We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani
This study focuses on the novel formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal gel-based body wash incorporating Hylocereus undatus (dragon fruit) extract. Dragon fruit is rich in bioactive compounds such as vitamin C, flavonoids, polyphenols, and betalains, which provide antioxidant, moisturizing, and skin-protective properties. The aim of this work is to develop a natural, safe, and effective herbal body wash as an alternative to synthetic surfactant-based cleansers. Objective: The objective of the study is to formulate a stable polyherbal gel body wash using dragon fruit extract and evaluate its physicochemical properties, skin compatibility, cleansing efficiency, and antioxidant potential. Methods: The gel formulation was prepared using suitable natural gelling agents, mild surfactants, preservatives, and polyherbal extracts including dragon fruit. The formulated body wash was evaluated for pH, viscosity, spreadability, foam height and stability, washability, and stability studies. Antioxidant activity was assessed using standard in vitro methods, and skin irritation potential was also evaluated. Results: The formulated gel body wash showed acceptable physicochemical characteristics with a skin-friendly pH, good viscosity, and stable foam formation. The product demonstrated effective cleansing ability along with good spreadability and stability under different storage conditions. Antioxidant activity confirmed the beneficial effect of dragon fruit extract, and no skin irritation was observed, indicating its safety for topical application. Conclusion: The study concludes that the developed polyherbal gel body wash containing dragon fruit extract is a promising natural cosmetic formulation with effective cleansing, antioxidant, and skin-friendly properties. It can serve as a safe alternative to conventional chemical-based body washes, with potential for further optimization and clinical evaluation.
Personal hygiene is an essential aspect of daily life, and body washes are widely used cosmetic products for maintaining skin cleanliness and preventing the accumulation of dirt, oil, sweat, and microorganisms on the skin surface. With increasing awareness about skincare and personal grooming, the demand for body wash products has significantly grown in both urban and rural populations. However, most commercially available body washes are formulated using synthetic surfactants, preservatives, and artificial fragrances, which, although effective in cleansing, may lead to undesirable side effects such as skin dryness, irritation, allergic reactions, and disruption of the natural skin barrier when used repeatedly over time.
The human skin acts as a protective barrier against environmental pollutants, microbial infection, and dehydration. Therefore, it is important that cleansing products maintain the natural pH of the skin and do not strip away essential oils. In recent years, there has been a shift in consumer preference toward herbal and natural cosmetic products due to their perceived safety, biodegradability, and therapeutic benefits. Herbal formulations are considered more compatible with human skin as they are derived from natural sources and often contain bioactive compounds that provide additional skincare benefits beyond cleansing.
Plant-based cosmetic formulations are gaining importance in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries because of their antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and moisturizing properties. These properties are mainly attributed to the presence of phytochemicals such as flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, phenols, vitamins, and essential fatty acids. Such compounds not only help in cleansing but also in protecting the skin from oxidative stress and premature aging caused by free radicals and environmental exposure such as UV radiation and pollution.
In this context, dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus), also known as pitaya, has emerged as a valuable natural ingredient for cosmetic applications. It is rich in vitamin C, betalains, flavonoids, and polyphenolic compounds, which contribute to its strong antioxidant and skin-protective activity. Vitamin C plays a key role in collagen synthesis and skin brightening, while betalains and polyphenols help neutralize free radicals and reduce oxidative damage. Additionally, dragon fruit has moisturizing properties that help in maintaining skin hydration and improving overall skin texture. Its gentle nature makes it suitable for use in cosmetic formulations, especially for sensitive skin types.
The concept of polyherbal formulation involves the combination of multiple plant extracts to achieve enhanced therapeutic and cosmetic effects compared to a single herb. In body wash formulations, the use of polyherbal ingredients can improve cleansing efficiency while simultaneously providing nourishment and protection to the skin. Gel-based formulations are particularly preferred due to their smooth consistency, ease of application, good spreadability, aesthetic appeal, and ability to incorporate a wide range of herbal extracts and active compounds. Moreover, gel formulations are generally less irritating compared to harsh liquid surfactant systems.Despite the availability of numerous herbal cosmetic products in the market, there is still a need for scientifically validated formulations that combine effectiveness, stability, safety, and consumer acceptability. Therefore, the present study is focused on the novel formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal gel-based body wash using Hylocereus undatus (dragon fruit) extract. The study aims to develop a stable and effective herbal cleansing product and evaluate its physicochemical properties, skin compatibility, antioxidant activity, and overall performance.
