Green Analytical Chemistry: Principles, Sustainable Extraction Techniques, Green Solvents, Assessment Tools, and Applications

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) is a specialism with the aim of integrating principles of sustainability in analytical processes. It seeks to minimise the environmental and health effects of measurement

techniques such as reagent consumption, solvents, energy use and waste generation. [1]

The community has adopted the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry to guide the development of and evaluation of sustainable analytical techniques. The principles are specific adaptations of the general principles of green chemistry to the analytical measurement domain. [2]

The guidelines are aimed at preventing waste, reducing the use of reagents, using safer solvents,

improving energy use, miniaturization, automating processes and performing on-line measurements. [3]

The AGREE system has been applied to various applications including pharmaceutical analysis, environmental monitoring, and food chemistry. This application allows to compare methods

systematically with regard to their sustainability. [4].One of the most advanced and complete metrics for the environmental sustainability of analytical methods is the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric.

+[6,5]

The basic concepts of Green Chemistry were introduced by Anastas and Warner in 1999. .[7]

A set of ideal green analytical methods based on green chemistry principles should include the following characteristics: 1) direct, automated, miniaturized and multi analytes techniques; 2) use of minimal sample size, a reduced number of processed samples and simplified pre-treatment procedures; 3)

reduction of the use of chemicals; 4) reduction of waste generation; 5) reduction of hazards and risks; 6) improvements of work safety; 7) improvements of environmental sustainability.

Green chemistry is a concept by Paul Anastas that emphasizes the reduction of harmful effects of chemicals, processes, and substrates. [9].

The vision of green chemistry comes from the principles of sustainable development. At first, chemists focused on industrial-scale processes and products for sustainability. This emphasis is reflected in the

popular definition of green chemistry proposed by Anastas. [10]Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) is the development and application of analytical methods that minimize and/or prevent the generation and use of hazardous materials.

In the era of scientific practices that can cause pollution or depletion of resources, GAC has become an essential part to ensure that the practices do not cause pollution or depletion. Traditional analytical methods often require the use of harmful chemicals and generate significant amounts of waste, which can be harmful to the environment and human health (as mentioned by Chen et al., 2014).This shift not only has environmental advantages but also enhances the safety and efficiency of analytical operations,

making it a valuable part of contemporary scientific endeavors.

This shift is not only eco-friendly but also enhances analytical procedures' safety and efficiency, making it an inevitable part of scientific progress. In 1995, the first steps towards implementing green analytical

chemistry (GAC) in the analytical chemistry field were taken.[11]

The focus on safer solvents and auxiliaries has stimulated the research into alternative extraction and separation methods, such as supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) that significantly cut solvent usage and waste generation. .[12]

2.         BODY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5. Case Studies and Examples

A.        Successful Implementation in Various Fields

The practical value of Green Analytical Chemistry can be demonstrated through its application in environmental, pharmaceutical, and food analysis. These examples show that greener analytical

procedures can reduce resource consumption without necessarily compromising analytical performance.

1.         Environmental Monitoring

Solid-phase microextraction has been applied to the monitoring of volatile organic compounds in environmental samples. Compared with conventional extraction procedures, SPME requires a substantially lesser amount of solvent and produces less waste.

This makes SPME a useful alternative for environmental analysis, particularly where a sensitive detection of trace contaminants is required while minimizing the environmental burden of sample preparation.[70]

2.         Pharmaceutical Analysis

Supercritical fluid chromatography has become an important green alternative for pharmaceutical analysis. When supercritical carbon dioxide is used as the principal mobile phase, the amount of conventional organic solvent required can be reduced.

The approach can also provide rapid separations and effective resolution of pharmaceutical compounds. Therefore, SFC can combine analytical efficiency with reduced solvent consumption.[71]

3.         Food Safety and Quality Control

Direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry has been investigated for the rapid detection of pesticide residues in food samples. One of its major advantages is the reduction of extensive sample preparation.

By limiting the requirement for large quantities of solvents and additional preparation chemicals, DART-based analysis can provide a faster and more environmentally responsible approach to food testing.[67]

B.        Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Green Methods

Comparison between conventional and green analytical procedures demonstrates several important environmental advantages associated with GAC.

1.         Traditional versus Green Solvent Extraction

Traditional solvent extraction frequently relies on relatively large quantities of organic solvents, some of which can be toxic and environmentally harmful. This creates both waste-management requirements and potential health risks.

Green extraction approaches seek to replace such solvents with safer alternatives, including ionic liquids and supercritical fluids. These systems can reduce the environmental footprint of extraction while

maintaining useful extraction efficiency.[72]

2.         Chromatographic Techniques

Conventional HPLC methods can require substantial quantities of organic mobile phases, resulting in

significant solvent waste. Green chromatographic approaches such as SFC can use supercritical CO? as an alternative mobile phase.

