We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
1,3,4,5,6 Soniya education trust’s College of Pharmacy, Dharwad-580004
2Department of Pediatrics , Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubuli-580021.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. Timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment results in gradual improvement in 60- 70% of cases. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody such as eculizumab, and treating complementary etiology
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment.1
HUS is classified as typical hemolytic uremic syndrome and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome also called as STEC-HUS (for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli HUS) Caused by Shiga toxin, E.coli, or shigella. aHUS caused by dysregulation of alternative pathway.5
Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. 3
Vascular endothelial cell injury is the key mechanism underlying all forms of HUS, these can be caused by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanism.2
The clinical presentation of aHUS in children and adults are often nonspecific including pallor, poor feeding, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness. Renal involvement may manifest as oliguria or anuria with or without peripheral edema. HTN is also an important manifestation that develop due to renal injury which can cause neurological complication or cardiac failure. 4
Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. It should be started within 24 hours of diagnosis with 20-30ml/kg body weight.3,7
Persistent hemolysis and or failure of platelet count improvement within 4-5 days after plasmatherpay is indication of failure of treatment hence should be stopped immediately, and start eculizumab it.4
Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management is a key component of HUS treatment. Dehydrated patients should be given appropriate fluid replacement, however excessive fluid overload should be avoided especially with patients developing oliguria. Hyponatremia occurs in renal injury hence it corrected carefully by hypertonic saline. Other electrolyte abnormalities (hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia) in initially managed medically, if severity persist dialysis and hemofiltration may be required. HUS patient with high catabolic rate is managed by giving carbohydrate’s and amino acid. If hemoglobin reduces below 6g/dl prbc transfusion is recommended. 2
Some patients with delayed diagnosis or irresponsive to therapy progress to ESRD. Renal replacement is done is such cases. Posttransplant HUS occurs in four clinical contexts that are inherited HUS, idiopathic HUS, de novo occurrence of HUS after renal transplant. Eculizumab is also used prophylactically to prevent reoccurrence of HUS after renal transplantation.2,4,
Case report:
A 7 yrs old male patient admitted in pediatric medicine department Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute (KMCRI) Hubballi, on 22 april 2026
Chief complaints:
This patient was referred from his native government hospital i/v/o vomiting, fever, headache, periorbital puffiness since 4 days, With h/o hematuria
Physical examination:
Pallor - +ve, Icterus - +ve, clubbing - -ve, cyanosis - -ve, lympedenopathy - -ve, edema - -ve.
Vital parameters:
Table : 1 Vital parameters:
|
Temperature |
37.5 oc |
|
Pulse rate |
120bpm |
|
Respiratory rate |
26cpm |
|
blood pressure |
120/70mmHg |
|
SpO2 |
99% |
Anthropometry:
Anthropometry assessment revealed weight, height, BMI and other parameters were appropriate for age, gender with no evidence of malnutrition
Table : 2 Systemic examination:
|
Cardiovascular system |
Pericardium normal, normal heart sound with no murmur |
|
Respiratory system |
NVBS +ve, A/E - +ve |
|
Central nervous system |
Conscious oriented, HMF intact, |
|
Per abdomen |
Tenderness present in right upper quadrant, bowel sound +ve |
Table : 3 Neurological examination:
|
|
Upper limb |
Lower limb |
||
|
|
Right |
Left |
Right |
Left |
|
Muscle |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
|
Power |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
|
Tone |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
|
Reflex |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
Table : 4 Hematological report:
|
Parameter |
21/04/2026 |
26/04/2026 |
1/05/2026 |
10/05/2026 |
Normal value |
|
Hemoglobin |
6.3 |
8.3 |
8 |
9.3 |
12-15g/dl |
|
WBC |
10400 |
9030 |
4450 |
4840 |
5000-13000/ul |
|
Lymphocytes |
42.9 |
41.9 |
51.3 |
58.6 |
28-48% |
|
Neutrophils |
53 |
40.2 |
27.4 |
3.0 |
33-72% |
|
PCV |
18.0 |
- |
23.9 |
27.6 |
35-50% |
|
MCV |
77.8 |
- |
- |
89.0 |
77- 95fl |
|
MCH |
27.3 |
- |
- |
30.0 |
25-33pg |
|
MCHC |
35.1 |
- |
- |
33.7 |
31-37% |
|
PLT |
0.32 |
0.43 |
|
1.55 |
1.7-4.5lakhs/cmm |
|
S. urea |
178.0 |
124.0 |
121.0 |
48.2 |
15- 45 mg/dl |
|
S. creatinine |
4.7 |
4.3 |
3.2 |
1.0 |
0.7-1.3mg/dl |
|
S. Sodium |
132.9 |
127.6 |
140.1 |
138.5 |
135-145mmol/l |
|
S. Potassium |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.5-5.0mmol/l |
|
S. Chloride |
99.6 |
95.9 |
88.8 |
105.2 |
98-107mmol/l |
|
LDH |
3357.0 |
- |
- |
- |
142-270U/L |
|
Rc |
30 |
|
|
|
2-6% |
|
ASLO |
negative |
|
|
|
0-200IU/ml |
Peripheral smear report:
RBC- microcytic hypochromic with macroovulocytes with few nucleated RBC’s and good number of acanthocytes.