This research contributes to the growing field of herbal cosmetics by exploring the potential of dragon fruit as a key functional ingredient in body wash formulations. The development of such natural products supports the demand for safer, eco-friendly, and skin-friendly alternatives to conventional synthetic personal care products while also promoting the utilization of plant-based resources in cosmetic science.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fresh Dragon Fruit was purchased from Delhi market Aloe vera neem obtained from Botanical garden of DJPS college of pharmacy Pathri. India. Coaca betain, castile soap glycerine, orange oil xanthan gum citric acid sodium benzoate were obtained from S K Enterprises Pune, Maharashtra. All other chemicals and reagents used in the study were analytical grade
ANALYTICAL METHOD
The extract of dragon fruit were analysed for various parameter Organoleptic Evaluation Morphological study (shape, size, color) Microscopic examination Determination of pH
Solubility Studies Phytochemical Screening Compatibility Study Moisture Content (Loss on Drying) various parameters are used to study the varius evaluation parameters.
PREPARATION OF METHOD
Method of Preparation- Step 1:collection and preparation of powder : Fresh leaves of neem are collected and dried them under the sunlight for 24 hours. Also collect the dragon fruit and aloevera. Preparation of powder : triturate dried leaves of neem in mortar pestle and aloe vera leaves are also dried for 3 days for trituration
Step 2: maceration: Dragon fruit was taken and cut it and separate its pulp material then boil the pulp for 20-30 minutes and cool it. filter it by using sintered glass filter. Then filtered extract is collect. powder of neem and aloe vera is mix and macerated with rose water for 5-7 days, all extract is filtered and stored it for further formulation
Step 3: preparation of bodywash: Take 53.2Ml of purified water and add 0.7Gm of xanthum gum was stirred, Add 6Ml glycerin, surfactants castile soap and coca betaine and extract were added sequentially. For better appearance and fragrance 0.5Ml Orange oil,2Ml of food color was added.4ml of Citric acid was added to adjust PH of formulation and 0.5gm of sodium benzoate was added for preserved the formulation. This formulation was kept at room temperature to stabilize.
Table No 1:Formulation and Devlopement
|
Sr. No. |
Ingredient |
Quantity |
Function |
|
1 |
Dragon fruit extract |
7.5 mL |
Antioxidant, skin brightening |
|
2 |
Aloe vera gel/extract |
8 mL |
Soothing, moisturizing |
|
3 |
Neem extract |
6 mL |
Antibacterial, antifungal |
|
4 |
Coca betaine |
10 mL |
Mild surfactant, foam booster |
|
5 |
Castile soap |
8 mL |
Primary cleansing base |
|
6 |
Glycerin |
6 mL |
Humectant (moisturizer) |
|
7 |
Xanthan gum |
0.7 g |
Gel thickener |
|
8 |
Orange oil |
0.5 mL |
Fragrance + mild antimicrobial |
|
9 |
Citric acid solution |
4mL |
pH adjustment (5.5–6.5) |
|
10 |
Sodium benzoate |
0.5 g |
Preservative |
|
11 |
Food colour |
2mL |
Aesthetic appearance |
|
12 |
Purified water |
Up to 100 mL |
Vehicle / base |
EVALUATION PARAMETER
1. Physical Appearance
Method:
A small quantity of the prepared gel body wash is taken in a clean glass beaker and observed visually under normal light. Evaluation includes: Color uniformity Odor (smelling test) Texture (by rubbing between fingers/glass slide) Homogeneity (absence of lumps or particles)
2. pH Determination
Method: Weigh 1 g of gel body wash and dissolve in 10 mL of distilled water. Stir well to form a uniform solution. Calibrate the digital pH meter using standard buffer solutions (pH 4.0 and 7.0). Dip the electrode into the sample solution. Record the pH value. Ideal range: 5.5 – 7.0
3. Viscosity Measurement Method: Fill the sample in a beaker. Use a Brookfield viscometer with suitable spindle. Set rpm (commonly 20–60 rpm). Immerse spindle in gel and allow reading to stabilize. Record viscosity in centipoise (cP).
