View Article

Abstract

A crucial stage in the worldwide drug development process is the acceptance of Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for chemotherapeutic agents, which guarantees the quality, safety, and effectiveness of cancer treatments prior to human clinical trials. The United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) have established structured frameworks for IND approval; however, there are notable variations in the regulatory pathways, documentation requirements, and review timelines. The New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, which govern IND applications in India, mandate the submission of preclinical data, clinical trial protocols, and manufacturing information. Subject Expert Committees and regulatory agencies then evaluate the applications. ([CDSCO]) The USFDA, on the other hand, requires IND filing before clinical trials, with a specific review time prior to trial beginning and a focus on comprehensive pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical study protocols. ([PMC]) In order to ensure uniform evaluation among EU member states, the EMA uses a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) system under a centralized or decentralized method.

Keywords

Investigational New Drug (IND), Chemotherapeutic Drugs, CDSCO,USFDA, EMA Regulatory Affairs, Clinical Trial Approval, Drug Development, Oncology Drug Regulation, Comparative Regulatory Framework, New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019.

Introduction

× Popup Image

1.1 Anticancer Agents 1

Anticancer medications, often referred to as antineoplastic operators, are used to treat cancer by either preventing the growth of cancer cells or directing their death. Malignancies are treated using anticancer medications. Medication can be used either on its own or in conjunction with other medications, such as radiation therapy or surgery. Anticancer medications kill cancer cells by first arranging energy, which implies lower concentration. Anti-cancer medications are used to kill all malignant cells because they are the only ones capable of causing cancer.

Bladder cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, non-hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, oral and oropharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, and uterine cancer are among the several forms of cancer.Treatment for cancer varies depending on the type and stage of the disease. Most patients receive a combination of treatments, some of which are "local" treatments like radiation therapy or surgery that are designed to treat a particular tumor. Because they impact the entire body, systemic treatments including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc.

Surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, bone marrow or steam cell transplantation, photodynamic therapy, and hyperthermia are some of the cancer treatment options.Radiation therapy uses high energy particles or radiation such as x - ray gamma rays electron beams or protons todestroy or kill cancer cell it is one of the most widely used cancer treatment. Chemotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses drug to kill cancer cells or slow their growth, it is a systemictreatment, meaning it affects the entire body and is often used in combination with other treatment like surgery,
radiation therapy or immunotherapy and chemotherapy is also called as “chemo”.

2. Classification of Anticancer Drugs 2

2.1 Alkylating Agents

By forming an azindinium ion connection with the nitrogen atom at the seventh position in the guanine of DNA, these drugs directly damage or disrupt the DNA of cancer cells. These drugs are effective against multiple myeloma, breast cancer, Hodgkin's disease, and lymphomas. Mechlorethamine, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, thiotepa, and cisplatin are a few examples.

2.2 Antimetabolites

These are a class of anticancer medications that disrupt the synthesis of DNA and RNA. They are integrated into DNA or RNA and resemble the typical substrates of cellular metabolism, which disrupts cell development and division.

2.3 Natural Product

The discovery of anti-cancer medications has been greatly aided by natural products; many of the chemotherapeutic medicines in use today come from plants, microorganisms, and marine species.

2.4 Antitumor antibiotics

Antitumor antibiotics are a class of anticancer drugs that interfere with DNA function and structure. Unlike traditional antibiotics that fight bacterial infections, these drugs are used specifically to treat cancer. They are derived from natural products produced by soil microorganisms, primarily from the genus Streptomyces. Their main mechanism of action involves damaging DNA and inhibiting essential cellular processes like replication and transcription, leading to cell de. Examples are: Anthracyclines, Bleomycine, Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin.

2.5 Hormonal Agents

A family of anticancer medications known as hormonal agents targets hormone-sensitive tumors. These drugs are most frequently used to treat hormone-dependent malignancies, such as prostate and breast cancer. The basic idea underlying hormonal treatments is to either lower certain hormone levels or prevent them from having an impact on cancer cells.

2.6 Miscellaneous

Examples are Hydroxyurea, L-Asparginase, Arsenic trioxide. Mechanism of action: By inhibiting ribonucleoside diphosphate reducase, hydroxyurea prevents RBC from being converted to DNA, which stops DNA production. Asparaginase breaks down asparagine, an amino acid that some cancer cells are unable to produce on their own and must obtain from outside sources. It starves these cells by depleting asparagine, which causes them to die.

2.7 Signal transduction inhibitors

A class of anticancer medications known as signal transduction inhibitors disrupts the processes that regulate the development, survival, and spread of cancer cells. Dysregulated signaling pathways in cancer cells frequently result in unchecked cell proliferation. In order to interfere with the operation of cancer cells, signal transduction inhibitors target certain molecules within these pathways. Another name for these is Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).

