformative shift towards a more progressive and effective learning framework. OBE addresses the shortcomings of traditional content-centric approaches by prioritizing specific and measurable learning outcomes that align with the dynamic demands of the healthcare sector. By focusing on skill development, critical thinking, and practical application of knowledge, OBE prepares pharmacy graduates to be industry-ready professionals capable of tackling real-world challenges.

One of the key strengths of OBE lies in its emphasis on competency-based learning, experiential education, and continuous assessment. Pharmacy students benefit from hands-on experiences, authentic assessments, and personalized learning approaches that foster engagement, motivation, and deeper understanding. The learner-centric environment encourages students to take ownership of their education, leading to better academic performance and holistic development.

OBE's alignment with industry needs ensures that pharmacy graduates possess the necessary knowledge and skills required by the pharmaceutical industry, enhancing their employability and value to employers. Furthermore, the emphasis on transferable skills, such as communication, teamwork, and ethical decision-making, prepares graduates to adapt to the evolving healthcare landscape and contribute meaningfully to interdisciplinary healthcare teams.

However, the implementation of OBE in pharmaceutical education comes with its challenges, including faculty training, curriculum alignment, and resource allocation. Effective communication and collaboration among stakeholders are crucial to overcoming resistance to change and gaining support for this innovative educational approach.

Overall, Outcome-Based Education in pharmaceutical education offers significant benefits to students, educators, and the pharmaceutical industry. By producing industry-relevant graduates who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and ethical professionals, OBE ensures that the future of pharmaceutical education is adaptive, impactful, and aligned with the needs of the healthcare ecosystem. With ongoing evaluation and continuous improvement, OBE has the potential to shape a generation of pharmacy professionals who will lead advancements in healthcare and contribute to the well-being of society as a whole.

7.1   Summary:

Outcome-Based Education (OBE) is transforming pharmaceutical education in India by shifting from content-centric teaching to a results-oriented approach. OBE focuses on defining clear and measurable learning outcomes aligned with industry needs. It emphasizes skill development, critical thinking, and practical application to produce industry-ready pharmacy graduates. The learner-centric approach fosters engagement and personalized learning experiences, enhancing academic performance and holistic development. However, implementing OBE requires overcoming challenges such as faculty training, curriculum alignment, and resource allocation. With effective communication and continuous evaluation, OBE has the potential to shape adaptable and impactful pharmacy professionals, contributing to advancements in healthcare and societal well-being.

