View Article

Abstract

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP), commonly known as Stone Man Disease, is an exceptionally rare and disabling genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification, in which bone forms within muscles, tendons, ligaments, and other connective tissues. The disorder is primarily caused by gain-of-function mutations in the ACVR1 gene, leading to abnormal activation of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways and irreversible ectopic bone formation. The disease usually manifests during early childhood with congenital malformations of the great toes, followed by recurrent inflammatory flare-ups that progressively restrict joint mobility and result in severe physical disability. Diagnosis is mainly based on characteristic clinical features, radiological findings, and confirmation through genetic testing. At present, no definitive cure is available, and management is focused on preventing trauma, controlling inflammation, relieving pain, and preserving quality of life. Emerging therapeutic strategies, including ACVR1-targeted therapies, activin A inhibitors, immunotherapy, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, and gene-targeted interventions, are currently under investigation and offer promising future treatment possibilities. In addition, selected herbal compounds with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, such as curcumin, ginger, Boswellia, Ashwagandha, and Ginkgo biloba, have been explored as supportive therapies, although robust clinical evidence remains limited. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, current therapeutic approaches, novel treatment strategies, and recent advances in FOP research. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease may facilitate earlier diagnosis and support the development of targeted therapies capable of improving long-term outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals.

Keywords

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva, Stone Man Disease, ACVR1 mutation, Heterotopic Ossification, Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Genetic Disorder, Targeted Therapy, Immunotherapy, Nanomedicine

Introduction

× Popup Image

An uncommon hereditary condition called fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive (FOP), formerly known as myositis ossificans progressive is characterized by extensive regions of progressive heterotopic endochondral ossification (HEO). Incidence is approximately one per 2 million people worldwide. The growth of an additional hard skeleton around the normal skeleton causes FOP, a terrible illness known as "Stone man disease," to have significant cumulative impairment. The disease is rarely identified in these kids at birth, despite the fact that they have some telltale symptoms such bilaterally undersized great toes with hallux valgus and aberrant calcaneal ossification. Hard bone masses grow in muscles, ligaments, aponeuroses, and joint capsules after the symptoms, which usually start in the first ten years of life with recurrent episodes of excruciating inflammatory soft tissue swellings. By the third decade of life, a patient's quality of life and everyday activities are severely limited due to a progressive loss of motion at numerous joints. The present choices for treatment are limited to palliative and symptomatic treatments as there is no known definitive cure for the disease.

Case report of a 10-year-old child who had multiple bony masses in different parts of the body and severe upper limb contractures due to joint contractures. The child never complained of painful soft tissue lesions or disease flare-ups, even after being questioned about the incident repeatedly [1]. Patin provided the first description of it. Its physiopathology is yet not fully known. odema affects the soft tissues, with the back of the neck being the most commonly afflicted area. This edema, which results from inflammatory processes, calcifies over time and causes the affected area to lose mobility. Trauma that occurs again may start the process.

 

Numerous therapies, including oral etidronate, isotretinoin, and steroids, have been tried, but with mixed success. According to in vitro chemical research, bisphosphonates reduce the

production of heterotopic bone during the active stage of the disease by adsorbing hydroxyapatite crystals. High ascorbic acid dosages, according to Palhares' observations,

slowed the disease's progression [2].

The two main features of FOP are increasing heterotopic ossification in certain anatomic patterns that results in early impairment and congenital skeletal abnormalities of the great toes. Even though genetic transmission is autosomal dominant, spontaneous novel mutations account for the majority of sporadic instances. Skeletal components merge with regular skeletal bone during childhood as new bone forms within soft connective tissue, such as skeletal muscle, tendon, and ligaments. Inflamed and swollen soft tissue occurs prior to ossification. Heterotopic bone development is sporadic, with ossification typically following a set pattern that begins in the neck and upper back. This condition is progressive leading to an early handicap due to contractures and joint fusions.

Any mild trauma, including intramuscular injections, or soft tissue injury might hasten the disease's natural progression. Additionally, blunt muscle damage from bumps, bruises, and falls, as well as mandibular blocks used for dental procedures, muscular exhaustion, and immobilization may encourage the production of heterotopic bone at the site of injury. Attempts to remove heterotopic bone surgically or by biopsy run the danger of inducing abrupt and excruciating development of new bone3. For FOP, there is currently no proven effective therapy. Although there is little concrete data to support it, radiotherapy treatment may have some therapeutic benefit for patients with FOP. Additionally, there is a dearth of literature on the subject of radiotherapy treatment for FOP patients [3].

1.1.      HISTORY

Previous natural history studies on flare-ups (FLOP) were carried out before the period of corticosteroid symptomatic treatment, more than 20 years ago, and analyzed a small number

of participants (about 40). Furthermore, because the FOP community was small and regional, these early investigations were neither worldwide nor comprehensive. The organized FOP community has expanded significantly over the last 20 years, partly because of the internet's and social media's explosive expansion as well as the efforts of concerned patients, physicians, and families [4]. Medical records from Dr. Guy Patin in 1692 describe people who suffer from FOP. Myositis ossificans progressive, the original name for FOP, was believed to be the result of muscle inflammation (myositis) that led to the production of bones. Victor A. McKusick renamed the condition in 1970 after it was found that the disease process also damaged soft tissue, such as ligaments, in addition to muscles [5].

The FOP case involving Harry Eastlack (1933–1973) is the most well-known. His illness started when he was ten years old, and by the time he passed away from pneumonia in November 1973—six days before turning forty—his body had fully ossified, limiting his range of motion to his lips[6].

But Eastlack gave science a gracious donation of his corpse, and his skeleton is currently housed at the Mütter Museum in Philadelphia, where it is an invaluable tool for researching FOP. In February 2019, the skeleton of Carol Orzel (April 20, 1959 – February 2018), a second person with FOP, was placed next to Eastlack's in the museum[7].

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig:1 :- Stoneman Disease

 

2.         EPIDEMIOLOGY

As of 2017, there were only about 800 cases of FOP confirmed worldwide, making it an extremely rare condition. Because of its rarity, FOP is regarded as one of the most unusual illnesses in human history. FOP affects individuals of all ethnicities and has an estimated incidence of 0.5 cases per million, despite its low prevalence. It's crucial to remember that these figures are still valid and applicable today[8].

