View Article

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a herbal nanoemulgel containing curcumin and berberine hydrochloride for the topical management of psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune skin disorder characterized by inflammation and excessive keratinocyte proliferation. A nanoemulsion was prepared using oleic acid as the oil phase, Tween 80 as the surfactant, and PEG 400 as the co-surfactant, and was incorporated into a gel base to obtain the nanoemulgel. A 3² factorial design was used to optimize the surfactant and co-surfactant concentrations. The formulations were evaluated for particle size, zeta potential, FTIR compatibility, and physicochemical properties. The optimized formulation (R4) exhibited a particle size of 85.2 nm and a zeta potential of ?39.4 mV, indicating excellent stability. It also showed a suitable pH (5.7), good spreadability, and pseudoplastic rheological behavior, making it appropriate for topical application. Molecular docking studies demonstrated strong binding affinities of curcumin and berberine toward psoriasis-related targets, supporting their therapeutic potential. Overall, the developed herbal nanoemulgel demonstrated enhanced stability, favorable topical characteristics, and improved potential for skin delivery, suggesting its promise as an effective topical drug delivery system for psoriasis treatment.

Keywords

Psoriasis; Herbal nanoemulgel; Curcumin; Berberine hydrochloride; Nanoemulsion; Topical drug delivery; Molecular docking; 32 Factorial design

Introduction

× Popup Image

Introduction to Psoriasis [1]

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder characterized by excessive keratinocyte proliferation, erythematous scaly plaques, and persistent inflammation. The condition is frequently associated with metabolic syndrome, including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes-related complications, and obesity, which collectively increase the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular mortality in affected patients. Psoriasis may also be exacerbated by factors such as infections, skin injury, irritation caused by cuts, burns, rashes, or insect bites, and the presence of other autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis. Clinically, psoriasis presents with diverse manifestations, commonly appearing as localized or widespread scaly erythematous plaques. Based on clinical characteristics, the disease is classified into vulgaris, arthropathic, pustular, and erythrodermic types. Psoriatic lesions are distinguished from other dermatological conditions by the presence of red plaques covered with silvery-white multilayered scales and a markedly thickened acanthotic epidermis. Patients frequently experience symptoms such as itching, pain, and bleeding.

Symptoms of Psoriasis

  1. Common symptoms of psoriasis include:
  2. Red patches of skin covered with thick, silvery scales
  3. Small scaling spots
  4. Dry and cracked skin that may bleed or itch Itching, burning sensation, or soreness
  5. Thickened, pitted, or ridged nails
  6. Swollen and stiff joints

Pathophysiology of Psoriasis

The pathophysiology of psoriasis involves complex immune dysregulation mediated primarily by T lymphocytes, particularly T-helper 17 (Th17) and T-helper 1 (Th1) cells. These immune cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-17 (IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), which stimulate keratinocytes to produce chemokines and adhesion molecules. This process promotes the recruitment of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils and dendritic cells, into the skin, leading to chronic inflammation and plaque formation. Psoriatic plaques are characterized by thickened, erythematous, and scaly skin lesions. In addition to immune dysfunction, impairment of the skin barrier contributes significantly to disease progression by facilitating antigen penetration and enhancing inflammatory responses. Furthermore, dysregulation of epidermal differentiation and proliferation pathways results in abnormal keratinocyte differentiation and hyperkeratosis, which further contribute to plaque development. The disease is primarily associated with T-cell-mediated immune responses that induce excessive keratinocyte proliferation and inflammation.[2] Cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23 play a critical role in the initiation and progression of psoriasis.[3]

Fig 1.1: Pathophysiology of psoriasis

There has been a global transition from synthetic medications toward herbal and natural therapies, reflecting renewed interest in traditional medicinal systems. Herbal drugs contain bioactive phytochemical constituents that often exhibit synergistic effects, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy and overall treatment outcomes. The effectiveness of herbal therapies depends on the development of standardized formulations with consistent quality and well-defined constituents. Pharmacologically active phytochemicals present in herbal products play a significant role in disease management. Herbal medicines have gained considerable attention due to their ability to treat various disorders with minimal adverse effects. Since ancient times, herbal remedies have been extensively utilized worldwide for their therapeutic potential and comparatively lower toxicity than conventional synthetic drugs. However, limited scientific validation and formulation challenges restricted the development of advanced herbal formulations for an extended period.[4]

Nanoemulsion in Topical Application

Nanoemulsions are colloidal dispersions with droplet sizes generally ranging from 20–200 nm and are widely employed in drug delivery applications.[5] Due to their nanoscale droplet size and large surface area, nanoemulsions enhance drug permeation through the skin and improve topical drug delivery efficiency.[6] Nanoemulsions represent a promising approach for improving the delivery and targeting of poorly water-soluble drugs by increasing drug absorption, prolonging retention at the target site, and reducing systemic side effects. The advantages of nanoemulsions are primarily attributed to their nanosized globules, which significantly improve the bioavailability of therapeutic agents. Studies have demonstrated that the transdermal bioavailability of lacidipine was approximately 3.5-fold higher than that achieved through oral administration, mainly due to the avoidance of first-pass metabolism. Furthermore, nanoemulsions enhance skin permeation, thereby attracting significant interest in topical and transdermal drug delivery research. The reduced particle size allows greater drug incorporation into the formulation, resulting in an increased thermodynamic activity gradient toward the skin. Additionally, improved drug partitioning into the skin enhances permeation efficiency.[7]

Advantages of Nanoemulsion

  1. Can be used as an alternative to liposomes and vesicular systems
  2. Enhances the bioavailability of drugs
  3. Exhibits non-toxic and non-irritant properties
  4. Provides improved physical stability
  5. Facilitates improved uptake of oil-soluble compounds in cell culture technology
  6. Enhances the solubilization of lipophilic drugs
  7. Requires comparatively lower energy for formulation preparation.[8]

