View Article

Abstract

The first reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of canagliflozin and metformin has been developed and validated to be a simple, sensitive, rapid, specific, precise, and accurate method. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a C18 column (250×4.6 mm-5 ?m p.s.). 0.01 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and acetonitrile (65:35, v/v) as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. UV detection was operated at 254 nm, and injection volume was 20 ?l. The proposed method showed good linearity, accuracy, and precision and was successfully applied for the determination of the drugs in laboratory-prepared pharmaceutical dosage forms.The current method has been statistically validated according to the ICH guidelines, and this method has been subsequently developed and applied successfully to determine the levels of metformin hydrochloride and canagliflozin in a combined formulation and in the routine quality control analysis with good accuracy and sensitivity.

Keywords

Canagliflozin, Metformin hydrochloride, RP-HPLC, UV- Spectroscopy

Introduction

× Popup Image

On March 29, 2013, the FDA authorized canagliflozin, making it the country's first sodium glucose co-transportor 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. For individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, canagliflozin is recommended as a supplement to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control. Canagliflozin should not be used to treat diabetic ketoacidosis or in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In 1950, French physician Jean Sterne started studying metformin in humans after it was discovered in 1922. Metformin is mostly used to treat type-2 diabetes, however its usage in polycystic ovarian syndrome is growing. Diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain are common adverse effects of metformin, which is normally well tolerated. The first-line treatment for type-2 diabetes is metformin, which is sold under the trade name Glucophage. By specifically blocking renal sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2), canagliflozin increases the excretion of glucose in the urine. This mode of action is independent of insulin and may be used in conjunction with other oral antidiabetic medications.

Fig 1: Structure of Canagliflozin.

SGLT2, which is responsible for over 90% of renal glucose reabsorption, is inhibited by canagliflozin. As a result, the amount of glucose that is filtered through the glomeruli and enters the tubular lumen determines how effective this medication is. As a result, it works best in individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. In addition to lowering blood glucose, it has numerous additional positive effects, such as lowering glycosylated hemoglobin levels as a result of improved blood glucose regulation. Additionally, it increased the liver's sensitivity to insulin by lowering blood glucose levels, which in turn decreased the liver's synthesis of glucose. In T2DM patients, this lowers the body's overall gluco-toxic condition and aids in lowering serum insulin levels. Patients using this medication have a negative energy balance and weight loss as a result of the calories being expelled from their bodies in the form of glucose in their urine, which is advantageous for T2DM patients once more. Because of its diuretic impact and slight weight loss, this medication also lowers blood pressure. Because it causes minor weight reduction, it also has a favorable effect on blood lipids.

A collection of metabolic disorders characterized by elevated blood glucose levels is referred to as diabetes mellitus.  The bigunaide class of oral antihyperglycemic medications includes the anti-diabetic medication metformin hydrochloride.  6.2-hour half-life. The activity lasts for eight to twelve hours.  Metformin lowers blood glucose levels via reducing intestinal glucose absorption and hepatic glucose synthesis. Different concentrations of polymers of different grades of HPMC, carboxymethyl cellulose, calcium phosphate dibasic anhydrous, micro crystalline cellulose, PVP, and lactose monohydrate were used to make metformin hydrochloride and gliclazide. Different pellet forms, such as disintegrating pellets, coated pellets, and metformin pellets, were found to have separate effects on the formulation. An HPMC/PVA-based TDS-patch was created to assess the impact of pH on transdermal medication delivery. Floating Metformin HCl tablets are intended to extend the stomach residence time following oral delivery and have demonstrated sustained release through appropriate duration of action at a specific region. Metformin HCl's chemical formula is -1-carbamimidamido-N, N-dimethymethanimidamide. C4H11N5 is the molecular formula.HCL has a molecular weight of 165.63 and a melting point of 165.63. The solubility is nearly insoluble in acetone, ether, and chloroform but freely soluble in water and methanol.

