Cold Cream Conundrum: A Comparative Evaluation Of Marketed Products For Optimal Skincare

Cold creams have long been favored for their effectiveness in maintaining skin health and promoting an elegant appearance. The safety and efficacy of these creams depend on their formulation properties and manufacturing methods, which can vary among different marketed products¹. This research aims to evaluate the quality of five different cold cream brands through a comprehensive comparative study.

Cosmetics have been used for centuries to enhance and purify the skin, with the term "cosmetics" derived from the Greek word "cosmetics" meaning to adom. Among cosmetic products, cold cream stands out as a water-in-oil emulsion, providing prolonged contact time at the application site, offering non-greasy emollience to the skin. Cold creams play a vital role in restoring moisture to dry skin, clearing pores of waste materials, and cooling the body. Their water phase contributes to extra skin conservation, and they easily liquefy at body temperature. penetrating the epidermis through natural pores².

The name "cold cream" itself signifies the cooling sensation experienced upon application, as the water content evaporates. The dominance of the oil phase in cold creams makes them suitable for use in colder temperatures or during the winter season, while vanishing creams, rich in the aqueous phase, are preferred for hot environments³.

Creams, as topical preparations, offer effective skin absorption and can be applied to various body parts, such as the face, hands, legs, and skin. They are classified as semisolid dosage forms containing medicinal substances dissolved or dispersed in suitable bases to form a homogenous mass. Creams serve as pharmaceutical and cosmetic products, with medicated creams catering to specific skin-related disorders and non-medicated creams widely used for various dermatoses⁴.

 Two types of creams: oil-in-water (O/W) creams, composed of small oil droplets dispersed in a continuous aqueous phase, and water-in-oil (W/O) creams, comprising small water droplets dispersed in a continuous oily phase⁵.

Cold creams offer a multitude of uses, including topical pharmaceutical applications for skin treatment, maintenance of moisture balance, makeup removal, emollient effects, and protective oily layers. Additionally, they act as carriers for drug substances and aid in removing oil-soluble impurities from the skin⁵. 

While cold creams present numerous advantages, such as ease of application, broad accessibility, and high patient compliance, they do have some disadvantages. Larger particle-sized drugs may not be easily absorbed through the skin pores, leading to potential skin irritation and allergic reactions. Moreover, some drugs may poorly permeate the skin, affecting their absorption and effectiveness⁶.

OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:

Aim of our study is to do comparative study of 5 different marketed cold creams for this we evaluate different cold cream for different parameter like Acid valve, pH test ,saponification value , microbial growth, irritancy test, spread ability test etc.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Cream such as Ponds, Nivea, Wottagirl, Vaseline and Boroline were purchased from local market. All the other chemicals used in formulation are of analytical grades from college laboratories.

MATERIAL’S

Marketed Cream

Marketed Cream

• Ingredients:-Water, Mineral Oil, Glycerin ,Glyceryl Stearate ,Cyclomethicone , Ceteth-2 ,Stearyl Stearate , Steareth-21 , Microcrystalline Wax , Paraffin , Cetearyl Alcohol , Lanolin ,Phenoxyethanol, Carbomer , Triethanolamine , Methylparaben , Sodium PCA , Propylparaben , Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus) Seed Oil G, Disodium EDTA , BHT , Cholesterol , Lecithin , Stearic Acid , Palmitic Acid , Parfum.
• Manufacture By :- L.B.C.P., unit ii, Haridwar 249 403, Uttarakhand. M 16/c/ua/20010.

Fig No 1:- Ponds Cream

Fig No 2:- Nivea Cream

Fig No 3:- Wottagirl Cream

Fig No4:- Vaseline

Fig No 5:-Boroline

Chemicals used for evaluation parameter:

Agar Media, Potassium Hydroxide, Phenolphthalein, Hydrochloride Acid, Ethanol, ether, NaOH , Amaranth Dye all the chemicals were issued  from microbiology, chemistry, harmacognosy and Pharmacutics laboratory  of Sonekar college  of pharmacy, koradi.

Evaluation Parameters:

1. Organoleptic Properties:

The assessment of these physical properties aids in determining the cream's uniqueness, potential market appeal and suitability for specific purposes. Furthermore, understanding the cream's color, odor, and appearance helps in establishing a baseline for future formulation optimization and quality control measures. By considering these key attributes, researchers and manufacturers can make informed decisions to meet consumer preferences and ensure the cream's overall effectiveness and marketability. The cream's color, odor, and appearance were meticulously observed and recorded following established protocols⁷ .

2.  Washability:

Washability; The cream's washability was tested by applying it to the hand and observing its behavior under running water⁷.

3. pH Measurement:

pH Measurement: The pH of the cream was determined by dissolving a sample in distilled water, and the pH meter was calibrated using standard buffer solutions⁷.

4. Irritancy Test:

To assess the irritancy potential, a specified area on the left-hand dorsal surface was marked, and the cream was applied. The area was monitored for any signs of irritation. erythema, or edema at regular intervals for up to 24 hours^7,8.

5. Microbial Growth:

Agar media was prepared, and the formulated cream was inoculated using the steak plate method. A control plate was also prepared without the cream. Both plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, and the microbial growth was compared ^7,8

6. Saponification Value:

The saponification value of the cream was determined by refluxing a sample with 0.5 N alcoholic KOH and titrating it with 0.5 N HCI ^7,8.

7. Acid Value:

The acid value of the cream was determined by dissolving a sample in alcohol and solvent ether mixture, refluxing it, and titrating with 0.1 N NaOH^7,8.

8. Dye Test

The emulsion type was determined by mixing the cream with water-soluble dye (amaranth) and observing under a microscope. Additionally, oil-soluble dye (Scarlet red C or Sudan III) was used to assess the emulsion type ^7,8.

