View Article

Abstract

The National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) is an important force for overseeing drug registration, safety, quality, and efficacy in Brazil's pharmaceutical market, which is among the most dynamic in Latin America. In order to facilitate quicker market entry, this paper decodes ANVISA's regulatory pathways, emphasizing standard, priority, reliance, and simplified review mechanisms. The Specific drug classifications under different Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada (RDCs), dossier requirements, and the structure of the Common Technical Document (CTD) are described. Recent developments are covered, such as Resolution 954/2025, CADIFA certification, and the shift to entirely digital submissions through Data Visa. Strategies for pharmaceutical companies to maximize regulatory navigation are described, along with obstacles like lengthy approval processes, intricate biosimilar pathways, and administrative burdens. In the end, market entry in Brazil can be greatly accelerated by coordinating regulatory strategies with operational readiness.

Keywords

ANVISA, Brazil, Drug Registration, Pharmaceutical Regulation, Market Entry, CTD, GMP, CADIFA, Priority Review, Reliance Pathway, Biosimilars, Regulatory Affairs

Introduction

× Popup Image

The combination of rising healthcare needs, government support, and innovation, Brazil possesses one of the largest and most rapidly expanding pharmaceutical markets in Latin America. The Agency Nacional de Vigiláncia Sanitaria (ANVISA), which was founded in 1999 and guarantees that all medications and health-related products adhere to strict standards of quality, safety, and efficacy, is at the heart of this regulatory framework. ANVISA regulates food, cosmetics, medical devices, and other health products in addition to pharmaceuticals. Brazil has made progress toward increased international regulatory convergence by actively participating in global networks like ICH and PIC/S. Smoother approval processes, quicker access to cutting-edge medications, and increased market confidence are all made possible by this alignment. However, compliance, dossier submission, product classification, and adherence to several Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada (RDCs) that specify particular pathways must all be carefully considered when navigating Brazil's regulatory environment. ANVISA has updated its procedures to strike a balance between efficiency and patient safety in response to changing regulations, such as priority/reliance reviews and digital-only submissions through Data visa. [1]

  1. Overview of ANVISA Regulatory Framework

The Brazilian national regulatory body in charge of guaranteeing the quality, safety, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals, biologicals, cosmetics, medical equipment, and food items is called the Agency Nacional de Vigiláncia Sanitaria (ANVISA).

ANVISA’s core functions include:

  • Assessment and approval of novel medications and clinical studies
  • Supervision of the production, importation, and marketing of regulated goods
  • Facility inspections and GMP certification
  • Pharmacovigilance,advertising,andlabellingregulation.
  •  
  • Compliance with global best practices via partnerships with PAHO, WHO, and ICH

As an experienced supplier provider of regulatory affairs services in Brazil, DDReg works closely with local officials and ANVISA to provide timely, accurate, and compliant regulatory submissions. In order to keep you informed about ANVISA regulations, we also offer regulatory intelligence. [2]

Organizations part of Authorisation procedure in Brazil

In Brazil, CONEP (Central), CEP (Local Committee), and ANVISA are the three different organizations responsible for reviewing and approving regulatory documentation to begin a clinical study. The ANVISA and CONEP procedures operate concurrently. The Central Ethics Committee, known as the National Committee of Ethics in Research (CONEP), is connected to the Ministry of Health and is responsible for examining and approving the ethical aspects of clinical trials in Brazil. [3]

  1. Drug Registration Categories and Regulation in Brazil

New Drug

Before being registered with ANVISA, these innovative pharmaceutical products' safety, effectiveness, and quality are proven through both non-clinical and clinical research. Innovator medicinal formulations may contain a novel molecular entity, a novel or modified structure, a new indication, a new dosage form, a new dose administration technique, a new combination, or a new therapeutic role. Generic and comparable medications are compared to innovator medications. The requirements for innovator drug marketing authorization are listed in:

  • Law No. 6,360/1976 governs the registration of pharmaceutical products, medications, and drugs. Most of the rules governing pharmaceutical productsinBrazilarefoundinthislaw.
  •  
  • In Brazil, the marketing clearance of new drugs is governed by Resolution No. 136/2003.