Nanoemulgel

Nanoemulgels are advanced topical drug delivery systems extensively investigated for the treatment of various dermatological disorders, including skin infections. These systems are suitable for delivering hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs. A nanoemulgel consists of a nanoemulsion incorporated into a gel matrix, which acts as a drug reservoir, facilitating controlled drug release, enhanced absorption, and improved skin penetration.[9] Incorporation of nanoemulsion into a gel base improves the rheological properties, spreadability, and stability of the formulation while reducing surface tension. Upon application to the skin, the gel releases oil droplets containing the drug, which penetrate the stratum corneum and deliver the therapeutic agent to the target site. Nanoemulgels exhibit excellent adhesion properties, and the high solubilization capacity of the oil phase creates a greater concentration gradient across the skin, thereby enhancing drug permeation. In addition, nanoemulgels improve patient compliance because of their superior spreadability and lower greasiness compared to conventional creams and ointments.[10]

Advantages of Nanoemulgel

  1. Suitable for the delivery of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-infective agents.
  2. Nanogels are nanoparticle-based hydrogels widely explored for drug delivery, tissue engineering, and other biomedical applications Possess excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and high drug-loading capacity.[11]

2. AIM AND OBJECTIVE

Aim

To develop and evaluate a nanoemulgel formulation containing curcumin and berberine hydrochloride for effective topical treatment of Psoriasis, with improved drug penetration, stability, and therapeutic efficacy.

Objectives

  • To formulate a stable nanoemulsion incorporating curcumin and berberine hydrochloride using suitable oils, surfactants, and co-surfactants.
  • To convert the prepared nanoemulsion into a nanoemulgel using an appropriate gelling agent for topical application.
  • To evaluate the formulation for key parameters.
  • To enhance the skin permeability and bioavailability of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride through nanoemulgel delivery.
  • To evaluate the potential of the formulation in reducing symptoms associated with psoriasis such as inflammation, scaling, and redness.
  1. MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY

The binding affinities of curcumin and berberine were investigated using in silico molecular modeling and docking approaches. All docking simulations were performed using Biovia Discovery Studio, PyRx software, and ChemDraw. Molecular docking studies were conducted using [software, e.g., AutoDock Vina or Schrödinger Glide] to evaluate the binding interactions and affinities of curcumin and berberine against protein targets with PDB IDs 5ZTN (human DYRK2 kinase, resolution 2.2 Å) and 1GFK (fungal enzyme target). Protein structures were prepared by removing water molecules, adding hydrogen atoms, and performing energy minimization, while ligand structures were geometrically optimized prior to docking. Grid boxes were defined around the active sites, specifically the ATP-binding pocket for 5ZTN and the catalytic domain for 1GFK. Docking parameters, including binding energies (ΔG, kcal/mol), binding conformations, and molecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, were analyzed and validated by comparison with known inhibitors.[12]

    1. Docking Results

Table n 3.1: Molecular docking studies of curcumin and berberine HCl

Molecular docking studies confirmed the potential of curcumin and berberine HCl as anti-psoriatic agents through their interactions with key inflammatory proteins. Curcumin showed strong binding affinity toward PDB ID 5ZTN (−8.1 to −7.9 kcal/mol), while berberine exhibited significant affinity for PDB ID 1GFK (−7.9 to −7.8 kcal/mol), suggesting possible inhibition of NF-κB and JAK-STAT signaling pathways involved in psoriasis. Curcumin may suppress pro-inflammatory signaling associated with keratinocyte hyperproliferation, whereas berberine may inhibit cytokine-mediated responses involving IL-17, IL-23, and Th17 pathways. The observed binding energies (ΔG < −7.8 kcal/mol) indicate stable ligand–protein interactions mediated by hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions.

         

Fig 3.1 :- Docking interactions of Curcumin (A) 2D interactions; and (B) 3D interactions

          

Fig 3.2 :- Docking interactions of Berberine (A) 2D interactions; and (B) 3D interactions

a. Drug Profile

i. Turmeric

Fig 3.3: Turmeric

1. Common Name: Turmeric

2. Botanical Name: Curcuma longa

3. Family: Zingiberaceae

4. Active constituents: Curcuminoids, curcumin, turmerones, volatile oils

ii. Mahonia aquifolium

Fig 3.4: Berberine

1. Common Name: Mahonia aquifolium

2. Botanical Name: Oregon grape

3. Family: Berberidaceae

4. Active constituents : Berberine

4. PREFORMULATION STUDIES

1. Organoleptic Properties

The organoleptic characteristics, including colour and physical appearance of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride, were evaluated visually according to the standards specified in the British Pharmacopoeia.

2. Melting Point Determination

The melting points of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride were determined using the capillary tube method. A small quantity of the finely powdered sample was filled into a sealed capillary tube, attached to a thermometer, and placed in a melting point apparatus. The temperature was gradually increased, and the temperature range at which the sample began to melt and completely liquefied was recorded as the melting point.

3. Solubility Study

The solubility of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride was evaluated in Tween 80, PEG 400, oleic acid, and water. A small quantity of each drug was added separately to the respective solvents in test tubes, followed by thorough shaking and mild heating when necessary. Solubility was assessed visually based on the extent of dissolution.

4. Determination of Calibration Curve of Berberine Hydrochloride and Curcumin

Standard stock solutions of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride were prepared by accurately weighing and dissolving known quantities of each drug in suitable solvents to obtain specific concentrations. Serial dilutions were then prepared within the desired analytical range. The calibration curves were constructed by measuring the absorbance of the prepared solutions.

5. Compatibility Study

Compatibility studies of curcumin and berberine hydrochloride were carried out using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The infrared spectra of the pure drugs and their physical mixtures with formulation excipients were recorded separately. The physical mixtures contained all formulation ingredients, and FTIR analysis was performed individually for each drug as well as for the combined drug formulation to evaluate possible interactions.

5. FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT

Selection of Excipients

Tween 80 was selected as the primary surfactant due to its non-ionic nature, high solubilization capacity, and suitability for stabilizing oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsions, attributed to its hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB ~15). It effectively stabilizes the oil–water interface and contributes to the formation of stable nanoemulsion systems. PEG 400 was used as a co-surfactant to enhance surfactant efficiency, reduce interfacial tension, and expand the nanoemulsion region in phase diagrams, particularly at Smix ratios such as 1:1 and 2:1. Additionally, PEG 400 improves drug solubility and interfacial fluidity. Oleic acid was selected as the oil phase because of its excellent drug solubilization capacity and penetration- enhancing properties associated with its fatty acid structure.[13]

Tween 80 and PEG 400 have been widely employed in pharmaceutical nanoemulsion formulations due to their ability to produce stable droplets and improve formulation stability. Studies have reported that optimized combinations, such as 36% Tween 80 and 18.6% PEG 400, contribute to robust nanoemulsion systems. Oleic acid also provides ultra-low interfacial tension when combined with surfactants and co-surfactants, enabling efficient oil incorporation and enhanced drug delivery performance.[14]

Design of Experiment

Formulation Optimization Using 3² Full Factorial Design

A 3² full factorial design was employed for the optimization of the berberine nanoemulgel formulation. In this experimental design, two independent variables were evaluated at three levels: low (−1), medium (0), and high (+1), resulting in a total of nine experimental formulations (3² = 9). The factorial design facilitates the evaluation of both the individual and interaction effects of formulation variables on the selected responses. The independent variables selected were the concentration of the oil phase (X₁) and the concentration of the surfactant/co-surfactant mixture (X₂), as these factors significantly influence the physicochemical characteristics of the nanoemulsion system. The dependent variables studied included particle size, entrapment efficiency, and drug release. Particle size is a critical parameter affecting formulation stability and skin permeation, while entrapment efficiency reflects the drug-retaining capacity of the formulation. Drug release behavior is directly associated with therapeutic performance. The factorial design approach enabled systematic optimization of the formulation by establishing mathematical relationships between formulation variables and response parameters. Furthermore, it facilitated the identification of an optimized formulation with desirable physicochemical and drug delivery characteristic

Table no 5.1: Formulation Optimization 3 full Factorial Design

Run

Tween 80

PEG 400

Oleic acid

Water

R1

3.2

0.8

2

Qs

R2

2.4

0.8

2

Qs

R3

1.6

1.2

2

Qs

R4

1.6

0.8

2

Qs

R5

2.4

1.6

2

Qs

R6

3.2

1.6

2

Qs

R7

2.4

1.2

2

Qs

R8

3.2

1.2

2

Qs

R9

1.6

1.6

2

Qs

The combined image represents all nine batches of nanoemulsion formulations prepared using above 3² factorial design, illustrating the visual appearance, homogeneity, and comparative characteristics of each batch under identical experimental conditions.

Fig 5.1: Nanoemulsion Batches

Preparation of Nanoemulsion

Pre-Emulsion Preparation

Magnetic stirring was employed as a low-energy technique for the preparation of a stable pre-emulsion by uniformly dispersing the oil phase (oleic acid), surfactant (Tween 80), co-surfactant (PEG 400), and aqueous phase prior to high-shear homogenization. This preliminary mixing step produced a coarse emulsion containing macro-sized droplets (1–10 µm), thereby ensuring phase compatibility and minimizing phase separation during subsequent Ultra Turrax homogenization.[15] Initially, Tween 80 and PEG 400 were dissolved in oleic acid to prepare the organic phase. Subsequently, water was added dropwise at a controlled rate (approximately 2 mL/min) into the mixture under continuous magnetic stirring at 400–1000 rpm for 10–30 min at a controlled temperature range of 25–70°C. This process resulted in the formation of a milky coarse emulsion containing macro-droplets. Continuous stirring using a Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar maintained system equilibrium, prevented creaming and phase separation, and promoted interfacial stabilization, consistent with spontaneous emulsification techniques used for homogeneous nanoemulsion preparation.[16]

 

 
  

Fig 5.2: Magnetic Stirring of Nanoemulsion

High-Pressure Homogenization

High-shear homogenization using an Ultra Turrax was employed as a high-energy technique for the preparation of nanoemulsions. This method applies intense mechanical shear through rotor–stator disruption to reduce oil droplet size into the nanoscale range, typically between 20–200 nm.[17] The Ultra Turrax technique offers advantages such as simplicity, scalability, and effective control over droplet size by adjusting operational parameters including homogenization speed, processing time, and phase addition sequence. Initially, droplet sizes in the range of 100–500 nm can be achieved, which may be further refined with optimized processing conditions. Homogenization was carried out at speeds ranging from 11,000–20,000 rpm for 3–5 min, as higher speeds enhance droplet size reduction, although excessive speed may increase heat generation and viscosity. Owing to its efficiency and GRAS-compliant nature, the Ultra Turrax method is widely utilized for laboratory-scale nanoemulsion development and subsequent scale-up applications.[18]

             

 

      

 

Fig 5.3: High-shear homogenization using an Ultra Turrax

Preparation of  Nanoemulgel

Gel Base Formation

The gel base was prepared by dispersing Carbopol 940 in distilled water (e.g., 2 g in 80 mL) followed by magnetic stirring at 500 rpm for 24 h to ensure complete hydration and swelling, resulting in a clear dispersion. The optimized nanoemulsion was then incorporated slowly into the Carbopol dispersion under continuous stirring at 800–1000 rpm for 30–45 min to achieve uniform distribution without phase separation. The formulation temperature was maintained between 25–30°C during the process.[19]

Neutralization and Homogenization

Triethanolamine was added dropwise to the formulation until the pH reached 6.5–7.0, resulting in gel formation and an increase in viscosity due to neutralization of the Carbopol dispersion.[20]

6. RESULTS

  1. Organoleptic Properties

Table no 6.1: Organoleptic Properties

Property

Curcumin

Berberine

Colour

Bright Yellow

Bright Yellow

Odour

Slightly Characteristics

Very Slightly Characteristics

Taste

Bitter

Strongly bitter

Appearance

Crystalline powder

Crystalline powder

  1. Solubility Stud

Table no 6.2: Solubility Study

Vehicle Type

Vehicle Name

Curcumin Solubility

Berberine Solubility

Oil

Oleic Acid

High

Low

Surfactant

Tween80

High

Moderate

CO-Surfactant

PEG400

High

High

Aqueous

Dis. Water

Very Low

High

  1. Melting Points

Melting point of Curcumin and Berberine was determined and it found to be :

