View Article

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop and optimize a Lornoxicam topical gel using an in-silico skin permeation assessment integrated with a Quality by Design (QbD) approach. Lornoxicam is a potent oxicam-class non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and topical delivery was investigated as a formulation strategy for localized administration. Preformulation studies included organoleptic evaluation, solubility assessment and melting-point determination. SwissADME was used to predict physicochemical and skin-permeation-related descriptors before formulation development. A Carbopol 940-based gel containing Lornoxicam was prepared by dispersion. QbD principles were applied to define the Quality Target Product Profile and Critical Quality Attributes, followed by selection of Carbopol 940, propylene glycol, ethanol and triethanolamine as formulation variables. A Taguchi L9 orthogonal array was used to study their effects on pH, spreadability and viscosity, and the data were analyzed using Design-Expert® software and ANOVA. Lornoxicam showed a melting range of 221–225°C, a ?max of 376 nm in methanol, low aqueous solubility and better solubility in organic solvents. SwissADME predicted a molecular weight of 371.82 g/mol, consensus Log P of 1.59 and skin permeability coefficient (Log Kp) of ?7.07 cm/s. The optimized formulation contained 0.5% w/w Carbopol 940, 5% w/w propylene glycol, 5% w/w ethanol and 0.25% w/w triethanolamine. Predicted responses were pH 5.86, spreadability 28.58 g·cm/s and viscosity 20.18 Pa·s, while experimental values were 5.84, 28.41 g·cm/s and 20.05 Pa·s, respectively. The optimized gel showed acceptable homogeneity, smoothness and extrudability and remained physically stable during three months of accelerated storage at 40 ± 2°C/75 ± 5% RH. The study demonstrates the usefulness of combining in-silico permeation prediction with QbD-based formulation optimization for systematic development of Lornoxicam topical gel.

Keywords

Lornoxicam; topical gel; Quality by Design; SwissADME; Taguchi design; Carbopol 940

Introduction

× Popup Image

Pain and inflammation are common clinical problems for which non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used. Lornoxicam is an oxicam derivative with potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity. Although oral administration is effective, conventional systemic NSAID therapy may be associated with gastrointestinal and other systemic adverse effects, particularly during repeated use. Topical delivery offers an alternative route for localized treatment by placing the drug at or near the site of application while potentially reducing systemic exposure.

The stratum corneum is the principal barrier to dermal drug transport. Drug molecular size, lipophilicity, polarity, solubility and formulation composition all influence passive permeation. Lornoxicam has physicochemical characteristics that warrant formulation-assisted delivery, and permeation enhancers such as ethanol and propylene glycol may improve drug solubilization and transport through the skin.

Topical gels are attractive semisolid dosage forms because they are easy to apply, generally non-greasy, readily spreadable and capable of providing localized drug release. Carbopol polymers are commonly used to form clear or translucent gels with controllable viscosity. However, polymer concentration, solvent level and neutralization can substantially affect gel pH, rheology and spreadability.

Quality by Design (QbD) provides a science- and risk-based framework for pharmaceutical development. It begins with a Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP), identifies Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), links them to Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) and Critical Process Parameters (CPPs), and uses experimental design to understand formulation-variable effects. In the present work, an in-silico permeation assessment was used before formulation development and was integrated with QbD-based optimization of a Lornoxicam topical gel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Lornoxicam (pharmaceutical reference standard; MedChemExpress, USA) was used as the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Carbopol 940, triethanolamine, ethanol, propylene glycol, methyl paraben and propyl paraben were used as formulation excipients. Purified water and analytical-reagent-grade solvents and reagents were used for analytical and formulation studies.

In-Silico Permeation Study

The two-dimensional structure of Lornoxicam was obtained from PubChem (CID 54676228), and the corresponding SMILES string was entered into the SwissADME web server. Molecular weight, consensus Log P, topological polar surface area (TPSA), hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, ESOL solubility, gastrointestinal absorption, bioavailability score, Lipinski compliance and predicted skin permeability coefficient (Log Kp) were recorded. The BOILED-Egg model and bioavailability radar were also examined. The analysis was performed before formulation development to provide preliminary evidence regarding the molecule's suitability for topical delivery.