The "product be recognised as safe and effective" and the submission of thorough data are two requirements that must be fulfilled in order for a novel drug to be registered (Article 16, Law No. 6,360/1976). A technical report and reports from pre-clinical and clinical trials must be submitted in compliance with the particular guidelines specified in Resolution No. 136/2003 in order to obtain marketing clearance. In contrast, Brazilian regulators continue to grant marketing approvals for innovative medications to local businesses that have not yet conducted a clinical trial. [2]

Generic Drug

A medication that shares the same active ingredient, dosage form, administration method, strength, and therapeutic use as the innovator drug and is bioequivalent to the reference drug. These can be used interchangeably with innovator drugs and are only made after the patent and exclusivity rights have expired. The CBD (Common Brazilian Denomination) or, in the event that this is not possible, the CID (Common International Denomination) must certify the safety, efficacy, and quality of these drugs. Brazil’s Generic Drug Act, approved by the Ministry of Health in 1999 under Law No. 9.787/1999, may be sold if it is manufactured in accordance with ANVISA quality standards and is pharmaceutically equivalent to the reference product. The cost of generic medications is typically 65% lower than that of patent or innovator medications. [4]

Similar medicines

The active ingredients, dosage form, strength, indication, and dosage of these branded generics are allegedly identical to those of innovator medications. Before generic versions were introduced in 1999, these medications had been around for a very long time. Resolution No. 1/1994 contains the marketing approval requirements for these products. Resolution RDC No. 133 of May 29, 2003 established pharmacokinetic and pharmacological equivalency studies as requirements for the authorization of comparable products.

This resolution also made it possible to compare similar medications with distinct pharmacokinetic characteristics, like area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax, to their reference product. In these situations, the product must be registered with a modified dose or dosage requirements; further efficacy and safety studies are not necessary. According to RDC No. 134/2003, In these situations, the product must be registered with a modified dose or dosage requirements, but further efficacy and safety studies are not necessary. [5] According to RDC No. 134/2003, similar medications that have already been approved must follow the guidelines of Resolution No. 133/2003; if not, they must submit clinical studies to change their registration to innovator medications.

Resolution No. 17/2007 repealed Resolution No. 133/2003 and required comparable drugs to be subjected to the same in vitro study requirements as generic drugs, including statistical analysis. However, Resolution No. 17/2007 does not specify that these drugs must be bioequivalent to their reference products or that similar drugs cannot be substituted for their reference drugs. In 2014, RDC No. 60/2014 was published for the registration of drugs (Innovator, generic, and similar drugs) in Brazil.

Since then, all similar medications have shown therapeutic equivalency, enabling them to replace reference drugs. Resolution RDC 200/2017 is the current Brazilian regulation for the marketing authorization of pharmaceuticals (including innovator, generic, and similar drugs). [6]

  1. Drug Registration process in Brazil

 

 

 

Fig 1. Steps of Drug Registration in Brazil [5]

 

 

Compliance with ANVISA standards helps ensure that your product meets Brazilian health and safety regulations, supporting market entry and building consumer trust. 

  • Authorization Requirements: When handling controlled substances like narcotics or psychotropics, pharmaceutical companies operating in Brazil are required to obtain an authorized license, Autorção Especial de Empresa (AE), from ANVISA. RDC No. 16/2014 governs the handling, production, and processing of materials for such products.
  • Petition and Protocol Registration: The secret to the registration process is creating a comprehensive petition and registering a protocol with ANVISA. Use the proper Código de Assunto (subject code) to accurately classify the product in order to expedite ANVISA's review process.
  • Product Classification: Accurately classifying your product is essential. Products that require special registration procedures include agrotóxicos, health products, and medical devices.
  • Medical Devices Registration (RDC 185/2001): Syringes, needles, and other medical supplies go through a different ANVISA registration process. RDC 185/2001 governs them, and unlike pharmaceuticals, they need risk-based classification and compliance checks. 
  • Continuous Compliance and Renewals: Product registrations in Brazil are good for ten years, after which they need to be renewed. This process should begin six to twelve months before expiration to avoid disruptions. [7]
  1. Classification of Drug Product in ANVISA

ANVISA oversees several drug classes each with unique regulatory pathways based on relevant RDCs.  

