View Article

Abstract

Fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs) have emerged as an innovative oral solid dosage form designed to disintegrate or dissolve rapidly in the mouth, typically within seconds, without the need for water. This drug delivery system enhances patient compliance, particularly among pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic populations, offering a convenient alternative to conventional tablets and capsules. The present review provides an extensive overview of the design and development of FDTs, emphasizing formulation strategies, disintegration mechanisms, preparation methods, and evaluation parameters. It also discusses the role of excipients, particularly superdisintegrants, in achieving rapid disintegration and optimal mouthfeel. Various manufacturing techniques such as direct compression, lyophilization, molding, sublimation, and novel nanotechnology-based approaches are described in detail. Recent advances including 3D printing, co-processed excipients, and the use of natural superdisintegrants are also explored. Challenges in formulation, packaging, and regulatory perspectives are addressed, along with future prospects such as personalized FDTs and green manufacturing. Overall, this review highlights the growing importance of FDTs in modern pharmaceutical technology as a patient-friendly, efficient, and market-driven oral drug delivery system.

Keywords

Fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs); Oral drug delivery; Superdisintegrants; Direct compression; Lyophilization; Patient compliance; Rapid dissolution; Taste masking; Nanotechnology; 3D printing; Formulation development; Evaluation parameters; Pharmaceutical technology

Introduction

× Popup Image

1.1       Definition and Concept of FDTs

Fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs), also known as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), are solid unit dosage forms that disintegrate or dissolve rapidly on the tongue without the need for water. Typically, disintegration occurs within 30 seconds to 2 minutes, releasing the drug into the saliva for subsequent swallowing and absorption (1–3). FDTs are particularly useful for drugs requiring rapid onset of action, such as analgesics, antiemetics, antipyretics, and cardiovascular drugs.

1.2       Historical Background and Evolution

The concept of fast disintegrating dosage forms was first introduced in the late 1970s by the company Zydis®, which pioneered the freeze-dried oral lyophilized tablet(4). Since then, numerous technological advancements have been made to improve tablet strength, taste masking, and stability. Over the decades, the technology has evolved from lyophilization-based systems to more cost-effective and scalable methods such as direct compression and spray drying(2,5,6).

1.3       Need and Significance in Modern Drug Delivery

FDTs address the growing demand for patient-centric drug delivery, particularly for populations facing difficulty swallowing traditional tablets and capsules. Studies indicate that up to 35% of the general population, including elderly and pediatric patients, experience dysphagia(7,8). Additionally, FDTs improve adherence in psychiatric and emergency settings, where immediate dosing is essential.

1.4       Advantages over Conventional Dosage Forms

Compared to conventional tablets, FDTs offer several distinct advantages:

  • Ease of administration: Can be taken without water, beneficial for travelers and bed-ridden patients.
  • Rapid onset of action: Faster absorption due to pre-gastric dissolution and absorption from the oral cavity(9,10).
  • Enhanced bioavailability: Some drugs show improved absorption due to avoidance of first-pass metabolism.
  • Improved patient compliance: Especially advantageous for pediatric and geriatric patients(11).
  • Versatility: Suitable for a wide range of drugs and therapeutic classes.

 

2.5 Market Potential and Regulatory Perspectives

The global FDT market is expanding rapidly due to increased patient demand and technological innovation. According to recent pharmaceutical market analyses, the FDT segment is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 10% in the coming years (12,13). Regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have defined FDTs as tablets that disintegrate within 30 seconds in the oral cavity. Compliance with ICH guidelines ensures product safety, stability, and efficacy (14,15).

3.         Ideal Characteristics of Fast Disintegrating Tablets

An ideal FDT should satisfy both patient-related and formulation-related requirements. The following characteristics define an optimized formulation (3,6,16,17):

  1. Rapid Disintegration: The tablet should disintegrate or dissolve completely within seconds (ideally <30 seconds) upon contact with saliva.
  2. Pleasant Mouthfeel and Taste: The formulation must mask any unpleasant taste of the drug to ensure patient acceptability.
  3. Adequate Mechanical Strength: Tablets should withstand handling, packaging, and transportation without breaking.
  4. Low Sensitivity to Environmental Factors: FDTs should be stable under normal temperature and humidity conditions.
  5. Compatibility with APIs and Excipients: Chemical stability between drug and excipients must be ensured through compatibility studies such as DSC or FTIR analysis.
  6. Non-irritant to Oral Mucosa: The formulation should not cause irritation or discomfort upon contact with the oral cavity.
  7. Ease of Manufacturing: The process should be simple, cost-effective, and scalable for commercial production.

