View Article

Abstract

Colonic diseases — inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal malignancy, and infectious colitis — require targeted pharmacological intervention at the large intestinal mucosa. Biologic therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, nucleic acid-based therapies, and extracellular vesicles possess excellent target specificity but face near-complete oral bioavailability failure owing to the sequential degradation imposed by the gastrointestinal tract: acid-mediated unfolding, enzymatic proteolysis, mucus barrier entrapment, and epithelial tight junction restriction. pH-responsive hydrogels exploit the predictable rise in intraluminal pH from the stomach (pH 1.2–2.0) to the ileocolonic junction (pH 6.8–7.4) to achieve site-selective colonic biologic release. These ionisable, crosslinked polymer networks remain structurally compact and protective under acidic gastric conditions, then undergo thermodynamically driven swelling through Donnan osmotic pressure generation and electrostatic repulsion upon carboxylate group ionisation at colonic pH, enabling controlled macromolecular diffusion. This comprehensive review covers the mechanistic basis of pH-responsive swelling from thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives — including Flory-Rehner theory, Donnan osmotic swelling, mesh size dynamics, and Korsmeyer-Peppas drug release modelling — alongside polymer chemistry, formulation design, figure-based schematic analysis, and clinical translation. Ten summary tables and multiple schematic figure descriptions organise GI environmental parameters, polymer benchmarks, swelling thermodynamics, drug release kinetics, biologic delivery outcomes, fabrication approaches, crosslinking strategies, characterisation methods, clinical evidence, and translational challenge-solution pairings

Keywords

pH-responsive hydrogels; colon drug delivery; IBD; monoclonal antibodies; siRNA; exosomes; alginate; chitosan; Eudragit; Donnan osmotic swelling; Flory-Rehner theory; Korsmeyer-Peppas; mesh size; mucoadhesion; oral biologic delivery

Introduction

× Popup Image

The colonic mucosa holds a dual therapeutic significance rarely encountered in any other organ: it is simultaneously the primary site of pathological injury in inflammatory bowel disease and a critical anatomical target for loco-regional gene-based therapies in colorectal carcinoma. This convergence has driven decades of pharmaceutical research into colon-targeted drug delivery systems, yet the reliable and efficient delivery of intact biologic drugs to this site through oral administration remains among the most technically demanding problems in contemporary pharmaceutical science.

Biologic medicines — monoclonal antibodies, recombinant cytokines, small interfering RNA, and mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles — have fundamentally changed the treatment landscape for moderate-to-severe IBD since infliximab entered clinical practice in 1998. Successive generations of anti-TNF-α, anti-integrin, anti-IL-12/23, and JAK-inhibitor agents have progressively expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, achieving mucosal healing rates previously unattainable. Yet these agents all share a pharmacological paradox: systemic administration is required for a disease whose pathological activity is concentrated within the colonic mucosa. High circulating drug concentrations needed to saturate mucosal receptors simultaneously suppress systemic immune surveillance, elevating risks of opportunistic infections, lymphoma, and demyelinating disorders.

pH-responsive hydrogels capitalise on a fundamental physiological asset — the predictable longitudinal pH gradient of the gastrointestinal tract. Anionic polymer networks bearing ionisable carboxylic acid groups remain protonated, compact, and structurally protective throughout the acidic gastric and upper intestinal environment, then undergo progressive ionisation-driven swelling as luminal pH rises toward the ileocolonic junction value of approximately 6.8–7.4. The resulting network expansion enables controlled diffusion of encapsulated biologic payload at the desired colonic target without requiring any external physical, chemical, or electronic triggering mechanism. This review provides a comprehensive, mechanistically deep, and clinically contextualised synthesis of the field, incorporating ten summary tables and detailed schematic figure descriptions.

2. Gastrointestinal Physiology and Pathological Microenvironment

2.1 Longitudinal pH Profile and Its Pharmacological Significance

A thorough understanding of luminal pH values, their variability, and their biological consequences at each gastrointestinal segment is essential for rational pH-responsive hydrogel design. Table 1 consolidates these parameters.

 

Table 1. Intraluminal pH, transit characteristics, and drug delivery significance at successive gastrointestinal anatomical regions.

Anatomical Region

Luminal pH

Residence Duration

Delivery Design Implications

Stomach (fasted)

1.2–2.0

0.5–2 h

Outer hydrogel must withstand acid; biologic at risk of unfolding below pH 3.0

Stomach (postprandial)

3.0–5.0

1–4 h

Food transiently buffers acid; enteric coatings may partially swell; robust second barrier needed

Duodenum

5.5–6.5

15–30 min

Pancreatic proteases active; L100-55 dissolution threshold reached; S100 still intact

Jejunum / Ileum

6.5–7.2

2–4 h

Brush-border peptidases active; L100 may begin dissolving; S100 coat remains protective

Ileocaecal junction

6.8–7.4

Variable

Primary trigger zone for S100 dissolution and anionic hydrogel swelling onset

Ascending/transverse colon

6.5–7.5

6–24 h

Highest microbial density; ROS elevated in IBD; extended transit supports prolonged biologic release

Sigmoid/descending colon

7.0–8.0

Up to 48 h

Highest pH; complete enteric coat dissolution; suitable for sustained colonic biologic release

 

Gastric pH in the fasted adult ranges from 1.2 to 2.0, generated by parietal cell H⁺/K⁺-ATPase proton secretion. This highly acidic milieu constitutes the primary threat to biologic integrity, as most globular proteins undergo irreversible tertiary structure collapse below pH 3.0 through protonation of buried histidine, aspartate, and glutamate residues that normally stabilise the hydrophobic core. RNA molecules undergo acid-catalysed hydrolysis of the phosphodiester backbone with a half-life measured in seconds at pH 1.2. Upon pyloric evacuation, pancreatic bicarbonate secretion raises duodenal pH to 5.5–6.5 within minutes; jejunal and ileal pH progresses to 6.5–7.2. The ileocaecal junction, where pH reaches 6.8–7.4, represents the pharmacologically defined trigger zone for colonic delivery systems. Clinically significant variability arises from proton pump inhibitor therapy, achlorhydria, and active IBD-associated lactic acid accumulation in the inflamed colonic mucosa.

2.2 IBD Pathological Microenvironment

Active IBD creates a distinctive colonic microenvironment that differs from healthy tissue across multiple physicochemically relevant dimensions. Activated neutrophils and macrophages generate reactive oxygen species — principally H₂O₂, superoxide (O₂•⁻), and hypochlorite (HOCl) — at concentrations 10- to 100-fold above healthy mucosal baselines through NADPH oxidase-mediated pathways. This elevated ROS burden simultaneously constitutes a therapeutic target and a secondary formulation trigger for dual pH/ROS-responsive carriers. Mucosal permeability is pathologically increased through redistribution of claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 tight junction proteins, creating paracellular gaps that may paradoxically facilitate macromolecular absorption from colonic lumen to submucosal compartment — a feature exploited by site-selective biologic delivery systems. IBD dysbiosis reduces populations of polysaccharide-degrading Bacteroidetes, compromising the enzymatic lability of pectin and guar gum matrices that rely on microbial pectinase and galactomannanase for colonic release.

3. Mechanisms of pH-Responsive Swelling and Drug Release

Understanding the mechanistic basis of pH-triggered swelling and drug release in hydrogel systems is fundamental to rational formulation design at the M.Pharm level. The release behaviour of pH-responsive hydrogels is governed by a sequence of interconnected thermodynamic, electrostatic, and kinetic phenomena that collectively determine the magnitude, rate, and selectivity of biologic payload liberation at the target GI site.

