View Article

Abstract

Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. Timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment results in gradual improvement in 60- 70% of cases. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody such as eculizumab, and treating complementary etiology

Keywords

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (aHUS) Syndrome, plasmapheresis, TMA, complementary pathway

Introduction

× Popup Image

Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment.1

HUS is classified as typical hemolytic uremic syndrome and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome also called as STEC-HUS (for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli HUS) Caused by Shiga toxin, E.coli, or shigella. aHUS caused by dysregulation of alternative pathway.5

Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. 3

Vascular endothelial cell injury is the key mechanism underlying all forms of HUS, these can be caused by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanism.2

The clinical presentation of aHUS in children and adults are often nonspecific including pallor, poor feeding, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness. Renal involvement may manifest as oliguria or anuria with or without peripheral edema. HTN is also an important manifestation that develop due to renal injury which can cause neurological complication or cardiac failure. 4

Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. It should be started within 24 hours of diagnosis with 20-30ml/kg body weight.3,7

Persistent hemolysis and or failure of platelet count improvement within 4-5 days after plasmatherpay is indication of failure of treatment hence should be stopped immediately, and start eculizumab it.4

Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management is a key component of HUS treatment. Dehydrated patients should be given appropriate fluid replacement, however excessive fluid overload should be avoided especially with patients developing oliguria. Hyponatremia occurs in renal injury hence it corrected carefully by hypertonic saline. Other electrolyte abnormalities (hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia) in initially managed medically, if severity persist dialysis and hemofiltration may be required. HUS patient with high catabolic rate is managed by giving carbohydrate’s and amino acid. If hemoglobin reduces below 6g/dl prbc transfusion is recommended. 2

Some patients with delayed diagnosis or irresponsive to therapy progress to ESRD. Renal replacement is done is such cases. Posttransplant HUS occurs in four clinical contexts that are inherited HUS, idiopathic HUS, de novo occurrence of HUS after renal transplant. Eculizumab is also used prophylactically to prevent reoccurrence of HUS after renal transplantation.2,4,

Case report:

A 7 yrs old male patient admitted in pediatric medicine department Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute (KMCRI) Hubballi, on 22 april 2026

Chief complaints:

This patient was referred from his native  government hospital i/v/o vomiting, fever, headache, periorbital puffiness since 4 days, With h/o hematuria

Physical examination:

Pallor - +ve, Icterus - +ve, clubbing - -ve, cyanosis - -ve, lympedenopathy - -ve, edema - -ve.

Vital parameters:

Table : 1 Vital parameters:

Temperature

37.5 oc

Pulse rate

120bpm

Respiratory rate

26cpm

blood pressure

120/70mmHg

SpO2

99%

                     

Anthropometry:

Anthropometry assessment revealed weight, height, BMI and other parameters were appropriate for age, gender with no evidence of malnutrition

 

 

 

Table : 2 Systemic examination:

Cardiovascular system

Pericardium normal, normal heart sound with no murmur

Respiratory system

NVBS +ve, A/E - +ve

Central nervous system

Conscious oriented, HMF intact,

Per abdomen

Tenderness present in right upper quadrant, bowel sound +ve

 

Table : 3 Neurological examination:

 

Upper limb

Lower limb

 

Right

Left

Right

Left

Muscle

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Power

4/5+

4/5+

4/5+

4/5+

Tone

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Reflex

2+

2+

2+

2+

 

Table : 4 Hematological report:

Parameter

21/04/2026

26/04/2026

1/05/2026

10/05/2026

Normal value

Hemoglobin

6.3

8.3

8

9.3

12-15g/dl

WBC

10400

9030

4450

4840

5000-13000/ul

Lymphocytes

42.9

41.9

51.3

58.6

28-48%

Neutrophils

53

40.2

27.4

3.0

33-72%

PCV

18.0

-

23.9

27.6

35-50%

MCV

77.8

-

-

89.0

77- 95fl

MCH

27.3

-

-

30.0

25-33pg

MCHC

35.1

-

-

33.7

31-37%

PLT

0.32

0.43

 

1.55

1.7-4.5lakhs/cmm

S. urea

178.0

124.0

121.0

48.2

15- 45 mg/dl

S. creatinine

4.7

4.3

3.2

1.0

0.7-1.3mg/dl

S. Sodium

132.9

127.6

140.1

138.5

135-145mmol/l

S. Potassium

3.5

3.7

3.7

3.9

3.5-5.0mmol/l

S. Chloride

99.6

95.9

88.8

105.2

98-107mmol/l

LDH

3357.0

-

-

-

142-270U/L

Rc

30

 

 

 

2-6%

ASLO

negative

 

 

 

0-200IU/ml

 

Peripheral smear report:

RBC- microcytic hypochromic with macroovulocytes with few nucleated RBC’s and good number of acanthocytes.