SFC can reduce solvent consumption while also offering rapid analysis and efficient separation.

Consequently, it provides an example of how chromatographic methods can be redesigned to reduce the environmental impact.[71]

3.         Spectroscopic Methods

Traditional analytical procedures may involve several sample preparation steps and the use of chemical reagents before spectroscopic measurement. Green spectroscopic approaches attempt to simplify this workflow.

The use of water-based systems, direct measurements, and miniaturized preparation procedures can decrease reagent consumption and waste while maintaining suitable analytical performance. Such

methods demonstrate that environmental improvements can be achieved without necessarily sacrificing analytical quality.[65]

C.        Challenges and Limitations Encountered

Although Green Analytical Chemistry provides considerable environmental and safety benefits, several barriers remain to its broader implementation.

1.         Technological Limitations

Some green analytical technologies require specialized instruments, advanced infrastructure, and trained personnel. Supercritical fluid chromatography, for example, may not be readily accessible to laboratories that lack the necessary equipment or technical expertise.

The high initial cost associated with certain technologies can therefore restrict their adoption, particularly in laboratories with limited financial resources.[73]

2.         Method Development and Validation

The development of a green analytical method is not necessarily straightforward. A new procedure must demonstrate acceptable sensitivity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility while also

reducing its environmental impact.

Methods must often undergo extensive validation before they can replace established procedures. Meeting regulatory requirements while maintaining the advantages of a greener method can therefore require considerable time and resources.[68]

3.         Resistance to Change

Established analytical methods are often preferred because laboratory personnel are familiar with their operation and performance. Even when a greener alternative is available, researchers may hesitate to adopt a new procedure if its reliability has not been demonstrated sufficiently.

Education, training, and clear evidence of the practical advantages of green methods are therefore important for encouraging wider acceptance.[69]

4.         Availability of Green Solvents and Reagents

The availability and cost of environmentally preferable solvents and reagents can also restrict the adoption of GAC. Some green alternatives may not yet be readily accessible or economically competitive for every analytical application.

Continued research is required to expand the range of suitable green chemicals and improve their

availability. As these materials become more widely produced and evaluated, their practical application is likely to increase.[72]

CONCLUSION

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has become an important approach for reducing the environmental and health impacts associated with conventional analytical practices. This review was undertaken to provide an overview of the principles, techniques, greener solvents, assessment approaches, and

applications that contribute to the development of more sustainable analytical methods. The reviewed literature demonstrates that significant improvements in analytical sustainability can be achieved through reduction of solvent and reagent consumption, minimization of waste, safer chemical selection, sample miniaturization, automation, and the use of direct and efficient analytical techniques.

Green extraction approaches such as microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction,

supercritical fluid extraction, QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, stir-bar sorptive extraction, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, and pressurized fluid extraction provide promising alternatives to conventional sample-preparation procedures. Similarly, the use of safer and bio-based solvents, together with greener chromatographic and spectroscopic approaches, can further reduce the environmental burden of analytical laboratories. Assessment tools such as AGREE provide a systematic way to evaluate and compare the greenness of analytical methods. The applications discussed in pharmaceutical, environmental, food, industrial, and clinical analysis indicate that sustainability can be incorporated without necessarily compromising useful analytical performance.

Despite these developments, challenges remain regarding method validation, reproducibility, regulatory acceptance, cost, availability of suitable green solvents and equipment, and the balance between analytical performance and environmental impact. Future research should therefore focus on developing practical, validated, cost-effective, and scalable green methods, expanding the use of renewable and safer solvents, improving miniaturized and automated techniques, and integrating sustainability assessment into routine analytical method development. Greater collaboration between researchers, industries, and regulatory bodies will also be important for the wider adoption of GAC.

Overall, continued development of GAC can support safer laboratory practices and contribute to more sustainable analytical science.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author sincerely expresses her deepest gratitude to Dr. Bhavini Gharia [Assistant Professor-HOD Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry ] Bhagwan Mahavir College of Pharmacy, for her invaluable guidance, encouragement, insightful suggestions, and continuous support throughout the preparation of this review article.

The author is also immensely thankful to Bhagwan Mahavir College of Pharmacy for providing the necessary academic support, digital repositories, and infrastructural facilities that contributed significantly to the completion of this work.

