View Article

Abstract

Digera muricata, Amaranthus viridis, flaxseed, pumpkin seed, peanut, amla, jaggery, and clarified butter were utilized in this study to make and evaluate a natural nutritional bar. Formulation F3 was selected as the best formulation after three were prepared because of its better overall performance. The produced bar's physicochemical, phytochemical, nutritional, and organoleptic properties were evaluated. The nutritional bar's favorable sensory attributes, sufficient hardness, low friability, and suitable moisture content all suggested good stability and shelf life. Nutritional analysis revealed the presence of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, dietary fiber, iron, and energy value. Phytochemical screening confirmed the presence of bioactive compounds with antioxidant potential. The results of the study show that the developed bar can be used as a functional food product that is free of preservatives and healthful

Keywords

Digera muricata, Amaranthus viridis, Flaxseed, Pumpkin Seed, Amla, Nutritional Analysis, Phytochemical Screening, Sensory Assessment, Iron-Rich Food

Introduction

× Popup Image

Due to consumer demand, public curiosity, and continuing study into their characteristics and prospective uses, nutraceuticals and functional foods are becoming more and more popular.[1] A nutraceutical, according to Stephen DeFelice, is a food or component of a diet that provides health or medical benefits, such as illness prevention or treatment. However, the phrase is mostly employed in marketing and has no legal definition.

Energy bars contain natural ingredients like cereals, nuts, dried fruits, sugars, and herbs, making them nutritionally valuable for athletes, active individuals, and those needing an energy-dense snack.[2]An energy bar is a convenient, bar-shaped food designed to boost physical energy, enriched with vitamins, minerals, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates.[3] The global market offers diverse bar types, including high-protein, high-fiber, high-energy, and vitamin and mineral-rich bars with appealing sensory properties.[4]

1.Concept of Nutraceuticals

The idea of nutraceuticals has begun to be recognized as one way to prevent certain illnesses. In the past, however, there was no way to verify food's ability to prevent illness. [5]

2.NUTRACEUTICAL INCLUDES

A product that contains one or more substances, such as vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids, concentrates, metabolites, extracts, or their mixtures, is referred to as a dietary supplement.[4] Vitamins, minerals, bioactive plant chemicals, and functional supplements are examples of nutraceuticals that are essential for preserving health and preventing illness.

Their global use has grown due to increased awareness of lifestyle disorders, preventive healthcare, and the evidence-based benefits of targeted supplementation. [5]

1.3 FUNCTIONAL FOODS

Functional foods contain essential nutrients beyond basic growth and maintenance requirements. Citrus fruits, for example, are well-known functional foods with antiviral, antioxidant, anticancer, and immune-stimulating properties. [3]

  1.4 IMPORTANCE IN MODERN HEALTHCARE

The nutraceutical and functional food industries offer significant opportunities to address modern health challenges. Advancing this field requires collaboration among researchers, industry stakeholders, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and consumers to promote evidence-based practices and drive ongoing innovation.[7]

  1.5 IMPORTANCE OF NATURAL INGREDIENTS

Natural substances are well known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immune-boosting properties. [8]

  2. NUTRITIONAL PROFILE OF ACTIVE INGREDIENTS

 1. DIGERA MURICATA

Botanical Name: Digera muricata

Family: Amaranthaceae

Common Name: Latjira

Digera muricata is a wild edible plant rich in carbohydrates, proteins, dietary fiber, vitamins A and C, minerals such as calcium, iron, potassium and magnesium, and phytochemicals including flavonoids, phenolics, and tannins. It is traditionally used for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, and digestive support properties. In a nutraceutical bar, it serves as a functional herbal ingredient, natural antioxidant source, nutrient enhancer, and digestive fiber source.[9]