Impression:

Microcytic hypochromic anemia with relative lymphocytosis and thrombocytopenia.

 

 

 

 

Table : 5 LFT:

Parameter

Observed value

Normal value

Total bilirubin

1.4

0.3-1.2mg/dl

Direct bilirubin

0.2

0.03-0.18mg/dl

Indirect bilirubin

1.20

0.75mg/dl

Total protein

6.0

6-8.3g/dl

Serum albumin

3.0

3.5-5.0g/dl

Serum globulin

3

2.3-3.5g/dl

A/G ratio

1

1-2.5

AST

172.0

Upto 35U/L

ALT

52.1

Upto 45U/L

ALP

7.0

54 – 369U/L

 

Table : 6 Arterial blood gas analysis:

pH

7.45

7.35 – 7.45mmol/l

pCO2

23

35-45mmhg

PO2

34

80-100mmhg

HCO3

16

22-30mmol/l

TCO2

16.7

19-24mmol/l

BEecf

-8.0

-3 -  7 mmol/l

 

Urine routine analysis:

 

Table : 7 Chemical examination:

Urine glucose

nil

Absent

Urine protein

present

Absent

 

Table : 8 Microscopic examination:

parameter

result

Reference range

Pus cells (wbc’s)

2-4

0-5

RBC

1-2

0-2

 

Urine culture and sensitivity test: no growth

Stool culture and sensitivity test: no enteric bacterial pathogen isolated

Ultrasonography reports:

-mild hepatosplenomegaly with increased echotexture of liver

-b/l kidney- bulky with increased echotexture and loss of CMD- likely s/o renal parenchymal diseases with RI values less than 0.8

-wedge shaped hypodensity seen in upper poles of right kidney? infract

-minimal interbowel loop fluid.

The patient was diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic(aHUS) syndrome. The patient underwent a detailed clinical examination including assessment of vital signs, systemic examination, physical examination, neurological examination, peripheral blood smear, hematological investigations, routine urinalysis, ASLO test, USG of abdomen, urine and stool culture and sensitivity test. The vital signs and anthropometry were normal, on physical examination pallor and icterus was seen. In systemic examination the tenderness was present in right upper quadrant, neurological examination showed mild weakness with normal reflexes. The low hemoglobin level with marked LDH and peripheral blood smear raised suspicion of hemolytic anemia. Whereas elevated urea, creatinine, abnormal LFT and USG report demonstrated significant renal involvement, the arterial blood gas investigation showed metabolic acidosis these findings were considered supportive of the patient systemic and renal dysfunction. In view of the combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a thrombotic microangiopathy was suspected. HUS was considered as differential diagnosis. Urine and stool culture sensitivity and ASLO test were negative for an infectious etiology making typical HUS less likely. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA. For treatment four sessions of dialysis were performed to manage AKI and patient developed severe HTN after first dialysis hence he was treated with tablet nefidipine and later titrated and shifted to tablet amlodipine when BP subsequently shows decreasing trends. plasmapheresis was done to which patient responded well hence continued the same treatment. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were given as supportive therapy.

 

 

Table : 9 Treatment chart:

SI NO

Drug

Dose

ROA

Frequency

Days given

01

Allowed orally

 

 

 

 

02

T. paracetamol

500mg

PO

SOS

 

03

Inj. Ranitidine

0.5cc

IV

BID

4days then stopped

04

Inj. emeset

2mg

IV

SOS

4days then stopped

05

T. Nifedipine

5mg

PO

BD

On 4th day

06

T. Nifedipine

2.5mg

PO

BD

From 5th – 11th  day

07

Inj. pantoprazole

20mg

IV

OD

From 5th day

08

Syp. Calcium

5ml

PO

TID

From 6th day

09

Syp. multivitamin

5ml

PO

BID

From 6th day

10

T. Nifedipine

2.5mg

PO

TID

From 12th- 15th day

11

Syp.potklor

2ml

PO

QID

On 13th day

12

T. Amlodipine

10mg

PO

HS

From 16th  day

 

Dialysis –4 cycles done on 23/4/26, 25/04/2026, 29/04/2026, 30/04/2026

After first dialysis patient developed BP hence titrated with nifedipine.