 

Table1. Classification of Drug Product In ANVISA [8]

Drug Type

RDC/Normative Instruction

Notes

Novel synthetic & semi-synthetic medications

RDC 753/2022

Standard approval pathway

Generic & Branded Generics

RDC 753/2022

Updated framework

Homeopathic & Anthroposophical products

RDC 721/2022

Special classification

Specific medications

RDC 24/2011 & RDC 242/2018

Low/medium risk drugs

Notified medications (low risk)

Norm IN 106/2021 & RDC 576/2021

Simplified notification

OTC medications

RDC 242/2018, Norm IN 285/2024, RDC 888/2024

Over-the-counter products

Medicinal herbs

RDC 26/2014, Norm IN 301/2024

Traditional/herbal products

Medicinal gases

RDC 870/2024

Specific handling required

Biologics

RDC 55/2010

Full dossier required

Pharmaceuticals for radiotherapy

RDC 738/2022

Specialized pathway

 

  1. Structure of Registration Dossier

The registration dossier in Brazil follows a two-part structure and is prepared in the electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) format. Part 1, corresponding to Module 1, comprises administrative data and local knowledge. Part 2, encompassing Modules 2, 3, 4, and 5, contains summaries of preclinical investigations, chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) information, nonclinical data and reports, and clinical data and Reports. [9]

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Dossier requirements for drug registration in Brazil

 

Table 2. Dossier Requirement for drug registration in Brazil [9]

Dossier Content

New Drugs

Branded Generic

Drug

Similar Drug

Module 1

Sanitary license of local representative

Local representative operating authorization

Registration of local Pharmacist at professional council

Petition form

Justification for product registration

Labeling of different presentations

Previous Communications with ANVISA

CPP issued from the HA in country of origin

GMP certificates issued from the HA in country of origin

GMP certificates granted by Anvisa

Registration status worldwide

Pharmacovigilance data

Product labeling in portuguese

TSE information

Module 2

2.1 Table of contents of Module 2

 

 

2.2 Introduction

 

 

2.3 Quality Overall Summary

 

 

2.4 Non-clinical Overview

 

 

2.5 Clinical Overview

 

 

2.6 non-clinical

 

 

2.7 Clinical Summary

 

 

Module 3

3.1 Table of contents of Module 3

3.2 Body of data

3.2.1 Drug Substance

3.2.2 Drug Product

3.3 Literature references used in Module 3

Module 4

4.1 Table of contents of Module 4

 

 

4.2 Study reports

 

 

4.2.1 Pharmacology

 

 

4.2.2 Pharmacokinetics

 

 

4.2.3 Toxicology

 

 

4.3 Literature references used in Module 4

 

 

Module 5

5.1 Table of contents of Module 5

 

 

5.2 Tabular listing of all clinical studies

 

 

5.3 Clinical study reports

 

 

5.3.1 Reports of biopharmaceutic studies

 

 

5.3.2 Reports of human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies

 

 

5.3.3 Reports of human pharmacodynamic (PD) studies

 

 

5.3.4 Reports of efficacy and safety studies

 

 

5.3.5 Reports of post-marketing experience

 

 

5.3.6 Case report forms and individual patient listings

 

 

5.4 Literature references used in Modulo 5

 

 

BE Studies

 

 

  1. CTD modules that comply with ICH guidelines

Dossier submissions must adhere to the Common Technical Document (CTD) format, which is in line with ICH guidelines

Module 1: Administrative Information and Prescribing Information

This module should contain documents specific to each region; for example, application forms or the proposed label for use in the region. The content and format of this module can be specified by the relevant regulatory authorities.

Module 2. Common Technical Document Summaries

 Module 2 should begin with a general introduction to the pharmaceutical, including its pharmacologic class, mode of action, and proposed clinical use. In general, the Introduction should not exceed one page.

 Module 2 should contain 7 sections in the following order:

• CTD Table of Contents

• CTD Introduction

• Quality Overall Summary

• Nonclinical Overview

• Clinical Overview

• Nonclinical Written and Tabulated Summaries

• Clinical Summary

Module 3:  Manufacturing and quality (CMC data)

Information on Quality should be presented in the structured format described in Guideline M4Q.

