View Article

Abstract

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. The pathological aggregation of ?-synuclein (?-Syn) into oligomers and amyloid fibrils is the main molecular hallmark of PD. Despite decades of research, there is no approved therapy that directly prevents or reverses ?-Syn aggregation. Plants, fungi and marine organisms provide a chemically diverse set of natural compounds that are a reservoir of bioactive molecules with proven anti-amyloidogenic potential. Objective: This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the studies of virtual screening based on molecular docking for the identification of natural phytochemicals and bioactive compounds as inhibitors of the aggregation of ?-Syn, integrating the evidence of computational methodology, binding mechanism, pharmacophore modelling, ADMET profiling, molecular dynamics simulation and experimental validation. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar for the period 2005-2025. Critical analysis of studies using AutoDock Vina, Glide, GOLD or other platforms to assess ?-Syn fibrillar or monomeric structures with libraries of natural compounds. Results:Polyphenols (EGCG, curcumin, resveratrol, baicalein, quercetin), alkaloids (berberine, sanguinarine), terpenoids (ursolic acid, withanolide A) and marine bioactives (dieckol, fucoxanthin) show strong binding affinity toward the non-amyloid component (NAC) region of ?-Syn with docking scores of -7.5 to -12.5 kcal/mol. Molecular dynamics simulations confirm the thermodynamic stability of the binding. Several leads meet the CNS relevant ADMET thresholds for blood brain barrier permeation and oral bioavailability. Conclusion: Targeted molecular docking studies from natural product compounds form an important pharmacological basis for the development of drugs against PD. The major focus at the moment is the translation of computational results to experimental verification and further development.

Keywords

Alpha-synuclein fibrillation • Parkinson's disease • Natural compounds • Polyphenols • Molecular docking studies • In silico screening • ADMET properties • Molecular dynamics simulation • NAC region • Neuroprotective activity.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease worldwide, impacting more than 10 million people and expected to affect approximately 17 million by 2040 owing to demographic changes around the globe(Dorsey & Bloem, 2018; Dorsey et al., 2018). From the clinical point of view, PD is known for its distinctive motor symptoms, namely resting tremor, bradykinesia, cogwheel rigidity, and postural instability, along with a variety of non-motor symptoms, including cognitive decline, autonomic failure, depression, anosmia, and REM sleep behavior disorder. Parkinsonism pathologically manifests in gradual, selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) region and the presence of intracellular deposits of protein aggregates called Lewy bodies (LBs) and Lewy neurites(Kalia & Lang, 2015). α-Synuclein (α-Syn), the 140 amino acids-long presynaptic protein expressed by the SNCA gene found on chromosome 4q21, is the major constituent of Lewy bodies(Spillantini et al., 1997). In normal circumstances, α-Syn is intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) involved in synaptic vesicle transport and neurotransmitter release (Burré et al.,2018). Nevertheless, genetic variations (A53T, A30P, E46K, G51D, H50Q), PTMs, oxidative stress, and metal ions imbalance facilitate α-Syn misfolding via a series of conformational changes that progress from natively unfolded monomers via soluble oligomers and protofilaments to stable β-sheet aggregates(Lashuel et al., 2013).. The emerging scientific consensus favors pre-fibrillar oligomeric species as the principal neurotoxic agents that mediate membrane damage, proteotoxicity, mitochondriotoxicity, and inflammatory response(Bengoa-Vergniory et al., 2017).. The current pharmacological treatment options for PD patients, such as levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, and deep brain stimulation, effectively alleviate clinical symptoms, yet fail to arrest, delay, or reverse the underlying neurodegenerative process(Connolly & Lang, 2014).. It is precisely this fundamental therapeutic limitation that emphasizes the imperative of designing novel neuroprotective drugs to address the molecular pathogenesis of PD. In particular, the discovery and optimization of small molecules capable of inhibiting α-Syn aggregation constitute one of the most promising, albeit challenging, frontiers of drug discovery for neurodegenerative disorders(Bhatt et al., 2022).. Natural compounds (NCs) obtained from plant, fungal, and marine sources constitute a huge and evolutionarily optimized source of bioactive molecules of tremendous pharmacological diversity. The use of natural products' preparations as traditional ethnomedicines for treating nervous system disorders has been practiced since ancient times in Asia, the Mediterranean region, and America, and pharmacognosy is now validating these uses. Polyphenols (e.g., EGCG, curcumin, resveratrol, baicalein), alkaloids (berberine), terpenoids (ursolic acid), and marine compounds (phlorotannins) have been shown to inhibit α-Syn aggregation in vitro and cell cultures(Ono & Yamada, 2012; Wang et al., 2024). The most important feature of many NCs is that these compounds possess pleiotropic biological effects—addressing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and protein aggregation—a pharmacological approach suitable for tackling multiple factors in PD pathology(Mani et al., 2021).. Molecular docking combined with structure-based virtual screening has emerged as an essential computational technology for selecting NCs libraries for anti-α-Syn drug discovery(Bhatt et al., 2022; Kalra et al., 2023). Using structural information on cryo-EM and solid-state NMR structures of α-Syn fibrils and oligomers, docking simulations predict ligand binding modes, free energy of interaction, and crucial pharmacophoric interactions with α-Syn. (Guerrero-Munoz et al., 2021). Combining molecular docking simulations with MD simulations, pharmacophore modeling, and ADMET analyses constitutes a cost-effective decision-making in silico workflow significantly minimizing experimental attrition rates (Iqbal et al., 2021). This comprehensive review provides an analytical synthesis of the existing literature regarding docking-based screening of natural compounds as inhibitors of α-Syn aggregation. The paper focuses on the following aspects: (i) the structural biology and aggregation pathway of α-Syn; (ii) druggable binding site(s); (iii) natural compounds with anti-aggregation activity based on computational and experimental evidences; (iv) methods used for NC docking and simulations; (v) comparative computational results for different groups of compounds; (vi) ADMET profile and drug-likeness assessment; (vii) structure-activity relationships; (viii) experimentally validated computational predictions; and (ix) problems, new methods and prospects.

2. α-Synuclein: Structure, Aggregation, and Pharmacological Targets  

2.1 Primary Structure and Domain Architecture

The 140-residue primary structure of α-Syn contains three distinct domains that provide functional and aggregating properties of this protein(Lashuel et al., 2013)::

•N-Terminal Amphipathic Region (Amino Acids 1–60): Consists of seven non-repetitive KTKEGV motifs, which exhibit an amphipathic α-helical secondary structure when complexed with phospholipid membranes. This domain controls the docking of vesicles and anchoring of synaptosomes(Snead & Eliezer, 2014). Pathogenic PD mutations, A30P, E46K, and A53T, located within this domain, increase membrane binding and aggregation rates(Zarranz et al., 2004; Bhatt et al., 2010).

• Non-Amyloid Component (NAC) Domain (Amino Acids 61–95): The NAC domain is essential for the oligomerization process and generation of α-Syn amyloid fibrils. Its critical region (68–85 amino acids), including the motif VGGAVVTGVTAVAQK, is responsible for the interaction between intermolecular β-sheets involved in fibril nucleation(Das et al., 2025; Gallardo et al., 2020).This domain is the most important pharmacologic target of aggregation inhibitors(Martins et al., 2023).

• C-Terminal Acidic Domain (Amino Acids 96–140): It is a highly acidic proline-rich domain that regulates the rate of fibrillation by long-range intramolecular interactions with the N-terminal and NAC domains. It undergoes extensive post-translational modification (phosphorylation of Ser129, nitration of Tyr125/Tyr133/Tyr1) — which modulate α-Syn aggregation and cytotoxicity (Oueslati et al., 2016; Kleinknecht et al., 2016).

2.2 Aggregation Pathway and Fibril Structure

α-Syn aggregates through a nucleation-dependent polymerization pathway controlled by three kinetically separated stages: (i) an unfavourable thermodynamic lag phase with initial nucleation and formation of stable oligomeric seeds from monomers; (ii) an exponential elongation phase powered by templated incorporation of monomers into fibrils; and (iii) a secondary nucleation phase catalyzed by fibril surfaces promoting de novo nucleation, which exponentially increases aggregate abundance(Meisl et al., 2017; Flagmeier et al., 2016). Kinetic insight into these phases, obtained by analyzing the pathways with ThT fluorimetry, analytical ultracentrifugation, and single-molecule approaches, highlights targeted intervention sites for pharmacological inhibition(Strohäker et al., 2019). Structural characterization at high resolution using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) of several α-Syn fibril polymorphs with unique architectures and surface topologies is critical for structure-based drug discovery(Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018; Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2019). Essential structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) that may be utilized for molecular docking include:

PDB ID

Method

Resolution

Polymorph / State

Key Features for Docking

6SST

Cryo-EM

3.0 Å

Rod fibril (2 protofilaments)

Full NAC interface; primary docking template

6H6B

Cryo-EM

3.4 Å

Twister fibril polymorph

Distinct inter-protofilament groove topology

6A6B

Cryo-EM

3.5 Å

Compact fibril core

Minimal NAC core for fragment docking

7Y7A

Cryo-EM

2.5 Å

Full-length fibril

Highest resolution; optimal for precision docking

6UFR

Cryo-EM

3.0 Å

MSA polymorph

Disease-specific architecture comparison

2KKW

ssNMR

N/A

Micelle-bound α-helix

Membrane interaction; pre-nucleation state

2.3 Oligomeric Toxins and Neurodegeneration Pathways

The critical yet unresolved issue regarding whether mature fibrils or prefibrillar oligomers act as the major toxic species of α-Syn has far-reaching consequences for developing novel therapeutic strategies(Cascella et al., 2021). Multiple lines of evidence from physical biochemistry, cellular biology, and animal models clearly demonstrate that soluble oligomeric assemblies serve as the principal pathological species(Bengoa-Vergniory et al., 2017. Prefibrillar oligomers (i) create circular membrane pores that destabilize electrochemical gradients and calcium regulation(Ono et al., 2023); (ii) hinder the UPS/ALP pathways and induce proteinopathy and proteostatic impairment(Danzer et al., 2007); (iii) provoke mitochondrial permeabilization and cytochrome c efflux leading to apoptosis(Peng et al., 2020); (iv) stimulate microglial activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes and neuroinflammatory mechanisms in astrocytes(Gibb et al., 2023); and (v) engage in prion-like transmission between interconnected neurons, leading to the Braak anatomical stage pattern(Braak et al., 2003; Brundin & Bhatt, 2018)..

2.4 Potential Drug Targets on α-Synuclein

Using computational pocket analysis, NMR chemical shift mapping, and cryo-EM structures, several binding sites were predicted for α-Syn that may prove useful for pharmaceutical development(Lashuel et al., 2013):

• NAC hydrophobic groove (positions 70-82): The principal region responsible for promoting aggregation with its hydrophobic pocket that can accommodate aromatic and lipophilic molecules. Ligand binding within the groove physically blocks the formation of intermolecular β-sheets, which is the most well-validated therapeutic site(Das et al., 2025; Martins et al., 2023).

• Inter-protofilament interface: Two-protofilament fibril structures obtained via Cryo-EM have an inter-protofilament interface characterized by a groove-like structure, which is stabilized by lysine 80-Glu83 salt bridges and hydrophobic contacts. Inter-protofilament interfaces can be disrupted using small molecules, leading either to fibril core destabilization or formation of non-toxic polymorphs(Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018).

• Tyr39 aromatic patch: The exposed aromatic side chain of tyrosine 39 involved in π-stacking interactions between fibril-growing molecules. Polyphenols interacting with Tyr39 hinder the growth of α-Syn aggregates(Martins et al., 2023).

• C-terminal metals binding site: Metal ions such as Cu²? and Fe³? coordinated by His50, Asp121, and Glu123 trigger oxidative protein aggregation. Natural chelators binding the metals site indirectly inhibit protein aggregation(Arena et al., 2021; Camponeschi et al., 2013).

• N-terminal membrane-binding helix (residues 3-37): The region relevant for membrane-induced nucleation, where inhibitors hindering the membrane-induced α-Syn conformational changes hinder surface-catalyzed aggregate formation(Fonseca-Ornelas et al., 2014; Dvinskikh & Sandström, 2011).  

3. Natural Compound Classes as Aggregators of α-Synuclein

3.1 Polyphenols        

3.1.1 Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG)

The most abundant catechin of green tea (Camellia sinensis), EGCG (C??H??O??; MW 458.37 Da; LogP 1.21), has been the focus of numerous researches investigating its inhibitory potential against α-Syn aggregation(Ehrnhoefer et al., 2008). The polyphenol structure of EGCG, with a benzopyran ring with attached galloyl group and catechol B-ring, comprises four phenolic rings, eight hydroxyl groups, and an ester bond that allows EGCG to interact through hydrogen bonds, π-π interactions, and redox properties. Structurally, EGCG binds to partially folded monomers and early oligomers of α-Synuclein, leading the aggregation process away from amyloid fibrils to non-toxic off-pathway aggregates(Ehrnhoefer et al., 2008; Bieschke et al., 2010).