Figure 1. Classification Of Anticancer Drugs 2

3. Methodology

3.1 Cancer trials ecosystem in India 3-12

One of the main causes of sickness and death worldwide is cancer. In 2022, there were about 1.46 million new cases of cancer in India, with the most common forms occurring in the stomach, breast, lung, and oral cavity. In 2016, cancer accounted for 5% of all disability-adjusted life years and 8.3% of all deaths in India. Five factors—increasing average life expectancy, sedentary lifestyle, food, tobacco use, obesity, metabolic illnesses, and pollution—are responsible for the rising absolute incidence of cancer in India. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for cancer patients are trending upward worldwide due to advancements in surgical methods, precision radiation, new targeted treatments, and immunotherapies.

Clinical trials must be well planned in order for new anticancer treatments to be developed and approved. Sponsors are increasingly searching for patients from other regions, particularly India, due to the sheer volume of candidate compounds and the competitive environment in the developed countries. Approximately one-fifth of all cancer sufferers reside in India, which is home to 17% of the world's population. However, the percentage of ongoing international clinical trials in India is less than 2%. When the pharmaceutical business thinks about using Indian sites for international clinical trials, they have encountered regulatory obstacles, particularly in the last ten years, such as less-than-ideal review and approval periods. It is gratifying to see that the Indian government significantly changed clinical research regulations under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, bringing them closer to international standards. The authors of this review first give a brief overview of how India's clinical trial landscape has changed over the past few decades before concentrating on the most recent modifications to the regulatory framework, with a particular focus on cancer trials.

Figure 2: Number of clinical trials registered on the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) website. 13

3.2 Estabilishing India as Research Hub for Oncology

Clinical research for cancer medications in India encounters a number of difficulties and obstacles in addition to regulatory requirements; some of the most significant ones are outlined here.

3.3 Barriers to Oncology Clinical Research

3.3.1 Lack of Awareness for Research in Cancer Care 14-17

Providing patients with regular and timely therapy is the top goal for oncologists and cancer clinics. Clinical research is therefore frequently deprioritized due to India's enormous patient burden. Furthermore, the time-consuming and resource-intensive procedures needed to perform clinical trials impede the advancement of clinical research. Another challenge is the absence of well-established academic research networks around the nation.

Any nation's national cancer data registries provide a strong foundation for carrying out clinical research. Research capacity will be increased nationwide with the establishment of the National Cancer Grid (NCG) and the six new Tata Cancer Centers that are planned.

3.3.2 Poor Support for Clinical Trials As a Care Option

Only a small number of patients are referred inside the same or neighboring institutions; the majority of patients participating in cancer clinical trials come from the investigator's own database. In order to give patients the chance to access clinical trials as one of the possible treatment options, oncologists must be aware of the availability of clinical trials in a certain condition and be willing to send patients to the site.

3.3.3. Lack of Oncology Medical Professionals and Facilities 15-19

The oncologist-to-patient ratio in India is rather low; in 2021, it was approximately 1:2000. Oncologists in India see about 475 new patients annually on average (median of 35 patients each outpatient clinic), which is significantly more than in high-income nations. In addition, there is a lack of paramedical personnel with expertise in the therapeutic field of oncology. While the majority of India's major cities have created medical facilities, semiurban and rural areas lack the necessary infrastructure for establishing hospital genetic testing labs and clinical research sections. Biosamples from patients must be sent to central laboratories in certain centers. Another obstacle to clinical research is the logistical challenge of transporting viable patient material.

3.3.4 Insufficient Resources for Clinical Research 11, 19-20

India is a large market for the pharmaceutical industry, but because the majority of drug development in pharmaceutical companies is concentrated in the US and/or Europe, there is little money set aside for clinical research in India. However, the situation is shifting as a result of recent developments and reforms. Clinical research is funded by government or commercial organizations, as well as pharmaceutical and biotech sponsors. According to a recent study, government-funded interventional trials are only available in six states in India, where there is a significant gap in the number of trials and financing received for industry-sponsored trials versus academic studies. The Indian Department of Biotechnology is currently giving institutions and individual researchers more cash and resources to carry out basic, practical, and translational oncology research.

3.3.5 Economic Aspect 21, 22, 23

The sponsor pays the majority of the medical and related expenses incurred during clinical studies. However, it is necessary to take into account a number of non-medical substantial out-of-pocket expenses—social determinants of health—such as travel and the loss of employment for oneself and caregiver (if necessary). Due to rising medicine and cancer care costs, one of the largest obstacles to post-trial drug access is still financial. Data gathered from the ongoing study on the cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life of  anti-cancer medications will be used to assess the direct and indirect costs of cancer care in India. . Access to the post-trial market for the approved medication is a significant financial obstacle for sponsors. The majority of cancer patients in India are frequently unable to afford novel therapies due to the country's insufficient insurance coverage, which means that people bear the majority of health care costs.