REFERENCES

  1. Takahashi H, Kosano H. [Introduction of outcome-based education in pharmaceutical education in Japan]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2015;135(3):339-43. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00206-2. PMID: 25759038.
  2. Akaike A. [Contribution to the Development of Pharmaceutical Education in Six-year and Four-year Programs]. YakugakuZasshi. 2018;138(9):1127-1133. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00097. PMID: 30175756.
  3. Skowron A, Dymek J, Go?da A, Polak W. Are We Ready to Implement Competence-Based Teaching in Pharmacy Education in Poland? Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 May 9;5(2):25. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020025. PMID: 28970437; PMCID: PMC5597150.
  4. Yamashita M. [Approach to Starting Clinical Pharmacy Practice Experience Based on the Model Core Curriculum for Pharmacy Education (2013 Version) in Hokkaido Prefecture]. YakugakuZasshi. 2021;141(3):289-291. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00206. PMID: 33642493.
  5. Gill JL, Mills MJ, Wharton GA, Kanavos PG. The future of oncology policy. J Cancer Policy. 2022 Dec;34:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100352. Epub 2022 Aug 8. PMID: 35952940.
  6. Oku N. [The Role of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan in Advancing of Clinical Pharmacy Research]. YakugakuZasshi. 2019;139(3):401-404. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00186-2. PMID: 30828018.
  7. Yamada T. [The Near Future of Pharmaceutical Education as Higher Education: Concepts at the Heart of the Curriculum]. YakugakuZasshi. 2022;142(8):799-812. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.22-00004-1. PMID: 35908941.
  8. Kiuchi Y, Masuda Y, Kamei D, Kogo M, Nakamura A. [Advanced curriculum for clinical assessment and skill in new age pharmacist education]. YakugakuZasshi. 2013;133(2):231-41. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.12-00250-2. PMID: 23370519.
  9. Lhoste F. Médicament : économie de la confiance et contrat de résultats [Trust-based economics with medicine outcome-based pricing]. Ann Pharm Fr. 2013 Sep;71(5):279-84. French. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12. PMID: 24075698.
  10.  Sato E. [Design of spiral curriculum for pharmacy students to reach the outcome]. YakugakuZasshi. 2015;135(3):345-7. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00206-3. PMID: 25759039.
  11. Peng W, Wang S. Online-Offline Teaching for Bio-Pharmaceutical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case Study of Advanced Mathematics in Application-Oriented Universities of China. Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;10:911117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911117. PMID: 35910908; PMCID: PMC9330376.
  12. Lazerson J, Rosenthal J, Glaubensklee C, Hunt T, Morgenstern B, Pamidimukkala J, Penn DM, Rosenthal K, Sarsekeyeva M, Wragg S. Adaptation of the Roseman 6-Point Mastery Learning Model to the College of Medicine Program. J Med EducCurric Dev. 2018 Oct 4;5:2382120518803111. doi: 10.1177/2382120518803111. PMID: 30302395; PMCID: PMC6172933.
  13. Livet M, Blanchard C, Richard C, Sheppard K, Yannayon M, Sorensen T, McClurg MR. Measuring implementation of medication optimization services: Development and validation of an implementation outcomes questionnaire. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1623-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 6. PMID: 33526353.
  14. Yasuhara T, Sone T, Kohno T, Ogita K. [Concept extraction of graduate research by modified grounded theory approach and creating of rubric oriented to performance evaluation]. YakugakuZasshi. 2015;135(1):99-105. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00215-4. PMID: 25743905.
  15. Dong F, Liu X, Yu Z, Gu Y, Zhang L, Tang W. [Integration of innovation & entrepreneurship concept with the teaching practice of biochemistry experiment]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng XueBao. 2021 Jul 25;37(7):2581-2588. Chinese. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.200751. PMID: 34327923.
  16. Sukkha S, Supapaan T, Meesawatsom P. Evaluation of interactive teaching strategies and learning outcomes on the topic of kidney pharmacotherapy. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Mar;15(3):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 6. PMID: 37029075.
  17. Vicens C, Leiva A, Bejarano F, Sempere-Verdú E, Rodríguez-Rincón RM, Fiol F, Mengual M, Ajenjo-Navarro A, Do Pazo F, Mateu C, Folch S, Alegret S, Coll JM, Martín-Rabadán M, Socias I. Evaluation of a multicomponent intervention consisting of education and feedback to reduce benzodiazepine prescriptions by general practitioners: The BENZORED hybrid type 1 cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022 May 6;19(5):e1003983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003983. PMID: 35522626; PMCID: PMC9075619.
  18. Keene R. Educating students in a university museum environment: the Adler Museum of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Med Secoli. 2009;21(1):255-75. PMID: 20481369.
  19. Lee KW, Machado MR, Wenzel MM, Gagnon JM, Calomo JM. An advanced professional pharmacy experience in a community setting using an experiential manual. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Apr 15;70(2):42. doi: 10.5688/aj700242. PMID: 17149421; PMCID: PMC1636932.
  20. Mukesh S. Outcome-based learning: an overview. InProceedings of the International Conference on Best Innovative Teaching Strategies (ICON-BITS 2021) 2022 Feb 4.
  21. Yen KP, Sekar M, Ansari MT. Developing an outcome-based pharmaceutical science curriculum: An evaluation based on triangulation method. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2016 Oct 1;50(4):534-41.
  22. Nash RE, Chalmers L, Brown N, Jackson S, Peterson G. An international review of the use of competency standards in undergraduate pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education. 2015 Jun 18;15.
  23. Shirakawa S. The evaluation of clinical problem based learning and small group discussion in the outcome-based education in revised pharmacy curriculum. Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy. 2019 Jan;8:15-21.
  24. Ramamurthy S, Er HM, Devi Nadarajah V, Radhakrishnan AK. Medical students’ orientation toward lifelong learning in an outcome-based curriculum and the lessons learnt. Medical teacher. 2021 May 4;43(sup1):S6-11.
  25. Graebe J. Continuing professional development: Utilizing competency-based education and the American Nurses Credentialing Center outcome-based continuing education model©. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2019 Mar 1;50(3):100-2.
  26. Hsu LL, Ueng RS, Hsieh SI. An outcome-based educational intervention to improve nursing students’ knowledge and competencies in oncology nursing: a randomized controlled Trial. Contemporary Nurse. 2019 Sep 3;55(4-5):391-407.
  27. Tan K, Chong MC, Subramaniam P, Wong LP. The effectiveness of outcome based education on the competencies of nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse education today. 2018 May 1;64:180-9.
  28. Guggari S, Okoye K, Abraham A. Review of Challenges and Best Practices for Outcome Based Education: An Exploratory Outlook on Main Contributions and Research Topics. InInternational Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications 2022 Dec 15 (pp. 621-639). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  29. Vanka A, Wali O, Akondi BR, Vanka S, Ravindran S. OSCE-A New Assessment Method for Pharmaceutical Education. Indian J Pharm Educ. 2018 Oct 1;1(52):4.
  30. Er HM, Nadarajah VD, Chen YS, Misra S, Perera J, Ravindranath S, Hla YY. Twelve tips for institutional approach to outcome-based education in health professions programmes. Medical Teacher. 2021 May 4;43(sup1):S12-7.
  31. Ohtani H. Unique perspectives of Pharmacy Education in Japan—Core Curriculum and Some Examples of Advanced Education—. Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy. 2021 Jan;10:31-4.
  32. Srivastava SK, Agnihotri K. A study on modern teaching pedagogy with special reference to outcome-based education system. International Journal of Business Excellence. 2022;26(1):95-114.

