View Article

  • A Review of Analytical Methods for the Determination of Clindamycin in Pharmaceutical Products and Environmental Samples

  • 1Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, 402103, India

    2,3,4 Shree saraswati institute of pharmacy,tonadavli , 416602,India.

Abstract

Antibiotics represent one of the most consequential classes of pharmaceuticals from an environmental standpoint, with growing evidence of their adverse effects on aquatic and soil ecosystems. Clindamycin (CLN), a lincosamide antibiotic that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by targeting the 50S ribosomal subunit, is active against Gram-positive aerobes and a broad range of anaerobes. It is also employed in the management of acne vulgaris, toxoplasmosis, malaria, Pneumocystis pneumonia, and babesiosis. The continuous discharge of CLN and its metabolites into water bodies—through incomplete metabolism, improper drug disposal, and inadequate wastewater treatment—has prompted growing concern about its environmental fate and ecotoxicological implications. Reliable analytical methods are therefore indispensable for its accurate detection and quantification across complex matrices. This review systematically examines the principal analytical techniques reported for CLN determination in pharmaceutical dosage forms and environmental samples. The methods covered include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV and mass spectrometric detection, spectrophotometric and kinetic spectrophotometric procedures, electrochemical techniques such as stripping voltammetry and potentiometry, micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and chemiluminescence assays. For each approach, the working principle, matrix applicability, sensitivity, and key validation parameters are discussed. The review aims to serve as a concise reference for analysts selecting appropriate methods for routine quality control, stability studies, or environmental monitoring of this clinically important antibiotic.

Keywords

Clindamycin; analytical methods; HPLC; environmental contamination; pharmaceutical analysis; electrochemical detection

Introduction

× Popup Image

The rapid expansion of pharmaceutical manufacturing over the past five decades has created a class of environmental contaminants that regulatory frameworks were not originally designed to address. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) enter the environment through multiple routes—excretion of unchanged drug and active metabolites, hospital and household effluents, and the disposal of unused medicines—accumulating in surface water, groundwater, and sediments at concentrations typically in the nanogram-to-microgram per litre range.1,2

Although individual environmental concentrations appear low, the continuous, pseudo-persistent nature of pharmaceutical input means that aquatic organisms face chronic exposure rather than episodic contact. Among the major therapeutic classes, antibiotics attract particular concern because their biological activity does not simply diminish upon environmental entry; instead, sub-inhibitory concentrations can selectively pressure microbial communities and enrich for antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), which are now recognized as emerging environmental pollutants in their own right.3,4

Globally, the three pharmaceutical categories most widely detected in the environment are anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, and analgesics. Veterinary use compounds this burden: antibiotics administered in livestock production are frequently excreted largely unchanged and reach soil and aquatic compartments via manure application and agricultural runoff.5–9

Within this broad antibiotic landscape, certain drugs command disproportionate attention based on their physicochemical properties, environmental stability, and ecotoxicological profile. Clindamycin, a semisynthetic derivative of lincomycin produced by Streptomyces lincolnensis, is one such compound. Its high water solubility, moderate lipophilicity (log P ≈ 2.16), and limited photodegradation in neutral conditions facilitate its persistence in aquatic systems. CLN has been detected in hospital effluents, municipal wastewater treatment plant influents and effluents, and in surface water bodies across multiple continents, underscoring the inadequacy of conventional treatment processes in its removal.10–14

Clindamycin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding irreversibly to the peptidyl transferase centre of the 50S ribosomal subunit, preventing peptide bond formation and terminating chain elongation. This mechanism confers activity against Gram-positive aerobic bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp.), anaerobic organisms (e.g., Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium perfringens), and several protozoan pathogens. Clinically, CLN is used in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections, intra-abdominal sepsis, aspiration pneumonia, osteomyelitis, acne vulgaris, and as prophylaxis or treatment in toxoplasmosis, malaria, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, and babesiosis.15,16

From an environmental perspective, the antimicrobial activity that makes CLN therapeutically valuable also makes it ecotoxicologically relevant. Studies have demonstrated that CLN-containing waters exert selective pressure on environmental microbiota, alter microbial community structure, and co-select for resistance determinants associated with other antibiotic classes through cross-resistance or co-resistance mechanisms.17–19

The spread of ARGs in environmental compartments is now considered one of the defining public health challenges of the coming decades. Even though wastewater treatment measurably reduces the abundance of ARGs compared with untreated sewage, residual resistance determinants in treated effluents continue to be released into receiving water bodies, from where they can disseminate via horizontal gene transfer—particularly through conjugative plasmids—across geographically distant microbial communities.20–24

Robust analytical methods are therefore essential at two levels: (i) in pharmaceutical quality control, to ensure accurate potency in finished dosage forms and to characterise degradation behaviour, and (ii) in environmental monitoring, to detect and quantify CLN at trace levels across varied and complex matrices. The physicochemical profile of CLN—specifically its weak UV chromophore (maximum absorbance near 195 nm) and the absence of a strong fluorophore—complicates detection by conventional photometric approaches and has driven interest in alternative or hyphenated techniques.25,26

This review compiles and critically appraises the analytical literature on CLN determination in pharmaceutical products and environmental samples published through 2024. The methods addressed span HPLC-UV, HPLC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS, spectrophotometry, kinetic spectrophotometry, titrimetry, stripping voltammetry, potentiometry, capillary electrophoresis, micellar electrokinetic chromatography, and chemiluminescence. Table 1 summarises the key physicochemical properties of CLN that underpin method selection; Tables 2 and 3 provide comparative performance data for chromatographic and non-chromatographic methods, respectively.

