View Article

Abstract

The Present Study Focused On Developing And Optimizing Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Of Gliclazide Using The Natural Polymer Grewia Gum To Enhance Bioavailability And Bypass First-Pass Metabolism. The Objectives Were To Formulate Patches With Varying Polymer Compositions, Evaluate Their Physicochemical And Mechanical Properties, And Assess In Vitro Drug Release, Swelling Behavior, And Ex Vivo Permeation. Grewia Gum Was Chosen Due To Its Natural Origin, Biocompatibility, And Excellent Swelling And Mucoadhesive Properties, Making It Ideal For Controlled Buccal Drug Delivery.Buccal Patches Were Prepared By The Solvent Casting Method Using Varying Ratios Of Grewia Gum Alone And Combined With Polymers Such As HPMC And Carbopol, Along With Suitable Plasticizers. Compatibility Studies Confirmed No Drug–Excipient Interactions. The Patches Were Evaluated For Thickness, Weight Variation, Folding Endurance, Surface Ph, Drug Content Uniformity, Tensile Strength, And Mucoadhesive Strength.Swelling Index And Ex Vivo Permeation Studies Assessed Hydration Behavior And Drug Diffusion Across Buccal Mucosa. The Optimized Batch Showed Ideal Physicochemical Properties, Satisfactory Mechanical Strength, And A Surface Ph Near Neutrality For Patient Acceptability. It Exhibited A Balanced Swelling Profile, Strong Mucoadhesion, And The Highest Drug Permeation Among Formulations.In Vitro Drug Release Demonstrated A Sustained Release Pattern Governed Predominantly By A Non-Fickian Diffusion Mechanism. Stability Studies Confirmed The Optimized Patch Remained Stable With No Significant Changes In Drug Content Or Release Profile.In Conclusion, Grewia Gum Significantly Enhanced The Performance Of Gliclazide Buccal Patches, Highlighting Its Potential As An Effective Natural Polymer For Controlled Drug Delivery. The Optimized Formulation Presents A Promising Alternative To Conventional Dosage Forms, Improving Therapeutic Efficacy And Patient Compliance In Diabetes Management

Keywords

Gliclazide; Mucoadhesive Buccal Patch; Grewia Gum; Natural Polymer; Buccal Drug Delivery; Sustained Release; Solvent Casting Method; Mucoadhesion; Drug Release; Antidiabetic Therapy

Introduction

× Popup Image

The Oral Route Is The Most Common Method For Drug Administration, Accounting For Nearly 60% Of Marketed Dosage Forms, Primarily Oral Solids. Despite Its Advantages, Challenges Such As Reduced Bioavailability, Slow Onset, And Swallowing Difficulties Have Increased The Use Of Parenteral And Liquid Formulations. Liquid Orals (E.G., Syrups, Suspensions) Help Some Patients But Often Have Dosing Inaccuracies, While Parenteral Routes Can Cause Pain.

Swallowing Difficulties Affect Specific Groups Like Children, Elderly, And Travelers Without Water Access, Causing Low Compliance. This Has Driven The Development Of Fast-Dissolving Dosage Forms, Which Rapidly Disintegrate In The Mouth Without Water, Offering A Convenient Alternative.

Many Orally Administered Drugs Undergo Significant First-Pass Metabolism, Reducing Bioavailability. These Limitations Have Spurred The Growth Of Fast Dissolving Drug Delivery Systems Since The Late 1970s As Substitutes For Conventional Tablets.

Mucosal Drug Delivery Through The Buccal Route Is Gaining Attention For Improving Safety And Therapeutic Effectiveness For Both Local And Systemic Conditions. Buccal Mucoadhesive Systems Use Water-Soluble Polymers With Mucoadhesive Properties To Adhere To Moist Tissues, Avoiding Drawbacks Of The Sublingual Route Such As Unpleasant Taste, Drug Dilution By Saliva, Odor, And Local Anesthetic Effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Solvent Casting Method

2.1.1. Preparation Of Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches By Solvent Casting Method

Materials:

The Following Materials Collected For The Experimental Work Done.

