View Article

  • Preparation and Evaluation of Candesartan Fast Dissolving Tablets for Improved Dissolution Using Solid Dispersion Technique

  • Assistant Professor, Sri Venkateswara College Of Pharmacy Chittoor (A).

Abstract

The current investigation aimed to enhance their aqueous absorption and candesartan dissolving Kinetics, the drug is classified as an antihypertensive agent in class II, through the developing tablets that dissolve quickly, employing the solid-dispersion approach. Solid-dispersions of candesartan were fabricated via the solvent-evaporation technique utilizing hydrophilic polymeric carriers such as Poloxamer 407, PVP K30, and PEG 4000. The optimized dispersions were subsequently incorporated into tablet matrices using highly efficient superdisintegrants-Crospovidone as well as Sodium starch glycolate, through the direct compression methodology. Then the prepared formulations which have been characterized to micromeritic details and invitro disintegration in addition to dissolution performance. Among the developed formulations, batch F2 containing Crospovidone exhibited the most rapid disintegration and achieved approximately 98.85 % cumulative drug release within 45 minutes, signifying a pronounced enhancement in dissolution efficiency relative to the pure drug. FTIR spectral analysis confirmed by the absence of physicochemical incompatibility between drug and the ingredients, confirming development stability. Therefore, optimized solid dispersion system constitutes a promising and scientifically robust strategy for augmenting solubility, dissolution behavior, and oral bioavailability of candesartan, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance

Keywords

candesartan, Solid Dispersion, Fast-Dissolving Tablets, Poloxamer 407, Crospovidone, Dissolution Rate Enhancement

Introduction

× Popup Image

The first alternative to conventional oral dosage forms emerged in the late 1970s with the introduction of quick-dissolving systems designed to improve drug delivery, especially for older people and children’s [1,2]. Water is not required to take mouth tablets that dissolve solid dosage forms that break down rapidly within saliva. After breaking down inside the oral cavity, a drug can enter the body through oral mucosa, pharynx, or esophagus, which makes it work faster and more effectively [2]. Solid oral formulations remain the most preferred dosage forms given that their ease of administration, precise dosing, and better patient adherence [3]. ODTs—also termed mouth-dissolving, fast-melting, or quick-disintegrating tablets— are especially helpful for people those with regular difficulty swallowing pills, such as children, the elderly, and people with mental illness [1].  There are a number of ways to make these formulations, such as mass extrusion, molding, sublimation, lyophilization, direct compression, and spray drying. [2,4]. The inclusion of superdisintegrants facilitates rapid tablet breakup into fine particles, enhancing dissolution and promoting faster drug absorption [3].

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) like Candesartan are frequently used to treat type 2 diabetes patients' hypertension and diabetic nephropathy [4]. It acts by selectively antagonizing angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁) receptors, leading to vascular smooth muscle relaxation, reduced vasoconstriction, and enhanced blood circulation. The drug exhibits an absolute bioavailability of about 60–80%, demonstrates linear pharmacokinetic behavior within the therapeutic range, and possesses an elimination half-life ranging from 11 to 15 hours [5]. However, its low aqueous solubility restricts its dissolution rate and bioavailability. To overcome this limitation, solid dispersion techniques employing hydrophilic carriers have been widely investigated to enhance solubility and dissolving [6,7].

The current study's goal was to enhance the rate of dissolution and solubility for Candesartan through the formulation of solid dispersions utilizing carriers such as Poloxamer 407, PVP K30, and PEG 4000. These dispersions were subsequently incorporated into fast-dissolving tablet formulations employing super disintegrants including Crospovidone as well as Sodium Starch Glycolate (SSG).  To evaluate the efficacy of the devised system, the resultant physical-chemical properties and in-vitro dissolving performance of the tablets have been evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Candesartan was given as a gift obtained from Hyderabad, India's Hetero Drugs Ltd.  Poloxamer 407PVP K30, PEG 4000 was obtained from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd. Crospovidone, SSG were commercially obtained from Ozone ® India, Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd. MCC, talc and Mg Stearate obtained from Chemie Loba Pvt. Ltd.