The balance between mechanical integrity and rapid disintegration remains a key challenge in FDT formulation design.

4.         Formulation Aspects

The formulation of fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs) demands careful selection of both active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and excipients, to ensure fast disintegration, good mouthfeel, mechanical integrity, and drug stability(1,2,6,7).

4.1       Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)

The selection of a suitable API is the first step in designing an effective FDT. The key considerations include:

  • Dose and solubility: APIs with low to moderate doses (generally below 50 mg) and good aqueous solubility are preferable for FDT formulations to achieve rapid dissolution (2,8,10).
  • Taste and mouthfeel: Drugs with a bitter or unpleasant taste must be masked using flavoring agents, sweeteners, or polymeric coatings(3,11).
  • Chemical and physical stability: The API must remain stable during processing (compression, drying) and storage under ambient conditions.
  • Compatibility with excipients: Compatibility studies using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are essential to prevent chemical degradation or phase transformation (18,19).

4.2       Excipients

Excipients play a crucial role in determining the performance of FDTs. Their selection is based on desired disintegration time, tablet strength, taste masking, and process feasibility.

4.2.1    Superdisintegrants

Superdisintegrants are the backbone of FDT formulations. They promote rapid tablet disintegration by facilitating water uptake and swelling within the matrix. Common examples include:

  • Crospovidone (Polyplasdone® XL, XL-10): Works through capillary and wicking mechanisms.
  • Croscarmellose sodium (Ac-Di-Sol®): Exhibits both swelling and wicking properties.
  • Sodium starch glycolate (Explotab®, Primogel®): Rapidly swells 200–300 times its volume in water(4,6,11,15).
  • Natural superdisintegrants: Recent studies report the use of plant-derived agents such as Plantago ovata, Lepidium sativum, and Fenugreek mucilage as eco-friendly alternatives (20,21).

4.2.2    Diluents

Diluents add bulk and influence mouthfeel. Mannitol and xylitol impart a pleasant cooling sensation, while microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) enhances compressibility. Other common diluents include lactose, dicalcium phosphate, and sorbitol (3,6,14,16).

4.2.3    Binders

Binders ensure mechanical strength without excessively delaying disintegration. Common binders are polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and pregelatinized starch (9,17,22).

4.2.4    Lubricants

Lubricants minimize friction during compression and ejection. Magnesium stearate, talc, and sodium stearyl fumarate are widely used, but their concentration must be optimized since over-lubrication can retard disintegration (4,8,10).

4.2.5    Flavoring and Sweetening Agents

Taste masking is crucial for patient acceptability. Agents like aspartame, saccharin sodium, sucralose, and acesulfame potassium are common. Natural flavors such as mint, orange, and strawberry are added for palatability (12,16).

4.2.6    Saliva-Stimulating Agents

Acidic excipients such as citric acid and malic acid enhance saliva production and contribute to faster disintegration(7,15,23).

5.         Mechanism of Disintegration

The rapid disintegration of FDTs results from complex physicochemical interactions between tablet components and water.

•           The following mechanisms have been proposed (2,4,11,18,24):

  1. Swelling Mechanism: Superdisintegrants absorb water and swell, exerting pressure that leads to tablet rupture. Sodium starch glycolate and croscarmellose sodium primarily follow this mechanism.
  2. Capillary (Wicking) Mechanism: Water is drawn into the porous matrix by capillary action, weakening the intermolecular bonds between particles. Crospovidone mainly acts via wicking.
  3. Particle Repulsion Theory: Electrostatic repulsion among particles after wetting causes rapid dispersion.
  4. Enzymatic Action: Certain natural polymers may degrade enzymatically, leading to disintegration.
  5. Deformation and Recovery: During compression, disintegrant particles deform; upon contact with water, they recover to their original shape, contributing to breakup.