1.AMARANTHUS VIRIDIS

Botanical Name: Amaranthus

 Family: Amaranthaceae

Common Name: Green Amaranthus

Amaranthus viridis is a leafy vegetable that is high in protein, essential amino acids, dietary fiber, vitamins A, C, and folate, as well as minerals including calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc. It has long been used to treat skin conditions and dysentery as well as for its anti-inflammatory, diuretic, and digestive health qualities. It contributes to plant-based nutritional fortification in a nutraceutical bar by acting as a fiber-rich, micronutrient-boosting, protein-enriching functional ingredient with antioxidant qualities. [10]

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1. Materials:

  1. 1.Amaranthus viridis
  2. 2.Digera muricata
  3. 3.Flaxseed                                                                             
  4. 4.Peanut Seed       
  5. Pumpkin Seed
  6. 6.Amla
  7. Cardamom                                                            
  8. 8.Clarified Butter

3.2 METHOD OF PREPARATION OF NUTRITIONAL BAR

3.3 Formulation Table

Table 2. Formulation table

SN

Ingredients

F1(g)

F2(g)

F3(g)

1

Amaranthus Viridis

4

6

8

2

Digera Muricata

4

6

8

3

Flaxseed

3

3

4

4

Pumpkin Seed

3

3

4

5

Peanut

6

5

3

6

Amla

2

2

2

7

Jaggery

11

8

4

8

Clarified Butter

2

2

2

 

Figure 1. Formulated Nutrtional Bar

“Formulation F3 was selected as the optimized formulation for further evaluation studies due to its better overall performance, whereas F1 and F2 were not selected.”

4. EVALUATION PARAMTERS:(AOAC International (2000). Official Methods of Analysis.)

The formulated natural nutritional bar was evaluated for various physicochemical, nutritional, and sensory parameters to assess its quality, stability, and acceptability. Standard analytical methods were used to determine the properties of the prepared formulation.[17]

4.1 Organoleptic Properties

Principle:Organoleptic evaluation is a sensory assessment technique that uses sensory attributes like color, taste, odor, texture, appearance, and general acceptability to determine the acceptability and quality of food products. The assessment, which is carried out utilizing human senses, aids in ascertaining consumer preference for the developed product.

Procedure: A panel of volunteers assessed the prepared nutritional bars for organoleptic qualities. Color, taste, odor, texture, appearance, and general acceptability were among the factors assessed. Based on sensory perception, each characteristic was meticulously monitored and documented. Under typical lighting conditions, the bars were examined visually. While odor and appearance were evaluated through sensory inspection, taste and texture were determined by chewing the sample. The combined sensory reactions were used to assess the formulation's overall acceptability.

Table 3. Organoleptic evaluation of formulated nutritional bar

SN

Parameter Evaluated

Observation

1

Color

Greenish brown

2

Taste

Sweet and pleasant

3

Odor

Characteristic aromatic odour

4

Texture

Soft and compact

5

Appearance

Uniform and attractive

6

Overall Acceptability

Acceptable

4.2 Weight Variation:

Principle: Weight variation test determines the uniformity of weight among prepared bars.

Procedure:

  1. Ten nutritional bars were selected randomly.
  2. 2.Each bar was weighed individually using a digital balance.
  3. 3.Average weight was calculated.

Table 4. Weight variation test of nutritional bar

SN

Weight of Bar(g)

1

34.8

2

35.1

3

35.0

4

34.9

5

35.2

6

35.0

7

34.7

8

35.1

9

35.0

10

34.9

10

34.9

     

Formula:

  • Average Weight= Total Weight of Bars/ No. of Bar
  • Average Weight= 34.97g
    1. Thickness Test

Thickness test is performed to determine the uniformity in size and shape of the formulated nutritional bars. Uniform thickness ensures proper moulding and consistency of the formulation. The average thickness of the formulated nutritional bars was found to be 15.01 mm, indicating uniform size and proper moulding of the formulation.

    1. Hardness Test

Result: The hardness of the formulated nutritional bar was evaluated using a hardness tester to determine its mechanical strength and resistance to breakage. The hardness value was found to be 4.8 kg/cm², indicating good structural integrity and satisfactory compactness of the prepared formulation

4.5 Friability Test

Principle

Friability test determines the ability of the bar to resist crumbling during handling.