Fig 2: Structure of Metformin HCl

Compared to other classes of oral antihyperglycemic medications, metformin has a different mode of action. Metformin lowers blood glucose levels by reducing intestinal glucose absorption and hepatic glucose synthesis. It also improves insulin sensitivity by enhancing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Metformin's early activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a liver enzyme crucial to insulin signaling, the body's overall energy balance, and the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates, mediates these effects. Improved insulin binding to insulin receptors may be the cause of increased peripheral glucose consumption.
In skeletal muscle, metformin treatment also raises AMPK activation. Insulin-independent glucose absorption is known to occur when GLUT4 is deployed to the plasma membrane by AMPK.

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

An isocratic RP-HPLC method was performed on a Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC system with 515 HPLC pump, equipped with 2998 Photo Diode Array (PDA) detector and Empower 2 software for processing and data collecting. Kromasil particle size) is used as a stationary phase. An ultrasonic bath sonicator (Frontline FS 4, Mumbai, India), semi-micro analytical balance (India) and Whatman filter paper No. 41 is used in the study.

Preparation of mobile phase

An accurately weighed quantity of 0.77 g of Ammonium acetate was taken into a 1000 mL beaker and diluted to 1000 mL with HPLC grade water and degassed in ultrasonic water bath and filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter using vacuum filtration gives required buffer concentration of 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer and the pH was adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid. 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer with pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid were mixed with HPLC grade Acetonitrile in the proportion of 65:35, v/v and it was filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter and degassed by ultrasonication.

Preparation of MET and CAN mixed standard drug stock solutions

The mixed standard drug stock solutions of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin were prepared by dissolving 500 mg of Metformin Hydrochloride and 50 mg of Canagliflozin in 100 mL of mobile phase into a 100 mL of volumetric flask and then sonicated to dissolve it completely to get the concentration of 5000 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 500 μg/mL of Canagliflozin.

Chromatographic Parameters:

Equipment: Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC system with 2998 PDA detector

Mobile Phase : 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and Acetonitrile (65:35, v/v)

Flow rate : 1 mL/min

Detection Wavelength: 254 nm

Column temperature: Ambient

Run time : 8 minutes

Method validation for bio-analytical studies consist of procedures that shows a suitable method for quantitative analysis of drug analytes present in the biological fluids such as blood, plasma, serum and urine was reproducible and reliable for the future purpose. The essential factors for bio-analytical method validation consist of: (1) Accuracy (2) Precision (3) Selectivity (4) Sensitivity (5) Reproducibility and (6) Stability.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Method optimization

For the optimisation of RP-HPLC method several parameters and mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation and good peak symmetry for Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin were obtained with Kromasil C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 m particle size) and mobile phase containing a mixture of 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and Acetonitrile (65:35, v/v) was delivered at a flow rate of 1 mL/min to get better reproducibility and repeatability. Both Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin were scanned in the wavelength region of 200-400 nm by using photo diode array (PDA) detector. Quantitation was attained with a PDA detector at 254 nm depends on peak area. Therefore 254 nm was selected as detection wavelength in the present study. The retention time of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin was found to be 2.440 min and 3.713 min respectively. A typical chromatogram of blank, standard and sample solution of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Chromatogram of blank, standard and sample solution of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin

Specificity

The effect of excipients and other additives usually present in the combined dosage form of MET and CAN in the determination under optimum conditions was investigated and confirms that there is no interference. The specificity of the RP-HPLC method was established by injecting the placebo solution into the HPLC system.

Table no:1  Performance calculations and system suitability parameters of MET and CAN

Parameters

MET

CAN

Acceptance limits

Retention time (min)

2.440

3.713

-----

Theoretical plates (N)

4216

12854

Not less than 2000

Asymmetry factor

1.36

1.16

Not more than 2

Resolution

8.95

More than 2

Linearity range (µg/mL)

50-300

5-30

-----

Limit of detection (LOD) (µg/mL)

0.27

0.01

-----

Limit of quantification (LOQ) (µg/mL)