Preformulation Studies

Organoleptic characteristics were assessed by visual inspection of color, appearance, texture and odor. Solubility was assessed in distilled water, methanol, ethanol, propylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide using an equilibrium method. Excess drug was equilibrated in each solvent at 25 ± 2°C for 24 h, filtered and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 376 nm. Measurements were performed in triplicate. Melting point was determined by the capillary method.

Preparation of Lornoxicam Gel

Lornoxicam gel was prepared by the dispersion method using Carbopol 940. Carbopol 940 was gradually dispersed in approximately 70% of the required purified water with stirring at 500 rpm, followed by hydration for 24 h. Lornoxicam was dissolved in ethanol and propylene glycol. Methyl paraben and propyl paraben were dissolved in a small quantity of ethanol with gentle heating and incorporated into the drug solution. The drug solution was added slowly to the hydrated polymer with continuous stirring, followed by addition of the remaining water. Triethanolamine was added dropwise to adjust the pH to approximately 5.5–6.5 and to develop the gel structure. The gel was homogenized, allowed to deaerate and filled into suitable containers.

TABLE 1. COMPOSITION OF THE OPTIMIZED LORNOXICAM TOPICAL GEL

Ingredient

Optimized level (% w/w)

Lornoxicam

0.20

Carbopol 940

0.50

Propylene glycol

5.00

Ethanol

5.00

Triethanolamine

0.25

Methyl paraben

0.15

Propyl paraben

0.05

Purified water

q.s. to 100

QbD-Based Formulation Development

The QTPP was defined with emphasis on a smooth topical gel, skin-compatible pH, adequate viscosity, maximum practical spreadability, homogeneity, good extrudability and physical stability. Based on literature and preliminary trials, Carbopol 940 concentration (A), propylene glycol concentration (B), ethanol concentration (C) and triethanolamine concentration (D) were selected as formulation variables.

TABLE 2. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES AND EXPERIMENTAL LEVELS

Factor

Low (−1)

Middle (0)

High (+1)

Carbopol 940 (% w/w)

0.5

1.0

1.5

Propylene glycol (% w/w)

5

10

15

Ethanol (% w/w)

5

10

15

Triethanolamine (% w/w)

0.25

0.50

0.75

A Taguchi L9 orthogonal array was generated in Design-Expert® Version 13. Nine experimental formulations were prepared. The selected responses were pH, spreadability and viscosity. The optimization targets were a skin-compatible pH of 5.5–6.5, maximum spreadability and an appropriate viscosity. ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the models and formulation factors, followed by numerical optimization using a desirability function.

Evaluation Of Gel

Homogeneity, color, transparency, consistency and phase separation were evaluated visually. Grittiness was assessed by rubbing a small amount of gel between the fingertips. Extrudability was assessed from collapsible aluminum tubes and graded according to ease of extrusion. pH was measured using a calibrated digital pH meter after dispersing approximately 1 g of gel in 10 mL of distilled water. Viscosity was measured with a Brookfield DV-E viscometer using spindle No. 64 at 10 rpm and 25 ± 2°C. Spreadability was determined by the parallel-slide method and calculated as S = ML/T, where M is the weight attached to the upper slide, L is the length of the slide and T is the time required for separation.

Stability Study

The optimized formulation was subjected to accelerated stability testing according to ICH Q1A(R2). Samples were stored at 40 ± 2°C/75 ± 5% relative humidity for three months and evaluated at 0, 1, 2 and 3 months for appearance, color, homogeneity, pH, spreadability, viscosity and extrudability.