In practice, a combination of swelling and wicking mechanisms dominates most FDT formulations, ensuring optimal balance between strength and rapid disintegration.

 

Figure 1 : Mechanism of Disintegration

 

6.         Methods / Techniques for Preparation

A variety of manufacturing technologies are employed to produce FDTs, depending on the drug’s properties and desired disintegration profile(2,5,6,12,13,22,25).

6.1       Direct Compression

 

The most economical and widely used technique. It involves blending API, excipients, and superdisintegrants, followed by compression into tablets.

  • Advantages: Simplicity, low cost, scalability.
  • Limitations: Low mechanical strength for highly porous tablets; requires directly compressible excipients such as MCC and mannitol.

 

Figure 2: Direct Compression Method

 

6.2       Lyophilization (Freeze Drying)

In this method, a drug solution or suspension is frozen and the solvent sublimed under vacuum to create a porous matrix that dissolves rapidly in saliva.

  • Example: Zydis® technology.
  • Advantages: Extremely fast disintegration (<10 s).
  • Limitations: Expensive, fragile tablets, special packaging required.

 

 

Figure 3: Lyophilization Technique

 

6.3       Molding Method

Involves preparing a wet mass containing drug and excipients , which is molded into tablets and dried.

  • Advantages: Good mouthfeel and taste masking.
  • Limitations: Poor mechanical strength.

6.4       Sublimation Method

Volatile substances such as camphor, urea, or ammonium bicarbonate are incorporated into the mixture and later sublimed to create pores that accelerate disintegration(3,6,8).

6.5       Spray Drying

A solution containing API and excipients is sprayed into a hot chamber, forming porous, highly dispersible particles. Croscarmellose sodium, gelatin, and mannitol are commonly used in this method.

 

Figure 4: Spray Drying Method

 

6.6       Mass Extrusion

A soft mass of drug and excipients is extruded and cut into uniform segments. The method allows precise control of shape and uniformity (10,14).

6.7       Phase Transition Method

This approach involves using a combination of two sugar alcohols with different melting points; heating causes partial melting and recrystallization, enhancing strength while maintaining rapid disintegration (20).

6.8       Nanotechnology-Based Approaches

Recent developments include integrating drug nanocrystals or solid lipid nanoparticles

into FDTs to improve dissolution and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs (12,24).

7.         Evaluation Parameters

Evaluation of FDTs is a crucial step to ensure product performance, quality, and compliance with pharmacopeial standards. The evaluation parameters are generally classified into pre-formulation and post-formulation studies(2,4,8,10,16,23).

7.1       Pre-Formulation Studies

(a)       Flow Properties

Good flowability is necessary for uniform die filling during tablet compression. Flow properties are assessed through:

•           Angle of repose (θ): Indicates the internal friction between particles. A lower angle (<30°) denotes good flow.

Table 1 : Angle of Repose as an identification of powder flow Properties

Sr. No

Angle of Repose

Type Of Flow

1

<20

Excellent

2

20-30

Good

3

30-34

Passable

4

>34

Very Poor

  • Bulk and tapped density: Used to calculate Carr’s index and Hausner ratio, which indicate compressibility.
  • Compressibility index:

Carr’s Index = (Tapped−Bulk)/Tapped×100

  • Values below 15% suggest excellent flow(3,14,17).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Relationship between % compressibility and flow ability

 

% Compressibility

Flow ability

5-12

Excellent

12-16

Good

18-21

Fair Passable

23-35

             Poor

33-38

Very Poor

<40

Very Poor

 

  1. Compatibility Studies

Drug–excipient compatibility ensures chemical and physical stability. Common techniques include:

    • FTIR spectroscopy: Identifies potential interactions through peak shifts.
    • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): Detects changes in melting point or enthalpy.

•           X-ray   diffraction       (XRD):            Determines     crystalline       changes            in         the formulation(4,15,20).

7.2 Post-Formulation Studies

(a) Weight Variation

Twenty tablets are weighed individually, and the mean weight is compared with pharmacopeial limits (±5% for tablets >250 mg).