About one in every two million persons worldwide are afflicted with FOP, an extremely rare genetic disorder. It impacts every geophysical predisposition and shows no respect for gender, race, or ethnicity. shows how diverse autosomal dominant trait transmission occurs expression when it occurs frequently and intermittently. The condition appears early in life and progresses postnatally. Life must go inexorably [9].

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare estimates that 500,000 individuals globally are impacted. FOP does not support a particular race, ethnicity, gender, or geographic area. FOP is extremely rare, occurring about once every two million people worldwide. There has been no mention of any racial, ethnic, or geographic predispositions. One of the rarest diseases ever discovered, FOP had approximately 800 confirmed cases worldwide as of 2017. The estimated 0.5 instances of FOP per million population affect all ethnic groups [10].

3.         PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

ALK2 transduction is triggered by ligand interaction and is caused by a gain of function mutation in the ACVR1/ALK2 gene, which codes for ALK2 kinases. In [11][12] One of the type II receptors, such as BMP receptor type II (BMPR-II), activin receptor type IIA (Acta-IIA), and activin receptor type IIB (Acta-IIB), and the TGF-β family ligands, such as BMP-6, BMP-7, BMP9, and activin B, bind to the extracellular domain of ALK2, a type I receptor[13].

As constitutively active ser/thr kinases, these type II receptors cause phosphorylation of ALK2 at the GS domain, which is made up of serine and glycine residues in the ternary complex that is created when the ligand binds to ALK2 at the cell membrane. As a result of this phosphorylation of ALK2, downstream substrates like SMAD1, SMAD5, and Smad8/9 have their serine and threonine residues phosphorylated, activating the kinase activity [14][15].When these phosphorylated Smad proteins attach to particular DNA sequences, they control the target genes' transcription in the nucleus, which causes the heterotopic ossification that fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva patients experience. As a result, all of these mutations cause intracellular signaling, in which ALK2 collaborates with type II receptors to function as  receptors[16][17].

 

 

 

 

Fig:2 :- PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF STONEMAN DISEASE

 

4.         CASE PRESENTATION

A 10-year-old child from Pakistan came to our clinic in Pakistan six months ago complaining of pain and sore spots on his left arm, left hip, and back. The pain started slowly and got worse over time, making it harder to walk and limiting shoulder and hip range of motion. Upon examination, the patient presented with several swellings on his left hip, left knee, right shoulder, and back. On the left arm, close to the anterior fold of the armpit and extending to the entire biceps, there was another firm lump visible. There was no warmth or inflammation visible, yet the mass hurt (Fig. 3). Upon palpation, all visible masses were found to be painful, and         all         abdominal         and         paraspinal         muscles         were          tight. There was a limit of 35 degrees on the left side and 10 degrees on the right side for abduction of both shoulders (Fig. 3).

 

 

(Fig. 3):-  Disease present in left shoulder

mass on the left arm and a restricted 35-degree angle in the abduction of the shoulders The patient did not have any other toe abnormalities other than bilateral hallux valgus

 

 

Fig:-4 :- Disease present in feet

He had severely limited range of motion in his left hip and was unable to walk or squat in a normal posture (Fig. 5).

 

 

Fig:5 :- Abnormalties occur in hip bone

There was no discernible lymphadenopathy. When the boy's parents examined him physically, they found no comparable anomalies.

Laboratory study results were within normal limits. The parents' financial difficulties prevented the performance of genetic analysis testing. Heterotopic ossification including the right knee, hips, shoulders, neck, and spine was visible on conventional radiography (Figs.6 and 7).

 

 

 

Fig :6 Abnormalaties Occur in Spine and Neck

 

 

 

Fig :7 :- Abnormalaties occur in Knee and Shoulder

 

At the start of the illness, there was no history of local trauma. The patient didn't have any siblings or a medical history in her family.

Concerning the patient's prior medical history, his parents stated that a surgical procedure resulted in the excision of a left hip ossification, which was followed by a brief improvement in the hip's range of motion. Periodic evaluations were conducted every two months, and the results of the evaluation revealed a flare-up (aggravation) of the ossification and substantial restriction in the left hip's range of motion. (Fig. 8).

 

 

 

Fig:8 :- Disease occur in left hip

 

 

 

 

X-ray follow-up following surgery or excision: Right hip ossification is present and equivalent to the preoperative x-ray; however, the left hip ossification has flared up excessively.

The patient was started on symptomatic treatment and his family was informed about the condition.

Counseling was provided, and it was suggested that minor trauma be avoided. It was noted at a recent follow-up that he was living a better quality of life than when he was last there. The patient will have radiological and clinical monitoring[18].

5.         OTHER NAMES [19]

 

 

 

Fig :9 :- Other name of stoneman Disease

 

6. Symptoms & Signs :

•           Swelling similar to a tumor in the shoulder and other joints; • Fusion of the toe bone

•           Thumb and little toe

•           Pain and fever

•           Swellings in tendons

•           A progressive neck fusion

•           Scoliosis, or abnormally curved spine on the side

•           Ossification of fibrous and muscle tissue

•           Limited range of motion in the neck, spine, wrist, shoulder, and knee

•           Eating disorders

•           Having trouble speaking

•           Congestive cardiac failure of the right side

•           A viral respiratory illness

•           Minimal intellectual impairment

•           Having trouble sitting and walking

 

7.Therapeutic approaches

As of right now, HO in FOP has no proven medical treatment. The primary therapeutic strategy is to prevent trauma or injury to the muscles. Growth and recurrence following ossification removal surgery are common outcomes. For spinal abnormalities, bracing is

ineffective; nevertheless, activity restriction can lessen damage. Occupational therapy and career education consultations are beneficial [20].

