View Article

Abstract

This study focuses on the novel formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal gel-based body wash incorporating Hylocereus undatus (dragon fruit) extract. Dragon fruit is rich in bioactive compounds such as vitamin C, flavonoids, polyphenols, and betalains, which provide antioxidant, moisturizing, and skin-protective properties. The aim of this work is to develop a natural, safe, and effective herbal body wash as an alternative to synthetic surfactant-based cleansers. Objective: The objective of the study is to formulate a stable polyherbal gel body wash using dragon fruit extract and evaluate its physicochemical properties, skin compatibility, cleansing efficiency, and antioxidant potential. Methods: The gel formulation was prepared using suitable natural gelling agents, mild surfactants, preservatives, and polyherbal extracts including dragon fruit. The formulated body wash was evaluated for pH, viscosity, spreadability, foam height and stability, washability, and stability studies. Antioxidant activity was assessed using standard in vitro methods, and skin irritation potential was also evaluated. Results: The formulated gel body wash showed acceptable physicochemical characteristics with a skin-friendly pH, good viscosity, and stable foam formation. The product demonstrated effective cleansing ability along with good spreadability and stability under different storage conditions. Antioxidant activity confirmed the beneficial effect of dragon fruit extract, and no skin irritation was observed, indicating its safety for topical application. Conclusion: The study concludes that the developed polyherbal gel body wash containing dragon fruit extract is a promising natural cosmetic formulation with effective cleansing, antioxidant, and skin-friendly properties. It can serve as a safe alternative to conventional chemical-based body washes, with potential for further optimization and clinical evaluation.

Keywords

Dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus), polyherbal formulation, gel body wash, herbal cosmetics, natural surfactants, skin care, moisturizing agent, phytochemicals, topical formulation, cosmetic evaluation, herbal cleansing product.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Personal hygiene is an essential aspect of daily life, and body washes are widely used cosmetic products for maintaining skin cleanliness and preventing the accumulation of dirt, oil, sweat, and microorganisms on the skin surface. With increasing awareness about skincare and personal grooming, the demand for body wash products has significantly grown in both urban and rural populations. However, most commercially available body washes are formulated using synthetic surfactants, preservatives, and artificial fragrances, which, although effective in cleansing, may lead to undesirable side effects such as skin dryness, irritation, allergic reactions, and disruption of the natural skin barrier when used repeatedly over time.

The human skin acts as a protective barrier against environmental pollutants, microbial infection, and dehydration. Therefore, it is important that cleansing products maintain the natural pH of the skin and do not strip away essential oils. In recent years, there has been a shift in consumer preference toward herbal and natural cosmetic products due to their perceived safety, biodegradability, and therapeutic benefits. Herbal formulations are considered more compatible with human skin as they are derived from natural sources and often contain bioactive compounds that provide additional skincare benefits beyond cleansing.

Plant-based cosmetic formulations are gaining importance in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries because of their antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and moisturizing properties. These properties are mainly attributed to the presence of phytochemicals such as flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, phenols, vitamins, and essential fatty acids. Such compounds not only help in cleansing but also in protecting the skin from oxidative stress and premature aging caused by free radicals and environmental exposure such as UV radiation and pollution.

In this context, dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus), also known as pitaya, has emerged as a valuable natural ingredient for cosmetic applications. It is rich in vitamin C, betalains, flavonoids, and polyphenolic compounds, which contribute to its strong antioxidant and skin-protective activity. Vitamin C plays a key role in collagen synthesis and skin brightening, while betalains and polyphenols help neutralize free radicals and reduce oxidative damage. Additionally, dragon fruit has moisturizing properties that help in maintaining skin hydration and improving overall skin texture. Its gentle nature makes it suitable for use in cosmetic formulations, especially for sensitive skin types.

The concept of polyherbal formulation involves the combination of multiple plant extracts to achieve enhanced therapeutic and cosmetic effects compared to a single herb. In body wash formulations, the use of polyherbal ingredients can improve cleansing efficiency while simultaneously providing nourishment and protection to the skin. Gel-based formulations are particularly preferred due to their smooth consistency, ease of application, good spreadability, aesthetic appeal, and ability to incorporate a wide range of herbal extracts and active compounds. Moreover, gel formulations are generally less irritating compared to harsh liquid surfactant systems.Despite the availability of numerous herbal cosmetic products in the market, there is still a need for scientifically validated formulations that combine effectiveness, stability, safety, and consumer acceptability. Therefore, the present study is focused on the novel formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal gel-based body wash using Hylocereus undatus (dragon fruit) extract. The study aims to develop a stable and effective herbal cleansing product and evaluate its physicochemical properties, skin compatibility, antioxidant activity, and overall performance.