Plasmapheresis – 4 cycles done.

DISCUSSION

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is rare life threatening TMA with a characteristic triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Atypical HUS is mainly associated with dysregulation of complementary pathways unlike typical HUS.5

Differential diagnosis:

The differential diagnosis for aHUS were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA. The combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a TMA was suspected. However, ASLO test and antimicrobial test were negative, and the absence of diarrhea which exclude it from typical HUS. Clinical assessment and marked renal dysfunction favours a HUS over TTP. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA.

The key management strategy for aHUS is plasmapheresis following which patient’s hemoglobin, platelet were increasing gradually, dialysis was performed to reverse AKI and HTN was managed by nifedipine titration which was then switched to amlodipine. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were administrated as supportive therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sever patients with aHUS progress to ESRD hence early diagnosis and proper differentiation from TTP, typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA is very important for proper management of a HUS. Identification of complentary abnormality helps to accurately manage aHUS. In this case timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment resulted in gradual improvement. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, eculizumab. Thus early recognition, accurate diagnosis and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy are important for preventing disease progression and improving long term patient outcome.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Director and the Head of the Department of Pediatrics at KMCRI (Karnataka Institute of Medical College and Research Institute), Hubballi, for their invaluable support, guidance, and for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this work. Special thanks are also extended to the President of Soniya education trust’s , Dharwad, for his encouragement and for fostering an environment conducive to academic excellence and research. Special Gratitude to our beloved parents for unconditional support throughout the journey.

REFERENCES

  1. Yoshida Y, Kato H, Ikeda Y, Nangaku M. Pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):99-110.
  2. Kaplan BS, Meyers KE, Schulman SL. The pathogenesis and treatment of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1998 Jun 1;9(6):1126-33.
  3. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic–uremic syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1676-87.
  4. Nester CM, Thomas CP. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: what is it, how is it diagnosed, and how is it treated?. Hematology 2010, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book. 2012 Dec 8;2012(1):617-25.
  5. Corrigan Jr JJ, Boineau FG. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Pediatrics in Review. 2001 Nov 1;22(11):365-9.
  6. Zuber J, Le Quintrec M, Sberro-Soussan R, Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Legendre C. New insights into postrenal transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2011 Jan;7(1):23-35.
  7. Loirat C, Garnier A, Sellier-Leclerc AL, Kwon T. Plasmatherapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2010 Sep (Vol. 36, No. 06, pp. 673-681). © Thieme Medical Publishers.
  8. de Córdoba SR, Hidalgo MS, Pinto S, Tortajada A. Genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2014 Jun (Vol. 40, No. 04, pp. 422-430). Thieme Medical Publishers.

Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in immunopathology 2014 Jul (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 399-420). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment.1

HUS is classified as typical hemolytic uremic syndrome and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome also called as STEC-HUS (for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli HUS) Caused by Shiga toxin, E.coli, or shigella. aHUS caused by dysregulation of alternative pathway.5

Approximately 10% of cases of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome is classified as atypical, since they are not caused by either Stx-producing bacteria or streptococci. 3

Vascular endothelial cell injury is the key mechanism underlying all forms of HUS, these can be caused by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanism.2

The clinical presentation of aHUS in children and adults are often nonspecific including pallor, poor feeding, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness. Renal involvement may manifest as oliguria or anuria with or without peripheral edema. HTN is also an important manifestation that develop due to renal injury which can cause neurological complication or cardiac failure. 4

Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment are essential in patient with a HUS which involves supportive care and inhibition of complement system. Plasmatherapy is recommended as first line treatment approach for aHUS. It should be started within 24 hours of diagnosis with 20-30ml/kg body weight.3,7

Persistent hemolysis and or failure of platelet count improvement within 4-5 days after plasmatherpay is indication of failure of treatment hence should be stopped immediately, and start eculizumab it.4

Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management is a key component of HUS treatment. Dehydrated patients should be given appropriate fluid replacement, however excessive fluid overload should be avoided especially with patients developing oliguria. Hyponatremia occurs in renal injury hence it corrected carefully by hypertonic saline. Other electrolyte abnormalities (hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia) in initially managed medically, if severity persist dialysis and hemofiltration may be required. HUS patient with high catabolic rate is managed by giving carbohydrate’s and amino acid. If hemoglobin reduces below 6g/dl prbc transfusion is recommended. 2