— Sevak Mansi Rakeshkumar

Bhagwan Mahavir College of Pharmacy

REFERENCES

1. Koel M. (2016). Do we need Green Analytical Chemistry? Green Chemistry, 18, 923–931. DOI: 10.1039/C5GC02156A. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02156A
2. Brankovi? M. (2023). Green chemical analysis: main principles and current efforts towards greener analytical methodologies. Analytical Methods, 15, 6631–6642. DOI:

10.1039/D3AY01644G. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AY01644G

3. P?otka-Wasylka J. (2018). A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index. Talanta, 181, 204–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013
4. Tobiszewski M. (2016). Metrics for green analytical chemistry. Analytical Methods, 8, 2993–2999. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY00478D. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY00478D
5. Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M. (2020). AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and Software. Analytical Chemistry, 92(14), 10076–10082. DOI:

10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887

6. Tobiszewski M. (2016). Metrics for green analytical chemistry. Analytical Methods, 8, 2993–2999. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY00478D. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY00478D
7. Filippou O, Bitas D, Samanidou V. (2017). Green approaches in sample preparation of

bioanalytical samples prior to chromatographic analysis. Journal of Chromatography B, 1043, 44–

62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.08.040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.08.040

8. Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M, Pena-Pereira F, Psillakis E. (2022). AGREEprep—analytical greenness metric for sample preparation. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 149, 116553.
9. Tobiszewski M. (2016). Metrics for green analytical chemistry. Analytical Methods, 8, 2993–2999. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY00478D. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY00478D
10. Tobiszewski M. (2016). Metrics for green analytical chemistry. Analytical Methods, 8, 2993–2999. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY00478D. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY00478D
11. Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M. (2020). AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and Software. Analytical Chemistry, 92(14), 10076–10082. DOI:

10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887

12. Rogers L, Jensen KF. (2019). Continuous manufacturing—the Green Chemistry promise? Green Chemistry, 21, 3481–3498.
13. Pena-Pereira F. (2021). Application of AGREE in pharmaceutical analysis: Challenges and perspectives. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1178, 338679.
14. Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W. (2021). Weighting flexibility and limitations in AGREE scoring. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 413, 3859–3869.
15. Ga?uszka A, Migaszewski Z, Konieczka P. (2020). Greenness assessment in environmental analytical chemistry. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8, 104256.
16. Tobiszewski M, Pena-Pereira F. (2021). Greenness metrics in food and bioanalysis. Food Chemistry, 348, 129100.
17. Pena-Pereira F, Tobiszewski M. (2021). Application of AGREE in bioanalytical research: Case studies. Microchemical Journal, 168, 106504.]
18. Tobiszewski M. (2020). Limitations of greenness metrics: Subjectivity and reproducibility. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 21, 7–21.
19. Armenta S, de la Guardia M. (2022). Opportunities and challenges in applying GAC metrics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 414, 3029–3040.
20. Tobiszewski M, Pena-Pereira F. (2022). Integration of AGREE with method validation and regulatory frameworks. Talanta, 242, 123328.]
21. Ga?uszka A, Migaszewski Z. (2021). Practical challenges in balancing greenness and performance in analytical methods. Microchemical Journal, 168, 106504.
22. Pena-Pereira F, Tobiszewski M. (2021). The AGREE metric as a universal tool in green analytical chemistry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 29, 100451.
23. Câmara JS, et al. (2022). Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation

Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules, 27(9), 2953. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092953. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092953

24. Chemat F, Rombaut N, Sicaire AG, Meullemiestre A, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Abert-Vian M. (2017). Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products: Mechanisms, techniques,

combinations, protocols and applications. A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 34, 540–560. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035

25. Armenta S, Garrigues S, de la Guardia M. (2015). The role of green extraction techniques in Green Analytical Chemistry. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 71, 2–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2014.12.011

26. Câmara JS, et al. (2022). Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation

Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules, 27(9), 2953. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092953. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092953

27. Meskar M, Sartaj M, Sedano JA. (2018). Optimization of operational parameters of supercritical

fluid extraction for PHCs removal from a contaminated sand using response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2), 3083–3094. DOI:

10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.048

28. Perestrelo R, Silva P, Porto-Figueira P, Pereira JAM, Silva C, Medina S, Câmara JS. (2019). QuEChERS—Fundamentals, relevant improvements, applications and future trends. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1070, 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.036.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.036

29. Plassmann MM, Schmidt M, Brack W, Krauss M. (2015). Detecting a wide range of

environmental contaminants in human blood samples—combining QuEChERS with LC-MS and GC-MS methods. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407, 7047–7054. DOI:

10.1007/s00216-015-8857-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8857-1