 

TABLE 1: PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF CLINDAMYCIN

PROPERTY

DETAILS

IUPAC Name

Methyl 7-chloro-6,7,8-trideoxy-6-[[(1-methyl-4-propyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)carbonyl]amino]-1-thio-L-threo-α-D-galacto-octopyranoside

Molecular Formula

C??H??ClN?O?S

Molecular Weight

424.98 g/mol (hydrochloride: 461.44 g/mol)

CAS Number

18323-44-9 (base); 21462-39-5 (HCl salt)

Appearance

White to off-white crystalline powder

Solubility

Freely soluble in water; sparingly soluble in ethanol; practically insoluble in organic solvents

pKa

7.6

log P

2.16

UV Absorption (max)

195 nm (weak absorption; lacks a strong chromophore)

Protein Binding

~93%

Half-life

2–3 hours (extended in severe hepatic impairment)

Mechanism of Action

Inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit

Antimicrobial Spectrum

Gram-positive aerobes, anaerobes, and some protozoal pathogens (e.g., Toxoplasma, Plasmodium)

CLN-P = clindamycin phosphate; CLN-HCl = clindamycin hydrochloride; NR = not reported; CPH = clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride

 

ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF CLINDAMYCIN

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

HPLC remains the workhorse technique for CLN determination, largely because reversed-phase systems using C18 stationary phases afford excellent selectivity for the drug across diverse matrices, and the method is amenable to coupling with UV, fluorescence, and mass spectrometric detectors. The weak UV absorption of CLN at 195 nm is a practical limitation for sensitivity, but short-wavelength UV detection is nonetheless widely employed for pharmaceutical-grade samples where concentrations are high and matrix interference is manageable.27

Vella and colleagues described a straightforward reversed-phase HPLC-UV method for CLN determination in human plasma. Separation was performed on a 250 × 4.6 mm C18 column (5 µm particle size) using an isocratic mobile phase of acetonitrile and 0.02 M disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 2.9) in a 29:71 v/v ratio, with UV detection at 195 nm. The approach achieved a lower limit of quantification suitable for pharmacokinetic monitoring of plasma samples.28

For veterinary applications, Batzias et al. developed and validated an HPLC-UV method capable of quantifying CLN in dog blood serum at concentrations as low as 80 ng/mL. Sample preparation involved protein precipitation with acetonitrile followed by liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane. Chromatographic separation on a RP-C18 column used tetra-n-butylammonium hydrogen sulfate as an ion-pairing agent, which improved retention and peak shape for this basic analyte. The assay was validated over a linear concentration range that covered clinically relevant serum levels in companion animals.29

Clindamycin phosphate (CLN-P), the water-soluble prodrug used in injectable and topical formulations, has been the focus of several HPLC methods targeting gel and vaginal formulations. Stankovic et al. described a RP-HPLC procedure for CLN-P in vaginal gels, demonstrating specificity for the prodrug against its degradation products. Modi and Shah subsequently developed a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of CLN-P, adapalene, methylparaben, and phenoxyethanol in topical acne gel formulations. Chromatographic resolution was achieved on an XBridge C18 column; CLN-P and the preservatives were monitored at 210 nm, while adapalene was detected at 321 nm. A key contribution of this work was the optimised gel extraction procedure, which ensured complete recovery of CLN-P from the polymer matrix without degradation of the analyte.30,31

For oral liquid preparations, Ciavarella et al. reported a validated isocratic RP-HPLC assay for clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride (CPH) and its oral solution products. The method met USP Category I validation requirements, demonstrating linearity greater than 0.999 over three consecutive days. Analysis of two commercial CPH products yielded potency estimates greater than 98%, and the approach showed higher chromatographic efficiency and reduced organic solvent consumption compared with the then-current USP compendial procedure.32

Corbett described the development of RP-HPLC methods for a series of therapeutic agents including CLN, providing a methodological template for assay development across structurally diverse lincosamide antibiotics.33

Hyphenated Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Methods

For trace-level determinations in biological and environmental samples, HPLC coupled to mass spectrometry offers substantial advantages in sensitivity and selectivity over UV detection. Two landmark contributions illustrate the capabilities of this approach for CLN.

Yu and colleagues developed an LC-ESI-MS/MS method for CLN in human plasma, validated primarily for bioequivalence applications. The mobile phase comprised 80% acetonitrile containing 0.01% trifluoroacetic acid, with verapamil used as an internal standard. Electrospray ionization with tandem mass spectrometry detection in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode afforded a chromatographic run time of approximately two minutes and a detection limit of 1.3 pg/mL—among the lowest reported for CLN by any technique. The method was applied successfully to plasma samples collected from healthy volunteers over twelve hours following a single 300 mg oral dose.34

Martens-Lobenhoffer and Banditt reported an HPLC-APCI-MS method specifically designed to quantify CLN in both human serum and bone tissue, a clinically important matrix for the management of osteomyelitis and peri-prosthetic joint infections. Lincomycin was employed as the internal standard. Serum samples underwent protein precipitation with acetonitrile alone, while bone tissue required additional mechanical homogenisation. Chromatographic elution used a water–acetonitrile mobile phase (60:40 v/v) containing 0.02% trifluoroacetic acid. The atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source provided robust ionisation across both matrix types, yielding concentrations that correlated well with concurrent microbiological assay data.35