RESULTS

In-Silico Permeation and Physicochemical Prediction

SwissADME predicted a molecular weight of 371.82 g/mol and a consensus Log P of 1.59. The predicted skin permeability coefficient was −7.07 cm/s. TPSA was 136.22 Ų, with five hydrogen-bond acceptors and two hydrogen-bond donors. Lipinski's Rule of Five showed no violations and the predicted bioavailability score was 0.56. The predicted Log Kp indicated that passive skin permeation may be limited, supporting the inclusion of formulation-assisted permeation enhancers.

TABLE 3. SWISSADME-PREDICTED PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND PERMEATION PARAMETERS OF LORNOXICAM

Parameter

Predicted value

Molecular formula

C13H10ClN3O4S2

Molecular weight

371.82 g/mol

Consensus Log P

1.59

TPSA

136.22 Ų

H-bond acceptors

5

H-bond donors

2

Rotatable bonds

3

Skin permeability (Log Kp)

−7.07 cm/s

ESOL Log S

−3.63

GI absorption

High

BBB permeability

No

P-gp substrate

No

Lipinski violations

0

Bioavailability score

0.56

Preformulation Findings

Lornoxicam appeared as a light-yellow to yellow, odorless crystalline fine powder. The drug was slightly soluble in distilled water, freely soluble in methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide, soluble in ethanol and moderately soluble in propylene glycol. The observed melting range was 221–225°C. These findings were consistent with the expected physicochemical characteristics and supported further formulation development.

TABLE 4. SOLUBILITY PROFILE OF LORNOXICAM

Solvent

Solubility observation

Distilled water

Slightly soluble

Methanol

Freely soluble

Ethanol

Soluble

Propylene glycol

Moderately soluble

DMSO

Freely soluble

Optimization By Taguchi L9 Design

The nine experimental batches produced pH values from 5.78 to 7.12, spreadability values from 16.74 to 30.15 g·cm/s and viscosity values from 18.76 to 43.28 Pa·s. Increasing Carbopol concentration generally increased viscosity and reduced spreadability. Triethanolamine had a pronounced effect on pH because of its neutralizing action on Carbopol.

TABLE 5. EXPERIMENTAL RESPONSES OF THE TAGUCHI L9 BATCHES

Run

Carbopol (%)

PG (%)

Ethanol (%)

TEA (%)

pH

Spreadability (g·cm/s)

Viscosity (Pa·s)

G1

0.75

5

10

0.75

6.92

18.45

34.82

G2

0.5

5

5

0.25

5.78

26.84

18.76

G3

0.75

15

5

0.5

6.41

22.18

29.65

G4

0.5

10

10

0.5

6.32

28.76

20.41

G5

1.0

5

15

0.5

6.36

17.42

41.53

G6

0.75

10

15

0.25

5.94

23.87

27.34

G7

1.0

15

10

0.25

5.86

19.56

38.92

G8

1.0

10

5

0.75

7.05

16.74

43.28

G9

0.5

15

15

0.75

7.12

30.15

21.36

Statistical Analysis And Model Validation

The pH model was statistically significant (F = 165.48, p < 0.0001), with triethanolamine identified as the significant factor. The spreadability model was significant (F = 21.05, p = 0.0019), with Carbopol 940 as the significant factor. The viscosity model was also significant (F = 47.07, p = 0.0002), again showing a significant contribution from Carbopol 940.

TABLE 6. ANOVA AND MODEL-FIT SUMMARY

Response

Significant factor

Model F-value

p-value

R²

Adjusted R²

Predicted R²

pH

Triethanolamine

165.48

<0.0001

0.9822

0.9763

0.9599

Spreadability

Carbopol 940

21.05

0.0019

0.8753

0.8337

0.7193

Viscosity

Carbopol 940

47.07

0.0002

0.9401

0.9201

0.8652

Optimization And Confirmation

Numerical optimization generated solutions with a desirability value of 1.000. The selected optimized formulation contained 0.5% Carbopol 940, 5% propylene glycol, 5% ethanol and 0.25% triethanolamine. The predicted and experimentally observed responses were closely comparable, indicating satisfactory predictive performance of the optimization models.

