We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra
A crucial stage in the worldwide drug development process is the acceptance of Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for chemotherapeutic agents, which guarantees the quality, safety, and effectiveness of cancer treatments prior to human clinical trials. The United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) have established structured frameworks for IND approval; however, there are notable variations in the regulatory pathways, documentation requirements, and review timelines. The New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, which govern IND applications in India, mandate the submission of preclinical data, clinical trial protocols, and manufacturing information. Subject Expert Committees and regulatory agencies then evaluate the applications. ([CDSCO]) The USFDA, on the other hand, requires IND filing before clinical trials, with a specific review time prior to trial beginning and a focus on comprehensive pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical study protocols. ([PMC]) In order to ensure uniform evaluation among EU member states, the EMA uses a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) system under a centralized or decentralized method.
1.1 Anticancer Agents 1
Anticancer medications, often referred to as antineoplastic operators, are used to treat cancer by either preventing the growth of cancer cells or directing their death. Malignancies are treated using anticancer medications. Medication can be used either on its own or in conjunction with other medications, such as radiation therapy or surgery. Anticancer medications kill cancer cells by first arranging energy, which implies lower concentration. Anti-cancer medications are used to kill all malignant cells because they are the only ones capable of causing cancer.
Bladder cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, non-hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, oral and oropharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, and uterine cancer are among the several forms of cancer.Treatment for cancer varies depending on the type and stage of the disease. Most patients receive a combination of treatments, some of which are "local" treatments like radiation therapy or surgery that are designed to treat a particular tumor. Because they impact the entire body, systemic treatments including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc.
Surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, bone marrow or steam cell transplantation, photodynamic therapy, and hyperthermia are some of the cancer treatment options.Radiation therapy uses high energy particles or radiation such as x - ray gamma rays electron beams or protons todestroy or kill cancer cell it is one of the most widely used cancer treatment. Chemotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses drug to kill cancer cells or slow their growth, it is a systemictreatment, meaning it affects the entire body and is often used in combination with other treatment like surgery,
radiation therapy or immunotherapy and chemotherapy is also called as “chemo”.
2. Classification of Anticancer Drugs 2
2.1 Alkylating Agents
By forming an azindinium ion connection with the nitrogen atom at the seventh position in the guanine of DNA, these drugs directly damage or disrupt the DNA of cancer cells. These drugs are effective against multiple myeloma, breast cancer, Hodgkin's disease, and lymphomas. Mechlorethamine, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, thiotepa, and cisplatin are a few examples.
2.2 Antimetabolites
These are a class of anticancer medications that disrupt the synthesis of DNA and RNA. They are integrated into DNA or RNA and resemble the typical substrates of cellular metabolism, which disrupts cell development and division.
2.3 Natural Product
The discovery of anti-cancer medications has been greatly aided by natural products; many of the chemotherapeutic medicines in use today come from plants, microorganisms, and marine species.
2.4 Antitumor antibiotics
Antitumor antibiotics are a class of anticancer drugs that interfere with DNA function and structure. Unlike traditional antibiotics that fight bacterial infections, these drugs are used specifically to treat cancer. They are derived from natural products produced by soil microorganisms, primarily from the genus Streptomyces. Their main mechanism of action involves damaging DNA and inhibiting essential cellular processes like replication and transcription, leading to cell de. Examples are: Anthracyclines, Bleomycine, Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin.
2.5 Hormonal Agents
A family of anticancer medications known as hormonal agents targets hormone-sensitive tumors. These drugs are most frequently used to treat hormone-dependent malignancies, such as prostate and breast cancer. The basic idea underlying hormonal treatments is to either lower certain hormone levels or prevent them from having an impact on cancer cells.
2.6 Miscellaneous
Examples are Hydroxyurea, L-Asparginase, Arsenic trioxide. Mechanism of action: By inhibiting ribonucleoside diphosphate reducase, hydroxyurea prevents RBC from being converted to DNA, which stops DNA production. Asparaginase breaks down asparagine, an amino acid that some cancer cells are unable to produce on their own and must obtain from outside sources. It starves these cells by depleting asparagine, which causes them to die.