Temporary relief from flare-up symptoms can be achieved with high-dose corticosteroids; recurrent flare-ups can be treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) inhibitors, mast cell inhibitors, and muscle relaxants. Potential therapy involves blocking the ACVR1/ALK2 gene-related pathway, which stops aberrant

bone growth. Medication like rapamycin and palovarotene are undergoing clinical trials, and surgery is not usually the first choice for FOP patients [21]. A number of drugs, such as rapamycin and palovarotene, are presently under clinical studies to treat Stoneman syndrome. For some FOP patients who also have coexisting diseases, these drugs do have certain constraints and limitations. For example, the known teratogen palovarotene can cause limb abnormalities in the growing fetus and may harm the child's growth plates, hearing, and vision. Although most people tolerate the medicine well, mucocutaneous side effects are the main cause for concern. However, there are hazards associated with rapamycin use in kidney transplant patients, including dyslipidemia, proteinuria, and oral ulcers [22].Patients who had rapamycin treatment for vascular anomalies reported toxicity in their bone marrow, blood, and digestive tract. Rapamycin has a black-box warning that advises against using it in individuals with liver disease because of a higher risk of infection andimmunosuppression [23].

These    difficulties    add    to    the    difficulty    of    creating    treatments    for    FOP. There are various challenges in the way of developing new therapeutic targets for FOP. These difficulties are exacerbated by the disease's rarity and heterogeneity, our incomplete knowledge of its underlying mechanisms, the scarcity of appropriate animal models, worries about safety, and the possibility of flare-ups [24].Exaggerated inflammatory response is a hallmark of FOP, and any trauma or tissue injury can set off flare-ups that lead to the production of aberrant bone. There are few reliable animal

models that accurately mimic the features of FOP, and the disease's incomplete understanding makes it difficult to identify specific targets for therapeutic intervention [25].

 

Using therapeutic procedures, including surgery or medication therapies, is challenging due to the possibility of making the disease worse [26].

Finding new therapeutic targets for FOP could change the course of the condition, enhance symptom management, personalize treatment plans, lessen adverse effects, and advance our understanding of bone biology. These potential advantages give optimism for individuals .

8. Other aproach

8.1Immunotherapy

, which targets specific cells or molecules with the immune system, is a growing area of research in FOP. Researchers are investigating a number of

immunotherapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, that can precisely target the cells causing abnormal bone development. By controlling the immune system, these therapies aim to avoid or minimize HO in FOP [27-28]. Proteins known as monoclonal antibodies have the ability to bind to specific antigens on the surface of cells, triggering the immune system to begin eliminating those cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are drugs that can mute the immune system's signaling pathways, preventing it from attacking healthy cells. By using these immunotherapeutic drugs,

 researchers hope to enhance the immune system's capacity to identify and eliminate the aberrant cells that cause FOP [29-30].

8.2 Nanoparticle Delivery

Therapeutic medications may be delivered by nanoparticles to the affected tissues in FOP. Researchers are looking at the use of nanoparticles to deliver tiny medications, gene-editing instruments, and other therapeutic therapies specifically to areas of aberrant bone

development. This tailored delivery approach aims to minimize side effects and increase the effectiveness of potential FOP treatments [31].

Nanoparticles are minuscule particles that can be produced and have specific properties like size, shape, charge, and surface chemistry. Moreover, drugs, genes, or proteins can be added

to nanoparticles to make them therapeutic. It is possible to design nanoparticles such they can cross biological barriers, such as the skin's barrier or the blood-brain barrier, and get to the

intended areas. Additionally, targeting ligands, such as peptides or antibodies, that can recognize and bind to particular receptors on target cells can be designed into nanoparticles [32–33].

9. Research being done now on new therapeutic targets

Even though there is a lot of promise in finding new therapeutic targets for FOP, most of the current research is preclinical. Scientists are using in vitro studies and animal models to do extensive study on the safety and effectiveness of these emerging approaches. Numerous preclinical studies have looked into potential FOP treatments by examining the molecular mechanisms of HO and the effects of ACVR1 mutations. Promising targets include BMPs,

senescence, hypoxia, inflammation, and activin A. A ligand called activin A attaches itself to ACVR1 and causes HO in FOP. In animal models of FOP, inhibiting Activin A signaling with monoclonal antibodies or small molecules has been reported to decrease HO [34].

Ligands known as BMPs bind to ACVR1 and control the growth of new bone. It has been shown that BMP signaling inhibition by antibodies, small molecules, or gene therapy can prevent or correct HO in animal models of frontotemporal palsy [35].

Low oxygen levels, or hypoxia, are what cause HO to occur in FOP. In animal models of FOP, addressing hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) or downstream pathways with medications or gene therapy has been found to reduce HO [36].

Inflammation induces HO in FOP as a reaction to tissue damage or infection. In animal models of FOP, it has been demonstrated that modifying inflammatory cytokines,

chemokines, or receptors using medications or gene therapy attenuate

10. Herbal Treatments

1. Turmeric/Curcumin

Curcumin, a polyphenol in turmeric, has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that may help alleviate FOP symptoms [37].

2. Ginger

Ginger's anti-inflammatory compounds, gingerol and shogaol, may help reduce pain and inflammation in FOP patients [38].

3. Boswellia

Boswellia's anti-inflammatory properties may help reduce pain and inflammation in FOP patients [39].

4. Ashwagandha

Ashwagandha's adaptogenic properties may help reduce stress and anxiety in FOP patients [40].

5. Ginkgo Biloba

Ginkgo biloba's anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties may help improve circulation and reduce inflammation in FOP patients [41].

Important Notes

- These herbal treatments are not a replacement for conventional medical treatment. Consult a healthcare professional before using them.

- FOP is a rare disease, and more research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of these herbal treatments.