9. Homogeneity Test:

Homogeneity of the cream was assessed through visual appearance and test^7,8.

RESULTS:

Organoleptic Properties:

The physical properties of formulated cream were observed by colour, odour and appearance.

Fig No 7: Result of microbial  test

 

Fig No 8: Result of Dye test

Brand A Brand B, and Brand C exhibited an O/W type emulsion, as the continuous phase appeared red under the microscope. This emulsion type is generally preferred for cosmetic and skincare products, as it allows for better hydration and easy absorption by the skin due to the water being the external phase.

On the other hand, Brand D and Brand E demonstrated a W/O type emulsion, where the scattered globules appeared red, and the continuous phase remained colorless. While W/O emulsions have their specific applications, they are typically used in formulations that aim to provide a protective barrier on the skin or lock in moisture for longer-lasting hydration.

Homogeneity

The homogeneity of the formulated cream was judged by the visual appearance and touch. The appearance and touch of the cream were good.

DISCUSSION:

The present study comparatively evaluated five commercially available cold cream formulations using standard physicochemical, microbiological, and dermatological quality parameters. The selected evaluation criteria, including pH, acid value, saponification value, spreadability, washability, skin irritancy, and microbial limit test, are widely recognized indicators of the quality, safety, and performance of topical semisolid formulations.

The pH of all tested formulations was within the acceptable range for topical preparations, suggesting good compatibility with the physiological pH of the skin. Maintenance of an appropriate pH is essential to preserve the integrity of the skin barrier, minimize irritation, and ensure product stability during storage and use. The observed pH values indicate that all formulations are suitable for routine topical application.

Acid value and saponification value are important quality control parameters that reflect the composition and stability of lipid-based formulations. The acid values of all evaluated products were within acceptable limits, indicating minimal degradation of fatty constituents and satisfactory formulation quality. Similarly, the saponification values demonstrated appropriate fatty acid composition, confirming the consistency of the manufacturing process among the marketed products.

The spreadability and washability characteristics varied slightly among the formulations. Brands A, B, C, and E exhibited better spreadability, non-greasy texture, and easier washability, which are desirable characteristics for improving consumer acceptance and patient compliance. In contrast, Brand D demonstrated comparatively higher greasiness and lower washability, possibly due to differences in the type or proportion of oily components and emulsifying agents used in the formulation. Such variations may influence user preference without necessarily affecting product safety or therapeutic performance.

The skin irritancy test revealed that none of the formulations produced visible signs of erythema, edema, or allergic reactions, indicating good dermatological compatibility. These findings suggest that all evaluated products are suitable for topical application under the study conditions and possess a low potential for causing skin irritation.

Microbiological evaluation demonstrated the absence of objectionable microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, in all formulations, indicating compliance with acceptable microbiological quality standards for topical cosmetic preparations. The absence of microbial contamination reflects good manufacturing practices and appropriate preservation systems, both of which are essential for ensuring product safety and extending shelf life.

Overall, all five marketed cold cream formulations satisfied the evaluated quality parameters, although minor differences were observed in their physicochemical characteristics and application properties. Among the tested formulations, Brand B demonstrated comparatively better overall performance by exhibiting favorable physicochemical characteristics, good spreadability, acceptable washability, and satisfactory microbiological and dermatological safety. Nevertheless, statistical analysis of larger sample sizes and long-term stability studies would provide stronger evidence to support comparative performance claims.

The findings of the present study contribute to the quality assessment of marketed cold cream formulations and provide useful information for pharmaceutical researchers, cosmetic manufacturers, healthcare professionals, regulatory authorities, and consumers. Future investigations should include accelerated stability studies, instrumental skin hydration measurements, rheological evaluation, and in vivo clinical assessment to further establish the efficacy, stability, and consumer acceptability of marketed cold cream products.

CONCLUSION:

Based on the comprehensive evaluation, Brand B emerged as the best cold cream among the five brands, as it excelled in meeting the quality standards, demonstrated non- greasiness and ease of washability, and showed excellent safety performance.

REFERENCES

1. Chavan, P., Kalshetti, M., & Navindgikar, N. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of Polyherbal Cream. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, 75–77. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i4.39086
2. Varsha Barethiya*, Abhijeet Kukde, Ashish Badwaik, Dr. Alpana Asnani, Dr. Gouri Dixit, Formulation And Evaluation Of Vitamin E Enriched Cold Cream With Almond Oil As An Internal Phase, International Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review And Research,2020; 63(2): 71-75.
3. Sani, A., Gaya, M. B., & Abubakar, F. A. (2016). Determination of some heavy metals in selected cosmetic products sold in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. Toxicology Reports, 3, 866–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.11.001
4. Barnes, T. M., Mijaljica, D., Townley, J. P., Spada, F., & Harrison, I. P. (2021). Vehicles for drug delivery and cosmetic moisturizers: Review and comparison. Pharmaceutics, 13(12), 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122012
5. Kumar, A., Kaur, R., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Gehlot, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2022). New insights into water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) double emulsions: Properties, fabrication, instability mechanism, and food applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 128, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.07.016
6. Formulation and evaluation of Multipurpose Herbal Cream. (2015). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(11), 1495–1498. https://doi.org/10.21275/v4i11.nov151515
7. DHYANI, A., Chander, V., & Singh, N. (2019). Formulation and evaluation of Multipurpose Herbal Cream. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 9(2), 341–343. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v9i2.2540
8. Sk. Uddandu Saheb, Aduri Prakash Reddy, K. Rajitha, B. Sravani, B. Vanitha Formulation And Evaluation Of Cream From Naturally Containing Plant Extracts World Journal Of Pharmacy And Pharmaceutical Sciences 20018 ; 7(5) : 851-862.