View Article

  • Design, Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin Loaded Nanosponges for the Treatment of Pneumonia

  • Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Abstract

Azithromycin is poorly water-soluble drug with a short half-life. Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges would be an alternative delivery system to a conventional oral formulation to improve its bioavailability. Azithromycin loaded nanosponges were prepared by emulsion solvent diffusion method by using Ethyl cellulose as a polymer, poly vinyl alcohol as a stabilizer and dichloromethane as a solvent. Two level factorial designs were used for the optimization of Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges. The prepared Nanosponges were evaluated for percentage yield, Entrapment Efficiency, Drug content, Particle size, In vitro drug release, Zeta potential. The spectrum FT-IR showed the stable character of Azithromycin in a mixture of polymers and revealed the absence of drug -polymer interactions. Scanning electron microscopic studies confirmed their porous structure of Nanosponges. The mean particle size and Z average of optimized formulation was found to be 183.5 nm. Poly diversity index and zeta potential of optimized formulation was found out to be 0.327 and -27.5 mV, indicating uniformity of particle size within formulation and the formulation is stable. The optimized Nanosponges were subjected to stability studies. The purpose of this research was to prepare Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges to improve the solubility, reduce dose dependent, side effects and improve the patient compliance.

Keywords

Nanosponges, two level factorial design, Azithromycin, Emulsion Solvent diffusion method, Release kinetics, In vitro drug release.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Nano sponges are mesh – like minute structures that can be encapsulate a large variety of substances and medication molecules and offers a promising solution. They are like a 3D network having a backbone of long chain polyesters present in the solution along with crosslinkers that connect different parts of the polymer. These materials minimize drug carrier size, enhancing the solubility and bioavailability of hydrophobic medications ultimately improving their therapeutic effectiveness. The sponges are self-sterilizing as their pore size is about 0.25 µm, where bacteria cannot penetrate. Nano sponges can be delivered through the lungs and veins because of their microscopic size. Nanosponge can circulate into the whole body and release the drug at a specific site in a controlled manner. These microscopic particles are capable carrying both the lipophilic and hydrophilic substances and of improving solubility of drug molecules [57]. Pneumonia is an inflammatory condition of the lung primarily affecting the small air sacs known as alveoli. The severity of the condition is variable. pneumonia caused by infection like influenza and Hemophilus influenzae leading to patchy consolidations, mainly in the right upper lobe (arrow). Risk factors for pneumonia include cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sickle cell disease, asthma, a poor ability to cough (stroke), and immunodeficiency. Pneumonia can affect one or both lungs. Pneumonia in both lungs is called bilateral or double pneumonia. The inflammation causes the alveoli to fill with fluid and pus, which can be a mixture of immune cells, dead tissue, and infectious agents. This fluid buildup significantly reduces the surface area available for oxygen to pass from the air into the bloodstream and for carbon dioxide to be removed [29]. Azithromycin is a widely used antibiotic belonging to the macrolide class. It is effective against a broad range of bacterial infections, particularly those affecting the respiratory tract, skin, ears, and genitals. Azithromycin is an acid stable drug that can be orally administered structurally related to erythromycin, with a similar spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Azithromycin appears to be more active than erythromycin against many Gram-negative pathogens and other specific pathogens, including Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, H. parainfluenza, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Borrelia burgdorferi [13]. Azithromycin binds to the 23S rRNA of the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit. It stops bacterial protein synthesis by inhibiting the transpeptidation/translocation step of protein synthesis and by inhibiting the assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit. This action in the control of various bacterial infections.  The strong affinity of macrolides, including azithromycin, for bacterial ribosomes, and highlights its consistent with their broad?spectrum antibacterial activities due to its strong affinity for macrolides. Azithromycin is highly stable at a low pH, contributes to a longer serum half-life and increasing its concentrations in tissues [11].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Azithromycin was gift sample from ATOZ Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai. Ethyl cellulose, Poly vinyl alcohol, Dichloromethane were purchased from Loba Chemie Private Limited, Mumbai.

METHODOLGY

DRUG-EXCIPIENT COMPATABILITY STUDY [34,19]

The drug and excipients selected for the formulation were evaluated for physical and chemical compatibility studies by using FT-IR.

SOLUBILTY STUDIES [19]

Solubility studies of Azithromycin were established by different solvent systems such as methanol and purified water as per the standard procedure.

DETERMINATION OF λ max

10 mg of Azithromycin was weighed and transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. The drug was dissolved and volume was made up to 100 ml using phosphate buffer pH 6.8 to obtain a stock solution of 1000 µg/ml (stock solution I). 1ml of this stock solution was again diluted with phosphate buffer pH6.8 up to 100 ml to obtain a solution of 100 µg/ml (Stock solution II). From stock solution-II, 1 ml was pipette out in 100 ml volumetric flask. The volume was made up to 100 ml using phosphate buffer pH 6.8 get a concentration of 10µg/ml. This solution was then scanned at 200-400 nm in UV-Visible spectrophotometer to attain the absorption maximum (λ max).

STANDARD CURVE FOR AZITHROMYCIN

Preparation of stock solution

500 mg of Azithromycin was weighed and transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. The drug was dissolved in 10 ml of methanol and volume was made up to 100ml using phosphate buffer pH 6.8 to obtain a stock solution of 1000 µg/ml (Stock solution I). 10 ml of this stock solution was again diluted with phosphate buffer pH 6.8 up to 100 ml to obtain a solution of 100µg/ml (Stock solution II). From stock solution II 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 ml were transferred to series of 100 ml volumetric flasks. The volume was made up with phosphate buffer pH 6.8. The absorbance of these solutions was measured at 250 nm against blank.

PREPARATION OF AZITHROMYCIN LOADED NANOSPONGES [23]

Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges were prepared by Emulsion solvent diffusion method. The polymer used in the formulation of Azithromycin loaded nanosponge is Ethyl cellulose.

External phase: Polyvinyl alcohol (0.4%-0.9%) in distilled water (50ml) was used as the aqueous phase.

Internal phase: Specified amount of drug and polymer was dissolved in an organic solvent dichloromethane(20ml) was used as dispersed phase (organic phase).