11.Drugs used in stoneman disease

Approved Treatments:

1. Prednisone (Glucocorticoid) - inflammation and flare-ups

2. Ibuprofen (NSAID) - pain management

3. Naproxen (NSAID) - pain management

12.Diagnosis

-Based on clinical findings, the deformity of the toes is the hallmark of FOP, whereas other developmental anomalies are primarily restricted to the cervical spine and thumb. One of the main abnormalities of FOP is stiffness of the neck. The spine mostly forms huge vertical bodies through the union of C2 and C7[42][43][44] . The majority of individuals have early-stage ankylosis of the spine. Many individuals experience flare-ups, fusions, and other hallmarks of FOP, which can lead to the development of arthritic symptoms. Short malformed thumbs, clinodactyly, short broad femoral necks, and proximal medial tibial osteochondromas are a few more symptoms of FOP patients [44][45].-Radiographic characteristics of FOP: X-rays and bone scans are unable to identify the disease in its early stages MRI and CT scans can reveal lesions to a certain degree. However, from a diagnostic or general perspective, radiographic data doesn't provide much proof of the illness. Therefore, it is better to follow the clinical results [46][47].-FOP Laboratory Parameters: The ankylosis of the skeletal tissues causes a rise in alkaline phosphate in the blood. When there is a flare-up, the ESR rate rises [42] .

For tracking the acute inflammatory phase, C-reactive protein is far better than ESR rate; however, there is no evidence to support this claim [43]. Because of the additional bone and flare-up, urinary parameters such fibroblast growth factors are also elevated [42]. During the fibroproliferative, chondrogenic, and osteogenic stages of flare-ups, there may be a rise in cartilage-derived retinoic acid protein (CD-RAP) [48].

-Genetic testing: A diagnosis of FOP before the onset of Heterotrophic Ossificans can be 

confirmed by conclusive genetic testing of FOP using DNA sequence analysis [49]

-ACVR1 Mutational Analysis: Using genomic DNA derived from regular venipuncture, DNA sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation were carried out in accordance with conventional procedures. By employing primers that flank the recurrent c.617G>A mutation found in patients with typical FOP, genomic DNA was amplified in order to screen for mutations

InACVR1[49].

DISCUSSION

Imaging tests and clinical manifestations are typically used to diagnose FOP. However, genetic analysis is required as well [50].

 The majority of documented FOP patients have the ACVR1 gene molecule (c.617G > A, p.R206H); those who have this classical molecule exhibit an early beginning of ossifications [51].

 The illness typically progresses severely and causes immobilization early on [52].

 In this patient population, the initial ectopic ossifications typically occur in childhood and are often characterized by spontaneous bone nodules [53].

 Nearly every patient observed the big toe's congenital deformity [54] .

In addition to immobilizing all major joints, the progressive development of ectopic ossification causes respiratory dysfunction due to severe scoliosis; the majority of patients have trouble breathing in their third or fourth decade of life [55].

CONCLUSION

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is an extremely rare and debilitating genetic disorder characterized by the abnormal formation of bone in soft tissues, a process known as heterotopic ossification.

As of 2017, fewer than 800 cases have been confirmed worldwide, with an estimated incidence of 0.5 cases per million people, affecting all ethnicities and genders. FOP typically presents in childhood, with the hallmark symptom being the congenital malformation of the big toe. Over time, the condition progresses, causing painful, spontaneous bone growth in muscles, tendons, and ligaments, leading to joint immobility and respiratory difficulties.

The underlying genetic mutation in the ACVR1/ALK2 gene causes a gain-of-function mutation, which triggers abnormal bone formation through the dysregulation of signaling pathways involving bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) family ligands.

Clinically, FOP presents with pain, swelling, and limited mobility in affected areas, often progressing to a severe form of ankylosis, particularly in the spine, resulting in a stiff, immobile neck and other skeletal deformities. Radiographic imaging, such as X-rays and MRI, may detect the lesions in later stages, but early diagnosis relies heavily on clinical observations and genetic testing. Inflammation during flare-ups is reflected by elevated markers like alkaline phosphatase, ESR, and C-reactive protein, while urinary markers may also rise during active phases.Genetic testing for mutations in the ACVR1 gene (c.617G > A, p.R206H) can confirm the diagnosis before heterotopic ossification becomes evident.

Unfortunately, despite advancements in understanding, there is currently no cure for FOP, and its progression often leads to severe disability, including respiratory complications in later life due to scoliosis and thoracic cage deformities.

REFERENCES 

  1. Tiwari V, Behera P, Sarawagi R, Rafi BM, Sahu S, Raj H, Rajpoot M. Atypical presentation of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2018;10(7).
  2. Moraes FB, Queiroz Filho AR, Silva LJ, Rocha VL, Araújo NP, Mendonça EQ, Almeida ÉP. Myositis ossificans progressiva: case report. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2012;47:394-6.
  3. Soldić Ž, Murgić J, Radić J, Dabelić N, Jazvić M, Marić Brozić J, Kusić Z. Radiation therapy in treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of the literature. Collegium antropologicum. 2011 Jun 24;35(2):611-4. 
  4. Pignolo RJ, Bedford‐Gay C, Liljesthröm M, Durbin‐Johnson BP, Shore EM, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. The natural history of flare‐ups in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a comprehensive global assessment. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2016 Mar 1;31(3):650-6.
  5. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  6. Kaplan, F. S. (2013). The skeleton in the closet. Gene, 528(1), 7–11.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.022