Table no 6.3: Melting Point

Sr.no

Drug

Melting point

1

Curcumin

183o C

2

Berberine

190oC

  1. Determination of Calibration Curve of Berberine Hydrochloride

Table no 6.4: Concentration and absorbance of curcumin and berberine

Concentration

Absorbance

Concentration

Absorbance

5

0.658

5

0.479

10

0.817

10

0.510

15

1.091

15

0.539

20

1.496

20

0.589

25

1.859

25

0.616

 

The calibration curve of berberine hydrochloride exhibited a linear relationship between concentration and absorbance, indicating compliance with Beer–Lambert’s law within the selected concentration range. The linear regression plot showed a strong correlation coefficient (R² close to 1), confirming the accuracy, precision, and reliability of the UV spectrophotometric method. Therefore, the developed calibration curve can be effectively utilized for the quantitative estimation of berberine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations.

  1. Compatibility Study

The successful development of a stable formulation depends on the appropriate selection of excipients that facilitate drug release while protecting the active pharmaceutical ingredient from degradation. Since drug and polymer components remain in close contact within the formulation, potential interactions may lead to instability of the drug. Therefore, preformulation studies evaluating drug–polymer compatibility are essential for the selection of suitable excipients. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was employed to assess the compatibility between curcumin, berberine hydrochloride, and the selected polymers.[20]

Fig 6.1:- FTIR Spectrum of Physical Mixture (Berberine)

The FTIR spectrum of oleic acid exhibited characteristic peaks corresponding to C=O stretching at 1740 cm⁻¹, C=C stretching around 1655 cm⁻¹, and long-chain hydrocarbon vibrations near 722 cm⁻¹. Berberine hydrochloride showed characteristic aromatic peaks in the regions of 1655 cm⁻¹ and 950–800 cm⁻¹, along with C–N stretching vibrations. The FTIR spectrum of the prepared formulation containing berberine hydrochloride, Tween 80, PEG 400, and oleic acid was analyzed to evaluate the presence of functional groups and assess the compatibility among formulation components. The obtained spectrum confirmed the retention of characteristic peaks of all individual components. No significant peak shifts, disappearance, or formation of new peaks were observed, indicating the absence of chemical interactions and demonstrating good compatibility between berberine hydrochloride and the selected excipients.

Fig 6.2 :- FTIR Spectrum of Pure Berberine

The FTIR spectrum of berberine hydrochloride exhibited a broad absorption peak at approximately 3466 cm⁻¹, corresponding to O–H/N–H stretching vibrations. Peaks observed in the range of 3154–3026 cm⁻¹ confirmed aromatic C–H stretching, while bands at 2926–2830 cm⁻¹ were attributed to aliphatic C–H stretching associated with methoxy groups. A prominent peak at 1595 cm⁻¹ indicated aromatic C=C stretching vibrations, whereas the peak at 1491 cm⁻¹ corresponded to aromatic ring vibrations. Peaks observed at 1375 cm⁻¹ were assigned to C–N stretching, and bands in the range of 1215–1030 cm⁻¹ .

Fig 6.3 :- FTIR Spectrum of Physical Mixture (Curcumin)

The FTIR spectrum exhibited a broad absorption peak at 3458 cm⁻¹, corresponding to –OH stretching vibrations contributed by curcumin and PEG 400, indicating the presence of hydrogen bonding interactions. Peaks observed at 2921 cm⁻¹ and 2859 cm⁻¹ were attributed to aliphatic C–H stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of long hydrocarbon chains derived from Tween 80 and oleic acid.

A prominent peak at 1732 cm⁻¹ corresponded to ester carbonyl (C=O) stretching, characteristic of Tween 80 and oleic acid, thereby confirming their incorporation into the formulation. The peak at 1648 cm⁻¹ was assigned to C=C stretching vibrations, indicating retention of the aromatic and conjugated structure of curcumin. Furthermore, peaks within the range of 1349–1244 cm⁻¹ along with the peak at 1095 cm⁻¹ were associated with C–O and C–O–C stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of ether linkages from PEG 400 and the surfactant structure of Tween 80. The fingerprint region below 1000 cm⁻¹ displayed multiple peaks attributed to alkene bending vibrations, primarily associated with oleic acid.

Fig 6.4 :- FTIR Spectrum of Pure Curcumin

The FTIR spectrum exhibited a broad absorption peak around 3400 cm⁻¹, corresponding to phenolic – OH stretching vibrations, which are associated with the antioxidant activity of curcumin. Peaks observed in the range of 2920–2850 cm⁻¹ were attributed to aliphatic C–H stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of hydrocarbon chains. A prominent peak near 1620 cm⁻¹ represented conjugated carbonyl (C=O) stretching, characteristic of the diketone structure of curcumin.

Additionally, the spectral region between 1600–1500 cm⁻¹ indicated aromatic C=C stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of benzene rings. Peaks in the range of 1270–1020 cm⁻¹ were assigned to C–O and ether (C–O–C) stretching vibrations associated with methoxy groups (–OCH₃).

Furthermore, a sharp peak near 960 cm⁻¹ corresponded to trans –CH=CH bending vibrations, confirming the presence of the conjugated double-bond structure of curcumin.

Fig 6.5 :- FTIR Spectrum of Physical mixture of Curcumin and Berberine

The FTIR spectrum of the physical mixture containing curcumin, berberine, Tween 80, PEG 400, and oleic acid exhibited characteristic peaks corresponding to the functional groups of both the drugs and excipients. A broad peak around 3450 cm⁻¹ was attributed to hydroxyl (–OH) stretching vibrations from curcumin and PEG 400, indicating possible hydrogen bonding interactions. Peaks observed at approximately 2920 cm⁻¹ and 2850 cm⁻¹ corresponded to aliphatic C–H stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of long hydrocarbon chains derived from Tween 80 and oleic acid. A prominent absorption peak in the range of 1730–1760 cm⁻¹ represented ester carbonyl (C=O) stretching vibrations characteristic of Tween 80 and oleic acid. The peak near 1645 cm⁻¹ was assigned to aromatic C=C stretching vibrations of curcumin along with C=N or conjugated system vibrations of berberine, confirming the presence of both drugs within the formulation. Furthermore, peaks in the range of 1240–1050 cm⁻¹ were attributed to C–O and C–O–C stretching vibrations associated with PEG 400 and surfactant structures. The fingerprint region below 1000 cm⁻¹ displayed multiple peaks corresponding to aromatic and alkene bending vibrations.