2.7 Signal transduction inhibitors
A class of anticancer medications known as signal transduction inhibitors disrupts the processes that regulate the development, survival, and spread of cancer cells. Dysregulated signaling pathways in cancer cells frequently result in unchecked cell proliferation. In order to interfere with the operation of cancer cells, signal transduction inhibitors target certain molecules within these pathways. Another name for these is Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).
Figure 1. Classification Of Anticancer Drugs 2
3. Methodology
3.1 Cancer trials ecosystem in India 3-12
One of the main causes of sickness and death worldwide is cancer. In 2022, there were about 1.46 million new cases of cancer in India, with the most common forms occurring in the stomach, breast, lung, and oral cavity. In 2016, cancer accounted for 5% of all disability-adjusted life years and 8.3% of all deaths in India. Five factors—increasing average life expectancy, sedentary lifestyle, food, tobacco use, obesity, metabolic illnesses, and pollution—are responsible for the rising absolute incidence of cancer in India. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for cancer patients are trending upward worldwide due to advancements in surgical methods, precision radiation, new targeted treatments, and immunotherapies.
Clinical trials must be well planned in order for new anticancer treatments to be developed and approved. Sponsors are increasingly searching for patients from other regions, particularly India, due to the sheer volume of candidate compounds and the competitive environment in the developed countries. Approximately one-fifth of all cancer sufferers reside in India, which is home to 17% of the world's population. However, the percentage of ongoing international clinical trials in India is less than 2%. When the pharmaceutical business thinks about using Indian sites for international clinical trials, they have encountered regulatory obstacles, particularly in the last ten years, such as less-than-ideal review and approval periods. It is gratifying to see that the Indian government significantly changed clinical research regulations under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, bringing them closer to international standards. The authors of this review first give a brief overview of how India's clinical trial landscape has changed over the past few decades before concentrating on the most recent modifications to the regulatory framework, with a particular focus on cancer trials.
Figure 2: Number of clinical trials registered on the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) website. 13
3.2 Estabilishing India as Research Hub for Oncology
Clinical research for cancer medications in India encounters a number of difficulties and obstacles in addition to regulatory requirements; some of the most significant ones are outlined here.
3.3 Barriers to Oncology Clinical Research
3.3.1 Lack of Awareness for Research in Cancer Care 14-17
Providing patients with regular and timely therapy is the top goal for oncologists and cancer clinics. Clinical research is therefore frequently deprioritized due to India's enormous patient burden. Furthermore, the time-consuming and resource-intensive procedures needed to perform clinical trials impede the advancement of clinical research. Another challenge is the absence of well-established academic research networks around the nation.
Any nation's national cancer data registries provide a strong foundation for carrying out clinical research. Research capacity will be increased nationwide with the establishment of the National Cancer Grid (NCG) and the six new Tata Cancer Centers that are planned.
3.3.2 Poor Support for Clinical Trials As a Care Option
Only a small number of patients are referred inside the same or neighboring institutions; the majority of patients participating in cancer clinical trials come from the investigator's own database. In order to give patients the chance to access clinical trials as one of the possible treatment options, oncologists must be aware of the availability of clinical trials in a certain condition and be willing to send patients to the site.
3.3.3. Lack of Oncology Medical Professionals and Facilities 15-19
The oncologist-to-patient ratio in India is rather low; in 2021, it was approximately 1:2000. Oncologists in India see about 475 new patients annually on average (median of 35 patients each outpatient clinic), which is significantly more than in high-income nations. In addition, there is a lack of paramedical personnel with expertise in the therapeutic field of oncology. While the majority of India's major cities have created medical facilities, semiurban and rural areas lack the necessary infrastructure for establishing hospital genetic testing labs and clinical research sections. Biosamples from patients must be sent to central laboratories in certain centers. Another obstacle to clinical research is the logistical challenge of transporting viable patient material.
3.3.4 Insufficient Resources for Clinical Research 11, 19-20
India is a large market for the pharmaceutical industry, but because the majority of drug development in pharmaceutical companies is concentrated in the US and/or Europe, there is little money set aside for clinical research in India. However, the situation is shifting as a result of recent developments and reforms. Clinical research is funded by government or commercial organizations, as well as pharmaceutical and biotech sponsors. According to a recent study, government-funded interventional trials are only available in six states in India, where there is a significant gap in the number of trials and financing received for industry-sponsored trials versus academic studies. The Indian Department of Biotechnology is currently giving institutions and individual researchers more cash and resources to carry out basic, practical, and translational oncology research.