30. Fernandes PA, Le Bourvellec C, Renard CMGC, Nunes FM, Bastos R, Coelho E, Wessel DF,

Coimbra MA, Cardoso SM. (2019). Revisiting the chemistry of apple pomace polyphenols. Food Chemistry, 294, 9–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.006.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.006

31. Perestrelo R, Silva P, Porto-Figueira P, Pereira JAM, Silva C, Medina S, Câmara JS. (2019). QuEChERS—Fundamentals, relevant improvements, applications and future trends. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1070, 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.036.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.036

32. Plassmann MM, Schmidt M, Brack W, Krauss M. (2015). Detecting a wide range of

environmental contaminants in human blood samples—combining QuEChERS with LC-MS and GC-MS methods. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407, 7047–7054. DOI:

10.1007/s00216-015-8857-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8857-1

33. Dybowski MP, Dawidowicz AL. (2018). Application of the QuEChERS procedure for analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its metabolites in authentic whole blood samples by GC–MS/MS. Forensic Toxicology, 36, 415–423. DOI: 10.1007/s11419-018-0419-8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-018-0419-8

34. Billiard KM, Dershem AR, Gionfriddo E. (2020). Implementing Green Analytical Methodologies Using Solid-Phase Microextraction: A Review. Molecules, 25(22), 5297. DOI:

10.3390/molecules25225297. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225297

35. Dulaurent S, El BS, Poncelet L, Gaulier JM, Marquet P, Saint MF. (2016). QuEChERS sample

preparation prior to LC-MS/MS determination of opiates, amphetamines, and cocaine metabolites in whole blood. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 408, 1467–1474. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9248-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9248-3

36. Billiard KM, Dershem AR, Gionfriddo E. (2020). Implementing Green Analytical Methodologies Using Solid-Phase Microextraction: A Review. Molecules, 25(22), 5297. DOI:

10.3390/molecules25225297. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225297

37. Broekaert JAC. (2015). Daniel C. Harris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 9th ed. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407, 8943–8944. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9059-6.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9059-6

38. Billiard KM, Dershem AR, Gionfriddo E. (2020). Implementing Green Analytical Methodologies Using Solid-Phase Microextraction: A Review. Molecules, 25(22), 5297. DOI:

10.3390/molecules25225297. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225297

39. Ochiai N, Sasamoto K, Kanda H, Pfannkoch E. (2018). Recent Developments of Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction for Food Applications: Extension to Polar Solutes. Journal of Agricultural and Food

Chemistry, 66(28), 7249–7255. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02182. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02182

40. Andrascikova M, Matisova E, Hrouzkova S. (2015). Liquid phase microextraction techniques as a sample preparation step for analysis of pesticide residues in food. Separation and Purification

Reviews, 44(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/15422119.2013.872125.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2013.872125

41. Raut P, Bhosle D, Janghel A, Deo S, Verma C, Kumar SS, Agrawal M, Amit N, Sharma M, Giri T. (2015). Emerging pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) techniques as an innovative green

technology for the effective extraction of active phytopharmaceuticals. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 8(6), 800–810. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00129.8.

https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00129.8

42. Armenta S, de la Guardia M. (2016). Green chromatography for the analysis of foods of animal origin. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 80, 517–530. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.06.012.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.06.012

43. Yabré M, Ferey L, Somé IT, Gaudin K. (2018). Greening Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Methods Using Alternative Solvents for Pharmaceutical Analysis. Molecules, 23(5), 1065. DOI:

10.3390/molecules23051065. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051065

44. Shen Y, Chen B, van Beek TA. (2015). Alternative solvents can make preparative liquid chromatography greener. Green Chemistry, 17, 4073–4081.
45. Yabré M, Ferey L, Somé IT, Gaudin K. (2018). Greening Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Methods Using Alternative Solvents for Pharmaceutical Analysis. Molecules, 23(5), 1065. DOI:

10.3390/molecules23051065. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051065

46. Shaaban H, Górecki T. (2015). Current trends in green liquid chromatography for the analysis of pharmaceutically active compounds in the environmental water compartments. Talanta, 132, 739–752.]
47. Funari CS, Carneiro RL, Khandagale MM, Cavalheiro AJ, Hilder EF. (2015). Acetone as a greener alternative to acetonitrile in liquid chromatographic fingerprinting. Journal of Separation Science, 38(9), 1458–1465.]
48. Yabré M, Ferey L, Somé IT, Gaudin K. (2018). Greening Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Methods Using Alternative Solvents for Pharmaceutical Analysis. Molecules, 23(5), 1065. DOI:

10.3390/molecules23051065. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051065

49. Ordonez EY, Rodil R, Quintana JB, Cela R. (2015). Determination of artificial sweeteners in

beverages with green mobile phases and high temperature liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 169, 162–168.