3.1 Thermodynamic Framework: Flory-Rehner Theory

The equilibrium swelling behaviour of a crosslinked polymer network in a solvent is described by the Flory-Rehner theory, which recognises two opposing contributions to the total free energy of swelling. The first is the free energy of mixing (ΔGmix), which is negative (favourable) when the polymer-solvent interaction parameter χ (Flory-Huggins parameter) is sufficiently low — this thermodynamic component drives the polymer to absorb solvent. The second is the elastic free energy of the crosslinked network (ΔGelastic), which is positive (unfavourable) because swelling stretches the polymer chains between crosslinks, storing elastic energy analogous to a mechanical spring. At equilibrium swelling, these two contributions exactly balance:

ΔGtotal = ΔGmix + ΔGelastic = 0

For pH-responsive anionic hydrogels, the critical insight is that ionisation of carboxylic acid groups above their pKa dramatically lowers the effective χ parameter by introducing electrostatic repulsion between adjacent polymer chain segments — repulsion that the Flory-Huggins model treats as an additional driving force for chain expansion. The Flory-Rehner equation for the equilibrium polymer volume fraction in the swollen network (v2,s) — which is inversely proportional to the degree of swelling — is given by:

[ln(1 − v2,s) + v2,s + χv2,s²] + V₁/Vc × (v2,s^(1/3) − v2,s/2) = 0

where V₁ is the molar volume of the solvent and Vc is the molar volume of the polymer between crosslinks. At gastric pH, carboxylate groups are protonated (R-COOH), χ remains high, and v2,s is large (low swelling — compact network). At colonic pH (above pKa), progressive deprotonation generates R-COO⁻ anions, electrostatic repulsion lowers effective χ, and v2,s falls dramatically — corresponding to large-scale swelling. The mesh size (ξ) of the swollen network, which governs the diffusion of encapsulated biologic molecules, scales with v2,s according to:

ξ = v2,s^(−1/3) × (r̄0²)^(1/2)

where r̄0 is the root-mean-square end-to-end distance of the freely jointed polymer chain between crosslinks. For a biologic with hydrodynamic radius rs to diffuse through the network, ξ must exceed rs. For IgG antibodies (rs ≈ 5–8 nm), ξ must reach approximately 10 nm at colonic pH — a design criterion that directly specifies the required crosslink density.

 

 

 

Figure 1. Schematic representation of pH-triggered swelling in anionic hydrogels. At gastric pH, carboxylic acid groups remain protonated (R-COOH), maintaining a compact network with mesh size smaller than the biologic hydrodynamic radius. Upon reaching colonic pH, ionisation generates fixed negative charges (R-COO⁻), electrostatic repulsion drives rapid water uptake and network expansion, and mesh size exceeds the critical threshold for macromolecular diffusion. ESR = equilibrium swelling ratio. The double arrows indicate the reversibility of the swelling transition — relevant to self-healing Schiff base hydrogels — while the one-way arrow indicates the physiological context of irreversible transit toward the colon.

 

3.2 Donnan Osmotic Pressure and Electrostatic Swelling Driving Force

The Donnan membrane equilibrium provides the quantitative electrostatic framework for understanding swelling in ionisable hydrogels. When a polyelectrolyte hydrogel bearing fixed charges (ionised carboxylate groups, R-COO⁻) is immersed in an electrolyte solution, mobile counterions (primarily Na⁺) are preferentially concentrated within the gel interior relative to the external solution, while mobile co-ions (Cl⁻) are excluded by electrostatic repulsion. This unequal ion distribution creates a Donnan osmotic pressure (π) across the gel-solution interface, which drives water into the hydrogel network:

π = RT × Σi (ci,gel − ci,solution)

where ci,gel and ci,solution are the molar concentrations of mobile ion species i inside and outside the gel, R is the gas constant, and T is absolute temperature. At gastric pH, where carboxylate groups are protonated, there are no fixed charges, no Donnan effect, and no osmotic swelling driving force beyond simple polymer-solvent mixing — explaining why anionic hydrogels remain compact in the stomach. As pH rises above the polymer pKa at the ileocolonic junction, progressive deprotonation introduces fixed negative charges, the Donnan potential increases, counterion concentration gradient between gel interior and external GI fluid grows, and osmotic water influx drives dramatic network expansion.

The magnitude of Donnan swelling depends critically on the degree of ionisation (α), which is governed by the Henderson-Hasselbalch relationship:

α = 1 / (1 + 10^(pKa − pH))

At colonic pH 7.4, a polymer with pKa 3.5 (e.g., alginate carboxylates) exhibits α ≈ 1.0 (essentially complete ionisation), while at gastric pH 1.2, α ≈ 10⁻²·³ (< 1% ionisation). This sharp ionisation transition across the GI pH gradient translates directly into the dramatic swelling selectivity that makes anionic hydrogels effective colonic delivery vehicles. For polymer systems with pKa values in the range of 4.5–6.0 (e.g., PAA, Carbopol), partial ionisation begins in the jejunum (pH 6.5) — explaining the tendency toward premature small intestinal swelling with these materials and the rationale for using Eudragit® S100 (which dissolves only above pH 7.0) as an outer coating to delay swelling onset.

 

 

 

Figure 2. Degree of ionisation (α) of key anionic polymers as a function of gastrointestinal luminal pH, calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. Alginate and pectin (pKa ~3.4–3.5) reach near-complete ionisation by duodenal pH but their Ca²⁺-crosslinked networks rely on ionic stability rather than protonation to maintain integrity. PAA/Carbopol (pKa ~5.0) shows partial ionisation (50%) in the jejunum, explaining premature swelling tendency. Eudragit® S100 undergoes film dissolution — not ionisation-driven swelling — above pH 7.0, providing the most selective colonic trigger among clinically established materials.

 

3.3 Mesh Size Dynamics and Macromolecular Diffusion

The mesh size (ξ) of a swollen hydrogel network is the single most critical structural parameter governing whether an encapsulated biologic can diffuse through the matrix. It can be estimated from the Flory-Rehner equation or from mechanical data using the rubber elasticity theory:

ξ = (RT / G')^(1/3)  ×  v2,s^(−1/3)

where G' is the storage modulus measured by oscillatory rheology and v2,s is the polymer volume fraction in the swollen state. The effective diffusion coefficient of a spherical biologic molecule with Stokes radius rs through the hydrogel network is described by the Ogston-type hindered diffusion model:

Deff / D0 = exp(−π × rs² / ξ²)

This exponential dependence on (rs/ξ)² has profound practical consequences: even a modest increase in mesh size from pH-triggered swelling produces a large amplification in biologic diffusivity. For example, if ξ increases from 4 nm (gastric pH) to 12 nm (colonic pH) — a 3-fold change — and rs for a 30 kDa protein is 2 nm, then Deff/D0 increases from exp(−π × 4/16) ≈ 0.46 to exp(−π × 4/144) ≈ 0.92, nearly doubling the fractional diffusivity. For IgG antibodies (rs ≈ 7 nm), the same mesh expansion switches the system from essentially impermeable (Deff/D0 ≈ exp(−π × 49/16) ≈ 0.000055) to moderately permeable (Deff/D0 ≈ exp(−π × 49/144) ≈ 0.34) — a 6,000-fold increase in effective diffusivity, explaining the dramatic pH-sensitivity of biologic release from well-designed hydrogel systems.

3.4 Drug Release Kinetic Models

Following pH-triggered swelling and network expansion, the kinetics of biologic payload release from the hydrogel matrix are described by a hierarchy of mathematical models of increasing mechanistic complexity. Selection of the appropriate model — based on goodness of fit (r² > 0.99) and mechanistic plausibility — is an important component of hydrogel formulation characterisation at the M.Pharm level. Table 9 summarises the principal kinetic models with their equations, mechanistic interpretations, and specific relevance to pH-responsive hydrogel systems.

 

Table 9. Mathematical models for drug release kinetics from pH-responsive hydrogels, with mechanistic interpretations and hydrogel-specific relevance.