Impression:
Microcytic hypochromic anemia with relative lymphocytosis and thrombocytopenia.
Table : 5 LFT:
|
Parameter |
Observed value |
Normal value |
|
Total bilirubin |
1.4 |
0.3-1.2mg/dl |
|
Direct bilirubin |
0.2 |
0.03-0.18mg/dl |
|
Indirect bilirubin |
1.20 |
0.75mg/dl |
|
Total protein |
6.0 |
6-8.3g/dl |
|
Serum albumin |
3.0 |
3.5-5.0g/dl |
|
Serum globulin |
3 |
2.3-3.5g/dl |
|
A/G ratio |
1 |
1-2.5 |
|
AST |
172.0 |
Upto 35U/L |
|
ALT |
52.1 |
Upto 45U/L |
|
ALP |
7.0 |
54 – 369U/L |
Table : 6 Arterial blood gas analysis:
|
pH |
7.45 |
7.35 – 7.45mmol/l |
|
pCO2 |
23 |
35-45mmhg |
|
PO2 |
34 |
80-100mmhg |
|
HCO3 |
16 |
22-30mmol/l |
|
TCO2 |
16.7 |
19-24mmol/l |
|
BEecf |
-8.0 |
-3 - 7 mmol/l |
Urine routine analysis:
Table : 7 Chemical examination:
|
Urine glucose |
nil |
Absent |
|
Urine protein |
present |
Absent |
Table : 8 Microscopic examination:
|
parameter |
result |
Reference range |
|
Pus cells (wbc’s) |
2-4 |
0-5 |
|
RBC |
1-2 |
0-2 |
Urine culture and sensitivity test: no growth
Stool culture and sensitivity test: no enteric bacterial pathogen isolated
Ultrasonography reports:
-mild hepatosplenomegaly with increased echotexture of liver
-b/l kidney- bulky with increased echotexture and loss of CMD- likely s/o renal parenchymal diseases with RI values less than 0.8
-wedge shaped hypodensity seen in upper poles of right kidney? infract
-minimal interbowel loop fluid.
The patient was diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic(aHUS) syndrome. The patient underwent a detailed clinical examination including assessment of vital signs, systemic examination, physical examination, neurological examination, peripheral blood smear, hematological investigations, routine urinalysis, ASLO test, USG of abdomen, urine and stool culture and sensitivity test. The vital signs and anthropometry were normal, on physical examination pallor and icterus was seen. In systemic examination the tenderness was present in right upper quadrant, neurological examination showed mild weakness with normal reflexes. The low hemoglobin level with marked LDH and peripheral blood smear raised suspicion of hemolytic anemia. Whereas elevated urea, creatinine, abnormal LFT and USG report demonstrated significant renal involvement, the arterial blood gas investigation showed metabolic acidosis these findings were considered supportive of the patient systemic and renal dysfunction. In view of the combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a thrombotic microangiopathy was suspected. HUS was considered as differential diagnosis. Urine and stool culture sensitivity and ASLO test were negative for an infectious etiology making typical HUS less likely. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA. For treatment four sessions of dialysis were performed to manage AKI and patient developed severe HTN after first dialysis hence he was treated with tablet nefidipine and later titrated and shifted to tablet amlodipine when BP subsequently shows decreasing trends. plasmapheresis was done to which patient responded well hence continued the same treatment. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were given as supportive therapy.