3.3.6 Geographical, Cultural, and Social Factors 20, 24-29

India is a multilingual and multicultural nation. Early cancer screening and detection may be hampered by cultural barriers. Female gynecologic cancer diagnostic delays are mostly caused by cultural and societal hurdles, such as humiliation and a lack of family support. As a result, many individuals are unable to receive cancer treatment at an early stage. Additionally, patients with cancer have a high chance of being lost to follow-up, which has a significant impact on the availability of survival statistics. There are difficulties in upholding uniformity of informed consent because different languages and dialects are prevalent throughout India. India is a multilingual and multicultural nation. Early cancer screening and detection may be hampered by cultural barriers. Female gynecologic cancer diagnostic delays are mostly caused by cultural and societal hurdles, such as humiliation and a lack of family support. As a result, many individuals are unable to receive cancer treatment at an early stage. Additionally, patients with cancer have a high chance of being lost to follow-up, which has a significant impact on the availability of survival statistics. There are difficulties in upholding uniformity of informed consent because different languages and dialects are prevalent throughout India. Less than 10% of patients with newly diagnosed cancer in India have access to a therapeutic cancer clinical trial, indicating significant geographic variation in cancer clinical trial availability.  Even for common cancer forms like breast cancer, a significant interstate discrepancy in access to interventional trials was noted in a study measuring geographic disparities in cancer clinical research in India. It was found that the median sample size per year per state (SSY) was 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases. When cancer site-wise SSY was taken into account, disparities were even more pronounced. Only 29.7% of newly diagnosed cancer patients have a spot available in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial, even in the state with the greatest SSY.

3.4. Investigational New Drugs (IND) and Its Importance 30-32

A novel chemical or biological substance that has not been authorized for widespread use and is being assessed for quality, safety, and efficacy in human subjects is known as an Investigational New Drug (IND). Between preclinical research and clinical trials, the IND procedure acts as a scientific and legal link. The sponsor must submit a thorough IND dossier to the CDSCO in order to receive clearance before beginning any human trials. Typically, an IND dossier includes:

  1. Data from toxicology and animal pharmacology showing safety in preclinical studies .
  2. Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) data that guarantees the consistency and quality of the product .
  3. Clinical trial protocols that specify the goals, design, dosage, and safeguards for patients.

The purpose of IND review is to guarantee that ethical and scientific standards are upheld and that prospective clinical studies do not subject human participants to unjustifiable risks. The IND permits the sponsor to lawfully start Phase I–III clinical trials in India after it has been approved.

Figure 3: Contents of an Investigational New Drug (IND) Application. 33

Table 1: Regulatory Framework of Investigational New Drugs Application for Chemotherapeutic in India vs. USA vs. EMA 34-55

Parameter

India (CDSCO / NDCTR 2019)

United States (USFDA / 21 CFR Part 312)

Europe (EMA / EU CTR 536/2014)

Regulatory Authority

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), and Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO).

CDER (for chemotherapeutics) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

National Competent Authorities (NCAs) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) via CTIS.

Legal Basis / Regulation

The Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940's New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019.

21 CFR Part 312; Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

EU Clinical Trials Regulation No. 536/2014.

Type of Application

Clinical Trial Application (Form CT-04/CT-18) and Investigational New Drug (IND).

Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND).

Clinical Trial Application (CTA) using the CTIS Portal.

Submission Portal

SUGAM Portal (CDSCO online).

FDA Electronic Submissions Gateway for Electronic Common Technical Documents (eCTD).

A unified EU portal called the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).

Key Documents Required

Preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, CMC data, protocol, investigator's brochure, ethics committee approval, informed consent, and stability data.

Nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology, CMC, Clinical protocol, Investigator’s Brochure, pharmacology of cancer drugs, Safety monitoring plan.

IMPD (Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier), nonclinical, CMC, clinical protocol, investigator's brochure, and Part I and II documents.

Ethics Approval

Mandatory approval by registered Ethics Committee (EC).

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required.

Part II of the application is evaluated by National Ethics Committees.

Timeline for Approval

Depending on the country of origin (imported or domestic), 30 to 90 days. Deemed approval if no objection within timeline.

30 days following the submission of the IND, unless it is put on clinical hold.

Part I assessment takes 45 days, and national Part II takes about 60 days.

Chemotherapeutic Specific Guidance

Follows Schedule Y & NDCTR 2019 oncology trial guidance. Oncology trials require prior preclinical tumor models & dose escalation justification

.

Follows FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) recommendations — incorporates dose-finding, combination studies, biomarker-based designs.

complies with the EMA Oncology Guideline (EMA/CHMP/205/95 Rev.5) for anticancer pharmaceuticals

.

Clinical Trial Phases

Phases I–IV in accordance with NDCTR; each phase requires municipal permission.

Adaptive and basket trials were permitted for oncology in phases 0–IV.

Phase I–IV: adaptive and biomarker-driven trials are possible with centralized coordination using CTIS.

Safety Reporting

Periodic DSURs to CDSCO & EC; SAE/SUSAR must be notified within 14 calendar days.

Annual reporting to the FDA; expedited IND safety reports within 7 or 15 days.

SUSAR reporting via EudraVigilance; yearly safety reports (DSUR).

Compensation / Ethics

Compensation for injuries or deaths due to the trial is required; the sponsor and investigator share responsibility.

Payment in accordance with local IRB regulations; insurance coverage is typically necessary.

Insurance and participant protection are required; the sponsor is responsible.

Transparency / Registration

Prior to enrollment, registration in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI)

ClinicalTrials.gov registration is necessary (under FDAAA 801).