Pre-formulation studies

Drug Saturation Solubility:

Candesartan's saturation solubility was assessed by mixing an excess of the medication with 25 milliliters, of various dissolving substances including- distilled water, 0.1 N HCl (PH-1.2) and phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), contained in individual conical flasks with a capacity of 50 mL. The flasks were sealed with aluminum foil and placed upside down on a rotary shaker operating at 50 rpm and 37 ± 1 °C for 24 hours. After equilibrium was reached, the Whatman paper filter used for filtering the solutions then appropriately diluted, and measured by using a visible-UV spectrophotometer at a peak wavelength (λ max) of 244 nm.

FTIR Spectroscopy:

Potential interactions among Candesartan and the selected analysis using FT-IR had been utilized in evaluating compounds. The spectra were recorded within 4000–500 cm⁻¹ wavelength region using the KBr pellet technique.   In order to find out whether there are any possible chemical interactions between drug and formulation components, then collected spectra were examined for the presence, absence, or shifting of distinctive peaks [6].

Method

Preparation of Solid Dispersions:

Candesartan was solvent-evaporated to create solid dispersions through hydrophilic carriers such as Poloxamer 407, PEG 4000, and PVP K30 in a 1:1 drug-to-polymer ratio. The drug and polymers were dissolved using methanol.  After that, a dry residue was created by evaporating the solvent at 60 °C. After that, the final mass was kept in a desiccator for a full day to guarantee that any remaining solvent had been completely removed and that it had solidified. Dried dispersions were subsequently pulverized, passed through a #60 mesh sieve, and preserved in airtight containers for further studies [5,7,8].

 Direct Compression Method:

The required quantities of excipients were carefully measured and combined with the drug–carrier dispersing with a pestle and motor, thorough and uniform blending. Pre-compression properties of the resultant powder combination, such as flowability and compressibility, were evaluated. The optimized powder became afterward pressed to tablets utilizing an 8 mm flat-faced punch and a rotating tablet compression apparatus. [9,10,11].

 

Table1: Formulation table for Candesartan mouth dissolving tablets

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

F9

F10

F11

F12

Drug+Poloxamer407(1:1)

60

60

60

60

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Drug+PVK30 (1:1)

-

-

-

-

60

60

60

60

-

-

-

-

Drug+PEG 4000 (1:1)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

60

60

60

60

Crospovidone

20

30

-

-

20

30

-

-

20

30

-

-

Sodium starch glycolate

-

-

20

30

-

-

20

30

-

-

20

30

Talc

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Magnesium stearate

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

MCC

116

106

116

106

116

106

116

106

116

106

116

106

Total wt. of tablets (mg)

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

 

Pre-compression parameters

Angle of repose:

The angle of repose was measured by employing the fixed funnel method, where the height (h) and base radius (r) of the formed powder cone were recorded for calculation. [12]:

θ = tan -1 h/r

Bulk density:

Bulk density refers to the ratio between the mass of a powder and the total volume it occupies. Approximately 2 g of the powder mixture was accurately weighed and gently transferred into a graduated cylinder. After recording the initial untapped volume, the bulk density was computed using the corresponding equation. [13]:

Bulk density= W / Vo

Where,

W = weight of the powder

VO = initial volume

Tapped Density:

A 10 mL graduated cylinder was carefully filled with a measured quantity of the powder blend and subjected to 100 taps to achieve uniform packing. The tapped density was subsequently calculated using the standard formula. [14]:

Tapped density= W / VF

Where,

W = weight of the powder

VF = final volume

Carr’s Index:

Carr’s Index was determined from the bulk and tapped density values to assess the powder’s flowability and compressibility characteristics. The index was calculated using the following equation. [15]:

Carr’s index= tapped density-bulked density/ tapped density×100

Hausner’sRatio:
Hausner's ratio was calculated using bulk and tapped density results to evaluate the mixture flow characteristics.  Good flow qualities are indicated by lower numbers. The ratio was computed utilizing the formula below. [16]:

Hausner ratio=T.D/B.D

 Where, T.D= Tapped density,

 B.D = Bulk density

Post-compression Parameters

WeightVariationTest:

Twelve tablets had been selected in every batch sample as well measured individually with a digital statistical device in order to assess weight consistency. The average tablet weight and the percentage variance of each tablet from the mean were calculated using the following formula.:

                                                               Initial weight- Average weight of tablets

Percentage deviation = ----------------------------------------------------------------- ×100

              Average weight of Tablet

Hardnesstest:
A Monsanto hardness tester was applied to measure the crushing strength of the tablets. Next, all three of tablets were selected at a time for each formulation, and the crushing values were noted in kg/cm². To make sure batch uniformity, the average and standard deviation are estimated.

Thickness:
A mechanical screw gauge was used to measure the diameter of the tablet (micrometer) to verify consistency in tablet dimensions across all formulations [17].

Friability Test:

A Roche friabilator rotating at 25 rpm for 4 minutes (100 rotations) has been utilized to determine friability.  After removing the tablets, the weight reduction % was calculated using the following equation [18]:

% Friability =​ Wi​−Wf​ / Wi×100

Disintegration Test:

The USP disintegration test equipment with a basket arrangement holding six hollow tubes with ten-mesh screens used to determine the duration of disintegration. Then the device was kept at 37 ± 1 °C and run at 28–32 cycles per minute using 900-mL volume with 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2). Each tube contained one tablet, and the period of time needed for a tablet with completely dissolve and all of the particles to flow through the mesh was noted. Every formulation was tested three times to ensure total uniformity. [19].

Drug Content Uniformity:

For drug content analysis, a single tablet were precisely measured along with pulverized. Take 100 milliliter volumetric flask was filled via the weight for one tablet's powder before 0.1 N HCl was added. Then the blend had been sonicated/shaken to ensure complete drug extraction and the same media was used to adjust the volume to 100mL. The solution was filtered, appropriately diluted, after checked with a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 244 nm.   The drug content was calculated using the following formula. [20]:

Contents of drug (%) = Concentration ×dilution factor ×volume flask/1×1000

In-vitro dissolution:

The produced tablets' dissolving capacity was evaluated with a type-2 paddle technique equipment. At 37 ± 0.5 °C and a paddle rotation speed of 50 rpm, the test was carried out in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2). At 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 min, aliquots were removed, filtered, and suitably diluted using the same dissolving media. In order to determine the absorbance at 244 nm, drug release has been identified using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer. [5].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Candesartan exhibited the most absorption at 0.1 N HCl (1.262 mg/mL), followed by phosphate buffer pH 6.8 (0.713 mg/mL) as well as distilled water (0.608 mg/mL). These results indicate that the solubility of Candesartan increases under acidic conditions, confirming its pH-dependent solubility behavior.

 

Table 2: Saturation Solubility studies of Candesartan

S.NO

Solvents

Solubility (mg/ml)

1

Distilled Water

0.608

2

Phosphate buffer (pH-6.8)

0.713

3

0.1 N HCl (pH-1.2)

1.262

 

FTIR Spectroscopy:

FTIR spectral analysis confirmed that the characteristics, Candesartan in the drug–excipient mixtures without notable shifts or disappearance, indicating the absence of chemical incompatibility. These findings demonstrate that Candesartan remains stable and compatible with the selected formulation excipients.