Reference

  1. Takahashi H, Kosano H. [Introduction of outcome-based education in pharmaceutical education in Japan]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2015;135(3):339-43. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00206-2. PMID: 25759038.
  2. Akaike A. [Contribution to the Development of Pharmaceutical Education in Six-year and Four-year Programs]. YakugakuZasshi. 2018;138(9):1127-1133. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00097. PMID: 30175756.
  3. Skowron A, Dymek J, Go?da A, Polak W. Are We Ready to Implement Competence-Based Teaching in Pharmacy Education in Poland? Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 May 9;5(2):25. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020025. PMID: 28970437; PMCID: PMC5597150.
  4. Yamashita M. [Approach to Starting Clinical Pharmacy Practice Experience Based on the Model Core Curriculum for Pharmacy Education (2013 Version) in Hokkaido Prefecture]. YakugakuZasshi. 2021;141(3):289-291. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00206. PMID: 33642493.
  5. Gill JL, Mills MJ, Wharton GA, Kanavos PG. The future of oncology policy. J Cancer Policy. 2022 Dec;34:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100352. Epub 2022 Aug 8. PMID: 35952940.
  6. Oku N. [The Role of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan in Advancing of Clinical Pharmacy Research]. YakugakuZasshi. 2019;139(3):401-404. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00186-2. PMID: 30828018.
  7. Yamada T. [The Near Future of Pharmaceutical Education as Higher Education: Concepts at the Heart of the Curriculum]. YakugakuZasshi. 2022;142(8):799-812. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.22-00004-1. PMID: 35908941.
  8. Kiuchi Y, Masuda Y, Kamei D, Kogo M, Nakamura A. [Advanced curriculum for clinical assessment and skill in new age pharmacist education]. YakugakuZasshi. 2013;133(2):231-41. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.12-00250-2. PMID: 23370519.
  9. Lhoste F. Médicament : économie de la confiance et contrat de résultats [Trust-based economics with medicine outcome-based pricing]. Ann Pharm Fr. 2013 Sep;71(5):279-84. French. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12. PMID: 24075698.
  10.  Sato E. [Design of spiral curriculum for pharmacy students to reach the outcome]. YakugakuZasshi. 2015;135(3):345-7. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00206-3. PMID: 25759039.
  11. Peng W, Wang S. Online-Offline Teaching for Bio-Pharmaceutical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case Study of Advanced Mathematics in Application-Oriented Universities of China. Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;10:911117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911117. PMID: 35910908; PMCID: PMC9330376.
  12. Lazerson J, Rosenthal J, Glaubensklee C, Hunt T, Morgenstern B, Pamidimukkala J, Penn DM, Rosenthal K, Sarsekeyeva M, Wragg S. Adaptation of the Roseman 6-Point Mastery Learning Model to the College of Medicine Program. J Med EducCurric Dev. 2018 Oct 4;5:2382120518803111. doi: 10.1177/2382120518803111. PMID: 30302395; PMCID: PMC6172933.
  13. Livet M, Blanchard C, Richard C, Sheppard K, Yannayon M, Sorensen T, McClurg MR. Measuring implementation of medication optimization services: Development and validation of an implementation outcomes questionnaire. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1623-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 6. PMID: 33526353.
  14. Yasuhara T, Sone T, Kohno T, Ogita K. [Concept extraction of graduate research by modified grounded theory approach and creating of rubric oriented to performance evaluation]. YakugakuZasshi. 2015;135(1):99-105. Japanese. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00215-4. PMID: 25743905.
  15. Dong F, Liu X, Yu Z, Gu Y, Zhang L, Tang W. [Integration of innovation & entrepreneurship concept with the teaching practice of biochemistry experiment]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng XueBao. 2021 Jul 25;37(7):2581-2588. Chinese. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.200751. PMID: 34327923.
