View Article

  • Development and Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of Imeglimin Hydrochloride in Bulk Form

  • 1,2 Department of Pharmacy, HRIT University, 8th Km Stone, Meerut Road, Near Duhai Rapid Rail Station, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

    3 Department of Regulatory Affairs, TI Medical Private Limited, Khasra No. 1051/1&2, Twin Industrial Estate, Selaqui, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 248197

    4 Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India, Sector-23, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad-201 002..

Abstract

Background: Imeglimin, a novel oral antidiabetic agent belonging to the tetrahydrotriazine class, is widely used for the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The present study aimed to develop and validate a stability-indicating reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for the quantitative estimation of Imeglimin Hydrochloride in bulk form. A simple, efficient, accurate, precise, and reproducible analytical method was successfully established. Chromatographic separation was carried out using an RP-HPLC system equipped with a C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 ?m particle size), ensuring optimal resolution and peak symmetry. The mobile phase consisted of a buffer solution prepared by dissolving 0.6306 g of ammonium formate in HPLC-grade water, with the pH adjusted to 4.0 using dilute formic acid, along with methanol as the organic phase. The developed method demonstrated suitability for routine analysis and stability studies of Imeglimin Hydrochloride.Results: The retention time for Imeglimin Hydrochloride was determined to be 2.594 minutes, with strong absorbance sensitivity observed at a wavelength of 240 nm. The linear regression analysis yielded the equation (y = 21372x + 6E+06) with a correlation coefficient R² = 0.9981 indicating an excellent linear relationship.Conclusion: The developed RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Imeglimin Hydrochloride was found to be linear, precise, accurate, specific, selective, and highly reliable. The method exhibited consistent performance, making it suitable for routine pharmaceutical analysis and quality control of the drug, thereby ensuring its safety, efficacy, and purity. All validation parameters were evaluated in accordance with ICH guidelines, including specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, robustness, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ). The results obtained for all these parameters were within the acceptable limits, confirming the suitability and robustness of the proposed analytical method for its intended purpose.

Keywords

Imeglimin Hydrochloride, Type 2 diabetes, RP-HPLC, %RSD, Method validation

Introduction

× Popup Image

Rapid economic growth and urbanization have significantly contributed to the rising global burden of diabetes. Changes in lifestyle, including sedentary behaviour, unhealthy dietary habits, and increased stress levels, have led to higher prevalence rates. Additionally, improved life expectancy and population aging further add to the growing number of diabetes cases worldwide, making it a major public health challenge [1]. The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poses a significant global public health challenge [2,3]. Despite substantial efforts by governmental and non-governmental organizations toward its diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and awareness, the incidence continues to increase. This upward trend is particularly evident among older adults, individuals with obesity, and high-risk ethnic population [4]. Over recent decades, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become increasingly widespread, paralleling the rise in key risk factors such as metabolic dysfunction, obesity, and sedentary lifestyles. Rapid urbanization, unhealthy dietary patterns, reduced physical activity, and increasing stress levels have further accelerated this trend. Additionally, aging populations and genetic predisposition contribute to the growing burden, making T2DM a significant and escalating global health concern [5], [6], [7].

Several oral antidiabetic agents are available for managing the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus; however, each therapeutic class is associated with inherent limitations [8]. Many of these drugs are linked to notable adverse effects, such as urinary tract infections with sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (e.g., dapagliflozin); weight gain with sulfonylureas like glipizide; hypoglycemia with sulfonylureas (e.g., glibenclamide), meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and insulin; edema with thiazolidinediones such as pioglitazone; and an increased risk of pancreatitis with GLP-1 receptor agonists [9]. Additionally, issues such as declining efficacy over time, patient non-compliance, and cost burden further limit optimal disease management. Despite the wide array of available therapies, none adequately address all three fundamental components of T2DM pathophysiology—excessive hepatic glucose production due to gluconeogenesis, increased insulin resistance, and impaired insulin secretion resulting from pancreatic β-cell dysfunction [10].

Imeglimin is a novel oral antidiabetic agent belonging to the tetrahydrotriazine class, developed for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [11]. It is marketed under the brand name Twymeeg [12] and received its first regulatory approval for clinical use in Japan in June 2021, marking a significant advancement in diabetes therapeutics [13]. Notably, imeglimin represents the first approved drug of the emerging “glimin” class of glucose-lowering agents, introducing a new pharmacological category distinct from existing antidiabetic therapies [14]. The mechanism of action of imeglimin is multifaceted and targets the core pathophysiological defects of T2DM. It enhances Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion (GSIS) from pancreatic β-cells in a glucose-dependent manner, thereby reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. Additionally, imeglimin has been shown to preserve and potentially restore pancreatic β-cell mass and function, which are progressively impaired in patients with T2DM. Furthermore, it improves insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues, particularly in the liver and skeletal muscle, leading to enhanced glucose uptake and reduced hepatic glucose production.