Autodock Vina docking on PDB 6SST revealed that EGCG binds in the hydrophobic groove of the NAC region, with binding energy ranging from -8.4 to -10.2 kcal/mol, and MM-GBSA scoring from -40 to -55 kcal/mol. Important interactions observed included: several hydrogen bond interactions between the galloyl hydroxyl group and backbone NH of Val70, Thr72, and Ala76; π-π stacking interaction between the catechin B-ring and aliphatic side chain residues of Val74/Val76; and van der Waals interactions holding the galloyl residue to the hydrophobic spine of the β-sheet(Lorenzen et al., 2014). The major limitation for EGCG in clinical practice is its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier due to high TPSA (197 Ų) and molecular weight (>450 Da), requiring formulation techniques such as PLGA nanoparticles, liposome encapsulation, and prodrugs(Qing et al., 2009)..

3.1.2 Curcumin

Curcumin [(1E,6E)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione; M.W. 368.38 Da; logP 3.29], the main bioactive component in turmeric (Curcuma longa), exerts a direct inhibitory effect on α-Syn aggregation via several complementary pathways (Pandey et al., 2008).The extended π-electron system, which covers two methoxyphenol rings connected by a β-diketone group, facilitates the intercalation of curcumin into the hydrophobic NAC pocket and π-stacking with Tyr39 and Phe94(Ahmad & Lapidus, 2012).. According to docking studies, binding energies range from -8.0 to -9.5 kcal/mol, with several hydrogen bonds being formed between phenolic hydroxyl groups and the backbone of Thr75-Val82. Chelation of Cu²? and Fe³? ions at the C-terminal metal binding site by the β-diketone group is another indirect pathway of anti-aggregation activity(Pandey et al., 2008). Although curcumin exhibits excellent anti-aggregation activity in vitro (IC?? ~1-5 µM in thioflavin T tests), its low aqueous solubility (<0.1 mg/mL) and high Phase II gluc(Wang et al., 2024)..

3.1.3 Baicalein

Baicalein (5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone; MW 270.24 Da; LogP 2.06), a flavone aglycone isolated from the root of S. baicalensis Georgi, is one of the strongest and best characterized natural inhibitors of α-Syn fibril formation(Zhu et al., 2004).. Baicalein, which features a flat flavone scaffold with three hydroxyl substituents on C5, C6, and C7, forms a strong hydrogen-bonding network with Thr75, Val76, Thr81, and Ser87 within the NAC domain. The flat bicyclic ring system ensures deep insertion into the hydrophobic groove of the β-sheets. Binding energies calculated via docking analysis span values between −8.6 and −10.8 kcal/mol, whereas MM-GBSA predicted free binding energy values exceed −48 kcal/mol. What makes Baicalein unique is that, in low stoichiometry, it preferentially binds granular rather than amyloid fibrillar α-Syn oligomers and breaks down existing amyloid fibrils (demonstrated by AFM, TEM, and ThT experiments) (Zhu et al., 2004; Masuda et al., 2006). Baicalein is a CNS-penetrating compound that also inhibits α-Syn oligomerisation in living cells (Lu et al., 2011).

3.1.4 Resveratrol

Resveratrol (3,4’-dihydroxy-stilbene; M.Wt = 228.24 Da; logP = 2.82), a polyphenol present in grapes, red wines, and Polygonum cuspidatum, prevents α-Syn aggregation and disassembles fibrils at micromolar concentrations(Caruana et al., 2011).. Resveratrol’s structural features include its stilbene backbone, which offers a stiff and flat aromatic framework, enabling interactions like π-π stacking in the β-strand core of α-Syn fibrils. The presence of three hydroxyl groups in its structure enables hydrogen bonding with Ser87, Val82, and Thr75. Resveratrol docking has shown binding energy values between -7.5 and -9.2 kcal/mol. However, besides direct fibril inhibition, resveratrol has been shown to stimulate SIRT1 deacetylase activity and decrease α-Syn acetylation and aggregation, as well as promote autophagy by inhibiting mTOR signaling, clearing pre-existing aggregates (Wu et al., 2011; Albani et al., 2009).

3.1.5 Quercetin         

Quercetin (3,3',4',5,7-pentahydroxyflavone; MW 302.24 Da; LogP 1.54), abundant in onions, apples, capers, and tea, possesses both direct inhibition of aggregation within the α-Syn NAC region along with powerful abilities of metal chelation and antioxidation(Masuda et al., 2006). Binding to the α-Syn NAC region results in docking scores between −7.8 and [9,10]?9.4 kcal/mol, hydrogen bonding with Thr75, Val76, Gly84, and Ala85 residues, and π–π interactions between the B-ring of the flavone molecule and the fibril’s hydrophobic core(Wang et al., 2013). The 3-OH catechol group acts as a strong ligand for Cu²? and Fe³? at the C-terminal metal-binding site (log K ~12) and prevents oxidative aggregation(Altay et al., 2023).

3.2 Alkaloids 

3.2.1 Berberine

Berberine (MW 336.37 Da; LogP 1.30), a natural isoquinoline alkaloid derived from Berberis vulgaris, Coptis chinensis, and Hydrastis canadensis, is one of the most well-studied α-Syn fibril inhibitors both in computational modeling and experimental analysis(Huang et al., 2021). The planar tetracyclic isoquinoline core fits into the β-sheet backbone of α-Syn fibrils in terms of π-π stacking interactions and hydrophobic contacts with Val70, Val74, and Val82. In particular, the quaternary nitrogen atom forms an important electrostatic interaction with Glu83 (contributes ~1.8 kcal/mol to binding energy), while 9,10-dimethoxy substituents increase van der Waals interactions with Val76 and Ala78. Binding energy values of [18]?8.5 to ?10.1 kcal/mol have beenInhibition of MAO-B increases dopaminergic activity; AMPK activation promotes mitochondria regeneration; NF-κB inhibition reduces neuroinflammation; and modulation of gut microbiome can inhibit α-Syn transmission through gut-brain pathways (Wang et al., 2021).. Preclinical studies on α-Syn mouse transgenics reveal decreased Lewy body formation and enhanced motor function. Positive CNS ADMET properties (TPSA = 40.0 Ų; logBB = −0.2; Fabs oral = 36%) are favorable for further clinical investigation(Huang et al., 2021).

3.2.2 Sanguinarine and Coptisine

Sanguinarine (Molecular Weight: 332.35 g/mol) and coptisine (Molecular Weight: 320.32 g/mol), benzophenanthridine and isoquinoline alkaloids isolated from Sanguinaria canadensis and Coptis japonica respectively, display high affinity for α-Syn NAC region in docking simulation (?8.8 to ?10.5 kcal/mol). Planar arrangement of polycyclic aromatic groups of both molecules allows favorable π-π stacking inside β-sheet core of fibril, resulting in binding energy close to berberine. Nevertheless, high cytotoxicity of sanguinarine at higher doses (above 5 µM) calls for selectivity improvement(Yang et al., 2024)..

3.2.3 Piperine

Piperine (molecular weight 285.34 g/mol; logP 1.98), the main pungent alkaloid from black pepper (Piper nigrum), has been shown to have computational potential as a mild α-Syn aggregation inhibitor with a docking score of ?7.2 to ?8.4 kcal/mol(Caruana et al., 2011).. Besides acting directly on α-Syn aggregates, piperine is a bioavailability enhancer that can increase the bioavailability of curcumin by 2000% when administered in tandem with curcumin by inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme activity and P-glycoprotein efflux transporter activity(Shoba et al., 1998; Bhardwaj et al., 2002).

3.3 Terpenoids

3.3.1 Ursolic Acid and Oleanolic Acid

Ursolic acid (UA; molecular weight 456.71 g/mol; logP 5.88) and oleanolic acid (OA; molecular weight 456.71 g/mol; logP 5.74), pentacyclic triterpenoids found in apple peel, rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), and loquat (Eriobotrya japonica), are inhibitors of α-Syn fibrillation via hydrophobic intercalation into the NAC groove (Isacchi et al., 2022).. The rigid pentacyclic structure of UA and OA occupies a larger hydrophobic volume than polyphenols, leading to substantial van der Waals interactions with Val70, Ala69, Ile88, Val82, and Ala78 (AutoDock Vina scores: ?8. In vitro ThT assays provide evidence for dose-dependent inhibition (IC??: UA ~12 µM; OA ~18 µM). Insolubility issues require nanoscale formulation to ensure proper in vivo bioavailability(Isacchi et al., 2022)..

3.3.2 Withanolide A

Withanolide A (MW 470.64 Da; LogP 2.42) is a lactone isolated from the Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) plant. It is one of the strongest naturally occurring comounds that act as α-Syn ligands, based on docking calculations of [9]?11.2 kcal/mol (Akhoon et al., 2016). and an MM-GBSA value of −54 kcal/mol. This tetracyclic steroidal compound forms multiple hydrophobic interactions within the entire NAC groove (Ala69, Val70, Val74, Val76, Thr81) while its lactone carbonyl forms essential hydrogen bonding with Thr75. The promising ADMET properties (TPSA 96.8 Ų; logBB slightly positive; MW <500 Da) along with the clinically confirmed CNS effects of W. somnifera make withanolides very promising for further development (Akhoon et al., 2016; Manral & Saravanan, 2020).

3.4 Marine Natural Products

3.4.1 Eckol and Dieckol (Phlorotannins)

 The natural polyphenols eckol and dieckol, isolated from the edible brown algae species Ecklonia cava, are some of the most potent known α-Syn binders, as discovered through virtual screening. The compound dieckol (Molecular weight 742.56 Da; LogP 1.2), a dimeric phlorotannin, scores ?10.5-11.4 kcal/mol in binding studies and −50 to −58 kcal/mol for MM-GBSA, due to its extended polyphenolic core capable of forming extensive hydrogen bonding networks (Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Thr81, Ala85) and multiple aromatic ring interactions(Cha et al.). Dieckol's superior computational CNS ADMET profile, alongside strong antioxidant and neuro-inflammatory properties demonstrated using SH-SY5Y cell line models, makes phlorotannins promising leads for anti-Parkinsonian drug development (Cha et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2019).

3.4.2 Fucoxanthin

Fucoxanthin (Molecular weight 658.91 Da; LogP 5.21), a carotenoid found in brown algae (Undaria pinnatifida, Laminaria japonica), shows excellent docking affinity (Scores: ?8.4 to ?9.6 kcal/mol) with the NAC-region(Zhang et al., 2022).. The polyene chain of Fucoxanthin fits into the hydrophobic pocket through van der Waals interaction, whereas acetate and hydroxyl moieties establish H-bonds with residues Thr75 and Ser87. Fucoxanthin’s anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotection mechanisms in cellular PD models support its potential direct anti-aggregation mechanism in addition to its computational efficacy(Pruccoli et al., 2024).

3.5 Other Significant Natural Classes

Other NCs, in addition to those mentioned above, showing substantial computational efficacy against α-Syn protein aggregation include: oleuropein (Molecular weight 540.5 Da; docking scores: ?8.3 to ?9.6 kcal/mol), a secoiridoid glycoside extracted from Olea europaea leaves(Caruana et al., 2011);; rosmarinic acid (Molecular weight 360.3 Da; ?7.9 to ?9.1 kcal/mol), a caffeic acid ester found in Rosmarinus officinalis(Ono et al., 2012); ginsenosides Rg3 and Rb1 (Molecular weight 785–958 Da; ?8.0 to found in Panax ginseng, which inhibit α-Syn fibrillation and disaggregate preformed fibrils (Ardah et al., 2015). These compounds collectively represent promising scaffolds for further optimization and development as anti-aggregation therapeutics targeting α-Syn in Parkinson's disease (Kabra et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2024).

4. Computational Method for Screening Natural Compounds Against α-Synuclein

4.1 Target Protein Structure Preparation

The accuracy and validity of the docking results are significantly affected by the quality of the receptor protein used. In the case of α-Syn, it is preferable to use the higher resolution structure obtained by cryo-EM fibrils (PDB: 6SST, 6H6B, 7Y7A), rather than the previously available structures with lower resolution (Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2018; Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2019). Important steps during the preparation process involve: Protonation at physiological pH (7.4) using PROPKA 3.1 or Protein Prep Wizard of the Maestro software (Schrödinger) (Olsson et al., 2011); Homology modeling of residues lacking using MODELLER 10 or Swiss-Model; Removal of crystallographic issues while retaining the important water molecules; Energy minimization through OPLS4 or ff19SB force fields to eliminate potential steric conflicts; Structural quality verification through MolProbity and Ramachandran analysis (goal: >95% in favorable regions) (Chen et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2018). Due to the IDP nature of α-Syn, ensemble docking with an appropriate number of conformers derived from pre-simulation MD trajectories (50–100 ns) or members of the NMR ensemble gives better results (Fusco et al., 2014).