4. Foamability Test Method (Cylinder Shake Method):Take 10 mL of gel solution in a 100 mL graduated cylinder. Make up volume to 50 mL with water. Shake the cylinder 10–20 times vigorously. Measure foam height immediately. Record foam height at different time intervals (0, 5, 10 min) to check stability.
5. Spreadability Test Method (Glass Slide Method):Place a fixed amount of gel between two glass slides. Apply a known weight (e.g., 500 g) on the upper slide. Remove weight after 1 minute. Measure the diameter of spread gel.
6. Washability Test Method: Apply a small amount of gel on the hand/skin surface. Rub gently for 1–2 minutes. Wash with running tap water. Observe ease of removal and residue formation.
7. Skin Irritation Test (Patch Test)
Method: Clean a small area of skin (usually forearm). Apply a small amount of gel body wash. Leave undisturbed for 24 hours.
Observe for redness, itching, swelling, or irritation.
Result: No irritation = Safe formulation Any reaction = Not suitable
Stability study :-
A stability study of a body wash evaluates how well the product maintains its physical, chemical, microbiological, and functional properties over time under different environmental conditions.The prepared formulations F1,F2,F3 are stored for one month at different temperature and atmosphere
Store formulation in airtight containers.
RESULT
Various parameters done using different natural ingredients various dry form of the natural herbal plant was selected for the study.
1. Preparation of extract
Table No 2:Various Extract of dragon pulp
|
Sr No |
Various solvent used for extract |
colour |
Nature |
|
1 |
Methanol |
Dark greenish |
Jelly like |
|
2 |
Chloroform |
Reddish brawn |
semisolid |
|
3 |
Aqueous |
Dark brown |
sticky |
2. Preformulation study A. Organoleptic Evaluation
Table No 3:Organoleptic Evaluation of extract
|
Ingredients |
Colour |
Odour |
Texture |
Remark |
|
Dragon Fruit |
Pink/ Red |
Mild sweet |
Soft pulp |
Natural antioxidant source |
|
Aloe vera |
Transparent |
Odorless |
Gel-like, mucilaginous |
Skin soothing agent |
3. Identification of Plant Material
A. Macroscopic Identification
Table No 4:Macroscopic Identification
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Name |
Botanical Name |
Part Used |
Morphological Features |
Identification Criteria |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit |
Hylocereus undatus |
Fruit pulp |
Bright pink/red outer skin, white pulp with black seeds |
Identified by characteristic appearance, color, and seed pattern |
|
2 |
Aloe vera |
Aloe barbadensis |
Leaf gel |
Thick fleshy green leaves with clear gel inside |
Identified by succulent leaf structure and mucilaginous gel |
|
3 |
Neem |
Azadirachta indica |
Leaves |
Pinnate leaves, bitter taste, strong odor |
Identified by leaf shape and characteristic bitter smell |
B. Organoleptic Identification
Table No 5:Organoleptic Identification
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Name |
Color |
Odor |
Taste |
Texture |
Identification Result |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit |
Pink/Red |
Mild sweet |
Sweet |
Soft juicy pulp |
Confirmed |
|
2 |
Aloe vera |
Transparent |
Odorless |
Bland |
Gel-like mucilage |
Confirmed |
|
3 |
Neem |
Green |
Bitter pungent |
Bitter |
Dry leaf powder |
Confirmed |
|
4 |
Tulsi |
Green |
Aromatic |
Slightly bitter |
Leafy texture |
Confirmed |