This research contributes to the growing field of herbal cosmetics by exploring the potential of dragon fruit as a key functional ingredient in body wash formulations. The development of such natural products supports the demand for safer, eco-friendly, and skin-friendly alternatives to conventional synthetic personal care products while also promoting the utilization of plant-based resources in cosmetic science.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fresh Dragon Fruit was purchased from Delhi market Aloe vera neem obtained from Botanical garden of DJPS college of pharmacy Pathri. India. Coaca betain, castile soap glycerine, orange oil xanthan gum citric acid sodium benzoate were obtained from S K Enterprises Pune, Maharashtra. All  other  chemicals and reagents used in the study were analytical grade

ANALYTICAL METHOD

The extract of dragon fruit were analysed for various parameter Organoleptic Evaluation Morphological study (shape, size, color) Microscopic examination Determination of pH

Solubility Studies Phytochemical Screening Compatibility Study Moisture Content (Loss on Drying) various parameters are used to study the varius evaluation parameters.

PREPARATION OF METHOD

Method of Preparation- Step 1:collection and preparation of powder : Fresh leaves of neem are collected and dried them under the sunlight for 24 hours. Also collect the dragon fruit and aloevera. Preparation of powder : triturate dried leaves of neem in mortar pestle and aloe vera leaves are also dried for 3 days for trituration

Step 2: maceration: Dragon fruit was taken and cut it and separate its pulp material then boil the pulp for 20-30 minutes and cool it. filter it by using sintered glass filter. Then filtered extract is collect. powder of neem and aloe vera is mix and macerated with rose water for 5-7 days, all extract is filtered and stored it for further formulation

Step 3: preparation of bodywash: Take 53.2Ml of purified water and add 0.7Gm of xanthum gum was stirred, Add 6Ml glycerin, surfactants castile soap and coca betaine and extract were added sequentially. For better appearance and fragrance 0.5Ml Orange oil,2Ml of food color was added.4ml of Citric acid was added to adjust PH of formulation and 0.5gm of sodium benzoate was added for preserved the formulation. This formulation was kept at room temperature to stabilize.

Table No 1:Formulation and Devlopement

Sr. No.

Ingredient

Quantity

Function

1

Dragon fruit extract

7.5 mL

Antioxidant, skin brightening

2

Aloe vera gel/extract

8 mL

Soothing, moisturizing

3

Neem extract

6 mL

Antibacterial, antifungal

4

Coca betaine

10 mL

Mild surfactant, foam booster

5

Castile soap

8 mL

Primary cleansing base

6

Glycerin

6 mL

Humectant (moisturizer)

7

Xanthan gum

0.7 g

Gel thickener

8

Orange oil

0.5 mL

Fragrance + mild antimicrobial

9

Citric acid solution

4mL

pH adjustment (5.5–6.5)

10

Sodium benzoate

0.5 g

Preservative

11

Food colour

2mL

Aesthetic appearance

12

Purified water

Up to 100 mL

Vehicle / base

EVALUATION PARAMETER

1. Physical Appearance

Method:
A small quantity of the prepared gel body wash is taken in a clean glass beaker and observed visually under normal light. Evaluation includes: Color uniformity Odor (smelling test) Texture (by rubbing between fingers/glass slide) Homogeneity (absence of lumps or particles)

2. pH Determination

Method: Weigh 1 g of gel body wash and dissolve in 10 mL of distilled water. Stir well to form a uniform solution. Calibrate the digital pH meter using standard buffer solutions (pH 4.0 and 7.0). Dip the electrode into the sample solution. Record the pH value. Ideal range: 5.5 – 7.0

3. Viscosity Measurement Method: Fill the sample in a beaker. Use a Brookfield viscometer with suitable spindle. Set rpm (commonly 20–60 rpm). Immerse spindle in gel and allow reading to stabilize. Record viscosity in centipoise (cP).

4. Foamability Test Method (Cylinder Shake Method):Take 10 mL of gel solution in a 100 mL graduated cylinder. Make up volume to 50 mL with water. Shake the cylinder 10–20 times vigorously. Measure foam height immediately. Record foam height at different time intervals (0, 5, 10 min) to check stability.