 

Table 3: Weight variation specification as per IP

Average Weight Of Tablet

% Deviation

80mg or less

+10

More than 80 mg but less than 250 mg

+7.5

250 mg or more

+5

 

(b)       Thickness and Diameter

Measured using a vernier caliper to ensure uniformity and compatibility with packaging materials.

(c)       Hardness

Determines the mechanical strength of tablets. Measured using a Monsanto or Pfizer hardness tester; ideal FDT hardness ranges between 2–4 skg/cm²(10,18).

      

 

 

 

  1. Friability

Evaluated using a Roche friabilator. A weight loss below 1% indicates adequate strength (2,11).

 

Figure 5: Friability Test Apparatus

  1. Wetting Time and Water Absorption Ratio

A tissue paper method is used to measure the time taken for water to reach the tablet surface. The water absorption ratio (R) is calculated as:

R=Wa−Wb/Wb×100

where, Wa and Wb are tablet weights before and after absorption.

  1. In-Vitro Disintegration Time

Measured in 900 mL of distilled water at 37°C ± 0.5°C using the disintegration apparatus. FDTs should disintegrate within 30 seconds to 3 minutes, depending on formulation(3,6,7).

  1. In-Vitro Dissolution Studies

Dissolution tests determine the rate and extent of drug release, typically performed usingUSP Type II (paddle) apparatus at 50–100 rpm in a suitable medium (9,13).

  1. Taste Evaluation and Mouthfeel

 

Performed using a trained human taste panel or electronic tongue technology. Criteria include taste, aftertaste, and mouthfeel(8,24).

  1. Stability Studies

Stability testing is conducted as per ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines at accelerated conditions (40°C ± 2°C and 75% RH ± 5%) for 6 months to evaluate any changes in appearance, disintegration time, or drug content (14,19).

  1. Packaging of FDTs

Because of their porous structure and hygroscopic nature, FDTs are sensitive to environmental factors, especially moisture and temperature. Hence, specialized packaging is essential to maintain stability(2,5,6,11,21).

    1. Moisture-Resistant Packaging

FDTs are commonly packed in:

  • Blister packs: Provide individual protection against moisture and mechanical stress.
  • Strip packs: Cost-effective alternative but offer less moisture protection compared to blisters.
  • Alu-Alu packs: Provide superior moisture and light resistance, ideal for hygroscopic drugs(8,10).
    1. Specialized Packaging Systems

Some FDT technologies utilize proprietary packaging, such as:

  • Zydis® (Catalent Pharma): Uses peelable foil blister packs.
  • OraSolv® and DuraSolv® (CIMA Labs): Employ moisture-resistant polymer blisters.

These packages prevent physical damage and ensure long-term stability under varying conditions (4,12,15).

  1. Applications of FDTs

FDTs have gained widespread acceptance due to their broad therapeutic applicability and patient-friendly nature(3,7,9,18,24).

  1. Pediatric Patients: Ideal for children who have difficulty swallowing conventional tablets.
  2. Geriatric Population: Facilitates administration for elderly patients suffering from dysphagia or neurological disorders.
  3. Psychiatric and Unconscious Patients: Enables rapid drug administration without water.
  4. Emergency Situations: Useful for conditions requiring quick onset of action, such as allergic reactions, nausea, and migraine attacks.
  5. Improved Bioavailability: Drugs absorbed in the oral cavity bypass first-pass metabolism, enhancing systemic availability (e.g., selegiline, propranolol).
  6. Convenience for Traveling and On-the-Go Use: Portable, easy to self-administer without water (10,14,17,19).
  1. Case Studies / Marketed Products

A number of FDT products have been successfully commercialized, showcasing the feasibility and benefits of this technology (6,8,13,22,25).

Table 4: Marketed Products

 

 

 

 

Key Insights from Marketed Formulations

  • Freeze-dried formulations offer the fastest disintegration but require costly packaging.
  • Direct compression-based products are more economical and robust.
  • Taste masking through polymer coating or complexation remains critical for patient compliance.
     