0.83

0.04

-----

Linearity

An aliquots of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mL from the mixed standard drug stock solutions of 5000 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 500 μg/mL of Canagliflozin was pippetted out and then transferred into the series of 10 mL of volumetric flask and volume make upto 10 mL with

the mobile phase to get a concentration of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30μg/mL of Canagliflozin respectively. All the above solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter and then 20 L of each solution

was injected three times into the HPLC system. Least square regression analysis was carried out for the slope, intercept and correlation coefficient. Calibration curve were constructed by plotting peak area versus concentration (μg/mL) is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Standard calibration curves of MET and CAN

Accuracy

The accuracy of the proposed method was determined by calculating the recoveries of MET and CAN by standard addition method. Recovery studies were carried out by adding concentration level of 50 %, 100 % and 150 % of standard drug solution of MET and CAN to the preanalysed sample solution of Invokamet® tablet powder and the mixtures were re-analysed by the proposed method. Three replicates were prepared for each concentration level and was injected into the HPLC system and the results were obtained by using following formula and also confirm the accuracy of the proposed method were reported in Table 2.

Table no: 2 Results of accuracy studies of MET

Concentration Level in %

Amount added (µg/mL)

Amount recovered (µg/mL)

% Recovery

% Mean Recovery

RSD %

S1:50%

100

100.04

100.04

 

99.84

 

0.68

S2:50%

100

100.40

100.40

S3:50%

100

99.08

99.08

S4:100%

200

199.50

99.75

 

100.65

 

0.78

S5:100%

200

202.42

101.21

S6:100%

200

202

101.00

S7:150%

300

298.01

99.34

 

99.45

 

0.29

S8:150%

300

299.33

99.78

S9 :150%

300

297.70

99.23

Table no: 3 Results of accuracy studies of CAN

Concentration Level in %

Amount added (µg/mL)

Amount recovered (µg/mL)

% Recovery

% Mean Recovery

RSD %

S1:50%

10

10.01

100.11

 

100.74

 

0.85

S2:50%

10

10.03

100.39

S3:50%

10

10.17

101.73

S4:100%

20

20.04

100.20

 

100.06

 

0.36

S5:100%

20

20.06

100.35

S6:100%

20

19.93

99.65

S7:150%

30

30.09

100.33

 

99.95

 

0.5

S8:150%

30

30.04

100.16

S9 :150%

30

29.81

99.39

Precision

The precision of the proposed method was performed to express the closeness of agreement between a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogeneous sample under the optimized conditions. Precision are of three levels they are repeatability, intermediate precision and reproducibility. Repeatability was carried out by calculating method and system precision. Method precision was performed by injecting six times of a homogenous sample preparation of 200 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 20 μg/mL of Canagliflozin of a single batch sample solution of Invokamet® tablet powder into the HPLC system to ensure that the analytical method is working properly. The results of method precision of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin were reported in Table 4 and Table 5.

Table 4 Method precision of Metformin Hydrochloride

Injection No.

Name of the drug

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

1

MET

200

2.438

896027

99.35

2

MET

200

2.438

898822

99.66

3

MET

200

2.439

897108

99.47

4

MET

200

2.439

901800

100.00

5

MET

200

2.440

903334

100.17

6

MET

200

2.443

898203

99.60

Average

2.439

899215.7

99.71

SD

0.001871

2808.194

0.311

RSD %

0.076

0.31

0.31

Table 5 Method precision of Canagliflozin

Injection No.

Name of the drug

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

1

CAN

20

3.713

734744

99.73

2

CAN

20

3.714

739030

100.31

3

CAN

20

3.717

730041

99.09

4

CAN

20

3.717

732051

99.37

5

CAN

20

3.718

733069

99.50

6

CAN

20

3.732

731465

99.29

Average

3.718

733400

99.55

SD

0.006892

3176.8

0.43

RSD %

0.18

0.43

0.43

Limit of detection and Limit of quantitation

Limit of detection is a smallest concentration of an analyte which gives a measurable response. Limit of quantitation is a smallest concentration of an analyte that gives a measurable response which can be quantified accurately. LOD and LOQ are calculated by using following formula and the results of LOD and LOQ of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin were reported in Table. Robustness of the method was carried out by deliberately changing the composition of mobile phase by altering the proportion of organic phase by ±10 % and column temperature by ± 2°C. There are no marked variations were observed in the system suitability parameters and the results of robustness were reported in Table 6 and 7.

