View Article

Abstract

Microneedle-assisted transdermal drug delivery has emerged as an innovative platform for the administration of biologics and vaccines, overcoming many limitations associated with traditional injectable methods.[1,2,3,20,26] These systems consist of microscopic needle arrays engineered to create transient microchannels across the stratum corneum without stimulating deeper pain receptors, thereby enabling painless and efficient delivery. By facilit and conventional parenteral administration. This approach enhances patient comfort, increases adherence to therapy, and minimizes dependence on skilled healthcare professionals.Technological advancements have led to diverse microneedle designs, including solid, drug-coated, dissolving, and hydrogel-forming systems, each developed to achieve precise control over drug loading, release behavior, and immune activation. Progress in biomaterials research—particularly the development of biocompatible polymers and stimuli-responsive hydrogels—has improved formulation stability and enabled sustained or programmable release of sensitive proteins and vaccine antigens.[12,13,17,25] Furthermore, integration with wearable technologies and smart monitoring tools offers opportunities for real-time feedback and individualized dosing.Preclinical investigations and early-phase clinical trials indicate that this vaccines can elicit strong and sometimes superior immune responses compared with conventional injections.[4,10,11,21] The possibility of self-administration also presents a significant advantage for expanding access to essential biologics, especially in resource-limited regions. With ongoing refinement in regulatory frameworks and scalable manufacturing strategies,it is a positioned to transform pain-free therapeutic administration and enhance the global reach of biologic and vaccine interventions.

Keywords

Microneedle arrays, Transdermal drug delivery , Biologics ,Vaccine delivery ,Dissolving microneedles ,Hydrogel-forming microneedles ,Controlled release systems ,Immunogenicity enhancement ,Painless drug administration ,Self-administration technologies ,Skin-targeted immunization ,Advanced biomaterials

Introduction

Biologic therapeutics and vaccines have significantly advanced contemporary medicine by providing targeted approaches for disease prevention and management. Despite their clinical importance, administration of these agents still primarily relies on conventional hypodermic injections.[1,2,20] Such methods are frequently associated with discomfort, needle anxiety, accidental needle-stick injuries, strict cold-chain requirements, and dependence on skilled healthcare providers. In addition, the considerable molecular weight and structural sensitivity of proteins, peptides, and nucleic acid–based vaccines restrict their delivery through traditional transderal routes, as the stratum corneum acts as an effective barrier against macromolecular penetration.[5,18,26] These limitations have driven the exploration of alternative, minimally invasive delivery technologies that enhance patient convenience and safety. Microneedle-mediated transdermal systems have emerged as an innovative strategy to address these challenges. By forming transient microchannels within the outer skin layer without activating deeper nociceptors, microneedles enable painless and efficient deposition of biologics into the viable epidermis and dermis. [1,3,9]These skin layers are abundant in antigen-presenting cells, which can amplify immune activation when vaccines are administered via this route.[7,18,19] Based on structural design and material selection, microneedles can be engineered as solid, coated, dissolvable, hollow, or hydrogel-forming configurations, allowing precise modulation of dose delivery and release profiles.[3,6,17,23,24] Advancements in polymer science, microfabrication technologies, and formulation optimization have further enhanced the stability, loading capacity, and therapeutic performance of delicate biologic molecules. Consequently, microneedle-based platforms are gaining recognition as transformative systems capable of facilitating pain-free, self-administered, and widely accessible treatments, particularly advantageous for mass immunization campaigns and long-term management of chronic disorders.[2,10,21,26]