C. Microscopic / Reference-Based Identification
Table No 6: Microscopic Identification
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Name |
Key Microscopic Features |
Reference Standard Used |
Result |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit |
Parenchymatous cells, seed structure |
Botanical reference books |
Confirmed |
|
2 |
Aloe vera |
Mucilage cells, fibrous bundles |
Pharmacognosy text |
Confirmed |
|
3 |
Neem |
Vein islets, trichomes |
Standard herbarium samples |
Confirmed |
|
4 |
Tulsi |
Diacytic stomata, oil glands |
Pharmacognosy atlas |
Confirmed |
4. pH Determination
Table No 7: pH Identification
|
Parameter |
Method |
Ideal Range |
Importance |
|
pH |
Digital pH meter |
5.5 – 7.0 |
Skin compatibility |
5. Solubility Studies
Table No 8: Solubility Studies
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Extract |
Solubility in Water |
Solubility in Ethanol |
Solubility in Hydroalcoholic Solution |
Observation |
Conclusion |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit Extract |
Partially soluble |
Soluble |
Highly soluble |
Forms slight turbidity in water |
Best extracted in hydroalcoholic medium |
|
2 |
Aloe vera Extract |
Fully soluble |
Slightly soluble |
Highly soluble |
Forms clear solution in water |
Suitable for aqueous extraction |
|
3 |
Neem Extract |
Slightly soluble |
Highly soluble |
Highly soluble |
Bitter green solution in ethanol |
Better extraction in ethanol |
The solubility study confirms that hydroalcholic solvent is most suitable for extracting bioactive compounds.
Table No 9: Solubility Studies
|
Solvent |
Observation |
Suitability |
Solvent |
|
Distilled Water |
Partial extraction of phytoconstituents |
Moderate |
Distilled Water |
|
Ethanol |
Better extraction of phenols, flavonoids |
Good |
Ethanol |
5. Phytochemical Screening
The phytochemical screening confirms that all selected herbal extracts contain active bioactive compounds such as phenols, flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids, which contribute to the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cleansing, and moisturizing properties of the polyherbal gel body wash formulation.
Table No 10: Phytochemical screening Studies
|
Phytochemical Group |
Presence |
Major Source Plants |
Skin Benefit |
|
Carbohydrates |
Present |
Dragon fruit, Aloe vera, Tulsi |
Moisturizing |
|
Phenols |
Present |
All extracts |
Antioxidant |
|
Flavonoids |
Present |
All extracts |
Anti-aging |
|
Saponins |
Present |
Aloe vera, Neem |
Cleansing, foaming |
|
Alkaloids |
Present |
Neem, Tulsi, Aloe vera |
Antimicrobial |
6. Compatibility Summary
Table No 11: Compatability Studies
|
Parameter |
Result |
|
Physical Compatibility |
Good |
|
Chemical Compatibility |
No adverse reaction |
|
Phase Stability |
Stable |
|
Color Stability |
Acceptable |
|
Odor Stability |
Unchanged |
7. Moisture Content (Loss on Drying)
Loss on Drying (LOD) method is used to determine the amount of moisture and volatile matter present in dried plant materials. The sample is heated at a controlled temperature until a constant weight is obtained. The Loss on Drying study confirms that moisture content varies among different herbal materials. Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera contain higher moisture levels, while Neem and Tulsi show low moisture content, indicating better stability and suitability for formulation.