Spectrophotometric Methods

Spectrophotometric methods, while less sensitive than chromatographic approaches, retain an important practical role in pharmaceutical quality control because of their simplicity, low cost, and freedom from complex instrumentation. El-Yazbi and Blaih reported two complementary techniques for CLN hydrochloride determination in capsule and pure-drug form. The spectrophotometric procedure exploited oxidation of the drug's thioether sulfur atom by potassium iodate in acidic medium; the liberated iodine was extracted and quantified photometrically. The titrimetric approach involved direct titration with N-bromosuccinimide to the same oxidative endpoint. Both techniques yielded relative standard deviations below 1%, confirming acceptable precision for routine quality control.36

Recognizing the environmental and occupational hazards associated with organic solvents in conventional spectrophotometry, Affas and Sakur later introduced a validated green, solvent-free kinetic spectrophotometric method for CLN hydrochloride. The procedure exploited the time-dependent colour development of an oxidative reaction, measured at a fixed time point under optimised conditions. Analytical parameters such as temperature, reagent concentration, and reaction time were systematically investigated. Results were in close agreement with those obtained by the reference compendial method, and the approach was applied to both pure drug substance and capsule formulations.37

Electrochemical Methods

Electrochemical techniques offer attractive analytical characteristics for CLN: high sensitivity, low sample volume requirements, and straightforward miniaturisation. The thioether group and tertiary amine of CLN are electrochemically active, providing a basis for both oxidative and reductive detection strategies.

Norouzi and colleagues exploited fast Fourier transform continuous cyclic voltammetry (FFT-CCV) at a gold microelectrode in a flow injection analysis (FIA) system to achieve sub-nanomolar CLN detection. The method required no prior deoxygenation of the sample—a practical advantage over classical polarographic techniques—and achieved a detection limit of 1.3 pg/mL with a quantitation limit of 4 pg/mL. The linear dynamic range was extraordinarily wide, spanning approximately four orders of magnitude (4 to 42,498,400 pg/mL), making the approach applicable both to trace environmental samples and to pharmaceutical formulations without dilution.38

A complementary approach was described by Habib et al., who employed adsorption stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode to determine CLN in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological samples. Carbon paste electrodes are inexpensive, renewable, and easily modified; their large usable potential window and low background current are advantageous for analytes like CLN that require anodic oxidation. The method provided selective and sensitive quantification across the concentration ranges relevant to both quality control and bioanalytical applications.39

Potentiometric determination using ion-selective electrode (ISE) technology represents a further electrochemical option, particularly suited to high-throughput pharmaceutical manufacturing environments where speed and simplicity are paramount. Merey et al. described the development of ISE sensors for CLN, characterising their Nernstian response behaviour and validating selectivity against common excipients and formulation components.40

Capillary Electrophoresis and Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography

Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and related electrokinetic methods have attracted interest as alternatives to HPLC for CLN analysis, especially where minimal sample preparation and rapid analysis are priorities. Flurer and Wolnik demonstrated that chemical profiling by CE could differentiate CLN sourced from different manufacturers and lots—an application of forensic and regulatory significance in verifying drug authenticity and origin.41

Dehouck and colleagues developed and validated a micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) method for CLN using a mixed micellar system. Separation conditions were optimised by central composite experimental design, identifying capillary temperature and surfactant concentration as critical parameters. At the optimised conditions (15°C capillary temperature), the method produced excellent linearity and within-day repeatability. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.05% and 0.15%, respectively, relative to a working concentration of 2.5 mg/mL CLN. Robustness testing confirmed method performance over deliberate small variations in key parameters.42

Chemiluminescence Methods

Chemiluminescence (CL) detection offers exceptional sensitivity and very low background, because it does not depend on an external light source. Shao and co-workers developed a rapid CL method for CLN in capsules based on the drug's inhibitory effect on the myoglobin-catalysed luminol CL reaction. CLN quenches the CL signal in a concentration-dependent manner, and the decrease in CL intensity was linear with the logarithm of CLN concentration. The method had a standard deviation of less than 3.0% (n = 5) and was applied directly to capsule samples with minimal sample preparation.43

Environmental and Multi-Residue Analytical Methods

Detection of CLN in environmental matrices introduces additional challenges: concentrations in surface water are typically in the low ng/L range, matrix complexity is high, and structurally similar analogues (e.g., lincomycin) may co-occur. Seifrtová et al. provided a comprehensive overview of analytical methodologies for antibiotic determination in environmental waters, noting that LC-MS/MS in negative or positive electrospray ionization mode, often with solid-phase extraction (SPE) preconcentration, represents the current gold standard for trace antibiotic monitoring.44

For CLN specifically, the ionization mass spectrometry approaches described above for biological matrices (APCI-MS, ESI-MS/MS) are directly transferable to environmental applications with appropriate preconcentration steps. The high sensitivity of MS/MS detection—routinely achieving sub-nanogram-per-litre quantification limits after SPE—is particularly valuable for surface water monitoring, where CLN concentrations rarely exceed 100 ng/L even in heavily impacted catchments.

Electrospray ionization combined with fast Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI-FTICR-MS) and other high-resolution MS platforms have also been explored for untargeted environmental screening of antibiotic residues, including CLN, in wastewater effluents. These approaches, while not yet routine in regulatory monitoring, hold promise for identifying transformation products and conjugates of CLN that conventional targeted methods would miss.25

 

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF HPLC AND LC-MS METHODS FOR CLINDAMYCIN DETERMINATION

Matrix

Column / Stationary Phase

Mobile Phase

Detection

LOD / LOQ

Reference

Human plasma

RP-C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5 µm)

ACN : 0.02 M Na?HPO? buffer pH 2.9 (29:71 v/v)

UV, 195 nm

80 ng/mL

Vella et al.