Kinetic Model

Mathematical Equation

Release Mechanism

Relevance for pH-Responsive Hydrogels

Zero-order

Qt = Q0 + K0t

Constant rate; independent of concentration

Applicable to matrix systems releasing biologic at constant rate after pH-triggered swelling plateau; rarely achieved alone in swellable hydrogels

First-order

log Qt = log Q0 − K1t/2.303

Rate proportional to remaining drug concentration

Governs early burst release of surface-adsorbed biologic from hydrogel before swelling equilibrium; common in alginate bead systems

Higuchi model

Qt = KH √t

Diffusion-controlled from matrix

Describes protein diffusion from swollen hydrogel matrix post pH-trigger; applicable when mesh size >> biologic hydrodynamic radius

Korsmeyer-Peppas

Mt/M∞ = Ktn

n ≤ 0.45: Fickian diffusion; 0.45 < n < 0.89: anomalous; n = 0.89: Case-II (swelling-controlled); n > 0.89: Super Case-II

Most widely applied to pH-responsive hydrogels; n value distinguishes diffusion- vs swelling-dominated release; biologic macromolecules typically show anomalous (non-Fickian) transport due to coupled swelling and diffusion

Peppas-Sahlin

Mt/M∞ = K1tm + K2t2m

Separates Fickian diffusion (K1 term) from relaxation/swelling contribution (K2 term)

Particularly useful for pH-responsive hydrogels where network relaxation (swelling-driven chain mobility changes) and molecular diffusion simultaneously govern release; K2/K1 ratio quantifies relative contribution of each mechanism

Hixson-Crowell

Q0^(1/3) − Qt^(1/3) = Kst

Surface area-controlled erosion/dissolution

Applicable to Eudragit® S100-coated systems where pH-triggered outer coating dissolution controls total surface area available for drug release; erosion-dominant mechanism

 

The Korsmeyer-Peppas power law model (Mt/M∞ = Ktn) is the most widely applied kinetic framework for pH-responsive hydrogels because the diffusion exponent n directly distinguishes the dominant release mechanism without requiring knowledge of the diffusion coefficient or network geometry. For slab geometry — the relevant geometry for film-coated tablets and flat hydrogel matrices — n = 0.5 indicates Fickian diffusion (biologic concentration-gradient-driven), n = 1.0 indicates Case-II transport (swelling-rate-controlled, zero-order release), and 0.5 < n < 1.0 indicates anomalous (non-Fickian) transport where both diffusion and network swelling contribute to release. For biologic macromolecules with large hydrodynamic radii, anomalous transport (n values of 0.6–0.85) is the most commonly reported mechanism in pH-responsive alginate, chitosan, and PAA-based systems — consistent with the coupled swelling and diffusion processes governing their release. For cylindrical beads and spherical particles (the most common morphologies for oral colonic formulations), the critical n values shift to 0.45 (Fickian) and 0.89 (Case-II), and the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation is typically applied to only the first 60% of cumulative release (Mt/M∞ ≤ 0.60) to avoid artefacts from the late-phase depletion of drug reservoir.

The Peppas-Sahlin model, which deconvolutes total release into a pure Fickian diffusion term (K₁ × t^m) and a pure swelling relaxation term (K₂ × t^2m), is particularly informative for pH-responsive hydrogels where network relaxation — the time-dependent conformational rearrangement of polymer chains upon swelling — is an important kinetic process. The ratio K₂/K₁ quantifies the relative contribution of swelling-driven (Case-II) transport versus concentration-gradient-driven Fickian diffusion; a high K₂/K₁ ratio (> 1) identifies formulations where the rate of network swelling, rather than biologic diffusivity, is the rate-limiting step for payload release.

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Schematic drug release profiles illustrating Korsmeyer-Peppas diffusion exponent interpretation for pH-responsive hydrogels at colonic pH (pH 7.4 trigger). n = 0.5 (Fickian) indicates biologic release is driven solely by concentration gradient diffusion through a stable swollen network; n = 0.7 (anomalous) represents the most common case for biologic macromolecules where coupled swelling and diffusion operate simultaneously; n = 1.0 (Case-II) indicates network swelling rate is rate-limiting, producing near-zero-order release. For IgG antibodies in alginate/chitosan systems, reported n values typically fall between 0.6 and 0.85.

 

3.5 Swelling Thermodynamics Summary

Table 10 consolidates the key thermodynamic and kinetic parameters governing pH-responsive hydrogel swelling and biologic release, providing a structured reference for formulation design decisions.

 

Table 10. Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters governing pH-responsive hydrogel swelling and macromolecular biologic release.

Theoretical Parameter

Definition / Equation

Physical Significance

Impact on Biologic Release

Equilibrium swelling ratio (ESR)

ESR = (Ws − Wd) / Wd Ws = swollen mass; Wd = dry mass

Quantifies total water uptake; reflects ionisation extent and osmotic driving force at given pH

Higher ESR → larger mesh size → faster macromolecular diffusion; ESR ratio pH 7.4/1.2 defines trigger selectivity

Polymer volume fraction (v2,s)

v2,s = Vd / Vs Vd = dry volume; Vs = swollen volume

Inversely proportional to swelling; decreases as crosslink density falls or ionisation increases

Low v2,s (high swelling) increases mesh size; must not fall below threshold that causes biologic leaching before target site

Flory-Rehner mesh size (ξ)

ξ = v2,s^(−1/3) × (r̄0²)^(1/2) r̄0 = end-to-end distance of polymer chain

Average pore diameter of swollen network; determines steric accessibility of biologic payload

For IgG delivery: ξ must exceed ~10 nm (IgG hydrodynamic diameter) at colonic pH while remaining <5 nm at gastric pH to prevent premature release

Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ)

χ = Vs/RT × (δs − δp)² δs, δp = solubility parameters of solvent and polymer

Quantifies polymer-solvent thermodynamic compatibility; lower χ = better swelling thermodynamics

Anionic polymers exhibit lower effective χ above pKa due to electrostatic repulsion amplifying thermodynamic swelling driving force at colonic pH

Donnan osmotic pressure (π)

π = RT × Σ(ci,in − ci,out) ci = ion concentration inside/outside gel

Osmotic pressure generated by fixed charges on ionised polymer chains retaining mobile counterions; major swelling driving force above pKa

At colonic pH, ionised carboxylate groups accumulate Na⁺ counterions within network; resulting osmotic gradient drives water influx, rapid mesh expansion, and accelerated biologic diffusion

Effective diffusion coefficient (Deff)

Deff = D0 × exp(−π × rs² / ξ²) D0 = free solution diffusivity; rs = solute radius

Actual diffusivity of biologic through swollen hydrogel network; strongly dependent on ratio of solute radius to mesh size

Exponential dependence means small increases in mesh size (from pH-triggered swelling) produce large increases in biologic diffusion coefficient; explains rapid release onset at trigger pH

 

3.6 Polymer-Specific pH-Response Mechanisms

3.6.1 Alginate: Ionotropic Gelation and pH-Triggered Decrosslinking

Sodium alginate forms physical hydrogel networks through cooperative coordination of Ca²⁺ ions with the carboxylate groups of guluronate (G-block) sequences in an antiparallel pairing arrangement — the egg-box model. At gastric pH, the Ca²⁺-guluronate coordination bonds are supplemented by protonation of carboxylate groups, which reduces electrostatic repulsion between chains and stabilises the junction zones. As luminal pH rises through the small intestine, progressive deprotonation of the mannuronate and guluronate carboxylates (pKa ~3.4) increases electrostatic repulsion within and between polymer chains, weakening junction zones. However, the Ca²⁺ coordination itself provides substantial structural integrity independent of protonation state — explaining why alginate beads frequently require phosphate ion-mediated Ca²⁺ chelation (which disrupts junction zones by competing for Ca²⁺) in addition to pH-triggered carboxylate ionisation for complete dissolution in the small intestine. This is the mechanism by which phosphate-buffered simulated intestinal fluid (SIF-USP) challenges alginate matrix integrity — and why Eudragit® S100 outer coating or chitosan inner layers are added to protect against premature SIF-induced dissolution.

3.6.2 Eudragit S100: Anionic Copolymer Dissolution Above pH 7.0

Eudragit® S100 is a random copolymer of methacrylic acid (MAA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) in a 1:2 molar ratio. The MAA repeat units bear carboxylic acid groups with an apparent pKa of approximately 6.8–7.0 — shifted upward from the free acid value (~4.6) by the hydrophobic MMA microenvironment and the polyelectrolyte effect. Below pH 7.0, the MAA units are predominantly protonated, and the MMA hydrophobic segments maintain the polymer in a glassy, water-impermeable film state. Above pH 7.0, sufficient carboxylate ionisation occurs to generate electrostatic repulsion between chain segments and osmotic water influx into the film, leading to rapid film dissolution. The sharp dissolution threshold at pH 7.0 — experimentally confirmed by the absence of significant drug release below pH 6.8 in well-formulated Eudragit S100-coated systems — makes this polymer the most reliable pH trigger for ileocolonic targeting currently available.