Module 4: Nonclinical Study reports(pharmacology/toxicology).

The nonclinical study reports should be presented in the order described in                        Guideline M4S.

Module 5: Clinical Study reports (Trials, BE, Comparability)

The human study reports and related information should be presented in the order described in Guideline M4E.

Submissions must include the Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) GMP certificate, Portuguese labelling and be filed electronically through the Data visa system.  

International applicants are required to designate a legally registered partner in Brazil to serve as the accountable party for importation distribution marketing authorization and post-market surveillance. [10]

 

  1. Anvisa Review Process of Registration Dossier

 

 

 

Fig 2. Anvisa Review Process of Registration Dossier [5]

 

  1. ANVISA GMP Inspection

The content included in the application for GMP inspection:

  • A filled-out, signed, and stamped petition form.
  • A current GMP certificate from the country of origin's health authorities. There is no need for a sworn translation for certificates in either Spanish or English.
  • There are two different kinds of master files: Site Master File (SMF) and Plant Master File (AMP).
  • The Periodical Product Review (RPP) and, if available, an Inspection Report from additional health authorities in the country of origin.
  • The following procedures are part of ANVISA's inspection schedule:
  • Approximately 6 months after receiving the inspection request, ANVISA conducts an inspection of the production facility.
  • Following the inspection, ANVISA grants the company the Good Manufacturing Practices certificate within a period of 45 to 60 days. [11]

 Timelines for ANVISA inspection:

ANVISA inspection of manufacturing site occurs approximately 6 months after submitting the request for inspection to ANVISA

ANVISA issues the Good Manufacturing Practice certificate to company 45 to 60 days after inspection [9]

 

PRIORITY REVIEW

STANDARD REVIEW

Registration

Post-approval Changes

Registration

Post-approval Changes

120 days

60 days

365 days

180 days

 

  1.  Regulatory Pathways for Faster Market Entry in Brazil

To speed up drug registration and market access ANVISA provides several mechanisms as mentioned below:

  1. Standard Market Authorization
  • Timeline: 365 days (standard), 120 days (priority review).
  • Notes: Official decision-making may extend these periods by up to one third. 
  1. Priority (Fast-Track) Review – RDC 205/2017

• The manufacturer satisfies ANVISA within 60 days of submission to another authority (such as the FDA or EMA).

• ANVISA has sixty days to make a decision or ask for more information following a formal request made within thirty days.

  1. Reliance and Expedited Pathway – RDC 913/2024, IN 289/2024

• Conditional approvals or quality modifications that require approval from stringent authorities (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, PMDA) are accepted by ANVISA.

• Simplifies biologics authorization and tech-transfer submissions.

  1. Simplified Pathways for Biosimilars and Biologics – RDC 875/2024

• Some clinical and non-clinical studies may be skipped if solid comparability data is available. [12]

  1. Recent Regulatory Updates for Drug Registration in Brazil

The Recent Changes that are to be followed for faster market approval are stated below: 

  • New and Innovative Medicines (2022): ANVISA unveiled an updated framework in October 2022 that provides both comprehensive and shortened registration pathways. When feasible, it allows data from previous clinical trials to be substituted for new ones, fostering innovation without compromising safety.
  • Resolution 954: comes into effect on January 21, 2025, and guarantees uniformity in quality and pricing compliance by streamlining the registration process and restricting submissions to businesses in the same economic group. [13]
  • API GMP certification or CADIFA: Available to foreign API manufacturers. It is transferred to other product registrations after confirming GMP compliance. Approval periods usually last for 15–18 months or up to 24 months for fixed-dose combinations.
  • Completely paperless filing: ANVISA will completely phase out paper submissions starting on March 13, 2025, and only accept digital dossiers via Data visa/eCTD. [14]
  1. Challenges associated with Drug Registration in Brazil
  • Delays in GMP Inspections: Product approvals are frequently delayed by backlogs caused by resource limitations.
  • Complex Dossier Requirements: Dossiers that are globally compliant might still need to be modified for ANVISA.
  • Language Barriers: Portuguese translations are more complicated and prone to mistakes.
  • Pharmacovigilance Oversight: Strong, regionally tailored pharmacovigilance systems are needed in Brazil. [15]