Procedure:

  1. 1.Pre-weighed bars were placed in a friabilator.
  2. 2.The instrument was operated for 100 revolutions.
  3. 3.Bars were reweighed after dust removal.

Formula:

Friability%= W1-W2/W1*100

Where:

                 W1= Initial weight

                W2= Final weight

Calculation:  Initial weight (𝑊1)= 35.00 g

                    Final weight (𝑊2)=34.78 g

Friability (%) =35.00-34.78/35.00*100=0.62%

The percentage friability of the formulated nutritional bar was found to be 0.62 %, indicating good mechanical resistance and stability.

    1. Moisture Content

Principle:  Moisture content determines the amount of water present in the formulation. Low moisture content improves shelf life and stability.

Procedure:

  1. About 5 g of powdered sample was weighed.
  2. The sample was dried at 105°C in a hot air oven until constant weight was obtained.

Formula: Moisture Content (%) =Initial Weight- Final Weight/Initial weight*100

Calculation:

Empty Plate Weight = 28.57gm

Initial weight (plate+ sample) = 30.61gm

Final constant weight after drying =  30.50 g

Weight of sample=2g

Moisture Content (%) = 30.61−30.50 × 100 = 5.5%

2

The moisture content of the formulated nutritional bar was found to be 5.5 %, indicating good stability and reduced chances of microbial growth.

    1. Ash Value

Principle: Ash value indicates the total inorganic mineral content present in the sample. Ash value indicates purity and mineral content.

Procedure: 1. About 2 g of sample was incinerated in a silica crucible at 550°C until carbon-free ash was obtained.

                     2. The ash was cooled and weighed.

Formula:
Ash Value (%)=Weight of AshWeight of Sample×100

 

1)Acid insoluble ash:

Given:

  • W1(Empty crucible weight)=18.40
  • W2(Crucible+drug before heating)=20.41
  • W3(Crucible+Ash after heating)=18.44

Calculation:=18.44-18.4020.41-18.40×100=1.99%
 

 

 

Acid insoluble ash = 1.99%

2) Water Soluble Ash

Given:

  • W1=21.04
  • W2=23.67
  • W3=21.17

Calculation: =21.17-21.0423.67-21.04×100

 

 

=4.94%

 

Water soluble ash = 4.94%

3) Sulphated AshTop of FormBottom of Form

The nutritious bar's ash value was determined to be 7.76%, suggesting that the formulation contained a significant amount of minerals. Using a muffle furnace set at 550°C until carbon-free ash was produced, the ash value of the nutritional bar was calculated. To determine the total ash content, the sample was burned in a silica crucible using a muffle furnace. (AOAC International, 2000). Official Analysis Techniques.

Phytochemical Screening of Plants: Qualitative phytochemical screening of the formulated natural nutritional bar was carried out to identify the presence of various bioactive constituents responsible for nutritional and therapeutic properties. The screening was performed using standard qualitative chemical tests.