Public disclosure and registration using the CTIS database.

Inspections & Compliance

GCP compliance site inspections are carried out by CDSCO and DCGI.

Under GCP, the FDA does both routine and for-cause inspections.

Under GCP, EMA and NCAs work together to conduct inspections.

Expedited / Early Access Pathways

expedited clearance for orphan cancer medications and unmet medical requirements.

Priority Review, Accelerated Approval, Fast Track, and Breakthrough Therapy.

Conditional Marketing Authorization and the PRIME (PRIority Medicines) Program.

Post-Trial Access (PTA)

NDCTR-mandated provisions for patients, particularly those with life-threatening conditions like cancer.

IRB supervision; post-trial access at sponsor discretion.

mandated by national legislation and necessary for unmet medical needs.

Public Disclosure

restricted (through CTRI).

According to ClinicalTrials.gov, moderate.

High (complete trial data publishing via CTIS).

Regulatory Review Focus

Safety, efficacy, quality, compensation, and ethical protection.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, early effectiveness signs, and long-term toxicity.

harmonization throughout the EU, scientific validity, and ethical acceptability.

Table 2: Investigational New Drugs Application Approval Pathway for Chemotherapeutic In India vs. USA vs. EMA 56-62

Stage

India (CDSCO / DCGI)

USA (USFDA)

Europe (EMA)

Regulatory Authority

The Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) oversees the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), Directorate General of Health Services.

The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), or the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)

National Competent Authorities (NCAs) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA)

)

Legal Framework

New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules (NDCTR), 2019; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 & Rules, 1945

21 CFR Part 312; Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)

Directive 2001/83/EC; EU Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014

Application Type

Application for IND (Form CT-04)

Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND) (Form FDA 1571)

Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS)-based Clinical Trial Application (CTA)

Preclinical Data Requirements

ICH M3(R2) data on pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, acute and chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity; GLP-compliant data

Studies on pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, reproduction, and carcinogenicity in accordance with FDA GLP guidelines

ICH M3(R2) and OECD GLP guidelines for nonclinical research; CTD Module 4

Ethics Approval

CDSCO-registered Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC)

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Committees on Ethics in Every Member State

Submission Format

CTD, or Common Technical Document

eCTD format (Electronic CTD)

eCTD format with Module 1 tailored to the EU

Regulatory Review

Subject Expert Committee (SEC) → Technical Committee → Apex Committee (if applicable) → DCGI conclusion

Review by the relevant therapeutic division of the FDA

EMA or NCA evaluation, based on national or centralized protocol

Timeline for IND/CTA Authorization

30–90 days (after approval, Form CT-06 is issued)

 30 days (if there are flaws, the FDA may place a clinical hold).

60 days (for sophisticated therapy, this could go up to 90 days)

Clinical Trial Phases

Phase I: Safety of people

Phase I: security

Phase I: safety and dosage

Phase II: effectiveness

Phase II: effectiveness

Phase II: effectiveness

Phase III: Comparative analysis

Phase III: Verification

Phase III: multicentric pivotal

Phase IV: Post Marketing

Phase IV: Post Marketing

Phase IV: Pharmacovigilance

Trial Registration

India's Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI)

ClinicalTrials.gov

Register of EU Clinical Trials

Chemotherapy-Specific Guidelines

Schedule Y; NDCTR 2019; CDSCO guidelines for cancer research

FDA Oncology Drug Development Guidelines (updated in 2023)

The 2017 EMA Guideline on the Assessment of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Humans

Decision Authority

DCGI following the SEC's suggestion

FDA following IND/NDA evaluation

EMA (European Commission authorization → CHMP opinion)

Post-Approval Surveillance

Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) and Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR)

Post-market monitoring, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) (21 CFR 314.80)

Risk Management Plan (RMP) and Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR)

Approximate Overall Timeline

IND to Marketing: 1.5–3 years

IND to NDA: two to four years

CTA to MAA: three to five years

Harmonization Guidelines

Schedule Y, NDCTR 2019, ICH-GCP

21 CFR 50, 56, 312, ICH-GCP

EU Regulation 536/2014, ICH-GCP, and EMA oncology guidelines

3.5. Challenges in the IND Approval Process 63-67

Chemotherapeutic medication IND/CTA approval is fraught with difficulties in India, the USA, and the EMA. With problems like inadequate pharmacovigilance systems, inconsistent GLP/GCP compliance, delayed reviews, and a lack of infrastructure for cancer trials, India's regulatory harmonization under the NDCTR 2019 is still in progress. Despite having a strong FDA, the USA has difficulties because of the high expense and complexity of cancer trials, strict eligibility and ethical requirements, and the need to adjust to quickly changing treatments like gene therapy and immuno-oncology. The decentralized EMA-Member State arrangement in Europe results in lengthy review periods, complicated procedures, and challenges in coordinating data protection and ethics under GDPR. Patient recruitment, trial transparency, financial constraints, and the incorporation of empirical data continue to be major challenges in every country. Chemotherapeutic experimental drug approval is hampered by disparities in documentation, schedules, and infrastructure, even with good ICH-GCP alignment worldwide.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in regulatory structure, timeliness, and procedural requirements, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency all share a commitment to guaranteeing the safety, efficacy, and quality of oncology drugs through the approval process of Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for chemotherapeutic agents.