Imeglimin also exerts beneficial effects on mitochondrial function by improving mitochondrial bioenergetics and reducing oxidative stress, which are critical contributors to insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. Through these combined actions—enhancing insulin secretion, preserving β-cell integrity, improving insulin sensitivity, and modulating mitochondrial pathways—imeglimin helps restore overall glucose homeostasis. This unique and comprehensive mechanism distinguishes it from traditional antidiabetic agents and highlights its potential as an effective therapeutic option for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus [11-14].

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD

2.1. DRUG PROFILE:

The structure of Imeglimin Hydrochloride is:

 

 

Imeglimin Hydrochloride is classified as an antidiabetic agent used in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its chemical name is (R)-6-imino-N,N,4-trimethyl-1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine hydrochloride. The molecular formula is C?H??ClN?, with a molecular weight of 191.66 g/mol. For the present study, Imeglimin Hydrochloride was procured from Enaltec Laboratories.

2.2. METHOD:

2.2.1 INITAILISATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD

Table 1: Solubility of Imeglimin HCl in different solvents.

Solvents

Solubility

Water

Freely soluble

Methanol

Soluble

Acetonitrile

Soluble

Acetone

Soluble

Chloroform

Slightly soluble

0.1M NaOH

Sparingly soluble

The solubility of the Imeglimin Hydrochloride active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) was systematically evaluated in a range of solvents, including water, acetonitrile, methanol, ethanol, acetone, water–acetonitrile mixtures, orthophosphoric acid, OPA–acetonitrile buffer, and water–methanol mixtures, as summarized in Table 1. This comprehensive assessment was carried out to identify the most suitable solvent system for effective chromatographic analysis. The results indicated that Imeglimin Hydrochloride exhibited better solubility in polar solvents, particularly methanol and HPLC-grade water. Based on these findings, a combination of methanol and HPLC-grade water was selected as the mobile phase. This selection was further supported by their widespread availability, compatibility with the RP-HPLC system, low toxicity, and cost-effectiveness, making them ideal for routine analytical applications and method development.

Preparation of Mobile Phase

A precisely weighed quantity of 0.6306 g of ammonium formate was dissolved in 1000 mL of HPLC-grade water to prepare the buffer solution. The pH was carefully adjusted to 4.0 using dilute formic acid. The prepared solution was mixed thoroughly to ensure complete dissolution, followed by sonication to remove any dissolved gases. Finally, the solution was filtered to obtain a clear buffer suitable for chromatographic analysis.

Mobile Phase A: Buffer Solution

Mobile Phase B: Methanol was used as the second Mobile Phase.

Preparation of diluent

A diluent was prepared by mixing HPLC-grade water and acetonitrile in the ratio of 900:100 (v/v). This solution was used both as the diluent for sample preparation and as the blank during analysis.

Preparation of standard stock solution

A standard stock solution of Imeglimin Hydrochloride (2000 ppm) was prepared by accurately weighing 200 mg of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and transferring it into a 100 mL volumetric flask. Approximately 15 mL of the prepared diluent was added to dissolve the drug, and the mixture was thoroughly shaken to ensure uniform dispersion. The solution was then sonicated for about 10 minutes to achieve complete dissolution of the drug. After ensuring clarity, the volume was made up to the mark with the same diluent, resulting in a homogeneous standard stock solution suitable for further analysis.

Preparation of standard solution

A 1000 ppm standard solution of Imeglimin Hydrochloride was prepared by accurately transferring 10 mL of the previously prepared standard stock solution into a 20 mL volumetric flask. About 5 mL of the diluent was added, and the solution was sonicated for approximately 10 minutes to ensure complete mixing. The final volume was then made up to the mark with the diluent, yielding a clear and homogeneous solution suitable for further analytical use.

Preparation of test solution

Test solutions of Imeglimin Hydrochloride at concentrations of 800, 900, 1000, 1100, and 1200 ppm were prepared by transferring 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 mL, respectively, of the standard stock solution into separate 20 mL volumetric flasks. Each solution was initially diluted with about 5 mL of the diluent, sonicated for 10 minutes to ensure complete mixing, and then made up to the final volume with the same diluent.