5. Spreadability Test Method (Glass Slide Method):Place a fixed amount of gel between two glass slides. Apply a known weight (e.g., 500 g) on the upper slide. Remove weight after 1 minute. Measure the diameter of spread gel.

6. Washability Test Method: Apply a small amount of gel on the hand/skin surface. Rub gently for 1–2 minutes. Wash with running tap water. Observe ease of removal and residue formation.

7. Skin Irritation Test (Patch Test)

Method: Clean a small area of skin (usually forearm). Apply a small amount of gel body wash. Leave undisturbed for 24 hours.

Observe for redness, itching, swelling, or irritation.

Result: No irritation = Safe formulation Any reaction = Not suitable

Stability study :-

A stability study of a body wash evaluates how well the product maintains its physical, chemical, microbiological, and functional properties over time under different environmental conditions.The prepared formulations F1,F2,F3 are stored for one month at different temperature and atmosphere

Store formulation in airtight containers.

  • Keep samples under different conditions:
  • Room temperature (25°C ± 2°C)
  • Refrigeration (4°C)
  • Elevated temperature (40°C ± 2°C)
  • Observe at intervals (7, 14, 30 days).

RESULT

Various parameters done using different natural ingredients various dry form of the natural herbal plant was selected for the study.

1. Preparation of extract

Table No 2:Various Extract of dragon pulp

Sr No

Various solvent used for extract

colour

Nature

1

Methanol

Dark greenish

Jelly like

2

Chloroform

Reddish brawn

semisolid

3

Aqueous

Dark brown

sticky

2. Preformulation study A. Organoleptic Evaluation

Table No 3:Organoleptic Evaluation of extract

Ingredients

Colour

Odour

Texture

Remark

Dragon Fruit

Pink/ Red

Mild sweet

Soft pulp

Natural antioxidant source

Aloe vera

Transparent

Odorless

Gel-like, mucilaginous

Skin soothing agent

3. Identification of Plant Material

A. Macroscopic Identification

Table No 4:Macroscopic Identification

Sr. No.

Plant Name

Botanical Name

Part Used

Morphological Features

Identification Criteria

1

Dragon Fruit

Hylocereus undatus

Fruit pulp

Bright pink/red outer skin, white pulp with black seeds

Identified by characteristic appearance, color, and seed pattern

2

Aloe vera

Aloe barbadensis

Leaf gel

Thick fleshy green leaves with clear gel inside

Identified by succulent leaf structure and mucilaginous gel

3

Neem

Azadirachta indica

Leaves

Pinnate leaves, bitter taste, strong odor

Identified by leaf shape and characteristic bitter smell

B. Organoleptic Identification

Table No 5:Organoleptic  Identification

Sr. No.

Plant Name

Color

Odor

Taste

Texture

Identification Result

1

Dragon Fruit

Pink/Red

Mild sweet

Sweet

Soft juicy pulp

Confirmed

2

Aloe vera

Transparent

Odorless

Bland

Gel-like mucilage

Confirmed

3

Neem

Green

Bitter pungent

Bitter

Dry leaf powder

Confirmed

4

Tulsi

Green

Aromatic

Slightly bitter

Leafy texture

Confirmed

C. Microscopic / Reference-Based Identification

Table No 6: Microscopic  Identification

Sr. No.

Plant Name

Key Microscopic Features

Reference Standard Used

Result

1

Dragon Fruit

Parenchymatous cells, seed structure

Botanical reference books

Confirmed

2

Aloe vera

Mucilage cells, fibrous bundles

Pharmacognosy text

Confirmed

3

Neem

Vein islets, trichomes

Standard herbarium samples

Confirmed

4

Tulsi

Diacytic stomata, oil glands

Pharmacognosy atlas

Confirmed

4. pH Determination

Table No 7: pH Identification

Parameter

Method

Ideal Range

Importance

pH

Digital pH meter

5.5 – 7.0

Skin compatibility

5. Solubility Studies

Table No 8: Solubility Studies

Sr. No.