No significant peak shift, disappearance, or formation of new peaks was observed in the spectrum, indicating the absence of chemical interactions between the drugs and excipients. Therefore, the FTIR study confirmed the compatibility of curcumin and berberine with the selected formulation components, supporting their suitability for the development of nanoemulsion and nanoemulgel systems.

Summary of Design of Experiment

Table no 6.5: Summary of Design of Experiment

Run

Tween 80

PEG 400

Oleic acid

Water

Particle Size (nm)

Zeta (mv)

R1

3.2

0.8

2

Qs

106.8

-18.4

R2

2.4

0.8

2

Qs

67.5

-23.4

R3

1.6

1.2

2

Qs

88.9

-39.7

R4

1.6

0.8

2

Qs

85.2

-39.4

R5

2.4

1.6

2

Qs

118.9

-38.2

R6

3.2

1.6

2

Qs

139.5

-35.5

R7

2.4

1.2

2

Qs

93.3

-36.3

R8

3.2

1.2

2

Qs

117.3

-27

R9

1.6

1.6

2

Qs

127.2

-40.4

All formulations exhibited particle sizes within the nanometric range (67.5–139.5 nm), confirming the successful formation of nanoemulsions. Among the formulations, R2 demonstrated the smallest particle size (67.5 nm), indicating an optimal concentration of surfactant and co-surfactant for efficient emulsification. However, a further increase in the concentrations of Tween 80 and PEG 400 resulted in an increase in particle size. The zeta potential values ranged from −18.4 to −40.4 mV, indicating good formulation stability, primarily attributed to the presence of oleic acid. Formulations R3, R4, and R9 exhibited comparatively higher negative zeta potential values, suggesting enhanced physical stability. Overall, formulation R2 was identified as optimal with respect to minimum particle size, whereas formulations R3 and R4 demonstrated a more favorable balance between particle size and stability.

Fit Summary

Response 1: Particle size

Table no 6.6: Response 1: Particle size

Source

Sequential p-value

Lack of Fit p-value

Adjusted R²

Predicted R²

 

Linear

0.0106

 

0.7071

0.4633

Suggested

2FI

0.7439

 

0.6567

-0.2528

 

Quadratic

0.0813

 

0.8927

0.5774

 

Cubic

0.5968

 

0.8853

-1.6131

Aliased

ANOVA for Linear model RESPONSE

1: PARTICLE SIZE

Source

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F-value

p-value

 

Model

3297.08

2

1648.54

10.66

0.0106

significant

A-Tween 80

646.88

1

646.88

4.18

0.0868

 

B-PEG 400

2650.20

1

2650.20

17.13

0.0061

 

Residual

928.12

6

154.69

 

 

 

Cor Total

4225.20

8

 

 

 

 

ANOVA for Linear model

Factor coding Sum of squares is

The Model F-value of 10.66 implies the model is significant. There is only a 1.06% chance that an F-value this large could occur due to noise.

P-values less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant. In this case B is a significant model term. Values greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant. If there are many insignificant model terms (not counting those required to support hierarchy), model reduction may improve your model.

Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors

246.256 + 25.9583 * A + 52.5417 * B

1) Predicted vs Actual Plot :

The predicted versus actual plot for particle size demonstrated good agreement between the experimental and model-predicted values. Most data points were closely distributed along the diagonal line, indicating that the selected model provided an acceptable fit for the experimental data. Minor deviations observed for a few points suggest slight prediction errors under certain experimental conditions. The color gradient, ranging from blue to represented variations in particle size values, where blue indicated lower particle sizes and red indicated higher values. Overall, the close distribution of data points around the reference line confirmed the satisfactory predictive capability and moderate accuracy of the developed model.

Fig 6.6: predicted vs. actual plot for particle size

2) Contour Plot:

The particle size of the formulations varied with changes in the concentrations of Tween 80 and PEG

400. At a PEG 400 concentration of 0.8 mL, particle sizes increased from 72.4 nm to 108.9 nm as the Tween 80 concentration increased from 1.6 mL to 6.4 mL. Similarly, at 1.6 mL PEG 400, particle sizes of 86.2 nm, 101.5 nm, 118.3 nm, and 132.6 nm were observed corresponding to Tween 80 concentrations of 1.6 mL, 3.2 mL, 4.8 mL, and 6.4 mL, respectively.

At a PEG 400 concentration of 2.4 mL, the particle sizes further increased to 99.8 nm, 119.7 nm,

139.5 nm, and 153.2 nm with increasing Tween 80 concentrations. Likewise, at 3.2 mL PEG 400, particle sizes of 114.6 nm, 134.1 nm, 154.8 nm, and 168.7 nm were recorded for the corresponding Tween 80 concentrations. Overall, the results indicated that increasing the concentrations of both Tween 80 and PEG 400 led to a progressive increase in particle size.