 

 

 

Figure. 1: FT-IR Spectra of Candesartan

 

 

Figure .2: FT-IR Spectra of Candesartan + Poloxamer 407+ PVPK30+ PEG4000+ Crospovidone+ SSG+ Mg Stearate+ Talc+ MCC

 

Table 3: Interpretation data for FTIR spectra of Candesartan

IR absorption bands (cm_1)

 

Bond

 

Functional group

Observed peak

Characteristic peak

3410-3320

3500-3200

N-H / O-H stretching

Amine / H-bonded hydroxyl group

1720.63

1750-1700

C=O stretching

Carboxylic acid / amide group

1563.11, 1485.40

1600-1450

C=C stretching

Aromatic ring

1263.43, 1237.54

1300-1000

C-N / C-O stretching

20 amine / ether group

Table 4: Interpretation data for FTIR spectra of Candesartan+ All Excipients

IR absorption bands (cm_1)

 

 

Bond

 

Functional group

Observed peak

Characteristic peak

3961.23

4000-3700

O-H stretching

Free hydroxyl

3674.00

3700-3600

O-H stretching

Talc / silicate OH groups

3418.68

3500-3200

N-H / O-H stretching

Amine / Hydroxyl

2899.05

3000-2850

C-H stretching

Aliphatic C-H

1562.96

1600-1450

C=C stretching

Aromatic ring

 

 

Table 5: Pre-Compression Studies

Formulation code

Angle of repose(θ)

Bulk density(g/ml)

Tapped density(g/ml)

Carr’s index (%)

Hausner’s ratio

F1

29.05±0.42

0.502±0.04

0.556±0.06

9.71±0.05

1.11±0.01

F2

26.24±0.33

0.452±0.05

0.500±0.04

9.60±0.06

1.11±0.01

F3

28.76±0.36

0.411±0.06

0.456±0.05

9.87±0.07

1.11±0.01

F4

27.80±0.41

0.532±0.004

0.591±0.05

9.98±0.05

1.11±0.01

F5

26.35±0.38

0.501±0.05

0.560±0.06

10.54±0.06

1.12±0.01

F6

26.20±0.40

0.532±0.06

0.604±0.05

11.92±0.07

1.14±0.01

F7

28.89±0.35

0.530±0.04

0.584±0.05

9.25±0.05

1.10±0.01

F8

28.50±0.30

0.530±0.05

0.594±0.04

10.77±0.06

1.12±0.01

F9

27.21±0.39

0.370±0.04

0.410±0.05

9.76±0.07

1.11±0.01

F10

27.93±0.43

0.533±0.05

0.605±0.06

11.90±0.08

1.13±0.01

F11

27.29±0.34

0.523±0.04

0.575±0.05

9.04±0.05

1.10±0.01

F12

28.86±0.32

0.460±0.05

0.500±0.04

8.00±0.06

1.09±0.01

Results are shown in mean ±SD, (n=3)

 

All Candesartan fast-dissolving tablet formulations (F1–F12) exhibited satisfactory post-compression characteristics. The tablets showed uniformity in weight (200.1 ± 1.79 to 204.3 ± 3.50 mg) and thickness (3.47 ± 0.06 to 3.90 ± 0.12 mm). The hardness values (3.2 ± 0.18 to 3.7 ± 0.24 kg/cm²) and low friability (0.395–0.892%) indicated that the tablets possessed adequate mechanical strength. The disintegration time (7 ± 0.58 to 130 ± 45.8 seconds) and wetting time (22–120 seconds) demonstrated rapid tablet dispersion, particularly for the optimized batches. The water absorption ratio (22.14–151.49%) and drug content (0.429–0.969 mg) were within acceptable limits, confirming the uniformity and quality of all formulations.

 

Table 6: Evaluation of Post Compression Parameters of Candesartan Fast Dissolving Tablets(F1-F12)

F. Code

Weight variation

(mg/tablets)

Hardness (kg/cm2)

Thickness (mm)

Friability loss

(% w/w)

Disintegration time (sec)

Drug content(mg)