 PREPARATION PROCESS: Aqueous phase consists of specified amount of poly vinyl alcohol dissolved in 50 ml distilled water. Disperse phase was added drop by drop into aqueous phase by stirring on a magnetic stirrer at (1000-2000) rpm for about 2 hours to remove the solvent dichloromethane from the mixture. The nanosponges formed were collected by filtration and dried in an oven at 40ºC for about 24 hours to remove the residual solvent dichloromethane.

FORMULATION OF AZITHROMYCIN LOADED NANOSPONGES BY USING FACTORIAL DESIGN [27].

A Factorial design was developed to statistically optimize the      formulation factors and evaluate the main effects, interaction effects and linear effects on the independent factors. It was 3 factors, 2 levels factorial design was used to explore linear response surfaces with design expert software (version 13), and a matrix comprising 3 factors 2 levels and 8 runs is selected for optimization study. The experimental design is summarized in table 8.3.

Validation and data analysis

Statistical validation of the polynomial equation and ANOVA was calculated using Design Expert Software. The resultant experimental values of the responses were quantitatively compared with the predicted values to calculate the prediction error. Factorial Design was used for the optimization of Azithromycin loaded nanosponges formulation. The Ethyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol and Stirring speed were the three factors (independent variables) studied. The responses (dependent variables) studied were Percentage Entrapment efficiency and Percentage Drug release. 

Summary of Experimental design

Independent

Variable

Units

Level

Low (-1)

High (+1)

X1 = Ethyl cellulose

%w/v

0.9

1.5

X2 = PVA

%w/v

0.6

0.9

X3 = stirring speed

Rpm

1000

2000

 

Dependent variable

Units

Constraints

R1 = Entrapment Efficiency

%

Maximize

R2 = Drug Release

%

Maximize

PERCENTAGE YIELD [33,37]

The percentage yield (PY) can be determined by calculating initial weight of raw materials and final weight of nanosponges.

Percentage Yield= Practical weight of Nanosponge/ Theoretical mass*100       

DETERMINATION OF DRUG ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY

For the determination of drug entrapment, the nanosponge dispersion with known amount of drug was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant solution was separated. 5ml of supernatant was distributed with 100 ml of phosphate buffer solution pH 6.8 and the absorbance was measured using UV-Visible spectrophotometer at 210 nm using of phosphate buffer solution pH 6.8 as blank. The amount of drug un entrapped was calculated. The percentage of entrapment efficiency was determined according to the following equation given below.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) = Total amount of drug – Amount of unbound drug/ Total amount of drug*100.

DRUG CONTENT DETERMINATION

Equivalent to 100 mg of the prepared formulation were weighed and dissolved in minimum quantity of ethanol and made up to 100 ml with phosphate buffer pH 6.8. The solution kept for 24 hours and filtered to separate fragments. Drug content was analyzed after suitable dilution by UV- Visible spectrophotometer at a wave length 210 nm against phosphate buffer pH 6.8 as blank. From the absorbance the drug content in the batches were calculated.

SOLUBILITY DETERMINATION OF OPTIMIZED AZITHROMYCIN NANOSPONGES

Solubility of the Azithromycin loaded Nanosponge formulation were tested in various medium (distilled water and phosphate buffer pH 6.8) by adding an excess amount of formulations. The mixtures were stirred in a mechanical shaker at speed 50 rpm for 24 hours at room temperature. Visual inspection was carefully made to ensure that there were excess Azithromycin solids in the mixture, indicating saturation had been reached. Then the mixtures were filtered using 0.45µm filter and filtrates were suitably diluted with same media. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 210 nm in UV-Visible spectrophotometer.

IN VITRO DRUG RELEASE STUDIES

The in vitro release of Azithromycin from Nanosponges was evaluated using USP Type-I (Basket) dissolution test apparatus. Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges were filled in capsule and placed in a dissolution jar containing 900ml of Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 as dissolution medium maintained at 37±0.50C and rotated at 50 rpm. 5ml of samples were withdrawn at predetermined intervals up to 8 hrs and replaced with equal amount phosphate buffer pH 6.8 for further dissolution testing. The absorbance was determined spectrophotometrically at 210nm.

MORPHOLOGY OF NANOSPONGE BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

SEM analysis is significant for determination of surface characteristics and size of the particle. Scanning electron microscopy was operated at an acceleration voltage of 15kV. A concentrated aqueous suspension was spread in an equipment cell receiver and dried under vacuum. The sample was shadowed in a gold layer 20 mm thickened cathodic evaporator attached with a monitor which represents the images of the sample. The processed images were recorded and individual formulated Nanosponges particle diameter was measured to obtain average particle size.

PARTICLE SIZE AND POLYDISPERSITY INDEX

Particle size (z-average diameter) and polydispersity index (as a measure of particle size distribution) of Azithromycin loaded Nanosponge dispersion is performed by dynamic light scattering also known as photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) using a Malvern Zetasizer 3000 nano S (Malvern Instruments, UK) at 25°C.

ZETA POTENTIAL

Zeta potential measurements were also made using an additional electrode in the same instrument. For zeta potential determination, 1ml of sample of Azithromycin suspension was filled in clear disposable zeta cell, without air bubble within the sample, the system was set at 25?C temperature, an electric field of about 15 V/cm and results was recorded. The more negative zeta potential, more stable the nanosponge preparation.

PREFORMULATION STUDY OF OPTIMIZED NANOSPONGES [19]

FLOW PROPERTY MEASUREMENTS

The flow properties of powders are critical for an efficient tableting and capsule filling operation. A good flow of the powder or granules is necessary to assure efficient mixing and acceptable weight uniformity for the compressed tablets and capsules. The flow property measurements include bulk density, tapped density, angle of repose, compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio. The flow properties of Nanosponges were determined.

RELEASE KINETICS OF THE OPTIMIZED FORMULATIONS [52]

To study the in vitro release kinetics of the optimized formulation, data obtained from dissolution study were plotted in various kinetics models.