TABLE 7. PREDICTED AND OBSERVED RESPONSES OF THE OPTIMIZED FORMULATION

Response

Predicted

Observed

pH

5.86

5.84

Spreadability (g·cm/s)

28.58

28.41

Viscosity (Pa·s)

20.18

20.05

Evaluation and Stability

The optimized gel was smooth, homogeneous and free from visible aggregates and phase separation. No appreciable grittiness was observed, and the formulation was extruded smoothly from the collapsible tube. During accelerated storage at 40 ± 2°C/75 ± 5% RH for three months, no significant visual change, phase separation, liquefaction or precipitation was reported. The measured pH, spreadability and viscosity remained within acceptable ranges over the study period.

DISCUSSION

The in-silico assessment provided an early estimate of the molecular characteristics relevant to dermal delivery. Lornoxicam showed a molecular weight below the commonly used 500 Da reference threshold and moderate lipophilicity, which can favor partitioning into the lipid-rich stratum corneum. At the same time, the relatively high TPSA and the predicted Log Kp of −7.07 cm/s indicate that passive permeation may be limited. Thus, the computational findings support the need for formulation strategies rather than implying that topical delivery will necessarily produce a specific in vivo therapeutic exposure.

The preformulation results supported the use of ethanol and propylene glycol in the gel. Their solvent and co-solvent properties can improve drug solubilization, while both can contribute to dermal permeation enhancement. Carbopol 940 provided the polymeric network required for gel formation. The optimization results demonstrated the expected formulation relationships: higher polymer concentration increased viscosity and reduced spreadability, whereas triethanolamine strongly influenced pH through neutralization of Carbopol.

The QbD strategy reduced the number of experimental batches needed to examine four formulation variables and linked formulation composition to measurable CQAs. The significant ANOVA results and high coefficients of determination indicate that the selected models described the observed response variation within the studied design space. The close agreement between predicted and observed responses in the confirmation experiment further supports the selected formulation conditions.

The optimized formulation showed acceptable physical characteristics and maintained its properties during the three-month accelerated study. Nevertheless, the present work was primarily a formulation-development and computational study. The predicted skin permeability should be interpreted as a theoretical estimate, and additional experimental permeation, drug-content, release, skin-retention, irritation and pharmacodynamic studies would be required to establish clinical performance.

CONCLUSION

A Lornoxicam topical gel was successfully developed using an integrated in-silico and QbD-based approach. SwissADME analysis provided preliminary evidence regarding molecular properties relevant to skin delivery and supported the use of permeation-enhancing excipients. The Taguchi L9 design efficiently identified the effects of Carbopol 940 and triethanolamine on viscosity/spreadability and pH, respectively. The optimized formulation containing 0.5% Carbopol 940, 5% propylene glycol, 5% ethanol and 0.25% triethanolamine showed predicted and experimental responses in close agreement and acceptable physical stability under accelerated conditions. The findings demonstrate a systematic formulation-development strategy for Lornoxicam topical gel, while further experimental skin-permeation and biological studies are warranted before therapeutic conclusions are drawn.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors acknowledge Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for providing laboratory facilities and academic support for this research work.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.