4.2 Natural Compounds Library Curation and Preparation

Specific natural compound (NC) databases used for α-Syn virtual screening include diverse resources offering structural and biological annotation. The COCONUT database aggregates over 400,000 NCs with structural diversity filters (Sorokina et al., 2021); SuperNatural III contains approximately 325,000 curated NCs with predicted ADMET and drug-like parameters (Günther et al., 2022). Additional specialized resources include UNPD (>230,000 structurally defined NCs), MarinLit and Marine Natural Products databases focused on marine bioactivity, and FooDB/PhytoHub for food-sourced bioactive compounds (Sorokina et al., 2021). Ligand preparation involves the following steps: 3D structure generation using SMILES from RDKit, Open Babel, or CORINA; tautomer and protonation state generation using LigPrep (Schrödinger) or MolVS; conformer ensemble generation using ConfGen or Omega; assignment of partial atomic charges using the RESP method at HF/6-31G* level (or AM1-BCC for ultra-high-throughput workflows); and filtration for PAINS (Pan Assay Interference Compounds) and aggregator properties using FAF-Drugs4 (Baell & Holloway, 2010).

4.3 Docking Platforms and Screening Cascade

A tiered virtual screening cascade balances throughput with accuracy across successive filtering stages:

Platform

Algorithm

Scoring Function

Screening Stage

Strengths

AutoDock Vina

Iterated LGA

Knowledge-based empirical

Primary HTVS of large NC libraries

Free, fast, extensively validated

Glide (Schrödinger)

HTVS → SP → XP

GlideScore XP

Hit refinement and precise ranking

Hydrophobic enclosure, desolvation penalties

GOLD (CCDC)

Genetic algorithm

GoldScore / ChemScore / ASP

Final lead validation

Flexible receptor, explicit water handling

rDock / PLANTS

Pseudo-Brownian / ACO

sDock / PLP ChemPLP

PPI interface screening

Open-source, cavity-adaptive

GNINA / Smina

LGA + CNN scoring

CNN-Score + Vina-AD4

AI-enhanced rescoring

Deep learning scoring functions

4.4 Post-Docking Rescoring and Interaction Analysis

Post-docking optimization is conducted through: MM-GBSA (Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area) rescoring employing Prime (Schrödinger) or MMPBSA.py in AMBER22 for considering solvent contributions and receptor dynamics not accounted for in traditional docking scoring methods (Genheden & Ryde, 2015; Hou et al., 2011); protein-ligand interaction fingerprinting using SIFt (Structural Interaction Fingerprint) or PLIP (Protein-Ligand Interaction Profiler) to calculate hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, salt bridges, and π-interactions across the library of compounds examined (Salentin et al., 2015); WaterMap evaluation to detect energetically unfavorable waters in the binding cavity that are ejected upon ligand binding for entropic gain; and visual examination of high-scoring binding modes using PyMOL 2.5, UCSF ChimeraX, or Discovery Studio Visualizer (Pettersen et al., 2021).

4.5 Pharmacophore Modeling

Pharmacophore modeling identifies crucial spatial chemical features necessary for α-Syn anti-aggregation activity. Ligand-based pharmacophores are built by analyzing validated sets of NCs with inhibitory activity (IC?? <10 µM in ThT assays) using Phase (Schrödinger) or LigandScout (Dixon et al., 2006; Wieder et al., 2017), usually resulting in four-to-six point hypotheses that include: one to two hydrophobic aryl (Ar) features representing polyphenolic ring structures; one to two hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA) for carbonyl or hydroxyl oxygens; one hydrogen bond donor (HBD); and a positive ionizable (PI) feature, optional for alkaloids. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses of α-Syn aggregation inhibitor datasets have validated pharmacophore models encompassing two hydrogen bond acceptors, a hydrophobic group, and aromatic ring features as determinants of inhibitory activity (Yang et al., 2021). E-Pharmacophores or energetic pharmacophore models created through analysis of docking pose interaction energies provide geometric information for pharmacophore-directed database screening and scaffold-hopping (Seidel et al., 2020).

4.6 Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protocols

MD simulates predicted docking-based binding modes under dynamic biological conditions. Traditional protocols use: GROMACS 2023, AMBER22, NAMD 3.0, or OpenMM as molecular dynamics simulators; CHARMM36m or ff19SB force field for protein parameterization — CHARMM36m is specifically optimized for intrinsically disordered proteins such as α-Syn (Huang et al., 2017); GAFF2 or CGenFF for ligand parameter generation; TIP3P or TIP4P-Ew water model in a periodic dodecahedron box with buffer size ≥12 Å; Na?/Cl? ions at 150 mM concentration to neutralize the system; energy minimization, NVT equilibration (10 ns at 310 K), and NPT equilibration (10 ns at 310 K and 1 bar) followed by a 100–500 ns production stage simulation. Sampling techniques including metadynamics (Bussi & Laio, 2020), Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (Miao et al., 2015), replica exchange molecular dynamics, and temperature-accelerated molecular dynamics are used to overcome energy barriers in IDP structural sampling. Major analysis outputs encompass: backbone RMSD and RMSF; radius of gyration (Rg) calculation to measure α-Syn folding state; contact maps; principal component analysis and free energy landscape modeling; binding free energy calculation using MM-PBSA/MM-GBSA with per-residue contributions (Genheden & Ryde, 2015).

5. Comparative Computational Findings: Binding Profiles and Key Interactions

5.1 Comparative Docking Performance for Selected Natural Lead Molecules

Natural Compound

Chemical Class

Target PDB

Docking Score (kcal/mol)

MM-GBSA (kcal/mol)

Primary Interacting Residues

EGCG

Catechin polyphenol

6SST

−10.2

−52.4

Val70, Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Thr81

Dieckol

Phlorotannin (marine)

7Y7A

−11.4

−56.1

Val70, Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Thr81, Ala85

Withanolide A

Steroidal lactone

6SST

−11.2

−53.8

Ala69, Val70, Val74, Val76, Thr75, Thr81

Baicalein

Flavone polyphenol

6SST

−10.8

−48.3

Thr75, Val76, Thr81, Ser87, Gly84

Ursolic acid

Pentacyclic triterpenoid

6SST

−10.4

−49.7

Ala69, Val70, Ile88, Lys80, Lys96

Berberine

Isoquinoline alkaloid

6SST

−10.1

−46.2

Val70, Val74, Val82, Glu83, Asp98

Curcumin

Diarylheptanoid polyphenol

6SST

−9.5

−45.8

Thr75, Val76, Val82, Phe94, Tyr39

Sanguinarine

Benzophenanthridine alkaloid

6SST

−10.5

−47.9

Val74, Val76, Val82, Glu83, Thr81

Ginsenoside Rg3

Triterpenoid saponin

6A6B

−9.8

−44.1

Val74, Val76, Ala78, Thr81, Gly84

Quercetin

Flavonol polyphenol

6H6B

−9.4

−41.6

Val74, Val76, Gly84, Ala85, Lys80

Fucoxanthin

Carotenoid (marine)

6H6B

−9.6

−43.2

Val74, Thr75, Val76, Thr81, Ser87

Oleuropein

Secoiridoid glycoside

6SST

−9.6

−43.5

Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Lys80, Ser87

Resveratrol

Stilbene polyphenol

6SST

−9.2

−39.5

Val82, Ser87, Thr75, Ala69

Rosmarinic acid

Phenylpropanoid

6SST

−9.1

−40.2

Val70, Thr75, Val76, Ala85, Gly86

Kaempferol

Flavonol polyphenol

6SST

−9.2

−40.8

Thr75, Val76, Ala78, Ser87, Gly84

β-Caryophyllene

Sesquiterpene

6SST

−8.1

−32.4

Ala69, Val70, Val74, Ile88, Ala78

Piperine

Piperidine alkaloid

6SST

?8.4

?33.8

Val70, Val74, Val76, Ala78, Ala85

Below is a summary table that highlights the most significant docking results, MM-GBSA free binding energy calculations, and important binding interactions for different types of natural compounds studied in scientific literature (Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2019; Das et al., 2025).

5.2 Conservation of Pharmacophoric Interaction Modes in the NAC Region

Analysis of docking poses of cross-compounds identifies conservation of pharmacophoric interaction modes responsible for defining the structural prerequisites for strong binding at the NAC site (Caruana et al., 2011; Ardah et al., 2014).

• Hydrophobic spine interactions: Val70, Val74, Val76, Ala78, Ala69, and Ile88 represent the hydrophobic core interacting with all the strong binders among natural compounds by means of van der Waals and aliphatic stacking. These amino acids contribute to 40–60% of total binding free energy in per-residue MM-GBSA analyses.

• Aromatic π-π stacking: Phenol or planar aromatic rings of natural compound scaffolds form face-to-face or edge-to-edge interactions with Tyr39 and Phe94 and make an important contribution to binding affinity of 2–4 kcal/mol. Geometric planarity of the aromatic scaffold is a fundamental pharmacophoric feature for strong binding.

• Backbone H-bond network: Thr75, Thr81, Ser87, and Gly84 NH/C=O backbone groups act as hydrogen bond donors and acceptors. Formation of multiple H-bonds (from 3 to 6 for each natural compound) represents a characteristic feature of strong binders with MM-GBSA free energies lower than −45 kcal/mol.

•Electrostatic Anchoring

Lysine 80 and Lysine 96 (positively charged under physiological conditions) establish electrostatic interactions with anionic groups such as carboxylates, phosphates, and galloyl oxygens of terpenoids and glycosylated natural products; Glutamate 83 and Aspartate 98 interact with cationic nitrogen atoms of alkaloids, thus ensuring further selectivity of anchoring.

Water-Mediated Interactions

The presence of water molecules that bridge the peripheral regions of the NAC groove assists in establishing hydrogen bonds, especially for glycosylated natural products (e.g., ginsenosides and ole.

5.3 Molecular Dynamics Validation of Binding Affinity

MD simulation studies of high-affinity NC-α-Syn complexes invariably show: (i) stable RMSD profiles of complex backbone over 200 to 500 ns simulations, affirming the dynamic binding affinity; (ii) decreased RMSF for residues Val70 to Val82 within NAC regions between ligand-bound and unbound states, proving quantitative binding-induced stabilization of the aggregation-promoting hydrophobic region; (iii) decreased monomeric α-Syn radius of gyration (Rg) in NC-bound simulations, suggesting compact ligand-mediated conformations unfavorable for fibrillation; (iv) PCA-derived constraints on collective motion during conformational change associated with aggregation; and (v) significant positive Pearson correlations between the MM-PBSA-based binding affinities and in vitro IC?? values for different classes of compounds (r = 0.72–0.85) (Semenyuk, 2022; Waheed et al., 2025). Umbrella sampling simulation studies of EGCG and baicalein bound at the NAC inter-molecular interface estimate the dimerization free energy barriers: both ligands increased the dimerization free energy by 12–18 kJ/mol at pharmacologically relevant concentrations, offering mechanistic validation of early oligomerization inhibition (Bieschke et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2004). Funnel metadynamics simulation studies of berberine suggest a binding free energy of -35.2 ± 2.1 kJ/mol, corroborating MM-GBSA calculations and nanomolar dissociation constants inferred from docking (Penthala et al., 2022)

6. ADMET Profiling and Drug-Likeness Assessment

6.1 CNS Drug-Likeness Criteria for Natural Compounds

Natural Compound

Chemical Class

Target PDB

Docking Score (kcal/mol)

MM-GBSA (kcal/mol)

Primary Interacting Residues

EGCG

Catechin polyphenol

6SST

−10.2

−52.4

Val70, Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Thr81

Dieckol

Phlorotannin (marine)

7Y7A

−11.4

−56.1

Val70, Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Thr81, Ala85

Withanolide A

Steroidal lactone

6SST

−11.2

−53.8

Ala69, Val70, Val74, Val76, Thr75, Thr81

Baicalein

Flavone polyphenol

6SST

−10.8

−48.3

Thr75, Val76, Thr81, Ser87, Gly84

Ursolic acid

Pentacyclic triterpenoid

6SST

−10.4

−49.7

Ala69, Val70, Ile88, Lys80, Lys96

Berberine

Isoquinoline alkaloid

6SST

−10.1

−46.2

Val70, Val74, Val82, Glu83, Asp98

Curcumin

Diarylheptanoid polyphenol

6SST

−9.5

−45.8

Thr75, Val76, Val82, Phe94, Tyr39

Sanguinarine

Benzophenanthridine alkaloid

6SST

−10.5

−47.9

Val74, Val76, Val82, Glu83, Thr81

Ginsenoside Rg3

Triterpenoid saponin

6A6B

−9.8

−44.1

Val74, Val76, Ala78, Thr81, Gly84

Quercetin

Flavonol polyphenol

6H6B

−9.4

−41.6

Val74, Val76, Gly84, Ala85, Lys80

Fucoxanthin

Carotenoid (marine)