 

Table 1: List Of Materials

SR.NO.

DRUG/EXCIPIENTS

GRADE

1

Gliclazide

AR

2

HPMC

AR

3

Carbopol934p

AR

4

Na Alginate

AR

5

Polivinyl Alcohol

AR

6

Eudragitl-100

AR

7

Tween 80

AR

 

Table 2: Natural Polymer List

Sr No.

POLYMER

ISOLATEDFROM

BOTANICALNAME

FAMILY

1

Grewia Gum

Bark

Grewia Mollis

Malvaceae

 

  • The Buccal Patches Were Formulated Using The Solvent Casting Method. The Required Quantity Of Polymer Was Gradually Added And Dissolved In Distilled Water With Thorough Mixing. The Drug Was Then Dissolved In This Polymer Solution In Small Amounts. A Plasticizer Was Added To The Mixture And Mixed Well. The Resulting Solution Was Poured Into Petri Dishes And Dried In A Hot Air Oven At 40°C. After Drying, The Patches Were Carefully Removed Using A Sharp Blade, Stored In A Desiccator For 24 Hours, And Then Cut Into Pieces Of The Desired Shape And Size.

  

 

Table 3: Composition Of Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Of Gliclazide

Formulation

Gliclazide (Mg)

Grewia Gum (Mg)

HPMC K15M (Mg)

Carbopol 934P (Mg)

Eudragit RL-100 (Mg)

Propylene Glycol (%)

Distilled Water (Ml)

F1

82.00

350

100

50

10

40

F2

82.00

400

150

50

10

40

F3

82.00

450

200

50

10

40

F4

82.00

350

50

100

10

40

F5

82.00

400

50

150

10

40

F6

82.00

450

50

200

10

40

F7

82.00

400

100

50

100

10

40

F8

82.00

400

150

50

50

10

40

F9

82.00

400

200

50

100

10

40

F10

82.00

400

200

50

50

10

40

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Evaluation Of Physicochemical Properties Of Grewia Gum Powder:

The Extracted Grewia Gum Showed Suitable Organoleptic And Physicochemical Properties For Use In Gliclazide Buccal Patches. Organoleptically, The Gum Was A Light Brown, Fine, Free-Flowing Powder With No Characteristic Odor And A Bland, Mucilaginous Taste, Indicating Good Patient Acceptability For Buccal Use.

The Solubility Profile Demonstrated That Grewia Gum Is Insoluble In Organic Solvents Like Ethanol, Acetone, And Chloroform, But Forms A Viscous Colloidal Dispersion In Water And Hydrates Completely In Hot Water To Produce A Thick Mucilage, Confirming Its Hydrophilic Nature.

The Ph Of The Dispersion Ranged From 6.2 To 6.4, Near Neutral, Ensuring Compatibility With Buccal Mucosa And Reducing The Risk Of Irritation.

                

 

Table 4: Organoleptic Properties Of Isolated Grewia Gum Powder

Organoleptic Properties

Color

Light Brown Powder

Odor

Odorless

Taste

Bland, Mucilaginous

Appearance

Fine, Free-Flowing Powder

Solubility Behavior

Solubility In Water

Forms Viscous Colloidal Dispersion

Solubility In Hot Water

Completely Hydrates Forming Thick Mucilage

Solubility In Ethanol (95%)

Insoluble

Solubility In Acetone

Insoluble

Solubility In Chloroform

Insoluble

Ph (1% W/V Dispersion)

6.2

 

From A Physicochemical Perspective, Grewia Gum Exhibited A Moderate Yield (14.5%) And Acceptable Moisture Content (7.8%), Indicating Good Stability. Its Swelling Index (285%) And Viscosity (410 Cps) Demonstrate Excellent Water Uptake And Gel-Forming Ability, Essential For Mucoadhesion And Controlled Drug Release In Buccal Patches. This Enables The Formation Of A Hydrated Three-Dimensional Network From Which The Drug Can Efficiently Diffuse.