Selection of Detection Wavelength

A solution of Imeglimin Hydrochloride was prepared using methanol as the solvent. The UV spectrum was recorded by scanning the solution over the wavelength range of 200–400 nm. The drug exhibited maximum absorbance (λmax) at 240 nm, which was selected as the optimal detection wavelength for further analysis.

Chromatographic conditions

 

Table 2: Optimized chromatographic conditions used to validate the proposed method.

Sr. No.

Parameters

Details

1.

HPLC System Used

Agilents 1200 Series

2.

Software used

EZ chrom Elite

3.

Column

C18 (150 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm)

4.

Column Temperature

30°C

5.

Flow Rate

1 ml/min

6

Injection Volume

5 μL

7.

Wavelength

240 nm

8.

Run Time

15 min

9.

Mobile Phase

Buffer

10.

Elution Mode

Isocratic

 

 

In accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines, the developed analytical method was validated for key performance characteristics, including specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ) [17], [18]. Validation of optimized method of Imeglimin HCl by RP-HPLC method.

3. RESULT

System Suitability:

System suitability was evaluated using a standard solution of Imeglimin Hydrochloride at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Key chromatographic parameters, including retention time, theoretical plates, tailing factor, and percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD), were determined to ensure the adequacy of the system.System suitability refers to a set of tests performed to verify that the chromatographic system is functioning properly before or during analysis. It ensures that the system provides acceptable performance in terms of resolution, repeatability, and efficiency, thereby confirming the reliability and accuracy of the analytical results.

 

Table 3: System Suitability Study Result of Imeglimin HCl

Parameter

Achieved Value

Acceptance

Theoretical plates

2923

? 2000

Tailing factor

1.23

≤ 2

%RSD of Area

1.02

≤ 2

 

Specificity:

Method specificity was assessed by injecting methanol as the blank and a 100 µg/mL standard solution of Imeglimin Hydrochloride. The chromatograms showed no interfering peaks from the diluent at the retention time of the drug, thereby confirming that the method is specific for the estimation of Imeglimin Hydrochloride.

Specificity is defined as the ability of an analytical method to accurately measure the analyte in the presence of other components such as impurities, degradants, or excipients, without any interference, ensuring reliable and accurate results.

 

 

 

Figure 1: Chromatogram for blank

 

 

Figure 2: Chromatogram for standard imeglimin

 

Accuracy:

The accuracy of the developed method was evaluated at five concentration levels (800, 900, 1000, 1100, and 1200 ppm), with each level analyzed in sextuplicate (six replicates) in accordance with ICH guidelines. Accuracy was determined using the standard addition method. The obtained results were within acceptable limits and were expressed in terms of standard deviation (SD) and percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD), indicating the reliability of the method.

Accuracy is defined as the closeness of agreement between the value found and the true or accepted reference value. It reflects the trueness of the method and its ability to provide results that are free from systematic error.

Calculation of AVG. STD, %RSD of different concentration (800 PPM- 1200 PPM) of Imeglimin HCl on same day:

 

Table 4: Result of Accuracy of Imeglimin HCl (800-1200 PPM)

(The method pass the test and RSD was found to be less than 2%)

Sr. No.

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

1

23496028

25409155

27436386

29086302

31677393

2

23265804

25248053

26997831

29393554

31496797

3

23063272

24908059

26856972

29667099

31517365

4

22885684

24731755

26807069

29791092

31749253

5

22876723

25066917

27159725

29634361

31167739

6

23148722

25101738

27074911

29819701

31853488

MEAN

23122705.5

25101738

27055482.33

29565351.5

31577005.83

SD

236956.8107

249991.048

228372.863

279202.4752

242354.6513

%RSD

1.02

1.00

0.84

0.94

0.77

 

Linearity:

Linearity of the developed method was established by constructing a calibration curve using five concentrations of Imeglimin Hydrochloride (800, 900, 1000, 1100, and 1200 µg/mL). Each concentration was injected into the HPLC system, and the corresponding peak responses were recorded. The calibration curve was plotted with concentration versus peak response, and the regression equation along with the correlation coefficient was determined. The results demonstrated a strong linear relationship between concentration and peak response over the studied range.

 

Linearity is defined as the ability of an analytical method to produce results that are directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte within a given range, indicating the method’s suitability for quantitative analysis.

