View Article

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance plays a key role in ensuring the safe and effective use of medicines by identifying and minimizing adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Traditionally, pharmacovigilance systems relied mainly on spontaneous reporting, which often resulted in underreporting and delayed detection of safety concerns.In recent years, pharmacovigilance has evolved with the integration of modern technologies and improved monitoring approaches. This review summarizes recent developments in pharmacovigilance reported between 2019 and 2025. Key areas include the application of artificial intelligence for early signal detection, the use of real-world data to understand drug safety in routine clinical settings, and digital platforms that facilitate efficient reporting. Increased patient involvement and global harmonization efforts have further strengthened pharmacovigilance systems.Despite these advancements, challenges such as data privacy concerns, variability in reporting practices, and limitations in infrastructure remain. Overall, pharmacovigilance is gradually shifting toward a more proactive, data-driven, and patient-centered approach to drug safety monitoring.

Keywords

Pharmacovigilance, Adverse Drug Reactions, Drug Safety, Artificial Intelligence, Real-World Data

Introduction

× Popup Image

Pharmacovigilance refers to the science and activities related to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects associated with medicinal products (1,2). With the increasing use of pharmaceuticals worldwide, monitoring drug safety has become a major public health priority.

Earlier pharmacovigilance systems were largely based on spontaneous reporting, which had several limitations including underreporting, incomplete data, and delays in identifying risks (3,4,23). As a result, certain adverse effects were recognized only after extensive clinical use.

Over time, the field has moved toward more proactive and systematic approaches. Advances in data science, availability of large healthcare datasets, and improvements in regulatory frameworks have significantly contributed to this transition. Modern pharmacovigilance now focuses on early signal detection, continuous monitoring, and prevention of drug-related problems.

This review aims to provide an overview of recent advancements in pharmacovigilance and their role in improving drug safety monitoring systems.

The overall workflow of pharmacovigilance, from adverse drug reaction reporting to regulatory action, is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: General process of pharmacovigilance from adverse drug reaction reporting to regulatory action and continuous monitoring.

 

 

 

 

2. RECENT ADVANCEMENTS IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE

2.1 Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important tool in pharmacovigilance by enabling the analysis of large datasets and facilitating early detection of safety signals (6,7). Machine learning techniques can identify patterns in adverse drug reaction data and support predictive modeling.

Recent evidence from a systematic review has highlighted the growing role of AI in improving data analysis and signal detection in pharmacovigilance, although challenges related to data quality and regulatory acceptance remain (41).

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: Role of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance from data collection and processing to signal detection, risk assessment, and decision making.

 

2.2 Automation

Automation has improved efficiency in pharmacovigilance activities such as case processing and report generation (8). It reduces manual workload and enhances consistency, although implementation may require adequate infrastructure and technical expertise.

2.3 Real-World Data

Real-world data obtained from electronic health records and clinical databases provides insights into drug safety under routine clinical conditions (10). It helps identify long-term and rare adverse effects that may not be observed during clinical trials.

2.4 Digital Pharmacovigilance

Digital tools, including mobile applications and online reporting systems, have improved the reporting and monitoring of adverse drug reactions (12,13). These platforms support faster communication and real-time data collection, although ensuring data accuracy remains essential.

2.5 Patient Participation

Increased involvement of patients in reporting adverse drug reactions has contributed valuable real-world insights into pharmacovigilance systems (14). However, variability in report quality can sometimes be a limitation.

2.6 Global Harmonization

Efforts toward global harmonization aim to standardize pharmacovigilance practices across different regions, improving consistency and data sharing (15).

2.7 Blockchain Technology

Blockchain technology offers a secure and transparent approach for storing pharmacovigilance data, ensuring data integrity and reducing the risk of unauthorized access (16).

2.8 Advanced Data Tools

Advanced computational tools assist in data analysis, literature review, and signal detection, improving overall efficiency in pharmacovigilance research (19).

2.9 Orphan Drug Monitoring

Pharmacovigilance plays a crucial role in monitoring orphan drugs, which often have limited safety data prior to approval (20).