Table : 9 Treatment chart:
|
SI NO |
Drug |
Dose |
ROA |
Frequency |
Days given |
|
01 |
Allowed orally |
|
|
|
|
|
02 |
T. paracetamol |
500mg |
PO |
SOS |
|
|
03 |
Inj. Ranitidine |
0.5cc |
IV |
BID |
4days then stopped |
|
04 |
Inj. emeset |
2mg |
IV |
SOS |
4days then stopped |
|
05 |
T. Nifedipine |
5mg |
PO |
BD |
On 4th day |
|
06 |
T. Nifedipine |
2.5mg |
PO |
BD |
From 5th – 11th day |
|
07 |
Inj. pantoprazole |
20mg |
IV |
OD |
From 5th day |
|
08 |
Syp. Calcium |
5ml |
PO |
TID |
From 6th day |
|
09 |
Syp. multivitamin |
5ml |
PO |
BID |
From 6th day |
|
10 |
T. Nifedipine |
2.5mg |
PO |
TID |
From 12th- 15th day |
|
11 |
Syp.potklor |
2ml |
PO |
QID |
On 13th day |
|
12 |
T. Amlodipine |
10mg |
PO |
HS |
From 16th day |
Dialysis –4 cycles done on 23/4/26, 25/04/2026, 29/04/2026, 30/04/2026
After first dialysis patient developed BP hence titrated with nifedipine.
Plasmapheresis – 4 cycles done.
DISCUSSION
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is rare life threatening TMA with a characteristic triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Atypical HUS is mainly associated with dysregulation of complementary pathways unlike typical HUS.5
Differential diagnosis:
The differential diagnosis for aHUS were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA. The combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a TMA was suspected. However, ASLO test and antimicrobial test were negative, and the absence of diarrhea which exclude it from typical HUS. Clinical assessment and marked renal dysfunction favours a HUS over TTP. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA.
The key management strategy for aHUS is plasmapheresis following which patient’s hemoglobin, platelet were increasing gradually, dialysis was performed to reverse AKI and HTN was managed by nifedipine titration which was then switched to amlodipine. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were administrated as supportive therapy.
CONCLUSION
Sever patients with aHUS progress to ESRD hence early diagnosis and proper differentiation from TTP, typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA is very important for proper management of a HUS. Identification of complentary abnormality helps to accurately manage aHUS. In this case timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment resulted in gradual improvement. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, eculizumab. Thus early recognition, accurate diagnosis and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy are important for preventing disease progression and improving long term patient outcome.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Director and the Head of the Department of Pediatrics at KMCRI (Karnataka Institute of Medical College and Research Institute), Hubballi, for their invaluable support, guidance, and for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this work. Special thanks are also extended to the President of Soniya education trust’s , Dharwad, for his encouragement and for fostering an environment conducive to academic excellence and research. Special Gratitude to our beloved parents for unconditional support throughout the journey.
REFERENCES
Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in immunopathology 2014 Jul (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 399-420). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment.1
HUS is classified as typical hemolytic uremic syndrome and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome also called as STEC-HUS (for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli HUS) Caused by Shiga toxin, E.coli, or shigella. aHUS caused by dysregulation of alternative pathway.5
Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. 3
Vascular endothelial cell injury is the key mechanism underlying all forms of HUS, these can be caused by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanism.2
The clinical presentation of aHUS in children and adults are often nonspecific including pallor, poor feeding, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness. Renal involvement may manifest as oliguria or anuria with or without peripheral edema. HTN is also an important manifestation that develop due to renal injury which can cause neurological complication or cardiac failure. 4
Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. It should be started within 24 hours of diagnosis with 20-30ml/kg body weight.3,7
Persistent hemolysis and or failure of platelet count improvement within 4-5 days after plasmatherpay is indication of failure of treatment hence should be stopped immediately, and start eculizumab it.4
Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management is a key component of HUS treatment. Dehydrated patients should be given appropriate fluid replacement, however excessive fluid overload should be avoided especially with patients developing oliguria. Hyponatremia occurs in renal injury hence it corrected carefully by hypertonic saline. Other electrolyte abnormalities (hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia) in initially managed medically, if severity persist dialysis and hemofiltration may be required. HUS patient with high catabolic rate is managed by giving carbohydrate’s and amino acid. If hemoglobin reduces below 6g/dl prbc transfusion is recommended. 2
Some patients with delayed diagnosis or irresponsive to therapy progress to ESRD. Renal replacement is done is such cases. Posttransplant HUS occurs in four clinical contexts that are inherited HUS, idiopathic HUS, de novo occurrence of HUS after renal transplant. Eculizumab is also used prophylactically to prevent reoccurrence of HUS after renal transplantation.2,4,
Case report:
A 7 yrs old male patient admitted in pediatric medicine department Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute (KMCRI) Hubballi, on 22 april 2026
Chief complaints:
This patient was referred from his native government hospital i/v/o vomiting, fever, headache, periorbital puffiness since 4 days, With h/o hematuria
Physical examination:
Pallor - +ve, Icterus - +ve, clubbing - -ve, cyanosis - -ve, lympedenopathy - -ve, edema - -ve.