Table 6. Robustness data of Metformin Hydrochloride

Variations in method parameters

Retention Time (mins)

Average peak area*

RSD %

System suitability parameters

Theoretical Plates

Asymmetry

Buffer : ACN (68:32,v/v)

2.426

912558

1.4

3861

1.48

Buffer : ACN (62:38,v/v)

2.431

886527

0.41

3887

1.47

28°C Column temperature

2.426

911899

1.3

3861

1.48

32°C Column temperature

2.196

802965

0.32

3525

1.44

Table 7 Robustness data of Canagliflozin

Variations in method parameters

Retention Time (mins)

Average peak area*

RSD %

System suitability parameters

Theoretical Plates

Asymmetry

Buffer : ACN (68:32,v/v)

3.626

724007

0.58

11949

1.19

Buffer : ACN (62:38,v/v)

3.689

716425

0.61

11538

1.19

28°C Column temperature

3.626

720694

0.74

11963

1.18

32°C Column temperature

3.335

636649

0.59

11017

1.19

Solution stability study

Solution stability was carried out to ensure that the sample solutions of 200 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 20 μg/mL of Canagliflozin were found to be stable upto 48 hrs at room temperature. Solution stability was performed by injecting six times of a homogenous sample preparation of 200 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 20 μg/mL of Canagliflozin of a single batch sample solution of Invokamet® tablet powder in different time intervals i.e. 0, 8, 16, 24, 32 and 48 hrs at room temperature into the HPLC system. The RSD % of the assay of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin during solution stability studies was within 2 % and it was found that the sample solutions of 200 μg/mL of Metformin Hydrochloride and 20 μg/mL of Canagliflozin are stable upto 48 hrs at room temperature. The results of solution stability of

Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin upto 48 hrs at room temperature were reported in Table 8 and Table 9.

Table 8 Solution stability of MET upto 48 hrs at room temperature

Time intervals (hrs)

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

Theoretical Plates

Asymmetry

0

200

2.438

898066

99.58

4214

1.35

8

200

2.438

897132

99.48

4124

1.36

16

200

2.438

895511

99.30

4146

1.37

24

200

2.440

900003

99.80

4146

1.37

32

200

2.440

896525

99.41

4183

1.36

48

200

2.444

902170

100.04

4185

1.37

Average

2.439

898234

99.60

4166

1.36

SD

0.002338

2457.62

0.274

33.218

0.0082

RSD %

0.09

0.27

0.27

0.7

0.59

Table 9 Solution stability of ACN upto 48 hrs at room temperature

Time intervals (hrs)

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

Theoretical Plates

Asymmetry

0

20

3.709

728817

99.61

12204

1.14

8

20

3.710

729244

99.66

12260

1.16

16

20

3.713

730140

99.79

12254

1.15

24

20

3.715

727898

99.48

12219

1.15

32

20

3.718

728235

99.53

12255

1.16

48

20

3.727

727799

99.47

12266

1.14

Average

3.715

728688

99.59

12243

1.15

SD

0.006593

900.412

0.12

25.219

0.00894

RSD %

0.17

0.12

0.12

0.20

0.77

CONCLUSION:

A simple, rapid, accurate, precise, sensitive, and robust RP-HPLC method was successfully developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Metformin Hydrochloride (MET) and Canagliflozin (CAN) in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms in accordance with ICH guidelines. The method demonstrated excellent linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, and robustness, with satisfactory recovery and low detection and quantification limits. Stability and forced degradation studies confirmed that the method is stability-indicating and capable of effectively separating degradation products from the analytes. Therefore, the developed RP-HPLC method is reliable and suitable for routine quality control, stability testing, and pharmaceutical analysis of MET and CAN in combined dosage formulations.