Dog blood serum

RP-C18 analytical column

ACN extraction; TBA-HSO? counter-ion

UV

80 ng/mL

Batzias et al.

Vaginal gel

RP-C18

Phosphate buffer : ACN gradient

UV, 210 nm

NR

Stankovic et al.

Topical gel (CLN-P + adapalene)

XBridge C18

Gradient (aqueous buffer : ACN)

UV, 210 nm (CLN-P); 321 nm (adapalene)

NR

Modi & Shah

Oral solution (CPH)

RP-C18, isocratic

Aqueous buffer : organic modifier

UV

Linearity >0.999

Ciavarella et al.

Human serum / bone tissue

RP-C18

Water 60% : ACN 40% + 0.02% TFA

APCI-MS

Sub-µg/g (bone)

Martens-Lobenhoffer et al.

Human plasma (bioequivalence)

RP-C18

80% ACN + 0.01% TFA

ESI-MS/MS (~2 min run)

1.3 pg/mL (LOD)

Yu et al.

ACN = acetonitrile; TFA = trifluoroacetic acid; APCI = atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation; ESI = electrospray ionisation; NR = not reported; CLN-P = clindamycin phosphate; CPH = clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride; LOD = limit of detection

TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF NON-CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHODS FOR CLINDAMYCIN DETERMINATION

Technique

Principle / Reagent

Matrix

Key Performance

Reference

Spectrophotometry (oxidimetric)

KIO?-mediated sulfur oxidation → iodine extraction

Pure drug; capsules

RSD < 1%; linear range validated

El-Yazbi & Blaih

Titrimetry

Direct N-bromosuccinimide titration

Capsules

RSD < 1%

El-Yazbi & Blaih

Kinetic spectrophotometry

Reaction-rate measurement (green, solvent-free)

Pure drug; capsules

Results consistent with reference method

Affas & Sakur

Micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC)

Mixed micellar system; CCD-optimised; 15°C capillary temp.

Pharmaceutical solution (2.5 mg/mL)

LOD 0.05%; LOQ 0.15%; robust

Dehouck et al.

Capillary electrophoresis

Chemical profiling for drug origin

Pharmaceutical products

Selective profiling

Flurer & Wolnik

Chemiluminescence

Myoglobin-luminol CL inhibition assay

Capsules

SD < 3.0% (n=5); linear log[CLN]

Shao et al.

Fast Fourier adsorptive stripping voltammetry (FFASV)

Cyclic voltammetry at Au microelectrode; flow injection

Pure & pharmaceutical samples

LOD 1.3 pg/mL; range 4–42,498,400 pg/mL

Norouzi et al.

Adsorption stripping voltammetry

Carbon paste electrode

Dosage forms; biological samples

Sensitive, selective

Habib et al.

Potentiometry

Ion-selective electrode

Pharmaceutical formulations

Selective response

Merey et al.

CL = chemiluminescence; MEKC = micellar electrokinetic chromatography; CE = capillary electrophoresis; RSD = relative standard deviation; LOD = limit of detection; LOQ = limit of quantification

 

CONCLUSION

The body of analytical literature reviewed here reflects the sustained demand for reliable CLN assays driven by its expanding therapeutic applications and growing environmental footprint. No single technique is universally optimal: the choice depends on the matrix, the concentration range of interest, available instrumentation, and whether the goal is regulatory compliance testing, pharmacokinetic characterisation, or environmental surveillance.

For pharmaceutical quality control of finished dosage forms—tablets, capsules, gels, oral solutions—RP-HPLC with UV detection at 195–210 nm remains the most widely adopted approach, and several validated stability-indicating methods now allow simultaneous quantification of CLN alongside co-formulated actives and preservatives. Where regulatory specificity requirements are stringent, LC-MS/MS or HPLC-APCI-MS provide unambiguous identity confirmation alongside quantification.

For bioanalytical work (pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, drug monitoring in unusual matrices such as bone tissue), mass spectrometric detection is increasingly indispensable, with ESI-MS/MS achieving picogram-per-millilitre sensitivity that far exceeds what UV-based systems can provide. The FFASV-FIA method of Norouzi et al. stands out as a notable exception: its sub-nanomolar detection limit at a gold microelectrode, combined with a linear range spanning more than seven orders of magnitude and negligible deoxygenation requirements, makes it one of the most sensitive electrochemical approaches described for any antibiotic.

For low-cost, routine testing in resource-limited pharmaceutical settings, the kinetic spectrophotometric and titrimetric methods remain viable alternatives, provided that matrix complexity is low and the required sensitivity is in the microgram-per-millilitre range.