Different kinetic models such as zero order (cumulative amount of drug released vs. time), first order (log cumulative percentage of drug remaining vs. time), Higuchi model (cumulative percentage of drug released vs. square root of time), Korsmeyer-Peppas model (Log Cumulative percent drug release versus log time) and Hixson Crowell model (cube root of log cumulative percentage of drug remaining vs. log time) were applied to interpret the drug release kinetics from the formulations. Based on the highest regression values for correlation coefficients for formulations, the best?fit model was decided

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

FT- IR

The peak observed in the FT-IR spectrum of Drug, Ethyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol showed no shift and no disappearance of the characteristic peaks of drug. This suggests that there is no interaction between the drug and the excipients.

DETERMINATION OF λ MAX FOR AZITHROMYCIN.

The maximum absorbance of the Azithromycin was studied. The maximum absorbance of the drug Azithromycin was found to be 210 nm. Hence the wavelength of 210 nm. was selected for analysis of drug in dissolution media.

STANDARD CALIBRATION CURVE OF AZITHROMYCIN IN 0.1N HCL AND PHOSPHATE BUFFER PH 6.8

The Ultraviolet Spectrophotometric method was used to analyze the calibration curve of Azithromycin. The absorbance of the drug in of concentration ranging from 5-25 µg/ml was measured at a wavelength of 210 nm against blank A calibration curve was plotted for Azithromycin in 0.1N HCl and pH 6.8 buffers in the range of 5-25 µg/mL (Beer’s Lambert’s range) at 210 nm respectively. A good linear relationship was observed between the concentration of Azithromycin and its absorbance in 0.1N HCl (r2=0.997) and pH 6.8 buffer (r2=0.999).

VARIABLES USED IN TWO LEVEL FACTORIAL DESIGN

A: Amount of ethyl cellulose (%w/v) 0.9-1.5, B: Amount of Polyvinyl alcohol (%w/v) 0.6-0.9, C: Stirring speed (Rpm) 1000-2000.

Variable

Low

High

A: Amount of ethyl cellulose (%w/v)

0.9

1.5

B: Amount of Polyvinyl alcohol (%w/v)

0.6

0.9

C: Stirring speed (RPM)

1000

2000

DETERMINATION OF ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY

The percentage Entrapment Efficiency was found to be in the range of 84.30 to 94.77. As a result of the performed statistical analysis on the data set, it was found that Ethyl cellulose (A) concentration has statistically significant effect and PVA (B) has mild effect on the entrapment process. The encapsulation efficiency could be enhanced by increasing the ethyl cellulose concentration and decreasing the PVA concentration as expected. This may be due to higher concentration of polymer provide more space and also reduces the escaping of drug into the external phase.

DERTERMINATION OF IN VITRO DRUG RELEASE

The cumulative percentage drug release for the prepared nanosponges was found to be in the range of 80.05 % - 95.10% for 8 hours. The drug release rate was related to the drug: polymer ratio. It was observed that the drug release rate decreased by the concentration of polymer. This may be due to the fact that the release of drug from the polymer matrix takes place after complete swelling of the polymer and the concentration of polymer in the formulation increases the time required to swell.

FORMULATION OF OPTIMIZED AZITHROMYCIN LOADED NANOSPONGES

The optimized Azithromycin loaded Nanosponges were prepared by Emulsion solvent diffusion method using the polymer of Ethyl cellulose (0.9g), Polyvinyl alcohol (0.9g), Dichloromethane(20ml) and stirring speed (2000Rpm).

FT-IR SPECTRUM OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION:

From the FT-IR spectra, it is clearly evident that the optimized Nanosponge formulation showed the presence of characteristics bands of Azithromycin. This indicates the absence of chemical interaction between the Azithromycin and the excipients.

PERCENTAGE YIELD:

Azithromycin loaded nanosponge was prepared and their percentage yield was found to be 92.14%.

SOLUBILITY STUDIES:

The solubility study of optimized Azithromycin loaded Nanosponge in different dissolution medium is performed by saturation solubility method. The solubility of optimized Nanosponge formulation compared with pure drug and tabulated below.

Formulation code

Solubility of Optimized Nanosponge

Distilled water (mg/ml)

Phosphate buffer Ph 6.8 (mg/ml)

Pure Drug

0.137

0.264

Optimized

Nanosponge

7.9833

13.2344

DETERMINATION OF DRUG CONTENT:

The UV-visible spectrophotometric method was used to determine the drug content of optimized nanosponge formulation. The drug content was found to be 94.6%.

DETERMINATION OF ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY:

The entrapment efficiency of the optimized formulation was determined and their entrapment efficiency of the formulations was observed to be 94.77 %.

IN VITRO DRUG RELEASE

In vitro release of optimized formulation showed a rapid initial burst, followed by a very slow drug release. An initial, fast release may be due to more amount of the drug was entrapped near the surface of the Nanosponge due to larger surface area, rather than inside the particles. The optimized formulation shows controlled release up to 8th hour.

SEM IMAGE OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATIONS AT 3.00 KX

The shape and surface morphology of optimized formulations were observed in scanning electron microscope. It shows that the Nanosponges were spherical with numerous pores on their surface, uniform and spongy in nature. The pores are tunneled inwards which may be due to diffusion of solvent (dichloromethane) from the surface of the Nanosponges.

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

The particle size analysis of optimized Nanosponge formulation was measured. The mean particle size and Z average was found to be 183.5 nm. This is within nanometric range.

POLY DIVERSITY

Polydispersity of optimized Nanosponge formulation was found to be 0.328 indicating uniformity of particle size within formulation.

ZETA POTENTIAL

The zeta potential for the optimized Nanosponge formulation was found to be -25.2 mV which shows that the formulation is stable.

FLOW PROPERTIES

Flow properties are measured for the optimized Azithromycin loaded nanosponge.

The optimized formulation has good flow property compared with pure drug.

OPTIMIZED AZITHROMYCIN NSs FILLED IN THE CAPSULES

The optimized Nanosponges were filled into “1” size hard gelatin capsules without adding glidant or excipients because of good flow properties. The filled capsules contain 500 mg of Azithromycin.

Uniformity of weight 0.5806 ±0.001779 (Mean ±SD (n=20)

The Capsules comply with the official test for Uniformity of weight.