Fig 6.7: Contour Plot

3) 3D Surface Plot:

The particle size of the formulations was significantly influenced by the concentrations of Tween 80 and PEG 400. At a PEG 400 concentration of 0.8 mL, particle sizes increased from 72.4 nm to 108.9 nm as the Tween 80 concentration increased from 1.6 mL to 6.4 mL. Similarly, at 1.6 mL PEG 400, particle sizes of 86.2 nm, 101.5 nm, 118.3 nm, and 132.6 nm were obtained corresponding to Tween 80 concentrations of 1.6 mL, 3.2 mL, 4.8 mL, and 6.4 mL, respectively. Further increases in PEG 400 concentration resulted in a corresponding increase in particle size. At 2.4 mL PEG 400, particle sizes of 99.8 nm, 119.7 nm, 139.5 nm, and 153.2 nm were observed, while at 3.2 mL PEG 400, the particle sizes further increased to 114.6 nm, 134.1 nm, 154.8 nm, and 168.7 nm with increasing Tween 80 concentrations. The 3D surface plot further confirmed this trend by demonstrating a gradual increase in particle size with increasing concentrations of both Tween 80 and PEG 400. The inclined surface indicated a positive interaction between the two independent variables, where higher concentrations contributed to larger particle sizes. Additionally, the color transition from blue/green to red represented the increase in particle size values, with lower values observed at lower factor levels and higher values at elevated concentrations.

Fig 6.8: 3D Surface Plot

Fit Summary Response

2: Zeta

Table no 6.7: Response 2: Zeta

Source

Sequential p-value

Lack of Fit p-value

Adjusted R²

Predicted R²

 

Linear

0.0063

 

0.7536

0.4850

 

2FI

0.0250

 

0.9015

0.8275

Suggested

Quadratic

0.6722

 

0.8740

0.5487

 

Cubic

0.7455

 

0.7899

-3.7869

Aliased

 

Source

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F-value

p-value

 

Model

493.53

3

164.51

25.39

0.0019

significant

A-Tween 80

26.09

1

26.09

4.03

0.1011

 

B-PEG 400

106.47

1

106.47

16.44

0.0098

 

ANOVA for 2FI model

AB

64.80

1

64.80

10.00

0.0250

Residual

32.39

5

6.48

 

 

Cor Total

525.92

8

 

 

 

Factor coding is Coded. Sum of squares is Type III - Partial

The Model F-value of 25.39 implies the model is significant. There is only a 0.19% chance that an F-value this large could occur due to noise.

P-values less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant. In this case B, AB are significant model terms. Values greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant. If there are many insignificant model terms (not counting those required to support hierarchy), model reduction may improve your model.

Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors

-110.376 + -29.1979 * A + -58.9896 * B + -25.1562 * AB

The equation in terms of coded factors can be used to make predictions about the response for given levels of each factor. By default, the high levels of the factors are coded as +1 and the low levels are coded as -1. The coded equation is useful for identifying the relative impact of the factors by comparing the factor coefficients.

1) Predicted vs Actual Plot:

The predicted versus actual plot for zeta potential demonstrated good agreement between the experimentally observed and model-predicted values. Most data points were located close to the diagonal reference line, indicating that the selected model provided an adequate fit and reliable prediction of zeta potential values. Minor deviations observed for a few data points may be attributed to experimental variability and small prediction errors.

The color gradient ranging from blue to red represented the variation in zeta potential values, where more negative values (approximately −40 mV) were indicated in blue and less negative values.

Fig 6.9: Predicted versus actual plot for zeta potential

2) Contour Plot

The contour plot indicated that zeta potential became less negative with an increase in Tween 80 concentration, particularly at lower levels of PEG 400, whereas higher concentrations of PEG 400 maintained the system in a comparatively more negative region. The most negative zeta potential region was observed in the upper and upper-left region of the contour plot, while the least negative region appeared at higher Tween 80 concentrations combined with lower PEG 400 levels.

Contour analysis demonstrated that the zeta potential values of the formulations ranged from approximately −40.4 to −18.4 mV. Under the experimental condition of Tween 80 = 3.2 mL and PEG 400 = 0.8 mL, a zeta potential value of −18.4 mV was obtained. Overall, the results indicated that increasing Tween 80 concentration shifted the zeta potential toward less negative values, whereas higher PEG 400 concentrations contributed to maintaining more negative zeta potential values.

Fig 6.10: Contour plot

3) 3D Surface Plot:

The 3D surface plot illustrated the influence of Tween 80 and PEG 400 concentrations on the zeta potential of the formulation. A minimum zeta potential value of −40.4 mV was observed at higher concentrations of the co-surfactant/solvent, whereas the maximum value within the studied range was −18.4 mV. The curvature of the response surface indicated a significant interaction between the two formulation variables, suggesting that the surfactant-to-co-surfactant ratio plays a critical role in maintaining the electrical charge and stability of the nanoemulsion system. The optimization study demonstrated that higher concentrations of PEG 400 within the design space were favorable for achieving a stable formulation with zeta potential values exceeding −30 mV-30\ \mathrm{mV}−30 mV. The formulation exhibited maximum stability in the region represented by the blue zone on the 3D surface plot, which was therefore selected for further characterization and long-term stability studies.

Fig 6.11: 3D surface plot demonstrates

Solutions

2 Solutions found

Number

Tween 80

PEG 400

Particle size

Zeta

Desirability

1

1.600

0.800

73.556

-38.119

0.906

2

1.600

0.840

75.657

-38.265

0.895

The equation in terms of coded factors can be used to make predictions about the response for given levels of each factor. By default, the high levels of the factors are coded as +1 and the low levels are coded as -1. The coded equation is useful for identifying the relative impact of the factors by comparing the factor coefficients.

Fig 6.12: Desirability Ramp plot

Results of Particle Size and Zet

Table no 6.8: Results of Particle Size and Zeta

Run

Particle Size (nm)

Zeta (mv)

R1

106.8

-18.4

R2

67.5

-23.4

R3

88.9

-39.7

R4

85.2

-39.4

R5

118.9

-38.2

R6

139.5

-35.5

R7

93.3

-36.3

R8

117.3

-27

R9

127.2

-40.4

Particle size Results of Optimized Batch (R4)

   

A: Particle Size of Optimized Batch (R4)  B: Zeta Potential of Optimized Batch (R4)

Optimized  Batch:

       

Fig 6.13: Optimized Batch of Nanoemulgel

Formulation R4 was identified as the optimized batch due to its desirable particle size (85.2 nm) and high zeta potential (−39.4 mV), indicating excellent stability of the nanoemulsion system. The optimized combination of Tween 80 and PEG 400 in this formulation provided a favorable balance between droplet size and surface charge. Therefore, formulation R4 was considered the most suitable candidate for further development of the nanoemulgel system.