 

 

11. Challenges in Formulation of FDTs

Despite their wide acceptance and advantages, FDTs present several formulation and manufacturing challenges that must be carefully addressed(2,7,8,14,20).

    1. Mechanical Strength

Because of their porous and fragile structure, FDTs often exhibit low hardness and high friability. Achieving the right balance between fast disintegration and mechanical strength remains difficult. Optimizing compression force, binder concentration, and choice of excipients is critical.

    1. Taste Masking

Many active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) have an inherently bitter taste, which negatively impacts patient compliance. Techniques such as microencapsulation, complexation with ion-exchange resins, and polymer coating are essential for effective taste masking (6,10,17).

    1. Moisture Sensitivity

FDTs are hygroscopic due to the presence of superdisintegrants and porous excipients. Exposure to humidity may cause premature disintegration or structural damage, requiring specialized moisture-barrier packaging (3,11,23).

    1. Drug Loading Limitations

The dosage of drugs incorporated into FDTs is limited. Drugs requiring high doses (>500 mg) are challenging to formulate into FDTs due to size and disintegration constraints(13,15).

    1. Stability Issues

Lyophilized or moisture-sensitive formulations may exhibit reduced shelf life. Maintaining stability in varying climatic zones requires optimization of both formulation and packaging design(8,12,19).

  1. Recent Advances in FDT Technology

FDT technology has rapidly evolved with the integration of modern pharmaceutical and nanotechnological innovations (6,10,18,22,24).

    1. Nanotechnology-Based FDTs

Nanoparticles and nanocrystals enhance solubility and dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs.

 

Example: Nanonised aripiprazole FDTs exhibit faster onset of action and improved bioavailability.

    1. 3D Printing of FDTs

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) enables personalized dosage and complex geometries for controlled disintegration. The first FDA-approved 3D printed FDT, Spritam® (levetiracetam), set a milestone in 2015 for on-demand oral dosage fabrication (21).

    1. Co-Processed Excipients

Modern excipient systems such as Ludiflash®, Prosolv® ODT G2, and Pharmaburst® 500enhance flowability, compressibility, and mouthfeel simultaneously(11,23).

    1. Superdisintegrant Synergism

Combining disintegrants like crospovidone + sodium starch glycolate results in superior wetting and capillary action compared to individual agents (4,9,18).

    1. Sublimation and Foam Drying Innovations

Sublimation techniques using camphor, urea, or ammonium bicarbonate generate highly porous structures without compromising strength. Foam drying offers a rapid, solvent-free alternative for thermolabile drugs(20,24).

  1. Regulatory Aspects

Regulatory guidance for FDTs is derived from general oral solid dosage form requirements with additional criteria for disintegration and stability(2,8,13,14,25).

    1. Definition and Acceptance

The USFDA classifies FDTs under “orally disintegrating tablets” (ODTs), which disintegrate within 30 seconds or less in the mouth without water (FDA Guidance, 2008).

13.2     Pharmacopoeial Specifications

        • USP: FDTs should disintegrate within 30 seconds.
        • European Pharmacopoeia (EP): Defines “orodispersible tablets” as tablets that disintegrate within 3 minutes.
        • Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP): Adopts similar standards for disintegration, uniformity, and assay.

13.3     Labeling and Packaging

Labels must specify “orally disintegrating” and provide appropriate storage instructions (e.g., store in a dry place below 25°C). Packaging should ensure protection from light and moisture.

13.4     Bioequivalence Studies

In-vitro disintegration and dissolution studies, followed by in-vivo pharmacokinetic comparison, are mandatory to establish equivalence with reference products (12,19).

FUTURE PROSPECTS

The future of FDTs lies in integrating precision medicine, nanotechnology, and smart manufacturing to enhance therapeutic outcomes and patient convenience (3,10,17,20,21).

  1. Personalized FDTs: 3D printing and AI-driven modeling will enable custom dose strengths and multi-drug combinations.
  2. Fast-Onset Therapeutics: FDTs will expand into novel therapeutic areas like anti-epileptics, vaccines, and biologics through mucoadhesive and nano-enhanced systems.
  3. Natural Polymer Utilization: Biopolymers such as chitosan, guar gum, and aloe vera gel are being explored as sustainable disintegrants and binders.
  4. Regulatory Harmonization: Global guidelines are expected to standardize testing methods for ODTs/FDTs to facilitate international commercialization.
  5. Smart Packaging: Intelligent blister packs with humidity sensors may soon be used to maintain stability during distribution and storage.