 

Table 5: Result of Linearity of Imeglimin HCl (800-1200 PPM)

 

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

1

23496028

25409155

27436386

29086302

31677393

2

23265804

25248053

26997831

29393554

31496797

3

23063272

24908059

26856972

29667099

31517365

4

22885684

24731755

26807069

29791092

31749253

5

22876723

25066917

27159725

29634361

31167739

6

23148722

25101738

27074911

29819701

31853488

MEAN

23122705.5

25101738

27055482.33

29565351.5

31577005.83

SD

236956.8107

249991.048

228372.863

279202.4752

242354.6513

%RSD

1.02

1.00

0.84

0.94

0.77

 

PPM

AREA

800

23122705.5

900

25101738

1000

27055482.33

1100

29565351.5

1200

31577005.83

 

 

 

Figure 3: Linearity graph of Imeglimin HCl API

 

RSD value was found less than 2%

A regression coefficient (R²) of 0.9981 obtained between the standard concentrations of Imeglimin Hydrochloride and their corresponding mean peak areas indicated excellent linearity of the calibration curve. Additional regression parameters further supported the linear behavior of the method across the concentration range of 800–1200 µg/mL, confirming its suitability for quantitative analysis.

Precision

Precision of the developed method was evaluated using Imeglimin Hydrochloride solutions at concentrations of 800, 900, 1000, 1100, and 1200 µg/mL. Both intraday and interday precision studies were carried out according to the specified analytical procedures. The results demonstrated consistent and reproducible measurements across different time intervals, indicating the reliability of the method.Precision is defined as the degree of agreement among a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogeneous sample under prescribed conditions. It reflects the reproducibility of the method and is commonly expressed in terms of standard deviation (SD) and percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD).

a.         Repeatability

Repeatability, also known as intra-assay precision, was evaluated by analyzing Imeglimin Hydrochloride solutions in the concentration range of 800–1200 ppm. Each concentration was injected six times under identical operating conditions within the same day. The results demonstrated consistent responses, confirming the method’s repeatability and short-term precision.

Repeatability is defined as the degree of agreement between independent test results obtained under the same operating conditions over a short time interval. It reflects the method’s ability to produce consistent results when performed by the same analyst using the same equipment.

6 Reps of Imeglimin HCl was performed and %RSD was calculated as follows:

 

Table 6: Result of Repeatability Study (Intra Day) of Imeglimin HCl (800-1200 PPM)

(The method passed the test as the RSD was less than 2%)

 

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

1

22473511

26892041

27733123

32261604

32653839

2

22508927

26718420

27814424

31758432

32682552

3

22443523

26680231

27812520

31775303

32834887

4

22445358

26563127

27881443

31740197

32907238

5

22493119

26791505

28045012

32080530

32885915

6

22515901

26501275

28168152

31803524

32924444

MEAN

22480056.5

26691099.83

27909112.33

31903265

32814812.5

SD

31210.53973

144037.208

164683.9792

216203.6217

117834.9672

%RSD

0.14

0.54

0.59

0.68

0.36

 

b. Intermediate Precision

Intermediate precision of the developed method was evaluated by analyzing Imeglimin Hydrochloride solutions in the concentration range of 800–1200 ppm. Each concentration was injected six times on two different days to assess variability under normal laboratory conditions. The results demonstrated consistent performance, confirming the method’s reliability across different days.

Intermediate precision is defined as the degree of agreement among test results obtained within the same laboratory under varied conditions, such as different days, analysts, or equipment. It reflects the method’s reproducibility under routine analytical conditions.

DAY-1: 6 Reps of Imeglimin HCl was performed for interday precision and %RSD was calculated as follows:

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Result of Intermediate Precision (Inter Day-1) of Imeglimin HCl (The method passed the test as the RSD was less than 2%)

 

 

 

 

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

1

23496028

25409155

27436386

29086302

31677393

2

23265804

25248053

26997831

29393554

31496797

3

23063272

24908059

26856972

29667099

31517365

4

22885684

24731755

26807069

29791092

31749253

5

22876723

25066917

27159725

29634361

31167739

6

23148722

25101738

27074911

29819701

31853488

MEAN

23122705.5

25101738

27055482.33

29565351.5

31577005.83

SD

236956.8107

249991.048

228372.863

279202.4752

242354.6513

%RSD

1.02

1.00

0.84

0.94

0.77

 

DAY-2: 6 Reps of Imeglimin HCl was performed for interday precision and %RSD was calculated as follows:

 

Table 8: Result of Intermediate Precision (Inter Day-2) of Imeglimin HCl

(The method passed the test as the RSD was less than 2%)