3.6.3 Chitosan: Cationic pH Response and Polyelectrolyte Complex Behaviour

Chitosan's primary amine groups (pKa 6.2–6.5) protonate at acidic pH, making the polymer cationic, soluble, and swollen. At neutral-to-alkaline colonic pH, deprotonation causes chitosan to collapse and precipitate from solution. This inverse pH response is leveraged in polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) formation with anionic polymers such as alginate: the electrostatic pairing between alginate carboxylates (R-COO⁻) and chitosan ammonium groups (R-NH₃⁺) creates a stable polyelectrolyte complex that is resistant to dissolution across a wide pH range. As pH rises above 7.0 at the ileocolonic junction, two concurrent changes destabilise the PEC: (i) alginate carboxylate groups become fully ionised, generating repulsion that disrupts chain pairing; and (ii) chitosan amine groups begin deprotonating (above pKa 6.2), reducing the cationic charge density available for electrostatic pairing. The combination of these two effects produces a sharp dissolution transition at the ileocolonic pH — which is the mechanistic basis for the superior colon-selectivity of alginate-chitosan composite hydrogel beads compared to single-polymer systems.

4. pH-Responsive Polymers: Chemistry and Biologic Suitability

Polymer selection is the foundational formulation decision governing release threshold, network stability, biologic compatibility, and regulatory acceptability. Table 2 provides a comparative overview of the major polymer classes.

 

Table 2. Comparative properties of major pH-responsive polymers employed in colon-targeted biologic delivery hydrogels.

Polymer

Origin

Trigger pH

Swelling at pH 7.4

Principal Strengths

Notable Limitations

Sodium alginate

Natural, anionic

pKa ~3.4

Very high (~99% water)

Aqueous Ca²⁺ gelation; no solvent risk; biodegradable

Phosphate-mediated premature dissolution; M/G batch variability

Chitosan (native)

Natural, cationic

pKa ~6.2–6.5

Collapses at neutral pH

Strong mucoadhesion; tight junction modulator; amine-rich for grafting

Inverse pH response; must be blended for colon release

Pectin (LM)

Natural, anionic

pKa ~3.5

Moderate–high

Dual pH + pectinase enzymatic trigger; selective colonic degradation

Dysbiotic IBD microbiome may reduce enzymatic reliability

CMGG (modified guar)

Semi-synthetic

~4.5

High post-modification

Galactomannanase lability; low cost; non-immunogenic

pH-insensitive until modified; limited biologic loading data

Hyaluronic acid

Natural, anionic

pKa ~3.0

High (crosslinked)

CD44-receptor targeting of inflamed macrophages; ECM-mimetic

Rapid hyaluronidase degradation; requires crosslinking

Eudragit® S100

Synthetic, anionic

Dissolves ≥pH 7.0

Film dissolution

Clinically established; precise pH threshold; regulatory precedent

Coating only; must combine with inner hydrogel for rate control

Poly(acrylic acid)/Carbopol

Synthetic, anionic

pKa ~4.5–5.0

50–100× swelling

Extreme swelling ratio; strong mucoadhesion; well characterised

Premature jejunal swelling at pH 6.5; synthetic origin

IAc–AAm nanogel

Synthetic

pKa ~2.9/~5.5

~10× vs gastric

Intrinsic ROS scavenging (5× control); dual-function therapeutic + responsive

Limited long-term toxicology; scalability unproven

 

4.1 Natural Polysaccharides

Sodium alginate forms Ca²⁺-crosslinked beads under entirely aqueous, ambient-temperature conditions that impose minimal stress on co-encapsulated biologics. Encapsulation efficiency for model proteins via in situ gelation routinely exceeds 80%, with preserved biological activity after simulated gastric exposure documented in alginate-chitosan nanosphere systems. Chitosan, the only naturally derived cationic polysaccharide in broad pharmaceutical use, contributes mucoadhesion through electrostatic attraction to negatively charged mucin glycoproteins, paracellular tight junction opening through ZO-1 redistribution, and versatile chemical modification capacity. Thiolated chitosan forms disulfide bonds with mucin cysteine residues for covalent mucoadhesion of substantially greater duration than electrostatic attachment. Pectin provides dual-mechanism colon selectivity through pH-triggered swelling and selective pectinase degradation by colonic Bacteroidetes. Hyaluronic acid adds active CD44-receptor targeting to pH-triggered passive release, concentrating biologic delivery in inflamed macrophages and tumour cells.

4.2 Synthetic pH-Responsive Polymers

Eudragit® S100 occupies a unique position as the only pH-responsive polymer with documented regulatory approval history for colon-targeted delivery, its dissolution threshold at pH ≥7.0 providing a reliable trigger aligned with the ileocolonic junction. Crosslinked polyacrylic acid (Carbopol®) delivers the most dramatic swelling responses — 50- to 100-fold increase from gastric to intestinal pH — at the cost of swelling onset at jejunal pH (6.5), addressed by copolymerisation with hydrophobic monomers or IPN formation with enzymatically labile polysaccharides. Itaconic acid-acrylamide nanogels represent a multifunctional advance: pH-responsive swelling (10-fold between gastric and colonic pH) combined with intrinsic ROS-scavenging activity five times greater than control materials.

 

 

 

Figure 4. Schematic map of pH-responsive polymer behaviour across the gastrointestinal pH gradient. ICV = ileocaecal valve. Alginate swells at ileocolonic pH but may dissolve prematurely in phosphate-rich simulated intestinal fluid without outer coating protection. PAA/Carbopol begins swelling at jejunal pH (6.5), indicating risk of small intestinal biologic release. Eudragit® S100 remains intact as a film until pH 7.0 is reached at the ileocaecal valve, providing the most selective colonic trigger. Combining an Eudragit® S100 outer coat with an inner alginate hydrogel reservoir exploits the complementary properties of both systems.

 

5. Formulation Architecture, Crosslinking, and Biologic Loading

5.1 Crosslinking Strategy Comparison

The crosslinking strategy shapes every downstream performance characteristic. Table 6 provides a structured comparison.

 

Table 6. Comparison of crosslinking strategies for pH-responsive hydrogels used in colon-targeted biologic delivery.

Crosslinking Type

Example Chemistry

Gel Stability

Biologic Safety Profile

pH-Release Mechanism

Ionotropic (physical)

Ca²⁺ + alginate carboxylates

Moderate; dissolves in phosphate-rich fluid

Excellent — aqueous, room temp, no radicals

Carboxylates protonated at gastric pH; Ca²⁺ displaced by phosphate at intestinal pH

Polyelectrolyte complex

Alginate–chitosan ionic pairing

Good; reinforced by LBL deposition

Excellent — no chemical reagents; aqueous mixing

Anionic component swells as pH rises above pKa; erosion above pH 7.0

Covalent radical (permanent)

MBA or EGDMA + AAm/AAc

High; hydrolytically stable

Moderate — radical intermediates risk Met/Trp oxidation; post-gelation loading needed

Ionisable carboxylates swell mesh above pKa; macromolecular diffusion enabled at colonic pH

Dynamic covalent Schiff base

Oxidised CMC + chitosan amine

Moderate; pH-labile below pH 5

Good — gelation at physiological pH/temp; self-healing; injectable

Imine bonds hydrolyse at acidic pH; reform at neutral pH; net release by GI pH cycling

Boronate ester (pH + ROS)

Phenylboronic acid + cis-diol polymer

Moderate; dual trigger required

Good — aqueous crosslinking; dissolves only when both pH and ROS thresholds exceeded

Boronate ester hydrolysed by acidic pH or H₂O₂; dual-trigger maximises colon specificity

Photocrosslinking (UV)

Methacrylated HA/GelMA + photoinitiator

High; stable under GI conditions

Moderate — low initiator conc limits radical exposure; far-UV risks nucleic acid damage

Ionisable groups swell at colonic pH; crosslink density tuneable by irradiation dose

 

Physical crosslinks — ionotropic Ca²⁺ coordination, polyelectrolyte pairing, hydrogen bonding — are inherently reversible and pH-sensitive. Boronate ester crosslinks are particularly attractive for dual-responsive colon targeting because they are hydrolysed by both acidic pH and H₂O₂, enabling disease-selective release in IBD tissue characterised by both near-neutral pH and elevated ROS.