6H6B

−9.6

−43.2

Val74, Thr75, Val76, Thr81, Ser87

Oleuropein

Secoiridoid glycoside

6SST

−9.6

−43.5

Thr72, Val74, Ala76, Lys80, Ser87

Resveratrol

Stilbene polyphenol

6SST

−9.2

−39.5

Val82, Ser87, Thr75, Ala69

Rosmarinic acid

Phenylpropanoid

6SST

−9.1

−40.2

Val70, Thr75, Val76, Ala85, Gly86

Kaempferol

Flavonol polyphenol

6SST

−9.2

−40.8

Thr75, Val76, Ala78, Ser87, Gly84

β-Caryophyllene

Sesquiterpene

6SST

−8.1

−32.4

Ala69, Val70, Val74, Ile88, Ala78

Piperine

Piperidine alkaloid

6SST

?8.4

?33.8

Val70, Val74, Val76, Ala78, Ala85

BBB permeation is an absolute necessity for the activity of α-Syn aggregation inhibitors that operate inside the dopaminergic neurons of the SNpc. CNS-specific ADMET criteria have higher threshold values than their peripheral counterparts: MW <450 Da (ideally); logP 1-3; TPSA <90 Ų; HBD ≤3; HBA ≤7; no more than 8 rotatable bonds; and CNS MPO ≥4.0. Numerous high-molecular-weight natural compounds (EGCG, ginsenosides, oleuropein, dieckol) fail to meet at least one CNS criterion, thus requiring nanoscale delivery systems, prodrug strategies, or fragment engineering to reach therapeutic concentrations in the brain (Javed et al., 2019; Alam et al., 2021). The modified version of the ‘beyond the rule of five’ model recognizes that NCs often violate Lipinski’s rule but exert their therapeutic effects via active transport, high affinity, and metabolic activation.[ Baicalein, berberine, resveratrol, and piperine have shown to possess the best CNS drug-likeness properties, which meet all Lipinski’s Ro5 rules, favorable BBB permeation, adequate oral bioavailability, and CNS MPO values ≥4.8 (Javed et al., 2019; Penthala et al., 2022). Curcumin and quercetin fall into an intermediary category where a concerted effort at nanoformulation or molecular modification will enable clinically significant CNS levels. Glycosides with high MW (ginsenosides, oleuropein) and catechins (EGCG) are the hardest nut to crack from a CNS delivery standpoint.

7. Structure-Activity Relationship of Natural Compounds Scaffold 

7.1 Structural Characteristics Determining the Polyphenolic Scaffold

Based on systematic studies of docking between α-Syn and polyphenols, the following principles can be highlighted which determine their activity in inhibition of aggregation of the protein: (i) planar configuration is a key factor, since analogs of flavones and flavonols where conjugation is broken are docked 2-3 times less effectively than the respective compounds; (ii) the number and configuration of the hydroxyl groups define the density of the hydrogen bonding networks with optimal configuration including 3-6 OH phenolic groups; (iii) in addition to hydrophobic effect, galloyl group of EGCG contributes three additional hydrogen bond acceptors; (iv) catechol type with bis-ortho-dihydroxy B-rings is preferable both due to direct effect and capacity to chelate copper ions; (v) saturation of the C ring leads to decrease in planarity and aromaticity and therefore decreases binding up to 3.0 kcal/mol; (vi) methoxy substitutions increase lipophilicity and metabolic stability while preserving the binding ability (Caruana et al., 2011; Ardah et al., 2014; Meng et al., 2010).

7.2 Determinants of Alkaloid Scaffold:

 Binding AffinityIn the case of isoquinoline alkaloids, there is a relationship between binding affinity and (i) the extent of aromaticity of the ring system—complete aromatic structures like berberine have a binding advantage of 1.5–2.5 kcal/mol compared to their less aromatic counterparts canadine due to planarity requirements; (ii) N-methylation and quaternization, which enhance positive charges and electrostatic interactions with Glu83; (iii) methoxylation at C9/C10, which enhances hydrophobic interactions with Val74 and Val76; and (iv) scaffold volume (Hussain et al., 2022; Habtemariam, 2020).

7.3 Determinants of Terpenoid Framework

The pentacyclic triterpenoids illustrate that: (i) a C28 carboxylate group is necessary for electrostatic interactions between the lysine residues Lys80 and Lys96 (esterification decreases the affinity by approximately 2 kcal/mol); (ii) a C2α-hydroxyl group contributes to increased binding through hydrogen bonding with Thr72; (iii) an unsaturated A-ring structure (2-oxo or 3-oxo compounds) improves binding through enhanced π-interaction potential; (iv) the molecule volume of 350-500 ų fits perfectly into the hydrophobic pocket of NAC; and (v) the relative (Akhoon et al., 2016; Wongtrakul et al., 2021)

8. Experimental Validations of Computational Predictions

8.1 In vitro biophysical assays

Quantification of inhibition in Thioflavin T (ThT) Fluorescence Kinetics assays is the main in vitro technique used for validation of computational predictions of anti-aggregant activity. For high-affinity docking hits (predicting binding energy <?8.5 kcal/mol), experimental IC?? values range from 1-50 µM in ThT assays in compound families tested. A correlation (r² = 0.65-0.78) between the strength of docking scores and ThT IC?? values for curated compounds has been shown, validating the prediction capability of docking with known shortcomings of scoring algorithms (Pujols et al., 2018; Linsenmeier et al., 2022). Additional in vitro biophysical assays include: morphological studies using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to characterize aggregates formed in the presence of NCs; dot blot with specific antibodies to determine the type of inhibitory aggregate formed (A11 oligomer selective; OC fibril selective); oligomeric species formation using size exclusion chromatography-multiparameter light scattering (SEC-MALS); and direct binding affinity using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), giving a comparison for KD, ΔH, and ΔS binding energies.

8.2 Cellular and Animal Models Validation

After successful validation at both computation and biochemical levels, the hits undergo validation by translational approach. Common cellular assays utilized for validation include SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells with transient or stable expression of α-Syn (either wild type or A53T mutant); iPSC-derived human dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson’s disease patient harboring mutations in the SNCA locus; primary cultures of rat mesencephalic neuronal-glial co-cultures treated with preformed fibrils (PFFs); and Caenorhabditis elegans expressing α-Syn::GFP reporter in body-wall muscles (Lu et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2010). For in vivo validation, mouse models injected with α-Syn PFFs (via striatum or substantia nigra), Drosophila melanogaster carrying transgenes encoding human α-Syn protein (expressed in dopaminergic neurons) used as a rapid screening platform to assess efficacy and underlying mechanism of action, and rat AAV-induced α-Syn overexpression serve as relevant platforms. The most solid evidences on agreement between computational and experimental approaches involve: baicalein and berberine (anti-aggregation effect validated in vitro, cells and animal experiments and matching predictions for docking analysis) (Zhu et al., 2004; Teng et al., 2016); EGCG and curcumin (significant number of in vitro and cellular studies validating NAC region binding mode) (Bieschke et al., 2010; Pandey et al., 2008); withanolides (promising computational predictions not yet validated experimentally) (Akhoon et al., 2016).

9. Challenges, limitations, and future directions  

9.1 Basic Challenges to Drug Discovery of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein

The intrinsic disorder of α-Syn raises several fundamental challenges for drug discovery that set it apart from traditional structured enzymes or receptors: (i) there is no stable or well-defined binding pocket in monomeric α-Syn, hence requiring ensembles of conformations to be generated rather than optimizing towards one unique conformation; (ii) the existence of more than one form of fibril (rod-form, twister, MSA-like, and DLB-like) each possessing their own druggable surfaces implies that drugs should ideally bind to common motifs found in all polymorphic forms (Pirhaghi et al., 2025; Guerrero-Ferreira et al., 2019); (iii) early stages of oligomer formation that cause the highest level of toxicity still lack knowledge regarding their structures, thus preventing structure-based design of oligomer-specific inhibitors; (iv) PTMs (phosphorylation at Ser129, oxidation of Methionine residues, and truncation of C-terminal residues) observed in disease states alter the folding of the protein and binding site geometry.

9.2 Limitations of Existing Computational Methods

The existing docking pipelines have inherent limitations, which include: (i) conventional scoring functions trained on globular proteins and their ligands provide poor performance on the more open and solvent-exposed NAC interface (Oikawa & Takada, 2024; Boulaamane et al., 2023); (ii) insufficient experimental co-crystals or cryo-EM structures of natural compounds with α-Syn pose a limitation in using machine learning-based approaches, lacking adequate training and testing data; (iii) rigid docking procedures involving individual fibrils do not adequately reflect the dynamic nature of IDPs during early-stage aggregation; (iv) ADMET models based on drug compound libraries fail to cover all possible chemical diversity in complex natural compounds (glycosides, polyketides, terpenoid saponins); and (v) benchmarking positive control data sets for α-Syn aggregation inhibitors are considerably smaller and poorly curated compared to those of well-characterized drug targets.

9.3 Emerging Technologies and Future Directions

The course of development in this area can be described as follows based on technological progress and strategies:

•Cryo-EM co-structure determination: New approaches for determining the co-structure of natural compounds-α-Syn fibrils using cryo-EM will deliver atomic resolution binding mode information, equivalent to that obtained by protein-ligand crystallography. Recently, some research groups have successfully determined sub-3 Å resolution co-structures of amyloid targeting compounds, and using this method for NC lead molecules will revolutionize the accuracy of optimization.

• De novo molecule generation with GNN/transformer models: Using graph neural networks (GNN) and transformers to generate novel scaffolds combining the characteristics of natural products with enhanced α-Syn binding can achieve unprecedented optimization in this area.

• MD sampling for aggregation kinetics: The use of MARTINI coarse-grain MD and metadynamics simulation on µs-to-ms time scales will quantify the NC effects on full aggregation kinetics, which cannot be observed using atomistic MD, providing mechanistic insight into the process of nucleation or elongation inhibition.

• Proteomics-guided polypharmacology profiling: Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) and activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) of NC-treated neuronal cells will allow researchers to obtain the whole spectrum of target engagement sites, thus validating the computational prediction of polypharmacological mechanisms.

• Brain targeting nanoparticle formulation: Transferrin receptor targeting PLGA nanoparticles, exosome-like nanovectors, and nasal-to-brain transport technologies are poised to solve the permeability issues of the BBB associated with TPSA-containing natural products such as EGCG, phlorotannins, and ginsenosides for CNS drug action (Alam et al., 2021; Bhatt et al., 2025).

• Fragment-Based Natural Product Drug Design (FBNPD): Fragmenting complex natural products to identify their smallest active core fragments and further grow the fragments using information from cryo-EM binding and computational scoring is essential for CNS-directed natural product drug discovery.

• Taking the fastest regulatory route to α-Syn disease treatment via drug repurposing: Clinical-safe NCs already have an existing track record of success in treating metabolic syndromes (berberine), anti-inflammatory conditions (curcumin Theracurmin®), and cardiovascular disorders (resveratrol).

CONCLUSION

The present review highlights the scientific rationale and burgeoning body of evidence supporting natural compounds as potential α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors in Parkinson’s disease, which have been prioritized using molecular docking and other computational methods. The unparalleled pharmacological diversity, structural variety, biological evolution to optimize target recognition, and safety records of natural compounds make them ideal candidates for drug discovery efforts to develop disease-modifying PD agents. Among the various natural compound families considered, the polyphenolic group is by far the most widely studied class with respect to computational and experimental validation as inhibitors, showing multi-pharmacophore interactions with the hydrophobic pocket of the NAC domain through aromatic π-stacking, hydrogen bonding, and indirect chelation mechanisms. Alkaloids such as berberine inhibit NAC-region aggregation while also exhibiting pleotropic neuroprotection via MAO-B inhibition, AMPK agonism, and neuroinflammatory modulation. Terpenoids like withanolide A and ursolic acid, as well as marine-derived compounds like dieckol and fucoxanthin, stand out as high-affinity molecules where computational studies far exceed experimental studies. From a methodology standpoint, the incorporation of ensemble docking with multiple cryo-EM fibril polymorphs, MM-GBSA re-scoring, e-pharmacophores, and MD simulation stands as the current cutting edge approach for prioritization of natural compound anti-aggregation leads. The strict application of ADMET filtering of CNS relevance, selecting baicalein, berberine, resveratrol, and piperine as the most translationally relevant candidates, provides a rational framework for prioritizing natural compound development for experimental and clinical applications.   Going forward will require coordinated effort on many fronts, including cryo-EM co-structure determination of NC-α-Syn complexes to ensure the structural basis for optimization; comprehensive ThT, AFM, SPR, and ITC validation of computational leads at highest priority; iPSC and in vivo modeling for biological and therapeutic efficacy; and eventually, well-designed clinical trials in early PD for the most promising natural compounds. The confluence of structure-based drug design, artificial intelligence, CNS drug delivery by nanotechnology, and ever deepening molecular knowledge of synucleinopathies presents a unique opportunity to convert computationally guided leads to an effective disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson’s disease.