  1. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  2. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  3. Kishan A B, Raghavendra K, Vikram M P, Harman S G. Stone Man Syndrome : A Case Report and Review of Literature. J Pub Health Med Res, 2014;2(2):47-51.
  4. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F et al. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(5):e1295-300. doi: 10.1542/ peds .2007-1980.
  5. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat. 2009;30 (3):379-90. doi: 10.1002/humu.20868.
  6. Kan C, Ding N, Yang J, Tan Z, McGuire TL, Lu H, Zhang K, Berger DMP, Kessler JA, Kan L. BMP-dependent, injury-induced stem cell niche as a mechanism of heterotopic ossification. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jan 11;10(1):14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Repositioning in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Biomedicines. 2021 Feb 19;9(2) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Cappato S, Traberg R, Gintautiene J, Zara F, Boc Ciardi R. A case of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva associated with a novel variant of the ACVR1 gene. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1774. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Wu J, Ren B, Shi F, Hua P, Lin H. BMP and mTOR signaling in heterotopic ossification: Does their crosstalk provide therapeutic opportunities? J Cell Biochem. 2019 Aug;120(8):12108-12122. [PubMed]
  10. Twombly V, Bangi E, Le V, Malnic B, Singer MA, Wharton KA. Functional analysis of saxophone, the Drosophila gene encoding the BMP type I receptor ortholog of human ALK1/ACVRL1 and ACVR1/ALK2. Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):563-79, 1SI-8SI. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Kaplan FS, Tabas JA, Gannon FH, Finkel G, Hahn GV, Zasloff MA. The histopathology of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. An endochondral process. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):220-30. [PubMed]
  12. Shah ZA, Rausch S, Arif U, El Yafawi B. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (stone man syndrome): a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2019 Dec;13:1-5.
  13. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  14. . Clinical aspects and current therapeutic approaches for FOP. Kitoh H. Biomedicines. 2020;8:325. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: lessons learned from a rare disease. Akyuz G, Gencer-Atalay K, Ata P. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:716–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of rare skeletal diseases. Semler O, Rehberg M, Mehdiani N, Jackels M, Hoyer-Kuhn H. Paediatr Drugs. 2019;21:95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prophylactic treatment of rapamycin ameliorates naturally developing and episode -induced heterotopic ossification in mice expressing human mutant ACVR1. Maekawa H, Kawai S, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: what have we achieved and where are we now? Follow-up to the 2015 Lorentz workshop. de Ruiter RD, Smilde BJ, Pals G, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:732728. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Challenges and opportunities for drug repositioning in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Biomedicines. 2021;9:213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Current challenges and opportunities in the care of patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): an international, multi-stakeholder perspective. Pignolo RJ, Bedford-Gay C, Cali A, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: diagnosis, management, and therapeutic horizons. Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995352/ Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2013;10:437–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Recapitulation of pro-inflammatory signature of monocytes with ACVR1A mutation using FOP patient-derived iPSCs. Maekawa H, Jin Y, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cancer immunotherapies: from efficacy to resistance mechanisms - not only checkpoint matters. Wang S, Xie K, Liu T. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.690112/full. Front Immunol. 2021;12:690112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:651–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Macrophages in heterotopic ossification: from mechanisms to therapy. Huang Y, Wang X, Zhou D, Zhou W, Dai F, Lin H. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Modular fluorescent nanoparticle DNA probes for detection of peptides and proteins. Stawicki CM, Rinker TE, Burns M, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:19921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Mourdikoudis S, Pallares RM, Thanh NT. Nanoscale. 2018;10:12871–12934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. The stone man disease: fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: imaging revisited. Verma AK, Aga P, Singh SK, Singh R. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2022). Curcumin: A Review of Its Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties
  32. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ginger.
  33. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Boswellia.
  34. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ashwagandha.
  35. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Ginkgo Biloba.
  36. -ACVR1 Mutational Analysis: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation and DNA sequence analysis were conducted according to standard techniques from genomic DNA obtained from routinevenipuncture. Genomic DNA was screened for mutations in ACVR1 by PCR amplification using primers that flank the recurrent c.617G>A mutation identified in patients with classic FOP.[29]
  37. Kitterman JA, Kantanie S, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. Iatrogenic harm caused by diagnostic errors in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics, 2005; 116: e654–661.
  38. Schaffer AA, Kaplan FS, Tracy MR, O'Brien ML, Dormans JP, Shore EM, Harland RM, Kusumi K. Developmental anomalies of the cervical spine in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva are distinctly different from those in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome: clues from the BMP signaling pathway. Spine, 2005; 30: 1379–1385.
  39. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM, Glaser DL, Carroll L, Delai P, FastnachtUrban E, Forman SJ, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hoover-Fong J, Koster B, Pauli RM, Reardon W, ZaidiSA, Zasloff M, Morhart R, Mundlos S, Groppe J, Shore EM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat, 2009; 30: 379–390.
  40. Mahboubi S, Glaser DL, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatr Radiol, 2001; 31: 307–314.
  41. Reinig JW, Hill SC, Fang M, Marini J, Zasloff MA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: CT appearance. Radiology, 1986; 159: 153–157.
  42. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F, Connor M, Kitterman J, Sillence D, Zackai E, Ravitsky V, Zasloff M, Ganguly A, Shore EM. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificansprogressiva. Pediatrics, 2008; 121: e1295-e1300.
  43. The International Clinical Consortium on FOP The Medical Management of FibrodysplasiaOssificans Progressiva: Current Treatment Considerations. Clin Proc Intl Clin Consort FOP, 2011; 4: 1–100.
  44. Haga N, Nakashima Y, Kitoh H, et al. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: review and research activities in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2020;62:3–13.
  45. Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38:525–7.
  46. Ramirez-Gonzalez A, Castañeda-de-la-Fuente A, Castro-Cervantes V, Pineda C, Sandoval H, Hidalgo-Bravo A. Fibrodysplasia (myositis) ossificans progressiva (FOP). Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:1929–30.
  47. Smilde BJ, Botman E, de Ruiter RD, et al. Monitoring and management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: current perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:113–20.
  48. Okuno T, Suzuki H, Inoue A, Kusukawa J. Restricted mandibular movement attributed to ossification of mandibular depressors and medial pterygoid muscles in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1891–8.
  49. Bocciardi R, Bordo D, Di Duca M, Di Rocco M, Ravazzolo R. Mutational analysis of the ACVR1 gene in Italian patients affected with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: confirmations and advancements. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:311–8.
  50. Tiwari V, Behera P, Sarawagi R, Rafi BM, Sahu S, Raj H, Rajpoot M. Atypical presentation of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2018;10(7).
  51. Moraes FB, Queiroz Filho AR, Silva LJ, Rocha VL, Araújo NP, Mendonça EQ, Almeida ÉP. Myositis ossificans progressiva: case report. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2012;47:394-6.
  52. Soldić Ž, Murgić J, Radić J, Dabelić N, Jazvić M, Marić Brozić J, Kusić Z. Radiation therapy in treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of the literature. Collegium antropologicum. 2011 Jun 24;35(2):611-4. 
  53. Pignolo RJ, Bedford‐Gay C, Liljesthröm M, Durbin‐Johnson BP, Shore EM, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. The natural history of flare‐ups in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a comprehensive global assessment. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2016 Mar 1;31(3):650-6.
  54. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  55. Kaplan, F. S. (2013). The skeleton in the closet. Gene, 528(1), 7–11.
  56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.022