50. Prache N, Abreu S, Sassiat P, Thiébaut D, Chaminade P. (2016). Alternative solvents for improving the greenness of normal phase liquid chromatography of lipid classes. Journal of Chromatography A, 1464, 55–63.
51. Grau J, Azorín C, Benedé JL, Chisvert A, Salvador A. (2022). Use of green alternative solvents in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: A review. Journal of Separation Science, 45(1), 210–222. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202100609
52. Bigus P, Namiesnik J, Tobiszewski M. (2016). Application of multi criteria decision analysis in solvent type optimization for chlorophenols determination with a dispersive liquid–liquid

microextraction. Journal of Chromatography A, 1446, 21–26.

53. Li Z, Smith KH, Stevens GW. (2016). The use of environmentally sustainable bio-derived

solvents in solvent extraction applications—a review. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24, 215–220.

54. Pena-Pereira F, Kloskowski A, Namiesnik J. (2015). Perspectives on the replacement of harmful organic solvents in analytical methodologies: a framework toward the implementation of a

generation of eco-friendly alternatives. Green Chemistry, 17, 3687–3705.

55. Ahmadkalaei SPJ, Gan S, Ng HK, Talib SA. (2016). Investigation of ethyl lactate as a green solvent for desorption of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 22008–22018.
56. Pacheco-Fernández I, Pino V. (2019). Green solvents in analytical chemistry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 18, 42–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.12.010.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.12.010

57. Sharma K, Mahato N, Cho MH, Lee YR. (2017). Converting citrus wastes into value-added products: economic and environmentally friendly approaches. Nutrition, 34, 29–46.
58. Cámara JS, et al. (2022). Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation

Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules, 27(9), 2953. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092953. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092953

59. Cámara JS, et al. (2022). Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation

Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules, 27(9), 2953. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092953. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092953

60. Cámara JS, et al. (2022). Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation

Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules, 27(9), 2953. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092953. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092953

61. Tobiszewski M, Namiesnik J, Pena-Pereira F. (2017). Environmental risk-based ranking of solvents by the combination of multimedia model and multi-criteria decision analysis. Green Chemistry, 19, 1034–1043.
62. Leng Kua Y, Gan S, Morris A, Kiat Ng H. (2016). Ethyl lactate as a potential green solvent to

extract hydrophilic (polar) and lipophilic (non-polar) phytonutrients simultaneously from fruit and vegetable by-products. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 4, 21–31.

63. Li Z, Smith KH, Stevens GW. (2016). The use of environmentally sustainable bio-derived

solvents in solvent extraction applications—a review. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24, 215–220.]

64. Pacheco-Fernández I, Pino V. (2019). Green solvents in analytical chemistry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 18, 42–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.12.010.

ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.12.010

65. Armenta S, Garrigues S, de la Guardia M. (2015). Green Analytical Methods: Strategies and Trends. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407(9), 2317–2331.
66. Trujillo-Rodriguez MJ, Nan H, Varona M, Emaus MN, Souza ID, Anderson JL. (2019). Advances of ionic liquids in analytical chemistry. Analytical Chemistry, 91(1), 505–531. DOI:

10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04710

67. Esteki M, Shahsavari Z, Simal-Gandara J. (2018). Use of spectroscopic methods in food analysis and their contribution to green analytical chemistry. Current Opinion in Food Science, 22, 115–

121. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.01.009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2018.01.009

68. Koel M. (2016). Do we need Green Analytical Chemistry? Green Chemistry, 18, 923–931. DOI: 10.1039/C5GC02156A. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02156A
69. Brankovi? M. (2023). Green chemical analysis: main principles and current efforts towards greener analytical methodologies. Analytical Methods, 15, 6631–6642. DOI:

10.1039/D3AY01644G. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AY01644G

70. Billiard KM, Dershem AR, Gionfriddo E. (2020). Implementing Green Analytical Methodologies Using Solid-Phase Microextraction: A Review. Molecules, 25(22), 5297. DOI:

10.3390/molecules25225297. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225297

71. Desfontaine V, Guillarme D, Francotte E, Nováková L. (2015). Supercritical fluid chromatography in pharmaceutical analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 113, 56–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.03.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.03.007
72. Trujillo-Rodriguez MJ, Nan H, Varona M, Emaus MN, Souza ID, Anderson JL. (2019). Advances of ionic liquids in analytical chemistry. Analytical Chemistry, 91(1), 505–531. DOI:

10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04710

73. Lemasson E, et al. (2016). Use and practice of achiral and chiral supercritical fluid

chromatography in pharmaceutical analysis and purification. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201501062