3.3.5 Economic Aspect 21, 22, 23
The sponsor pays the majority of the medical and related expenses incurred during clinical studies. However, it is necessary to take into account a number of non-medical substantial out-of-pocket expenses—social determinants of health—such as travel and the loss of employment for oneself and caregiver (if necessary). Due to rising medicine and cancer care costs, one of the largest obstacles to post-trial drug access is still financial. Data gathered from the ongoing study on the cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life of anti-cancer medications will be used to assess the direct and indirect costs of cancer care in India. . Access to the post-trial market for the approved medication is a significant financial obstacle for sponsors. The majority of cancer patients in India are frequently unable to afford novel therapies due to the country's insufficient insurance coverage, which means that people bear the majority of health care costs.
3.3.6 Geographical, Cultural, and Social Factors 20, 24-29
India is a multilingual and multicultural nation. Early cancer screening and detection may be hampered by cultural barriers. Female gynecologic cancer diagnostic delays are mostly caused by cultural and societal hurdles, such as humiliation and a lack of family support. As a result, many individuals are unable to receive cancer treatment at an early stage. Additionally, patients with cancer have a high chance of being lost to follow-up, which has a significant impact on the availability of survival statistics. There are difficulties in upholding uniformity of informed consent because different languages and dialects are prevalent throughout India. India is a multilingual and multicultural nation. Early cancer screening and detection may be hampered by cultural barriers. Female gynecologic cancer diagnostic delays are mostly caused by cultural and societal hurdles, such as humiliation and a lack of family support. As a result, many individuals are unable to receive cancer treatment at an early stage. Additionally, patients with cancer have a high chance of being lost to follow-up, which has a significant impact on the availability of survival statistics. There are difficulties in upholding uniformity of informed consent because different languages and dialects are prevalent throughout India. Less than 10% of patients with newly diagnosed cancer in India have access to a therapeutic cancer clinical trial, indicating significant geographic variation in cancer clinical trial availability. Even for common cancer forms like breast cancer, a significant interstate discrepancy in access to interventional trials was noted in a study measuring geographic disparities in cancer clinical research in India. It was found that the median sample size per year per state (SSY) was 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases. When cancer site-wise SSY was taken into account, disparities were even more pronounced. Only 29.7% of newly diagnosed cancer patients have a spot available in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial, even in the state with the greatest SSY.
3.4. Investigational New Drugs (IND) and Its Importance 30-32
A novel chemical or biological substance that has not been authorized for widespread use and is being assessed for quality, safety, and efficacy in human subjects is known as an Investigational New Drug (IND). Between preclinical research and clinical trials, the IND procedure acts as a scientific and legal link. The sponsor must submit a thorough IND dossier to the CDSCO in order to receive clearance before beginning any human trials. Typically, an IND dossier includes:
The purpose of IND review is to guarantee that ethical and scientific standards are upheld and that prospective clinical studies do not subject human participants to unjustifiable risks. The IND permits the sponsor to lawfully start Phase I–III clinical trials in India after it has been approved.