Longer market entry timelines are caused by the burden of comprehensive data submissions for clinical trials and manufacturing procedures as well as possible language barriers and regulatory changes. [16]

 

Limitations

Impact on Market Entry

Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product requirement

Delayed submissions and extends approval timelines

Slow review initiation & long deadlines

Delays in both starting and completing regulatory review

Strained clinical trial timelines

Risk of legal breaches and stalled research

Complex biosimilar pathways

Safety concerns due to non-comparative approvals; delays in market entry

Translation, GMP, import/tax burdens

Higher administrative cost and planning hurdles

Post-approval payment/access delays

Real-world availability delayed, prompting judicial recourse

Weak pharmacovigilance systems

Reduced transparency and slower safety response

 
  1. Strategies for Faster Market Entry in Brazil

Compliance with ANVISA standards ensures that the drug to be launched meets all health and safety regulations, supporting market entry and building consumer trust.

Strategic Product Categorization: Priority review should be done in the event of a public health emergency. Examine the shortened pathway for new drugs in compliance with 2022 recommendations. [17]

Leverage CADIFA for APIs: To expedite multiple filings, get GMP certification as soon as possible.

Master Data visa and eCTD Submissions:  Make sure the dossier is finished up front to minimize back and forth.

Audits: Make sure you are prepared to answer information requests and get ready for audits under Resolution 954. [18]

Engage Local Expertise: To assist you in navigating the intricacies of language law and procedure, choose knowledgeable Brazilian partners.

Pathways Reliance: increased reliance on EMA and FDA reviews to shorten turnaround times.

Digital Submissions: All new submissions must use the SEI platform.

Post-COVID Frameworks: Emergency approval processes are currently being modified for wider application.

Biosimilars Expansion: Brazil's strong interest in biologics is reflected in ANVISA's ongoing efforts to improve biosimilar guidelines. [19]

  1. Recent regulatory reforms and Digitalization for ANVISA
    1. Modernization & Digital Transformation

Electronic and Paperless Submissions To increase efficiency, traceability, and review speed, ANVISA will require all regulatory dossiers to be submitted electronically by March 13, 2025 (no more paper filings). Digital systems such as Data visa and eCTD formats will be used for this purpose. [20]

Digital Services & International Engagement In 2025, ANVISA established a specialized digital "Contact Us" channel to enhance accessibility and communication with users around the world, increasing stakeholder engagement and transparency. [21]

2.Regulatory Reform & Efficiency

 Streamlined Regulatory Pathways Simplified marketing authorization processes for pharmaceuticals and biological products are introduced by new frameworks like Resolution No. 954/2024, which went into effect in January 2025 and helps to expedite market access.

Optimized Approvals & Backlog Reduction A regulatory efficiency package was approved by ANVISA in late 2025 with the goal of modernizing review procedures for medications, clinical trials, and medical devices and reducing backlogs. This includes specialized clinical trial queues, risk-based prioritization, and temporary task forces to speed up reviews. [22]

 3.Global Alignment & International Standards

Convergence with Global Norms by participating in multilateral forums, bringing its digital and regulatory standards into line with international standards (like ICH), and improving predictability and promoting international cooperation, ANVISA keeps advancing regulatory convergence. [23]

CONCLUSION

ANVISA's evolving regulatory architecture offers a range of pathways appropriate for drug complexity and urgency, from conventional to accelerated or abbreviated routes. to guarantee adherence, expedite approvals, and lower time-to-market obstacles. It's critical to strategically match operational readiness and dossier with your regulatory strategy.

Therefore, with the right dossier digital readiness and pathway selection, pharmaceutical companies can significantly reduce their time to market in the quickly changing Brazilian healthcare market.