Table No 12: Moisture content study
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Material |
Initial Weight (g) |
Final Weight After Drying (g) |
Weight Loss (g) |
Moisture Content (%) |
Observation |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit (dried pulp) |
5.0 |
4.1 |
0.9 |
18% |
Moderate moisture present |
|
2 |
Aloe vera (gel dried) |
5.0 |
3.8 |
1.2 |
24% |
High moisture content |
|
3 |
Neem (leaf powder) |
5.0 |
4.5 |
0.5 |
10% |
Low moisture, stable |
|
4 |
Tulsi (leaf powder) |
5.0 |
4.6 |
0.4 |
8% |
Very low moisture |
Observation Summary
Table No 13: Moisture content summery
|
Parameter |
Result |
|
Highest Moisture |
Aloe vera |
|
Lowest Moisture |
Tulsi |
|
Stability Indication |
Neem and Tulsi are more stable due to low moisture |
|
Risk of Microbial Growth |
Higher in Aloe vera and Dragon fruit |
The Loss on Drying study confirms that moisture content varies among different herbal materials. Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera contain higher moisture levels, while Neem and Tulsi show low moisture content, indicating better stability and suitability for formulation
8. Preliminary Stability Check
A. Stability Observation of Herbal Extracts
Table No 14: Stability study of extract
|
Sr. No. |
Plant Extract |
Storage Condition |
Time Period |
Color Change |
Odor Change |
Precipitation |
Overall Stability |
|
1 |
Dragon Fruit extract |
Room temperature (25°C) |
7–14 days |
Slight fading |
No change |
Absent |
Stable |
|
2 |
Dragon fruit extract |
Refrigeration (4°C) |
7–14 days |
No change |
No change |
Absent |
Highly stable |
|
3 |
Aloe vera extract |
Room temperature |
7–14 days |
Slight yellowing |
No change |
Slight sediment |
Moderately stable |
|
4 |
Aloe vera extract |
Refrigeration |
7–14 days |
No change |
No change |
Absent |
Stable |
|
5 |
Neem extract |
Room temperature |
7–14 days |
Slight darkening |
Slight change |
Absent |
Stable |
|
6 |
Tulsi extract |
Room temperature |
7–14 days |
No change |
No change |
Absent |
Stable |
B. Overall Stability Summary
Table No 15: Stability study Summary
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Best Storage Condition |
Refrigeration (4°C) |
|
Most Stable Extract |
Neem & Tulsi |
|
Least Stable Extract |
Aloe vera (slight sedimentation) |
|
Major Issue Observed |
Minor color change in some extracts |
The preliminary stability study indicates that all herbal extracts, including Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera, remain stable under refrigerated conditions with minimal physical changes. Hence, low-temperature storage is recommended for maintaining extract quality during formulation.
Formulation Development
Table No 16: Formulation table
|
Name of drug |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
|
Betanin |
7.5ml |
8ml |
10ml |
|
Aloe vera |
8ml |
10ml |
12.5ml |
|
Neem extract |
6ml |
4.5ml |
3ml |
|
Coca betaine |
10ml |
30ml |
20ml |
|
Castile soap |
8ml |
4.5ml |
15ml |
|
Glycerin |
6ml |
8ml |
4ml |
|
Xanthan gum |
0.7gm |
0.3gm |
0.5gm |
|
Orange oil |
0.5ml |
2ml |
0.4ml |
|
Citric acid |
0.8gm |
0.4gm |
0.6gm |
|
Sodium benzoate |
0.5gm |
1gm |
2gm |
|
Food color |
2drop |
1drop |
4drop |
|
Purified water |
q.s. |
q.s |
q.s |
Various formulation was prepared by changing the various concentration
Evaluation Of Formulation
Evaluation of various formulation which can be formulated according to the selection of drug candidates.
Table No 17: Evaluation table
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Appearance |
Color |
Odor |
Consistency |
Homogeneity |
|
1 |
F1 |
Smooth gel |
Light pink |
Mild fruity |
Low viscosity (thin gel) |
Uniform |
|
2 |
F2 |
Smooth gel |
Pink/ red |
Pleasant fruity-herbal |
Medium viscosity |
Highly uniform |
|
3 |
F3 |
Thick gel |
Dark pink/ red |
Strong herbal-fruity |
High viscosity (very thick) |
Uniform but sticky |
B. Comparative Summary
Table No 18: Comparative summary
|
Parameter |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
|
Color intensity |
Low |
Moderate (ideal) |
High |
|
Viscosity |
Low |
Medium (ideal) |
High |
|
Spreadability |
High |
Good |
Low |
|
Stability |
Moderate |
High |
Moderate |
|
User acceptability |
Average |
Best |
Poor (sticky feel) |
Among all formulations, F2 showed the most acceptable physical appearance with balanced color, good viscosity, smooth texture, and pleasant odor. Hence, F2 is considered the optimized formulation for the polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit.