Some patients with delayed diagnosis or irresponsive to therapy progress to ESRD. Renal replacement is done is such cases. Posttransplant HUS occurs in four clinical contexts that are inherited HUS, idiopathic HUS, de novo occurrence of HUS after renal transplant. Eculizumab is also used prophylactically to prevent reoccurrence of HUS after renal transplantation.2,4,

Case report:

A 7 yrs old male patient admitted in pediatric medicine department Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute (KMCRI) Hubballi, on 22 april 2026

Chief complaints:

This patient was referred from his native  government hospital i/v/o vomiting, fever, headache, periorbital puffiness since 4 days, With h/o hematuria

Physical examination:

Pallor - +ve, Icterus - +ve, clubbing - -ve, cyanosis - -ve, lympedenopathy - -ve, edema - -ve.

Vital parameters:

Table : 1 Vital parameters:

Temperature

37.5 oc

Pulse rate

120bpm

Respiratory rate

26cpm

blood pressure

120/70mmHg

SpO2

99%

                     

Anthropometry:

Anthropometry assessment revealed weight, height, BMI and other parameters were appropriate for age, gender with no evidence of malnutrition

 

 

 

Table : 2 Systemic examination:

Cardiovascular system

Pericardium normal, normal heart sound with no murmur

Respiratory system

NVBS +ve, A/E - +ve

Central nervous system

Conscious oriented, HMF intact,

Per abdomen

Tenderness present in right upper quadrant, bowel sound +ve

 

Table : 3 Neurological examination:

 

Upper limb

Lower limb

 

Right

Left

Right

Left

Muscle

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Power

4/5+

4/5+

4/5+

4/5+

Tone

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Reflex

2+

2+

2+

2+

 

Table : 4 Hematological report:

Parameter

21/04/2026

26/04/2026

1/05/2026

10/05/2026

Normal value

Hemoglobin

6.3

8.3

8

9.3

12-15g/dl

WBC

10400

9030

4450

4840

5000-13000/ul

Lymphocytes

42.9

41.9

51.3

58.6

28-48%

Neutrophils

53

40.2

27.4

3.0

33-72%

PCV

18.0

-

23.9

27.6

35-50%

MCV

77.8

-

-

89.0

77- 95fl

MCH

27.3

-

-

30.0

25-33pg

MCHC

35.1

-

-

33.7

31-37%

PLT

0.32

0.43

 

1.55

1.7-4.5lakhs/cmm

S. urea

178.0

124.0

121.0

48.2

15- 45 mg/dl

S. creatinine

4.7

4.3

3.2

1.0

0.7-1.3mg/dl

S. Sodium

132.9

127.6

140.1

138.5

135-145mmol/l

S. Potassium

3.5

3.7

3.7

3.9

3.5-5.0mmol/l

S. Chloride

99.6

95.9

88.8

105.2

98-107mmol/l

LDH

3357.0

-

-

-

142-270U/L

Rc

30

 

 

 

2-6%

ASLO

negative

 

 

 

0-200IU/ml

 

Peripheral smear report:

RBC- microcytic hypochromic with macroovulocytes with few nucleated RBC’s and good number of acanthocytes.

Impression:

Microcytic hypochromic anemia with relative lymphocytosis and thrombocytopenia.

 

 

 

 

Table : 5 LFT:

Parameter

Observed value

Normal value

Total bilirubin

1.4

0.3-1.2mg/dl

Direct bilirubin

0.2

0.03-0.18mg/dl

Indirect bilirubin

1.20

0.75mg/dl

Total protein

6.0

6-8.3g/dl

Serum albumin

3.0

3.5-5.0g/dl

Serum globulin

3

2.3-3.5g/dl

A/G ratio

1

1-2.5

AST

172.0

Upto 35U/L

ALT

52.1

Upto 45U/L

ALP

7.0

54 – 369U/L

 

Table : 6 Arterial blood gas analysis:

pH

7.45

7.35 – 7.45mmol/l

pCO2

23

35-45mmhg

PO2

34

80-100mmhg

HCO3

16

22-30mmol/l

TCO2

16.7

19-24mmol/l

BEecf

-8.0

-3 -  7 mmol/l

 

Urine routine analysis:

 

Table : 7 Chemical examination:

Urine glucose

nil

Absent

Urine protein

present

Absent

 

Table : 8 Microscopic examination:

parameter

result

Reference range

Pus cells (wbc’s)

2-4

0-5

RBC

1-2

0-2

 

Urine culture and sensitivity test: no growth

Stool culture and sensitivity test: no enteric bacterial pathogen isolated

Ultrasonography reports:

-mild hepatosplenomegaly with increased echotexture of liver

-b/l kidney- bulky with increased echotexture and loss of CMD- likely s/o renal parenchymal diseases with RI values less than 0.8

-wedge shaped hypodensity seen in upper poles of right kidney? infract

-minimal interbowel loop fluid.