 

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

1

22852224

25373979

27678154

31586892

33050552

2

22963811

25260822

27696800

31516824

33077423

3

22895265

25278191

27595439

31536793

32975790

4

22857125

25122540

27621141

31542723

32985608

5

22771063

25270275

27607330

31469839

32981033

6

22836310

25219103

27721326

31407514

32958497

MEAN

22862633

25254151.67

27653365

31510097.5

33004817.17

SD

64060.10565

82208.24098

52216.51107

63029.89021

47510.19875

%RSD

0.28

0.33

0.19

0.20

0.14

 

c.) Reproducibility

Reproducibility of the method refers to the precision obtained when the analysis is performed under varying conditions across different laboratories. It is typically evaluated through collaborative studies to ensure the method yields consistent and comparable results irrespective of location.Reproducibility is defined as the degree of agreement among test results obtained for the same sample when the analysis is conducted in different laboratories, using different analysts and equipment. It reflects the robustness and transferability of the analytical method for standardization purposes.

 

Robustness:

 

Table 9: Result of Robustness of Imeglimin HCl

 

 

800 PPM

900 PPM

1000 PPM

1100 PPM

1200 PPM

Buffer

1

18349919

20764591

23713093

26580524

27778235

Conc.

2

18278858

20734015

23841333

26582398

28016411

Plus

MEAN

18314388.5

20749303

23777213

26581461

27897323

 

RSD

0.27436

0.10420

0.38137

0.00499

0.60370

Buffer

1

18219925

20608894

23849045

26655666

27916723

Conc.

2

18252334

20800719

23757021

26656845

28159349

Minus

MEAN

18236129.5

20704806.5

23803033

26656255.5

28038036

 

RSD

0.12567

0.65512

0.27337

0.00313

0.61189

pH Plus

1

18327107

20795818

23807436

26707729

27702075

 

2

18295434

20710956

23578212

26588776

27931358

 

MEAN

18311270.5

20753387

23692824

26648252.5

27816716.5

 

RSD

0.12231

0.28914

0.68411

0.31564

0.58284

pH Minus

1

18328124

20811365

23757020

26815581

28122888

 

2

18382655

20806631

23745530

26858607

28343244

 

MEAN

18355389.5

20808998

23751275

26837094

28233066

 

RSD

0.21007

0.01609

0.03421

0.11337

0.55189

Flow

1

17096813

19398557

21990498

24669757

25403521

Rate

2

17066759

19276964

22074594

24537920

25477483

Plus

MEAN

17081786

19337760.5

22032546

24603838.5

25440502

 

RSD

0.12441

0.44462

0.26990

0.37890

0.20557

Flow

1

20797762

23705436

26936852

30055832

31556419

Rate

2

20819743

23539751

26888138

30105315

31624210

Minus

MEAN

20808752.5

23622593.5

26912495

30080573.5

31590314.5

 

RSD

0.07469

0.49595

0.12799

0.11632

0.15174

Wavelength

1

16833334

19145700

21584595

24076560

25185027

Plus

2

16638191

18952645

21388060

24098427

25385256

 

MEAN

16735762.5

19049172.5

21486327.5

24087493.5

25285141.5

 

RSD

0.82450

0.71662

0.64679

0.06419

0.55995

Wavelength

1

16602392

18869569

21505893

24090973

25198420

Minus

2

16495152

18763846

21359582

24029140

25353478

 

MEAN

16548772

18816707.5

21432737.5

24060056.5

25275949

 

RSD

0.45822

0.39729

0.48271

0.18172

0.43378

Column

1

18646548

21247347

24110000

26909923

28224087

Temperature

2

18757019

21168285

24127590

26952923

28258745

Plus

MEAN

18701783.5

21207816

24118795

26931423

28241416

 

RSD

0.41769

0.26361

0.05157

0.11290

0.08678

Column

1

18711123

21198964

24138050

26813272

28220261

Temperature

2

18576826

21086701

24341598

26816527

28242637

Minus

MEAN

18643974.5

21142832.5

24239824

26814899.5

28231449

 

RSD

0.50935

0.37546

0.59378

0.00858

0.05604

 

Force degradation study

Forced degradation studies were conducted under four stress conditions—acidic, alkaline, oxidative (H?O?), and thermal—to evaluate the stability profile of Imeglimin Hydrochloride. The standard drug was subjected to these stress conditions to induce partial degradation. In accordance with ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines, the objective was to develop a stability-indicating analytical method capable of effectively separating the intact drug peak from its degradation products. These studies also aided in identifying conditions that lead to drug instability, thereby providing essential information for developing appropriate formulation, storage, and handling strategies to ensure product stability. Forced degradation studies are defined as stress testing procedures in which a drug substance is subjected to extreme conditions to accelerate its degradation. These studies help in understanding degradation pathways, identifying degradation products, and establishing the stability-indicating nature of an analytical method.