Plant Extract

Solubility in Water

Solubility in Ethanol

Solubility in Hydroalcoholic Solution

Observation

Conclusion

1

Dragon Fruit Extract

Partially soluble

Soluble

Highly soluble

Forms slight turbidity in water

Best extracted in hydroalcoholic medium

2

Aloe vera Extract

Fully soluble

Slightly soluble

Highly soluble

Forms clear solution in water

Suitable for aqueous extraction

3

Neem Extract

Slightly soluble

Highly soluble

Highly soluble

Bitter green solution in ethanol

Better extraction in ethanol

The solubility study confirms that hydroalcholic solvent is most suitable for extracting bioactive compounds.

Table No 9: Solubility Studies

Solvent

Observation

Suitability

Solvent

Distilled Water

Partial extraction of phytoconstituents

Moderate

Distilled Water

Ethanol

Better extraction of phenols, flavonoids

Good

Ethanol

5. Phytochemical Screening

The phytochemical screening confirms that all selected herbal extracts contain active bioactive compounds such as phenols, flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids, which contribute to the antioxidant, antimicrobial, cleansing, and moisturizing properties of the polyherbal gel body wash formulation.

Table No 10: Phytochemical screening  Studies

Phytochemical Group

Presence

Major Source Plants

Skin Benefit

Carbohydrates

Present

Dragon fruit, Aloe vera, Tulsi

Moisturizing

Phenols

Present

All extracts

Antioxidant

Flavonoids

Present

All extracts

Anti-aging

Saponins

Present

Aloe vera, Neem

Cleansing, foaming

Alkaloids

Present

Neem, Tulsi, Aloe vera

Antimicrobial

6. Compatibility Summary

Table No 11: Compatability Studies

Parameter

Result

Physical Compatibility

Good

Chemical Compatibility

No adverse reaction

Phase Stability

Stable

Color Stability

Acceptable

Odor Stability

Unchanged

7. Moisture Content (Loss on Drying)

Loss on Drying (LOD) method is used to determine the amount of moisture and volatile        matter present in dried plant materials. The sample is heated at a controlled temperature until a constant weight is obtained. The Loss on Drying study confirms that moisture content varies among different herbal materials. Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera contain higher moisture levels, while Neem and Tulsi show low moisture content, indicating better stability and suitability for formulation.

Table No 12: Moisture content study

Sr. No.

Plant Material

Initial Weight (g)

Final Weight After Drying (g)

Weight Loss (g)

Moisture Content (%)

Observation

1

Dragon Fruit (dried pulp)

5.0

4.1

0.9

18%

Moderate moisture present

2

Aloe vera (gel dried)

5.0

3.8

1.2

24%

High moisture content

3

Neem (leaf powder)

5.0

4.5

0.5

10%

Low moisture, stable

4

Tulsi (leaf powder)

5.0

4.6

0.4

8%

Very low moisture

Observation Summary

Table No 13: Moisture content summery

Parameter

Result

Highest Moisture

Aloe vera

Lowest Moisture

Tulsi

Stability Indication

Neem and Tulsi are more stable due to low moisture

Risk of Microbial Growth

Higher in Aloe vera and Dragon fruit

The Loss on Drying study confirms that moisture content varies among different herbal materials. Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera contain higher moisture levels, while Neem and Tulsi show low moisture content, indicating better stability and suitability for formulation     

8.  Preliminary Stability Check

A. Stability Observation of Herbal Extracts

Table No 14: Stability study of extract

Sr. No.

Plant Extract

Storage Condition

Time Period

Color Change

Odor Change

Precipitation

Overall Stability

1

Dragon Fruit extract

Room temperature (25°C)

7–14 days

Slight fading

No change

Absent

Stable

2

Dragon fruit extract

Refrigeration (4°C)

7–14 days

No change

No change

Absent

Highly stable

3

Aloe vera extract

Room temperature

7–14 days

Slight yellowing

No change

Slight sediment

Moderately stable

4

Aloe vera extract

Refrigeration

7–14 days

No change

No change

Absent

Stable

5

Neem extract

Room temperature

7–14 days

Slight darkening

Slight change

Absent

Stable

6

Tulsi extract

Room temperature

7–14 days

No change

No change

Absent

Stable

B. Overall Stability Summary

Table No 15: Stability study Summary

Parameter

Observation

Best Storage Condition

Refrigeration (4°C)

Most Stable Extract

Neem & Tulsi

Least Stable Extract

Aloe vera (slight sedimentation)

Major Issue Observed

Minor color change in some extracts

The preliminary stability study indicates that all herbal extracts, including Dragon Fruit and Aloe vera, remain stable under refrigerated conditions with minimal physical changes. Hence, low-temperature storage is recommended for maintaining extract quality during formulation.