The patient was diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic(aHUS) syndrome. The patient underwent a detailed clinical examination including assessment of vital signs, systemic examination, physical examination, neurological examination, peripheral blood smear, hematological investigations, routine urinalysis, ASLO test, USG of abdomen, urine and stool culture and sensitivity test. The vital signs and anthropometry were normal, on physical examination pallor and icterus was seen. In systemic examination the tenderness was present in right upper quadrant, neurological examination showed mild weakness with normal reflexes. The low hemoglobin level with marked LDH and peripheral blood smear raised suspicion of hemolytic anemia. Whereas elevated urea, creatinine, abnormal LFT and USG report demonstrated significant renal involvement, the arterial blood gas investigation showed metabolic acidosis these findings were considered supportive of the patient systemic and renal dysfunction. In view of the combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a thrombotic microangiopathy was suspected. HUS was considered as differential diagnosis. Urine and stool culture sensitivity and ASLO test were negative for an infectious etiology making typical HUS less likely. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA. For treatment four sessions of dialysis were performed to manage AKI and patient developed severe HTN after first dialysis hence he was treated with tablet nefidipine and later titrated and shifted to tablet amlodipine when BP subsequently shows decreasing trends. plasmapheresis was done to which patient responded well hence continued the same treatment. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were given as supportive therapy.

 

 

Table : 9 Treatment chart:

SI NO

Drug

Dose

ROA

Frequency

Days given

01

Allowed orally

 

 

 

 

02

T. paracetamol

500mg

PO

SOS

 

03

Inj. Ranitidine

0.5cc

IV

BID

4days then stopped

04

Inj. emeset

2mg

IV

SOS

4days then stopped

05

T. Nifedipine

5mg

PO

BD

On 4th day

06

T. Nifedipine

2.5mg

PO

BD

From 5th – 11th  day

07

Inj. pantoprazole

20mg

IV

OD

From 5th day

08

Syp. Calcium

5ml

PO

TID

From 6th day

09

Syp. multivitamin

5ml

PO

BID

From 6th day

10

T. Nifedipine

2.5mg

PO

TID

From 12th- 15th day

11

Syp.potklor

2ml

PO

QID

On 13th day

12

T. Amlodipine

10mg

PO

HS

From 16th  day

 

Dialysis –4 cycles done on 23/4/26, 25/04/2026, 29/04/2026, 30/04/2026

After first dialysis patient developed BP hence titrated with nifedipine.

Plasmapheresis – 4 cycles done.

DISCUSSION

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is rare life threatening TMA with a characteristic triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathy hemolytic anemia and renal impairment. Atypical HUS is mainly associated with dysregulation of complementary pathways unlike typical HUS.5

Differential diagnosis:

The differential diagnosis for aHUS were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA. The combination of anemia, thrombocytopenia, biochemical evidence of hemolysis (elevated LDH, indirect bilirubin, reticulocyte count) and renal dysfunction, a TMA was suspected. However, ASLO test and antimicrobial test were negative, and the absence of diarrhea which exclude it from typical HUS. Clinical assessment and marked renal dysfunction favours a HUS over TTP. The clinical presentation, laboratory evidence of TMA and predominant renal involvement subsequently supported the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome after exclusion of other causes of TMA.

The key management strategy for aHUS is plasmapheresis following which patient’s hemoglobin, platelet were increasing gradually, dialysis was performed to reverse AKI and HTN was managed by nifedipine titration which was then switched to amlodipine. Other medications such as paracetamol, emeset, calcium, multivitamins, were administrated as supportive therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sever patients with aHUS progress to ESRD hence early diagnosis and proper differentiation from TTP, typical HUS/ STEC – HUS and secondary TMA is very important for proper management of a HUS. Identification of complentary abnormality helps to accurately manage aHUS. In this case timely initiation of plasma exchange, dialysis along with supportive treatment resulted in gradual improvement. There are other evolving approaches for the management of a HUS which shows promising results such as anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, eculizumab. Thus early recognition, accurate diagnosis and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy are important for preventing disease progression and improving long term patient outcome.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Director and the Head of the Department of Pediatrics at KMCRI (Karnataka Institute of Medical College and Research Institute), Hubballi, for their invaluable support, guidance, and for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this work. Special thanks are also extended to the President of Soniya education trust’s , Dharwad, for his encouragement and for fostering an environment conducive to academic excellence and research. Special Gratitude to our beloved parents for unconditional support throughout the journey.