The Gum’s Hygroscopic Nature—Its Ability To Absorb Moisture—Was Assessed, As Excessive Hygroscopicity Can Alter Dosage Form Properties. Flow Properties Were Evaluated By:

  • Bulk Density: 0.52 G/Ml
  • Tapped Density: 0.67 G/Ml
  • Carr’s Index: 22.4%
  • Hausner Ratio: 1.29

These Indicate Passable Flow Characteristics, Suitable For Uniform Casting Of Patches.

Additionally, The Ash Value (3.1%) Indicates Low Inorganic Impurities, While Loss On Drying (8.2%) Reflects Acceptable Residual Moisture.

Overall, These Properties Confirm Grewia Gum As A Promising Natural Polymer For Buccal Patch Formulation, Offering Desirable Swelling, Adhesion, And Film-Forming Characteristics.

 

Table 5 : Physicochemical Properties Of Isolated Grewia Gum Powder

Physicochemical Properties

Yield (%)

14.5%

Moisture Content (%)

7.8%

Ash Value (%)

3.1%

Swelling Index (%)

285%

Viscosity (1% Solution, Cps)

410 Cps

Bulk Density (G/Ml)

0.52 G/Ml

Tapped Density (G/Ml)

0.67 G/Ml

Carr’s Index (%)

22.4%

Hausner Ratio

1.29

Ph Of Mucilage

6.4

Loss On Drying (%)

8.2%

 

CALIBRATION DATA :

The Calibration Graph Exhibited A Straight-Line Relationship With A Correlation Coefficient (R² ≈ 0.9998), Demonstrating Strong Linearity And Confirming The Method's Suitability For Quantitative Analysis Of Gliclazide In Formulation Studies. This Calibration Curve Can Reliably Determine Unknown Gliclazide Concentrations In Subsequent Analyses.

                             

 

Table 6 : Calibration Data Of Gliclazide In Phosphate Buffer Ph 7.4

Conc (µg/Ml)

Absorbance At 229 Nm (A)

0

0

2.0

0.1023

4.0

0.2017

6.0

0.3105

8.0

0.4034

10.0

0.5039

12.0

0.6008

16.0

0.8013

 

Regression (Linear Fit Of Absorbance Vs Concentration):

Y = 0.05x + 0.0031
R² = 0.9998

Where Y = Absorbance, X = Concentration (µg/Ml)

Correlation Coefficient: R² = 0.9998

Standard Deviation Of Residuals (Sy/X): 0.0031

 

 

 

Figure 1: Calibration Curve Of Gliclazide In Buffer Ph 7.4

 

FT-IR Studies :-

The Spectral Data Showed That The Major Drug Peaks Appeared At Similar Values Across All Physical Mixtures Of The Drug And Polymers, With No Significant Changes In IR Peaks. This Indicates That The Drug Is Molecularly Dispersed Within The Polymers Or Drug-Loaded Formulations, Confirming The Absence Of Any Interactions Between The Drug And Polymers.

 

 

 

Figure 2: FTIR Graph For Gliclazide

 

 

Figure 3: FTIR Graph For Gliclazide With Polymer Mixture

 

The FTIR Spectrum Of Pure Gliclazide Shows Characteristic Peaks Corresponding To Its Functional Groups. A Prominent Absorption Band Near 3300 Cm⁻¹ Is Attributed To N–H Stretching Of The Sulfonylurea Moiety. A Strong Peak Around 1700 Cm⁻¹ Indicates C=O Stretching Of The Amide Group. Peaks Between 1150–1350 Cm⁻¹ Correspond To S=O Stretching Vibrations Of The Sulfonyl Group. Additionally, Peaks Near 1600 Cm⁻¹ Arise From Aromatic C=C Stretching, Confirming The Drug’s Structural Integrity As Per Official Values.

PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF DRUG :-

The Organoleptic Evaluation Of Gliclazide Revealed That It Is A White To Off-White, Fine Powder With A Bitter Taste And No Significant Odor, Which Is Typical Of Sulfonylurea Drugs.  