Formulation Development

Table No 16: Formulation table

Name of drug

F1

F2

F3

Betanin

7.5ml

8ml

10ml

Aloe vera

8ml

10ml

12.5ml

Neem extract

6ml

4.5ml

3ml

Coca betaine

10ml

30ml

20ml

Castile soap

8ml

4.5ml

15ml

Glycerin

6ml

8ml

4ml

Xanthan gum

0.7gm

0.3gm

0.5gm

Orange oil

0.5ml

2ml

0.4ml

Citric acid

0.8gm

0.4gm

0.6gm

Sodium benzoate

0.5gm

1gm

2gm

Food color

2drop

1drop

4drop

Purified water

q.s.

q.s

q.s

Various formulation was prepared by changing the various concentration 

Evaluation Of Formulation

Evaluation of various formulation which can be formulated according to the selection of drug candidates.

  1. Physical Appearance of Formulations (F1, F2, F3) – Dragon Fruit Gel Body Wash

Table No 17: Evaluation table

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Appearance

Color

Odor

Consistency

Homogeneity

1

F1

Smooth gel

Light pink

Mild fruity

Low viscosity (thin gel)

Uniform

2

F2

Smooth gel

Pink/ red

Pleasant fruity-herbal

Medium viscosity

Highly uniform

3

F3

Thick gel

Dark pink/ red

Strong herbal-fruity

High viscosity (very thick)

Uniform but sticky

B. Comparative Summary

Table No 18: Comparative summary

Parameter

F1

F2

F3

Color intensity

Low

Moderate (ideal)

High

Viscosity

Low

Medium (ideal)

High

Spreadability

High

Good

Low

Stability

Moderate

High

Moderate

User acceptability

Average

Best

Poor (sticky feel)

Among all formulations, F2 showed the most acceptable physical appearance with balanced color, good viscosity, smooth texture, and pleasant odor. Hence, F2 is considered the optimized formulation for the polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit.

  1. pH Determination-pH Results of Formulations (F1, F2, F3)

Table No 19: pH Comparative summary

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

pH Value

Method Used

Skin Compatibility

Observation

1

F1

6.2

Digital pH meter (1% solution)

Suitable

Slightly acidic, acceptable

2

F2

6.5

Digital pH meter (1% solution)

Highly suitable

Ideal skin-friendly pH

3

F3

6.8

Digital pH meter (1% solution)

Suitable

Slightly towards neutral

B. pH Interpretation

Table No 20: pH Interpretation

Parameter

Result

Ideal skin pH range

5.5 – 7.0

Lowest pH

F1 (6.2)

Highest pH

F3 (6.8)

Best balanced formulation

F2 (6.5)

All formulations (F1, F2, and F3) of the polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit showed pH values within the safe range for topical application. Among them, F2 exhibited the most suitable and skin-friendly pH (6.5), making it the optimized formulation.

3. Viscosity Measurement

Table No 21: Viscosity study

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Instrument Used

Spindle No.

Speed (RPM)

Viscosity (cP)

Flow Nature

Observation

1

F1

Brookfield Viscometer

64

30 RPM

3200 cP

Low thickness

Thin gel, fast flow

2

F2

Brookfield Viscometer

64

30 RPM

4500 cP

Medium thickness

Smooth and balanced flow

3

F3

Brookfield Viscometer

64

30 RPM

6200 cP

High thickness

Very thick, slow flow

B. Viscosity Interpretation

Table No 22: Viscosity Interpretation

Parameter

Observation

Lowest viscosity

F1 (3200 cP)

Highest viscosity

F3 (6200 cP)

Ideal range for body wash

4000 – 5000 cP

Best formulation

F2

The viscosity study of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit shows that F2 formulation has optimal viscosity, ensuring good spreadability, ease of application, and better consumer acceptability compared to F1 and F3.