  57. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  58. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  59. Kishan A B, Raghavendra K, Vikram M P, Harman S G. Stone Man Syndrome : A Case Report and Review of Literature. J Pub Health Med Res, 2014;2(2):47-51.
  60. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F et al. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(5):e1295-300. doi: 10.1542/ peds .2007-1980.
  61. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat. 2009;30 (3):379-90. doi: 10.1002/humu.20868.
  62. Kan C, Ding N, Yang J, Tan Z, McGuire TL, Lu H, Zhang K, Berger DMP, Kessler JA, Kan L. BMP-dependent, injury-induced stem cell niche as a mechanism of heterotopic ossification. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jan 11;10(1):14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  63. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Repositioning in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Biomedicines. 2021 Feb 19;9(2) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  64. Cappato S, Traberg R, Gintautiene J, Zara F, Boc Ciardi R. A case of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva associated with a novel variant of the ACVR1 gene. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1774. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  65. Wu J, Ren B, Shi F, Hua P, Lin H. BMP and mTOR signaling in heterotopic ossification: Does their crosstalk provide therapeutic opportunities? J Cell Biochem. 2019 Aug;120(8):12108-12122. [PubMed]
  66. Twombly V, Bangi E, Le V, Malnic B, Singer MA, Wharton KA. Functional analysis of saxophone, the Drosophila gene encoding the BMP type I receptor ortholog of human ALK1/ACVRL1 and ACVR1/ALK2. Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):563-79, 1SI-8SI. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  67. Kaplan FS, Tabas JA, Gannon FH, Finkel G, Hahn GV, Zasloff MA. The histopathology of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. An endochondral process. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):220-30. [PubMed]
  68. Shah ZA, Rausch S, Arif U, El Yafawi B. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (stone man syndrome): a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2019 Dec;13:1-5.
  69. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  70. . Clinical aspects and current therapeutic approaches for FOP. Kitoh H. Biomedicines. 2020;8:325. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: lessons learned from a rare disease. Akyuz G, Gencer-Atalay K, Ata P. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:716–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of rare skeletal diseases. Semler O, Rehberg M, Mehdiani N, Jackels M, Hoyer-Kuhn H. Paediatr Drugs. 2019;21:95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Prophylactic treatment of rapamycin ameliorates naturally developing and episode -induced heterotopic ossification in mice expressing human mutant ACVR1. Maekawa H, Kawai S, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: what have we achieved and where are we now? Follow-up to the 2015 Lorentz workshop. de Ruiter RD, Smilde BJ, Pals G, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:732728. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Challenges and opportunities for drug repositioning in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Biomedicines. 2021;9:213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Current challenges and opportunities in the care of patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): an international, multi-stakeholder perspective. Pignolo RJ, Bedford-Gay C, Cali A, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: diagnosis, management, and therapeutic horizons. Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995352/ Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2013;10:437–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Recapitulation of pro-inflammatory signature of monocytes with ACVR1A mutation using FOP patient-derived iPSCs. Maekawa H, Jin Y, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Cancer immunotherapies: from efficacy to resistance mechanisms - not only checkpoint matters. Wang S, Xie K, Liu T. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.690112/full. Front Immunol. 2021;12:690112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:651–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Macrophages in heterotopic ossification: from mechanisms to therapy. Huang Y, Wang X, Zhou D, Zhou W, Dai F, Lin H. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Modular fluorescent nanoparticle DNA probes for detection of peptides and proteins. Stawicki CM, Rinker TE, Burns M, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:19921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Mourdikoudis S, Pallares RM, Thanh NT. Nanoscale. 2018;10:12871–12934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. The stone man disease: fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: imaging revisited. Verma AK, Aga P, Singh SK, Singh R. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2022). Curcumin: A Review of Its Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties
  88. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ginger.
  89. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Boswellia.
  90. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ashwagandha.
  91. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Ginkgo Biloba.
  92. -ACVR1 Mutational Analysis: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation and DNA sequence analysis were conducted according to standard techniques from genomic DNA obtained from routinevenipuncture. Genomic DNA was screened for mutations in ACVR1 by PCR amplification using primers that flank the recurrent c.617G>A mutation identified in patients with classic FOP.[29]
  93. Kitterman JA, Kantanie S, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. Iatrogenic harm caused by diagnostic errors in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics, 2005; 116: e654–661.
  94. Schaffer AA, Kaplan FS, Tracy MR, O'Brien ML, Dormans JP, Shore EM, Harland RM, Kusumi K. Developmental anomalies of the cervical spine in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva are distinctly different from those in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome: clues from the BMP signaling pathway. Spine, 2005; 30: 1379–1385.
  95. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM, Glaser DL, Carroll L, Delai P, FastnachtUrban E, Forman SJ, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hoover-Fong J, Koster B, Pauli RM, Reardon W, ZaidiSA, Zasloff M, Morhart R, Mundlos S, Groppe J, Shore EM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat, 2009; 30: 379–390.
  96. Mahboubi S, Glaser DL, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatr Radiol, 2001; 31: 307–314.
  97. Reinig JW, Hill SC, Fang M, Marini J, Zasloff MA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: CT appearance. Radiology, 1986; 159: 153–157.
  98. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F, Connor M, Kitterman J, Sillence D, Zackai E, Ravitsky V, Zasloff M, Ganguly A, Shore EM. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificansprogressiva. Pediatrics, 2008; 121: e1295-e1300.
  99. The International Clinical Consortium on FOP The Medical Management of FibrodysplasiaOssificans Progressiva: Current Treatment Considerations. Clin Proc Intl Clin Consort FOP, 2011; 4: 1–100.
  100. Haga N, Nakashima Y, Kitoh H, et al. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: review and research activities in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2020;62:3–13.
  101. Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38:525–7.
  102. Ramirez-Gonzalez A, Castañeda-de-la-Fuente A, Castro-Cervantes V, Pineda C, Sandoval H, Hidalgo-Bravo A. Fibrodysplasia (myositis) ossificans progressiva (FOP). Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:1929–30.
  103. Smilde BJ, Botman E, de Ruiter RD, et al. Monitoring and management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: current perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:113–20.
  104. Okuno T, Suzuki H, Inoue A, Kusukawa J. Restricted mandibular movement attributed to ossification of mandibular depressors and medial pterygoid muscles in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1891–8.
  105. Bocciardi R, Bordo D, Di Duca M, Di Rocco M, Ravazzolo R. Mutational analysis of the ACVR1 gene in Italian patients affected with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: confirmations and advancements. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:311–8.