Disintegration test 8.30 mins. The Capsules comply with the official test for Disintegration test.

Drug Content Optimized formulation 94.6±0.267 Mean ±SD (n= 2)

The drug content was within the limits (not less than 90% and not more than 110%). It complies with the official standard.

Kinetic Models

Kinetic Models

Coefficient of determination (R2) of optimized formulations

First order

0.985

Zero order

0.967

Higuchi

0.920

Korsmeyer- peppas kinetics

0.969

Hixson Crowell

0.885

  • The data from in vitro release of optimized formulation were fit into various kinetic models to find out the mechanism of drug release from Azithromycin Nanosponges.
  • A Good linearity was observed with the zero order (R2=0.967), the zero-order kinetics explains the controlled release of the prepared Nanosponges over the period of 8 hours.
  • Higuchi plot (R2=0.920) shows linearity, which indicates the rate of drug release through the mode of diffusion and to further confirm the diffusion mechanism, data was fitted into the Korsmeyer Peppas equation which showed linearity.
  • The slope of the Korsmeyer Peppas plot (n= 0.969) was found to be more than 0.5 indicating that the diffusion was anomalous diffusion (Non Fickian diffusion).
  • Thus, the release kinetics of the optimized formulation was best fitted into Korsmeyer Peppas model and showed zero order drug release with anomalous diffusion (Non Fickian diffusion) mechanism.

STABILITY STUDIES OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION

The optimized formulation was subjected to stability studies as per ICH guidelines. No significant changes in physical appearance, entrapment efficiency, drug content at storage conditions of room temperature, 40°C ± 2°C / 75 ± 5% RH & 4±20 C after the end of 0,15 days and 30 days were observed.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of this research was to prepare Azithromycin Nanosponges for controlled release of drug, to improve the solubility, reduce dose dependent side effects and improve the patient compliance.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

All the authors are thankful to Dr. E. Srilekha Senthilkumar, Correspondent, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur 603 319, Tamil Nadu, India for providing enormous research facilities.