2.10 Outsourcing

Outsourcing pharmacovigilance activities allows pharmaceutical companies to manage workload effectively and access specialized expertise (9), although it may raise concerns regarding data confidentiality.

 

TABLE 1: Key Advancements in Pharmacovigilance

Advancement

Application

Advantage

Limitation

Artificial Intelligence

Signal detection

Early identification

Data dependency

Automation

Case processing

Reduces workload

Cost

Real-World Data

Clinical data

Real-life insights

Variability

Digital PV

Reporting

Faster communication

Accuracy issues

Blockchain

Data storage

Security

Limited adoption

 

DISCUSSION

Recent developments in pharmacovigilance have significantly improved the ability to detect and manage drug safety issues. Compared to traditional approaches, modern systems are more data-driven and focus on early identification of potential risks.

Artificial intelligence has shown strong potential in enhancing signal detection and data analysis. A recent systematic review has further emphasized its importance in predictive modeling and large-scale data processing, although challenges related to data quality and regulatory frameworks still need to be addressed (41).

The use of real-world data has improved understanding of drug safety in everyday clinical practice. Digital reporting tools have made it easier for both healthcare professionals and patients to report adverse events, contributing to more efficient data collection.

At the same time, more active involvement of patients, along with efforts to standardize practices at a global level, has helped make pharmacovigilance systems more transparent and consistent.

Despite these advancements, challenges such as data privacy concerns, underreporting, and limitations in infrastructure continue to affect pharmacovigilance systems. Addressing these issues will be important for further strengthening drug safety monitoring.

 

TABLE 2: Challenges in Pharmacovigilance

Challenge

Impact

Solution

Data privacy

Limits data sharing

Strong regulations

Underreporting

Delayed detection

Awareness programs

Implementation issues

Technology barriers

Infrastructure improvement

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

Pharmacovigilance has evolved considerably with the integration of modern technologies and improved monitoring systems. These advancements have enhanced the efficiency and reliability of drug safety evaluation. Continued progress, along with better awareness and global collaboration, will further strengthen pharmacovigilance systems and improve patient safety.

REFERENCES

  1. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.
  2. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19.
  3. Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.
  4. Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.
  5. Härmark L, van Grootheest AC. Pharmacovigilance: methods and future perspectives. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64(8):743–52.
  6. Arora D, Sharma S, Mehta N. Role of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance. J Pharmacovigil. 2021;9(2):101–10.
  7. Lee J, Kim H. Artificial intelligence in drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(6):456–70.
  8. Singh A, Gupta R. Automation in pharmacovigilance: current trends. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2020;64(4):78–85.
  9. Verma M, Patel K. Outsourcing in pharmacovigilance: benefits and challenges. Int J Pharm Pract. 2021;29(3):200–10.
  10. Sharma R, Kumar S. Real-world evidence in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2022;45:987–1001.
  11. Coloma PM, Trifirò G, Schuemie MJ, et al. Electronic healthcare databases for active drug safety surveillance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(3):183–97.
  12. Patel K, Mehta N. Digital pharmacovigilance: modern approaches. Pharm Technol. 2021;45(6):55–63.
  13. Sarker A, Ginn R, Nikfarjam A, et al. Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:202–12.
  14. Gupta P, Singh R. Patient-centered drug safety monitoring. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020;42:1125–34.
  15. Tregunno P, Fink DB, Fernandez-Fernandez C, et al. Strengthening global pharmacovigilance systems. Drug Saf. 2014;37(7):503–10.
  16. Mehta N, Arora D. Blockchain technology in pharmacovigilance. J Pharm Innov. 2023;18:245–56.
  17. Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, Shah NH, et al. Data mining for adverse drug events. Drug Saf. 2012;35(9):777–95.
  18. Koutkias VG, Jaulent MC. Computational methods for pharmacovigilance. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015;122(2):173–88.
  19. Kumar S, Sharma R. Emerging trends in pharmacovigilance. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17:45–58.
  20. Orphan drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:1–10
  21. Banerjee AK, Zomerdijk IM, Wooder S, et al. Pharmacovigilance in clinical practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:957–65.
  22. Alomar MJ. Factors affecting adverse drug reactions. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(2):83–94.
  23. Golder S, Loke YK. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2016;352:i157.
  24. Dal Pan GJ. Postmarketing drug safety surveillance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(3):317–20.
  25. Bate A, Evans SJ. Quantitative signal detection methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):427–36.
  26. Trifirò G, Coloma PM. Combining healthcare databases for safety monitoring. Drug Saf. 2018;41(1):1–5.
  27. World Health Organization. Pharmacovigilance: ensuring the safe use of medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  28. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The importance of pharmacovigilance. UMC; 2021.
  29. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices. EMA; 2022.
  30. US Food and Drug Administration. Pharmacovigilance guidance. FDA; 2022.
  31. Brown EG, Wood L. MedDRA and pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2019;42:123–34.
  32. Pharmacovigilance studies: global perspective. Front Pharmacol. 2021.
  33. Precedence Research. Pharmacovigilance market analysis. 2022.
  34. ArXiv. Artificial intelligence models in pharmacovigilance. 2022.
  35. Lee J. AI-driven drug safety monitoring. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023.
  36. Singh R. Advances in ADR reporting systems. Int J Pharm Sci. 2020.
  37. Patel N. Digital transformation in pharmacovigilance. Pharm Rev. 2021.
  38. Gupta A. Role of big data in pharmacovigilance. Drug Res. 2022.
  39. Sharma P. Global pharmacovigilance frameworks. Health Policy. 2021.
  40. Mehta K. Emerging technologies in drug safety. J Clin Pharm. 2023.
  41. Patil HG, Khairnar VS. Impact of AI on pharmacovigilance: a systematic review. Int J Res Pharm Allied Sci. 2025;4(5):26–35