RESULT

In Brazil, ANVISA offers a variety of regulatory pathways that strike a balance between patient safety, innovation, and prompt access to medications. Priority review, reliance frameworks, and streamlined dossiers for biologics and generics provide accelerated pathways, but standard review timelines are still drawn out. Brazil is becoming more in line with international standards, as evidenced by recent regulatory changes like CADIFA certification and mandatory digital submissions. Efficiency is still hampered by issues like post-approval delays, translation requirements, and complicated documentation. Approval times can be significantly shortened through strategic dossier preparation, early GMP compliance, and cooperation with knowledgeable local partners. Pharmaceutical companies can therefore guarantee quicker and easier market access in Bazil by utilizing operational preparedness and regulatory flexibility.

REFERENCES

  1. “anvisa website drug concept and definitions,” [Online]. Available: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/medicamentos/conceitos-e-definicoes.
  2. “anvisa website petition affairs new drugs,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?poAssunto=11306&sArea=Medicamento.
  3. “anvisa website petition Affairs Branded Generic drug,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?pCoAssunto=150&sArea=Medicamento.
  4. “ANVISA website Petition affairs Non Branded Generic drug,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?pCoAssunto=155&sArea=Medicamento.
  5. G. T. P. L. K. R. P. H. M. A. P. .. Chinmayee U Gowda, “Regulatory aspect Concerning Generic Drugs Approval in "BRICS" Countries,” Journal of survey in Fisheries Sciences, vol. 10(45)915, April 2023.
  6. “Union Official JOURNAL. RDC 336/2020,” [Online]. Available: http://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-rdc-n-336-de-30-de-janeiro-de-2020-240823596.
  7. “Union Official Journal. Law 13.411/2016,” [Online]. Available: http://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?jornal=1&pagina=4&data=29/12/2016.
  8. “Uninon Official Journal. RDC 198/2017,” [Online]. Available: Union Official Journal. RDC 198/2017. Link: http://www.in.gov.br/web/guest/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/1432285/do1-2017-12-28-resolucao-rdc-n-198-de-26-de-dezembro-de-2017-1432281.
  9. p. p. M. V. S. R. M. ,. S. .. R. Pankaj Nerkar, International Journal of Drug regulatoryAffairs, vol. vol 11No3, no. Issue 3, 2023.
  10. “ANVISA Website. RDC 10/2011,” [Online]. Available: AnvisaWebsite.RDC10/2011.Link:http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3315504/%284%29RDC_10_2011_COMP.pdf/12352a77-c0ea-4c10-96e0-a551140a4d7b.
  11. “ANVISA Website . RDC 183/2017,” [Online]. Available: Anvisa Website. RDC 183/2017. Link: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3612364/%281%29RDC+n%C2%BA+183+-+2017-+english+version.pdf/dfeca3e7-8c83-43c1-bc41-0fa8ccafa5a7.
  12. “ANVISA .Drug Products- Regulatory Categories of drugs (Updated 27 june 2025),” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/english/regulation-of-products/drugs.
  13. “World Health Organization (WHO). Brazil health System Overview,” [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/countries/bra.
  14. “International Trade ADministration (ITA). Brazil-Healthcare Sector Overviwew. US Department of Commerce,” [Online]. Available: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/brazil-healthcare.
  15. “Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-OPERATION Scheme (PIC/S). PIC/S Parcipating Authorities- ANVISA.,” [Online]. Available: https://picscheme.org/en/members.
  16. “ANVISA. RDC No. 753, September 28,2022. provides for the Registration of drugs in Brazil.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-rdc-n-753-de-28-de-setembro-de-2022-432447998.
  17. “Brazil. Law No. 9787 of February 10, 1999 ( Generic medicines law ).,” [Online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9787.htm.
  18. “Anvisa - Regulation of Medicines.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos.
  19. “Anvisa. RDC No. 16, April 2, 2014. Good Manufacturing Practices for Medicines.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos/boas-praticas/rdc-16-2014.
  20. “The Paperless Revolution: A New Era For Document Submission In Brazil. Global Regulator Insights.,” [Online]. Available: https://globalregulatoryinsights.com/library/the-paperless-revolution-a-new-era-for-document-submission-in-brazil.
  21. “Pharma Regulatory Landscape of Brazil in 2025. lindin Article,” [Online]. Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pharma-regulatory-landscape-brazil-2025-ddregpharma-z2ouc/.
  22. “ANVISA Modernization Plan 2025-Regulatory progess. Pure Global.,” [Online]. Available: : https://www.pureglobal.com/news/anvisa-modernization-plan-2025---medical-device-regulatory-progress.
  23. “ANVISA Publishes Resolution RDC No. 954/2024 0n Marketing Authorization Applications. Demarest,” [Online]. Available: https://www.demarest.com.br/en/anvisa-publishes-resolution-for-marketing-authorization-applications-post-approval-changes-and-simplified-renewal-procedures/.