 

Table 7: Organoleptic Properties Of Gliclazide

Parameter

Observation

Physical State

Fine Powder

Colour

White To Off-White Fine Powder

Odour

Odourless To Slightly Characteristic

Taste

Slightly Bitter

 

SOLUBILITY STUDY:
Gliclazide Is Practically Insoluble In Water But Exhibits Better Solubility In Organic Solvents Like Acetone And Chloroform, With Limited Solubility In Alcohol And Buffer Media. This Poor Aqueous Solubility Underscores The Need For Formulation Strategies Such As Buccal Patches Or Controlled-Release Systems To Improve Its Dissolution And Bioavailability.

 

Table 8:  Solubility Gliclazide In Various Solvents

Solvent

Solubility

Water

Practically Insoluble

Methanol

Slightly Soluble

Ethanol (95%)

Sparingly Soluble

Acetone

Freely Soluble

Chloroform

Soluble

0.1 N Hcl

Slightly Soluble

Phosphate Buffer Ph 6.8

Slightly Soluble

 

EVALUATION OF MUCOADHESIVE BUCCAL PATCHES OF GLICLAZIDE :-

Evaluating Buccal Patches Is Essential To Ensure Quality, Performance, And Patient Acceptability Of Gliclazide Formulations. The Assessment Focuses On Physicochemical, Mechanical, And Surface Properties That Affect Drug Release, Mucoadhesion, And Stability.

Key Evaluation Parameters Include:

  • Weight Variation And Thickness To Ensure Uniform Drug Distribution And Consistency In Casting
  • Folding Endurance To Assess Mechanical Strength And Flexibility
  • Surface Ph To Confirm Compatibility With Buccal Mucosa And Prevent Irritation

Systematic Evaluation Of These Parameters Aids In Optimizing The Formulation, Ensuring Reproducibility, And Selecting The Best Buccal Patch For Effective Drug Delivery.

PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AND SURFACE TEXTURE OF PATCHES:

These Parameters Were Checked Simply With Visual Inspection Of Patches And By Feel Or Touch. The Observation Reveals That The Patches Are Having Smooth Surface And They Are Elegant In Appearance.

 

Table 9: Physical Evaluation Of Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Of Gliclazide

Formulation

Average Weight (Mg)

Thickness (Mm)

Folding Endurance

Surface Ph

F1

35.66±1.15

0.53±0.05

252.33±3.51

6.30±0.05

F2

36.66±0.57

0.55±0.05

260.00±1.00

6.13±0.05

F3

40.33±1.15

0.56±0.05

267.66±3.51

5.56±0.11

F4

26.00±1.73

0.51±0.01

224.33±2.08

6.26±0.05

F5

29.66±1.15

0.54±0.05

225.33±4.50

6.40±0.35

F6

32.33±1.15

0.53±0.05

245.66±2.08

5.71±0.37

F7

30.66±1.52

0.52±0.01

230.33±2.64

6.33±0.26

F8

32.26±1.52

0.53±0.05

246.00±1.95

5.62±0.15

F9

36.66±0.57

0.55±0.05

269.66±2.00

6.48±0.20

F10

36.26±1.52

0.55±0.05

266.00±1.95

5.76±0.20

 