Figure 3: Contents of an Investigational New Drug (IND) Application. 33
Table 1: Regulatory Framework of Investigational New Drugs Application for Chemotherapeutic in India vs. USA vs. EMA 34-55
|
Parameter |
India (CDSCO / NDCTR 2019) |
United States (USFDA / 21 CFR Part 312) |
Europe (EMA / EU CTR 536/2014) |
|
Regulatory Authority |
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), and Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). |
CDER (for chemotherapeutics) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). |
National Competent Authorities (NCAs) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) via CTIS. |
|
Legal Basis / Regulation |
The Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940's New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019. |
21 CFR Part 312; Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). |
EU Clinical Trials Regulation No. 536/2014. |
|
Type of Application |
Clinical Trial Application (Form CT-04/CT-18) and Investigational New Drug (IND). |
Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND). |
Clinical Trial Application (CTA) using the CTIS Portal. |
|
Submission Portal |
SUGAM Portal (CDSCO online). |
FDA Electronic Submissions Gateway for Electronic Common Technical Documents (eCTD). |
A unified EU portal called the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS). |
|
Key Documents Required |
Preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, CMC data, protocol, investigator's brochure, ethics committee approval, informed consent, and stability data. |
Nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology, CMC, Clinical protocol, Investigator’s Brochure, pharmacology of cancer drugs, Safety monitoring plan. |
IMPD (Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier), nonclinical, CMC, clinical protocol, investigator's brochure, and Part I and II documents. |
|
Ethics Approval |
Mandatory approval by registered Ethics Committee (EC). |
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required. |
Part II of the application is evaluated by National Ethics Committees. |
|
Timeline for Approval |
Depending on the country of origin (imported or domestic), 30 to 90 days. Deemed approval if no objection within timeline. |
30 days following the submission of the IND, unless it is put on clinical hold. |
Part I assessment takes 45 days, and national Part II takes about 60 days. |
|
Chemotherapeutic Specific Guidance |
Follows Schedule Y & NDCTR 2019 oncology trial guidance. Oncology trials require prior preclinical tumor models & dose escalation justification . |
Follows FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) recommendations — incorporates dose-finding, combination studies, biomarker-based designs. |
complies with the EMA Oncology Guideline (EMA/CHMP/205/95 Rev.5) for anticancer pharmaceuticals . |
|
Clinical Trial Phases |
Phases I–IV in accordance with NDCTR; each phase requires municipal permission. |
Adaptive and basket trials were permitted for oncology in phases 0–IV. |
Phase I–IV: adaptive and biomarker-driven trials are possible with centralized coordination using CTIS. |
|
Safety Reporting |
Periodic DSURs to CDSCO & EC; SAE/SUSAR must be notified within 14 calendar days. |
Annual reporting to the FDA; expedited IND safety reports within 7 or 15 days. |
SUSAR reporting via EudraVigilance; yearly safety reports (DSUR). |
|
Compensation / Ethics |
Compensation for injuries or deaths due to the trial is required; the sponsor and investigator share responsibility. |
Payment in accordance with local IRB regulations; insurance coverage is typically necessary. |
Insurance and participant protection are required; the sponsor is responsible. |
|
Transparency / Registration |
Prior to enrollment, registration in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) |
ClinicalTrials.gov registration is necessary (under FDAAA 801). |
Public disclosure and registration using the CTIS database. |
|
Inspections & Compliance |
GCP compliance site inspections are carried out by CDSCO and DCGI. |
Under GCP, the FDA does both routine and for-cause inspections. |
Under GCP, EMA and NCAs work together to conduct inspections. |
|
Expedited / Early Access Pathways |
expedited clearance for orphan cancer medications and unmet medical requirements. |
Priority Review, Accelerated Approval, Fast Track, and Breakthrough Therapy. |
Conditional Marketing Authorization and the PRIME (PRIority Medicines) Program. |
|
Post-Trial Access (PTA) |
NDCTR-mandated provisions for patients, particularly those with life-threatening conditions like cancer. |
IRB supervision; post-trial access at sponsor discretion. |
mandated by national legislation and necessary for unmet medical needs. |
|
Public Disclosure |
restricted (through CTRI). |
According to ClinicalTrials.gov, moderate. |
High (complete trial data publishing via CTIS). |
|
Regulatory Review Focus |
Safety, efficacy, quality, compensation, and ethical protection. |
Safety, pharmacokinetics, early effectiveness signs, and long-term toxicity. |
harmonization throughout the EU, scientific validity, and ethical acceptability. |
Table 2: Investigational New Drugs Application Approval Pathway for Chemotherapeutic In India vs. USA vs. EMA 56-62
|
Stage |
India (CDSCO / DCGI) |
USA (USFDA) |
Europe (EMA) |
|
Regulatory Authority |
The Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) oversees the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), Directorate General of Health Services. |