REFERENCES

  1. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161(9):1976-1982.
  2. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009;139(2):267-284.
  3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-2038.
  4. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759.
  5. Vane JR, Botting RM. Mechanism of action of anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Tissue React. 1998;20(1):3-15.
  6. Wallace JL. Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself? Physiol Rev. 2008;88(4):1547-1565.
  7. Whelton A. Nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: physiologic foundations and clinical implications. Am J Med. 1999;106(5):13S-24S.
  8. Balfour JA, Fitton A. Lornoxicam: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of painful and inflammatory conditions. Drugs. 1996;51(4):639-657.
  9. Pruss TP, Stroissnig H, Radhofer-Welte S, Wendtlandt W, Mehdi N. Overview of the pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics and animal safety assessment of lornoxicam. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72(Suppl 1):S18-S21.
  10. Hitzenberger G, Radhofer-Welte S. Clinical pharmacokinetics of lornoxicam. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990;19(Suppl 1):18-21.
  11. Benson HAE, Watkinson AC. Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Principles and Practice. Wiley; 2012.
  12. Barry BW. Drug delivery routes in skin: a novel approach. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(Suppl):S31-S40.
  13. Hadgraft J, Lane ME. Skin permeation: the years of enlightenment. Int J Pharm. 2016;514(1):2-11.
  14. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(Suppl):128-137.
  15. Panwar AS, Upadhyay N, Bairagi M, Gujar S, Darwhekar GN, Jain DK. Emulgel: a review. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;1(3):333-343.
  16. Bharadwaj S, Gupta GD, Sharma VK. Topical gel: a novel approach for drug delivery. J Chem Biol Phys Sci. 2012;2(2):856-866.
  17. Ahmed Un Nabi SA, Sheraz MA, Ahmed S, Mustaan N, Ahmad I. Pharmaceutical gels: a review. Rads J Pharm Allied Health Sci. 2016;4(1):40-48.
  18. Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm Res. 2008;25(4):781-791.
  19. International Council for Harmonisation. Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2009.
  20. International Council for Harmonisation. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2003.
  21. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42717.
  22. Al-Suwayeh SA, Taha EI, Al-Qahtani FM, Ahmed MO, Badran MM. Evaluation of skin permeation and analgesic activity effects of Carbopol lornoxicam topical gels containing penetration enhancer. Sci World J. 2014;2014:127495.
  23. Kumbhar D, Wavikar P, Vavia P. Niosomal gel of lornoxicam for topical delivery: in vitro assessment and pharmacodynamic activity. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(3):1072-1082.
  24. Dasgupta S, Ghosh SK, Ray S, Kaurav SS, Mazumder B. In vitro and in vivo studies on lornoxicam loaded nanoemulsion gels for topical application. Curr Drug Deliv. 2014;11(1).
  25. Shawky SM, Khalifa MKA, Eassa HA. Lornoxicam-loaded nanosponges for topical delivery. Int J Appl Pharm. 2020;12(6).
  26. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, editors. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 9th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2021.
  27. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
  28. Allen LV, Popovich NG, Ansel HC. Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems. 12th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
  29. Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy. 4th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2006.
  30. Sinko PJ, Singh Y. Martin's Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

Reference

  1. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161(9):1976-1982.
  2. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009;139(2):267-284.
  3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-2038.
  4. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759.
  5. Vane JR, Botting RM. Mechanism of action of anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Tissue React. 1998;20(1):3-15.
  6. Wallace JL. Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself? Physiol Rev. 2008;88(4):1547-1565.
  7. Whelton A. Nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: physiologic foundations and clinical implications. Am J Med. 1999;106(5):13S-24S.
  8. Balfour JA, Fitton A. Lornoxicam: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of painful and inflammatory conditions. Drugs. 1996;51(4):639-657.
  9. Pruss TP, Stroissnig H, Radhofer-Welte S, Wendtlandt W, Mehdi N. Overview of the pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics and animal safety assessment of lornoxicam. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72(Suppl 1):S18-S21.
  10. Hitzenberger G, Radhofer-Welte S. Clinical pharmacokinetics of lornoxicam. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990;19(Suppl 1):18-21.
  11. Benson HAE, Watkinson AC. Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Principles and Practice. Wiley; 2012.
  12. Barry BW. Drug delivery routes in skin: a novel approach. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(Suppl):S31-S40.
  13. Hadgraft J, Lane ME. Skin permeation: the years of enlightenment. Int J Pharm. 2016;514(1):2-11.
  14. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(Suppl):128-137.
  15. Panwar AS, Upadhyay N, Bairagi M, Gujar S, Darwhekar GN, Jain DK. Emulgel: a review. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;1(3):333-343.
  16. Bharadwaj S, Gupta GD, Sharma VK. Topical gel: a novel approach for drug delivery. J Chem Biol Phys Sci. 2012;2(2):856-866.
  17. Ahmed Un Nabi SA, Sheraz MA, Ahmed S, Mustaan N, Ahmad I. Pharmaceutical gels: a review. Rads J Pharm Allied Health Sci. 2016;4(1):40-48.
  18. Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm Res. 2008;25(4):781-791.
  19. International Council for Harmonisation. Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2009.
  20. International Council for Harmonisation. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2003.
  21. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42717.
  22. Al-Suwayeh SA, Taha EI, Al-Qahtani FM, Ahmed MO, Badran MM. Evaluation of skin permeation and analgesic activity effects of Carbopol lornoxicam topical gels containing penetration enhancer. Sci World J. 2014;2014:127495.
  23. Kumbhar D, Wavikar P, Vavia P. Niosomal gel of lornoxicam for topical delivery: in vitro assessment and pharmacodynamic activity. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(3):1072-1082.
  24. Dasgupta S, Ghosh SK, Ray S, Kaurav SS, Mazumder B. In vitro and in vivo studies on lornoxicam loaded nanoemulsion gels for topical application. Curr Drug Deliv. 2014;11(1).
  25. Shawky SM, Khalifa MKA, Eassa HA. Lornoxicam-loaded nanosponges for topical delivery. Int J Appl Pharm. 2020;12(6).
  26. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, editors. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 9th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2021.
  27. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
  28. Allen LV, Popovich NG, Ansel HC. Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems. 12th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
  29. Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy. 4th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2006.
  30. Sinko PJ, Singh Y. Martin's Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