F1

204.0±2.59

3.2±0.18

3.73±0.12

0.395

12±2.08

0.969

F2

202.0±2.87

3.6±0.17

3.70±0.10

0.492

7±1.53

0.759

F3

201.7±1.37

3.5±0.54

3.70±0.10

0.496

29±7.5

0.724

F4

204.3±3.50

3.6±0.5

3.47±0.06

0.780

27±4.36

0.707

F5

204.1±3.65

3.2±0.29

3.77±0.06

0.784

10±0.58

0.559

F6

203.8±2.40

3.6±0.04

3.90±0.10

0.880

18±2.0

0.669

F7

203.1±3.14

3.5±0.19

3.70±0.11

0.891

24±7.8

0.689

F8

202.7±4.56

3.5±0.49

3.8±0.12

0.704

130±45.8

0.518

F9

200.1±1.79

3.7±0.24

3.9±0.09

0.601

7±0.58

0.652

F10

200.1±2.67

3.6±0.16

3.7±0.11

0.892

7±2.08

0.551

F11

201±2.62

3.5±0.17

3.9±0.29

0.541

90±30.01

0.429

F12

203±3.46

3.7±0.12

3.9±0.02

0.489

80±17.32

0.468

Results are shown in mean ±SD, (n=3)

Table 7. Wetting time and Water Absorption ratio

Formulation code

Wetting time (sec)

Water absorption ratio (%)

F1

36

75.38

F2

42

151.49

F3

56

25.49

F4

43

30.91

F5

25

126.34

F6

25

94.59

F7

34

40.19

F8

48

79.04

F9

24

22.14

F10

22

26.54

F11

90

97.34

F12

120

103.65

Results are shown in mean ±SD, (n=3)

 

DRUG RELEASE KINETICS

 

Table 8. Zero-order kinetics data of Candesartan fast dissolving tablet of F1-F6

Time (min)

Cumulative % drug released

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

17.21

22.63

13.68

11.52

8.535

6.64

10

26.38

29.13

22.57

21.88

13.18

10.19

15

34.97

47.19

28.44

26.82

19.99

35.01

20

54.13

73.72

49.08

33.48

40.50

65.79

30

66.17

82.26

60.85

53.15

62.95

79.54

45

95.44

98.85

88.56

74.47

84.49

90.20

 

Table 9. Zero-order kinetics data of Candesartan fast dissolving tablet F7-F12

Time (min)

Cumulative % drug released

F7

F8

F9

F10

F11

F12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

4.74

8.53

12.54

20.08

5.16

3.24

10

17.64

14.91

18.32

28.09

11.29

9.77

15

35.61

20.42

34.88

39.58

19.71

17.10

20

43.05

35.09

52.27

48.05

24.18

28.98

30

51.54

50.87

71.56

70.14

43.04

39.19

45

78.24

70.04

85.31

88.30

60.9

56.30

 

The in-vitro dissolution results demonstrated that formulation F2 achieved 98.85% drug release within 45 min, outperforming the other batches. This enhanced dissolution may be attributed to improved drug wettability, reduced crystallinity, and the combined solubilizing effect of Poloxamer 407 and the rapid disintegration facilitated by Crospovidone.

 

 

CONCLUSION

The study confirms that the solid dispersion approach significantly improves the solubility and dissolution performance of Candesartan. Among the developed formulations, F2 containing Crospovidone demonstrated superior performance, showing rapid disintegration, enhanced water uptake, and maximum drug release. All formulations met the acceptable limits for pre- and post-compression quality parameters, indicating formulation reliability. Therefore, Crospovidone-based Candesartan fast-dissolving tablets provide a promising strategy to enhance oral drug delivery and therapeutic efficacy.

