We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Hygia Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
Estimating medicines in pharmaceutical dosage forms has significance for quality control and regulatory compliance. The establishment of reliable, precise and cost-effective analytical procedures is critical to ensuring both the security and efficiency of single and multiple- component compositions of drugs. The review mainly focuses on RP-HPLC techniques emphasizing the method validation as per ICH guidelines parameters and method development parameters. The review presents a relative and comparative evaluation of reported methods in terms of sensitivity, accuracy, precision and cost-effectiveness. Various categories of drugs including cholinergic drugs, anticholinergic drugs, neuromuscular blocking agents, adrenergic agents, antiadrenergic agents, antihistaminic & proton pump inhibitors, migraine drugs, NSAIDs & antipyretics, anti-rheumatoid and antigout are discussed with emphasis on their method optimization parameters such as s wavelength, flow rate, retention duration, mobile phase, and stationary phase. The assessment of reported methods is offered in tabular form to help with the selection of appropriate analytical techniques for standard quality analysis. In order to help researchers and analysts choose and create trustworthy analytical techniques for regular quality control and regulatory compliance, this review has come together to offer a streamlined resource.
Chromatography is a collection of methods for separating mixed substances by continuously distributing them between two phases, one of which moves in relation to the other. Chromatography is arguably the determiner analytical method for modern analysts. This technique is able to determine quantitatively numerous distinct elements existing in a blend with just one analytical technique. Differential rates of elution are used in chromatography to resolve solutes as they go through a chromatographic column [1]. Drug discovery, method development, and the manufacturing of different pharmaceutical dosage forms all depend heavily on analytical technique development and validation. These techniques are used to verify the identification, efficacy, transparency, and safety of pharmaceutical product. Separating and calculating the primary active drugs, any response impurities all possible synthesis intermediate and, any degradants are the objective of the HPLC process [2]. One of the most crucial instruments in analytical chemistry today is HPLC, which developed from conventional column chromatography. HPLC is an significant analytical method used in every phase for drug development like research, manufacturing etc. in the contemporary pharmaceutical industry. It is the method of choice for figuring out how pure novel chemical entities can be, monitoring changes in reactions during synthesis or scaling up processes, evaluating innovative formulations, and carrying out quality control and assurance on the final drugs [3]. The primary goals of establishing analytical techniques are the identification, purification, and final quantification of any necessary drugs, etc. The separation and characterisation of impurities and degradation products, analytical investigations, identification studies, and, lastly, parameter optimisation to particular requirements are the primary tasks involved in the analytical development of a technique. Therefore, an analyst can greatly benefit from the fundamental concepts presented in the review article above when estimating pharmaceutical formulations and bulk medications [4].
An important step in analytical chemistry is the development of RP-HPLC methods, which entail optimising many parameters to separate and quantify analytes in complicated mixtures as needed. Polar and non-polar compounds are separated using the well-known chromatographic technique known as RP-HPLC [5]. Reversed phase chromatography can separate molecules with a high degree of recovery and resolution if they have some hydrophobic characteristics. In RP-HPLC, the separation process is driven by the interaction of the stationary phase which is immobilised hydrophobic binders interact hydrophobically to the solute particles in mobile phase. Although there is much disagreement on the precise mechanism, most people believe that a positive entropy effect is responsible for the hydrophobic binding contact. According to reversed phase chromatography, the solute particles and immobilized binder are enclosed in a highly organized water structure due to the mostly aqueous nature of the initial mobile phase binding conditions [6]. The duration of the time taken for the sample to get across the column and get to the detector is also considered as the retention time of the certain material. As part of the HPLC process, a sample consisting of a combination of chemicals is run over a chromatographic column. An adsorbent material covers a packing material, such as silica particles, in this column. Different components of the sample will interact with the coating in different ways, causing the sample to flow along the column at varied speeds (7). RP-HPLC has recently shrunk, new stationary and mobile phases have been developed, and hyphenated techniques like LC-MS, which are shown in Figure No. 1, have been introduced.
Figure No.1. RP-HPLC Advancement
Newly developed stationary phases and mobile phases with improved selectivity and efficiency may enable more accurate separation and analysis of complicated substances. Smaller sample volumes can be analysed by miniaturised RP-HPLC, which shortens run times and uses less solvent. Hybrid approaches offer more precise and sensitive analyte detection by fusing the advances of mass spectrometry and RP-HPLC [7]. The word "method development" is broad. A necessary step in both quantitative and qualitative analysis is to design a novel method for either estimating the amount of material or verifying the presence of the necessary component. Validation is the process of determining the method's parameters. It also aids by highlighting the method's limitations and their scope. For any medicinal component to be beneficially utilised in any pharmaceutical sector, both method development and validation must be developed and established [8].