The detailed procedure for forced degradation is described below:

 

Table 10: Procedure of Force Degradation studies of Imeglimin HCl

Degradation conditions

Procedure

No. of Injections

 

Acidic degradation

1.Add 5&10mL 0.1N HCl in mixed test solution+ stand for 1 hour+ neutralize with same concentration of alkali.

2. Add 5&10mL 1N HCl in mixed test solution+ stand for 1 hour+ neutralize with same concentration of alkali.

 

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

Alkali degradation

1.Add 5&10mL 0.1N NaOH in mixed test solution+ stand for 1 hour+ neutralize with same concentration of acid.

2. Add 5&10mL 1N NaOH in mixed test solution+ stand for 1 hour+ neutralize with same concentration of acid.

 

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

Oxidative degradation

1.Add 5% - 5mL and 10 mL H2O2

2.Add 10% - 5mL and 10 mL H2O2

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

 

Thermal degradation

 

Treated at increased temperature (80oC) for 24 hour.

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

 

Photolytic

Degradation (Light)

Light exposure of sample – 24 hours

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

 

Photolytic

Degradation (UV)

UV exposure of sample – 24 hours

01 injection blank

02 injection of std. solution

02 injection of test solution

 

 

Stability:

Standard solution samples of Imeglimin Hydrochloride were stored at room temperature to evaluate their stability over time. The experimental results indicated that, under the specified storage conditions, the drug remained stable for at least two days without any significant change in its characteristics. Stability is defined as the ability of a drug substance or solution to maintain its chemical, physical, and analytical integrity within specified limits over a given period under defined storage conditions.

DISCUSSION

This study successfully developed and validated a novel, rapid, and efficient reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the quantification of Imeglimin Hydrochloride. Compared to previously reported methods, the proposed approach offers significant advantages, including shorter analysis time and reduced solvent consumption. The retention time of Imeglimin HCl (2.594 minutes) is considerably lower than earlier methods, thereby improving laboratory throughput and overall efficiency. Moreover, decreased solvent usage reduces analytical costs and supports environmentally sustainable practices in line with green analytical chemistry principles.

The method demonstrated excellent robustness, accuracy, and precision, with consistent %RSD values and full compliance with ICH validation guidelines. Linearity was established over the selected concentration range, showing a strong correlation coefficient (R² = 0.9981), confirming reliable quantitative performance. High specificity was also observed, with well-resolved peaks and no interference from excipients or impurities.

Overall, the developed RP-HPLC method is highly suitable for routine pharmaceutical analysis of Imeglimin HCl. Its rapid analysis, high sensitivity at 240 nm, and excellent peak resolution make it particularly effective for quality control applications and the detection of low drug concentrations, ensuring product safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Agilent RP-HPLC technology was utilized to develop and validate a reliable, rapid, and efficient analytical method for the estimation of Imeglimin Hydrochloride. Although the method is simple in design, it is novel and has not been previously reported. Compared with earlier published methods, the proposed approach demonstrates superior performance, with reduced analysis time and lower solvent consumption, making it both time-efficient and cost-effective. The developed method was found to be robust, accurate, precise, and specific for the determination of Imeglimin HCl.

The procedure established for the quantification of Imeglimin API and its pharmaceutical formulation is straightforward, rapid, and economical, as supported by the obtained statistical data. A sensitive and simple RP-HPLC method employing a PDA detector was successfully developed and validated in accordance with ICH guidelines. The method exhibited excellent compliance with all validation parameters, including robustness, accuracy, precision, linearity, specificity, and system suitability.

Furthermore, the method demonstrated reliable %RSD values, strong linearity, and excellent peak separation with enhanced resolution. These characteristics confirm its suitability for routine quality control analysis of Imeglimin Hydrochloride in pharmaceutical laboratories, ensuring consistent and accurate results.