2. Skin Anatomy and Barrier Function

The skin is a complex, multilayered organ that serves as the primary protective interface between the body and the external environment. Structurally, it is composed of three principal layers: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. The outermost epidermis consists of stratified keratinized epithelium and is further subdivided into the stratum basale, spinosum, granulosum, lucidum (in thick skin), and stratum corneum. Among these, the stratum corneum plays the most critical role in transdermal drug delivery. It is formed by terminally differentiated keratinocytes embedded within a highly organized lipid matrix, often described as a “brick-and-mortar” arrangement. This dense lipid architecture severely restricts the diffusion of hydrophilic molecules and macromolecules such as proteins, peptides, and vaccine antigens. Beneath the epidermis lies the dermis, a connective tissue layer rich in collagen, elastin fibers, blood vessels, lymphatics, and immune cells including Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells. These immune-active components are particularly relevant for vaccine delivery, as they facilitate antigen recognition and immune activation. The hypodermis, composed mainly of adipose tissue, provides structural support and thermal insulation. The barrier function of the skin is primarily attributed to the stratum corneum’s low permeability and tight lipid organization, which prevent water loss and block pathogen entry. While this protective role is essential for physiological homeostasis, it also limits the passive transport of large biologics. Microneedle systems overcome this constraint by creating transient microchannels[1,8,9] that bypass the stratum corneum, enabling efficient and minimally invasive delivery of therapeutic macromolecules into immunologically responsive skin layers.[5,18,20,26] Molecules larger than 500 Daltons face significant resistance due to lipid bilayer organization in corneocytes.[20,26] Biologics such as peptides, proteins, monoclonal antibodies, and nucleic acid vaccines require mechanical enhancement strategies for delivery.

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: Structural organization of human skin layers                                                                                                                    

 

 

 

 

3. Types of Microneedles

  1. Solid Microneedles

Concept- Solid microneedles are compact,non-hollow projections fabricated from materials  similar as silicon, stainless steel, titanium, or polymers. They're primarily used in the “ poke- and- patch ” approach. First, the microneedle array is pressed into the skin to  produce  flash microchannels. After discarding, a topical  medicine formulation( gel, cream, or patch) is applied over the treated  point, allowing the  medicine to diffuse through the created pores.

 Mechanism

 

 

 

Insertion of Solid Microneedle Array

Creation of TemporaryMicro-pores

Removal of Microneedle Device

use of medicine Formulation Over Treated Area

medicine Diffuses Through Microchannels

medicine Reaches feasible Epidermis/ Dermis

Systemic or Original

 

remedial Action[1,3,8,9]

 

 Crucial Features

  • Do n't contain  medicine within the needle structure
  • produce temporary microconduits in the stratum corneum
  • Suitable for hydrophilic and high- molecular- weight compounds

 Advantages

  • Simple design and fabrication
  • High mechanical strength
  • Controlled pore formation

 Limitations

  • Requires a two- step application
  • Risk of infection if not handled  correctly

 Indications

  • Insulin permeation  improvement, vaccine priming, cosmetic treatments

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Coated Microneedles

Concept- Coated microneedles contains of solid microneedles whose  shells are concentrated with a thin film of  medicine formulation. Upon insertion into the skin, the coating dissolves  quickly, releasing the  medicine directly into epidermal or dermal layers.

 Mechanism

 

 

Insertion of medicine-  covered Microneedle

Contact with Interstitial Fluid

Rapid Dissolution of Drug Coating

Direct Deposit of medicine into Skin Layers

medicine Diffusion into Capillary Network

Pharmacological Response

 

 Crucial Features

  • medicine is applied as a  face coating
  • Rapid dissolution after insertion
  • Suitable for potent  medicines  taking low boluses

 Advantages

  • One- step administration
  • Rapid onset of action
  • Reduced  medicine  loss

 Limitations

  • Limited  medicine  lading capacity
  • Livery coating may be technically difficult[6,22]

 Indication

  • Influenza vaccination, hormonal delivery, original anesthetics

 

 

 

 

3. Dissolving (Biodegradable) Microneedles

Concept- Dissolving microneedles are fabricated entirely from water- solvable or biodegradable polymers( e.g., PVP, PVA, hyaluronic acid) that encases the medicine within the needle matrix. After insertion, the microneedles dissolve in interstitial fluid, releasing the medicament in a controlled manner.

Mechanism

 

Insertion of Polymer- Depended Microneedle

immersion of Interstitial Fluid by Polymer Matrix

Gradual Dissolution of Microneedle Structure

Controlled Release of Encapsulated Drug

medicine Diffusion in Dermal Tissue

Sustained remedial    Effect

 

Crucial Features

  • medicine incorporated within the polymer matrix
  • Needles dissolve fully in skin
  • No sharp biohazardous waste

Advantages

  • Safe and free from pain
  • Eliminates needle disposal concerns
  • Suitable for vaccines and biologics

Limitations

  • Mechanical strength may be less than metal needles[4,12,24]
  • medicine stability must be maintained during fabrication

Indications

  • Protein and peptide delivery
  • DNA and mRNA vaccines
  • Cosmetic active composites[4,10,16]

 

 

 

 

4. Hollow Microneedles

Concept- Hollow microneedles function also to atomic hypodermic needles. They contain a central drag that allows liquid medicine phrasings to flow directly into the dermal microcirculation, either through unresistant prolixity or controlled infusion.