"Green chemistry" refers to chemistry-related practices and processes that facilitate the removal or bargain of the use and exposure to the substances that pose a risk to the human health or environment. Examples of acute and long-term toxicity hazards from chemicals include health and environmental effects. Green technology ideally refers to avoiding poisonous or hazardous solvents or reagents during analytical techniques, using safe, energy-efficient equipment and devices to complete analyses quickly. Owed to the relatively low cost of the used mobile phase and the relative accessibility of the HPLC-UV equipment in many laboratories, particularly those that specialise in quality control, the HPLC technique stayed evaluated as an inexpensive procedure overall. Additionally, the equipment is reasonably priced when compared to methods like UPLC and LC-MS that help produce sensitive and highly accurate results. It is crucial to emphasise that the method's short chromatographic run time facilitates the routine procedures of analysing several samples, one element at a time, for the ensuing optimisation of the created HPLC approach [9].
Factor influencing the development of RP-HPLC
An RP-HPLC procedure's performance could be impacted by a number of important issues. The following factors can affect the quantification and partitioning evaluations of complicated mixtures.
Table 1. Factors Affecting Method Development of RP-HPLC
|
Factor |
Description |
Impact |
|
Stationary Phase |
Column Type |
Determines Analyte Resolution [10] |
|
Mobile Phase |
Organic Solvent (e.g. acetonitrile, menthol) buffer type/pH, gradient/isocratic mode |
Influence elution time and peak shape [11] |
|
Column Temperature |
25-50°C; impact viscosity and selectivity |
Improves Reproducibility [12] |
|
Flow Rate |
Classically, 0.5-2 mL/min; affects analysis time and pressure |
Balances speed and efficiency [10] |
|
Detection Wavelength |
UV-Vis based on analyte absorbance maxima |
Enhances sensitivity [13] |
Table 2. Factor Affecting Validation [14], [15], [16]
|
Factor |
Description |
ICH Parameter |
|
Specificity |
Ability to separate analysed from impurities/degradants |
Ensures no interferences |
|
Linearity |
Correlation between concentration and response over range |
Range: 50-150 % of target |
|
Precision |
Inter-day accuracy and intra-day repeatability |
%RSD <2% typically |
|
Accuracy |
Recovery studies at different levels. |
98-102% recovery |
|
Robustness |
Tolerance to minor changes in limitations (e.g. flow ±0.1 ml/min). |
Confirms method reliability |
|
LOD/LOQ |
Lowest detectable/quantifiable concentrations. |
Signal-to-noise ratios |
This review article's main objective is to gather various analytical method development and validation methodologies that have been published for the estimate of a single drug or the estimation of many drugs at once and consolidate them for a thorough overview. The review primarily concentrates on RP-HPLC procedures, with an emphasis on method development parameters and validation in accordance with ICH criteria. The review presents a relative and comparative evaluation of reported methods regarding cost-effectiveness, sensitivity, accuracy, and precision. In order that help researchers and analysts choose and create trustworthy analytical techniques for regular quality control and regulatory compliance, this review has come together to offer a streamlined resource.
Cholinergic Drugs
Cholinergic medicines target acetylcholine, the primary transporter of the PNS. These medications are classified into two types: indirect and direct acting. Direct cholinergic agonists activate muscarinic receptors directly like choline esters (carbachol, bethanechol etc.) and alkaloids (cevimeline, pilocarpine). Indirectly cholinergic medicines upsurge the accessibility of ACH at cholinergic receptors like neostigmine [17]. Figure 2 depicts the structures of pharmaceuticals for which the validation and method development are elaborated in Table 3.