  16. Sukkha S, Supapaan T, Meesawatsom P. Evaluation of interactive teaching strategies and learning outcomes on the topic of kidney pharmacotherapy. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Mar;15(3):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 6. PMID: 37029075.
  17. Vicens C, Leiva A, Bejarano F, Sempere-Verdú E, Rodríguez-Rincón RM, Fiol F, Mengual M, Ajenjo-Navarro A, Do Pazo F, Mateu C, Folch S, Alegret S, Coll JM, Martín-Rabadán M, Socias I. Evaluation of a multicomponent intervention consisting of education and feedback to reduce benzodiazepine prescriptions by general practitioners: The BENZORED hybrid type 1 cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022 May 6;19(5):e1003983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003983. PMID: 35522626; PMCID: PMC9075619.
  18. Keene R. Educating students in a university museum environment: the Adler Museum of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Med Secoli. 2009;21(1):255-75. PMID: 20481369.
  19. Lee KW, Machado MR, Wenzel MM, Gagnon JM, Calomo JM. An advanced professional pharmacy experience in a community setting using an experiential manual. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Apr 15;70(2):42. doi: 10.5688/aj700242. PMID: 17149421; PMCID: PMC1636932.
  20. Mukesh S. Outcome-based learning: an overview. InProceedings of the International Conference on Best Innovative Teaching Strategies (ICON-BITS 2021) 2022 Feb 4.
  21. Yen KP, Sekar M, Ansari MT. Developing an outcome-based pharmaceutical science curriculum: An evaluation based on triangulation method. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education & Research. 2016 Oct 1;50(4):534-41.
  22. Nash RE, Chalmers L, Brown N, Jackson S, Peterson G. An international review of the use of competency standards in undergraduate pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education. 2015 Jun 18;15.
  23. Shirakawa S. The evaluation of clinical problem based learning and small group discussion in the outcome-based education in revised pharmacy curriculum. Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy. 2019 Jan;8:15-21.
  24. Ramamurthy S, Er HM, Devi Nadarajah V, Radhakrishnan AK. Medical students’ orientation toward lifelong learning in an outcome-based curriculum and the lessons learnt. Medical teacher. 2021 May 4;43(sup1):S6-11.
  25. Graebe J. Continuing professional development: Utilizing competency-based education and the American Nurses Credentialing Center outcome-based continuing education model©. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2019 Mar 1;50(3):100-2.
  26. Hsu LL, Ueng RS, Hsieh SI. An outcome-based educational intervention to improve nursing students’ knowledge and competencies in oncology nursing: a randomized controlled Trial. Contemporary Nurse. 2019 Sep 3;55(4-5):391-407.
  27. Tan K, Chong MC, Subramaniam P, Wong LP. The effectiveness of outcome based education on the competencies of nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse education today. 2018 May 1;64:180-9.
  28. Guggari S, Okoye K, Abraham A. Review of Challenges and Best Practices for Outcome Based Education: An Exploratory Outlook on Main Contributions and Research Topics. InInternational Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications 2022 Dec 15 (pp. 621-639). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  29. Vanka A, Wali O, Akondi BR, Vanka S, Ravindran S. OSCE-A New Assessment Method for Pharmaceutical Education. Indian J Pharm Educ. 2018 Oct 1;1(52):4.
  30. Er HM, Nadarajah VD, Chen YS, Misra S, Perera J, Ravindranath S, Hla YY. Twelve tips for institutional approach to outcome-based education in health professions programmes. Medical Teacher. 2021 May 4;43(sup1):S12-7.
  31. Ohtani H. Unique perspectives of Pharmacy Education in Japan—Core Curriculum and Some Examples of Advanced Education—. Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy. 2021 Jan;10:31-4.
  32. Srivastava SK, Agnihotri K. A study on modern teaching pedagogy with special reference to outcome-based education system. International Journal of Business Excellence. 2022;26(1):95-114.