REFERENCES

  1. Akash Garg, Wen-Cheng Lai, Himansu Chopra, Rutvi Agrawal, Talever Singh, Ramkumar Chaudhary, Braj Nandan Dubey. Nanosponges: a promising and intriguting strategy in medical and pharmaceutical science. 2024, vol10, issue-1.
  2. Afrasim Moin, N. K. Famna Roohi, Syed Mohd Danish Riz, Syed Amir, Ashra, Arif Jamal Siddiqui, Mitesh Patel, S. M. Ahmed, D. V. Gowda and Mohd Adnan, Design and formulation of polymeric nanosponge tablets with enhanced solubility for combination therapy ADV 2020, 10, 34869-34884.
  3. Aggarwal G, Kaur G, Harikumar SL. Nanosponge: New Colloidal Drug Delivery System for Topical Delivery. Igjps 2015;5(1):53-57.
  4. Ahlam Zaid Alkilani, Rania Hamed, Hajer Abdo, Lubna Swellmeen, HaneenA.Basheer, WalaaWahdan, Amani D. Abu Kwiak. Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin-Loaded Niosomal Gel: Optimization, In Vitro Studies, Rheological Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Study. 2022, 7, 44, 39782–39793.
  5. Ana Rita Narciso, Rebecca Dookie, Birgitta Henriques-Normark. Streptococcus pneumoniae epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Microbiology volume 23, pages256–271 (2025).
  6. Ahmed RZ, Patil G, Zaheer Z. Nanosponges - a completely new nano- horizon: pharmaceutical applications and recent advances. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2013; 39:126372.
  7. Amber V, Shailendra S, Swarnalatha S. Cyclodextrin based novel drug delivery systems. J Incl Phenom MacrocyclChem, 2008; 62:23-42. 20.
  8. Approach for Drug Targeting. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016;7(3):383-396.
  9. Bhatia S. Nanoparticles Types, Classification, Characterization, Fabrication Methods and Drug Delivery Applications. Natural Polymer Drug Delivery Systems, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016.
  10. Bin Mohamed Yusof MK. Study of nano-kaolinite properties in clay liner application. Mater Sci Forum. 2017; 889:239–42.
  11. Braz. J. Preparation and evaluation of azithromycin binary solid dispersions using various polyethylene glycols for the improvement of the drug solubility and dissolution rate. Pharm. Sci. 52 (01) • Mar 2016 •https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502016000100002.
  12. Bjad K. Almutairy, Abdullah Alshetaili, Amer S. Alali Design of Olmesartan Medoxomil-Loaded Nanosponges for Hypertension and Lung Cancer Treatments. Polymers 2021, 13, 2272.
  13. Champney WS, Miller M: Inhibition of 50S ribosomal subunit assembly in Haemophilus influenzae cells by azithromycin and erythromycin. Curr Microbial. 2002 Jun;44(6):418-24.
  14. Chien Yie W. Novel drug delivery systems. 2 nded. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1992; 139.
  15. C. Sureshe, J. Thake, M. Karpe and V. Kadam. Nanosponges: A brief review. 2023;85(6):1586-1593.
  16. CH.N.V. RAJA, formulation and evaluation of ciprofloxacin (2013).
  17. Dhavala PB, Kumar VS. An Interesting Nanosponges as a Nanocarrier for Novel drug delivery: A Review, Int J of Pham and Med Res. 2017; 5(2).
  18. Dalia A. Gabera, Mahasen A. Radwanb, Danah A. Alzughaibic, Jenan A. Alailc, Rafa S. Aljumahc, Reema M. Aloqac, Sara A. Alkhalifahc and Siham A. Abdouna. Formulation and evaluation of piroxicam nanosponges for improved internal solubility and analgesic activity. Drug Delivery2023, VOL,30. NO.1 2174208.
  19. Duggi Vamshidhar Reddy, Ambati Sambashiva Rao. Development and Evaluation of Nanosponges based Controlled Release Tapentadol Tablets by Box-Behnken Design. 2021;8(6):5000-5016.
  20. Fohner AE, Sparreboom A, Altman RB, Klein TE: PharmGKB summary: Macrolide antibiotic pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenetic Genomics. 2017 Apr;27(4):164-167. Doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000270.
  21. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Dupont HT, Honore S, Colson P, Chabriere E, La Scola B, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrobial Agents.2020Mar20: 105949.doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949.
  22. Ibadullayeva Sevara Saliybayevna, Yakubov Qahhor Yodgor Razzoqberganova Dinora Odilbekovna. NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA AND ITS ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology 5 (3), 225-230, 2025.
  23. Kartik Tiwari, Sankha Bhattacharya. The ascension of nanosponges as a drug delivery carrier: preparation, characterization, and applications Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine (2022) 33:28.
  24. Khan KA, Bhargav E, Reddy KR, Sowmya C. Nanosponges: A New Approach for Drug Targeting. Int. J pharm. pharm. res. 2016; 7(3):381- 396.
  25. Kaur P, kaur L, Khan MU. Nanoparticles as A Novel Drug Delivery System: A Review. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry 2012; P- 2(3)756-761.
  26. Limce Thampi1, K. R. Akshay, Gayathri Gopi, Nazrin K. I., Ponnu Jacob, Gini EJ. Development and evaluation of itraconazole nanosponges as a fungi evacuator –an optimistic drug delivery system. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Vol 11, Issue 1, 2022.
  27. Li X. Physicochemical characterization and aerosol dispersion performance of organic solution advanced spray-dried microparticulate/nanoparticulate antibiotic dry powders of tobramycin and azithromycin for pulmonary inhalation aerosol delivery. Euro J Pharm Sci. 2014. PMID: 24215736.
  28. Micheal J. Parnaham, Vesna erakovic Haber, robin Vos. azithromycin: mechanism of action and their relevance for clinical applications. (2014) 0163-7258.
  29. Marrie, T. J. (1994). Community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 18(4), 501–513.DOI: 10.1093/clinids/18.4.501
  30. Metlay, J. P., et al. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 200(7), e45–e67.DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST
  31. Mohammed Muqtader Ahmed, Farhat Fatima, Md. Khalid Anwer, Elmutasim Osman Ibnouf, Mohd Abul Kalam, Aws Alshamsan, Mohammed F. Aldawsari, Ahmed Alalaiwe, Mohammad Javed Ansar. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of topical nanosponge-based gel containing butenafine for the treatment of fungal skin infection. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 29 (2021) 467–477.
  32. Madrid Sani AT. Development of a dry powder formulation for pulmonary delivery of azithromycin-loaded nanoparticles. J Pharm Sci. 2024. PMID: 39469425.
  33. Nacht S, Kantz M. David W.O and Anfon H.A; (1992) the micro sponge: a novel topical programmable delivery system, In: Topical Drug Delivery Systems.