REFERENCES

              1. Backgrounds for Anticancer Drugs, Available from: URL:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23263289/#:~:text=Background%3A%20Regulatory%20approval%20of%20oncology,ultimately%20affect%20clinicians%20and%20patients1.
              2. Classification of Anticancer drugs image. Available from: URL: https://images.app.goo.gl/5d3Jxo99supBmAZg6.
              3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249, 2021.
              4. WCRF International: Global Cancer Data by Country | World Cancer Research Fund International, 2022. https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/global-cancer-data-by-country
              5. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Cancer Today. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
              6. Globocan 2020: India Factsheet. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf.
              7. Globocan 2020: India Factsheet. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf.
              8. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators: The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990–2016. Lancet Oncol 19:1289-1306, 2018.
              9. Kulothungan V, Sathishkumar K, Leburu S, et al: Burden of cancers in India—Estimates of cancer crude incidence, YLLs, YLDs and DALYs for 2021 and 2025 based on National Cancer Registry Program. BMC Cancer 22:527, 2022.
              10. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al: Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17-48, 2023
              11. Saini KS, Agarwal G, Jagannathan R, et al: Challenges in launching multinational oncology clinical trials in India. South Asian J Cancer 2:44-49, 2013.
              12. Roy AM, Mathew A: Audit of cancer clinical trials in India. JCO Glob Oncol 10.1200/JGO.19.00156.
              13. Clinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI): https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php.
              14. Bavdekar SB: Informed consent documents submitted for initial review: What do they state about compensation for injured research participants? Indian J Med Sci 63:455-460, 2009.
              15. Srivastava A, Jalink M, de Moraes FY, et al: Tracking the workforce 2020-2030: Making the case for a cancer workforce registry. JCO Glob Oncol 10.1200/GO.21.00093.
              16. Pramesh CS, Badwe RA, Bhoo-Pathy N, et al: Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: A global perspective. Nat Med 28:649-657, 2022.
              17. Katdare N: Obstacles and optimisation of oncology services in India, in Schmidt-Straßburger U (ed): Improving Oncology Worldwide: Education, Clinical Research and Global Cancer Care. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2022. pp 107-115. (Sustainable Development Goals Series).
              18. Sengar M, Fundytus A, Hopman WM, et al: Medical oncology in India: Workload, infrastructure, and delivery of care. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 40:121-127, 2019.
              19. Singh M, Prasad CP, Singh TD, et al: Cancer research in India: Challenges & opportunities. Indian J Med Res 148:362-365, 2018
              20. Chakraborty S, Mallick I, Luu HN, et al: Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Ecancermedicalscience 15:1161, 2021.
              21. Prinja S, Dixit J, Gupta N, et al: Development of national cancer database for cost and quality of life (CaDCQoL) in India: A protocol. BMJ Open 11:e048513, 2021.
              22. Ghosh J, Gupta S, Desai S, et al: Estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptor expression in breast tumors of patients, and their usage of HER2-targeted therapy, in a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Cancer 48:391-396, 2011.
              23. Sriram S, Khan MM: Effect of health insurance program for the poor on out-of-pocket inpatient care cost in India: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 20:839, 2020.
              24. Mahalakshmi S, Suresh S: Barriers to cancer screening uptake in women: A qualitative study from Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21:1081-1087, 2020
              25. Dsouza JP, Van den Broucke S, Pattanshetty S, et al: Exploring the barriers to cervical cancer screening through the lens of implementers and beneficiaries of the national screening program: A multi-contextual study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21:2209-2215, 2020.
              26. Kaur K, Jajoo R, Naman S, et al: Identifying barriers to early diagnosis of breast cancer and perception of women in Malwa region of Punjab, India. Glob Health J 7:34-42, 2023.
              27. Srinath A, van Merode F, Rao SV, et al: Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Health Policy Plan 38:509-527, 2023.
              28. Shivabasappa S Srinivasan A: Complexity of clinical trial operationalisation in India. Lancet Glob Health 10:e953, 2022.
              29. Mehrotra R, Yadav A, Sinha DN, et al: Smokeless tobacco control in 180 countries across the globe: Call to action for full implementation of WHO FCTC measures. Lancet Oncol 20:e208-e217, 2019.
              30. ICH stands for International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Industry Guidelines: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Good Clinical Practice Guidelines E6(R2). 2016.
              31. Kumar A, Sharma R, Reddy P. Indian IND submission regulations. J Pharm Res. 2020:14(6):101–10.
              32. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND) [Internet]. 2023. Applications/investigational-new-drug-ind-application
              33. Figure 3 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Contents-of-an-Investigational-New-Drug-IND-Application_fig2_336855637.
              34. Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 (NDCTR 2019). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2019. Available from: CDSCO official publications.
              35. CDSCO stands for Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Guidance documents and application forms for clinical trial approvals (including CT-04, CT-18) and SUGAM portal instructions. New Delhi: CDSCO; current edition.
              36. India's Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI). India's main clinical trial registry; registration guidelines and procedures. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)/National Institute of Medical Statistics; current.
              37. The Indian government. The 1940 Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the 1945 Rules (as amended). Text compiled by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
              38. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). 21 CFR Part 312: Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 312; current edition. U.S. Government Publishing Office/FDA.
              39. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Industry Guidelines: Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs): Content and Format. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); relevant guidance documents; various years (see specific documents for pre-IND, safety reporting and eCTD submission).
              40. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) — guidance and initiatives for oncology drug development. FDA OCE; current materials and oncology-specific guidances.
              41. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (Clinical Trials Regulation). Official Journal of the EU; 2014.
              42. Agency for European Medicines (EMA). Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) — Sponsor & User Guidance, CTIS Helpdesk and Sponsor Handbook. EMA; current documentation.
              43. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guidelines for assessing anticancer medications in humans (CHMP/EWP/205/95 Rev.5 or most recent revision). EMA/CHMP, London; most recent revision year.
              44. Agency for European Medicines (EMA). PRIME, or prioritized medications, is a regulatory support program. Current EMA advice and Q&A materials.
              45. EudraVigilance, the European Union. Guidance on reporting suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) and safety reporting requirements in the EU. EMA/EudraVigilance; current.
              46. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). ICH Secretariat; 2016 (and subsequent clarifications).
              47. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). ICH Secretariat; 2016 (and subsequent clarifications).
              48. Council for International Harmonization (ICH). E2F Development Safety Update Report (DSUR): Recommendations for regular safety reporting in clinical studies; pertinent ICH documents (e.g., E2A, E2F when appropriate).
              49. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Guidelines for the industry on FDAAA 801 and ClinicalTrials.gov registration and results reporting. Current: FDA & ClinicalTrials.gov.
              50. European Medicines Agency (EMA) / National Competent Authorities (NCAs). Guidance on inspections, GMP/GCP compliance and sponsor responsibilities for clinical trials in the EU. EMA/NCAs; various guidance documents (inspection procedures and GCP requirements).
              51. CDSCO stands for Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Regulatory guidance on compensation, post-trial access and investigator responsibilities under NDCTR/NDCTR amendments. CDSCO circulars and guidance documents; current.
              52. World Health Organization (WHO). International ethical standards for cancer trials and guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects (CIOMS/WHO guidelines). publications from WHO/CIOMS; different years.
              53. EUR-Lex, the European Commission. Combined text and explanations for Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 and CTIS implementation guidelines. EU Publications Office; current.
              54. FDA guidance(s) on first-in-human dose selection, dose escalation, combination oncology trials, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics for anticancer agents. FDA CDER/Oncology guidance collection.
              55. EMA reflection papers and scientific advice on oncology drug development, biomarkers and adaptive trial designs. EMA/CHMP documents.
              56. CDSCO. Clinical Trials and New Drugs Regulations, 2019.
              57. Investigational New Drug Application, U.S. FDA, 21 CFR Part 312.
              58. EMA. Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014.
              59. Nonclinical Safety Studies for Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization, ICH M3(R2).
              60. Guidelines for the Assessment of Anticancer Drugs in Humans, EMA, 2017.
              61. Guidance for Industry: Oncology Drug Development — Guidance for Industry, U.S. FDA, 2023.
              62. CDSCO. Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations, Schedule Y, 1945.
              63. Oncology Drug Development: Guidance for Industry, U.S. FDA. CDER (FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), 2023.
              64. World Health Organization (WHO). An international benchmarking tool for assessing national regulatory systems. WHO Technical Report, 2022.
              65. European Commission. Data Protection and Ethics in EU Clinical Research (GDPR Implementation Guide). Brussels, 2021.
              66. Ghosh, A., & Gupta, S. (2021). Regulatory challenges in oncology clinical trials in India: A comparative perspective. Journal of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 38(2), 85–93.
              67. DiMasi, J.A., Grabowski, H.G., & Hansen, R.W. (2022). Innovation in oncology drug development: Regulatory and economic barriers. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 21(4), 273–289.