The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), or the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) |
National Competent Authorities (NCAs) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ) |
|
Legal Framework |
New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules (NDCTR), 2019; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 & Rules, 1945 |
21 CFR Part 312; Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) |
Directive 2001/83/EC; EU Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 |
|
Application Type |
Application for IND (Form CT-04) |
Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND) (Form FDA 1571) |
Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS)-based Clinical Trial Application (CTA) |
|
Preclinical Data Requirements |
ICH M3(R2) data on pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, acute and chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity; GLP-compliant data |
Studies on pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, reproduction, and carcinogenicity in accordance with FDA GLP guidelines |
ICH M3(R2) and OECD GLP guidelines for nonclinical research; CTD Module 4 |
|
Ethics Approval |
CDSCO-registered Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) |
Institutional Review Board (IRB) |
Committees on Ethics in Every Member State |
|
Submission Format |
CTD, or Common Technical Document |
eCTD format (Electronic CTD) |
eCTD format with Module 1 tailored to the EU |
|
Regulatory Review |
Subject Expert Committee (SEC) → Technical Committee → Apex Committee (if applicable) → DCGI conclusion |
Review by the relevant therapeutic division of the FDA |
EMA or NCA evaluation, based on national or centralized protocol |
|
Timeline for IND/CTA Authorization |
30–90 days (after approval, Form CT-06 is issued) |
30 days (if there are flaws, the FDA may place a clinical hold). |
60 days (for sophisticated therapy, this could go up to 90 days) |
|
Clinical Trial Phases |
Phase I: Safety of people |
Phase I: security |
Phase I: safety and dosage |
|
Phase II: effectiveness |
Phase II: effectiveness |
Phase II: effectiveness |
|
|
Phase III: Comparative analysis |
Phase III: Verification |
Phase III: multicentric pivotal |
|
|
Phase IV: Post Marketing |
Phase IV: Post Marketing |
Phase IV: Pharmacovigilance |
|
|
Trial Registration |
India's Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI) |
ClinicalTrials.gov |
Register of EU Clinical Trials |
|
Chemotherapy-Specific Guidelines |
Schedule Y; NDCTR 2019; CDSCO guidelines for cancer research |
FDA Oncology Drug Development Guidelines (updated in 2023) |
The 2017 EMA Guideline on the Assessment of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Humans |
|
Decision Authority |
DCGI following the SEC's suggestion |
FDA following IND/NDA evaluation |
EMA (European Commission authorization → CHMP opinion) |
|
Post-Approval Surveillance |
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) and Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) |
Post-market monitoring, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) (21 CFR 314.80) |
Risk Management Plan (RMP) and Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) |
|
Approximate Overall Timeline |
IND to Marketing: 1.5–3 years |
IND to NDA: two to four years |
CTA to MAA: three to five years |
|
Harmonization Guidelines |
Schedule Y, NDCTR 2019, ICH-GCP |
21 CFR 50, 56, 312, ICH-GCP |
EU Regulation 536/2014, ICH-GCP, and EMA oncology guidelines |
3.5. Challenges in the IND Approval Process 63-67
Chemotherapeutic medication IND/CTA approval is fraught with difficulties in India, the USA, and the EMA. With problems like inadequate pharmacovigilance systems, inconsistent GLP/GCP compliance, delayed reviews, and a lack of infrastructure for cancer trials, India's regulatory harmonization under the NDCTR 2019 is still in progress. Despite having a strong FDA, the USA has difficulties because of the high expense and complexity of cancer trials, strict eligibility and ethical requirements, and the need to adjust to quickly changing treatments like gene therapy and immuno-oncology. The decentralized EMA-Member State arrangement in Europe results in lengthy review periods, complicated procedures, and challenges in coordinating data protection and ethics under GDPR. Patient recruitment, trial transparency, financial constraints, and the incorporation of empirical data continue to be major challenges in every country. Chemotherapeutic experimental drug approval is hampered by disparities in documentation, schedules, and infrastructure, even with good ICH-GCP alignment worldwide.
CONCLUSION
Despite differences in regulatory structure, timeliness, and procedural requirements, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency all share a commitment to guaranteeing the safety, efficacy, and quality of oncology drugs through the approval process of Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for chemotherapeutic agents.
REFERENCES
Bhagwat Deshmukh, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Suryakant Jadhav, Somesh Kale, Swapnil Kulkarni, Nikita Delmade, Mayuri Janakwade, Pratiksha Shinde, Approval Process of Investigational New Drugs Application for Chemotherapeutics Drugs in INDIA (CDSCO) Comparison with USA (USFDA) & EUROPE (EMA), Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19983176
10.5281/zenodo.19983176