Table 5. Phytochemical Screening of Digera Muricata and Amaranthus viridis

SN

Test

Observation of Digera Muricata

Observation of Amaranthus Viridis

Phytoconstituent

1

Ferric chloride test

Dark green colour

Dark green colour observed

Phenol

2

Wagner’s test

Orange precipitate

Orange precipitate observed

Alkaloid

3

Keller–Kilani test

Brownish green colour

Brownish green colour observed

Glycosides

4

Foam test

Stable foam formed

Stable foam formed

Saponins

5

Ferric chloride test

Green colour

Green colour observed

Tannins

6

Molisch’s test

Violet ring formed

Violet ring formed

Carbohydrates

REFERENCES

  1. Kesharwani RK, Vyas N, Jain S, Raghuvanshi R, Sharma AK. Nutraceutical and functional food as future food: A review. Der Pharm Lett. 2010;2(1):106-116.
  2. Kalra EK. Nutraceutical-definition and introduction. AAPS PharmSci. 2003;5(3):27-28.
  3. Ho LH, Tang JYH, Akma SM, Aiman HM, Roslan A. Development of novel energy snack bar by utilizing local Malaysian ingredients. Int Food Res J. 2016;23(5):2280-2285.
  4. Rajam RP, Murugesan G, Vadivel Kumar K, Menachisundaram V. Nutraceuticals: review. World J Pharm Res. 2019;8(11):1354-1374. doi:10.20959/wjpr201911-15964.
  5. Abdel-Salam FF, Ibrahim RM, Ali MIK. Formulation and evaluation of high energy-protein bars as a nutritional supplement for sports athletics. Am J Food Sci Technol. 2022;10(1):53-65. doi:10.12691/ajfst-10-1-8.
  6. Vishvakarma P, Mandal S, Verma A. A review on current aspects of nutraceuticals and dietary supplements. Int J Pharma Prof Res. 2023;14(1):78-84.
  7. Yadav PD, Prajapati L, Thadoda DK, Sharma S, Trivedi R. Therapeutic and preventive potential of nutraceuticals and functional foods in modern healthcare. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2026;11(3):449-457. doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26mar385.
  8. Raina S, Pandoh A. Importance of nutraceuticals in various diseases and human health: A comprehensive review. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol. 2021;15(11):41-55. doi:10.9790/2402-1511014155.
  9. Ban A, Masal N, Mohite A, Mohite S. Formulation and evaluation of instant energy bar. Int J Pharm Sci. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15522138.
  10. Mathad P, Mety SS. Phytochemical and antimicrobial activity of Digera muricata (L.) Mart. E J Chem. 2010;7(1):275-280.
  11. Ragasa CY, Austria JPM, Subosa AF, Torres OB, Shen CC. Chemical constituents of Amaranthus viridis. Chem Nat Compd. 2015;51(1):146-147.
  12. Stevenson DG, Eller FJ, Wang L, Jane JL, Wang T, Inglett GE. Oil and tocopherol content and composition of pumpkin seed oil in 12 cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(10):4005-4013.
  13. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy. 4th ed. New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2014.
  14. Gonzales E, Draganchuk M. Studies on sensory properties of nutritional bars. Food Qual Prefer. 2003;14(2):123-129

Reference

  1. Kesharwani RK, Vyas N, Jain S, Raghuvanshi R, Sharma AK. Nutraceutical and functional food as future food: A review. Der Pharm Lett. 2010;2(1):106-116.
  2. Kalra EK. Nutraceutical-definition and introduction. AAPS PharmSci. 2003;5(3):27-28.
  3. Ho LH, Tang JYH, Akma SM, Aiman HM, Roslan A. Development of novel energy snack bar by utilizing local Malaysian ingredients. Int Food Res J. 2016;23(5):2280-2285.
  4. Rajam RP, Murugesan G, Vadivel Kumar K, Menachisundaram V. Nutraceuticals: review. World J Pharm Res. 2019;8(11):1354-1374. doi:10.20959/wjpr201911-15964.
  5. Abdel-Salam FF, Ibrahim RM, Ali MIK. Formulation and evaluation of high energy-protein bars as a nutritional supplement for sports athletics. Am J Food Sci Technol. 2022;10(1):53-65. doi:10.12691/ajfst-10-1-8.
  6. Vishvakarma P, Mandal S, Verma A. A review on current aspects of nutraceuticals and dietary supplements. Int J Pharma Prof Res. 2023;14(1):78-84.
  7. Yadav PD, Prajapati L, Thadoda DK, Sharma S, Trivedi R. Therapeutic and preventive potential of nutraceuticals and functional foods in modern healthcare. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2026;11(3):449-457. doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26mar385.
  8. Raina S, Pandoh A. Importance of nutraceuticals in various diseases and human health: A comprehensive review. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol. 2021;15(11):41-55. doi:10.9790/2402-1511014155.
  9. Ban A, Masal N, Mohite A, Mohite S. Formulation and evaluation of instant energy bar. Int J Pharm Sci. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15522138.
  10. Mathad P, Mety SS. Phytochemical and antimicrobial activity of Digera muricata (L.) Mart. E J Chem. 2010;7(1):275-280.
  11. Ragasa CY, Austria JPM, Subosa AF, Torres OB, Shen CC. Chemical constituents of Amaranthus viridis. Chem Nat Compd. 2015;51(1):146-147.
  12. Stevenson DG, Eller FJ, Wang L, Jane JL, Wang T, Inglett GE. Oil and tocopherol content and composition of pumpkin seed oil in 12 cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(10):4005-4013.
  13. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy. 4th ed. New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2014.
  14. Gonzales E, Draganchuk M. Studies on sensory properties of nutritional bars. Food Qual Prefer. 2003;14(2):123-129