REFERENCES

  1. Dorsey, E. R., & Bloem, B. R. (2018). The Parkinson pandemic—A call to action. JAMA Neurology, 75(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3299
  2. Kalia, L. V., & Lang, A. E. (2015). Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet, 386(9996), 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3
  3. Spillantini, M. G., Schmidt, M. L., Lee, V. M.-Y., Trojanowski, J. Q., Jakes, R., & Goedert, M. (1997). Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature, 388(6645), 839–840. https://doi.org/10.1038/42166
  4. Burré, J., Sharma, M., & Südhof, T. C. (2018). Cell biology and pathophysiology of α-synuclein. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 8(3), a024091. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024091
  5. Lashuel, H. A., Overk, C. R., Bhatt, A., & Rana, A. (2013). The many faces of alpha-synuclein: from structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3406
  6. Bengoa-Vergniory, N., Roberts, R. F., Wade-Martins, R., & Alegre-Abarrategui, J. (2017). Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 9(10), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201707163
  7. Connolly, B. S., & Lang, A. E. (2014). Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA, 311(16), 1670–1683. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3654
  8. Bhatt, S., Bhatt, M., Kumar, P., Bhatt, R., Bhatt, A., Agrawal, A., Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, A., & Rana, A. (2022). Alpha-synuclein aggregation pathway in Parkinson’s disease: Current status and novel therapeutic approaches. Cells, 11(12), 1875. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11121875
  9. Ono, K., & Yamada, M. (2012). Antioxidant compounds have potent anti-fibrillogenic and fibril-destabilizing effects for alpha-synuclein fibrils in vitro. Journal of Neurochemistry, 121(6), 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07753
  10. Mani, S., Sevanan, M., Krishnamoorthy, A., & Sekar, S. (2021). A systematic review of molecular approaches that link mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Molecular Biology Reports, 48(8), 5955–5966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06536-5
  11. Kalra, S., Bhatt, M., Goel, A., Agrawal, A., & Bhatt, S. (2023). Pharmacotherapeutics and molecular docking studies of alpha-synuclein modulators as promising therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. Biocell, 47(3), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2022.021224
  12. Guerrero-Munoz, M. J., Castillo-Carranza, D. L., & Kayed, R. (2021). Therapeutic approaches against common structural features of toxic oligomers shared by multiple amyloidogenic proteins. Biochemical Pharmacology, 88(4), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.01.023
  13. Iqbal, J., Abbasi, B. A., Ahmad, R., Batool, R., Mahmood, T., Ali, B., Khalil, A. T., Kanwal, S., Shah, S. A., Alam, M. M., Badshah, H., & Mirza, B. (2021). Natural compounds and their analogues as potent antidotes against the most life threatening viruses: A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.046
  14. Lashuel, H. A., Overk, C. R., Oueslati, A., & Masliah, E. (2013). The many faces of α-synuclein: From structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3406
  15. Snead, D., & Eliezer, D. (2014). Alpha-synuclein function and dysfunction on cellular membranes. Experimental Neurobiology, 23(4), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2014.23.4.292
  16. Zarranz, J. J., Alegre, J., Gómez-Esteban, J. C., Lezcano, E., Ros, R., Ampuero, I., Vidal, L., Hoenicka, J., Rodriguez, O., Atarés, B., Llorens, V., Gomez Tortosa, E., del Ser, T., Muñoz, D. G., & de Yebenes, J. G. (2004). The new mutation, E46K, of alpha-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Annals of Neurology, 55(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10795
  17. Bhatt, M., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, P., & Bhatt, R. (2010). Differential phospholipid binding of α-synuclein variants implicated in Parkinson's disease revealed by solution NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry, 49(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901723p
  18. Das, V., Modarres Mousavi, S. M., Annadurai, N., Sukur, S., Mehrnejad, F., Moradi, S., Malina, L., Kola?íková, M., Ranc, V., Frydrych, I., Kou?il, R., Hosseinkhani, S., Hajdúch, M., & Nikkhah, M. (2025). Hydrophobic residues in the α-synuclein NAC domain drive seed-competent fibril formation and are targeted by peptide inhibitors. FEBS Journal, 292(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.70222
  19. Gallardo, J., Escalona-Noguero, C., & Sot, B. (2020). Role of α-synuclein regions in nucleation and elongation of amyloid fiber assembly. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 11(6), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00483
  20. Martins, G. F., Nascimento, C., & Galamba, N. (2023). Mechanistic insights into polyphenols' aggregation inhibition of α-synuclein and related peptides. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 14(10), 1836–1852. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00162
  21. Oueslati, A., Schneider, B. L., Bhatt, P., & Aebischer, P. (2016). Implication of alpha-synuclein phosphorylation at S129 in synucleinopathies: What have we learned in the last decade? Journal of Neurochemistry, 139(Suppl 1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13265
  22. Kleinknecht, A., Popova, B., Lázaro, D. F., Pinho, R., Valerius, O., Outeiro, T. F., & Braus, G. H. (2016). C-terminal tyrosine residue modifications modulate the protective phosphorylation of serine 129 of α-synuclein in a yeast model of Parkinson's disease. PLOS Genetics, 12(6), e1006098. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006098
  23. Meisl, G., Kirkegaard, J. B., Arosio, P., Michaels, T. C. T., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M., Linse, S., & Knowles, T. P. J. (2016). Molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation from global fitting of kinetic models. Nature Protocols, 11(2), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.010
  24. Flagmeier, P., Meisl, G., Vendruscolo, M., Knowles, T. P. J., Dobson, C. M., Buell, A. K., & Galvagnion, C. (2016). Mutations associated with familial Parkinson's disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of α-synuclein aggregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(37), 10328–10333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604645113
  25. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Lauer, M. E., Riek, R., Britschgi, M., & Stahlberg, H. (2018). Cryo-EM structure of alpha-synuclein fibrils. eLife, 7, e36402. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36402
  26. Li, B., Ge, P., Murray, K. A., Sheth, P., Zhang, M., Nair, G., Sawaya, M. R., Shin, W. S., Boyer, D. R., Ye, S., Eisenberg, D. S., Zhou, Z. H., & Jiang, L. (2018). Cryo-EM of full-length α-synuclein reveals fibril polymorphs with a common structural kernel. Nature Communications, 9, 3609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05971-2
  27. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A. A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  28. Cascella, R., Chen, S. W., Bigi, A., Camino, J. D., Xu, C. K., Dobson, C. M., Chiti, F., Cremades, N., & Cecchi, C. (2021). The release of toxic oligomers from α-synuclein fibrils induces dysfunction in neuronal cells. Nature Communications, 12, 1814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21937-3
  29. Bengoa-Vergniory, N., Roberts, R. F., Wade-Martins, R., & Alegre-Abarrategui, J. (2017). Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 5, 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0512-1
  30. Peng, C., Gathagan, R. J., & Bhatt, D. L. (2020). The role of α-synuclein oligomers in Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 13, 602445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.602445
  31. Braak, H., Del Tredici, K., Rüb, U., de Vos, R. A., Jansen Steur, E. N., & Braak, E. (2003). Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 24(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9
  32. Brundin, P., & Bhatt, R. (2018). The concept of alpha-synuclein as a prion-like protein: Ten years after. Cell and Tissue Research, 373(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2814-1
  33. Arena, G., Pappalardo, G., Sovago, I., & Rizzarelli, E. (2021). Cu2+, Ca2+, and methionine oxidation expose the hydrophobic α-synuclein NAC domain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010326
  34. Camponeschi, F., Gaggelli, E., Gaggelli, N., & Valensin, G. (2013). Copper(I)-α-synuclein interaction: Structural description of two independent and competing metal binding sites. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 4(3), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn400006b
  35. Fonseca-Ornelas, L., Eisbach, S. E., Paulat, M., Giller, K., Fernández, C. O., Outeiro, T. F., Becker, S., & Zweckstetter, M. (2014). Small molecule-mediated stabilization of vesicle-associated helical α-synuclein inhibits pathogenic misfolding and aggregation. Nature Communications, 5, 5857. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6857
  36. Dvinskikh, S. V., & Sandström, C. (2011). The N-terminus of the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein triggers membrane binding and helix folding. Biochemistry, 50(18), 3723–3731. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi101802k
  37. Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Bieschke, J., Boeddrich, A., Herbst, M., Masino, L., Lurz, R., Engemann, S., Pastore, A., & Wanker, E. E. (2008). EGCG redirects amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 15(6), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1437
  38. Bieschke, J., Russ, J., Friedrich, R. P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Wobst, H., Neugebauer, K., & Wanker, E. E. (2010). EGCG remodels mature α-synuclein and amyloid-β fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910723107
  39. Lorenzen, N., Nielsen, S. B., Yoshimura, Y., Vad, B. S., Andersen, C. B., Betzer, C., Kaspersen, J. D., Christiansen, G., Pedersen, J. S., Jensen, P. H., Mulder, F. A., & Otzen, D. E. (2014). How epigallocatechin gallate can inhibit alpha-synuclein oligomer toxicity in vitro. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(31), 21299–21310. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.554667
  40. Qing, H., McGeer, P. L., Zhang, Y., Yang, Q., Dai, R., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Wong, W., Xu, Y., & Quan, Z. (2009). Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibits alpha-synuclein aggregation: A potential agent for Parkinson's disease. Neurochemical Research, 34(10), 1828–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-016-1995-9
  41. Pandey, N., Strider, J., Nolan, W. C., Yan, S. X., & Galvin, J. E. (2008). Curcumin inhibits aggregation of α-synuclein. Acta Neuropathologica, 115(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0332-4
  42. Ahmad, B., & Lapidus, L. J. (2012). Curcumin prevents aggregation in α-synuclein by increasing reconfiguration rate. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(12), 9193–9199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.325548
  43. Wang, Z., Chen, H., Wang, J., & Ye, J. (2024). Curcumin inhibits α-synuclein aggregation by acting on liquid–liquid phase transition. Foods, 13(9), 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091287
  44. Zhu, M., Rajamani, S., Kaylor, J., Han, S., Zhou, F., & Fink, A. L. (2004). The flavonoid baicalein inhibits fibrillation of α-synuclein and disaggregates existing fibrils. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(26), 26846–26857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403129200
  45. Masuda, M., Suzuki, N., Taniguchi, S., Oikawa, T., Nonaka, T., Iwatsubo, T., Hisanaga, S., Goedert, M., & Hasegawa, M. (2006). Small molecule inhibitors of alpha-synuclein filament assembly. Biochemistry, 45(19), 6085–6094. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0600749
  46. Lu, J. H., Ardah, M. T., Durairajan, S. S., Liu, L. F., Xie, L. X., Fong, W. F., Hasan, M. Y., Huang, J. D., El-Agnaf, O. M., & Li, M. (2011). Baicalein inhibits formation of α-synuclein oligomers within living cells and prevents Aβ peptide fibrillation and oligomerisation. ChemBioChem, 12(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000604
  47. Caruana, M., Hogen, T., Levin, J., Hillmer, A., Giese, A., & Vassallo, N. (2011). Inhibition and disaggregation of α-synuclein oligomers by natural polyphenolic compounds. FEBS Letters, 585(8), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.046
  48. Wu, Y., Li, X., Zhu, J. X., Xie, W., Le, W., Fan, Z., Jankovic, J., & Pan, T. (2011). Resveratrol-activated AMPK/SIRT1/autophagy in cellular models of Parkinson's disease. Neurosignals, 19(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328516
  49. Albani, D., Polito, L., Batelli, S., De Mauro, S., Fracasso, C., Martelli, G., Colombo, L., Manzoni, C., Salmona, M., Caccia, S., Negro, A., & Forloni, G. (2009). The SIRT1 activator resveratrol protects SK-N-BE cells from oxidative stress and against toxicity caused by alpha-synuclein or amyloid-beta (1-42) peptide. Journal of Neurochemistry, 110(4), 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06228.x
  50. Wang, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y., Xue, J., & Li, H. (2013). Oxidized quercetin inhibits α-synuclein fibrillization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – Proteins and Proteomics, 1834(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.08.013
  51. Altay, M. F., Öztürk, N., & Öztürk, M. (2023). Impact of the flavonoid quercetin on β-amyloid aggregation revealed by intrinsic fluorescence. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 14(5), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00741
  52. Huang, S., Liu, H., Lin, Y., Liu, M., Li, Y., Mao, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Ye, P., Ding, L., Zhu, Z., Yang, X., Chen, C., Zhu, X., Huang, X., Guo, W., Xu, P., & Lu, L. (2021). Berberine protects against NLRP3 inflammasome via ameliorating autophagic impairment in MPTP-induced Parkinson's disease model. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, 618787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.618787
  53. Yang, K., Lv, Z., Zhao, W., Lai, G., Zheng, C., Qi, F., Zhao, C., Hu, K., Chen, X., Fu, F., Li, J., Xie, G., Wang, H., Wu, X., & Zheng, W. (2024). The potential of natural products to inhibit abnormal aggregation of α-synuclein in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, 1468850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1468850
  54. Shoba, G., Joy, D., Joseph, T., Majeed, M., Rajendran, R., & Srinivas, P. S. (1998). Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Medica, 64(4), 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-957450
  55. Bhardwaj, R. K., Glaeser, H., Becquemont, L., Klotz, U., Gupta, S. K., & Fromm, M. F. (2002). Piperine, a major constituent of black pepper, inhibits human P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 302(2), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.102.034728
  56. Isacchi, B., Bergonzi, M. C., Guan, Z., Cao, Y., & Bilia, A. R. (2022). Ursolic acid and oleanolic acid: Therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochemistry International, 155, 105310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105310
  57. Akhoon, B. A., Pandey, S., Tiwari, S., Pandey, R., Bhatt, R., & Bhatt, M. (2016). Withanolide A offers neuroprotection, ameliorates stress resistance and prolongs the life expectancy of Caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental Gerontology, 78, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.03.003
  58. Zhang, C., Li, C., Chen, S., Li, Z., Ma, L., Jia, X., Wang, K., Bao, J., Liang, Y., Chen, M., Cui, Y., Huang, X., Liu, J., Bhatt, D. L., Su, H., & Lee, S. M. Y. (2022). Advances in fucoxanthin chemistry and management of neurodegenerative diseases. Phytomedicine, 104, 154333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154333
  59. Cha, S. H., Heo, S. J., Jeon, Y. J., & Park, S. M. (2016). Dieckol, an edible seaweed polyphenol, retards rotenone-induced neurotoxicity and α-synuclein aggregation in human dopaminergic neuronal cells. RSC Advances, 6(111), 110040–110046. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA21697H
  60. Kim, J. A., Park, S. K., Kang, J. Y., Park, S. B., & Lee, S. C. (2019). Neuroprotective effects of phlorotannin-rich extract from brown seaweed Ecklonia cava on neuronal PC-12 and SH-SY5Y cells with oxidative stress. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29(11), 1742–1751. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1910.10068
  61. Pruccoli, L., Balducci, M., Pagliarani, B., & Tarozzi, A. (2024). Antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of fucoxanthin and its metabolite fucoxanthinol: A comparative in vitro study. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(6), 5736–5751. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46060357
  62. Ono, K., Hirohata, M., & Yamada, M. (2012). Anti-aggregation effects of phenolic compounds on α-synuclein. Molecules, 17(7), 7798–7817. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17077798
  63. Ardah, M. T., Paleologou, K. E., Lv, G., Abul Khair, S. B., Kazim, A. S., Minhas, S. T., Al-Tel, T. H., Al-Hayani, A. A., Haque, M. E., Eliezer, D., & El-Agnaf, O. M. (2015). Structure–activity relationship of phenolic acid inhibitors of α-synuclein fibril formation and toxicity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00197
  64. Kabra, A., Martins, N., Chacko, C. M., & Bhatt, R. (2019). Plant extracts and phytochemicals targeting α-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson's disease models. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01555
  65. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Lauer, M. E., Riek, R., Britschgi, M., & Stahlberg, H. (2018). Cryo-EM structure of alpha-synuclein fibrils. eLife, 7, e36402. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36402
  66. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A. A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  67. Olsson, M. H. M., Søndergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M., & Jensen, J. H. (2011). PROPKA3: Consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 7(2), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100578z
  68. Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2010). MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 66(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073
  69. Williams, C. J., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Prisant, M. G., Videau, L. L., Deis, L. N., Verma, V., Keedy, D. A., Hintze, B. J., Chen, V. B., Jain, S., Lewis, S. M., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J., Adams, P. D., Lovell, S. C., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2018). MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Science, 27(1), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3330
  70. Fusco, G., De Simone, A., Gopinath, T., Vostrikov, V., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M., & Veglia, G. (2014). Direct observation of the three regions in α-synuclein that determine its membrane-bound behaviour. Nature Communications, 5, 3827. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4827
  71. Sorokina, M., Merseburger, P., Rajan, K., Yirik, M. A., & Steinbeck, C. (2021). COCONUT online: COlleCtion of Open Natural prodUcTs database. Journal of Cheminformatics, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00478-9
  72. Günther, S., Kuhn, M., Dunkel, M., Campillos, M., Senger, C., Petsalaki, E., Ahmed, J., Garcia, E. G., Saunders, R., Hoefler, M., Pastre, J., Pielcke, A., Caetano-Anolles, D., Mateo, N. R., Dietz, K., Wolf, A., Frey, E., Wiegand, I., Loeffler, M., … Preissner, R. (2022). SuperNatural 3.0 – a database of natural products and natural product-based derivatives. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D702–D709. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab939
  73. Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., Shaw, D. E., Francis, P., & Shenkin, P. S. (2004). Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47(7), 1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0306430
  74. Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006). Extra precision Glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(21), 6177–6196. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o
  75. McNutt, A. T., Francoeur, P., Aggarwal, R., Masuda, T., Meli, R., Ragoza, M., Sunseri, J., & Koes, D. R. (2021). GNINA 1.0: Molecular docking with deep learning. Journal of Cheminformatics, 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2
  76. Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015). The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 10(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
  77. Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011). Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 51(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100275a
  78. Salentin, S., Schreiber, S., Haupt, V. J., Adasme, M. F., & Schroeder, M. (2015). PLIP: Fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Research, 43(W1), W443–W447. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv315
  79. Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2021). UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Science, 30(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3943
  80. Dixon, S. L., Smondyrev, A. M., Knoll, E. H., Rao, S. N., Shaw, D. E., & Friesner, R. A. (2006). PHASE: A novel approach to pharmacophore modeling and 3D database searching. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 20(10–11), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9087-6
  81. Wieder, M., Garon, A., Perricone, U., Boresch, S., Seidel, T., Almerico, A. M., & Langer, T. (2017). Common hits approach: Combining pharmacophore modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 57(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00674
  82. Yang, J., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Qin, L., Wen, H., & Tang, Y. (2021). Pharmacophore modeling and 3D-QSAR study for the design of novel α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 27(9), 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04881-3
  83. Seidel, T., Ibis, G., Bendix, F., & Wolber, G. (2020). Strategies for 3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 36–37, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.003
  84. Bussi, G., & Laio, A. (2020). Using metadynamics to explore complex free-energy landscapes. Nature Reviews Physics, 2(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0153-0
  85. Miao, Y., Feher, V. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2015). Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 11(8), 3584–3595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436
  86. Javed, H., Nagoor Meeran, M. F., Azimullah, S., Adem, A., Sadek, B., & Ojha, S. K. (2019). Plant extracts and phytochemicals targeting alpha-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson's disease models. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01555
  87. Alam, P., Beg, S., Jafar, T., Rahman, M. A., Alqahtani, S. S., Almarfadi, O. M., & Singh, S. (2021). Nano-enabled drug delivery systems for the management of Parkinson's disease: Current advances and future challenges. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 33, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2021.102350
  88. Penthala, N. R., Lamsal, R., Boyd, L. D., & Crooks, P. A. (2022). Berberine analogs as inhibitors of α-synuclein aggregation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 55, 128456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128456
  89. Caruana, M., Högen, T., Levin, J., Hillmer, A., Giese, A., & Vassallo, N. (2011). Inhibition and disaggregation of α-synuclein oligomers by natural polyphenolic compounds. FEBS Letters, 585(8), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.046
  90. Ardah, M. T., Paleologou, K. E., Lv, G., Abul Khair, S. B., Kazim, A. S., Minhas, S. T., Al-Tel, T. H., Al-Hayani, A. A., Haque, M. E., Bhatt, D. L., & El-Agnaf, O. M. A. (2014). Structure activity relationship of phenolic acid inhibitors of α-synuclein fibril formation and toxicity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00197
  91. Meng, X., Munishkina, L. A., Fink, A. L., & Uversky, V. N. (2010). Effects of various flavonoids on the alpha-synuclein fibrillation process. Parkinson's Disease, 2010, 650794. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/650794
  92. Habtemariam, S. (2020). Berberine pharmacology and the gut microbiota: A hidden therapeutic link. Pharmacological Research, 155, 104722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104722
  93. Hussain, G., Wang, J., Rasul, A., Anwar, H., Qu, M., Jiang, T., & Li, T. (2022). Can berberine serve as a new therapy for Parkinson's disease? Neurotoxicity Research, 40(6), 1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-022-00526-2
  94. Akhoon, B. A., Pandey, S., Tiwari, S., Pandey, R. (2016). Withanolide A offers neuroprotection, reduces stress, and improves learning and memory in the Caenorhabditis elegans model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 44, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.04.004
  95. Wongtrakul, J., Thongtan, T., Kumrapich, B., Saisawang, C., & Ketterman, A. J. (2021). Neuroprotective effects of Withania somnifera in the SH-SY5Y Parkinson cell model. Heliyon, 7(10), e08172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08172
  96. Pujols, J., Peña-Díaz, S., Pallares, I., & Ventura, S. (2018). α-Synuclein aggregation monitored by Thioflavin T fluorescence assay. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1779, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_32
  97. Linsenmeier, M., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., & Bhatt, D. L. (2022). Two-step screening method to identify α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors for Parkinson's disease. Scientific Reports, 12, 164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04086-3
  98. Lu, J.-H., Ardah, M. T., Durairajan, S. S. K., Liu, L.-F., Xie, L.-X., Fong, W.-F. D., Hasan, M. Y., Huang, J.-D., El-Agnaf, O. M. A., & Li, M. (2011). Baicalein inhibits formation of alpha-synuclein oligomers within living cells and prevents Abeta peptide fibrillation and oligomerisation. ChemBioChem, 12(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000604
  99. Jiang, M., Porat-Shliom, Y., Pei, Z., Cheng, Y., Xiang, L., Sommers, K., Li, Q., Bhatt, D. L., Huganir, R. L., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., & Ross, C. A. (2010). Baicalein reduces E46K α-synuclein aggregation in vitro and protects cells against E46K α-synuclein toxicity in cell models of familiar Parkinsonism. Journal of Neurochemistry, 114(2), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06752.x
  100. Zhu, M., Rajamani, S., Kaylor, J., Han, S., Zhou, F., & Fink, A. L. (2004). The flavonoid baicalein inhibits fibrillation of alpha-synuclein and disaggregates existing fibrils. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(26), 26846–26857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403129200
  101. Teng, Y., Zhao, J., Ding, L., Ding, Y., & Zhou, P. (2016). Complex of EGCG with Cu(II) suppresses amyloid aggregation and Cu(II)-induced cytotoxicity of α-synuclein. Molecules, 24(2), 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162940
  102. Bieschke, J., Russ, J., Friedrich, R. P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Wobst, H., Neugebauer, K., & Wanker, E. E. (2010). EGCG remodels mature alpha-synuclein and amyloid-beta fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(17), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910723107
  103. Pandey, N., Strider, J., Nolan, W. C., Yan, S. X., & Galvin, J. E. (2008). Curcumin inhibits aggregation of alpha-synuclein. Acta Neuropathologica, 115(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0332-4
  104. Pirhaghi, M., Mamashli, F., Davaeil, B., Mohammad-Zaheri, M., Mousavi-Jarrahi, Z., Tatzelt, J., & Saboury, A. A. (2025). Hidden faces of alpha-synuclein: Cryo-EM revelation of fibril polymorphs driven by disease, mutations, and PTMs. BBA Advances, 7, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadva.2025.100179
  105. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A.-A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  106. Oikawa, H., & Takada, S. (2024). An integrated machine learning approach delineates an entropic expansion mechanism for the binding of a small molecule to α-synuclein. Nature Communications, 15, 9715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53933-6
  107. Boulaamane, Y., Ibrahim, M. A., Britel, M. R., & Maurady, A. (2023). Probing the molecular mechanisms of α-synuclein inhibitors unveils promising natural candidates through machine-learning QSAR, pharmacophore modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations. Molecular Diversity, 28, 753–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-023-10691-x
  108. Bhatt, R., Ashara, K., Thakkar, M., & Patel, M. (2025). Revamping Parkinson's disease therapy using PLGA-based drug delivery systems. npj Parkinson's Disease. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00959-y