  34. Panda S, Vijayalakshmi SV, Patnaik S, Swain RP. Nanosponges: A Novel Carrier for Targeted Drug Delivery. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2015; 8(7):213-224.
  35. Peters DH, Friedel HA, McTavish D: Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99. Doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00007.
  36. Patel EK, Oswal RJ. Nanosponge and Micro sponges: A Novel Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry, 2012.
  37. Pavithra P. Prabhu, Prathvi, Tanvi V. Gujaran, Bjad K. Almutairy et al., (2021). Development of lapatinib nanosponges for enhancing bioavailability Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology Volume 65, October 2021, 102684.
  38. Praharsh Kumar Mandadhi Rajendra, Karthik Ganesan, Bala Sai Souith Nidamanuri, Jawahar Nataraja, Nirmala Puttaswamy. Design, formulation, and evaluation of curcumin-loaded nanosponges for the effective management of colitis. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 12(12), pp 059-071, December, 2022.
  39. Prina, E., Ranzani, O. T., & Torres, A. (2015). Community-acquired pneumonia. The Lancet, 386(9998), 1097–1108.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60733-4.
  40. Rajeswari C, Alka A, Javed A, Khar R K. Cyclodextrins in drug delivery: an update review. AAPS pharm SciTech, 2005; 6(2): E329-E357.
  41. Rao MRP, Bhingole RC. Nanosponge-based paediatric-controlled release dry suspension of Gabapentin for reconstitution. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015; 41:2029–36.
  42. Raymond C Rowe, Paul J Sheskey, Marian E Quinn. Handbook of Pharmaceutical excipients, Sixth edition.
  43. Renuka S, Roderick BW, Kamla P. Evaluation of the kinetics and mechanism of drug release from Econazole Nitrate nanosponge loaded Carbopol hydrogel. Ind J Parm Edu 2011; 45(1): 25-31.
  44. Raymond C, Rowe, Paul J, Sheskey, Marian E. Quinn Hand book of pharmaceutical excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmacists Association; 2009. Polyvinyl alcohol [Internet]. En.wikipedia.org. 2019 [cited 5 April 2019].
  45. Selvamuthukumar Subramanian, singireddy Anand Reddy, Krishnamoorthy Kannan. Nanosponges:  A novel class of drug delivery system. 2012. 15(1):103-1.
  46. Tharayil A, Rajkumari R, Kumar A, Choudhary MD, Palit P, Thomas S. New insights into application of nanoparticles in the diagnosis and screening of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Emergent Mater 2021;4: 101-17.
  47. Swetha. T, Mrs.Tanush Ree Chakraborty. Nanosponges: new colloidal drug delivery system for topical drug delivery. Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2019; 06(02).
  48. Salunke A, Upamanyu N. Formulation, Development and Evaluation of Budesonide Oral Nano-sponges Using DOE Approach: In Vivo Evidences. Adv Pharm Bull. 2021;11(2):286-294.
  49. Samia M. Omar, Fares Ibrahim, Aliaa Ismail. Formulation and evaluation of cyclodextrin-based nanosponges of griseofulvin as pediatric oral liquid dosage form for enhancing bioavailability and masking bitter taste. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 1319-0164.
  50. Saritha Daminen Saritha Damineni, Sai Lakshmi, Srikanth Reddy Formulation and Evaluation of Lansoprazole Loaded Nanosponges Turk J Pharm Sci 13(3), 304-310, 2016.
  51. SayyoraKamalova. THE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN PNEUMONIA. Modern Science and Research 4 (5), 1384-1391, 2025.
  52. Sharma R, Pathak K. Polymeric nanosponges as an alternative carrier for improved retention of econazole nitrate onto the skin through topical hydrogel formulation. Pharm Dev Tech. 2011; 16(4):367-376.
  53. Singh A. Development and Evaluation of Cyclodextrin Based Nanosponges for Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Bioavailable Drug. World J. Pharm Sci.2017; 6(2):805-836.
  54. Singh D, Soni GC, Prajapati SK. Recent Advances in Nanosponges as Drug Delivery System: A Review Article, Euro J Pharm Med Res. 2016; 3(10):364-371.
  55. Singireddy A, Rani Pedireddi S, Nimmagadda S, Subramanian S. Beneficial effects of microwave assisted heating versus conventional heating in synthesis of cyclodextrin based nanosponges. Mater Today Proc. 2016; 3:3951–9.
  56. Srinivas P, Sreeja. K. Formulation and Evaluation of Voriconazole Loaded Nanosponges for Oral and Topical Delivery. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013; 5(1):55-68.
  57. Sriram N, Jeevanandham, Viswa, Revathi Mala. Formulation and evaluation of gel loaded microsponges of diclofenac sodium. International journal of famacia, 2016; vol-(2) 4:270-279.
  58. Srishali M ghurghure et al., (2019) Shrishail M. Ghurghure, Surwase Priyanka. fabrication and evaluation of simvastatin nano sponges for oral delivery. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2019 ISSN NO: 2231-6876.
  59. Swarupa Arvapally, M. Harini, G. Harshitha, A. Arun Kumar. Formulation And In-Vitro Evaluation of Glipizide Nanosponges. American Journal of Pharm Tech Research;2017;7(3).
  60. Safila Naveed, Madiha Ali, Asra Ahamed. Awareness about pneumonia. (2015) vol 3, 260-264.
  61. Targe BM, Patil MP, Jahagirdar Baliram D. Nanosponges- An emerging Drug Delivery System. Int J of Insti Pharm and Life Sci. 2015; 5(6):160- 173.
  62. Tarun Kumar sapaty et al., (2020) International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. formulation and in-vitro evaluation of carbamazepine nanosponge IJPSR, 2020; Vol. 11(7): 308.
  63. Tracy swainston Harrison, Susan J. Keam. Azithromycin extended release – a review of its use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis and community acquired pneumonia in the u. (2007); 67(5).
  64. Uday B.B., Manvi F.V., Kotha R., Pallax S.S., Paladugu A. and Reddy K.R., Recent Advances in Nanosponges as Drug Delivery System, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology, Volume-6, April-June 2013;1934-1944.
  65. Vigneshwaran R, formulation, optimization and evaluation of allopurinol loaded nanosponges for the treatment of gout. (2024) Vol-9. pp:1772-1782.
  66. Wei Shen lim. Pneumonia- overview (2022) vol-4 11636-8.
  67. What are the best antibiotics for pneumonia? Medically reviewed by Drugs.com. Last updated on Oct 11, 2024.
  68. William Heggie, Zita Maria De Mouro Vaz Azevedo Mendes, "Process for the preparation of azithromycin." U.S. Patent US6013778, issued November, 1994.US6013778.
  69. Yahya H Dallal Bashi. Inhaled dry powder liposomal azithromycin for treatment of chronic lower respiratory tract infection. Int J Pharm. 2024.