EVALUATION OF BUCCAL PATCHES  :-

  • Weight Uniformity:
    The Patches’ Weights Ranged From 26.00 Mg To 40.33 Mg, Indicating Acceptable Uniformity.
    • Formulations F1–F3 Had Higher Weights Due To Increased Grewia Gum And HPMC K15M Concentrations.
    • F4–F6 Showed Lower Weights Because Of Eudragit RL-100, Which Is Less Hydrophilic With Lower Bulk Density.
    • Triple Polymer Systems (F7–F10) Had Intermediate Weights Reflecting Balanced Polymer Compositions.
  • Thickness:
    Thickness Ranged From 0.51 Mm To 0.56 Mm, Showing Minimal Variation And Uniform Casting.
    • Slightly Higher Thickness In F2, F3, F9, F10 Corresponded To Increased Polymer Concentration.
    • Lower Thickness In F4 Was Due To Reduced Hydrophilic Polymer And Presence Of Hydrophobic Eudragit.
  • Folding Endurance:
    Values Ranged From 224 To 269, Indicating Good Mechanical Strength And Flexibility.
    • Highest Folding Endurance (>265) Observed In F3, F9, F10, Attributed To Higher Polymer Concentration And Better Plasticization.
    • Lower Values In F4, F5 Likely Due To Rigidity From Higher Eudragit Content.

CONCLUSIONS

The Study Aimed To Develop And Optimize Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Of Gliclazide To Enhance Bioavailability And Bypass First-Pass Metabolism. Key Points Include:

  • Ten Formulations (F1–F10) Were Prepared Using Different Hydrophilic Polymers (HPMC, Carbopol, Grewia Gum) And Film-Forming Agents.
  • Polymer Ratio Significantly Influenced Physicochemical And Drug Release Properties.
  • Compatibility Studies Confirmed No Drug–Polymer Interactions.
  • All Patches Showed Acceptable Thickness, Weight Uniformity, Folding Endurance, Surface Ph (Near Neutral), And Drug Content Uniformity.
  • In Vitro Drug Release Demonstrated Controlled, Sustained Release Influenced By Polymer Composition.
  • Swelling Studies Showed Increased Swelling With Higher Hydrophilic Polymer Content, Enhancing Mucoadhesion And Drug Diffusion.
  • Ex Vivo Permeation Confirmed Effective Drug Permeation; Optimized Formulations Showed Higher Permeation Due To Balanced Swelling And Matrix Integrity.
  • Stability Studies Under Accelerated Conditions Indicated No Significant Changes In Drug Content Or Release Profile.

The F8 Formulation Was Identified As The Optimized Batch, Showing:

  • Highest Controlled Drug Permeation (71.40% Over 12 Hours)
  • Balanced Hydrophilic (Grewia Gum, HPMC K15M) And Hydrophobic (Eudragit RL-100) Polymers Forming A Well-Structured Matrix
  • Sustained Therapeutic Action Suitable For Buccal Delivery

The Drug Release Mechanism Was Predominantly Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport, Governed By Diffusion And Polymer Relaxation. Stability Results Confirmed Suitability For Long-Term Use.

Overall, The Study Demonstrated That Gliclazide Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Can Improve Therapeutic Efficacy And Bioavailability, Offering A Promising Alternative To Conventional Oral Dosage Forms.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Authors Are Grateful To The Management Of Noble Pharmacy College For Providing The Necessary Facilities And Support To Carry Out This Research Work. The Authors Would Like To Express Their Sincere Thanks To Dr. Sheetal Buddhadev Dr.Darshit Ram For Her Valuable Guidance, Encouragement, And Continuous Support Throughout The Research Work. The Authors Also Acknowledge All Teaching And Non-Teaching Staff For Their Cooperation And Assistance