Evaluation of Optimized batch (R4) of Nanoemulgel :

a) Physical Property

Table no 6.8: Physical Properties of Nanoemulgel

Sr. No

Parameters Observation

Observation

1

Colour

Yellow

2

Odor

Characteristic

3

Texture

Smooth

b) pH Determination

The pH of the prepared nanoemulgel was found to be 5.7, which falls within the acceptable range for topical formulations and is compatible with the physiological pH of the skin. This indicates the suitability of the formulation for dermal application with minimal risk of skin irritation.

Fig 6.14: pH Determination

c) Spreadability Test:

The spreadability of the prepared nanoemulgel was determined to be 6.41 g·cm/sec, indicating satisfactory spreadability characteristics. This result suggests that the formulation can be easily applied and uniformly distributed over the skin surface, which is essential for effective topical drug delivery.

Formula= S= m × l/ t

S=100 × 6.5/60

S= 6.41 g·cm/sec

Fig 6.15: Spreadability Test

a) Rheological study:

Table no 6.9: Rheological study

Sr.no

Speed (rpm)

Viscosity (cP)

1

10

46140

2

20

20850

3

30

14080

The viscosity of the prepared nanoemulgel was measured using a Brookfield Viscometer and found to be 46140 cP at 10 rpm, 20850 cP at 20 rpm, and 14080 cP at 30 rpm. The decrease in viscosity with increasing shear rate indicates pseudoplastic (shear-thinning) behavior, which is desirable for easy application and spreading of the gel on the skin.

Fig 6.16: Viscosity of the prepared nanoemulgel

b) Weight of the nanoemulgel:

Weight of empty collapsible tube =3.66gm

Weight of collapsible tube with nanoemulgel = 23.61gm

Net weight of nanoemulgel= 23.61 - 3.66

= 19.93 gm

     

Fig 6.17: Weight of Nanoemulgel

7. CONCLUSION

The present study successfully developed and optimized a nanoemulgel formulation containing curcumin and berberine hydrochloride for the topical management of psoriasis. The incorporation of nanoemulsion technology significantly improved drug solubility, physicochemical stability, and transdermal permeation. Among the developed formulations, batch R4 was identified as the optimized formulation based on its desirable particle size and high zeta potential, indicating enhanced colloidal stability and potential therapeutic performance. The optimized formulation also exhibited suitable physicochemical characteristics, including acceptable pH, satisfactory spreadability, and pseudoplastic rheological behavior, confirming its suitability for topical application.

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the compatibility between the active pharmaceutical ingredients and the selected excipients, while molecular docking studies supported the potential anti-psoriatic activity of curcumin and berberine through inhibition of key pro-inflammatory signaling pathways. Overall, the developed herbal nanoemulgel represents a promising, safe, and effective topical delivery system for psoriasis management, with the added advantages of improved patient compliance and reduced adverse effects. However, further in vivo pharmacodynamic studies.

8. FUTURE PROSPECTS

1) Cell Line Studies (In-vitro Evaluation) Perform studies on human keratinocyte cell lines.

2) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

3) In-vitro and Ex-vivo Studies.

4) In-vivo Studies (Animal Studies).

5) Drug Release Kinetics.

REFERENCES

  1. Shinde S, Sabale P, Ghadage A, Patil S, Kulkarni S. Herbal approaches to psoriasis: Insights into medicinal plants and their mechanism of action. Int J Pharm Sci. 2026;4(2):1011-1026.
  2. Griffiths CEM, Barker JNWN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263-271.
  3. Lowes MA, Suárez-Fariñas M, Krueger JG. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:227-255.
  4. Gupta S, Gupta J, Anand A, Ojha S. A review on nanogel/emulgel formulations of traditional medicines. Journal Name. 2022;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  5. Shakeel F, Ramadan W, Ahmed MA. Investigation of nanoemulsion for transdermal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(4):1099-1106.
  6. Chellapa P, Mohamed AT, Keleb EI, Elmahgoubi A, Eid AM, Issa YS, et al. Nanoemulsion and nanoemulgel as a topical formulation. IOSR J Pharm. 2015;5(10):43-47.
  7. Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: An advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:123-127.
  8. Alhasso B, Ghori MU, Rout SP, Conway BR. Development of a nanoemulgel for the topical application of mupirocin. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2387.
  9. Jivani MN, Patel CP, Prajapati BG. Nanoemulgel: Innovative approach for topical gel-based formulation. Journal Name. 2018;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  10. Shelke MB, Godage RK, Mankar SD. Nanoemulgel as recent drug delivery system: Updated review. Journal Name. Year;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  11. Dileep, Tintu I, Sadasivan C, KV. Molecular docking studies of curcumin analogs with phospholipase A2. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2011;3:189-197.
  12. Miksusanti M, Apriani EF, Bihurinin AHB. Optimization of Tween 80 and PEG-400 concentration in Indonesian virgin coconut oil nanoemulsion as antibacterial against Staphylococcus aureus. Sains Malays. 2023;52(4):1259-1272.
  13. Abdallah MH, Abu Lila AS, El-Nahas HM, Ibrahim TM. Optimization of potential nanoemulgels for boosting transdermal glimepiride delivery and upgrading its anti-diabetic activity. Gels. 2023;9:494.
  14. BenchChem Technical Support Team. Optimization of stirring in nanoemulsion preparation [Internet]. BenchChem Technical Support Center; 2026 Mar [cited 2026 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.benchchem.com
  15. Rodríguez-Burneo N, Busquets MA, Estelrich J. Magnetic nanoemulsions: Comparison between nanoemulsions formed by ultrasonication and by spontaneous emulsification. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:190.
  16. Schreiner TB, Santamaria-Echart A, Ribeiro A, Peres AM, Dias MM, Pinho SP, et al. Formulation and optimization of nanoemulsions using the natural surfactant saponin from Quillaja bark. Processes. 2020;8:369.
  17. Rajput H, Sahil. Formation of nano-emulsion. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2023;18(6):46-53.
  18. Bramhane AV, Kulthi S, Barwal N. Formulation and evaluation of curcumin gel. Int J Res Publ Rev. 2025;6(5):8042-8047.
  19. Algahtani MS, Ahmad MZ, Nourein IH, Albarqi HA, Alyami HS, Alyami MH, et al. Preparation and characterization of curcumin nanoemulgel utilizing ultrasonication technique for wound healing: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation. Gels. 2021;7:213.
  20. Kulkarni GS, Swamy S, Sheeba FR. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of curcumin and its bioavailability study. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017;10(12):4121-4128.