Reference

  1. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.
  2. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19.
  3. Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.
  4. Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.
  5. Härmark L, van Grootheest AC. Pharmacovigilance: methods and future perspectives. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64(8):743–52.
  6. Arora D, Sharma S, Mehta N. Role of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance. J Pharmacovigil. 2021;9(2):101–10.
  7. Lee J, Kim H. Artificial intelligence in drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(6):456–70.
  8. Singh A, Gupta R. Automation in pharmacovigilance: current trends. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2020;64(4):78–85.
  9. Verma M, Patel K. Outsourcing in pharmacovigilance: benefits and challenges. Int J Pharm Pract. 2021;29(3):200–10.
  10. Sharma R, Kumar S. Real-world evidence in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2022;45:987–1001.
  11. Coloma PM, Trifirò G, Schuemie MJ, et al. Electronic healthcare databases for active drug safety surveillance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(3):183–97.
  12. Patel K, Mehta N. Digital pharmacovigilance: modern approaches. Pharm Technol. 2021;45(6):55–63.
  13. Sarker A, Ginn R, Nikfarjam A, et al. Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:202–12.
  14. Gupta P, Singh R. Patient-centered drug safety monitoring. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020;42:1125–34.
  15. Tregunno P, Fink DB, Fernandez-Fernandez C, et al. Strengthening global pharmacovigilance systems. Drug Saf. 2014;37(7):503–10.
  16. Mehta N, Arora D. Blockchain technology in pharmacovigilance. J Pharm Innov. 2023;18:245–56.
  17. Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, Shah NH, et al. Data mining for adverse drug events. Drug Saf. 2012;35(9):777–95.
  18. Koutkias VG, Jaulent MC. Computational methods for pharmacovigilance. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015;122(2):173–88.
  19. Kumar S, Sharma R. Emerging trends in pharmacovigilance. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17:45–58.
  20. Orphan drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:1–10
  21. Banerjee AK, Zomerdijk IM, Wooder S, et al. Pharmacovigilance in clinical practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:957–65.
  22. Alomar MJ. Factors affecting adverse drug reactions. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(2):83–94.
  23. Golder S, Loke YK. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2016;352:i157.
  24. Dal Pan GJ. Postmarketing drug safety surveillance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(3):317–20.
  25. Bate A, Evans SJ. Quantitative signal detection methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):427–36.
  26. Trifirò G, Coloma PM. Combining healthcare databases for safety monitoring. Drug Saf. 2018;41(1):1–5.
  27. World Health Organization. Pharmacovigilance: ensuring the safe use of medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  28. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The importance of pharmacovigilance. UMC; 2021.
  29. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices. EMA; 2022.
  30. US Food and Drug Administration. Pharmacovigilance guidance. FDA; 2022.
  31. Brown EG, Wood L. MedDRA and pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2019;42:123–34.
  32. Pharmacovigilance studies: global perspective. Front Pharmacol. 2021.
  33. Precedence Research. Pharmacovigilance market analysis. 2022.
  34. ArXiv. Artificial intelligence models in pharmacovigilance. 2022.
  35. Lee J. AI-driven drug safety monitoring. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023.
  36. Singh R. Advances in ADR reporting systems. Int J Pharm Sci. 2020.
  37. Patel N. Digital transformation in pharmacovigilance. Pharm Rev. 2021.
  38. Gupta A. Role of big data in pharmacovigilance. Drug Res. 2022.
  39. Sharma P. Global pharmacovigilance frameworks. Health Policy. 2021.
  40. Mehta K. Emerging technologies in drug safety. J Clin Pharm. 2023.
  41. Patil HG, Khairnar VS. Impact of AI on pharmacovigilance: a systematic review. Int J Res Pharm Allied Sci. 2025;4(5):26–35