Abbreviations

ICH              International conference on harmonization

HPLC          High performance liquid chromatography

RP-HPLC    Reversed Phase-High performance liquid chromatography

PPM             Parts Per Million

SGLT2         Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 

GLP-1          Glucagon-like peptide-1

API               Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

OPA             Ortho Phosphoric Acid

ACN            Acetonitrile

LOQ             Limit of quantitation

LOD             Limit of detection

RSD             Relative standard deviation

SD                Standard deviation

PDA               Photo Diode Array Detector

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they don’t  have any conflict of interest .

 

REFERENCES

  1. M. A. B. Khan, M. J. Hashim, J. K. King, R. D. Govender, H. Mustafa, and J. Al Kaabi, “Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes – Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends,” J Epidemiol Glob Health, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 107, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.2991/JEGH.K.191028.001.
  2. C. Bommer et al., “Global Economic Burden of Diabetes in Adults: Projections From 2015 to 2030,” Diabetes Care, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 963–970, May 2018, doi: 10.2337/DC17-1962.
  3. J. Xie et al., “Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990-2019: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” BMJ, vol. 379, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1136/BMJ-2022-072385.
  4. F. B. Hu, “Globalization of DiabetesThe role of diet, lifestyle, and genes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1249–1257, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.2337/DC11-0442.
  5. . Hallakou-Bozec, M. Kergoat, D. E. Moller, and S. Bolze, “Imeglimin preserves islet β-cell mass in Type 2 diabetic ZDF rats,” Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1002/EDM2.193.
  6. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 664, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  7. . V. Pinti, G. K. Fink, Q. A. Hathaway, A. J. Durr, A. Kunovac, and J. M. Hollander, “Mitochondrial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an organ-based analysis,” Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, vol. 316, no. 2, pp. E268–E285, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.00314.2018.
  8. K. S. Johansson, A. Brønden, F. K. Knop, and M. B. Christensen, “Clinical pharmacology of imeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes,” Expert Opin Pharmacother, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 871–882, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1729123.
  9. “View of Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Antidiabetic Drug (Imeglimin HCL) in Bulk and its Dosage Form.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.jchr.org/index.php/JCHR/article/view/5448/3431
  10. A. Jain, L. K. Soni, and R. Sharma, “Development And Validation Of Stability Indicating Rp-Uhplc Method For The Estimation Of Imeglimin Hydrochloride Used For The Treatment Of Metabolic Disorder Diabetes Mellitus,” International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 211–217, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.22159/IJAP.2023V15I6.49757.
  11. V. Pirags, H. Lebovitz, and P. Fouqueray, “Imeglimin, a novel glimin oral antidiabetic, exhibits a good efficacy and safety profile in type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 852–858, 2012, doi: 10.1111/J.1463-1326.2012.01611.X.
  12. A. S. Salvi, M. S. Khamkar2, and L. D. Hingane3, “Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Anti-Diabetic Drug in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form,” 2023, Accessed: Aug. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgh366
  13. Y. N. Lamb, “Imeglimin Hydrochloride: First Approval,” Drugs, vol. 81, no. 14, pp. 1683–1690, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S40265-021-01589-9.
  14. H. Yanai, H. Adachi, M. Hakoshima, and H. Katsuyama, “Glucose-Lowering Effects of Imeglimin and Its Possible Beneficial Effects on Diabetic Complications,” Biology (Basel), vol. 12, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/BIOLOGY12050726.
  15. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 664–673, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  16. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 664, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  17. International Conference On Harmonisation Of Technical Requirements For Registration Of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use Ich Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Stability Testing Of New Drug Substances And Products Q1a(R2),” 2003.
  18. M. Blessy, R. D. Patel, P. N. Prajapati, and Y. K. Agrawal, “Development of forced degradation and stability indicating studies of drugs—A review,” J Pharm Anal, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 159, 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.JPHA.2013.09.003..