Reference

  1. Akash Garg, Wen-Cheng Lai, Himansu Chopra, Rutvi Agrawal, Talever Singh, Ramkumar Chaudhary, Braj Nandan Dubey. Nanosponges: a promising and intriguting strategy in medical and pharmaceutical science. 2024, vol10, issue-1.
  2. Afrasim Moin, N. K. Famna Roohi, Syed Mohd Danish Riz, Syed Amir, Ashra, Arif Jamal Siddiqui, Mitesh Patel, S. M. Ahmed, D. V. Gowda and Mohd Adnan, Design and formulation of polymeric nanosponge tablets with enhanced solubility for combination therapy ADV 2020, 10, 34869-34884.
  3. Aggarwal G, Kaur G, Harikumar SL. Nanosponge: New Colloidal Drug Delivery System for Topical Delivery. Igjps 2015;5(1):53-57.
  4. Ahlam Zaid Alkilani, Rania Hamed, Hajer Abdo, Lubna Swellmeen, HaneenA.Basheer, WalaaWahdan, Amani D. Abu Kwiak. Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin-Loaded Niosomal Gel: Optimization, In Vitro Studies, Rheological Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Study. 2022, 7, 44, 39782–39793.
  5. Ana Rita Narciso, Rebecca Dookie, Birgitta Henriques-Normark. Streptococcus pneumoniae epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Microbiology volume 23, pages256–271 (2025).
  6. Ahmed RZ, Patil G, Zaheer Z. Nanosponges - a completely new nano- horizon: pharmaceutical applications and recent advances. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2013; 39:126372.
  7. Amber V, Shailendra S, Swarnalatha S. Cyclodextrin based novel drug delivery systems. J Incl Phenom MacrocyclChem, 2008; 62:23-42. 20.
  8. Approach for Drug Targeting. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016;7(3):383-396.
  9. Bhatia S. Nanoparticles Types, Classification, Characterization, Fabrication Methods and Drug Delivery Applications. Natural Polymer Drug Delivery Systems, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016.
  10. Bin Mohamed Yusof MK. Study of nano-kaolinite properties in clay liner application. Mater Sci Forum. 2017; 889:239–42.
  11. Braz. J. Preparation and evaluation of azithromycin binary solid dispersions using various polyethylene glycols for the improvement of the drug solubility and dissolution rate. Pharm. Sci. 52 (01) • Mar 2016 •https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502016000100002.
  12. Bjad K. Almutairy, Abdullah Alshetaili, Amer S. Alali Design of Olmesartan Medoxomil-Loaded Nanosponges for Hypertension and Lung Cancer Treatments. Polymers 2021, 13, 2272.
  13. Champney WS, Miller M: Inhibition of 50S ribosomal subunit assembly in Haemophilus influenzae cells by azithromycin and erythromycin. Curr Microbial. 2002 Jun;44(6):418-24.
  14. Chien Yie W. Novel drug delivery systems. 2 nded. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1992; 139.
  15. C. Sureshe, J. Thake, M. Karpe and V. Kadam. Nanosponges: A brief review. 2023;85(6):1586-1593.
  16. CH.N.V. RAJA, formulation and evaluation of ciprofloxacin (2013).
  17. Dhavala PB, Kumar VS. An Interesting Nanosponges as a Nanocarrier for Novel drug delivery: A Review, Int J of Pham and Med Res. 2017; 5(2).
  18. Dalia A. Gabera, Mahasen A. Radwanb, Danah A. Alzughaibic, Jenan A. Alailc, Rafa S. Aljumahc, Reema M. Aloqac, Sara A. Alkhalifahc and Siham A. Abdouna. Formulation and evaluation of piroxicam nanosponges for improved internal solubility and analgesic activity. Drug Delivery2023, VOL,30. NO.1 2174208.
  19. Duggi Vamshidhar Reddy, Ambati Sambashiva Rao. Development and Evaluation of Nanosponges based Controlled Release Tapentadol Tablets by Box-Behnken Design. 2021;8(6):5000-5016.
  20. Fohner AE, Sparreboom A, Altman RB, Klein TE: PharmGKB summary: Macrolide antibiotic pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenetic Genomics. 2017 Apr;27(4):164-167. Doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000270.
  21. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Dupont HT, Honore S, Colson P, Chabriere E, La Scola B, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrobial Agents.2020Mar20: 105949.doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949.
  22. Ibadullayeva Sevara Saliybayevna, Yakubov Qahhor Yodgor Razzoqberganova Dinora Odilbekovna. NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA AND ITS ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology 5 (3), 225-230, 2025.
  23. Kartik Tiwari, Sankha Bhattacharya. The ascension of nanosponges as a drug delivery carrier: preparation, characterization, and applications Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine (2022) 33:28.
  24. Khan KA, Bhargav E, Reddy KR, Sowmya C. Nanosponges: A New Approach for Drug Targeting. Int. J pharm. pharm. res. 2016; 7(3):381- 396.
  25. Kaur P, kaur L, Khan MU. Nanoparticles as A Novel Drug Delivery System: A Review. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry 2012; P- 2(3)756-761.
  26. Limce Thampi1, K. R. Akshay, Gayathri Gopi, Nazrin K. I., Ponnu Jacob, Gini EJ. Development and evaluation of itraconazole nanosponges as a fungi evacuator –an optimistic drug delivery system. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Vol 11, Issue 1, 2022.
  27. Li X. Physicochemical characterization and aerosol dispersion performance of organic solution advanced spray-dried microparticulate/nanoparticulate antibiotic dry powders of tobramycin and azithromycin for pulmonary inhalation aerosol delivery. Euro J Pharm Sci. 2014. PMID: 24215736.
  28. Micheal J. Parnaham, Vesna erakovic Haber, robin Vos. azithromycin: mechanism of action and their relevance for clinical applications. (2014) 0163-7258.
  29. Marrie, T. J. (1994). Community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 18(4), 501–513.DOI: 10.1093/clinids/18.4.501
  30. Metlay, J. P., et al. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 200(7), e45–e67.DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST
  31. Mohammed Muqtader Ahmed, Farhat Fatima, Md. Khalid Anwer, Elmutasim Osman Ibnouf, Mohd Abul Kalam, Aws Alshamsan, Mohammed F. Aldawsari, Ahmed Alalaiwe, Mohammad Javed Ansar. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of topical nanosponge-based gel containing butenafine for the treatment of fungal skin infection. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 29 (2021) 467–477.
  32. Madrid Sani AT. Development of a dry powder formulation for pulmonary delivery of azithromycin-loaded nanoparticles. J Pharm Sci. 2024. PMID: 39469425.
  33. Nacht S, Kantz M. David W.O and Anfon H.A; (1992) the micro sponge: a novel topical programmable delivery system, In: Topical Drug Delivery Systems.
  34. Panda S, Vijayalakshmi SV, Patnaik S, Swain RP. Nanosponges: A Novel Carrier for Targeted Drug Delivery. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2015; 8(7):213-224.
  35. Peters DH, Friedel HA, McTavish D: Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99. Doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00007.
  36. Patel EK, Oswal RJ. Nanosponge and Micro sponges: A Novel Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry, 2012.
  37. Pavithra P. Prabhu, Prathvi, Tanvi V. Gujaran, Bjad K. Almutairy et al., (2021). Development of lapatinib nanosponges for enhancing bioavailability Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology Volume 65, October 2021, 102684.