Photo
Rutuja Salunke
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Photo
S. S. Angadi
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Reshma Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Vadana Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Rutuja Salunke, S. S. Angadi, Reshma Patil, Vadana Patil, QbD-Based Development of Lornoxicam Topical Gel Supported by In-Silico Permeation Study, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 10, 891-897. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23192181

More related articles
Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Eval...
Divya Devkar, Akshata Pagar, Dr Kiran Dhamak...
Exploring The Therapeutic Potential of Solanum Nig...
Pooja, Keerthikaran. D, Mohamed Shamnad K, Dr. A. Kavidha, Bharad...
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Development...
Veluthurla Venkata Sai Neeraj , Dr. T. Thangabalan, Santosh Aruna...
Design, Formulation and Evaluation of a Pediatric-Friendly Bilayer Fast Dissolvi...
Ganesh Vitukade, Bhagyshree Jagtap, Sakshi Walunj, Shraddha Zarekar...
Thiophene–Benzimidazole Conjugates as Anticancer Agents: A Mechanism-Based Rev...
Fathima C O, Hiba Abdul Razak, Megha Santhosh M, Alagha K, Amrutha P. Anil, Artha Rajagopal K, Jibin...
Related Articles
Advances in Preclinical HIV Vaccine Development: Strategies, Evidence, and Futur...
Jagannadham Nuthana Yaswanth, Routhu Pratyusha, Eswar Kumar Kilari, Chinni Krishna Khandavalli, Push...
Contemporary Pharmacotherapy of Myocardial Infarction: Recent Advances, Precisio...
G. Ramya Balaprabha, R. Nivedita, Nunemunthala Srija, Sneha...
More related articles
Exploring The Therapeutic Potential of Solanum Nigrum...
Pooja, Keerthikaran. D, Mohamed Shamnad K, Dr. A. Kavidha, Bharadhan Boss...
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Development...
Veluthurla Venkata Sai Neeraj , Dr. T. Thangabalan, Santosh Aruna Mamidi, Kondameeda Mallikarjuna , ...
Exploring The Therapeutic Potential of Solanum Nigrum...
Pooja, Keerthikaran. D, Mohamed Shamnad K, Dr. A. Kavidha, Bharadhan Boss...
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Development...
Veluthurla Venkata Sai Neeraj , Dr. T. Thangabalan, Santosh Aruna Mamidi, Kondameeda Mallikarjuna , ...