REFERENCES

  1. Yoshida Y, Kato H, Ikeda Y, Nangaku M. Pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):99-110.
  2. Kaplan BS, Meyers KE, Schulman SL. The pathogenesis and treatment of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1998 Jun 1;9(6):1126-33.
  3. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic–uremic syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1676-87.
  4. Nester CM, Thomas CP. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: what is it, how is it diagnosed, and how is it treated?. Hematology 2010, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book. 2012 Dec 8;2012(1):617-25.
  5. Corrigan Jr JJ, Boineau FG. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Pediatrics in Review. 2001 Nov 1;22(11):365-9.
  6. Zuber J, Le Quintrec M, Sberro-Soussan R, Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Legendre C. New insights into postrenal transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2011 Jan;7(1):23-35.
  7. Loirat C, Garnier A, Sellier-Leclerc AL, Kwon T. Plasmatherapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2010 Sep (Vol. 36, No. 06, pp. 673-681). © Thieme Medical Publishers.
  8. de Córdoba SR, Hidalgo MS, Pinto S, Tortajada A. Genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2014 Jun (Vol. 40, No. 04, pp. 422-430). Thieme Medical Publishers.
  9. Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in immunopathology 2014 Jul (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 399-420). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Reference

  1. Yoshida Y, Kato H, Ikeda Y, Nangaku M. Pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):99-110.
  2. Kaplan BS, Meyers KE, Schulman SL. The pathogenesis and treatment of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1998 Jun 1;9(6):1126-33.
  3. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic–uremic syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1676-87.
  4. Nester CM, Thomas CP. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: what is it, how is it diagnosed, and how is it treated?. Hematology 2010, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book. 2012 Dec 8;2012(1):617-25.
  5. Corrigan Jr JJ, Boineau FG. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Pediatrics in Review. 2001 Nov 1;22(11):365-9.
  6. Zuber J, Le Quintrec M, Sberro-Soussan R, Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Legendre C. New insights into postrenal transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2011 Jan;7(1):23-35.
  7. Loirat C, Garnier A, Sellier-Leclerc AL, Kwon T. Plasmatherapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2010 Sep (Vol. 36, No. 06, pp. 673-681). © Thieme Medical Publishers.
  8. de Córdoba SR, Hidalgo MS, Pinto S, Tortajada A. Genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2014 Jun (Vol. 40, No. 04, pp. 422-430). Thieme Medical Publishers.
  9. Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in immunopathology 2014 Jul (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 399-420). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Photo
Varun Mathapati
Corresponding author

Soniya education trusts college of pharmacy dharwad

Photo
Afifa Bidari
Co-author

Soniya education trusts college of pharmacy dharwad

Photo
Siddappa Dandanavar
Co-author

Department of Pediatrics , Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubuli-580021

Photo
Chetan savant
Co-author

Soniya education trusts college of pharmacy dharwad

Photo
V H Kulkarni
Co-author

Sets college of pharmacy dharwad

Photo
Akanksha Badiger
Co-author

Soniya education trusts college of pharmacy dharwad

Afifa. Bidari, Siddappa Dandanavar, Varun Mathapati, Chetan Savant, V H Kulkarni, Akanksha Badiger, Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (Ahus) Syndrome With Kidney Injury In Pediatric Patient : A Case Report, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 9, 2878-2884, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22915073

Related Articles
Preparation And Evaluation of Herbal Ointment Using ACACIA NILOTICA Bark Extract...
C. Saranya, S. Vijayaragavan, J. Poovizhi, R. Perumal, G. Mouriya, S. Harini...
Rivaroxaban Vs. Apixaban After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Head-To-Head Pharmac...
Dr. S. Sathyamoorthi, C. Rifa Sidhik Fathima, B. Rashmi Avanticaa, R. Preethi, A. Prathap...
Comparison of Medication Adherence Assessment Tools in Patients: A Review...
Anupama Harigal, Madhura R, Kumari Muskan, K Lakshmi, Harshitha R...