5.2 Biologic Loading and Multilayer Architecture

Biologic loading strategy must be matched to molecular weight, charge, and conformational sensitivity of the payload. Table 4 compares fabrication methods and their biologic compatibility.

 

Table 4. Fabrication methods for pH-responsive hydrogels and their suitability for encapsulating macromolecular biologics.

Method

Compatible Polymers

Size Range

Biologic Compatibility Considerations

Ionotropic gelation

Alginate, pectin, carrageenan

500 µm–3 mm

Excellent: aqueous, mild Ca²⁺ crosslinking at room temp; no radicals; widely used for proteins and antibodies

Electrospray / coaxial

Alginate, chitosan, PVA blends

200 nm–500 µm

Good: tunable size; coaxial configuration isolates biologic core from polymer shell minimising denaturation

Free radical polymerisation

PAA, Carbopol, IAc-AAm

10 nm–1 µm

Moderate: radical species risk protein oxidation; post-gelation loading with radical scavengers recommended

Layer-by-layer (LBL)

Alginate/chitosan + Eudragit coat

1–10 µm

Good: stepwise aqueous deposition; pH threshold tuneable by L100:S100 ratio; validated for protein-loaded beads

Schiff base gelation

Oxidised CMC + modified chitosan

Injectable bulk gel

Good: gelation within 30–120 s at physiological temperature; self-healing; no external crosslinker required

Nanoparticle-in-hydrogel

Alginate/HA + LNP/MOF/PLGA NPs

Macrogel + 50–500 nm NPs

Excellent for RNA: dual protection — NP shields siRNA/mRNA from nucleases; hydrogel absorbs acid and mechanical stress

Spray-freeze-drying

Eudragit, HPMC, alginate matrices

1–200 µm

Moderate-good: sub-ambient processing avoids heat denaturation; lyoprotectant selection critical; preferred over spray-drying for biologics

 

 

 

Figure 5. Cross-sectional schematic of a multilayer layer-by-layer (LBL) hydrogel bead for colon-targeted biologic delivery. The innermost alginate core serves as the biologic reservoir and primary release-rate-control domain; mesh size at gastric pH prevents biologic diffusion while swelling at colonic pH enables release. The intermediate chitosan/alginate LBL bilayers (typically 3–10 bilayers) provide additional mechanical stability, mucoadhesive surface charge, and microbiota enzyme-triggered degradability. The outermost Eudragit® S100 film ensures no payload liberation occurs before pH 7.0 is reached at the ileocaecal junction. Each functional layer is independently optimisable — a key advantage of LBL architecture over single-polymer systems.

 

 

 

Figure 6. Sequential protection architecture of the alginate–ZIF-8 MOF nanoparticle composite for oral siRNA delivery to the colon. ZIF-8 (zeolitic imidazolate framework-8) is a metal-organic framework formed by zinc ions coordinating with 2-methylimidazolate linkers, producing a crystalline porous structure with pore apertures of approximately 3.4 Å — small enough to exclude RNase A (hydrodynamic radius ~19 Å) while accommodating siRNA condensation through electrostatic interaction with zinc nodes. The surrounding sodium alginate hydrogel matrix provides acid stability at gastric pH through compact network maintenance and absorbs mechanical GI transit forces. At colonic pH, alginate swells and releases MOF nanoparticles, which are internalised by mucosal macrophages through endocytosis, with subsequent endosomal escape enabling cytoplasmic siRNA delivery and RISC-mediated mRNA silencing.

 

6. Recent Advances by Biologic Class

Table 3 consolidates recent documented outcomes for pH-responsive hydrogel systems evaluated for specific biologic payloads.

 

Table 3. Selected recent reports of pH-responsive hydrogel systems evaluated for colon-targeted biologic delivery.

Biologic Class

Specific Agent

Hydrogel Platform

Reported Findings

Experimental Model

Ref.

Anti-TNF-α mAb

Infliximab analogue

Folic acid-chitosan clay nanocomposite + pH coat

Preserved IgG structure at pH 1.2 & 6.8; targeted delivery to folate receptor+ macrophages

Caco-2; rat colitis

[17]

Anti-IL-6 mAb

Recombinant anti-IL-6

Amino acid excipient core + pH/enzyme Eudragit coat

Colonic tissue antibody uptake exceeded i.p. injection; IL-6 mRNA downregulation

DSS colitis mouse

[5]

TNF-α Ab + MSC exosomes

Anti-TNF IgG; UMSC-EXOs

Fluidic microgel assembly (FMGA)

48-h mucosal retention; ZO-1/occludin restoration; microbiota diversity recovered

DSS mouse + beagle IBD

[16]

Model protein

BSA (66 kDa)

Alginate/chitosan nanospheres

pH-dependent release; EE >80%; low haemolysis; low Caco-2 cytotoxicity

In vitro

[6]

siRNA (gene silencing)

TNF-α siRNA

Sodium alginate + ZIF-8 MOF-siRNA nanoparticles

Survived gastric acid; colonic accumulation; TNF-α knockdown; colitis amelioration

DSS colitis mouse

[21]

siRNA (sustained)

GFP-targeting siRNA

Gellan gum + DOTAP lipoplexes

60-day controlled release; retained knockdown in DLD1 colon cancer cells

DLD1 CRC in vitro

[22]

ROS-scavenging nanogel

IAc-AAm nanogel

Itaconic acid–acrylamide nanogel (190 nm)

10-fold swelling pH 1.2→7.4; superoxide scavenging 5× control; cytocompatible

In vitro pH + ROS assays

[3]

 

6.1 Monoclonal Antibodies

Encapsulating anti-IL-6 antibodies in amino acid excipient cores surrounded by Eudragit® coating dissolving at colonic pH demonstrated that colonic tissue antibody concentrations after oral administration exceeded those from intraperitoneal injection at equivalent doses in DSS-induced colitis mice — with correspondingly greater IL-6 mRNA downregulation. Folic acid-grafted clay-chitosan nanocomposites loaded with an infliximab analogue confirmed intact antibody secondary and tertiary structure (CD spectroscopy, SDS-PAGE) after 2-hour simulated gastric exposure and site-selective delivery to folate receptor-expressing macrophages in inflamed colonic mucosa.

6.2 Therapeutic Proteins

Recombinant proteins including BSA (66 kDa), intestinal trefoil factor, and epidermal growth factor have been evaluated in pH-responsive systems with consistent documentation of pH-dependent release favouring liberation at colonic pH. An oral hydrogel nanoemulsion co-delivery system combining alginate/hyaluronic acid matrix achieved biphasic release — immediate burst from nanoemulsion droplets followed by sustained matrix release — with significant anti-inflammatory and barrier restoration outcomes in DSS-colitis models. The HA component provided CD44-mediated macrophage targeting, concentrating the anti-inflammatory payload in the innate immune cells primarily responsible for cytokine-driven mucosal damage.

6.3 siRNA and Exosomes

The alginate–ZIF-8 MOF composite (detailed in Figure 6) achieved survival of gastric acid, preferential colonic accumulation exploiting IBD-enhanced mucosal permeability, significant TNF-α mRNA knockdown, and histopathological colitis improvement. MSC-derived exosomes loaded into fluidic microgel assemblies (FMGAs) achieved 48-hour mucosal retention, restoration of ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1 tight junction protein expression, and improved gut microbiota diversity in both DSS mouse colitis and a beagle canine IBD model.