Reference

  1. Tiwari V, Behera P, Sarawagi R, Rafi BM, Sahu S, Raj H, Rajpoot M. Atypical presentation of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2018;10(7).
  2. Moraes FB, Queiroz Filho AR, Silva LJ, Rocha VL, Araújo NP, Mendonça EQ, Almeida ÉP. Myositis ossificans progressiva: case report. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2012;47:394-6.
  3. Soldi? Ž, Murgi? J, Radi? J, Dabeli? N, Jazvi? M, Mari? Brozi? J, Kusi? Z. Radiation therapy in treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report and review of the literature. Collegium antropologicum. 2011 Jun 24;35(2):611-4. 
  4. Pignolo RJ, Bedford?Gay C, Liljesthröm M, Durbin?Johnson BP, Shore EM, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. The natural history of flare?ups in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a comprehensive global assessment. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2016 Mar 1;31(3):650-6.
  5. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  6. Kaplan, F. S. (2013). The skeleton in the closet. Gene, 528(1), 7–11.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.022

  1. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  2. Martelli, Anderson; Santos, Arnaldo Rodrigues (3 July 2014). "Cellular and morphological aspects of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Lessons of formation, repair, and bone bioengineering". Organogenesis. 10 (3): 303–311. doi:10.4161/org.29206. PMC 4750545. PMID 25482313.
  3. Kishan A B, Raghavendra K, Vikram M P, Harman S G. Stone Man Syndrome : A Case Report and Review of Literature. J Pub Health Med Res, 2014;2(2):47-51.
  4. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F et al. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(5):e1295-300. doi: 10.1542/ peds .2007-1980.
  5. Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat. 2009;30 (3):379-90. doi: 10.1002/humu.20868.
  6. Kan C, Ding N, Yang J, Tan Z, McGuire TL, Lu H, Zhang K, Berger DMP, Kessler JA, Kan L. BMP-dependent, injury-induced stem cell niche as a mechanism of heterotopic ossification. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jan 11;10(1):14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Repositioning in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Biomedicines. 2021 Feb 19;9(2) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Cappato S, Traberg R, Gintautiene J, Zara F, Boc Ciardi R. A case of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva associated with a novel variant of the ACVR1 gene. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1774. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Wu J, Ren B, Shi F, Hua P, Lin H. BMP and mTOR signaling in heterotopic ossification: Does their crosstalk provide therapeutic opportunities? J Cell Biochem. 2019 Aug;120(8):12108-12122. [PubMed]
  10. Twombly V, Bangi E, Le V, Malnic B, Singer MA, Wharton KA. Functional analysis of saxophone, the Drosophila gene encoding the BMP type I receptor ortholog of human ALK1/ACVRL1 and ACVR1/ALK2. Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):563-79, 1SI-8SI. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Kaplan FS, Tabas JA, Gannon FH, Finkel G, Hahn GV, Zasloff MA. The histopathology of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. An endochondral process. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):220-30. [PubMed]
  12. Shah ZA, Rausch S, Arif U, El Yafawi B. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (stone man syndrome): a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2019 Dec;13:1-5.
  13. Maiti D, Shilpa NM. " Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder with a Misguided Immune Response.
  14. . Clinical aspects and current therapeutic approaches for FOP. Kitoh H. Biomedicines. 2020;8:325. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: lessons learned from a rare disease. Akyuz G, Gencer-Atalay K, Ata P. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:716–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Current and emerging therapeutic options for the management of rare skeletal diseases. Semler O, Rehberg M, Mehdiani N, Jackels M, Hoyer-Kuhn H. Paediatr Drugs. 2019;21:95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prophylactic treatment of rapamycin ameliorates naturally developing and episode -induced heterotopic ossification in mice expressing human mutant ACVR1. Maekawa H, Kawai S, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: what have we achieved and where are we now? Follow-up to the 2015 Lorentz workshop. de Ruiter RD, Smilde BJ, Pals G, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:732728. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Challenges and opportunities for drug repositioning in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Ventura F, Williams E, Ikeya M, Bullock AN, Ten Dijke P, Goumans MJ, Sanchez-Duffhues G. Biomedicines. 2021;9:213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Current challenges and opportunities in the care of patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): an international, multi-stakeholder perspective. Pignolo RJ, Bedford-Gay C, Cali A, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: diagnosis, management, and therapeutic horizons. Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995352/ Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2013;10:437–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Recapitulation of pro-inflammatory signature of monocytes with ACVR1A mutation using FOP patient-derived iPSCs. Maekawa H, Jin Y, Nishio M, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cancer immunotherapies: from efficacy to resistance mechanisms - not only checkpoint matters. Wang S, Xie K, Liu T. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.690112/full. Front Immunol. 2021;12:690112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:651–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Macrophages in heterotopic ossification: from mechanisms to therapy. Huang Y, Wang X, Zhou D, Zhou W, Dai F, Lin H. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Modular fluorescent nanoparticle DNA probes for detection of peptides and proteins. Stawicki CM, Rinker TE, Burns M, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:19921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Mourdikoudis S, Pallares RM, Thanh NT. Nanoscale. 2018;10:12871–12934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hard targets for a second skeleton: therapeutic horizons for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Al Mukaddam MM, Shore EM. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. The stone man disease: fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: imaging revisited. Verma AK, Aga P, Singh SK, Singh R. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2022). Curcumin: A Review of Its Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties
  32. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ginger.
  33. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Boswellia.
  34. National Institute of Health. (2022). Ashwagandha.
  35. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2022). Ginkgo Biloba.
  36. -ACVR1 Mutational Analysis: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation and DNA sequence analysis were conducted according to standard techniques from genomic DNA obtained from routinevenipuncture. Genomic DNA was screened for mutations in ACVR1 by PCR amplification using primers that flank the recurrent c.617G>A mutation identified in patients with classic FOP.[29]
  37. Kitterman JA, Kantanie S, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. Iatrogenic harm caused by diagnostic errors in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics, 2005; 116: e654–661.
  38. Schaffer AA, Kaplan FS, Tracy MR, O'Brien ML, Dormans JP, Shore EM, Harland RM, Kusumi K. Developmental anomalies of the cervical spine in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva are distinctly different from those in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome: clues from the BMP signaling pathway. Spine, 2005; 30: 1379–1385.
  39. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM, Glaser DL, Carroll L, Delai P, FastnachtUrban E, Forman SJ, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hoover-Fong J, Koster B, Pauli RM, Reardon W, ZaidiSA, Zasloff M, Morhart R, Mundlos S, Groppe J, Shore EM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat, 2009; 30: 379–390.
  40. Mahboubi S, Glaser DL, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatr Radiol, 2001; 31: 307–314.
  41. Reinig JW, Hill SC, Fang M, Marini J, Zasloff MA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: CT appearance. Radiology, 1986; 159: 153–157.
  42. . Kaplan FS, Xu M, Glaser DL, Collins F, Connor M, Kitterman J, Sillence D, Zackai E, Ravitsky V, Zasloff M, Ganguly A, Shore EM. Early diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificansprogressiva. Pediatrics, 2008; 121: e1295-e1300.
  43. The International Clinical Consortium on FOP The Medical Management of FibrodysplasiaOssificans Progressiva: Current Treatment Considerations. Clin Proc Intl Clin Consort FOP, 2011; 4: 1–100.
  44. Haga N, Nakashima Y, Kitoh H, et al. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: review and research activities in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2020;62:3–13.
  45. Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38:525–7.
  46. Ramirez-Gonzalez A, Castañeda-de-la-Fuente A, Castro-Cervantes V, Pineda C, Sandoval H, Hidalgo-Bravo A. Fibrodysplasia (myositis) ossificans progressiva (FOP). Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:1929–30.
  47. Smilde BJ, Botman E, de Ruiter RD, et al. Monitoring and management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: current perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:113–20.
  48. Okuno T, Suzuki H, Inoue A, Kusukawa J. Restricted mandibular movement attributed to ossification of mandibular depressors and medial pterygoid muscles in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1891–8.
  49. Bocciardi R, Bordo D, Di Duca M, Di Rocco M, Ravazzolo R. Mutational analysis of the ACVR1 gene in Italian patients affected with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: confirmations and advancements. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:311–8.