CONCLUSION

Fast Disintegrating Tablets (FDTs) represent a breakthrough in oral drug delivery, merging patient-centric design with technological innovation. They offer rapid onset of action, improved compliance, and enhanced bioavailability, particularly for pediatric and geriatric patients. Despite formulation challenges such as moisture sensitivity and mechanical fragility, advancements in superdisintegrants, 3D printing, and nanotechnology continue to refine this dosage form. Future research should focus on optimizing taste masking, stability, and scalability to achieve globally acceptable standards. FDTs will continue to evolve as a cornerstone of patient-friendly, effective, and smart oral drug delivery systems.

REFERENCES

  1. Awasthi R, Sharma G, Dua K, Kulkarni GT. Fast disintegrating drug delivery systems: a review with special emphasis on fast disintegrating tablets. J Chronother Drug Deliv. 2013; 4(1):15–30.
  2. Badgujar BP, Mundada AS. The technologies used for developing orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Acta Pharm. 2011; 61:117-139.
  3. Beri C, Sacher I. Development of Fast Disintegration Tablets As Oral Drug Delivery System-A Review. Indian J Pharm Biol Res. 2013;1(3):96-99.
  4. Patidar A, Mishra P, Main P, Harsoliya MS, Agrawal S. A review on- recent advancement in the development of rapid disintegrating tablet. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res. 2011 Oct-Dec;1(1):7-16.
  5. Panda BP, Dey NS, Rao MEB. Development of innovative orally fast disintegrating film dosage forms: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol. 2012;5(2):1666–1674.
  6. Dinesh Kumar V, Sharma I, Sharma V. A comprehensive review on fast dissolving tablet technology. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(5):50-8.
  7. Parkash V, Maan S, Deepika, Yadav SK, Hemlata, Jogpal V. Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Tech Res. 2011;2(4):223-35.
  8. Joshi R, Garud N, Akram W. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2020;11(4):1562-70. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(4).1562-70.
  9. Masih A, Kumar A, Singh S, Tiwari AK. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2017 ;9(2):8-18.
  10. Ratnaparkhi MP, Mohanta GP, Upadhyay L. Review On: Fast Dissolving Tablet. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(1):5-12.
  11. Gupta A, Mishra AK, Gupta V, Bansal P, Singh R, Singh AK. Recent Trends of Fast Dissolving Tablet - An Overview of Formulation Technology. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2010 ;1(1):1-10.
  12. Awad HA, Fetouh MI, Sultan AA, El Maghraby GM. Fast-disintegrating tablets: a novel approach in pharmaceutical preparation. ERURJ. 2024;3(2):1151-72. doi:10.21608/ERURJ.2024.258720.1102.
  13. Kumar S, Garg SK. FAST DISSOLVING TABLETS (FDTs): CURRENT STATUS, NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES, RECENT ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. Int J Pharm Sci. 2014;6(7):22-35.
  14. Hirani JJ, Rathod DA, Vadalia KR. Orally Disintegrating Tablets: A Review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009; 8 (2):161-72.
  15. Chaturvedi AK, Verma A. Fast disintegrating tablet technology: newly prospects. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011; 2 (12):3046-50.
  16. Khan T, Nazim S, Shaikh S, Shaikh A, Khairnar A, Ahmed A. An approach for rapid disintegrating tablet: A review. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2011;3(3):170-83.
  17. Rangasamy M. Oral Disintegrating Tablets: A Future Compaction. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2009; 1(10):1-10.
  18. Pandey P, Dahiya M. Oral Disintegrating Tablets: A Review. Int J Pharm Res Rev. 2016; 5(1):50-62.
  19. Sharma D, Kumar D, Singh M, Singh G, Rathore MS. FAST DISINTEGRATING TABLETS: A NEW ERA IN NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM AND NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2012;2(3):74-86.
  20. Heer D, Aggarwal G, Kumar SLH. Recent trends of fast dissolving drug delivery system - an overview of formulation technology. Pharmacophore [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 Oct 13]; 4(1):1-9.
  21. Khanna K, Xavier G, Joshi SK, Patel A, Khanna S, Vipin, et al. Fast Dissolving Tablets-A Novel Approach. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2016;5(2):311-22.
  22. Yamuna B, Reshma T, Mahammed N. Quality by design (QbD) based approach for development of fast dissolving tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2023; 14(4):1642-48.