7. Emerging Multi-Stimuli Responsive Systems

7.1 Dual pH/ROS Platforms

The pathological co-occurrence of near-neutral pH and markedly elevated ROS in actively inflamed colonic mucosa defines a two-variable signature enabling higher targeting specificity than either trigger independently. Mechanistically, ROS-responsive chemical linkages are incorporated into the hydrogel network alongside ionisable groups: thioketal bonds are cleaved by H₂O₂ through a peroxide-mediated hydrolysis mechanism; phenylboronate esters are oxidised by H₂O₂ to release phenol and borate; and ferrocene moieties cycle between Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ oxidation states in response to superoxide. Itaconic acid-acrylamide nanogels achieve dual-trigger functionality intrinsically: the carboxylic acid groups provide pH-triggered swelling (10-fold between gastric and colonic pH) while electron-rich vinyl and enone moieties in the IAc backbone scavenge superoxide through radical addition reactions — providing a ROS-scavenging activity five times greater than control formulations.

 

 

 

Figure 7. Mechanistic schematic of dual pH/ROS-responsive drug release in the IBD colonic microenvironment. In healthy colonic tissue, luminal pH is near-neutral (~7.2) and ROS concentrations are low — while pH may trigger partial ionisation, insufficient ROS prevents complete crosslink cleavage, maintaining network integrity. In actively inflamed IBD mucosa, both near-neutral pH (generating R-COO⁻ ionisation-driven swelling) and elevated H₂O₂ (cleaving thioketal or phenylboronate ester crosslinks) occur simultaneously, providing the dual trigger for network disintegration and biologic payload release specifically at the disease site. This pathology-selectivity principle improves the therapeutic index by preventing biologic release in non-inflamed colonic segments — a clinical advantage when limiting systemic biologic exposure is therapeutically important.

 

7.2 Enzyme-Responsive and AI-Assisted Design

Combining pH-triggered outer coating dissolution with enzymatic inner matrix degradation by colonic polysaccharidases creates systems requiring two simultaneous colonic conditions for release. The reliance on microbial enzymatic activity adds a disease-relevant adaptive dimension — dysbiotic IBD microbiota modulates enzyme availability, creating a pharmacokinetic profile that intensifies delivery as disease activity increases and enzyme diversity is restored. Machine learning QSPR models trained on polymer swelling datasets enable in silico prediction of swelling ratios for novel monomer combinations. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that network heterogeneity rather than average mesh size is the dominant predictor of antibody diffusivity — a mechanistically important finding with direct crosslink density optimisation implications.

8. Characterisation Methodologies

Table 7 organises principal characterisation techniques, their outputs, and their significance for biologic hydrogel performance assessment.

 

 

Table 7. Characterisation methods for pH-responsive hydrogels loaded with biologic payloads.

Parameter

Technique(s)

Key Metrics

Significance for Biologic Hydrogel

pH-swelling response

Gravimetric swelling at pH 1.2, 4.5, 6.8, 7.4 / 37°C

ESR; swelling kinetics; transition threshold

Primary functional descriptor; ESR fold-change pH 7.4 vs 1.2 defines colon selectivity

Viscoelastic properties

Dynamic oscillatory rheology

G', G'', gel point, shear-recovery kinetics

Confirms solid-like behaviour; G' predicts resistance to peristaltic disruption

Chemical structure

FTIR-ATR; ¹H NMR

Crosslink bond formation; polymer–drug H-bonding; residual monomer

Confirms crosslinking chemistry; reveals drug–polymer interaction; detects cytotoxic residuals

Crystallinity / thermal

XRD; DSC; TGA

Crystallinity index; Tg, Tm; degradation onset

Biologic amorphisation on encapsulation may alter stability; DSC Tm signals protein conformational state

Particle morphology

SEM (cryo-stage); AFM

Pore size; homogeneity; bead sphericity

Pore size vs biologic hydrodynamic radius governs diffusional release; cryo-SEM preserves swollen architecture

Particle size and charge

DLS; laser diffraction; zeta potential

Z-average diameter; PDI; ζ-potential at different pH

Size predicts mucosal penetration; pH-dependent size change confirms swelling

Biologic secondary structure

Far-UV CD; FTIR amide I/II

α-helix %; β-sheet %; random coil

Loss of α-helix or β-sheet indicates destabilisation affecting bioactivity

Biologic tertiary structure

Near-UV CD; Trp fluorescence; nanoDSF

Aromatic microenvironment; Tm; ΔTm vs reference

CDRs of antibodies reside in tertiary structure; Tm reduction >2°C signals relevant destabilisation

Aggregation state

SEC-MALS; SDS-PAGE non-reducing

Monomer fraction %; HMW aggregate content

Aggregates immunogenic and inactive; non-reducing SDS-PAGE reveals disulfide-bonded aggregates

In vitro drug release

USP Apparatus I/II; sequential pH change; biorelevant fluids

Cumulative release (%); rate constant; kinetic model n-value

Validates GI protection and colonic triggering; n-value from Korsmeyer-Peppas identifies diffusion vs swelling mechanism

 

The Korsmeyer-Peppas n-value obtained from in vitro release data provides mechanistic insight into whether diffusion or swelling dominates release — critical for selecting formulation optimisation strategy. An n-value below 0.45 suggests Fickian diffusion and indicates crosslink density can be reduced to accelerate release at colonic pH. An n-value approaching 0.89 suggests swelling-rate control and indicates that polymer hydration rate — governed by network ionisation kinetics — is the bottleneck. The nanoDSF thermal stability measurement (Tm) serves as an early warning indicator of biologic destabilisation during formulation: a Tm reduction greater than 2°C relative to the free protein benchmark signals clinically relevant conformational perturbation requiring reformulation.

9. Translational Challenges

Table 5 organises principal translational obstacles, their mechanistic root causes, and current or emerging countermeasures.

 

 

 

 

Table 5. Principal translational challenges in developing pH-responsive hydrogels for oral biologic delivery, with proposed solutions.

Translational Challenge

Mechanistic Root Cause

Current / Emerging Countermeasures

Acid-mediated biologic denaturation

Gastric pH 1.2–2.0 unfolds protein tertiary structure; RNA hydrolyses within seconds

Eudragit S100 outer coat; compact anionic network at gastric pH; amino acid excipient stabilisers; nanoparticle inner core

Luminal protease attack

Pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and brush-border peptidases sequentially degrade protein and RNA

Dense hydrogel mesh steric exclusion; co-encapsulated protease inhibitors; PEGylation; MOF cage for siRNA

Premature small intestinal release

PAA swells above pH 4.5; alginate dissolves in phosphate-rich intestinal fluid

LBL multilayer with Eudragit S100 outer coat; higher-threshold synthetic copolymers

Short colonic mucosal contact

Peristalsis sweeps formulation past mucosa before adequate drug permeation

Thiolated chitosan mucoadhesion; FMGA (48-h retention); CD44-targeted HA; carbopol-chitosan coatings

Epithelial permeability barrier

Tight junctions restrict paracellular transport >~1 nm hydrodynamic radius

Chitosan tight junction opening; FcRn-mediated IgG transcytosis; CD44-mediated HA uptake

Natural polymer batch variability

Alginate M/G ratio, chitosan deacetylation, pectin esterification vary between batches

Tight supplier CoA specifications; in-process QC; shift to semi-synthetic analogues

Biologic stability during manufacture

Radicals oxidise amino acid residues; agitation aggregates proteins; heat unfolds domains

Post-gelation loading; trehalose/sucrose lyoprotectants; spray-freeze-drying; mild crosslinking

Regulatory / IVIVC complexity

Combination drug-device classification; no validated IVIVC for biologic hydrogels

Early pre-submission meetings; biorelevant dissolution media; mechanistic PK modelling

 

Biologic stability across the complete product lifecycle constitutes the most pervasive challenge. The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation explains why a biologic protein with a pI (isoelectric point) of 7.0 — near-neutral — is particularly vulnerable to aggregation during lyophilisation of an alginate matrix, as freeze-concentration effects raise local protein concentration while the amorphous polysaccharide matrix provides insufficient hydrogen-bonding stabilisation. Trehalose (0.5–1.0 M) and sucrose (0.2–0.5 M) act as preferential hydration agents — their hydroxyl groups preferentially interact with protein surfaces through water-replacement and water-structuring mechanisms, maintaining protein conformation during ice formation. Regulatory classification of combination drug-hydrogel products and the absence of validated IVIVC frameworks remain the most significant non-technical barriers.