Reference

  1. “anvisa website drug concept and definitions,” [Online]. Available: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/medicamentos/conceitos-e-definicoes.
  2. “anvisa website petition affairs new drugs,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?poAssunto=11306&sArea=Medicamento.
  3. “anvisa website petition Affairs Branded Generic drug,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?pCoAssunto=150&sArea=Medicamento.
  4. “ANVISA website Petition affairs Non Branded Generic drug,” [Online]. Available: https://www9.anvisa.gov.br/peticionamento/sat/Consultas/ConsultaAssuntoCheckList.asp?pCoAssunto=155&sArea=Medicamento.
  5. G. T. P. L. K. R. P. H. M. A. P. .. Chinmayee U Gowda, “Regulatory aspect Concerning Generic Drugs Approval in "BRICS" Countries,” Journal of survey in Fisheries Sciences, vol. 10(45)915, April 2023.
  6. “Union Official JOURNAL. RDC 336/2020,” [Online]. Available: http://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-rdc-n-336-de-30-de-janeiro-de-2020-240823596.
  7. “Union Official Journal. Law 13.411/2016,” [Online]. Available: http://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?jornal=1&pagina=4&data=29/12/2016.
  8. “Uninon Official Journal. RDC 198/2017,” [Online]. Available: Union Official Journal. RDC 198/2017. Link: http://www.in.gov.br/web/guest/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/1432285/do1-2017-12-28-resolucao-rdc-n-198-de-26-de-dezembro-de-2017-1432281.
  9. p. p. M. V. S. R. M. ,. S. .. R. Pankaj Nerkar, International Journal of Drug regulatoryAffairs, vol. vol 11No3, no. Issue 3, 2023.
  10. “ANVISA Website. RDC 10/2011,” [Online]. Available: AnvisaWebsite.RDC10/2011.Link:http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3315504/%284%29RDC_10_2011_COMP.pdf/12352a77-c0ea-4c10-96e0-a551140a4d7b.
  11. “ANVISA Website . RDC 183/2017,” [Online]. Available: Anvisa Website. RDC 183/2017. Link: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3612364/%281%29RDC+n%C2%BA+183+-+2017-+english+version.pdf/dfeca3e7-8c83-43c1-bc41-0fa8ccafa5a7.
  12. “ANVISA .Drug Products- Regulatory Categories of drugs (Updated 27 june 2025),” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/english/regulation-of-products/drugs.
  13. “World Health Organization (WHO). Brazil health System Overview,” [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/countries/bra.
  14. “International Trade ADministration (ITA). Brazil-Healthcare Sector Overviwew. US Department of Commerce,” [Online]. Available: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/brazil-healthcare.
  15. “Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-OPERATION Scheme (PIC/S). PIC/S Parcipating Authorities- ANVISA.,” [Online]. Available: https://picscheme.org/en/members.
  16. “ANVISA. RDC No. 753, September 28,2022. provides for the Registration of drugs in Brazil.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-rdc-n-753-de-28-de-setembro-de-2022-432447998.
  17. “Brazil. Law No. 9787 of February 10, 1999 ( Generic medicines law ).,” [Online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9787.htm.
  18. “Anvisa - Regulation of Medicines.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos.
  19. “Anvisa. RDC No. 16, April 2, 2014. Good Manufacturing Practices for Medicines.,” [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos/boas-praticas/rdc-16-2014.
  20. “The Paperless Revolution: A New Era For Document Submission In Brazil. Global Regulator Insights.,” [Online]. Available: https://globalregulatoryinsights.com/library/the-paperless-revolution-a-new-era-for-document-submission-in-brazil.
  21. “Pharma Regulatory Landscape of Brazil in 2025. lindin Article,” [Online]. Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pharma-regulatory-landscape-brazil-2025-ddregpharma-z2ouc/.
  22. “ANVISA Modernization Plan 2025-Regulatory progess. Pure Global.,” [Online]. Available: : https://www.pureglobal.com/news/anvisa-modernization-plan-2025---medical-device-regulatory-progress.
  23. “ANVISA Publishes Resolution RDC No. 954/2024 0n Marketing Authorization Applications. Demarest,” [Online]. Available: https://www.demarest.com.br/en/anvisa-publishes-resolution-for-marketing-authorization-applications-post-approval-changes-and-simplified-renewal-procedures/.