Reference

  1. Dorsey, E. R., & Bloem, B. R. (2018). The Parkinson pandemic—A call to action. JAMA Neurology, 75(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3299
  2. Kalia, L. V., & Lang, A. E. (2015). Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet, 386(9996), 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3
  3. Spillantini, M. G., Schmidt, M. L., Lee, V. M.-Y., Trojanowski, J. Q., Jakes, R., & Goedert, M. (1997). Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature, 388(6645), 839–840. https://doi.org/10.1038/42166
  4. Burré, J., Sharma, M., & Südhof, T. C. (2018). Cell biology and pathophysiology of α-synuclein. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 8(3), a024091. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024091
  5. Lashuel, H. A., Overk, C. R., Bhatt, A., & Rana, A. (2013). The many faces of alpha-synuclein: from structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3406
  6. Bengoa-Vergniory, N., Roberts, R. F., Wade-Martins, R., & Alegre-Abarrategui, J. (2017). Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 9(10), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201707163
  7. Connolly, B. S., & Lang, A. E. (2014). Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA, 311(16), 1670–1683. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3654
  8. Bhatt, S., Bhatt, M., Kumar, P., Bhatt, R., Bhatt, A., Agrawal, A., Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, A., & Rana, A. (2022). Alpha-synuclein aggregation pathway in Parkinson’s disease: Current status and novel therapeutic approaches. Cells, 11(12), 1875. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11121875
  9. Ono, K., & Yamada, M. (2012). Antioxidant compounds have potent anti-fibrillogenic and fibril-destabilizing effects for alpha-synuclein fibrils in vitro. Journal of Neurochemistry, 121(6), 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07753
  10. Mani, S., Sevanan, M., Krishnamoorthy, A., & Sekar, S. (2021). A systematic review of molecular approaches that link mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Molecular Biology Reports, 48(8), 5955–5966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06536-5
  11. Kalra, S., Bhatt, M., Goel, A., Agrawal, A., & Bhatt, S. (2023). Pharmacotherapeutics and molecular docking studies of alpha-synuclein modulators as promising therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. Biocell, 47(3), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2022.021224
  12. Guerrero-Munoz, M. J., Castillo-Carranza, D. L., & Kayed, R. (2021). Therapeutic approaches against common structural features of toxic oligomers shared by multiple amyloidogenic proteins. Biochemical Pharmacology, 88(4), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.01.023
  13. Iqbal, J., Abbasi, B. A., Ahmad, R., Batool, R., Mahmood, T., Ali, B., Khalil, A. T., Kanwal, S., Shah, S. A., Alam, M. M., Badshah, H., & Mirza, B. (2021). Natural compounds and their analogues as potent antidotes against the most life threatening viruses: A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.046
  14. Lashuel, H. A., Overk, C. R., Oueslati, A., & Masliah, E. (2013). The many faces of α-synuclein: From structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3406
  15. Snead, D., & Eliezer, D. (2014). Alpha-synuclein function and dysfunction on cellular membranes. Experimental Neurobiology, 23(4), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2014.23.4.292
  16. Zarranz, J. J., Alegre, J., Gómez-Esteban, J. C., Lezcano, E., Ros, R., Ampuero, I., Vidal, L., Hoenicka, J., Rodriguez, O., Atarés, B., Llorens, V., Gomez Tortosa, E., del Ser, T., Muñoz, D. G., & de Yebenes, J. G. (2004). The new mutation, E46K, of alpha-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Annals of Neurology, 55(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10795
  17. Bhatt, M., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, P., & Bhatt, R. (2010). Differential phospholipid binding of α-synuclein variants implicated in Parkinson's disease revealed by solution NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry, 49(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901723p
  18. Das, V., Modarres Mousavi, S. M., Annadurai, N., Sukur, S., Mehrnejad, F., Moradi, S., Malina, L., Kola?íková, M., Ranc, V., Frydrych, I., Kou?il, R., Hosseinkhani, S., Hajdúch, M., & Nikkhah, M. (2025). Hydrophobic residues in the α-synuclein NAC domain drive seed-competent fibril formation and are targeted by peptide inhibitors. FEBS Journal, 292(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.70222
  19. Gallardo, J., Escalona-Noguero, C., & Sot, B. (2020). Role of α-synuclein regions in nucleation and elongation of amyloid fiber assembly. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 11(6), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00483
  20. Martins, G. F., Nascimento, C., & Galamba, N. (2023). Mechanistic insights into polyphenols' aggregation inhibition of α-synuclein and related peptides. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 14(10), 1836–1852. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00162
  21. Oueslati, A., Schneider, B. L., Bhatt, P., & Aebischer, P. (2016). Implication of alpha-synuclein phosphorylation at S129 in synucleinopathies: What have we learned in the last decade? Journal of Neurochemistry, 139(Suppl 1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13265
  22. Kleinknecht, A., Popova, B., Lázaro, D. F., Pinho, R., Valerius, O., Outeiro, T. F., & Braus, G. H. (2016). C-terminal tyrosine residue modifications modulate the protective phosphorylation of serine 129 of α-synuclein in a yeast model of Parkinson's disease. PLOS Genetics, 12(6), e1006098. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006098
  23. Meisl, G., Kirkegaard, J. B., Arosio, P., Michaels, T. C. T., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M., Linse, S., & Knowles, T. P. J. (2016). Molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation from global fitting of kinetic models. Nature Protocols, 11(2), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.010
  24. Flagmeier, P., Meisl, G., Vendruscolo, M., Knowles, T. P. J., Dobson, C. M., Buell, A. K., & Galvagnion, C. (2016). Mutations associated with familial Parkinson's disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of α-synuclein aggregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(37), 10328–10333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604645113
  25. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Lauer, M. E., Riek, R., Britschgi, M., & Stahlberg, H. (2018). Cryo-EM structure of alpha-synuclein fibrils. eLife, 7, e36402. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36402
  26. Li, B., Ge, P., Murray, K. A., Sheth, P., Zhang, M., Nair, G., Sawaya, M. R., Shin, W. S., Boyer, D. R., Ye, S., Eisenberg, D. S., Zhou, Z. H., & Jiang, L. (2018). Cryo-EM of full-length α-synuclein reveals fibril polymorphs with a common structural kernel. Nature Communications, 9, 3609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05971-2
  27. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A. A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  28. Cascella, R., Chen, S. W., Bigi, A., Camino, J. D., Xu, C. K., Dobson, C. M., Chiti, F., Cremades, N., & Cecchi, C. (2021). The release of toxic oligomers from α-synuclein fibrils induces dysfunction in neuronal cells. Nature Communications, 12, 1814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21937-3
  29. Bengoa-Vergniory, N., Roberts, R. F., Wade-Martins, R., & Alegre-Abarrategui, J. (2017). Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 5, 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0512-1
  30. Peng, C., Gathagan, R. J., & Bhatt, D. L. (2020). The role of α-synuclein oligomers in Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 13, 602445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.602445
  31. Braak, H., Del Tredici, K., Rüb, U., de Vos, R. A., Jansen Steur, E. N., & Braak, E. (2003). Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 24(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9
  32. Brundin, P., & Bhatt, R. (2018). The concept of alpha-synuclein as a prion-like protein: Ten years after. Cell and Tissue Research, 373(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2814-1
  33. Arena, G., Pappalardo, G., Sovago, I., & Rizzarelli, E. (2021). Cu2+, Ca2+, and methionine oxidation expose the hydrophobic α-synuclein NAC domain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010326
  34. Camponeschi, F., Gaggelli, E., Gaggelli, N., & Valensin, G. (2013). Copper(I)-α-synuclein interaction: Structural description of two independent and competing metal binding sites. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 4(3), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn400006b
  35. Fonseca-Ornelas, L., Eisbach, S. E., Paulat, M., Giller, K., Fernández, C. O., Outeiro, T. F., Becker, S., & Zweckstetter, M. (2014). Small molecule-mediated stabilization of vesicle-associated helical α-synuclein inhibits pathogenic misfolding and aggregation. Nature Communications, 5, 5857. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6857
  36. Dvinskikh, S. V., & Sandström, C. (2011). The N-terminus of the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein triggers membrane binding and helix folding. Biochemistry, 50(18), 3723–3731. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi101802k
  37. Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Bieschke, J., Boeddrich, A., Herbst, M., Masino, L., Lurz, R., Engemann, S., Pastore, A., & Wanker, E. E. (2008). EGCG redirects amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 15(6), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1437
  38. Bieschke, J., Russ, J., Friedrich, R. P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Wobst, H., Neugebauer, K., & Wanker, E. E. (2010). EGCG remodels mature α-synuclein and amyloid-β fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910723107
  39. Lorenzen, N., Nielsen, S. B., Yoshimura, Y., Vad, B. S., Andersen, C. B., Betzer, C., Kaspersen, J. D., Christiansen, G., Pedersen, J. S., Jensen, P. H., Mulder, F. A., & Otzen, D. E. (2014). How epigallocatechin gallate can inhibit alpha-synuclein oligomer toxicity in vitro. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(31), 21299–21310. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.554667
  40. Qing, H., McGeer, P. L., Zhang, Y., Yang, Q., Dai, R., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Wong, W., Xu, Y., & Quan, Z. (2009). Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibits alpha-synuclein aggregation: A potential agent for Parkinson's disease. Neurochemical Research, 34(10), 1828–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-016-1995-9
  41. Pandey, N., Strider, J., Nolan, W. C., Yan, S. X., & Galvin, J. E. (2008). Curcumin inhibits aggregation of α-synuclein. Acta Neuropathologica, 115(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0332-4
  42. Ahmad, B., & Lapidus, L. J. (2012). Curcumin prevents aggregation in α-synuclein by increasing reconfiguration rate. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(12), 9193–9199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.325548
  43. Wang, Z., Chen, H., Wang, J., & Ye, J. (2024). Curcumin inhibits α-synuclein aggregation by acting on liquid–liquid phase transition. Foods, 13(9), 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091287
  44. Zhu, M., Rajamani, S., Kaylor, J., Han, S., Zhou, F., & Fink, A. L. (2004). The flavonoid baicalein inhibits fibrillation of α-synuclein and disaggregates existing fibrils. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(26), 26846–26857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403129200
  45. Masuda, M., Suzuki, N., Taniguchi, S., Oikawa, T., Nonaka, T., Iwatsubo, T., Hisanaga, S., Goedert, M., & Hasegawa, M. (2006). Small molecule inhibitors of alpha-synuclein filament assembly. Biochemistry, 45(19), 6085–6094. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0600749
  46. Lu, J. H., Ardah, M. T., Durairajan, S. S., Liu, L. F., Xie, L. X., Fong, W. F., Hasan, M. Y., Huang, J. D., El-Agnaf, O. M., & Li, M. (2011). Baicalein inhibits formation of α-synuclein oligomers within living cells and prevents Aβ peptide fibrillation and oligomerisation. ChemBioChem, 12(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000604
  47. Caruana, M., Hogen, T., Levin, J., Hillmer, A., Giese, A., & Vassallo, N. (2011). Inhibition and disaggregation of α-synuclein oligomers by natural polyphenolic compounds. FEBS Letters, 585(8), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.046
  48. Wu, Y., Li, X., Zhu, J. X., Xie, W., Le, W., Fan, Z., Jankovic, J., & Pan, T. (2011). Resveratrol-activated AMPK/SIRT1/autophagy in cellular models of Parkinson's disease. Neurosignals, 19(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328516
  49. Albani, D., Polito, L., Batelli, S., De Mauro, S., Fracasso, C., Martelli, G., Colombo, L., Manzoni, C., Salmona, M., Caccia, S., Negro, A., & Forloni, G. (2009). The SIRT1 activator resveratrol protects SK-N-BE cells from oxidative stress and against toxicity caused by alpha-synuclein or amyloid-beta (1-42) peptide. Journal of Neurochemistry, 110(4), 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06228.x
  50. Wang, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y., Xue, J., & Li, H. (2013). Oxidized quercetin inhibits α-synuclein fibrillization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – Proteins and Proteomics, 1834(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.08.013
  51. Altay, M. F., Öztürk, N., & Öztürk, M. (2023). Impact of the flavonoid quercetin on β-amyloid aggregation revealed by intrinsic fluorescence. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 14(5), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00741
  52. Huang, S., Liu, H., Lin, Y., Liu, M., Li, Y., Mao, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Ye, P., Ding, L., Zhu, Z., Yang, X., Chen, C., Zhu, X., Huang, X., Guo, W., Xu, P., & Lu, L. (2021). Berberine protects against NLRP3 inflammasome via ameliorating autophagic impairment in MPTP-induced Parkinson's disease model. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, 618787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.618787
  53. Yang, K., Lv, Z., Zhao, W., Lai, G., Zheng, C., Qi, F., Zhao, C., Hu, K., Chen, X., Fu, F., Li, J., Xie, G., Wang, H., Wu, X., & Zheng, W. (2024). The potential of natural products to inhibit abnormal aggregation of α-synuclein in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, 1468850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1468850
  54. Shoba, G., Joy, D., Joseph, T., Majeed, M., Rajendran, R., & Srinivas, P. S. (1998). Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Medica, 64(4), 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-957450
