We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
1,2,3,4,5,6 Royal School of Pharmacy, The Assam Royal Global University
7 Institute of Pharmacy, Assam Don Bosco University
Extraction techniques play a vital role in modern scientific research by enabling the isolation of valuable bioactive compounds from natural and synthetic sources. Over the years, extraction methods have evolved from traditional approaches to advanced technologies aimed at improving efficiency, selectivity, and environmental sustainability. Conventional extraction methods such as maceration, percolation, Soxhlet extraction, and distillation remain widely used because of their simplicity, affordability, and ease of operation. However, these methods often require large volumes of solvents, longer extraction times, and high energy consumption, which may reduce the quality of heat-sensitive compounds. To overcome these limitations, emerging extraction technologies including microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, enzyme-assisted extraction, and pressurized liquid extraction have gained significant attention. These modern approaches offer advantages such as reduced extraction time, lower solvent usage, improved extraction yield, and enhanced preservation of bioactive constituents. Despite these benefits, advanced techniques may involve high operational costs, sophisticated instrumentation, and technical expertise, limiting their large-scale application in some settings.
Medicinal plants nowadays are regarded with great attention as an important source of medicinal phytochemicals which have a potential role in the development of new drugs [1,2]. This can be attributed to its natural origin, accessibility within aboriginal communities, low-cost, ease of administration and potentially even more tolerable [3], lower drug resistance and minimal side as well as negative effects. A medicinal plant is an element of a plant that contains the active ingredient or bioactive compounds (metabolites), otherwise known as secondary metabolites [4]. The term primary plant constituents relates to the different nutritional compounds of common sugars, proteins, amino acids and chlorophyll that are constituent parts of such a medicinal plant. These are phytochemical residues derived from the plant known for their biological activities. Our secondary metabolites or the secondary plant constituents includes of alkaloids, saponins, terpenoids, flavonoids, phenolic compounds and tannins [4.
Research in this natural medicinal herb begins with process for extraction of key bioactive phyto-nutrients, which represents a significant step in the manufacture of herbal compounds. Extraction: This is the fundamental step in isolating, identifying and utilizing primary metabolites from various plant extracts. [6]. The present techniques for extracting essentialoils, fat and oils are Soxhlet [6], hydrodistillation[5] and maceration with alcohol and others [7]. The compounds derived in this way from the plants are largely impure, unrefined powders, semisolids, or liquids to be used exclusively topically/orally. such as infusions, decoctions, fluid extracts, powdered extracts and tinctures. [8].
Parameters to be Considered before Extraction:
Methods:
Pre-extraction preparation of plant samples:
Preparation of plant sample :The very first step of the study of herbal medicinal plants. It is done to conserve the biomolecules in plants. Plant samples (leaves, bark, roots, fruits and flowers) may be obtained from dried or fresh plants. Preservation of phytochemicals in the plants are affected not only by drying but also by grinding and drying [11].
Fresh vs. dried samples:
In the research of medicinal plants, either fresh or dried sample is utilized. Dried sample is preferred for most of studies as compared to fresh sample because of time involvement in designing the experiment. In addition to time limitation, all fresh samples are delicate and deteriorate faster than dried ones[12]
Grinded vs. powdered samples:
We further increase the contact surface between samples and solvent by reducing particle size. Grinding and powdered samples made small size but powdered samples have their own advantage because they are more homogenized and his size is smaller. This is particularly important, since for basic extraction to occur the solvent needs to be touching the analytes in a sample smaller than 0.5 mm[key] [13].