Photo
Shifa Salim Sayyad
Corresponding author

Student, ASPM'S KT patil college of pharmacy, Dharashiv - 413501, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Rafiya Ishtiyakhussaini Sayyed
Co-author

Student, ASPM's KT patil college of pharmacy, Dharashiv -413501, Maharashtra

Photo
Dr. Aamer Quazi
Co-author

HOD, Department of Pharmaceutics, ASPM's KT patil college of pharmacy, Dharashiv - 413501, Maharashtra

Shifa Salim Sayyad, Rafiya Ishtiyakhussaini Sayyed, Dr. Aamer Quazi, Recent Advances in Pharmacovigilance: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 9, 2912-2917, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22915684

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Oro-Dispersible Tabl...
Ashu Saini, Chitra Gupta, Deepak Saini, mohd Kashif...
Preparation And Evaluation of Herbal Ointment Usin...
C. Saranya, S. Vijayaragavan, J. Poovizhi, R. Perumal, G. Mouriya...
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (Ahus) Syndrome With Kid...
Varun Mathapati, Akanksha Badiger, V H Kulkarni , Chetan savant ,...
Rivaroxaban Vs. Apixaban After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Head-To-Head Pharmac...
Dr. S. Sathyamoorthi, C. Rifa Sidhik Fathima, B. Rashmi Avanticaa, R. Preethi, A. Prathap...
Comparison of Medication Adherence Assessment Tools in Patients: A Review...
Anupama Harigal, Madhura R, Kumari Muskan, K Lakshmi, Harshitha R...
More related articles
Preparation And Evaluation of Herbal Ointment Using ACACIA NILOTICA Bark Extract...
C. Saranya, S. Vijayaragavan, J. Poovizhi, R. Perumal, G. Mouriya, S. Harini...
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (Ahus) Syndrome With Kidney Injury In Pediatric Patien...
Varun Mathapati, Akanksha Badiger, V H Kulkarni , Chetan savant , Siddappa Dandanavar , Afifa Bidari...
Preparation And Evaluation of Herbal Ointment Using ACACIA NILOTICA Bark Extract...
C. Saranya, S. Vijayaragavan, J. Poovizhi, R. Perumal, G. Mouriya, S. Harini...
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic (Ahus) Syndrome With Kidney Injury In Pediatric Patien...
Varun Mathapati, Akanksha Badiger, V H Kulkarni , Chetan savant , Siddappa Dandanavar , Afifa Bidari...