Photo
Panshul Chauhan
Corresponding author

Faculty of Pharmacy, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Merrut 250002.

Photo
Sokindra Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Pharmacy, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Merrut 250002.

Photo
Ashu Mittal
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Moradabad, 244102.

Chauhan Panshul*, Kumar Sokindra, Mittal Ashu, Introduction of Outcome Based Education in Pharmaceutical Education in India, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 1602-1616 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17865942

More related articles
A Review on Curcumin-Based Copper Nanoparticle Loa...
Nidha V. P., Hani Jaleel V., Shahala Sharin, Shahana Shirin KM., ...
Standardization of Green Tea Extract: An Overview ...
Sakshi Dhotre, Dr. T. K Kedar, Sanjay K. Bais, ...
Related Articles
Comparative Evaluation of New-Generation Anticancer Drugs for Improved Patient O...
Dona Sajan, Dr. Vinuth Chikkamath, J. S. Venkatesh, Feba. G. Jose, Ferina U., Nashreennisa Begum, ...
A Focused Review and Comparative Analysis of Molecular Docking Strategies and So...
Suraj Chilkawar, Dr. Dinesh Chaple, Sneha Tidke, Ayush Umare, Sumit Raut, Shreyash Virutkar, ...
Nutraceutical Based Protein Rich Powder...
Yamini Bisen, Sakshi Edve, Bhagyashri Bhure, Atharva Patil, B. V. Phad, ...
A Review on Curcumin-Based Copper Nanoparticle Loaded Cream...
Nidha V. P., Hani Jaleel V., Shahala Sharin, Shahana Shirin KM., Suhaila N., Nishad KM., Sirajudheen...
More related articles
A Review on Curcumin-Based Copper Nanoparticle Loaded Cream...
Nidha V. P., Hani Jaleel V., Shahala Sharin, Shahana Shirin KM., Suhaila N., Nishad KM., Sirajudheen...
A Review on Curcumin-Based Copper Nanoparticle Loaded Cream...
Nidha V. P., Hani Jaleel V., Shahala Sharin, Shahana Shirin KM., Suhaila N., Nishad KM., Sirajudheen...