Drying of plant samples by air, microwave, oven and freeze-drying (lyophilisation):
Table no 1: Drying of plant samples by air, microwave, oven and freeze-drying (lyophilisation): [14,15,16]
|
Drying Method |
Principle |
Typical Conditions |
Time Required |
Effect on Phytochemicals |
Limitations |
|
Air-drying |
Natural moisture removal under ambient temperature |
The plant parts are bound, then hanged for drying air |
in 3 to 7 days up to several months |
Without the use of high heat, heat-labile compounds are preserved |
Best for the preservation of phenolics and other heat-sensitive phytochemicals |
|
Microwave |
Electromagnetic fields induce dipolar gyration → quick internal heating |
microwave fields in short bursts |
Minutes to hours |
Damages the sensitive phytochemicals due to quick heating |
Potential for overheating and compound declination |
|
Oven |
Thermal energy use for evaporation due to loss of moistness |
Controlled temperature of hot air at around 40–45 °C for a few hours |
Hours |
antioxidants may get degrade due to heat |
temperature needs to be optimized |
|
Freeze-drying |
Sublimates the frozen water contained in the tissue under vacuum |
Pre-freeze at −20 to −80 °C; vacuum drying |
24–48 hours |
Sustain the highest level of phenolic compounds and thermally sensitive phytochemicals |
Expensive equipment is required; process is complicated; sample loss |
Types of Extraction: There are generally two types of Extraction method, that are:
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
It is simple and non-complex method. |
Solvent requirement is more. |
|
Energy saving process. |
Slow process and time consuming. |
|
Skilled operators are not required. |
Not exhaustively extract the drug. |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Requires less time than maceration. |
More solvent needed |
|
Suitable method for potent and costly drugs. |
Skilled person is required. |
|
Extraction of thermolabile constituents can be possible. |
Requires more time than soxhlation. |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Easy to perform |
Not for heat sensitive compound |
|
No trained operator |
- |
|
Suitable for heat stable compound |
- |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Smaller quantity of solvents compared to maceration |
The process allows manipulation of limited variables. |
|
Repeatedly can use solvent |
The extraction time is lengthy and the process is labor intensive. |
|
Does not require filtration after extraction |
Exposure to hazardous flammable liquid organic solvents, with potential toxic emissions during extraction. |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Higher oil yield. |
Complete extraction is not possible. |
|
Oil quality is more reproducible. |
Heat control is different |
|
Cheap and environment friendly. |
The process is uneconomical. |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Easiest and simple method. |
Time taking process |
|
No trained operator required |
Not suitable for heat sensitive compounds |
Microwave assisted Extraction: This method uses microwave energy to partition analytes from sample matrix in solvent. Microwave radiation interact with polar material interface/near surface of the material and conduction heat transfer. Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE) is an extraction method that use microwave energy to help transfer the phytochemicals from the sample phase into the reaction solvent. This dipoles is the reason polar solvent and the polar compounds of sample are heated through microwaves. Consequently, these compounds get heated up quickly at the surface before the heat is transferred. The hydrogen bonds break due to the microwave rotating the molecules. This allows for the movement of ions made free by the dissolution as well as solvent which has also penetrated into the matrix. Its because non-polar solvents are low absorbers of microwave energy and thus do not heat well under microwaves. Since MAE is a selective method for polar compounds, polar solvents with high dielectric constants are suitable 23.
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Reduced extraction time |
Risk of thermal degradation |
|
Lower solvent consumption |
Not suitable for heat-sensitive compounds |
|
Effective for phenolic compounds |
More suitable for low-molecular-weight phenolics than complex polyphenols
|
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Solvent free extract |
Requires high-pressure pumps, vessels. |
|
Fast extraction rate |
High pressure requirements -Typically 100–400 bar |
|
Highly pure extract |
Not ideal for very polar compounds |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Less extraction time |
Use of ultrasound energy more than 20 kHz may influence the active phytochemicals |
|
Less solvent consumption |
Possible degradation of sensitive compounds |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Much faster than conventional Soxhlet |
High equipment cost |
|
Uses less solvent |
Not suitable for very heat-sensitive compounds |
|
Better penetration |
Limited sample size |
|
Merit |
Demerit |
|
Very fast extraction |
Possible degradation of sensitive compounds |
|
High yield |
Equipment cost |
|
Short processing time |
Noise and vibration |
CONCLUSION:
Extraction techniques continue to evolve alongside the growing demands of scientific research and industrial applications. While conventional methods remain important because of their simplicity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, modern extraction technologies provide improved efficiency, faster processing, and better preservation of valuable compounds. Each method has its own strengths and limitations, making the choice of technique highly dependent on the nature of the sample, desired yield, available resources, and research objectives.
In recent years, there has been a strong shift toward greener and more sustainable extraction approaches that minimize solvent use, reduce energy consumption, and improve environmental safety. Although advanced technologies may require higher investment and technical expertise, their long-term benefits in terms of quality, productivity, and sustainability make them increasingly valuable in modern research.
Rather than replacing conventional methods entirely, emerging extraction techniques should be viewed as complementary tools that expand the possibilities of scientific investigation. A balanced understanding of both traditional and advanced approaches can help researchers select the most suitable method for specific applications. Continued innovation and optimization in extraction science are expected to support future developments in pharmaceuticals, food technology, biotechnology, and natural product research
REFERENCES
Neelakshi Sharma, Bipul Nath, Rishika Choudhury, Ananya Saha, Suman Basak, Chayanika Talukdar, Manas Jyoti Kapil, Extraction Techniques in Modern Research: Conventional Methods, Emerging Technologies, and their Benefits and Challenges, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 506-516. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.20505301
10.5281/zenodo.20505301