Table 3. Method validation and development of Cholinergic Agents
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Phase Stationary
|
Phase Mobile |
Rate of flow (ml/min) |
Wavelength (nm) |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Pilocarpine in Pilocarpus microphyllus (Rutaceae) (1a) |
RP-18 column (250 x 4.6 x 5 µm id) |
Phosphoric Acid, MeOH and Triethylamine |
1.0 |
215 |
[18] |
|
2. |
Bethanechol (1b) |
Phenyl Column |
0.05M ethanol-phosphate buffer (pH 6) combination with sodium 1-heptanesulfonate (98:2 v/v) |
1.0 |
190 |
[19] |
|
3. |
Neostigmine (1c) and Methylsulfate
|
Kromasil C18 Column |
Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (10:90) |
1.0
|
215 |
[20] |
|
4. |
Glycopyrrolate (1d) and Neostigmine |
Chromolith High Resolution RP-18e (4.6 × 100mm) |
Buffer Solution (pH 3.0) A: Acetonitrile and water (90:10) Mode: Gradient
|
0.5 |
220 |
[21] |
Figure No. 2. Structure of Cholinergic Drugs
Anticholinergic Drugs
The neurotransmitter acetylcholine is prevented from being used by the brain by a class of pharmaceuticals called as anticholinergics or anticholinergic drugs. For a variety of conditions, including allergies, Parkinson's disease, depression, heart disease, urine incontinence, and asthma, anticholinergic drugs are often prescribed to the elderly. Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter that produces cholinergic effects by binding to muscarinic receptors in the CNS and peripheral tissues. The use of anticholinergic drugs has been associated with reduced purposeful and cognitive act, lower worth of lifetime, worsened Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and cognitive weakening in elder adults [22]. Figure 3 depicts the pharmaceutical method validation and method development which are elaborated in Table 4.
Table No.4 Method validation and method development of Anticholinergic Medication
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Phase Stationary |
Phase Mobile |
Rate of Flow (ml/min) |
Wavelength (nm) |
Ref |
|
1. |
Atropine Sulphate in Bulk Drugs (3a) |
C18 Column |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (50:50): Methanol: 5 mmol |
1 |
264 |
[23] |
|
2. |
N-butyl bromide hyoscine and paracetamol (3b) |
C18 Column (25 × 0.46cm 5µm particle size) |
Methanol (50:50, v/v) pH Attuned to 3.9 with CF3COOH acid |
1 |
210 |
[24] |
|
3. |
Ipratropium Bromide (3c) with Glycopyrrolate |
XDB-C8 Column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm) |
MeOH: ACN: Trifluoracetic Acid: H2O as A and 0.3% TFA in water |
1.2 |
220 |
[25] |
Figure No. 3. Structure of Cholinergic Drugs
Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs
The primary effects of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) are as antagonists and agonists, although they too act at other locations at the neuromuscular junction. The only depolarising NMBD that is currently available is succinylcholine, which has a number of unfavourable side effects.
Similar to succinylcholine, less powerful non-depolarizing NMBDs function more quickly. Organ function is necessary for the metabolism and excretion of amino-steroid NMBDs.
Organ-independent breakdown occurs in benzylisoquinolinium compounds, although histamine is frequently released. To replace succinylcholine, a short-acting, non-depolarizing NMBD with a quick onset and short-lived DOA is needed [26]. Figure 5 contains the structure of the neuromuscular blocking drugs which are elaborated in the table 5.
Table No.5 Method development and validation of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Phase Stationary |
Phase Mobile |
Rate of flow |
Wavelength |
Ref |
|
1. |
Suxamethonium (4a) |
C18 Column |
Water at 100% |
0.6 ml/min |
218 nm |
[27] |
|
2. |
Rocuronium Bromide (4b) |
Inertsil Silica Ammonium Column |
Solution A of Sodium Perchlorate: Solution B of (Ammonium chloride + Ammonium) 75:25 |
1.0 ml/min |
215 nm |
[28] |
|
3. |
Sugammadex (4c) |
C18 Column |
Acetonitrile: Double Distilled Water (20:80 v/v%) |
1.0 ml/min |
210nm |
[29] |
Figure No. 4. Structure of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Adrenergic Drugs
The term "adrenergic medicines" refers to a wide range of drugs that attach to adrenergic receptors all over the body. These receptors include Alpha-1, Alpha-2, Beta-1, Beta-2, and Beta-3. Adrenergic medications have the variety of physiological effects by directly binding to one or more of these receptors. Certain drugs have specific effects by indirectly engaging with specific receptors. Adrenergic medications need to be categorised according to the particular receptors they bind. This article's main focus is on direct-acting medications like bronchodilators and vasopressors. Cocaine and amphetamines are two instances of indirect drugs (31). The structures of the adrenergic medications, which are detailed for pharmaceutical technique development and validation in Table 6, are displayed in Figure 5.