Mechanism

 

Insertion of Hollow Microneedle into Skin

Connection to Drug Reservoir or Syringe

Controlled Infusion of Liquid Drug

Direct Delivery into Dermal Microcirculation

Rapid Systemic Distribution

Immediate Pharmacological Effect

 

crucial Features

  • Internal lumen for fluid transport
  • Can deliver larger volumes than carpeted or dissolving types
  • Allow precise cure control

Advantages

  • Suitable for high- cure or rapid-fire systemic delivery
  • Immediate pharmacological effect
  • malleable infusion rates

Limitations

  • More complex fabrication
  • threat of congesting
  • Advanced manufacturing cost

Applications

  • Insulin administration
  • Emergency medicine delivery
  • Local anesthesia[23]

 

 

 

 

5. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles

Concept- Hydrogel- forming microneedles are composed ofcross-linked polymer networks. Upon insertion into the skin, they absorb interstitial fluid and swell, forming nonstop channels between a medicine- containing patch force and the dermal microcirculation. The medicine itself is n't bedded in the needles but diffuses through the blown hydrogel matrix.[17]

Mechanism

 

Insertion ofCross-Linked Hydrogel Microneedle

immersion of Interstitial Fluid

lump of Polymer Network

Formation of nonstop Diffusion Pathway

Drug Movement from Attached Reservoir

Sustained medicine Transport into Dermis

extended remedial Activity

 

Crucial Features

  • Swell without dissolving
  • Function as controlled- release conduits
  • Removed complete after use

Advantages

  • Controlled and sustained release[13,17]
  • Suitable for long- duration remedy
  • Reduced polymer residue in skin

Limitations

  • Slower onset compared to dissolving typ
  • Requires optimized polymercross-linking

Applications

  • habitual complaint remedy
  • delivery of macromolecules* individual fluid birth

 

 

 

 

4. Materials and Fabrication Techniques

Common fabrication materials include stainless steel, silicon, polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and carbohydrate matrices such as trehalose.[9,13,17,24,26] Micro-molding remains the most scalable fabrication method for polymeric microneedles. Photolithography and etching are used for silicon microneedles, while 3D printing enables customizable geometries.

5. Mechanism of Action

 

Apply of Microneedle Patch

Microneedle Penetrates Stratum Corneum

Formation of Controlled Microchannels

Bypass of Skin Barrier ( Stratum Corneum)

medicine Deposit in Epidermis/ Dermis

Diffusion into Interstitial Fluid

Absorbed into Original Tissue or Systemic blood

Therapeutic Effect.[1,8,20,26]

 

6. Delivery of Biologics

Microneedle systems enhance bioavailability by bypassing gastrointestinal degradation and hepatic first-pass metabolism.[2,3,20,26]

Protein stabilization strategies[12,25] include incorporation of disaccharides and lyophilization-compatible polymers.

Sustained release[13,17] kinetics can be engineered through biodegradable matrices.

7. Delivery of Vaccines

Intradermal vaccination improves antigen presentation and immune activation.[7,18,19]

Microneedle patches can induce both humoral and cellular immune responses.[4,10,21]

Emerging research focuses on mRNA vaccines[16] and thermostable formulations.