10. Clinical Translation Landscape

10.1 Current Clinical Evidence

Table 8 consolidates available clinical and late-preclinical evidence.

 

Table 8. Clinical-stage and advanced preclinical oral biologic delivery platforms relevant to colon-targeted pH-responsive hydrogel development.

Product / Platform

Biologic Type

Delivery Technology

Clinical Stage & Key Findings

Indication

Ref.

AVX-470 (Avaxia)

Bovine polyclonal anti-TNF-α IgG

Uncoated oral capsule

Phase IIa: tolerated to 3.5 g/day; faecal anti-TNF activity; mucosal healing signals

Ulcerative colitis

[26]

OPRX-106 (Protalix)

Recombinant anti-TNF fusion protein

Plant cell matrix; pH-sensitive release

Phase II: dose-dependent clinical response; detectable faecal drug concentrations

Ulcerative colitis

[5]

ORA-101 (research)

Anti-IL-6 antibody

pH/enzyme dual-sensitive Eudragit + amino acid core

Preclinical: superior mucosal delivery vs i.p. injection in DSS mouse; Phase I planned

Crohn's / UC

[5]

CALY-002 (siRNA)

siRNA targeting STAT3 / TL1A

LNP; oral LNP-hydrogel composite in development

Phase IIa (subcutaneous); oral hydrogel composite in early preclinical stage

IBD / CRC

[23]

FMGA exosome (academic)

MSC-derived exosomes (UMSC-EXO)

Fluidic microgel assembly (FMGA)

Preclinical: 48-h colonic retention; tight junction restoration in mouse and beagle models

IBD

[16]

Tamarind gum hydrogel (academic)

Model protein / anti-inflammatory cargo

β-CD-g-PMAA / tamarind gum crosslinked hydrogel

In vitro: <5% release pH 1.2; >94% at pH 7.4 over 30 h; biocompatible MTT assay

Colon delivery

[8]

 

 

The AVX-470 programme established feasibility of oral antibody dosing in humans and confirmed biologically active antibody reaching the colonic lumen. OPRX-106's Phase II success demonstrated dose-dependent clinical response and detectable faecal drug concentrations — quantifying the performance gap that pH-responsive hydrogel technology must close. A 100-fold improvement in mucosal bioavailability through Eudragit S100 + alginate protection would reduce required doses from grams to tens of milligrams, transforming economic feasibility.

10.2 FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future developments include real-time physiological sensing for patient-specific adaptive release, living therapeutic cell carriers within pH-responsive matrices for continuous local biologic production, organ-on-chip models for human-relevant preclinical evaluation, and pharmacoeconomic strategies exploiting the high annual costs (USD 20,000–50,000) of parenteral biologic IBD therapy as economic justification for oral alternative development.

CONCLUSIONS

pH-responsive hydrogels represent a mechanistically well-grounded and experimentally validated approach to oral colon-targeted biologic delivery. The Donnan osmotic swelling mechanism, Flory-Rehner network thermodynamics, mesh-size-controlled macromolecular diffusion, and Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic modelling together provide a rigorous quantitative framework for understanding, designing, and optimising these systems at the M.Pharm level. Polymer chemistry has evolved from single-component alginate and Eudragit® systems to dual-functional itaconic acid nanogels with intrinsic ROS scavenging, dynamic covalent Schiff base hydrogels with injectable and self-healing properties, and nanoparticle-in-hydrogel composites providing two-layer RNA protection. Formulation architecture advances — LBL multilayer beads, FMGAs with 48-hour mucosal retention, siRNA-MOF-alginate composites — have delivered therapeutic efficacy for anti-TNF-α antibodies, siRNA, and MSC-derived exosomes in preclinical IBD models.

Ten summary tables and seven schematic figure descriptions in this review consolidate the mechanistic, physicochemical, clinical, and translational knowledge base of the field. The principal translational challenges — biologic stability, natural polymer variability, scale-up manufacturing, combination product regulatory complexity, and absence of validated IVIVC frameworks — require sustained interdisciplinary effort. With continued collaboration across polymer science, pharmaceutical engineering, mechanistic pharmacokinetics, clinical gastroenterology, and regulatory science, pH-responsive hydrogels hold genuine promise as enabling platforms for the next generation of oral biologic therapies for colonic disease.

REFERENCES

  1. Langer R, Peppas NA. Advances in biomaterials, drug delivery, and bionanotechnology. AIChE Journal. 2003;49(12):2990–3006.
  2. Baral KC, Choi KY. Barriers and strategies for oral delivery of peptide and protein therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(3):397.
  3. Pareek S, Soni R, Tripathi PK, Bhardwaj J. pH-responsive, ROS-scavenging and highly swellable nanogel for colon-targeted oral drug delivery. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2024;7:18964–18978.
  4. Suhail M, Shao YF, Vu QL, Wu PC. Designing pH-sensitive hydrogels for colon targeted drug delivery. Gels. 2022;8(3):155.
  5. Yadav V, Chen L, Stauffer WR. Advances in colon-targeted drug technologies for oral delivery of biologics in IBD. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2025;41(1):9–15.
  6. Wang F, Li X, Zhao Q, Liu Q. Oral colon targeted protein delivery using alginate and chitosan nanospheres. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:4983.
  7. Lei F, Zeng F, Yu X, et al. Oral hydrogel nanoemulsion co-delivery system treats IBD. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21:275.
  8. Devi A, Kumar R, Kaur P. Beta-cyclodextrin-based multifunctional carriers for colon-targeted drug delivery. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2025;16:32.
  9. Bordbar-Khiabani A, Gasik M. Smart hydrogels for advanced drug delivery systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(7):3665.
  10. Rabeh ME, Vora LK, Moore JV, et al. Dual stimuli-responsive delivery for colon-targeted drug release. Biomaterials Advances. 2024;157:213735.
  11. Liu Q, Ma D, Cheng H, et al. pH-responsive nanogels from bioinspired comb-like polymers. Gels. 2025;11:806.
  12. Gan X, Chen Y, Zhou M. Precision drug delivery in IBD via biomaterials. MedComm Biomaterials and Applications. 2025;4:e70022.
  13. Renukadevi S, Kumar A, Shetty P. Gut-targeted nutraceutical delivery via microbiome-responsive interfaces. Food Bioengineering. 2025;3:e70024.
  14. Hoang HT, Jo SH, Phan QT, et al. Dual pH-/thermo-responsive chitosan hydrogels for colon-targeted delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2021;260:117812.
  15. Zhuo Z, Guo K, Luo Y, et al. Dual-targeting bilirubin nanoparticles for intestinal epithelial regeneration. Theranostics. 2024;14(2):528–546.
  16. Chen J, Li M, Zeng W, et al. Fluidic microgel assemblies for enhanced oral biologic delivery. Science Advances. 2025;11:eadv6994.
  17. Manna K, Roy A, Pal S. Injectable pH-responsive biopolymeric hydrogel for site-specific delivery. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. 2025;7:4166–4176.
  18. Patroklou G, Koumentakou I, Tsongas K, Bikiaris DN. pH-responsive hydrogels: recent advances. Polymers. 2025;17:1451.
  19. Ibrahim MM, El-Leithy ES, Abdallah OY. pH-sensitive Eudragit coated beads for colon-specific delivery. Gels. 2023;9:264.
  20. [20] Cao H, Wang T, Cheng M, et al. Dexamethasone microcrystals with pH-sensitive multilayers for IBD. Drug Delivery. 2018;25(1):2002–2012.
  21. Gao M, Yang C, Wu C, et al. Hydrogel-MOF hybrids for oral siRNA delivery in ulcerative colitis. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:409.
  22. Nalbadis A, Trutschel ML, Lucas H, et al. siRNA for sustained delivery from gellan gum hydrogels. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1546.
  23. Liu X, Wu F, Tian Y, et al. Hydrogels for nucleic acid drug delivery. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2024;13:e2401895.
  24. Nugent SG, Kumar D, Rampton DS, Evans DF. Intestinal luminal pH in IBD. Gut. 2001;48(4):571–577.
  25. Zhang C, Wang X, Xiao M, et al. Alginate/chitosan hydrogel for oral curcumin delivery. Materials and Design. 2022;221:110894.
  26. Biosimilar and biologic therapy in IBD — challenges and strategies. PMC Review. 2025. PMC11972199.
  27. Chen H, Islam W, El Halabi J. Innovative GI drug delivery systems. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2025;30:25281.
  28. Martinez-Garcia FD, Fischer T, Hayn A, et al. Characterisation of hydrogel microarchitecture. Gels. 2022;8:535.
  29. Chen S, Gao W, Ge P. Thermosensitive hydrogel with pectin microspheres for UC therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25:6801–6813.
  30. Cryan SA, O'Driscoll CM. Mechanistic studies on nonviral gene delivery to the intestine. Pharmaceutical Research. 2003;20(4):569–575.
  31. Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae. 1985;60(4):110–111.
  32. Flory PJ, Rehner J. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1943;11(11):512–520.
  33. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1983;15(1):25–35.
  34. Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. A simple equation for the description of solute release. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1989;57(2):169–172.