  55. Bhardwaj, R. K., Glaeser, H., Becquemont, L., Klotz, U., Gupta, S. K., & Fromm, M. F. (2002). Piperine, a major constituent of black pepper, inhibits human P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 302(2), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.102.034728
  56. Isacchi, B., Bergonzi, M. C., Guan, Z., Cao, Y., & Bilia, A. R. (2022). Ursolic acid and oleanolic acid: Therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochemistry International, 155, 105310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105310
  57. Akhoon, B. A., Pandey, S., Tiwari, S., Pandey, R., Bhatt, R., & Bhatt, M. (2016). Withanolide A offers neuroprotection, ameliorates stress resistance and prolongs the life expectancy of Caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental Gerontology, 78, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.03.003
  58. Zhang, C., Li, C., Chen, S., Li, Z., Ma, L., Jia, X., Wang, K., Bao, J., Liang, Y., Chen, M., Cui, Y., Huang, X., Liu, J., Bhatt, D. L., Su, H., & Lee, S. M. Y. (2022). Advances in fucoxanthin chemistry and management of neurodegenerative diseases. Phytomedicine, 104, 154333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154333
  59. Cha, S. H., Heo, S. J., Jeon, Y. J., & Park, S. M. (2016). Dieckol, an edible seaweed polyphenol, retards rotenone-induced neurotoxicity and α-synuclein aggregation in human dopaminergic neuronal cells. RSC Advances, 6(111), 110040–110046. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA21697H
  60. Kim, J. A., Park, S. K., Kang, J. Y., Park, S. B., & Lee, S. C. (2019). Neuroprotective effects of phlorotannin-rich extract from brown seaweed Ecklonia cava on neuronal PC-12 and SH-SY5Y cells with oxidative stress. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29(11), 1742–1751. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1910.10068
  61. Pruccoli, L., Balducci, M., Pagliarani, B., & Tarozzi, A. (2024). Antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of fucoxanthin and its metabolite fucoxanthinol: A comparative in vitro study. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(6), 5736–5751. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46060357
  62. Ono, K., Hirohata, M., & Yamada, M. (2012). Anti-aggregation effects of phenolic compounds on α-synuclein. Molecules, 17(7), 7798–7817. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17077798
  63. Ardah, M. T., Paleologou, K. E., Lv, G., Abul Khair, S. B., Kazim, A. S., Minhas, S. T., Al-Tel, T. H., Al-Hayani, A. A., Haque, M. E., Eliezer, D., & El-Agnaf, O. M. (2015). Structure–activity relationship of phenolic acid inhibitors of α-synuclein fibril formation and toxicity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00197
  64. Kabra, A., Martins, N., Chacko, C. M., & Bhatt, R. (2019). Plant extracts and phytochemicals targeting α-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson's disease models. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01555
  65. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Lauer, M. E., Riek, R., Britschgi, M., & Stahlberg, H. (2018). Cryo-EM structure of alpha-synuclein fibrils. eLife, 7, e36402. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36402
  66. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A. A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  67. Olsson, M. H. M., Søndergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M., & Jensen, J. H. (2011). PROPKA3: Consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 7(2), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100578z
  68. Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2010). MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 66(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073
  69. Williams, C. J., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Prisant, M. G., Videau, L. L., Deis, L. N., Verma, V., Keedy, D. A., Hintze, B. J., Chen, V. B., Jain, S., Lewis, S. M., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J., Adams, P. D., Lovell, S. C., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2018). MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Science, 27(1), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3330
  70. Fusco, G., De Simone, A., Gopinath, T., Vostrikov, V., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M., & Veglia, G. (2014). Direct observation of the three regions in α-synuclein that determine its membrane-bound behaviour. Nature Communications, 5, 3827. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4827
  71. Sorokina, M., Merseburger, P., Rajan, K., Yirik, M. A., & Steinbeck, C. (2021). COCONUT online: COlleCtion of Open Natural prodUcTs database. Journal of Cheminformatics, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00478-9
  72. Günther, S., Kuhn, M., Dunkel, M., Campillos, M., Senger, C., Petsalaki, E., Ahmed, J., Garcia, E. G., Saunders, R., Hoefler, M., Pastre, J., Pielcke, A., Caetano-Anolles, D., Mateo, N. R., Dietz, K., Wolf, A., Frey, E., Wiegand, I., Loeffler, M., … Preissner, R. (2022). SuperNatural 3.0 – a database of natural products and natural product-based derivatives. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D702–D709. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab939
  73. Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., Shaw, D. E., Francis, P., & Shenkin, P. S. (2004). Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47(7), 1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0306430
  74. Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006). Extra precision Glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(21), 6177–6196. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o
  75. McNutt, A. T., Francoeur, P., Aggarwal, R., Masuda, T., Meli, R., Ragoza, M., Sunseri, J., & Koes, D. R. (2021). GNINA 1.0: Molecular docking with deep learning. Journal of Cheminformatics, 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2
  76. Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015). The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 10(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
  77. Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011). Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 51(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100275a
  78. Salentin, S., Schreiber, S., Haupt, V. J., Adasme, M. F., & Schroeder, M. (2015). PLIP: Fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Research, 43(W1), W443–W447. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv315
  79. Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2021). UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Science, 30(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3943
  80. Dixon, S. L., Smondyrev, A. M., Knoll, E. H., Rao, S. N., Shaw, D. E., & Friesner, R. A. (2006). PHASE: A novel approach to pharmacophore modeling and 3D database searching. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 20(10–11), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9087-6
  81. Wieder, M., Garon, A., Perricone, U., Boresch, S., Seidel, T., Almerico, A. M., & Langer, T. (2017). Common hits approach: Combining pharmacophore modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 57(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00674
  82. Yang, J., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Qin, L., Wen, H., & Tang, Y. (2021). Pharmacophore modeling and 3D-QSAR study for the design of novel α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 27(9), 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04881-3
  83. Seidel, T., Ibis, G., Bendix, F., & Wolber, G. (2020). Strategies for 3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 36–37, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.09.003
  84. Bussi, G., & Laio, A. (2020). Using metadynamics to explore complex free-energy landscapes. Nature Reviews Physics, 2(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0153-0
  85. Miao, Y., Feher, V. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2015). Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 11(8), 3584–3595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436
  86. Javed, H., Nagoor Meeran, M. F., Azimullah, S., Adem, A., Sadek, B., & Ojha, S. K. (2019). Plant extracts and phytochemicals targeting alpha-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson's disease models. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01555
  87. Alam, P., Beg, S., Jafar, T., Rahman, M. A., Alqahtani, S. S., Almarfadi, O. M., & Singh, S. (2021). Nano-enabled drug delivery systems for the management of Parkinson's disease: Current advances and future challenges. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 33, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2021.102350
  88. Penthala, N. R., Lamsal, R., Boyd, L. D., & Crooks, P. A. (2022). Berberine analogs as inhibitors of α-synuclein aggregation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 55, 128456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128456
  89. Caruana, M., Högen, T., Levin, J., Hillmer, A., Giese, A., & Vassallo, N. (2011). Inhibition and disaggregation of α-synuclein oligomers by natural polyphenolic compounds. FEBS Letters, 585(8), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.046
  90. Ardah, M. T., Paleologou, K. E., Lv, G., Abul Khair, S. B., Kazim, A. S., Minhas, S. T., Al-Tel, T. H., Al-Hayani, A. A., Haque, M. E., Bhatt, D. L., & El-Agnaf, O. M. A. (2014). Structure activity relationship of phenolic acid inhibitors of α-synuclein fibril formation and toxicity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00197
  91. Meng, X., Munishkina, L. A., Fink, A. L., & Uversky, V. N. (2010). Effects of various flavonoids on the alpha-synuclein fibrillation process. Parkinson's Disease, 2010, 650794. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/650794
  92. Habtemariam, S. (2020). Berberine pharmacology and the gut microbiota: A hidden therapeutic link. Pharmacological Research, 155, 104722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104722
  93. Hussain, G., Wang, J., Rasul, A., Anwar, H., Qu, M., Jiang, T., & Li, T. (2022). Can berberine serve as a new therapy for Parkinson's disease? Neurotoxicity Research, 40(6), 1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-022-00526-2
  94. Akhoon, B. A., Pandey, S., Tiwari, S., Pandey, R. (2016). Withanolide A offers neuroprotection, reduces stress, and improves learning and memory in the Caenorhabditis elegans model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 44, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.04.004
  95. Wongtrakul, J., Thongtan, T., Kumrapich, B., Saisawang, C., & Ketterman, A. J. (2021). Neuroprotective effects of Withania somnifera in the SH-SY5Y Parkinson cell model. Heliyon, 7(10), e08172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08172
  96. Pujols, J., Peña-Díaz, S., Pallares, I., & Ventura, S. (2018). α-Synuclein aggregation monitored by Thioflavin T fluorescence assay. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1779, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_32
  97. Linsenmeier, M., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., & Bhatt, D. L. (2022). Two-step screening method to identify α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors for Parkinson's disease. Scientific Reports, 12, 164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04086-3
  98. Lu, J.-H., Ardah, M. T., Durairajan, S. S. K., Liu, L.-F., Xie, L.-X., Fong, W.-F. D., Hasan, M. Y., Huang, J.-D., El-Agnaf, O. M. A., & Li, M. (2011). Baicalein inhibits formation of alpha-synuclein oligomers within living cells and prevents Abeta peptide fibrillation and oligomerisation. ChemBioChem, 12(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000604
  99. Jiang, M., Porat-Shliom, Y., Pei, Z., Cheng, Y., Xiang, L., Sommers, K., Li, Q., Bhatt, D. L., Huganir, R. L., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, D. L., & Ross, C. A. (2010). Baicalein reduces E46K α-synuclein aggregation in vitro and protects cells against E46K α-synuclein toxicity in cell models of familiar Parkinsonism. Journal of Neurochemistry, 114(2), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06752.x
  100. Zhu, M., Rajamani, S., Kaylor, J., Han, S., Zhou, F., & Fink, A. L. (2004). The flavonoid baicalein inhibits fibrillation of alpha-synuclein and disaggregates existing fibrils. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(26), 26846–26857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403129200
  101. Teng, Y., Zhao, J., Ding, L., Ding, Y., & Zhou, P. (2016). Complex of EGCG with Cu(II) suppresses amyloid aggregation and Cu(II)-induced cytotoxicity of α-synuclein. Molecules, 24(2), 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162940
  102. Bieschke, J., Russ, J., Friedrich, R. P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Wobst, H., Neugebauer, K., & Wanker, E. E. (2010). EGCG remodels mature alpha-synuclein and amyloid-beta fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(17), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910723107
  103. Pandey, N., Strider, J., Nolan, W. C., Yan, S. X., & Galvin, J. E. (2008). Curcumin inhibits aggregation of alpha-synuclein. Acta Neuropathologica, 115(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0332-4
  104. Pirhaghi, M., Mamashli, F., Davaeil, B., Mohammad-Zaheri, M., Mousavi-Jarrahi, Z., Tatzelt, J., & Saboury, A. A. (2025). Hidden faces of alpha-synuclein: Cryo-EM revelation of fibril polymorphs driven by disease, mutations, and PTMs. BBA Advances, 7, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadva.2025.100179
  105. Guerrero-Ferreira, R., Taylor, N. M. I., Arteni, A.-A., Kumari, P., Mona, D., Ringler, P., Britschgi, M., Lauer, M. E., Makky, A., Verasdonck, J., Riek, R., Melki, R., Meier, B. H., Böckmann, A., Bousset, L., & Stahlberg, H. (2019). Two new polymorphic structures of human full-length alpha-synuclein fibrils solved by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife, 8, e48907. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48907
  106. Oikawa, H., & Takada, S. (2024). An integrated machine learning approach delineates an entropic expansion mechanism for the binding of a small molecule to α-synuclein. Nature Communications, 15, 9715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53933-6
  107. Boulaamane, Y., Ibrahim, M. A., Britel, M. R., & Maurady, A. (2023). Probing the molecular mechanisms of α-synuclein inhibitors unveils promising natural candidates through machine-learning QSAR, pharmacophore modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations. Molecular Diversity, 28, 753–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-023-10691-x
  108. Bhatt, R., Ashara, K., Thakkar, M., & Patel, M. (2025). Revamping Parkinson's disease therapy using PLGA-based drug delivery systems. npj Parkinson's Disease. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00959-y