Vital parameters:
Table : 1 Vital parameters:
|
Temperature |
37.5 oc |
|
Pulse rate |
120bpm |
|
Respiratory rate |
26cpm |
|
blood pressure |
120/70mmHg |
|
SpO2 |
99% |
Anthropometry:
Anthropometry assessment revealed weight, height, BMI and other parameters were appropriate for age, gender with no evidence of malnutrition
Table : 2 Systemic examination:
|
Cardiovascular system |
Pericardium normal, normal heart sound with no murmur |
|
Respiratory system |
NVBS +ve, A/E - +ve |
|
Central nervous system |
Conscious oriented, HMF intact, |
|
Per abdomen |
Tenderness present in right upper quadrant, bowel sound +ve |
Table : 3 Neurological examination:
|
|
Upper limb |
Lower limb |
||
|
|
Right |
Left |
Right |
Left |
|
Muscle |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
|
Power |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
4/5+ |
|
Tone |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
Normal |
|
Reflex |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
Table : 4 Hematological report:
|
Parameter |
21/04/2026 |
26/04/2026 |
1/05/2026 |
10/05/2026 |
Normal value |
|
Hemoglobin |
6.3 |
8.3 |
8 |
9.3 |
12-15g/dl |
|
WBC |
10400 |
9030 |
4450 |
4840 |
5000-13000/ul |
|
Lymphocytes |
42.9 |
41.9 |
51.3 |
58.6 |
28-48% |
|
Neutrophils |
53 |
40.2 |
27.4 |
3.0 |
33-72% |
|
PCV |
18.0 |
- |
23.9 |
27.6 |
35-50% |
|
MCV |
77.8 |
- |
- |
89.0 |
77- 95fl |
|
MCH |
27.3 |
- |
- |
30.0 |
25-33pg |
|
MCHC |
35.1 |
- |
- |
33.7 |
31-37% |
|
PLT |
0.32 |
0.43 |
|
1.55 |
1.7-4.5lakhs/cmm |
|
S. urea |
178.0 |
124.0 |
121.0 |
48.2 |
15- 45 mg/dl |
|
S. creatinine |
4.7 |
4.3 |
3.2 |
1.0 |
0.7-1.3mg/dl |
|
S. Sodium |
132.9 |
127.6 |
140.1 |
138.5 |
135-145mmol/l |
|
S. Potassium |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.5-5.0mmol/l |
|
S. Chloride |
99.6 |
95.9 |
88.8 |
105.2 |
98-107mmol/l |
|
LDH |
3357.0 |
- |
- |
- |
142-270U/L |
|
Rc |
30 |
|
|
|
2-6% |
|
ASLO |
negative |
|
|
|
0-200IU/ml |
Peripheral smear report:
RBC- microcytic hypochromic with macroovulocytes with few nucleated RBC’s and good number of acanthocytes.
Impression:
Microcytic hypochromic anemia with relative lymphocytosis and thrombocytopenia.
Table : 5 LFT:
|
Parameter |
Observed value |
Normal value |
|
Total bilirubin |
1.4 |
0.3-1.2mg/dl |
|
Direct bilirubin |
0.2 |
0.03-0.18mg/dl |
|
Indirect bilirubin |
1.20 |
0.75mg/dl |
|
Total protein |
6.0 |
6-8.3g/dl |
|
Serum albumin |
3.0 |
3.5-5.0g/dl |
|
Serum globulin |
3 |
2.3-3.5g/dl |
|
A/G ratio |
1 |
1-2.5 |
|
AST |
172.0 |
Upto 35U/L |
|
ALT |
52.1 |
Upto 45U/L |
|
ALP |
7.0 |
54 – 369U/L |
Table : 6 Arterial blood gas analysis:
|
pH |
7.45 |
7.35 – 7.45mmol/l |
|
pCO2 |
23 |
35-45mmhg |
|
PO2 |
34 |
80-100mmhg |
|
HCO3 |
16 |
22-30mmol/l |
|
TCO2 |
16.7 |
19-24mmol/l |
|
BEecf |
-8.0 |
-3 - 7 mmol/l |
Urine routine analysis:
Table : 7 Chemical examination:
|
Urine glucose |
nil |
Absent |
|
Urine protein |
present |
Absent |
Table : 8 Microscopic examination:
|
parameter |
result |
Reference range |
|
Pus cells (wbc’s) |
2-4 |
0-5 |
|
RBC |
1-2 |
0-2 |
Urine culture and sensitivity test: no growth
Stool culture and sensitivity test: no enteric bacterial pathogen isolated
Ultrasonography reports:
-mild hepatosplenomegaly with increased echotexture of liver
-b/l kidney- bulky with increased echotexture and loss of CMD- likely s/o renal parenchymal diseases with RI values less than 0.8
-wedge shaped hypodensity seen in upper poles of right kidney? infract
-minimal interbowel loop fluid.