4. Foamability Test/Result (F1, F2, F3)

Table No 23: Foaming test result

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Method Used

Initial Foam Height (mL)

Foam Height After 5 min (mL)

Foam Stability

Foam Quality

Observation

1

F1

Cylinder Shake Method

80 mL

55 mL

Moderate

Light foam

Foam collapses faster

2

F2

Cylinder Shake Method

95 mL

85 mL

Good

Rich & creamy foam

Best foaming property

3

F3

Cylinder Shake Method

70 mL

60 mL

Low–Moderate

Dense but less stable

Foam not uniform

B. Foamability Interpretation

Table No 24: Foaming Interpretation

Parameter

Observation

Highest foam production

F2

Best foam stability

F2

Lowest foam stability

F1

Overly dense foam issue

F3

Ideal performance

F2

The foamability test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit showed that F2 formulation produced the most stable, rich, and uniform foam, making it the most suitable formulation for effective cleansing and user acceptability.

5. Spreadability Test/Result (F1, F2, F3)

Table No 25: Spread ability study

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Method Used

Weight Applied (g)

Time (sec)

Diameter of Spread (cm)

Spreadability (g·cm/sec)

Observation

1

F1

Glass Slide Method

500 g

60 sec

6.5 cm

54.16

High spreadability (thin gel)

2

F2

Glass Slide Method

500 g

60 sec

5.8 cm

48.33

Ideal spreadability

3

F3

Glass Slide Method

500 g

60 sec

4.5 cm

37.50

Low spreadability (thick gel)

Table No 26: SpreadabilityInterpretation

Parameter

Observation

Highest spreadability

F1

Lowest spreadability

F3

Ideal range

Moderate spreadability

Best formulation

F2

Texture behavior

Smooth and uniform in F2

The spreadability study of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit indicates that F2 formulation has optimal spreadability, ensuring easy application on skin with uniform distribution compared to F1 and F3.

6. Washability Test Result (F1, F2, F3)

The washability test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit shows that F2 formulation has excellent washability with no residue formation, making it the most user-friendly and cosmetically acceptable formulation compared to F1 and F3.

Table No 27: Washability result

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Method Used

Amount Applied

Water Used

Ease of Washing

Residue After Washing

Lather Removal

Observation

1

F1

Running water rinse test

Small quantity

Tap water

Easy

Slight residue

Fast removal

Acceptable

2

F2

Running water rinse test

Small quantity

Tap water

Very easy

No residue

Complete removal

Best performance

3

F3

Running water rinse test

Small quantity

Tap water

Moderate

Slight sticky residue

Slower removal

Less preferred

B. Washability Interpretation

Table No 28: Washability Interpretation

Parameter

Observation

Easiest to wash

F2

Least washable

F3

Residue formation

Minimum in F2

User convenience

Highest in F2

Overall performance

F2 is best

7. Skin Irritation Test (Patch Test)

The skin irritation (patch) test of polyherbal gel body wash formulations containing Dragon Fruit confirmed that all formulations are safe for topical application. Among them, F2 showed excellent skin compatibility with no signs of irritation, making it the most suitable formulation for cosmetic use.

F1 = 0 (No irritation)

F2 = 0 (No irritation)

F3 = 1 (Very mild redness)

Table No 29: Patch test result

Sr. No.

Formulation Code

Method Used

Site of Application

Observation Time

Redness

Itching

Swelling

Irritation Level

Final Result

1

F1

Patch test on forearm skin

Inner forearm

24 hours

Absent

Absent

Absent

None

Safe

2

F2

Patch test on forearm skin

Inner forearm

24 hours

Absent

Absent

Absent

None

Highly safe

3

F3

Patch test on forearm skin

Inner forearm

24 hours

Very mild

Absent

Absent

Minimal

Safe (slightly less preferred)

8. Accelerated Stability Conditions (40°C ±2°C)

Table No 30: Stability study

Sr. No.

Formulation

Observation

Result

1

F1

Minor color change, slight viscosity drop

Acceptable

2

F2

No significant change observed

Most stable

3

F3

Phase separation started after 15–20 days

Less stable

The stability study of polyherbal gel body wash containing Dragon Fruit confirms that formulation F2 is the most stable under both room temperature and accelerated conditions, showing no significant changes in color, odor, pH, or viscosity. Hence, F2 is considered the optimized and most reliable formulation

Table No 31: Stability Interpretation

Parameter

Best Result

Physical stability

F2

Chemical stability

F2

pH stability

F2

Texture stability

F2

Overall performance

F2 (Optimized formulation)

CONCLUSION

The study involved: Extraction and preformulation evaluation of herbal materials Phytochemical screening to confirm bioactive compounds. Compatibility and stability studies Evaluation of physical, chemical, and performance parameters. Comparative assessment of multiple formulations (F1, F2, F3). All evaluations confirmed that the herbal ingredients possess strong antioxidant, antimicrobial, moisturizing, and cleansing properties. Among all formulations, F2 showed the best balance of stability, efficacy, and cosmetic acceptability.