Table No.6 Method development and validation of Adrenergic Transmission
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Stationary Phase |
Mobile Phase |
Flow Rate |
Wavelength |
Ref |
|
1. |
Epinephrine (5a) |
C18 Column Luna Phenomenex |
Combination of H2O: Methanol: Acetic Acid (85:10:5), pH 3.1 with addition of Ammonium Acetate |
1 ml/min |
280 nm |
[30] |
|
2. |
Zotepine (5b) |
C18 G Column |
Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate (pH 3.0) and Ortho Phosphoric Acid: Acetonitrile (45:55) |
1 ml/min |
264 nm |
[31] |
|
3. |
L. Broad Beans L-Dopa in Vicia Beans |
C18 Column |
0.2 % and 1% MeOH: 99 % Formic Acid |
0.6 ml/min |
264 nm |
[32] |
|
4. |
Isoproterenol HCl (5d) |
Phenomenex Luna Column |
Methanol: 0.1% Triethylamine (pH 7.0) |
1 ml/min |
279 nm |
[33] |
Figure No. 5. Structure of Adrenergic Drug
Antiadrenergic Drugs
A medication that prevents adrenergic receptors from functioning is known as an adrenergic antagonist. Two groups comprise the five adrenergic receptors. The β adrenergic receptors are the first class of receptors. β1, β2, and β3 receptors are present. α-adrenoreceptors are found in the second group. Only α1 and α2 receptors are existing. The heart, kidneys, lungs, and digestive system are all close to adrenergic receptors[34]. Figure 6 depicts the structures of antiadrenergic drugs which are elaborated in table 7.
Table No.7 Method development and validation of Antiadrenergic Drugs
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Stationary Phase |
Mobile Phase |
Flow Rate |
Wavelength |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Methamphetamine (6a) and Propranolol (6b) |
RP18 |
50mM pyrrolidine: Acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) (pH 11.5) |
1ml/min |
214nm |
[35] |
|
2. |
Propranolol and Valsartan (6c) |
Hypersil C18 Column |
Acetonitrile: Methanol: 0.1 M dihydrogen phosphate) (50:35:15), (pH 3.5) |
1ml/min |
250 nm |
[36] |
|
3. |
Etizolam (6d) and Propranolol Hydrochloride |
Puritus C18 Column |
Ammonium Phosphate (pH 3): Acetonitrile |
1 ml/min |
245 nm |
[37] |
|
4. |
Atenolol (6e) |
ODS-3 Column (250mm × 4.6mm, 5µm) |
Acetonitrile: Water |
1 ml/min |
276nm |
[38] |
|
5. |
Brinzolamide (6f) and Timolol (6g) |
(15 cm × 0.46 cm, 5µm) Zorbax Eclipse Plus |
Acetonitrile: MeOH: Triethylamine Phosphate Buffer (20:10:70) |
1ml/min |
246 nm |
[39] |
|
6. |
Latanoprost (6h), Timolol and Benzalkonium Chloride (6i) |
Inertsil C18 Column (300 × 3.9 mm, 5µ) |
Acetonitrile: Buffer (40:60 v/v) |
1ml/min |
- |
[40] |
|
7. |
Brimonidine Tartrate (6j) |
Diamonsil C18 Column |
Triethylamine and MeOH: 10 mM Phosphate Buffer (pH 3.5) (15:85 v/v) |
1 ml/min |
246 nm |
[41] |
|
8. |
Cetirizine (6k), Fexofenadine (6l) with Pseudoephedrine (6m) |
Zorbax C8
|
Acetonitrile: MeOH: 0.5 % (pH 4.5) (30:20:50) |
1 ml/min |
218 nm and 222 nm |
[42] |
Figure No. 6. Structure of Anti-adrenergic Drugs
Antihistaminic & PPIs
Antihistamines are a family of medications that lessen pathophysiologic symptoms mediated by histamine. The primary targets of therapeutic targeting are the histamine H1 and H2 receptor subtypes, which mediate several physiological and pathological processes. While H2 receptor antagonists are used to suppress gastric acid secretion in conditions like gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and to further suppress gastric acid control in conjunction with proton pump inhibitors, H1 receptor antagonists are recommended for the treatment of IgE- and non-IgE-mediated allergic disorders, such as allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria [43]. A class of drugs known as proton-pump inhibitors significantly and permanently reduces the stomach acid production. This occurred due to the permanently blocking of the proton pump of the stomach. The body eventually produces new proton pumps to replace the irreversibly blocked ones as a result of normal cellular turnover, gradually restoring acid production [44]. Figure 7 have all the structures which are mentioned in the table 8 for method validation and method development of anti-histaminic & PPIs.