The patient was diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic(aHUS) syndrome. The patient underwent a detailed clinical examination including assessment of vital signs, systemic examination, physical examination, neurological examination, peripheral blood smear, hematological investigations, routine urinalysis, ASLO test, USG of abdomen, urine and stool culture and sensitivity test. The vital signs and anthropometry were normal, on physical examination pallor and icterus was seen. In systemic examination the tenderness was present in right upper quadrant, neurological examination showed mild weakness with normal reflexes. The low hemoglobin level with marked LDH and peripheral blood smear raised suspicion of hemolytic anemia. Whereas elevated urea, creatinine, abnormal LFT and USG report demonstrated significant renal involvement, the arterial blood gas investigation showed metabolic acidosis these findings were considered supportive of the patient systemic and renal dysfunction. In view of the combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a thrombotic microangiopathy was suspected. HUS was considered as differential diagnosis. Urine and stool culture sensitivity and ASLO test were negative for an infectious etiology making typical HUS less likely. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA. For treatment four sessions of dialysis were performed to manage AKI and patient developed severe HTN after first dialysis hence he was treated with tablet nefidipine and later titrated and shifted to tablet amlodipine when BP subsequently shows decreasing trends. plasmapheresis was done to which patient responded well hence continued the same treatment. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were given as supportive therapy.
Table : 9 Treatment chart:
|
SI NO |
Drug |
Dose |
ROA |
Frequency |
Days given |
|
01 |
Allowed orally |
|
|
|
|
|
02 |
T. paracetamol |
500mg |
PO |
SOS |
|
|
03 |
Inj. Ranitidine |
0.5cc |
IV |
BID |
4days then stopped |
|
04 |
Inj. emeset |
2mg |
IV |
SOS |
4days then stopped |
|
05 |
T. Nifedipine |
5mg |
PO |
BD |
On 4th day |
|
06 |
T. Nifedipine |
2.5mg |
PO |
BD |
From 5th – 11th day |
|
07 |
Inj. pantoprazole |
20mg |
IV |
OD |
From 5th day |
|
08 |
Syp. Calcium |
5ml |
PO |
TID |
From 6th day |
|
09 |
Syp. multivitamin |
5ml |
PO |
BID |
From 6th day |
|
10 |
T. Nifedipine |
2.5mg |
PO |
TID |
From 12th- 15th day |
|
11 |
Syp.potklor |
2ml |
PO |
QID |
On 13th day |
|
12 |
T. Amlodipine |
10mg |
PO |
HS |
From 16th day |
Dialysis –4 cycles done on 23/4/26, 25/04/2026, 29/04/2026, 30/04/2026
After first dialysis patient developed BP hence titrated with nifedipine.
Plasmapheresis – 4 cycles done.
DISCUSSION
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is rare life threatening TMA with a characteristic triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Atypical HUS is mainly associated with dysregulation of complementary pathways unlike typical HUS.5
Differential diagnosis:
The differential diagnosis for aHUS were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA. The combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a TMA was suspected. However, ASLO test and antimicrobial test were negative, and the absence of diarrhea which exclude it from typical HUS. Clinical assessment and marked renal dysfunction favours a HUS over TTP. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA.
The key management strategy for aHUS is plasmapheresis following which patient’s hemoglobin, platelet were increasing gradually, dialysis was performed to reverse AKI and HTN was managed by nifedipine titration which was then switched to amlodipine. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were administrated as supportive therapy.
CONCLUSION
Sever patients with aHUS progress to ESRD hence early diagnosis and proper differentiation from TTP, typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA is very important for proper management of a HUS. Identification of complentary abnormality helps to accurately manage aHUS. In this case timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment resulted in gradual improvement. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, eculizumab. Thus early recognition, accurate diagnosis and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy are important for preventing disease progression and improving long term patient outcome.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Director and the Head of the Department of Pediatrics at KMCRI (Karnataka Institute of Medical College and Research Institute), Hubballi, for their invaluable support, guidance, and for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this work. Special thanks are also extended to the President of Soniya education trust’s , Dharwad, for his encouragement and for fostering an environment conducive to academic excellence and research. Special Gratitude to our beloved parents for unconditional support throughout the journey.
REFERENCES
Afifa. Bidari, Siddappa Dandanavar, Varun Mathapati, Chetan Savant, V H Kulkarni, Akanksha Badiger, Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (Ahus) Syndrome With Kidney Injury In Pediatric Patient : A Case Report, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 9, 2878-2884, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22915073
10.5281/zenodo.22915073