Final Thesis Conclusion:

The study concludes that a stable and effective polyherbal gel body wash can be successfully developed using natural herbal extracts. The optimized formulation (F2) is safe for skin application, environmentally friendly, and a promising alternative to synthetic cleansing products. This formulation may be further explored for commercial production and future research development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The  authors  are  grateful  to  the  DJPS  College  of  Pharmacy,  Pathri  for providing research facilities.

FUNDING

Nil

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All the authors have contributed equally

DISCUSSION

No irritation in patch test (safe for topical use) Superior washability with no residue formation  Highest stability under both room and accelerated conditions Best overall consumer acceptability and cosmetic elegance

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

Declare none

REFERENCES

  1. Richardson M. Understanding the structure and function of the skin. Nurs Times. 2003; Aug 5-11; 99(31): 46-8. PMID: 13677123.
  2. Sandeep DS, Narayana Charyulu R, Prashant Nayak, Aliss Maharjan, Indira Ghalan. Formulations of Antimicrobial Polyherbal Hand wash. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7): 864-866.
  3. Vats S., Agarwal K., Kumar A. Preparation and Standardization of Vrihatsamsharkar Churna: A Polyherbal Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(5): 2244-9.
  4. S. Mary Princess Sulekha, V. Poorna Pushkala. Screening of Antimicrobial activity of Siddhar Agathiyar’s Polyherbal preparation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(5): 2441-4.
  5.  Ranjith Anishetty, Satya Swapna, B. Aishwarya, K. Chaitanya Sravanthi. Evaluation of antibacterial activity potential of extracts of Ricinus communis, Zingiber officinalis and Punica granatum in a Polyherbal Extract. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(11): Nov. 1385-1388. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X
  6. Rohilla P, Gupta JP. a Review on Herbal Medicine in India: Current Market Trends and Opportunities. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2023; 14(4): 141–5. DOI:10.7897/2277-4343.1404131
  7.  Handrayani L, Aryani R, Indra. Liquid Bath Soap Formulation and Antibacterial Activity Test Against Staphylococcus aureus of Kecombrang (Etlingera elatior (Jack) R . M . Sm .) Flos Extracts. Curr Breakthr Pharm Mater Anal. 2014;17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33084/bjop.v4i1.1589
  8.  Arti Gautam, Swarnakshi Upadhyay. Formulation and Standardization of Polyherbal Face Wash Gel for Acne Management. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(9): 3931-5.
  9. FormulationAnd Evaluation Of Physical Properties Of Liquid Soap.pdf. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1071/1/012009
  10. Ayyappadasan G, Rubavathi S, Kanimozli S. Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal-Spirulina Based Conditioning and Antioxidant Shampoo. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(5):2317-1.
  11.  Anuradha G. More, Sneha R. Shinde, Padmaja S. Kore, Mayuresh N. Jadhav, Amit S. Tapkir. Investigating the effect of Polyherbal Ointment on Non-Healing Burn Wound: The Geriatric Approach. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(10): 4610-6.
  12. Anjith Anishetty, Satya Swapna, B. Aishwarya, K. Chaitanya Sravanthi. Evaluation of antibacterial activity potential of extracts of Ricinus communis, Zingiber officinalis and Punica granatum in a Polyherbal Extract. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(11): Nov. 1385-1388. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X   