Table No.8 Method validation and Method development of Anti-histaminic & PPIs
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Stationary Phase |
Mobile Phase |
Flow Rate |
Wavelength |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Cetirizine HCl |
Phenomenex Luna 5µ C18 |
H2O: ACN (40:60 v/v) |
1 ml/min |
229 nm |
[45] |
|
2. |
Fexofenadine and Montelukast Sodium (7a) |
Hypersil BDS |
Phosphate Buffer: Acetonitrile |
0.7 ml/min |
233 nm |
[46] |
|
3. |
Ranitidine (7b) |
C18 Column (4.6×250mm, 5 µm) |
ACN: 0.1 M ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (50:50 v/v) (pH 5.2) |
1.0 ml/min |
225 nm |
[47] |
|
4. |
Ranitidine Hydrochloride and Domperidone (7c) |
Princeton SPHER C18 Column |
Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (40:30:30) |
0.6 ml/hr |
225 nm |
[48] |
Figure No. 7. Structure of Antihistaminic & Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
Anti-Migraine Drugs
The FDA has approved seven triptans that are sold to treat acute migraines. Naratriptan, Almotriptan, Sumatriptan, Zolmitriptan, Eletriptan, Frovatriptan and Rizatriptan are among them. As compared to NSAIDs as a class, triptans are markedly more costly. They are often used as an option when NSAIDs or paracetamol don't work or the headache is really bad. Triptans are serotonin receptor agonists that have a varied empathy for 5-HT1F receptors and a high affinity for 5-HT1D and 5-HT1B receptors. The suggested mode of action entails binding postsynaptic 5-HT1B receptors on blood vascular smooth muscle cells and presynaptic 5-HT1D receptors on dorsal horn neurones and trigeminal nerve terminals [49]. Figure 8 contains the structures of all the anti-migraine drugs which are elaborated in the table 9.
Table No.9 Method validation and development of Migraine Drugs
|
S. No |
Drug |
Phase Stationary |
Phase Mobile |
Rate of flow |
Wavelength |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Sumatriptan (8a) |
C18 ODS Column (250×4.6mm, 5µm) |
ACN: Buffer: MeOH (10:80:10 v/v/v) with ortho phosphoric acid (pH 4.5) |
1.0 3.ml/min |
221 nm |
[50] |
|
2. |
Rizatriptan (8b), Sumatriptan and Zolmitriptan (8c) |
Stainless Steel Column (4.6×250mm), C18 Silica |
Acetonitrile: Sodium Phosphate Buffer |
1.0 ml/min |
280 nm |
[51] |
|
3. |
Paracetamol Metoclopramide Hydrochloride (8d) and Sumatriptan Succinate |
C18 Column |
(60:40 v/v) KH2PO4 Buffer: Methanol |
1.0 ml/min |
- |
[52] |
Figure No. 8. Structure of Anti-migraine drugs
NSAIDs & Antipyretics
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs) belong to a class of therapeutic drugs that lower fever, reduce inflammation, lessen pain, and prevent blood clots. Heart attacks, kidney problems, and an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers are among the most common side effects, which vary depending on the particular medication, dosage, and length of usage. Aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and naproxen are the most common NSAIDs and may be purchased over-the-counter (OTC) in the majority of nations [53]. Due to its weak anti-inflammatory properties, paracetamol (acetaminophen) is typically not regarded as an NSAID [54]. Figure 9 depicts the structures of pharmaceuticals for which the method development and validation are elaborated in Table 11.