Reference

  1. M. A. B. Khan, M. J. Hashim, J. K. King, R. D. Govender, H. Mustafa, and J. Al Kaabi, “Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes – Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends,” J Epidemiol Glob Health, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 107, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.2991/JEGH.K.191028.001.
  2. C. Bommer et al., “Global Economic Burden of Diabetes in Adults: Projections From 2015 to 2030,” Diabetes Care, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 963–970, May 2018, doi: 10.2337/DC17-1962.
  3. J. Xie et al., “Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990-2019: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” BMJ, vol. 379, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1136/BMJ-2022-072385.
  4. F. B. Hu, “Globalization of DiabetesThe role of diet, lifestyle, and genes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1249–1257, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.2337/DC11-0442.
  5. . Hallakou-Bozec, M. Kergoat, D. E. Moller, and S. Bolze, “Imeglimin preserves islet β-cell mass in Type 2 diabetic ZDF rats,” Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1002/EDM2.193.
  6. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 664, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  7. . V. Pinti, G. K. Fink, Q. A. Hathaway, A. J. Durr, A. Kunovac, and J. M. Hollander, “Mitochondrial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an organ-based analysis,” Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, vol. 316, no. 2, pp. E268–E285, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.00314.2018.
  8. K. S. Johansson, A. Brønden, F. K. Knop, and M. B. Christensen, “Clinical pharmacology of imeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes,” Expert Opin Pharmacother, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 871–882, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1729123.
  9. “View of Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Antidiabetic Drug (Imeglimin HCL) in Bulk and its Dosage Form.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.jchr.org/index.php/JCHR/article/view/5448/3431
  10. A. Jain, L. K. Soni, and R. Sharma, “Development And Validation Of Stability Indicating Rp-Uhplc Method For The Estimation Of Imeglimin Hydrochloride Used For The Treatment Of Metabolic Disorder Diabetes Mellitus,” International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 211–217, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.22159/IJAP.2023V15I6.49757.
  11. V. Pirags, H. Lebovitz, and P. Fouqueray, “Imeglimin, a novel glimin oral antidiabetic, exhibits a good efficacy and safety profile in type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 852–858, 2012, doi: 10.1111/J.1463-1326.2012.01611.X.
  12. A. S. Salvi, M. S. Khamkar2, and L. D. Hingane3, “Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Anti-Diabetic Drug in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form,” 2023, Accessed: Aug. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgh366
  13. Y. N. Lamb, “Imeglimin Hydrochloride: First Approval,” Drugs, vol. 81, no. 14, pp. 1683–1690, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S40265-021-01589-9.
  14. H. Yanai, H. Adachi, M. Hakoshima, and H. Katsuyama, “Glucose-Lowering Effects of Imeglimin and Its Possible Beneficial Effects on Diabetic Complications,” Biology (Basel), vol. 12, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/BIOLOGY12050726.
  15. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 664–673, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  16. S. Hallakou-Bozec et al., “Mechanism of action of Imeglimin: A novel therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Obes Metab, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 664, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1111/DOM.14277.
  17. International Conference On Harmonisation Of Technical Requirements For Registration Of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use Ich Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Stability Testing Of New Drug Substances And Products Q1a(R2),” 2003.
  18. M. Blessy, R. D. Patel, P. N. Prajapati, and Y. K. Agrawal, “Development of forced degradation and stability indicating studies of drugs—A review,” J Pharm Anal, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 159, 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.JPHA.2013.09.003..

Photo
Ishika Bindal
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy, HRIT University, 8th Km Stone, Meerut Road, Near Duhai Rapid Rail Station, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

Photo
Kshitiz Sahu
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, HRIT University, 8th Km Stone, Meerut Road, Near Duhai Rapid Rail Station, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

Photo
Himanshu
Co-author

Department of Regulatory Affairs, TI Medical Private Limited, Khasra No. 1051/1&2, Twin Industrial Estate, Selaqui, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 248197

Photo
Anshika Niranjan
Co-author

Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India, Sector-23, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad-201 002

Ishika Bindal, Kshitiz Sahu, Himanshu, Anshika Niranjan, Development and Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of Imeglimin Hydrochloride in Bulk Form, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 2854-2867, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19640581

More related articles
Patterns and Practice of Intravenous-to-Oral Antib...
Dr.Tharani.C, Dr.Mohamed Rafiq.I, Dr.Padmapriya A...
Phytochemical Screening and Formulation Developmen...
Shilpa Khilare, Dr. Sagar Muley, Ashvini Bankar...
Oroxylin A As a Multi-Target Neuroprotective Agent...
Manashri Ahire , Neha shewale, Dr. Chandrashekhar Patil...
Related Articles
Niosomal Drug Delivery Systems: Emerging Trends in Dermatological Applications...
Imran Rashid, Quazia Ifaq Wani, Arashjit Singh, Neha Srivastava...
Groundnut Shell-Derived Activated Carbon for Lead (Ii) Removal from Aqueous Solu...
Stuti Ganbote, Yogesh Kolekar , Omkar Dhanawade, Pranavi Yadav, Siya Desai , Shravani Kumbhar, Prano...
The Comparision Between Rosuvastatin And Atorvastatin On Lipid Profile, Predispo...
Rudhra Sandhya, P. S. V. Sandeep, Deepika Pallati, Dr. Swathi Boddupally, Dr. Haritha. P, Mohd Shahn...