Reference

  1. Richardson M. Understanding the structure and function of the skin. Nurs Times. 2003; Aug 5-11; 99(31): 46-8. PMID: 13677123.
  2. Sandeep DS, Narayana Charyulu R, Prashant Nayak, Aliss Maharjan, Indira Ghalan. Formulations of Antimicrobial Polyherbal Hand wash. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7): 864-866.
  3. Vats S., Agarwal K., Kumar A. Preparation and Standardization of Vrihatsamsharkar Churna: A Polyherbal Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(5): 2244-9.
  4. S. Mary Princess Sulekha, V. Poorna Pushkala. Screening of Antimicrobial activity of Siddhar Agathiyar’s Polyherbal preparation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(5): 2441-4.
  5.  Ranjith Anishetty, Satya Swapna, B. Aishwarya, K. Chaitanya Sravanthi. Evaluation of antibacterial activity potential of extracts of Ricinus communis, Zingiber officinalis and Punica granatum in a Polyherbal Extract. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(11): Nov. 1385-1388. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X
  6. Rohilla P, Gupta JP. a Review on Herbal Medicine in India: Current Market Trends and Opportunities. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2023; 14(4): 141–5. DOI:10.7897/2277-4343.1404131
  7.  Handrayani L, Aryani R, Indra. Liquid Bath Soap Formulation and Antibacterial Activity Test Against Staphylococcus aureus of Kecombrang (Etlingera elatior (Jack) R . M . Sm .) Flos Extracts. Curr Breakthr Pharm Mater Anal. 2014;17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33084/bjop.v4i1.1589
  8.  Arti Gautam, Swarnakshi Upadhyay. Formulation and Standardization of Polyherbal Face Wash Gel for Acne Management. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(9): 3931-5.
  9. FormulationAnd Evaluation Of Physical Properties Of Liquid Soap.pdf. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1071/1/012009
  10. Ayyappadasan G, Rubavathi S, Kanimozli S. Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal-Spirulina Based Conditioning and Antioxidant Shampoo. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(5):2317-1.
  11.  Anuradha G. More, Sneha R. Shinde, Padmaja S. Kore, Mayuresh N. Jadhav, Amit S. Tapkir. Investigating the effect of Polyherbal Ointment on Non-Healing Burn Wound: The Geriatric Approach. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(10): 4610-6.
  12. Anjith Anishetty, Satya Swapna, B. Aishwarya, K. Chaitanya Sravanthi. Evaluation of antibacterial activity potential of extracts of Ricinus communis, Zingiber officinalis and Punica granatum in a Polyherbal Extract. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(11): Nov. 1385-1388. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X   

Photo
Kanchan Jamkar
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Raut Sidheshwar
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Khune Jayshree
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Kadam Priti
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Wakte Sneha
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Wakte Sneha
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Rodge Mohini
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Photo
Dr Ramesh Ingole
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, DJPS College of Pharmacy, Pathri, Parbhani

Kanchan Jamkar, Raut Sidheshwar, Khune Jayshree, Kadam Priti, Wakte Sneha, Rodge Mohini, Dr Ramesh Ingole, A Novel Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Gel Body Wash, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 2541-2553. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20616519

More related articles
Nanotechnology-Enabled Strategies for Sustained Re...
Darshan Jadhav, Rishikesh Bachhav, Khanderao Jadhav, Sheetal Gond...
Agro-Waste Valorization of Pomegranate Peel: Isola...
Rasika Tilekar, Pramod Ingale, Swadeep Karpe, Atharva Naikare, Bh...
Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) in HPLC Method...
Rehan Riyaz Sayyad, Avinash Sapkale, Dr Amit Kasabe...
A Critical Review on Characterization Methods of SMEDDS: Droplet Dynamics, Therm...
Yash Patel, Nitin Haswani, K. Agrawal, Amod Patil, Pritam Jain, Mahesh Bhagwat, Pranjali Lingalwar...
Formulation And Evaluation of Paracetamol Dry Powder Sachets for Reconstitution ...
R. Daud, Priti Jadhav, Datta Wahatule, Krushna Tarte, Shreyas Gore ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Face Serum for Hyperpigmentation ...
P. C. Rajoba, P.B. Jadhav , P.G. Shinde, P.V. Naik, P.R. Mane, P.D. Mane...
More related articles
Nanotechnology-Enabled Strategies for Sustained Release of Poorly Soluble Drugs...
Darshan Jadhav, Rishikesh Bachhav, Khanderao Jadhav, Sheetal Gondkar...
Agro-Waste Valorization of Pomegranate Peel: Isolation of Ellagic Acid and Devel...
Rasika Tilekar, Pramod Ingale, Swadeep Karpe, Atharva Naikare, Bhagyashri Gandhile...
Nanotechnology-Enabled Strategies for Sustained Release of Poorly Soluble Drugs...
Darshan Jadhav, Rishikesh Bachhav, Khanderao Jadhav, Sheetal Gondkar...
Agro-Waste Valorization of Pomegranate Peel: Isolation of Ellagic Acid and Devel...
Rasika Tilekar, Pramod Ingale, Swadeep Karpe, Atharva Naikare, Bhagyashri Gandhile...