Reference

  1. Shinde S, Sabale P, Ghadage A, Patil S, Kulkarni S. Herbal approaches to psoriasis: Insights into medicinal plants and their mechanism of action. Int J Pharm Sci. 2026;4(2):1011-1026.
  2. Griffiths CEM, Barker JNWN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263-271.
  3. Lowes MA, Suárez-Fariñas M, Krueger JG. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:227-255.
  4. Gupta S, Gupta J, Anand A, Ojha S. A review on nanogel/emulgel formulations of traditional medicines. Journal Name. 2022;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  5. Shakeel F, Ramadan W, Ahmed MA. Investigation of nanoemulsion for transdermal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(4):1099-1106.
  6. Chellapa P, Mohamed AT, Keleb EI, Elmahgoubi A, Eid AM, Issa YS, et al. Nanoemulsion and nanoemulgel as a topical formulation. IOSR J Pharm. 2015;5(10):43-47.
  7. Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: An advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:123-127.
  8. Alhasso B, Ghori MU, Rout SP, Conway BR. Development of a nanoemulgel for the topical application of mupirocin. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2387.
  9. Jivani MN, Patel CP, Prajapati BG. Nanoemulgel: Innovative approach for topical gel-based formulation. Journal Name. 2018;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  10. Shelke MB, Godage RK, Mankar SD. Nanoemulgel as recent drug delivery system: Updated review. Journal Name. Year;Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
  11. Dileep, Tintu I, Sadasivan C, KV. Molecular docking studies of curcumin analogs with phospholipase A2. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2011;3:189-197.
  12. Miksusanti M, Apriani EF, Bihurinin AHB. Optimization of Tween 80 and PEG-400 concentration in Indonesian virgin coconut oil nanoemulsion as antibacterial against Staphylococcus aureus. Sains Malays. 2023;52(4):1259-1272.
  13. Abdallah MH, Abu Lila AS, El-Nahas HM, Ibrahim TM. Optimization of potential nanoemulgels for boosting transdermal glimepiride delivery and upgrading its anti-diabetic activity. Gels. 2023;9:494.
  14. BenchChem Technical Support Team. Optimization of stirring in nanoemulsion preparation [Internet]. BenchChem Technical Support Center; 2026 Mar [cited 2026 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.benchchem.com
  15. Rodríguez-Burneo N, Busquets MA, Estelrich J. Magnetic nanoemulsions: Comparison between nanoemulsions formed by ultrasonication and by spontaneous emulsification. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:190.
  16. Schreiner TB, Santamaria-Echart A, Ribeiro A, Peres AM, Dias MM, Pinho SP, et al. Formulation and optimization of nanoemulsions using the natural surfactant saponin from Quillaja bark. Processes. 2020;8:369.
  17. Rajput H, Sahil. Formation of nano-emulsion. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2023;18(6):46-53.
  18. Bramhane AV, Kulthi S, Barwal N. Formulation and evaluation of curcumin gel. Int J Res Publ Rev. 2025;6(5):8042-8047.
  19. Algahtani MS, Ahmad MZ, Nourein IH, Albarqi HA, Alyami HS, Alyami MH, et al. Preparation and characterization of curcumin nanoemulgel utilizing ultrasonication technique for wound healing: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation. Gels. 2021;7:213.
  20. Kulkarni GS, Swamy S, Sheeba FR. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of curcumin and its bioavailability study. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017;10(12):4121-4128.

Photo
Pranit Sabale
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Samiksha Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Vaishnavi Mali
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Srushti Gaikwad
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Suraksha Shetty
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Sakshi Mali
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Photo
Gouri Mirje
Co-author

Department of pharmaceutical chemistry, Annasaheb Dange College of B Pharmacy, Ashta, Sangli, Walwa. 416301

Pranit Sabale, Samiksha Patil, Vaishnavi Mali, Srushti Gaikwad, Suraksha Shetty, Sakshi Mali, Gouri Mirje, Herbal Nanoemulgel: A Novel Herbal Topical Approach for the Management of Psoriasis, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 7, 4721-4746. https://10.5281/zenodo.21508975

More related articles
An Overview of Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems:...
Shubham More, Abdul Kalam, Dr. Deepak Sonawane...
Deciphering The Spasmolytic Blueprint Of Azadirach...
Snehal Jogdand, Divya Kelkar, Alinvas Khureshi, Rudrani Kathale, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Face Serum (Liquorice)...
C. Saranya, S. Vinodhini, P. Vignesh, G. Vedhashree, V. Ponnuvel, P. Madhavan...
Role of Sublingual Drug Delivery in Parkinson's Disease Management ...
Bhavana Thorat , Rajendra Patil, Dhanajay Ghodke , Amrata Mantri...
Pharmacological Evaluation of Vitis vinifera Extracts: Phytochemistry, Biologica...
Leela Priya S. , Usha A., Abirami M., Kavithra A., Preetham kevin A. , A. Sathish , Mariyammal A. ...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Nail Lacquer for Treatment of Onychomycosis...
Varsha Bhoje, Heena Patil, Girish Udgave , Gouri Sutar, Diksha Rokade, Dhaval Aldar...
Chlorhexidine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications, Che...
Romit Limbachiya, Dr. C. N. Patel, Dr. Khushbu Patel, Dip Patel...
A Review on Medicinal Plant with Antioxidant Properties...
Hippale Sakshi, Karad Shrinivas, Chaure Anita...