Reference

  1. Awasthi R, Sharma G, Dua K, Kulkarni GT. Fast disintegrating drug delivery systems: a review with special emphasis on fast disintegrating tablets. J Chronother Drug Deliv. 2013; 4(1):15–30.
  2. Badgujar BP, Mundada AS. The technologies used for developing orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Acta Pharm. 2011; 61:117-139.
  3. Beri C, Sacher I. Development of Fast Disintegration Tablets As Oral Drug Delivery System-A Review. Indian J Pharm Biol Res. 2013;1(3):96-99.
  4. Patidar A, Mishra P, Main P, Harsoliya MS, Agrawal S. A review on- recent advancement in the development of rapid disintegrating tablet. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res. 2011 Oct-Dec;1(1):7-16.
  5. Panda BP, Dey NS, Rao MEB. Development of innovative orally fast disintegrating film dosage forms: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol. 2012;5(2):1666–1674.
  6. Dinesh Kumar V, Sharma I, Sharma V. A comprehensive review on fast dissolving tablet technology. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(5):50-8.
  7. Parkash V, Maan S, Deepika, Yadav SK, Hemlata, Jogpal V. Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Tech Res. 2011;2(4):223-35.
  8. Joshi R, Garud N, Akram W. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2020;11(4):1562-70. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(4).1562-70.
  9. Masih A, Kumar A, Singh S, Tiwari AK. Fast dissolving tablets: A review. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2017 ;9(2):8-18.
  10. Ratnaparkhi MP, Mohanta GP, Upadhyay L. Review On: Fast Dissolving Tablet. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(1):5-12.
  11. Gupta A, Mishra AK, Gupta V, Bansal P, Singh R, Singh AK. Recent Trends of Fast Dissolving Tablet - An Overview of Formulation Technology. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2010 ;1(1):1-10.
  12. Awad HA, Fetouh MI, Sultan AA, El Maghraby GM. Fast-disintegrating tablets: a novel approach in pharmaceutical preparation. ERURJ. 2024;3(2):1151-72. doi:10.21608/ERURJ.2024.258720.1102.
  13. Kumar S, Garg SK. FAST DISSOLVING TABLETS (FDTs): CURRENT STATUS, NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES, RECENT ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. Int J Pharm Sci. 2014;6(7):22-35.
  14. Hirani JJ, Rathod DA, Vadalia KR. Orally Disintegrating Tablets: A Review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009; 8 (2):161-72.
  15. Chaturvedi AK, Verma A. Fast disintegrating tablet technology: newly prospects. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011; 2 (12):3046-50.
  16. Khan T, Nazim S, Shaikh S, Shaikh A, Khairnar A, Ahmed A. An approach for rapid disintegrating tablet: A review. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2011;3(3):170-83.
  17. Rangasamy M. Oral Disintegrating Tablets: A Future Compaction. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2009; 1(10):1-10.
  18. Pandey P, Dahiya M. Oral Disintegrating Tablets: A Review. Int J Pharm Res Rev. 2016; 5(1):50-62.
  19. Sharma D, Kumar D, Singh M, Singh G, Rathore MS. FAST DISINTEGRATING TABLETS: A NEW ERA IN NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM AND NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2012;2(3):74-86.
  20. Heer D, Aggarwal G, Kumar SLH. Recent trends of fast dissolving drug delivery system - an overview of formulation technology. Pharmacophore [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 Oct 13]; 4(1):1-9.
  21. Khanna K, Xavier G, Joshi SK, Patel A, Khanna S, Vipin, et al. Fast Dissolving Tablets-A Novel Approach. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2016;5(2):311-22.
  22. Yamuna B, Reshma T, Mahammed N. Quality by design (QbD) based approach for development of fast dissolving tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2023; 14(4):1642-48.
  23. Jain D, Amul M. A Review - Formulation & Development of Orodispersible Tablet. Int J Pharm Erud. 2012;2(3):1-6.
  24. Raj G P, Bhavya G, Vardhana M G H, Gowda H U J. A Review of Formulation Techniques and Evaluation Parameters of Fast Dissolving Tablets. J Pharma Insight Res. 2024;2(4):212-7.
  25. Siddiqui MN, Garg G, Sharma P K. Fast dissolving tablets: Preparation, characterization and evaluation: An overview. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;4(2):Article 015