Table No 19: pH Comparative summary
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
pH Value |
Method Used |
Skin Compatibility |
Observation |
|
1 |
F1 |
6.2 |
Digital pH meter (1% solution) |
Suitable |
Slightly acidic, acceptable |
|
2 |
F2 |
6.5 |
Digital pH meter (1% solution) |
Highly suitable |
Ideal skin-friendly pH |
|
3 |
F3 |
6.8 |
Digital pH meter (1% solution) |
Suitable |
Slightly towards neutral |
B. pH Interpretation
Table No 20: pH Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Result |
|
Ideal skin pH range |
5.5 – 7.0 |
|
Lowest pH |
F1 (6.2) |
|
Highest pH |
F3 (6.8) |
|
Best balanced formulation |
F2 (6.5) |
All formulations (F1, F2, and F3) of the polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit showed pH values within the safe range for topical application. Among them, F2 exhibited the most suitable and skin-friendly pH (6.5), making it the optimized formulation.
3. Viscosity Measurement
Table No 21: Viscosity study
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Instrument Used |
Spindle No. |
Speed (RPM) |
Viscosity (cP) |
Flow Nature |
Observation |
|
1 |
F1 |
Brookfield Viscometer |
64 |
30 RPM |
3200 cP |
Low thickness |
Thin gel, fast flow |
|
2 |
F2 |
Brookfield Viscometer |
64 |
30 RPM |
4500 cP |
Medium thickness |
Smooth and balanced flow |
|
3 |
F3 |
Brookfield Viscometer |
64 |
30 RPM |
6200 cP |
High thickness |
Very thick, slow flow |
B. Viscosity Interpretation
Table No 22: Viscosity Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Lowest viscosity |
F1 (3200 cP) |
|
Highest viscosity |
F3 (6200 cP) |
|
Ideal range for body wash |
4000 – 5000 cP |
|
Best formulation |
F2 |
The viscosity study of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit shows that F2 formulation has optimal viscosity, ensuring good spreadability, ease of application, and better consumer acceptability compared to F1 and F3.
4. Foamability Test/Result (F1, F2, F3)
Table No 23: Foaming test result
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Method Used |
Initial Foam Height (mL) |
Foam Height After 5 min (mL) |
Foam Stability |
Foam Quality |
Observation |
|
1 |
F1 |
Cylinder Shake Method |
80 mL |
55 mL |
Moderate |
Light foam |
Foam collapses faster |
|
2 |
F2 |
Cylinder Shake Method |
95 mL |
85 mL |
Good |
Rich & creamy foam |
Best foaming property |
|
3 |
F3 |
Cylinder Shake Method |
70 mL |
60 mL |
Low–Moderate |
Dense but less stable |
Foam not uniform |
B. Foamability Interpretation
Table No 24: Foaming Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Highest foam production |
F2 |
|
Best foam stability |
F2 |
|
Lowest foam stability |
F1 |
|
Overly dense foam issue |
F3 |
|
Ideal performance |
F2 |
The foamability test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit showed that F2 formulation produced the most stable, rich, and uniform foam, making it the most suitable formulation for effective cleansing and user acceptability.
5. Spreadability Test/Result (F1, F2, F3)
Table No 25: Spread ability study
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Method Used |
Weight Applied (g) |
Time (sec) |
Diameter of Spread (cm) |
Spreadability (g·cm/sec) |
Observation |
|
1 |
F1 |
Glass Slide Method |
500 g |
60 sec |
6.5 cm |
54.16 |
High spreadability (thin gel) |
|
2 |
F2 |
Glass Slide Method |
500 g |
60 sec |
5.8 cm |
48.33 |
Ideal spreadability |
|
3 |
F3 |
Glass Slide Method |
500 g |
60 sec |
4.5 cm |
37.50 |
Low spreadability (thick gel) |
Table No 26: SpreadabilityInterpretation
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Highest spreadability |
F1 |
|
Lowest spreadability |
F3 |
|
Ideal range |
Moderate spreadability |
|
Best formulation |
F2 |
|
Texture behavior |
Smooth and uniform in F2 |
The spreadability study of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit indicates that F2 formulation has optimal spreadability, ensuring easy application on skin with uniform distribution compared to F1 and F3.
6. Washability Test Result (F1, F2, F3)
The washability test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit shows that F2 formulation has excellent washability with no residue formation, making it the most user-friendly and cosmetically acceptable formulation compared to F1 and F3.