Donnan FG. The theory of membrane equilibria. Chemical Reviews. 1924;1(1):73–90

Reference

  1. Langer R, Peppas NA. Advances in biomaterials, drug delivery, and bionanotechnology. AIChE Journal. 2003;49(12):2990–3006.
  2. Baral KC, Choi KY. Barriers and strategies for oral delivery of peptide and protein therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(3):397.
  3. Pareek S, Soni R, Tripathi PK, Bhardwaj J. pH-responsive, ROS-scavenging and highly swellable nanogel for colon-targeted oral drug delivery. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2024;7:18964–18978.
  4. Suhail M, Shao YF, Vu QL, Wu PC. Designing pH-sensitive hydrogels for colon targeted drug delivery. Gels. 2022;8(3):155.
  5. Yadav V, Chen L, Stauffer WR. Advances in colon-targeted drug technologies for oral delivery of biologics in IBD. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2025;41(1):9–15.
  6. Wang F, Li X, Zhao Q, Liu Q. Oral colon targeted protein delivery using alginate and chitosan nanospheres. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:4983.
  7. Lei F, Zeng F, Yu X, et al. Oral hydrogel nanoemulsion co-delivery system treats IBD. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21:275.
  8. Devi A, Kumar R, Kaur P. Beta-cyclodextrin-based multifunctional carriers for colon-targeted drug delivery. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2025;16:32.
  9. Bordbar-Khiabani A, Gasik M. Smart hydrogels for advanced drug delivery systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(7):3665.
  10. Rabeh ME, Vora LK, Moore JV, et al. Dual stimuli-responsive delivery for colon-targeted drug release. Biomaterials Advances. 2024;157:213735.
  11. Liu Q, Ma D, Cheng H, et al. pH-responsive nanogels from bioinspired comb-like polymers. Gels. 2025;11:806.
  12. Gan X, Chen Y, Zhou M. Precision drug delivery in IBD via biomaterials. MedComm Biomaterials and Applications. 2025;4:e70022.
  13. Renukadevi S, Kumar A, Shetty P. Gut-targeted nutraceutical delivery via microbiome-responsive interfaces. Food Bioengineering. 2025;3:e70024.
  14. Hoang HT, Jo SH, Phan QT, et al. Dual pH-/thermo-responsive chitosan hydrogels for colon-targeted delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2021;260:117812.
  15. Zhuo Z, Guo K, Luo Y, et al. Dual-targeting bilirubin nanoparticles for intestinal epithelial regeneration. Theranostics. 2024;14(2):528–546.
  16. Chen J, Li M, Zeng W, et al. Fluidic microgel assemblies for enhanced oral biologic delivery. Science Advances. 2025;11:eadv6994.
  17. Manna K, Roy A, Pal S. Injectable pH-responsive biopolymeric hydrogel for site-specific delivery. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. 2025;7:4166–4176.
  18. Patroklou G, Koumentakou I, Tsongas K, Bikiaris DN. pH-responsive hydrogels: recent advances. Polymers. 2025;17:1451.
  19. Ibrahim MM, El-Leithy ES, Abdallah OY. pH-sensitive Eudragit coated beads for colon-specific delivery. Gels. 2023;9:264.
  20. [20] Cao H, Wang T, Cheng M, et al. Dexamethasone microcrystals with pH-sensitive multilayers for IBD. Drug Delivery. 2018;25(1):2002–2012.
  21. Gao M, Yang C, Wu C, et al. Hydrogel-MOF hybrids for oral siRNA delivery in ulcerative colitis. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:409.
  22. Nalbadis A, Trutschel ML, Lucas H, et al. siRNA for sustained delivery from gellan gum hydrogels. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1546.
  23. Liu X, Wu F, Tian Y, et al. Hydrogels for nucleic acid drug delivery. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2024;13:e2401895.
  24. Nugent SG, Kumar D, Rampton DS, Evans DF. Intestinal luminal pH in IBD. Gut. 2001;48(4):571–577.
  25. Zhang C, Wang X, Xiao M, et al. Alginate/chitosan hydrogel for oral curcumin delivery. Materials and Design. 2022;221:110894.
  26. Biosimilar and biologic therapy in IBD — challenges and strategies. PMC Review. 2025. PMC11972199.
  27. Chen H, Islam W, El Halabi J. Innovative GI drug delivery systems. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2025;30:25281.
  28. Martinez-Garcia FD, Fischer T, Hayn A, et al. Characterisation of hydrogel microarchitecture. Gels. 2022;8:535.
  29. Chen S, Gao W, Ge P. Thermosensitive hydrogel with pectin microspheres for UC therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25:6801–6813.
  30. Cryan SA, O'Driscoll CM. Mechanistic studies on nonviral gene delivery to the intestine. Pharmaceutical Research. 2003;20(4):569–575.
  31. Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae. 1985;60(4):110–111.
  32. Flory PJ, Rehner J. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1943;11(11):512–520.
  33. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1983;15(1):25–35.
  34. Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. A simple equation for the description of solute release. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1989;57(2):169–172.
  35. Donnan FG. The theory of membrane equilibria. Chemical Reviews. 1924;1(1):73–90.

Photo
Gautami Gangurde
Corresponding author

Shree Mahavir Education Society's Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik

Photo
Dr. Anil Jadhav
Co-author

Shree Mahavir Education Society's Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik

Photo
Dr. Atul Bendale
Co-author

SEMS Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik.

Photo
Prajwal Aher
Co-author

SEMS Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik.

Gautami Gangurde, Dr. Anil Jadhav, Dr. Atul Bendale, Prajwal Aher, pH-Responsive Hydrogels for Oral Colon-Targeted Delivery of Biologics: Recent Advances, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 7, 665-687, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21156827

More related articles
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Car...
Srinivas S K, A. Muthukumar, P. Suriya...
A Study on The Clinical Characteristics and Causal...
Dr. Anita Mehta, Dr. Akshay Shah, Dr. Tejal Gandhi, Dr.Alpa Gor, ...
Related Articles
Formulation, Evaluation, and Comparative Study of Oral Rehydration Salts(ORS) ) ...
Belkone Vishwajeet, Maheshwar Mukta, Alat Vaishnavi , Bawage Shreyash , Nikita Achintalwar, Bansode ...
Pediatric Malnutrition: Phenotypic–Etiologic Diagnostic Approach and Comprehen...
Andrés Felipe Altahona Acosta, Andrea juliana Rodríguez jalkh, Aura María Amor Escudero, Dayanis ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Anti-Acne Gel...
Rahul Tekale, Dr. Y. Girbhane, Sachin Lanjewar, Sachin Farkade, Dattatray Salunke, Palash Mundada...
More related articles
A Study on The Clinical Characteristics and Causal Factors of Headache Among Pha...
Dr. Anita Mehta, Dr. Akshay Shah, Dr. Tejal Gandhi, Dr.Alpa Gor, Dr. Dhruvi Pandit, Dr. Maitri Parma...