REFERENCES

    1. Alagga, A. A. (2024). Drug Absorption. In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK557489/
    2. Padhye, T., Et Al. (2021). A Comprehensive Review Of The Strategies To Improve Oral Drug Absorption With Special Emphasis On The Cellular And Molecular Mechanisms. European Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ejps.2021.105921
    3. Sayed, O. M. (2024). Oral Mucosal Absorption: Mechanisms, Methods, And Challenges In Drug Delivery. Pharaoh Academy. Retrieved From Https://Pharaohacademy.Com/Oral-Mucosal-Absorption-Review
    4. Cheng, L., Et Al. (2020). Food Effects On Oral Drug Absorption. Pharmaceutics, 12(7), 631. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Pharmaceutics12070631
    5. Reddy, P. C. (2011). A Review On Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems. African Journal Of Pharmacy And Pharmacology, 5(20), 2237-2246. Https://Doi.Org/10.5897/AJPP11.131
    6. Alqahtani, M. S., Et Al. (2021). Advances In Oral Drug Delivery. Frontiers In Pharmacology, 12, 618411. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fphar.2021.618411
    7. Standring, S. (2023). Anatomy, Head And Neck, Oral Cavity (Mouth). In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Retrieved From Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK555959/
    8. Patel, S., & Kamath, V. (2024). Oral Cavity: Anatomy, Tongue Muscles, Nerves And Vessels. Kenhub. Retrieved From Https://Www.Kenhub.Com/En/Library/Anatomy/Oral-Cavity
    9. Brizuela, M., Et Al. (2023). Histology, Oral Mucosa. In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK557154/
    10. Wikipedia Contributors. (2005). Oral Mucosa. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 10, 2025, From Https://En.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Oral_Mucosa
    11. Martinez, M. N., & Amidon, G. L. (2002). A Mechanistic Approach To Understanding The Factors Affecting Drug Absorption: A Review Of Fundamentals. Journal Of Clinical Pharmacology, 42(6), 620-643. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00970002042006005
    12. Davis, S. S., & Hardy, J. G. (2023). Factors Affecting Drug Absorption And Distribution. In Pharmacokinetics (Pp. 55-72). Elsevier. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824068-7.00004-8
    13. Sun, C., & Lee, V. H. (2024). Oral Drug Absorption: Physicochemical, Physiological, And Formulation Factors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 115(3), 523-537. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cpt.3032
    14. Thakur, R. R., & Kumar, M. (2010). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery System: An Overview. Pharmaceutics, 2(2), 83-92. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Pmc/Articles/PMC3077973/
    15. Reddy, P. C. (2011). A Review On Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems. African Journal Of Pharmacy And Pharmacology, 5(20), 2237-2246. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Pmc/Articles/PMC3148614/

Reference

    1. Alagga, A. A. (2024). Drug Absorption. In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK557489/
    2. Padhye, T., Et Al. (2021). A Comprehensive Review Of The Strategies To Improve Oral Drug Absorption With Special Emphasis On The Cellular And Molecular Mechanisms. European Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ejps.2021.105921
    3. Sayed, O. M. (2024). Oral Mucosal Absorption: Mechanisms, Methods, And Challenges In Drug Delivery. Pharaoh Academy. Retrieved From Https://Pharaohacademy.Com/Oral-Mucosal-Absorption-Review
    4. Cheng, L., Et Al. (2020). Food Effects On Oral Drug Absorption. Pharmaceutics, 12(7), 631. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Pharmaceutics12070631
    5. Reddy, P. C. (2011). A Review On Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems. African Journal Of Pharmacy And Pharmacology, 5(20), 2237-2246. Https://Doi.Org/10.5897/AJPP11.131
    6. Alqahtani, M. S., Et Al. (2021). Advances In Oral Drug Delivery. Frontiers In Pharmacology, 12, 618411. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fphar.2021.618411
    7. Standring, S. (2023). Anatomy, Head And Neck, Oral Cavity (Mouth). In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Retrieved From Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK555959/
    8. Patel, S., & Kamath, V. (2024). Oral Cavity: Anatomy, Tongue Muscles, Nerves And Vessels. Kenhub. Retrieved From Https://Www.Kenhub.Com/En/Library/Anatomy/Oral-Cavity
    9. Brizuela, M., Et Al. (2023). Histology, Oral Mucosa. In Statpearls. Statpearls Publishing. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK557154/
    10. Wikipedia Contributors. (2005). Oral Mucosa. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 10, 2025, From Https://En.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Oral_Mucosa
    11. Martinez, M. N., & Amidon, G. L. (2002). A Mechanistic Approach To Understanding The Factors Affecting Drug Absorption: A Review Of Fundamentals. Journal Of Clinical Pharmacology, 42(6), 620-643. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00970002042006005
    12. Davis, S. S., & Hardy, J. G. (2023). Factors Affecting Drug Absorption And Distribution. In Pharmacokinetics (Pp. 55-72). Elsevier. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824068-7.00004-8
    13. Sun, C., & Lee, V. H. (2024). Oral Drug Absorption: Physicochemical, Physiological, And Formulation Factors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 115(3), 523-537. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cpt.3032
    14. Thakur, R. R., & Kumar, M. (2010). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery System: An Overview. Pharmaceutics, 2(2), 83-92. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Pmc/Articles/PMC3077973/
    15. Reddy, P. C. (2011). A Review On Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems. African Journal Of Pharmacy And Pharmacology, 5(20), 2237-2246. Https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Pmc/Articles/PMC3148614/