Table No 27: Washability result
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Method Used |
Amount Applied |
Water Used |
Ease of Washing |
Residue After Washing |
Lather Removal |
Observation |
|
1 |
F1 |
Running water rinse test |
Small quantity |
Tap water |
Easy |
Slight residue |
Fast removal |
Acceptable |
|
2 |
F2 |
Running water rinse test |
Small quantity |
Tap water |
Very easy |
No residue |
Complete removal |
Best performance |
|
3 |
F3 |
Running water rinse test |
Small quantity |
Tap water |
Moderate |
Slight sticky residue |
Slower removal |
Less preferred |
B. Washability Interpretation
Table No 28: Washability Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Easiest to wash |
F2 |
|
Least washable |
F3 |
|
Residue formation |
Minimum in F2 |
|
User convenience |
Highest in F2 |
|
Overall performance |
F2 is best |
7. Skin Irritation Test (Patch Test)
The skin irritation (patch) test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit confirmed that all formulations are safe for topical application. Among them, F2 showed excellent skin compatibility with no signs of irritation, making it the most suitable formulation for cosmetic use.
|
F1 = 0 (No irritation) |
|
F2 = 0 (No irritation) |
|
F3 = 1 (Very mild redness) |
Table No 29: Patch test result
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation Code |
Method Used |
Site of Application |
Observation Time |
Redness |
Itching |
Swelling |
Irritation Level |
Final Result |
|
1 |
F1 |
Patch test on forearm skin |
Inner forearm |
24 hours |
Absent |
Absent |
Absent |
None |
Safe |
|
2 |
F2 |
Patch test on forearm skin |
Inner forearm |
24 hours |
Absent |
Absent |
Absent |
None |
Highly safe |
|
3 |
F3 |
Patch test on forearm skin |
Inner forearm |
24 hours |
Very mild |
Absent |
Absent |
Minimal |
Safe (slightly less preferred) |
8. Accelerated Stability Conditions (40°C ±2°C)
Table No 30: Stability study
|
Sr. No. |
Formulation |
Observation |
Result |
|
1 |
F1 |
Minor color change, slight viscosity drop |
Acceptable |
|
2 |
F2 |
No significant change observed |
Most stable |
|
3 |
F3 |
Phase separation started after 15–20 days |
Less stable |
The stability study of polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit confirms that formulation F2 is the most stable under both room temperature and accelerated conditions, showing no significant changes in color, odor, pH, or viscosity. Hence, F2 is considered the optimized and most reliable formulation
Table No 31: Stability Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Best Result |
|
Physical stability |
F2 |
|
Chemical stability |
F2 |
|
pH stability |
F2 |
|
Texture stability |
F2 |
|
Overall performance |
F2 (Optimized formulation) |
CONCLUSION
The study involved: Extraction and preformulation evaluation of herbal materials Phytochemical screening to confirm bioactive compounds. Compatibility and stability studies Evaluation of physical, chemical, and performance parameters. Comparative assessment of multiple formulations (F1, F2, F3). All evaluations confirmed that the herbal ingredients possess strong antioxidant, antimicrobial, moisturizing, and cleansing properties. Among all formulations, F2 showed the best balance of stability, efficacy, and cosmetic acceptability.
Final Thesis Conclusion:
The study concludes that a stable and effective polyherbal gel body wash can be successfully developed using natural herbal extracts. The optimized formulation (F2) is safe for skin application, environmentally friendly, and a promising alternative to synthetic cleansing products. This formulation may be further explored for commercial production and future research development.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to the DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri for providing research facilities.
FUNDING
Nil
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
All the authors have contributed equally
DISCUSSION
No irritation in patch test (safe for topical use) Superior washability with no residue formation Highest stability under both room and accelerated conditions Best overall consumer acceptability and cosmetic elegance
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
Declare none
REFERENCES
Kanchan Jamkar, Raut Sidheshwar, Khune Jayshree, Kadam Priti, Wakte Sneha, Rodge Mohini, Dr Ramesh Ingole, A Novel Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Gel Body Wash, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 2541-2553. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20616519
10.5281/zenodo.20616519