Reference

  1. Backgrounds for Anticancer Drugs, Available from: URL:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23263289/#:~:text=Background%3A%20Regulatory%20approval%20of%20oncology,ultimately%20affect%20clinicians%20and%20patients1.
  2. Classification of Anticancer drugs image. Available from: URL: https://images.app.goo.gl/5d3Jxo99supBmAZg6.
  3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249, 2021.
  4. WCRF International: Global Cancer Data by Country | World Cancer Research Fund International, 2022. https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/global-cancer-data-by-country
  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Cancer Today. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
  6. Globocan 2020: India Factsheet. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf.
  7. Globocan 2020: India Factsheet. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf.
  8. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators: The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990–2016. Lancet Oncol 19:1289-1306, 2018.
  9. Kulothungan V, Sathishkumar K, Leburu S, et al: Burden of cancers in India—Estimates of cancer crude incidence, YLLs, YLDs and DALYs for 2021 and 2025 based on National Cancer Registry Program. BMC Cancer 22:527, 2022.
  10. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al: Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17-48, 2023
  11. Saini KS, Agarwal G, Jagannathan R, et al: Challenges in launching multinational oncology clinical trials in India. South Asian J Cancer 2:44-49, 2013.
  12. Roy AM, Mathew A: Audit of cancer clinical trials in India. JCO Glob Oncol 10.1200/JGO.19.00156.
  13. Clinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI): https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php.
  14. Bavdekar SB: Informed consent documents submitted for initial review: What do they state about compensation for injured research participants? Indian J Med Sci 63:455-460, 2009.
  15. Srivastava A, Jalink M, de Moraes FY, et al: Tracking the workforce 2020-2030: Making the case for a cancer workforce registry. JCO Glob Oncol 10.1200/GO.21.00093.
  16. Pramesh CS, Badwe RA, Bhoo-Pathy N, et al: Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: A global perspective. Nat Med 28:649-657, 2022.
  17. Katdare N: Obstacles and optimisation of oncology services in India, in Schmidt-Straßburger U (ed): Improving Oncology Worldwide: Education, Clinical Research and Global Cancer Care. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2022. pp 107-115. (Sustainable Development Goals Series).
  18. Sengar M, Fundytus A, Hopman WM, et al: Medical oncology in India: Workload, infrastructure, and delivery of care. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 40:121-127, 2019.
  19. Singh M, Prasad CP, Singh TD, et al: Cancer research in India: Challenges & opportunities. Indian J Med Res 148:362-365, 2018
  20. Chakraborty S, Mallick I, Luu HN, et al: Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Ecancermedicalscience 15:1161, 2021.
  21. Prinja S, Dixit J, Gupta N, et al: Development of national cancer database for cost and quality of life (CaDCQoL) in India: A protocol. BMJ Open 11:e048513, 2021.
  22. Ghosh J, Gupta S, Desai S, et al: Estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptor expression in breast tumors of patients, and their usage of HER2-targeted therapy, in a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Cancer 48:391-396, 2011.
  23. Sriram S, Khan MM: Effect of health insurance program for the poor on out-of-pocket inpatient care cost in India: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 20:839, 2020.
  24. Mahalakshmi S, Suresh S: Barriers to cancer screening uptake in women: A qualitative study from Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21:1081-1087, 2020
  25. Dsouza JP, Van den Broucke S, Pattanshetty S, et al: Exploring the barriers to cervical cancer screening through the lens of implementers and beneficiaries of the national screening program: A multi-contextual study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21:2209-2215, 2020.
  26. Kaur K, Jajoo R, Naman S, et al: Identifying barriers to early diagnosis of breast cancer and perception of women in Malwa region of Punjab, India. Glob Health J 7:34-42, 2023.
  27. Srinath A, van Merode F, Rao SV, et al: Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Health Policy Plan 38:509-527, 2023.
  28. Shivabasappa S Srinivasan A: Complexity of clinical trial operationalisation in India. Lancet Glob Health 10:e953, 2022.
  29. Mehrotra R, Yadav A, Sinha DN, et al: Smokeless tobacco control in 180 countries across the globe: Call to action for full implementation of WHO FCTC measures. Lancet Oncol 20:e208-e217, 2019.
  30. ICH stands for International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Industry Guidelines: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Good Clinical Practice Guidelines E6(R2). 2016.
  31. Kumar A, Sharma R, Reddy P. Indian IND submission regulations. J Pharm Res. 2020:14(6):101–10.
  32. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND) [Internet]. 2023. Applications/investigational-new-drug-ind-application
  33. Figure 3 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Contents-of-an-Investigational-New-Drug-IND-Application_fig2_336855637.
  34. Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 (NDCTR 2019). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2019. Available from: CDSCO official publications.