Looking forward, several gaps in the CLN analytical literature deserve attention. Environmental monitoring at clinically relevant resistance-selection thresholds (typically sub-µg/L) demands LC-MS/MS with rigorous SPE preconcentration protocols, and method standardisation across laboratories remains poor. The characterisation of CLN transformation products in water and sediment—chlorinated, hydroxylated, and conjugated species—is still largely incomplete, limiting our understanding of the true environmental risk profile of this antibiotic. High-resolution mass spectrometry-based screening platforms are positioned to address these gaps as instrument accessibility increases. Green analytical chemistry principles—minimising organic solvent use, reducing sample volume, and avoiding toxic derivatisation reagents—should be central to the design of next-generation CLN methods, as demonstrated by the solvent-free kinetic spectrophotometric approach already reported for this analyte.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors are grateful to the Department of M.Pharmacy, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Maharashtra, India for providing the institutional support and resources necessary to conduct this review work. No external funding was received for this study.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in connection with the material presented in this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Monteiro SC and Boxall ABA: Occurrence and Fate of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2010; 202:53–154.
  2. Bernhardt ES, Rosi EJ and Gessner MO: Synthetic chemicals as agents of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2017; 15(2):84–90.
  3. Jamur JMS: Analytical Techniques in Pharmaceutical Pollution of the World's Rivers; a Review. ChemChemTech 2024; 67(5):6–16.
  4. Carvalho IT and Santos L: Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario. Environmental International 2016; 94:736–757.
  5. Grenni P, Ancona V and Barra Caracciolo A: Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review. Microchemical Journal 2018; 136:25–39.
  6. Blanco G, Junza A and Barrón D: Occurrence of veterinary pharmaceuticals in golden eagle nestlings: Unnoticed scavenging on livestock carcasses and other potential exposure routes. Science of the Total Environment 2017; 586:355–361.
  7. Ekpeghere KI, Lee JW, Kim HY, Shin SK and Oh JE: Determination and characterization of pharmaceuticals in sludge from municipal and livestock wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2017; 168:1211–1221.
  8. Gros M, Marti E and Balcázar JL et al.: Fate of pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes in a full-scale on-farm livestock waste treatment plant. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2019; 378:120716.
  9. Ramírez-Morales D, Masís-Mora M and Beita-Sandí W et al.: Pharmaceuticals in farms and surrounding surface water bodies: Hazard and ecotoxicity in a swine production area in Costa Rica. Chemosphere 2021; 272:129801.
  10. Shamar JM: Separation and Identification of Naphthalene, Acenaphthylene, Pyrene, Benz{a}Anthracene and 1,3,2,4-Dibenzanthracene. Journal of Al-Nahrain University Science 2009; 12(4):14–24.
  11. Jasim WA, Salman JD and Jamur JMS: Flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry analysis of heavy metals in some food additives available in Baghdad markets, Iraq. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology 2020; 14(2):451–456.
  12. Shamar JM: Determination of some phenols in Tigris River by HPLC. Ibn Al-Haitham Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2013; 26(1):250–258.
  13. Jamur JMS: OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMA-ASSISTED DESORPTION/IONIZATION-MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR ANALYSIS OF IBUPROFEN. ChemChemTech 2023; 89(7):21–24.
  14. Jamur JMS: Raman spectroscopy analysis for monitoring of chemical composition of aspirin after exposure to plasma flame. ChemChemTech 2022; 34(5):18–22.
  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. CLSI Supplement VET08. Pennsylvania: CLSI 2018; M100:282.
  16. Seifrtová M, Nováková L, Lino C, Pena A and Solich P: An overview of analytical methodologies for the determination of antibiotics in environmental waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 2009; 649:158–179.
  17. Gothwal R and Shashidhar T: Antibiotic Pollution in the Environment: A Review. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2015; 43(4):479–489.
  18. Bengtsson-Palme J and Larsson DGJ: Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: Proposed limits for environmental regulation. Environment International 2016; 86:140–149.
  19. González-Pleiter M, Gonzalo S and Rodea-Palomares I et al.: Toxicity of five antibiotics and their mixtures towards photosynthetic aquatic organisms. Water Research 2013; 47(6):2050–2064.
  20. Nadimpalli ML, Marks SJ and Montealegre MC et al.: Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. Nature Microbiology 2020; 5(6):787–795.
  21. Hu Y, Jiang L and Sun X et al.: Risk assessment of antibiotic resistance genes in the drinking water system. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 800:149650.
  22. Amos GCA, Ploumakis S, Zhang L, Hawkey PM, Gaze WH and Wellington EMH: The widespread dissemination of integrons throughout bacterial communities in a riverine system. ISME Journal 2018; 12(3):681–691.
  23. Karkman A, Do TT, Walsh F and Virta MPJ: Antibiotic-Resistance Genes in Waste Water. Trends in Microbiology 2018; 26(3):220–228.