  38. Praharsh Kumar Mandadhi Rajendra, Karthik Ganesan, Bala Sai Souith Nidamanuri, Jawahar Nataraja, Nirmala Puttaswamy. Design, formulation, and evaluation of curcumin-loaded nanosponges for the effective management of colitis. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 12(12), pp 059-071, December, 2022.
  39. Prina, E., Ranzani, O. T., & Torres, A. (2015). Community-acquired pneumonia. The Lancet, 386(9998), 1097–1108.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60733-4.
  40. Rajeswari C, Alka A, Javed A, Khar R K. Cyclodextrins in drug delivery: an update review. AAPS pharm SciTech, 2005; 6(2): E329-E357.
  41. Rao MRP, Bhingole RC. Nanosponge-based paediatric-controlled release dry suspension of Gabapentin for reconstitution. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015; 41:2029–36.
  42. Raymond C Rowe, Paul J Sheskey, Marian E Quinn. Handbook of Pharmaceutical excipients, Sixth edition.
  43. Renuka S, Roderick BW, Kamla P. Evaluation of the kinetics and mechanism of drug release from Econazole Nitrate nanosponge loaded Carbopol hydrogel. Ind J Parm Edu 2011; 45(1): 25-31.
  44. Raymond C, Rowe, Paul J, Sheskey, Marian E. Quinn Hand book of pharmaceutical excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmacists Association; 2009. Polyvinyl alcohol [Internet]. En.wikipedia.org. 2019 [cited 5 April 2019].
  45. Selvamuthukumar Subramanian, singireddy Anand Reddy, Krishnamoorthy Kannan. Nanosponges:  A novel class of drug delivery system. 2012. 15(1):103-1.
  46. Tharayil A, Rajkumari R, Kumar A, Choudhary MD, Palit P, Thomas S. New insights into application of nanoparticles in the diagnosis and screening of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Emergent Mater 2021;4: 101-17.
  47. Swetha. T, Mrs.Tanush Ree Chakraborty. Nanosponges: new colloidal drug delivery system for topical drug delivery. Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2019; 06(02).
  48. Salunke A, Upamanyu N. Formulation, Development and Evaluation of Budesonide Oral Nano-sponges Using DOE Approach: In Vivo Evidences. Adv Pharm Bull. 2021;11(2):286-294.
  49. Samia M. Omar, Fares Ibrahim, Aliaa Ismail. Formulation and evaluation of cyclodextrin-based nanosponges of griseofulvin as pediatric oral liquid dosage form for enhancing bioavailability and masking bitter taste. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 1319-0164.
  50. Saritha Daminen Saritha Damineni, Sai Lakshmi, Srikanth Reddy Formulation and Evaluation of Lansoprazole Loaded Nanosponges Turk J Pharm Sci 13(3), 304-310, 2016.
  51. SayyoraKamalova. THE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN PNEUMONIA. Modern Science and Research 4 (5), 1384-1391, 2025.
  52. Sharma R, Pathak K. Polymeric nanosponges as an alternative carrier for improved retention of econazole nitrate onto the skin through topical hydrogel formulation. Pharm Dev Tech. 2011; 16(4):367-376.
  53. Singh A. Development and Evaluation of Cyclodextrin Based Nanosponges for Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Bioavailable Drug. World J. Pharm Sci.2017; 6(2):805-836.
  54. Singh D, Soni GC, Prajapati SK. Recent Advances in Nanosponges as Drug Delivery System: A Review Article, Euro J Pharm Med Res. 2016; 3(10):364-371.
  55. Singireddy A, Rani Pedireddi S, Nimmagadda S, Subramanian S. Beneficial effects of microwave assisted heating versus conventional heating in synthesis of cyclodextrin based nanosponges. Mater Today Proc. 2016; 3:3951–9.
  56. Srinivas P, Sreeja. K. Formulation and Evaluation of Voriconazole Loaded Nanosponges for Oral and Topical Delivery. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013; 5(1):55-68.
  57. Sriram N, Jeevanandham, Viswa, Revathi Mala. Formulation and evaluation of gel loaded microsponges of diclofenac sodium. International journal of famacia, 2016; vol-(2) 4:270-279.
  58. Srishali M ghurghure et al., (2019) Shrishail M. Ghurghure, Surwase Priyanka. fabrication and evaluation of simvastatin nano sponges for oral delivery. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2019 ISSN NO: 2231-6876.
  59. Swarupa Arvapally, M. Harini, G. Harshitha, A. Arun Kumar. Formulation And In-Vitro Evaluation of Glipizide Nanosponges. American Journal of Pharm Tech Research;2017;7(3).
  60. Safila Naveed, Madiha Ali, Asra Ahamed. Awareness about pneumonia. (2015) vol 3, 260-264.
  61. Targe BM, Patil MP, Jahagirdar Baliram D. Nanosponges- An emerging Drug Delivery System. Int J of Insti Pharm and Life Sci. 2015; 5(6):160- 173.
  62. Tarun Kumar sapaty et al., (2020) International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. formulation and in-vitro evaluation of carbamazepine nanosponge IJPSR, 2020; Vol. 11(7): 308.
  63. Tracy swainston Harrison, Susan J. Keam. Azithromycin extended release – a review of its use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis and community acquired pneumonia in the u. (2007); 67(5).
  64. Uday B.B., Manvi F.V., Kotha R., Pallax S.S., Paladugu A. and Reddy K.R., Recent Advances in Nanosponges as Drug Delivery System, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology, Volume-6, April-June 2013;1934-1944.
  65. Vigneshwaran R, formulation, optimization and evaluation of allopurinol loaded nanosponges for the treatment of gout. (2024) Vol-9. pp:1772-1782.
  66. Wei Shen lim. Pneumonia- overview (2022) vol-4 11636-8.
  67. What are the best antibiotics for pneumonia? Medically reviewed by Drugs.com. Last updated on Oct 11, 2024.
  68. William Heggie, Zita Maria De Mouro Vaz Azevedo Mendes, "Process for the preparation of azithromycin." U.S. Patent US6013778, issued November, 1994.US6013778.
  69. Yahya H Dallal Bashi. Inhaled dry powder liposomal azithromycin for treatment of chronic lower respiratory tract infection. Int J Pharm. 2024.

Photo
Snekha. A
Corresponding author

Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Photo
A. Selvi
Co-author

Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Snekha. A, A. Selvi, Design, Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin Loaded Nanosponges for the Treatment of Pneumonia, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 1, 2724-2736. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18360763

More related articles
A Review on Techniques to Enhance Solubility of Po...
Vaishnavi Ramavat, K. Biyani, R. Pagore, Mangesh Gadekar...
Development and Evaluation of Essential Oil-Enrich...
Hritik, Naresh Kumar, Dr. Puneet Kaushal ...
Related Articles
Review On Tobacco Consumption in Pregnant Women...
Mansimran Kaur, Simran Kaur, Amar Pal Singh, Ajeet Pal Singh, Rajesh Kumar...
Review On Postpartum Anxiety and Depression...
Prerna, Gaurav Hastir, Amar Pal Singh, Ajeet Pal Singh, Rajesh Kumar...
RP-HPLC Method Development of Enzalutamide in Tablet Dosage Form and Its Validat...
Trupti Lade , Sayali Chavan, Pallavi Thombare, Sarika Kumbhar...
A Review on Techniques to Enhance Solubility of Poorly Aqueous Soluble Drug...
Vaishnavi Ramavat, K. Biyani, R. Pagore, Mangesh Gadekar...