Photo
Neha Pandit
Corresponding author

Srinath College Of Pharmacy

Photo
Monika Madibone
Co-author

Srinath college of Pharmacy

Photo
Rupali Pathre
Co-author

Srinath College Of Pharmacy

Photo
Manas Nikam
Co-author

Srinath college of Pharmacy

Photo
Akash Navpute
Co-author

Srinath College Of Pharmacy

Neha Pandit, Monika Madibone, Rupali Pathre, Manas Nikam, Akash Navpute Review On Fast Disintegrating Tablets, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 7879-7892, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20443960

More related articles
Development And Evaluation of A Polyherbal Multipu...
Mokshada Kashid, Tushar Shelke, Ashwini Jadhav, Tejaswi Kadam, Ku...
Development And Evaluation Of Polyherbal Anthelmin...
Namita Sagavekar , Deepak Bhujbal , Yuvraj Chavan , Sangram Dahip...
Evaluation of Hepatoprotective Effect of Pluchea W...
Shyam Bihari, Rajesh Asija, Richa Agarwal...
Standardization and Biological Evaluation of Bauhinia variegata Bark: Anthelmint...
Shashi Pal , Shvet Rana, Tania Sharma, Priyanka Rana, Sakshi Guleria, Vanshaj Guleria...
Formulation, Characterization, and In Vivo Evaluation of Telmisartan–L- Argini...
Isha Bhopale , Pooja Gawandar , Sanika Shinde, Akansha Jadhao, Kiran Lokhande, Anisha Tayade...
Intranasal Mucoadhesive Nanocarriers for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery: Mechanisti...
Bipul Nath, Parampara Barman , Kamal Deka, Swagata Chetia...
Related Articles
In Silico Design and Identification of Novel Thiazolidinedione Derivatives as PP...
Soumallya Chakraborty, Sayoni Roy, Swastika Mukherjee, Somenath Bhattacharya, ...
In silico Analysis of Strychnos potatorum Linn. On Clinical Targets of Type 2 Di...
Suchindra R, Prajwal Sanakyanavar , Surabhi Gopal, Arya J P, Vinaykumar Kadibagil, Ravisha N...
Development And Evaluation of A Polyherbal Multipurpose Hair Mask for Enhanced H...
Mokshada Kashid, Tushar Shelke, Ashwini Jadhav, Tejaswi Kadam, Kundan Kale, Gargi Kale...
More related articles
Development And Evaluation of A Polyherbal Multipurpose Hair Mask for Enhanced H...
Mokshada Kashid, Tushar Shelke, Ashwini Jadhav, Tejaswi Kadam, Kundan Kale, Gargi Kale...
Development And Evaluation Of Polyherbal Anthelminthic Gummy Candies Containing ...
Namita Sagavekar , Deepak Bhujbal , Yuvraj Chavan , Sangram Dahiphale , Mrunmayi Bhise ...
Development And Evaluation of A Polyherbal Multipurpose Hair Mask for Enhanced H...
Mokshada Kashid, Tushar Shelke, Ashwini Jadhav, Tejaswi Kadam, Kundan Kale, Gargi Kale...
Development And Evaluation Of Polyherbal Anthelminthic Gummy Candies Containing ...
Namita Sagavekar , Deepak Bhujbal , Yuvraj Chavan , Sangram Dahiphale , Mrunmayi Bhise ...