Photo
Ravroop Singh
Corresponding author

St. Soldier Institute of Pharmacy, Lidhran Campus Behind NIT (R.E.C) Jalandhar- Amritsar byepass, NH-1, Jalandhar- 144011, Punjab, India

Photo
Rajesh Kumar
Co-author

St. Soldier Institute of Pharmacy, Lidhran Campus Behind NIT (R.E.C) Jalandhar- Amritsar byepass, NH-1, Jalandhar- 144011, Punjab, India

Photo
Ajeet Pal Singh
Co-author

St. Soldier Institute of Pharmacy, Lidhran Campus Behind NIT (R.E.C) Jalandhar- Amritsar byepass, NH-1, Jalandhar- 144011, Punjab, India

Photo
Amar Pal Singh
Co-author

St. Soldier Institute of Pharmacy, Lidhran Campus Behind NIT (R.E.C) Jalandhar- Amritsar byepass, NH-1, Jalandhar- 144011, Punjab, India

Photo
Gaurav Hastir
Co-author

St. Soldier Institute of Pharmacy, Lidhran Campus Behind NIT (R.E.C) Jalandhar- Amritsar byepass, NH-1, Jalandhar- 144011, Punjab, India

Ravroop Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Ajeet Pal Singh, Amar Pal Singh, Gaurav Hastir, Review Article on Stoneman Disease, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 7, 2122-2136, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21294580

More related articles
Herbal Therapeutic Approaches for Metabolic Dysfun...
Gautam Gundecha, Naziya Inamdar , Mitali Gandhi...
Nanoformulated Evaluation Extract of Momordica Cha...
Snega Boopathy, Neha, Vijay Kumar, Udayageethan L, Nilesh Saha, M...
Plant-Derived Anticancer Agents: From Traditional ...
Kavita Gaisamudre (Sarwade), Ayush Gaikar, Pooja Patra, Saurav Ku...
Pharmacological Management of Depression in the Modern Era: Established Therapie...
Rohit Kumar, Ayush Kamlakar Gaikar, Saurav Kumar, Nuri Farzina Rahman, Pooja Patra, Indresh Malakar,...
CDSCO Versus USFDA Regulatory Systems for API Registration and DMF Submission: A...
Amod Patil, Nitin Haswani, Pritam Jain, Omkar Shivalkar, Pranjali Lingalwar...
Nanoemulsion - Based Cosmeceuticals: Formulation Strategies and Quality by Desi...
Chinnaguravagari Saranya, Velpuri Nikitha lakshmi, Vothani Sarath Babu...
More related articles
Nanoformulated Evaluation Extract of Momordica Charantia and Mangifera Indica fo...
Snega Boopathy, Neha, Vijay Kumar, Udayageethan L, Nilesh Saha, Mohammed Aashik, Prerona Das...
Plant-Derived Anticancer Agents: From Traditional Medicine To Modern Therapeutic...
Kavita Gaisamudre (Sarwade), Ayush Gaikar, Pooja Patra, Saurav Kumar, Prasanjit Das, Mohammed Aashik...
Nanoformulated Evaluation Extract of Momordica Charantia and Mangifera Indica fo...
Snega Boopathy, Neha, Vijay Kumar, Udayageethan L, Nilesh Saha, Mohammed Aashik, Prerona Das...
Plant-Derived Anticancer Agents: From Traditional Medicine To Modern Therapeutic...
Kavita Gaisamudre (Sarwade), Ayush Gaikar, Pooja Patra, Saurav Kumar, Prasanjit Das, Mohammed Aashik...