Photo
Sanika Soor
Corresponding author

S.C.S.M.S.S Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon

Photo
Sapna Akhade
Co-author

S.C.S.M.S.S Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon

Photo
Snehal Vaidya
Co-author

S.C.S.M.S.S Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon

Photo
Nilesh Chachda
Co-author

S.C.S.M.S.S Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon

Sanika Soor, Sapna Akhade, Snehal Vaidya, Nilesh Chachda, Formulation and Evaluation of a Natural Nutritional Bar, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 7126-7133. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.20997478

More related articles
4D Bioprinting: Shaping the Future of Dynamic and ...
Tanaya Markande, Snehal Nage , Pranjali Narwade , Aarti More, San...
The Formulation and Evaluation of Poly Herbal Soap...
Kiran Makwana, Abdul Basit, Shivam Singh , Rahal Shah, Dhara Sidd...
Preliminary Physicochemical Characterization of Iguratimod Using UV Spectroscopy...
Sankar C., Babitha L., Vasanthkumar A., Sabitha S., Naresh Kumar...
Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and E...
Rameez Raja, Amar Pal Singh, Ajeet Pal Singh, Rajesh Kumar...
Comparative Evaluation of Anticonvulsant Potential of Clerodendrum viscosum and ...
Rohini Chavan, Dr. Swati Deshmukh , Neelu Yadav, Rutuja Mule, Dr. Swati Jogdand...
Related Articles
RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the simultaneous estimation of Cob...
Dr. P. V. Madhavi Latha , Dr. P Uma Devi, K Suvarna, P. Siva Lalitha...
Development and Evaluation of Herbal Gel Formulations Using Advanced Analytical ...
Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Dr. Pavan Kumar, Dr. Vipin Kesarwani, Vasim Khan...
4D Bioprinting: Shaping the Future of Dynamic and Smart Tissue Regeneration...
Tanaya Markande, Snehal Nage , Pranjali Narwade , Aarti More, Sanika Nalande, Sumeet Bhilwade ...
More related articles
4D Bioprinting: Shaping the Future of Dynamic and Smart Tissue Regeneration...
Tanaya Markande, Snehal Nage , Pranjali Narwade , Aarti More, Sanika Nalande, Sumeet Bhilwade ...
The Formulation and Evaluation of Poly Herbal Soap for Treatment of Acne and It...
Kiran Makwana, Abdul Basit, Shivam Singh , Rahal Shah, Dhara Siddhpuria, Krushal Sapariya...
4D Bioprinting: Shaping the Future of Dynamic and Smart Tissue Regeneration...
Tanaya Markande, Snehal Nage , Pranjali Narwade , Aarti More, Sanika Nalande, Sumeet Bhilwade ...
The Formulation and Evaluation of Poly Herbal Soap for Treatment of Acne and It...
Kiran Makwana, Abdul Basit, Shivam Singh , Rahal Shah, Dhara Siddhpuria, Krushal Sapariya...