Photo
Dipak Parmar
Corresponding author

Department Of Pharmaceutics, Faculty Of Pharmacy - Noble University,Junagadh, Gujarat, India

Photo
Dr. Sheetal Buddhadev
Co-author

Noble University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Dr. Darshit Ram
Co-author

Noble University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Dr. Santosh Kirtane
Co-author

Noble University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Dipak Parmar, Dr. Sheetal Buddhadev, Dr. Darshit Ram, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, Design And Optimization Of Gliclazide Fast Dissolving Tablets Employing Grewia Gum As A Novel Natural Superdisintegrant For Improved Antidiabetic Therapy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 2742-2750, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20625004

More related articles
Pharmacological Evaluation of Emodine Against Isop...
Jasmin Rashid Bagwan , Dr. H. V. Kamble, Mujeeb Shaikh...
Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances ...
Bembde Mayuri, Namrata Shivankar, Sayyad Altaf, Rakshita Suryawan...
Comprehensive Review of Herbal Interventions in Bi...
Shubhangi Bhadane, Dr. Amol More, Sangita Bhandare, Dr. Kiran Kot...
Comprehensive Review of Antihypertensive Agents: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Guideli...
P.Haripriya, V.Harini, S.Shobhana, T.Madhan, A.Harikrishnan, K. Arun...
Virtual Articulators in Prosthodontics: A Narrative Review...
Sameeksha Savade, Mohd Siddiq Ansari, Shiv Kumar, Jitendra Khetan...
Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for Diabetes Management: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applic...
Sakthivel M, Vasanthkumar K, Varun S, Srisakthivani I, Shanmugavel S, Omprakash M, Thilagavathi S, D...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Cold Cream for Psoriasis...
Vishakha Borkar, Trupti Harne, Pradnya Chavan, Arpita Chopade, Namrata Chavan...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Hair Serum for Prevention of Premature Hair...
Ankita Hajgude, Renuka Sawale, Saloni Jadhav, Aaditya Ghorpade, Abhishek Jadhav, Snehal Gore...
Pharmacological Evaluation of Emodine Against Isoproterenol-Induced Cardiac Hype...
Jasmin Rashid Bagwan , Dr. H. V. Kamble, Mujeeb Shaikh...
More related articles
Pharmacological Evaluation of Emodine Against Isoproterenol-Induced Cardiac Hype...
Jasmin Rashid Bagwan , Dr. H. V. Kamble, Mujeeb Shaikh...
Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances And Future Perspectives...
Bembde Mayuri, Namrata Shivankar, Sayyad Altaf, Rakshita Suryawanshi...
Comprehensive Review of Herbal Interventions in Bile Duct Obstruction-Induced He...
Shubhangi Bhadane, Dr. Amol More, Sangita Bhandare, Dr. Kiran Kotade...
Pharmacological Evaluation of Emodine Against Isoproterenol-Induced Cardiac Hype...
Jasmin Rashid Bagwan , Dr. H. V. Kamble, Mujeeb Shaikh...
Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances And Future Perspectives...
Bembde Mayuri, Namrata Shivankar, Sayyad Altaf, Rakshita Suryawanshi...
Comprehensive Review of Herbal Interventions in Bile Duct Obstruction-Induced He...
Shubhangi Bhadane, Dr. Amol More, Sangita Bhandare, Dr. Kiran Kotade...