REFERENCES

  1. Niessen WMA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, chromatographic science series, 2006, 97, 3rd edition, Taylor and Francis, London.
  2. Marvin CM. LC/MS: A Practical User's Guide, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
  3.  Niessen WMA, Voyksner RD. Current Practice in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, 1st Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  4. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 2010, 3rd Edition, 185.
  5. The European Medicines Agency, Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 2009, EMEA/410412/2007, London.
  6. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines, 1996, 1-8.
  7. United States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary, Asian Edition 24, the United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc., U.S.A., 2149- 2152.
  8. Quality Assurance of Pharmaceuticals, (A compendium of guidelines and related materials), 1997, 1, WHO, Geneva, 119-124.
  9. ICH Guidelines Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Current Step 4 version Parent Guideline, 1994, 1-13.
  10. Takahashi Y, Amano Y, Yuki T, Ose T, Miyake T, Kushiyama Y, Sato S, Ishihara S and Kinoshita Y. Influence of acid suppressants on gastric emptying: cross-over analysis in healthy volunteers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21(11):1664-8.
  11. Porro PB. Famotidine in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulceration: overview of clinical experience. Digestion 1985; 32 (1): 62- 69.
  12. Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine, an Updated Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Peptic Ulcer Disease and Other Allied Diseases. Drugs 1989; 38 (4): 551–590.
  13. Schunack W. Pharmacology of H2-receptor antagonists: an overview. The Journal of International Medical Research 1989; 17(1): 9A-16A.
  14. Savio CR, Irfan S and Richard WM. Domperidone: Review of Pharmacology and Clinical Applications in Gastroenterology. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 102: 2036–2045.
  15. Deshpande P, Gandhi S, Vandana B, Raviraj B, Abhijeet D, Vrushali Diwale. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2010; 1(4): 354-359.
  16. Helali N, Darghouth F, Monser L. RP-HPLC Determination of Famotidine and its Potential Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Chromatographia 2004; 60(7): 455–460.
  17. Ahsanul Haque Md, Shahriar Md, Parvin MN and Ashraful Islam S M. Validated RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Ranitidine Hydrochloride, Domperidone and Naproxen in Solid Dosage Form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; 1(3): 59-63.
  18.  Sahu R, Preeti Nagar, Bhattacharya S, Deepti Jain. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of famotidine and domperidone in combined tablet dosage form. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2006; 68(4): 503-506.
  19. Dipali D. Tajane, Sacchidanand R. Gite, Aditi R. Shah, Arun B. Kale, Ranjit V. Gadhave and Vishnu P. Choudhari. Spectrophotometric Simultaneous Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form by Ratio Derivative and Area under Curve Method. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2011; 2(3): 60-66.
  20. Rajani Sekhar V, Reddy YP, Ramalingam P, Thej DH. RP-HPLC and UV-derivative spectrophotometry technique for the simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and famotidine in pharmaceutical dosage form. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2013; 4(2):160-170.
  21. Patel AH, Patel JK, Patel KN, Rajput GC, Rajgor NB. Development and Validation of Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Domperidone and Rabeprazole Sodium in Bulk andDosage Forms. International Journal on Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 2010; 1(1): 1-5.