  24. Liu L, Su JQ and Guo Y et al.: Large-scale biogeographical patterns of bacterial antibiotic resistome in the waterbodies of China. Environment International 2018; 117:292–299.
  25. Jasim AA, Jasim WA and Jamur JMS: HPLC Method for the Determination of Some Antibiotic Residues in Different Hospitals Wastewater in Baghdad City, Iraq. ChemChemTech 2024; 67(6):21–28.
  26. Brain RA, Hanson ML, Solomon KR and Brooks BW: Aquatic plants exposed to pharmaceuticals: Effects and risks. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2008; 192:67–115.
  27. Corbett JO: Development and Utilization of Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Methods for a Series of Therapeutic Agents. Modern Chemistry & Applications 2013; 01(02):1–6.
  28. Vella J, Busuttil F and Bartolo NS et al.: A simple HPLC-UV method for the determination of ciprofloxacin in human plasma (method adapted for clindamycin at 195 nm). Journal of Chromatography B 2015; 989:80–85.
  29. Batzias GC, Delis GA and Koutsoviti-Papadopoulou M: A new HPLC/UV method for the determination of clindamycin in dog blood serum. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2004; 35(3):545–554.
  30. Stankovic M, Savic V and Marinkovic V: Determination of clindamycin phosphate in different vaginal gel formulations by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis 2013; 30(2):63–71.
  31. Modi PB and Shah NJ: Novel stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of clindamycin phosphate and adapalene along with preservatives in topical gel formulations. Scientia Pharmaceutica 2014; 82(4):799–813.
  32. Ciavarella AB, Gupta A, Sayeed VA, Khan MA and Faustino PJ: Development and application of a validated HPLC method for the determination of clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride in drug products. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2007; 43(5):1647–1653.
  33. Corbett JO: Development and Utilization of Reversed Phase HPLC Methods for Therapeutic Agents. Modern Chemistry & Applications 2013; 1(2):1–6.
  34. Yu LL, Chao CK and Liao WJ et al.: Determination of clindamycin in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: Application to the bioequivalence study of clindamycin. Journal of Chromatography B 1999; 724(2):287–294.
  35. Martens-Lobenhoffer J and Banditt P: Sensitive and specific determination of clindamycin in human serum and bone tissue applying liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B 2001; 755(1–2):143–149.
  36. El-Yazbi FA and Blaih SM: Spectrophotometric and titrimetric determination of clindamycin hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparations. Analyst 1993; 118(5):577–579.
  37. Affas S and Sakur AA: Validated green spectrophotometric kinetic method for determination of Clindamycin Hydrochloride in capsules. BMC Chemistry 2021; 15(1):1–7.
  38. Norouzi P, Larijani B, Ezoddin M and Ganjali MR: Sub-second adsorption for the fast sub-nanomolar monitoring of Clindamycin in pharmaceutical samples by fast Fourier transformation with continuous cyclic voltammetry at an Au microelectrode. Materials Science and Engineering C 2008; 28(1):87–93.
  39. Habib IHI, Rizk MS and El-Aryan TR: Determination of clindamycin in dosage forms and biological samples by adsorption stripping voltammetry with carbon paste electrode. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 2011; 44(12):705–710.
  40. Merey HA, Tawakkol SM and Sweilam MN: Potentiometric determination of clindamycin. Electrochemistry 2013.
  41. Flurer CL and Wolnik KA: Chemical profiling of pharmaceuticals by capillary electrophoresis in the determination of drug origin. Journal of Chromatography A 1994; 674(1–2):153–163.
  42. Dehouck P, Van Schepdael A, Roets E and Hoogmartens J: Analysis of clindamycin by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with a mixed micellar system. Journal of Chromatography A 2001; 932(1–2):145–152.
  43. Shao X, Xie X, Liu Y and Song Z: Rapid determination of clindamycin in medicine with myoglobin-luminol chemiluminescence system. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2006; 41(2):667–670.
  44. Seifrtová M, Nováková L, Lino C, Pena A and Solich P: An overview of analytical methodologies for the determination of antibiotics in environmental waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 2009; 649:158–179.
  45. Dhangar K and Kumar M: Tricks and tracks in removal of emerging contaminants from the wastewater through hybrid treatment systems: A review. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 738:140320.
  46. Chaturvedi P, Shukla P and Giri BS et al.: Prevalence and hazardous impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products and antibiotics in environment: A review on emerging contaminants. Environmental Research 2021; 194:110664.
  47. González-Pleiter M, Gonzalo S and Rodea-Palomares I et al.: Toxicity of five antibiotics and their mixtures towards photosynthetic aquatic organisms: Implications for environmental risk assessment. Water Research 2013; 47(6):2050–2064.
  48. Nie XP, Liu BY, Yu HJ, Liu WQ and Yang YF: Toxic effects of erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole exposure to the antioxidant system in Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Environmental Pollution 2013; 172:23–32.
  49. Rathi BS, Kumar PS and Show PL: A review on effective removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic systems: Current trends and scope for further research. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021; 409:124413.
  50. Rutten F, Jamur J and Roach P: Fast and versatile ambient surface analysis by plasma-assisted desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy Europe 2015; 27(6):10.