  35. CDSCO stands for Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Guidance documents and application forms for clinical trial approvals (including CT-04, CT-18) and SUGAM portal instructions. New Delhi: CDSCO; current edition.
  36. India's Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI). India's main clinical trial registry; registration guidelines and procedures. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)/National Institute of Medical Statistics; current.
  37. The Indian government. The 1940 Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the 1945 Rules (as amended). Text compiled by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
  38. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). 21 CFR Part 312: Application for Investigational New Drugs (IND). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 312; current edition. U.S. Government Publishing Office/FDA.
  39. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Industry Guidelines: Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs): Content and Format. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); relevant guidance documents; various years (see specific documents for pre-IND, safety reporting and eCTD submission).
  40. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) — guidance and initiatives for oncology drug development. FDA OCE; current materials and oncology-specific guidances.
  41. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (Clinical Trials Regulation). Official Journal of the EU; 2014.
  42. Agency for European Medicines (EMA). Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) — Sponsor & User Guidance, CTIS Helpdesk and Sponsor Handbook. EMA; current documentation.
  43. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guidelines for assessing anticancer medications in humans (CHMP/EWP/205/95 Rev.5 or most recent revision). EMA/CHMP, London; most recent revision year.
  44. Agency for European Medicines (EMA). PRIME, or prioritized medications, is a regulatory support program. Current EMA advice and Q&A materials.
  45. EudraVigilance, the European Union. Guidance on reporting suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) and safety reporting requirements in the EU. EMA/EudraVigilance; current.
  46. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). ICH Secretariat; 2016 (and subsequent clarifications).
  47. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). ICH Secretariat; 2016 (and subsequent clarifications).
  48. Council for International Harmonization (ICH). E2F Development Safety Update Report (DSUR): Recommendations for regular safety reporting in clinical studies; pertinent ICH documents (e.g., E2A, E2F when appropriate).
  49. Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA). Guidelines for the industry on FDAAA 801 and ClinicalTrials.gov registration and results reporting. Current: FDA & ClinicalTrials.gov.
  50. European Medicines Agency (EMA) / National Competent Authorities (NCAs). Guidance on inspections, GMP/GCP compliance and sponsor responsibilities for clinical trials in the EU. EMA/NCAs; various guidance documents (inspection procedures and GCP requirements).
  51. CDSCO stands for Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Regulatory guidance on compensation, post-trial access and investigator responsibilities under NDCTR/NDCTR amendments. CDSCO circulars and guidance documents; current.
  52. World Health Organization (WHO). International ethical standards for cancer trials and guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects (CIOMS/WHO guidelines). publications from WHO/CIOMS; different years.
  53. EUR-Lex, the European Commission. Combined text and explanations for Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 and CTIS implementation guidelines. EU Publications Office; current.
  54. FDA guidance(s) on first-in-human dose selection, dose escalation, combination oncology trials, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics for anticancer agents. FDA CDER/Oncology guidance collection.
  55. EMA reflection papers and scientific advice on oncology drug development, biomarkers and adaptive trial designs. EMA/CHMP documents.
  56. CDSCO. Clinical Trials and New Drugs Regulations, 2019.
  57. Investigational New Drug Application, U.S. FDA, 21 CFR Part 312.
  58. EMA. Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014.
  59. Nonclinical Safety Studies for Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization, ICH M3(R2).
  60. Guidelines for the Assessment of Anticancer Drugs in Humans, EMA, 2017.
  61. Guidance for Industry: Oncology Drug Development — Guidance for Industry, U.S. FDA, 2023.
  62. CDSCO. Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations, Schedule Y, 1945.
  63. Oncology Drug Development: Guidance for Industry, U.S. FDA. CDER (FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), 2023.
  64. World Health Organization (WHO). An international benchmarking tool for assessing national regulatory systems. WHO Technical Report, 2022.
  65. European Commission. Data Protection and Ethics in EU Clinical Research (GDPR Implementation Guide). Brussels, 2021.
  66. Ghosh, A., & Gupta, S. (2021). Regulatory challenges in oncology clinical trials in India: A comparative perspective. Journal of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 38(2), 85–93.
  67. DiMasi, J.A., Grabowski, H.G., & Hansen, R.W. (2022). Innovation in oncology drug development: Regulatory and economic barriers. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 21(4), 273–289.