REFERENCES

  1. Babu A, Akhtar MS. Overview of formulation & evaluation of fast dissolving tablet: A promising tablet dosage form. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research. 2020 Aug 31;8(3).
  2. Desai SA, Kharade SV, Petkar KC, Kuchekar BS. Orodissolving tablets of promethazine hydrochloride. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2006 Jul;40(3):172.
  3. Nayak BS, Mishra SR, Roy H, Parvathaneni S. Valsartan fast dissolving tablets: Formulation and in vitro characterization. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2018;10(3):182-9.
  4. Husain A, Mitra MS, Bhasin PS. A REVIEWOF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL PROFILE OF CANDESARTAN. Pharmacophore. 2011;2(6-2011):240-50.
  5. Suryadevara V, Nagireddy S, Koppisetti VK, Devanna N. Dissolution rate enhancement of Candesartan and development of fast-dissolving tablets. Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal. 2016;15(3):150–157.
  6. Alam MI, Bajpai M. Solid dispersion technique for improvement of solubility of Candesartan. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2014;8(4):270–276.
  7. AlKhalidi MM, Jawad FJ. Enhancement of aqueous solubility and dissolution rate of etoricoxib by solid dispersion technique. Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Jun 21;29(1):76-87.
  8. Sandeepthi N, Satyanarayana L. Enhancement of solubility and dissolution rate of anti-hypertension drug by solid dispersion technique. Int J Creative Res Thoughts (IJCRT). 2018;6(1):2320–2882.
  9. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 506–510.
  10. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL, editors. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 3rd ed. Lea & Febiger; 1986. p. 293–345.
  11. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib B, Krishnakanth P, Chandira RM, Kumar S. Fast dissolving tablets: An overview. J Chem Pharm Res. 2009;1(1):163–177.
  12. Shah RB, Tawakkul MA, Khan MA. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):250–258.
  13. Gupta V, Gupta B, et al. Evaluation of flow and compressibility characteristics of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;4(8):3253–3259.
  14. Patel P, Chaudhary S, et al. Influence of particle size and shape on flow properties of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm Investig. 2018;8(4):189–194.
  15. Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965;72(2):163–168.
  16. Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall. 1967;3(4):7–13.
  17. Yadav VK, Yadav P, et al. Evaluation parameters of pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;9(9):3600–3606.
  18. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Nagendrakumar D, Kanani KM, Keerthy D. Formulation design and optimization of fast dissolving tablets of clonazepam using 3² full factorial design. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(6):567–572.
  19. Gohel MC, Patel M, Amin A, Agrawal R, Dave R, Bariya N. Formulation design and optimization of mouth dissolving tablets of nimesulide using vacuum drying technique. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5(3):1–6.
  20. RAMU, S., et al. Formulation and evaluation of Valsartan oral dispersible tablets by direct compression method. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 2014, 2.6: 719-733

Reference

  1. Babu A, Akhtar MS. Overview of formulation & evaluation of fast dissolving tablet: A promising tablet dosage form. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research. 2020 Aug 31;8(3).
  2. Desai SA, Kharade SV, Petkar KC, Kuchekar BS. Orodissolving tablets of promethazine hydrochloride. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2006 Jul;40(3):172.
  3. Nayak BS, Mishra SR, Roy H, Parvathaneni S. Valsartan fast dissolving tablets: Formulation and in vitro characterization. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2018;10(3):182-9.
  4. Husain A, Mitra MS, Bhasin PS. A REVIEWOF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL PROFILE OF CANDESARTAN. Pharmacophore. 2011;2(6-2011):240-50.
  5. Suryadevara V, Nagireddy S, Koppisetti VK, Devanna N. Dissolution rate enhancement of Candesartan and development of fast-dissolving tablets. Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal. 2016;15(3):150–157.
  6. Alam MI, Bajpai M. Solid dispersion technique for improvement of solubility of Candesartan. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2014;8(4):270–276.
  7. AlKhalidi MM, Jawad FJ. Enhancement of aqueous solubility and dissolution rate of etoricoxib by solid dispersion technique. Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Jun 21;29(1):76-87.
  8. Sandeepthi N, Satyanarayana L. Enhancement of solubility and dissolution rate of anti-hypertension drug by solid dispersion technique. Int J Creative Res Thoughts (IJCRT). 2018;6(1):2320–2882.
  9. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 506–510.
  10. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL, editors. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 3rd ed. Lea & Febiger; 1986. p. 293–345.
  11. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib B, Krishnakanth P, Chandira RM, Kumar S. Fast dissolving tablets: An overview. J Chem Pharm Res. 2009;1(1):163–177.
  12. Shah RB, Tawakkul MA, Khan MA. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):250–258.
  13. Gupta V, Gupta B, et al. Evaluation of flow and compressibility characteristics of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;4(8):3253–3259.
  14. Patel P, Chaudhary S, et al. Influence of particle size and shape on flow properties of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm Investig. 2018;8(4):189–194.
  15. Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965;72(2):163–168.
  16. Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall. 1967;3(4):7–13.
  17. Yadav VK, Yadav P, et al. Evaluation parameters of pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;9(9):3600–3606.
  18. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Nagendrakumar D, Kanani KM, Keerthy D. Formulation design and optimization of fast dissolving tablets of clonazepam using 3² full factorial design. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(6):567–572.
  19. Gohel MC, Patel M, Amin A, Agrawal R, Dave R, Bariya N. Formulation design and optimization of mouth dissolving tablets of nimesulide using vacuum drying technique. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5(3):1–6.
  20. RAMU, S., et al. Formulation and evaluation of Valsartan oral dispersible tablets by direct compression method. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 2014, 2.6: 719-733