Table No.11 Method development and validation of NSAIDs & Antipyretics
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Stationary Phase |
Mobile Phase |
Wavelength |
Flow Rate |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Aspirin (38) and Omeprazole (39) |
C18 Column (4.6 x 150 mm) |
Methanol and 0.5% OPA (pH = 3.5) |
231 nm |
0.7 ml/min |
[55] |
|
2. |
Aspirin and Esomeprazole Magnesium (40) |
ODS-BP C18 Column |
Methanol: 0.05M phosphate buffer (orthophosphoric acid is used to modify pH 3 |
230 nm |
1 ml/min |
[56] |
|
3. |
Ibuprofen (41) and Famotidine (42) |
C18 Column |
Buffer: Acetonitrile |
213 nm |
1.5 ml/min |
[57] |
|
4. |
Diclofenac (43) and Tolperisone (44) |
(4.6 × 150 mm, 5µ) XDB C18 Column |
Phosphate buffer: ACN (70:30) (pH 3.4) |
260 nm |
1.0 ml/min |
[58] |
|
5. |
Montelukast |
C18 Column |
0.1 M Potassium dihydrogen phosphate: ACN (30:70) (pH 4.0) |
355 nm |
1.0 ml/min |
[59] |
Figure No. 9. Structure of NSAIDs & Anti-pyretic
Anti-rheumatoid & Antigout
The term "disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs" (DMARDs) refers to a class of seemingly unrelated medications that reduce the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The phrase is frequently used in opposition to steroids, which inhibit the immune response but are insufficient to prevent the disease's progression, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, which are substances that treat inflammation but not its underlying cause. In such situations, the phrase "antirheumatic" can be used without claiming to have an impact on the progression of the illness. The same class of medications has also traditionally been referred to as "slow-acting antirheumatic drugs" (SAARDs) and "remission-inducing drugs" (RIDs) [60]. Figure 10 shows all the structure of anti-rheumatoid & anti-gout which are concise in table 12.
Table No.12 Method Development and Validation Anti-rheumatoid & Antigout
|
S. No |
Drugs |
Stationary Phase |
Mobile Phase |
Flow Rate |
Wavelength |
Ref. |
|
1. |
Methotrexate (45) and Naringenin (46) |
(15 cm × 4.6 mm, 5µ) ODS C18 Column |
(pH 6.0) Phosphate Buffer: ACN |
1.0 ml/min |
302 nm |
[61] |
|
2. |
Methotrexate and Curcumin (47) |
ODS C18 Column (15cm × 4.6 mm, 5µ) |
Acetonitrile: 2% Acetic Acid |
1.0 ml/min |
360 nm |
[62] |
|
3. |
Allopurinol (48) |
(150 mm x 4.6 mm, 3 μm) YMC C18 Column |
0.1 M ammonium acetate |
1.0 ml/min |
255 nm |
[63] |
|
4. |
Alpha Lipoic Acid (49) and Allopurinol in Tablets |
C18 G Column (250×4.6mm, 5µm) |
ACN: (pH 4.6) 0.2 M Ammonium Acetate |
0.8 ml/min |
210 nm |
[64] |
|
5. |
Febuxostat (50) |
Column C18 |
Acetonitrile: Sodium Acetate Buffer (pH 4.0) (60:40 v/v) |
1.2 ml/min |
254 nm |
[65] |
Figure No. 10. Structure of Anti-rheumatoid & Antigout
CONCLUSION
For the simultaneous estimation of pharmaceutical bulk medicines, RP-HPLC methods provide reliable, verified solutions that provide impurity profiling, peak purity evaluation, and quantification in various dose forms. These methods, which have been refined in accordance with ICH criteria, exhibit great specificity, linearity, accuracy, and robustness, making regular analysis in the pharmaceutical industry easier. Future developments offer improved efficiency and border application in drug research, such as hyphenated methods like LC-MS and greener solvents.
FUTURE PROSPECT
By advancing this technique for a variety of processes, including QbD-driven, green chemistry, application in FDCs, stability indicating assays, and complex formulations like nano and lipid-based dosage forms, there are opportunities to develop and validate analytical methods for both single and simultaneous drug quantification in the future. Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and real-time release testing are used to optimise columns and integrate spectroscopic or at-line/online HPLC with chemometrics for continuous batch production. More reliable method development and validation by RP-HPLC are needed due to the growing number of diseases and the demanding nature of complicated formulation.
CONFLICT OF INTERSECT
The author declares no conflict of interest. No financial support or relationship with entities that could influence the work were received.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Hygia Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research's Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry is acknowledged by the author for supplying the materials and literature database that were necessary for this review.
REFERENCES
Syed Tahir Hussain Rizvi, Dr. Shiv Bhadra Singh, Analytical Method Development and Validation Methods for Estimation of Drugs in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: A Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 2265-2283, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20117089
10.5281/zenodo.20117089