Photo
Bhagwat Deshmukh
Corresponding author

M.pharm, Regulatory Affairs, S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Pratiksha Shinde
Co-author

S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Dr. Vijay Navghare
Co-author

Principal, S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Dr. Suryakant Jadhav
Co-author

Head of Department Regulatory Affairs, S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Somesh Kale
Co-author

S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Swapnil Kulkarni
Co-author

S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Nikita Delmade
Co-author

S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Photo
Mayuri Janakwade
Co-author

S.S.S. Indira College of Pharmacy, Vishnupuri. Nanded, Maharashtra

Bhagwat Deshmukh, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Suryakant Jadhav, Somesh Kale, Swapnil Kulkarni, Nikita Delmade, Mayuri Janakwade, Pratiksha Shinde, Approval Process of Investigational New Drugs Application for Chemotherapeutics Drugs in INDIA (CDSCO) Comparison with USA (USFDA) & EUROPE (EMA), Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19983176

More related articles
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overvi...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Preven...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta,...
Hepatotoxicity: Comprehensive Review...
Mahesh Manke , Padmaja Giram, Smita Shirale, Madhuri Shinde, Saba Shaikh...
Comprehensive Review on Cinnamon Essential Oil-Loaded Microcapsules and Their An...
Abhisekh Koiri, Dr. Nidhi Srivastava, Lokendra Kumar Pandey...
Related Articles
Review on Oral Fast Dissolving Film Technology: Materials, Methods...
Radhika D. Holkar, S. J. Dighade, P.G. Patil...
Novel Liquid-Assisted Grinding (LAG) Synthesis and Characterization of Schiff Ba...
Shraddha Chitale, Bhagyshree Jagtap, Sakshi Walunj, Ganesh Vitukade...
The Next Frontier Mucoadhesive and Mucus-Penetrating Nanoparticles: Overcoming t...
Pallavi Bilwe, Ayush Papadkar, Gayatri Badode, Samiksha Sonwal...
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
More related articles
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Prevention of Iron and Vitamin D Def...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta, Himanshu Roy, Sushil Raj, Md Musab...
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Prevention of Iron and Vitamin D Def...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta, Himanshu Roy, Sushil Raj, Md Musab...