Reference

  1. Monteiro SC and Boxall ABA: Occurrence and Fate of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2010; 202:53–154.
  2. Bernhardt ES, Rosi EJ and Gessner MO: Synthetic chemicals as agents of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2017; 15(2):84–90.
  3. Jamur JMS: Analytical Techniques in Pharmaceutical Pollution of the World's Rivers; a Review. ChemChemTech 2024; 67(5):6–16.
  4. Carvalho IT and Santos L: Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario. Environmental International 2016; 94:736–757.
  5. Grenni P, Ancona V and Barra Caracciolo A: Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review. Microchemical Journal 2018; 136:25–39.
  6. Blanco G, Junza A and Barrón D: Occurrence of veterinary pharmaceuticals in golden eagle nestlings: Unnoticed scavenging on livestock carcasses and other potential exposure routes. Science of the Total Environment 2017; 586:355–361.
  7. Ekpeghere KI, Lee JW, Kim HY, Shin SK and Oh JE: Determination and characterization of pharmaceuticals in sludge from municipal and livestock wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2017; 168:1211–1221.
  8. Gros M, Marti E and Balcázar JL et al.: Fate of pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes in a full-scale on-farm livestock waste treatment plant. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2019; 378:120716.
  9. Ramírez-Morales D, Masís-Mora M and Beita-Sandí W et al.: Pharmaceuticals in farms and surrounding surface water bodies: Hazard and ecotoxicity in a swine production area in Costa Rica. Chemosphere 2021; 272:129801.
  10. Shamar JM: Separation and Identification of Naphthalene, Acenaphthylene, Pyrene, Benz{a}Anthracene and 1,3,2,4-Dibenzanthracene. Journal of Al-Nahrain University Science 2009; 12(4):14–24.
  11. Jasim WA, Salman JD and Jamur JMS: Flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry analysis of heavy metals in some food additives available in Baghdad markets, Iraq. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology 2020; 14(2):451–456.
  12. Shamar JM: Determination of some phenols in Tigris River by HPLC. Ibn Al-Haitham Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2013; 26(1):250–258.
  13. Jamur JMS: OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMA-ASSISTED DESORPTION/IONIZATION-MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR ANALYSIS OF IBUPROFEN. ChemChemTech 2023; 89(7):21–24.
  14. Jamur JMS: Raman spectroscopy analysis for monitoring of chemical composition of aspirin after exposure to plasma flame. ChemChemTech 2022; 34(5):18–22.
  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. CLSI Supplement VET08. Pennsylvania: CLSI 2018; M100:282.
  16. Seifrtová M, Nováková L, Lino C, Pena A and Solich P: An overview of analytical methodologies for the determination of antibiotics in environmental waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 2009; 649:158–179.
  17. Gothwal R and Shashidhar T: Antibiotic Pollution in the Environment: A Review. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 2015; 43(4):479–489.
  18. Bengtsson-Palme J and Larsson DGJ: Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: Proposed limits for environmental regulation. Environment International 2016; 86:140–149.
  19. González-Pleiter M, Gonzalo S and Rodea-Palomares I et al.: Toxicity of five antibiotics and their mixtures towards photosynthetic aquatic organisms. Water Research 2013; 47(6):2050–2064.
  20. Nadimpalli ML, Marks SJ and Montealegre MC et al.: Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. Nature Microbiology 2020; 5(6):787–795.
  21. Hu Y, Jiang L and Sun X et al.: Risk assessment of antibiotic resistance genes in the drinking water system. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 800:149650.
  22. Amos GCA, Ploumakis S, Zhang L, Hawkey PM, Gaze WH and Wellington EMH: The widespread dissemination of integrons throughout bacterial communities in a riverine system. ISME Journal 2018; 12(3):681–691.
  23. Karkman A, Do TT, Walsh F and Virta MPJ: Antibiotic-Resistance Genes in Waste Water. Trends in Microbiology 2018; 26(3):220–228.
  24. Liu L, Su JQ and Guo Y et al.: Large-scale biogeographical patterns of bacterial antibiotic resistome in the waterbodies of China. Environment International 2018; 117:292–299.
  25. Jasim AA, Jasim WA and Jamur JMS: HPLC Method for the Determination of Some Antibiotic Residues in Different Hospitals Wastewater in Baghdad City, Iraq. ChemChemTech 2024; 67(6):21–28.
  26. Brain RA, Hanson ML, Solomon KR and Brooks BW: Aquatic plants exposed to pharmaceuticals: Effects and risks. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2008; 192:67–115.
  27. Corbett JO: Development and Utilization of Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Methods for a Series of Therapeutic Agents. Modern Chemistry & Applications 2013; 01(02):1–6.
  28. Vella J, Busuttil F and Bartolo NS et al.: A simple HPLC-UV method for the determination of ciprofloxacin in human plasma (method adapted for clindamycin at 195 nm). Journal of Chromatography B 2015; 989:80–85.
  29. Batzias GC, Delis GA and Koutsoviti-Papadopoulou M: A new HPLC/UV method for the determination of clindamycin in dog blood serum. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2004; 35(3):545–554.
  30. Stankovic M, Savic V and Marinkovic V: Determination of clindamycin phosphate in different vaginal gel formulations by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis 2013; 30(2):63–71.
  31. Modi PB and Shah NJ: Novel stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of clindamycin phosphate and adapalene along with preservatives in topical gel formulations. Scientia Pharmaceutica 2014; 82(4):799–813.
  32. Ciavarella AB, Gupta A, Sayeed VA, Khan MA and Faustino PJ: Development and application of a validated HPLC method for the determination of clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride in drug products. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2007; 43(5):1647–1653.
  33. Corbett JO: Development and Utilization of Reversed Phase HPLC Methods for Therapeutic Agents. Modern Chemistry & Applications 2013; 1(2):1–6.
  34. Yu LL, Chao CK and Liao WJ et al.: Determination of clindamycin in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: Application to the bioequivalence study of clindamycin. Journal of Chromatography B 1999; 724(2):287–294.
  35. Martens-Lobenhoffer J and Banditt P: Sensitive and specific determination of clindamycin in human serum and bone tissue applying liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B 2001; 755(1–2):143–149.
  36. El-Yazbi FA and Blaih SM: Spectrophotometric and titrimetric determination of clindamycin hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparations. Analyst 1993; 118(5):577–579.
  37. Affas S and Sakur AA: Validated green spectrophotometric kinetic method for determination of Clindamycin Hydrochloride in capsules. BMC Chemistry 2021; 15(1):1–7.
  38. Norouzi P, Larijani B, Ezoddin M and Ganjali MR: Sub-second adsorption for the fast sub-nanomolar monitoring of Clindamycin in pharmaceutical samples by fast Fourier transformation with continuous cyclic voltammetry at an Au microelectrode. Materials Science and Engineering C 2008; 28(1):87–93.
  39. Habib IHI, Rizk MS and El-Aryan TR: Determination of clindamycin in dosage forms and biological samples by adsorption stripping voltammetry with carbon paste electrode. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 2011; 44(12):705–710.
  40. Merey HA, Tawakkol SM and Sweilam MN: Potentiometric determination of clindamycin. Electrochemistry 2013.
  41. Flurer CL and Wolnik KA: Chemical profiling of pharmaceuticals by capillary electrophoresis in the determination of drug origin. Journal of Chromatography A 1994; 674(1–2):153–163.
  42. Dehouck P, Van Schepdael A, Roets E and Hoogmartens J: Analysis of clindamycin by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with a mixed micellar system. Journal of Chromatography A 2001; 932(1–2):145–152.
  43. Shao X, Xie X, Liu Y and Song Z: Rapid determination of clindamycin in medicine with myoglobin-luminol chemiluminescence system. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2006; 41(2):667–670.
  44. Seifrtová M, Nováková L, Lino C, Pena A and Solich P: An overview of analytical methodologies for the determination of antibiotics in environmental waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 2009; 649:158–179.
  45. Dhangar K and Kumar M: Tricks and tracks in removal of emerging contaminants from the wastewater through hybrid treatment systems: A review. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 738:140320.
  46. Chaturvedi P, Shukla P and Giri BS et al.: Prevalence and hazardous impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products and antibiotics in environment: A review on emerging contaminants. Environmental Research 2021; 194:110664.
  47. González-Pleiter M, Gonzalo S and Rodea-Palomares I et al.: Toxicity of five antibiotics and their mixtures towards photosynthetic aquatic organisms: Implications for environmental risk assessment. Water Research 2013; 47(6):2050–2064.
  48. Nie XP, Liu BY, Yu HJ, Liu WQ and Yang YF: Toxic effects of erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole exposure to the antioxidant system in Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Environmental Pollution 2013; 172:23–32.
  49. Rathi BS, Kumar PS and Show PL: A review on effective removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic systems: Current trends and scope for further research. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021; 409:124413.
  50. Rutten F, Jamur J and Roach P: Fast and versatile ambient surface analysis by plasma-assisted desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy Europe 2015; 27(6):10.