Photo
Anjali Dudhate
Corresponding author

Dayanand Education Society Dayanand college of pharmacy latur

Photo
N.B Chalmale
Co-author

Dayanand Education society's Dayanand college of pharmacy, Latur, India.

Photo
Dr. Satpute. K. L
Co-author

Dayanand Education society's Dayanand college of pharmacy, Latur, India.

Photo
Sakshi swami
Co-author

Dayanand Education society's Dayanand college of pharmacy, Latur, India.

Photo
Pratima Shinde
Co-author

Dayanand Education society's Dayanand college of pharmacy, Latur, India.

Photo
Komal Landge
Co-author

Dayanand Education society's Dayanand college of pharmacy, Latur, India.

Anjali Dudhate, Sakshi swami, Pratima Shinde, Komal Landge, N.B Chalmale, Dr. Satpute. K. L, Drug Registration in Brazil: Decoding ANVISA’s Regulatory Pathways for Faster Market Entry, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 5783-5794, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20342384

More related articles
Herbal Based Microneedle Patches for Diabetes Mana...
Dhanasekar J., Snehal P., Nandhakumaran S., Lathamani L., Sudhama...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Nanoem...
Sakshi Surwase, Pramod Ingale, Bindu Rani Ram, Samiksha Jadhav...
Formulation And Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Ashwaga...
Sana Khan, Pramod Ingale , Bindurani L.G.P Ram, Ritesh Bankar...
Formulation, Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Antifungal Cubosomes Drug Deli...
Anup Ladhake , Furqan Shah, Vijay Waghulkar , Shailesh Jawarkar, Monika Jadhao...
Formulation and Evaluation of Antiseptic gel for Tridax Procumbens...
Saniya Pathan, Dr. Sampat Navale , Dr. Mangal Gaikwad...
Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: Pharmacology, Clinical Profile, and Anal...
Omkar Gosavi, Kuldeep Ramteke, Komal Aher, Rahul Lokhande, Ganesh Lamkhade, Sachin Bhalekar...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Multipurpose Herbal Liquid Shampoo...
Aarti Lahamage, Dhananjay Deshmukh, Dipak Ahire, Dipti Naikwadi, Jayraj Khedkar...
Herbal Based Microneedle Patches for Diabetes Management: A Novel Approach to In...
Dhanasekar J., Snehal P., Nandhakumaran S., Lathamani L., Sudhamani T., Selvakumar M., Monika P., Ka...
More related articles
Herbal Based Microneedle Patches for Diabetes Management: A Novel Approach to In...
Dhanasekar J., Snehal P., Nandhakumaran S., Lathamani L., Sudhamani T., Selvakumar M., Monika P., Ka...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Nanoemulgel Containing Tridax Procum...
Sakshi Surwase, Pramod Ingale, Bindu Rani Ram, Samiksha Jadhav...
Formulation And Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Ashwagandha Buccal Film Using Fenugre...
Sana Khan, Pramod Ingale , Bindurani L.G.P Ram, Ritesh Bankar...
Herbal Based Microneedle Patches for Diabetes Management: A Novel Approach to In...
Dhanasekar J., Snehal P., Nandhakumaran S., Lathamani L., Sudhamani T., Selvakumar M., Monika P., Ka...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Nanoemulgel Containing Tridax Procum...
Sakshi Surwase, Pramod Ingale, Bindu Rani Ram, Samiksha Jadhav...
Formulation And Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Ashwagandha Buccal Film Using Fenugre...
Sana Khan, Pramod Ingale , Bindurani L.G.P Ram, Ritesh Bankar...