Photo
Ritika Tewatia
Corresponding author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Amit Kumar
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Neha
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Sanjeev Kumar
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Jayson Paul
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Asutosh Updhya
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Yogendra Singh
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Photo
Arun Garg
Co-author

MVN University, Palwal, India, 121105

Ritika Tewatia*, Sanjeev Kumar, Jayson Paul, Asutosh Updhya, Amit Kumar, Neha, Yogendra Singh, Arun Garg, Docking-Based Screening of Natural Compounds as Inhibitors of ?-Synuclein Aggregation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 3826-3853. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20225530

More related articles
A Review on Techniques to Enhance Solubility of Po...
Vaishnavi Ramavat, K. Biyani, R. Pagore, Mangesh Gadekar...
Development and Evaluation of Essential Oil-Enrich...
Hritik, Naresh Kumar, Dr. Puneet Kaushal ...
Related Articles
Review On Tobacco Consumption in Pregnant Women...
Mansimran Kaur, Simran Kaur, Amar Pal Singh, Ajeet Pal Singh, Rajesh Kumar...
Review On Postpartum Anxiety and Depression...
Prerna, Gaurav Hastir, Amar Pal Singh, Ajeet Pal Singh, Rajesh Kumar...
RP-HPLC Method Development of Enzalutamide in Tablet Dosage Form and Its Validat...
Trupti Lade , Sayali Chavan, Pallavi Thombare, Sarika Kumbhar...
A Review on Techniques to Enhance Solubility of Poorly Aqueous Soluble Drug...
Vaishnavi Ramavat, K. Biyani, R. Pagore, Mangesh Gadekar...