Photo
Dr. D. Ravi Kiran
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical sciences, Sri Venkateswara College of Pharmacy, Chittoor-517127

Dr. D. Ravi Kiran, Preparation and Evaluation of Candesartan Fast Dissolving Tablets for Improved Dissolution Using Solid Dispersion Technique, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 2674-2683, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20624282

More related articles
Evaluation of Bhavana Process as a Novel Approach ...
Tanisha Kale, Kailash Biyani, Hemant Savarkar, Unmesh Joshi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Chlorpheniramine Mal...
Rushika Patil, Sakshi Suryavanshi, Aayesha Abbasi, Shaikh Risal,...
A Rapid and Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method fo...
Snehal Valvi, Dr. Shashikant Barhate, Ritesh Chavhan, Tejas Yeole...
Vonoprazan: A Novel Acid Suppressant in Clinical Practice ...
Tejaswini Kulkarni, K. Pansare, C. Patil, Komal Gangurde...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Gel for Management of Mouth Ulcer ...
Kavita Sharma, Rushikesh Narode, Abhijeet Rekhate...
Related Articles
A Prospective Observational Study on Pregnancy-Related Morbidities and the Role ...
K. Jennifer, Dr. J. N. Suresh Kumar , Sk. Nagul Meeravali, Sk. Nusrath Tasleem, M. A Sana, A. Bhavy...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Syrup for Diabetes and Obesity...
Chaitanya Ravan, Dr. Y. R Girbane, Ayodhya Pardhe, Gajanan Mhaske, Aniket Baldode, Shubhekshan Chemt...
Impact of Oxycodone Hydrochloride on Cognitive Performance in Wistar Rats: Behav...
Archange Michel Emmanuel Mboungou Malonga, Alice Nzambi Passi Spouse Matete Mounoi, Syrlie Marina Os...
Evaluation of Bhavana Process as a Novel Approach for Improving Solubility of Po...
Tanisha Kale, Kailash Biyani, Hemant Savarkar, Unmesh Joshi...
More related articles
Evaluation of Bhavana Process as a Novel Approach for Improving Solubility of Po...
Tanisha Kale, Kailash Biyani, Hemant Savarkar, Unmesh Joshi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Chlorpheniramine Maleate-Loaded Orodispersible Fil...
Rushika Patil, Sakshi Suryavanshi, Aayesha Abbasi, Shaikh Risal, Atul Mahajan...
A Rapid and Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Quantification of Lurasidone...
Snehal Valvi, Dr. Shashikant Barhate, Ritesh Chavhan, Tejas Yeole, Mahesh Wagh, Paresh Chaudhari, Ha...
Evaluation of Bhavana Process as a Novel Approach for Improving Solubility of Po...
Tanisha Kale, Kailash Biyani, Hemant Savarkar, Unmesh Joshi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Chlorpheniramine Maleate-Loaded Orodispersible Fil...
Rushika Patil, Sakshi Suryavanshi, Aayesha Abbasi, Shaikh Risal, Atul Mahajan...
A Rapid and Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Quantification of Lurasidone...
Snehal Valvi, Dr. Shashikant Barhate, Ritesh Chavhan, Tejas Yeole, Mahesh Wagh, Paresh Chaudhari, Ha...