Photo
Abhijit Jankar
Corresponding author

Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, 402103, India

Photo
Ashish Jadhav
Co-author

Shree Saraswati Institute of Pharmacy, Tondavali

Photo
Lakshak Joshi
Co-author

Shree Saraswati Institute of Pharmacy, Tondavali

Photo
Manthan Sutar
Co-author

Shree Saraswati Institute of Pharmacy, Tondavali

Abhijit Jankar, Lakshak Joshi, Manthan Sutar, Ashish Jadhav, A Review of Analytical Methods for the Determination of Clindamycin in Pharmaceutical Products and Environmental Samples, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 7640-7651, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20426154

More related articles
Recent Advances in Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Foods ...
Shital Mante, Poonam Sable, Shrikrushna Manwatkar, Rushikesh Malk...
Oral Thin Films: Emerging Trends in Drug Delivery ...
Nirmala E, Surya S , Vigneshwaran S , Umadevi V , Swarnamanjari...
Artificial Intelligence in Modern Drug Discovery a...
Saurabh Kumar Dudhera, Anurag Chaurasia, Shaily Tyagi, Dr. Mudita...
Review On Nanoparticle ...
Navpute Akash , Manas Nikam, Neha pandit , Rupali pathre, Monika madibone ...
Development And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-acne Gel Formulation...
Vedant Chimote , Dr.Sandeep Atram , Unnati Nathe , Vidya Karhale ...
Related Articles
AI and Machine Learning in Drug Discovery and Development:A Comprehensive Analys...
Arti Rana, Nitin Kumar, Abhishek Sharma, Simran, Kamlesh Rani, Prachi, Aditya Verma...
Flavored Oral Dispersible Films: A Comprehensive Review of Formulation Approache...
Dr. Pradeep H K, Prashanth K U, Nishmitha, Siddartha B S, Gururaj...
Evaluation Tests for Tablets and Capsules: A Review of Solid Oral Dosage Forms...
Manas Nikam, Akash Navpute, Neha Pandit, Rupali Pathre, Monika Madibone...
Nafithromycin: India’s First Indigenously Developed Ketolide Antibiotic for Dr...
K. H. Makhija, N. R. Pathan, P. S. Jadhav, N. S. Jadhav...
Recent Advances in Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Foods (Rutf) For the Management of S...
Shital Mante, Poonam Sable, Shrikrushna Manwatkar, Rushikesh Malkar, Rutuja Mahindrakar, Pankaj Magh...
More related articles
Recent Advances in Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Foods (Rutf) For the Management of S...
Shital Mante, Poonam Sable, Shrikrushna Manwatkar, Rushikesh Malkar, Rutuja Mahindrakar, Pankaj Magh...
Oral Thin Films: Emerging Trends in Drug Delivery Technology...
Nirmala E, Surya S , Vigneshwaran S , Umadevi V , Swarnamanjari M, Vishvaja G ...
Artificial Intelligence in Modern Drug Discovery and Pharmacology: Revolutionizi...
Saurabh Kumar Dudhera, Anurag Chaurasia, Shaily Tyagi, Dr. Mudita Mishra, Dr. Santosh Kumar Verma...
Recent Advances in Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Foods (Rutf) For the Management of S...
Shital Mante, Poonam Sable, Shrikrushna Manwatkar, Rushikesh Malkar, Rutuja Mahindrakar, Pankaj Magh...
Oral Thin Films: Emerging Trends in Drug Delivery Technology...
Nirmala E, Surya S , Vigneshwaran S , Umadevi V , Swarnamanjari M, Vishvaja G ...
Artificial Intelligence in Modern Drug Discovery and Pharmacology: Revolutionizi...
Saurabh Kumar Dudhera, Anurag Chaurasia, Shaily Tyagi, Dr. Mudita Mishra, Dr. Santosh Kumar Verma...