Reference

  1. Niessen WMA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, chromatographic science series, 2006, 97, 3rd edition, Taylor and Francis, London.
  2. Marvin CM. LC/MS: A Practical User's Guide, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
  3.  Niessen WMA, Voyksner RD. Current Practice in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, 1st Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  4. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 2010, 3rd Edition, 185.
  5. The European Medicines Agency, Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 2009, EMEA/410412/2007, London.
  6. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines, 1996, 1-8.
  7. United States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary, Asian Edition 24, the United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc., U.S.A., 2149- 2152.
  8. Quality Assurance of Pharmaceuticals, (A compendium of guidelines and related materials), 1997, 1, WHO, Geneva, 119-124.
  9. ICH Guidelines Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Current Step 4 version Parent Guideline, 1994, 1-13.
  10. Takahashi Y, Amano Y, Yuki T, Ose T, Miyake T, Kushiyama Y, Sato S, Ishihara S and Kinoshita Y. Influence of acid suppressants on gastric emptying: cross-over analysis in healthy volunteers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21(11):1664-8.
  11. Porro PB. Famotidine in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulceration: overview of clinical experience. Digestion 1985; 32 (1): 62- 69.
  12. Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine, an Updated Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Peptic Ulcer Disease and Other Allied Diseases. Drugs 1989; 38 (4): 551–590.
  13. Schunack W. Pharmacology of H2-receptor antagonists: an overview. The Journal of International Medical Research 1989; 17(1): 9A-16A.
  14. Savio CR, Irfan S and Richard WM. Domperidone: Review of Pharmacology and Clinical Applications in Gastroenterology. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 102: 2036–2045.
  15. Deshpande P, Gandhi S, Vandana B, Raviraj B, Abhijeet D, Vrushali Diwale. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2010; 1(4): 354-359.
  16. Helali N, Darghouth F, Monser L. RP-HPLC Determination of Famotidine and its Potential Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Chromatographia 2004; 60(7): 455–460.
  17. Ahsanul Haque Md, Shahriar Md, Parvin MN and Ashraful Islam S M. Validated RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Ranitidine Hydrochloride, Domperidone and Naproxen in Solid Dosage Form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; 1(3): 59-63.
  18.  Sahu R, Preeti Nagar, Bhattacharya S, Deepti Jain. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of famotidine and domperidone in combined tablet dosage form. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2006; 68(4): 503-506.
  19. Dipali D. Tajane, Sacchidanand R. Gite, Aditi R. Shah, Arun B. Kale, Ranjit V. Gadhave and Vishnu P. Choudhari. Spectrophotometric Simultaneous Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form by Ratio Derivative and Area under Curve Method. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2011; 2(3): 60-66.
  20. Rajani Sekhar V, Reddy YP, Ramalingam P, Thej DH. RP-HPLC and UV-derivative spectrophotometry technique for the simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and famotidine in pharmaceutical dosage form. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2013; 4(2):160-170.
  21. Patel AH, Patel JK, Patel KN, Rajput GC, Rajgor NB. Development and Validation of Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Domperidone and Rabeprazole Sodium in Bulk andDosage Forms. International Journal on Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 2010; 1(1): 1-5.

Photo
Chandra Sekhar Naik
Corresponding author

Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456.

Photo
Kantubothu Karuna
Co-author

Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456.

Photo
M. Ramakrishna Reddy
Co-author

Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456.

Kantubothu Karuna, M. Ramakrishna Reddy, Chandra Sekhar Naik, Method Development and Validation of Metformin Hydrochloride and Canagliflozin in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Forms by RP-HPLC, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 3191-3200. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20662227

More related articles
Formulation and Optimization of Metoprolol Succina...
Chandra Sekhar Naik , Shabana Parveen, Mallampalli Rani...
Artificial Intelligence in Liquid Biopsy: Transfor...
S. Navaneethakrishnan, A. Santhiya, K. Hemavathi, V. Akash...
Analytical Method Development And Validation of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin by...
Dr. Nilesh Patil, Dr. Parag Patil, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari Rane, Meghana More...
Ethnopharmacological and Phytochemical Basis of Medicinal Plants in Urolithiasis...
Aradhana Kangare , Jayashri Shejul, Snehal Rahate, Varsha Jadhav, Vilas Ghawate...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Hair Scrub Gel...
Piyush Vaidya, Nitin Indurwade, Bhagyashri Sontakke, Priyanka Malekar...
Related Articles
Evaluation of Synergistic In Vitro Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial...
Rohini Chaudhari , Jayshree Shejul, Akshay Dhokane, Varsha Jadhav, Vilas Ghawate...
A Review on the Clinical Presentation of Schizophernia...
M.Prasada Rao, N. Mahesh, S. Rajini, Y. Narasimha Rao...