8. Pharmacokinetics and Immunological Response

Drug absorption depends on microneedle geometry, insertion force, and dissolution kinetics.[1,8,9] Immune activation involves antigen processing, MHC presentation, and T-cell proliferation.[7,18,19]

9. Safety and Patient Compliance

Microneedle systems are considered a safe and patient-friendly alternative to conventional hypodermic injections because they are specifically engineered to penetrate only the outermost layer of the skin without reaching deeper pain receptors or major blood vessels. Due to their microscopic length, microneedles create controlled and superficial microchannels in the stratum corneum, which significantly reduces pain, bleeding, and tissue trauma. Most users report only mild pressure or a slight tingling sensation during application. The microchannels formed during insertion naturally close within a short period, which lowers the risk of infection when proper hygiene is maintained. Furthermore, dissolving and hydrogel-forming microneedles eliminate the generation of sharp medical waste, thereby reducing accidental needle-stick injuries and improving overall procedural safety. The materials used in fabrication—such as medical-grade metals, biodegradable polymers, and biocompatible hydrogels—are selected to ensure minimal toxicity, low irritation potential, and safe degradation within the skin.[8,11,21,27] From a patient compliance perspective, microneedles offer substantial advantages that improve treatment adherence. Their painless and minimally invasive nature reduces needle phobia, a common barrier to vaccination and chronic injectable therapies. The patch-based format allows simple and convenient self-administration without the need for trained healthcare professionals, decreasing hospital visits and healthcare costs. Because microneedle patches are discreet and easy to use, patients can maintain their daily activities during treatment, enhancing comfort and convenience. In vaccination and long-term therapies such as insulin or hormone delivery, the reduced discomfort and simplified application process lead to greater patient satisfaction and higher adherence rates. Overall, the combination of enhanced safety, reduced anxiety, ease of use, and improved comfort makes microneedle technology a highly promising strategy for increasing both therapeutic effectiveness and patient compliance in modern drug delivery systems.[10,11,21,27]

10. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Challenges include limited drug loading capacity, large-scale manufacturing, and long-term biologic stability.[9,25,26] Microneedle-assisted transdermal delivery of biologics and vaccines is expected to advance through the development of smart, stimuli-responsive systems capable of controlled and sustained release[13,15]. Future platforms may integrate biosensors for real-time monitoring of therapeutic response, enabling personalized dosing strategies.[16] Innovations in biodegradable and mechanically robust materials will expand the range of deliverable macromolecules while maintaining safety. Scalable manufacturing techniques such as microfabrication and 3D printing will improve affordability and global accessibility.[9,26] Additionally, combination delivery approaches incorporating adjuvants or immunomodulators may enhance immune responses, positioning microneedles as a transformative technology for painless, patient-centered therapeutics.

CONCLUSION

Microneedle-assisted transdermal systems represent a paradigm shift in painless biologic and vaccine delivery. Continued advancements in materials science, immunology, and pharmaceutical engineering will accelerate clinical translation.

REFERENCES

  1. Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:581–587.
  2. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1547–1568.
  3. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Woolfson AD. Microneedle-based drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2010;147:333–342.
  4. Sullivan SP, et al. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat Med. 2010;16:915–920.
  5. Ita K. Transdermal delivery of vaccines. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;32:132–138.
  6. Gill HS, Prausnitz MR. Coating formulations for microneedles. J Control Release. 2007;117:227–237.
  7. Kim YC, Quan FS, Yoo DG, et al. Enhanced memory responses by skin vaccination. J Virol. 2010;84:7760–7769.
  8. Kalluri H, Banga AK. Formation and closure of microchannels. Pharm Res. 2011;28:82–94.
  9. Larrañeta E, et al. Microneedles: A new frontier. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1055–1073.
  10. Rouphael NG, et al. Immunogenicity of microneedle influenza vaccine. Lancet. 2017;390:649–658.
  11. Arya J, et al. Tolerability of microneedle patches. Vaccine. 2017;35:1456–1462.
  12. Kim YC, et al. Stability of influenza vaccine in microneedles. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8732–8741.
  13. DeMuth PC, et al. Polymer multilayer microneedles. Nat Mater. 2013;12:367–376.
  14. Li W, et al. Nanoparticle-loaded microneedles. ACS Nano. 2018;12:1378–1393.
  15. Ye Y, et al. Glucose-responsive microneedles. Nat Biomed Eng. 2016;1:0005.
  16. Zhang Y, et al. mRNA vaccine delivery via microneedles. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1905927.
  17. Donnelly RF, et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedles. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:4879–4890.
  18. Birchall JC, et al. Skin immune responses. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:885–898.
  19. Kim YC, et al. Skin vaccination advances. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;28:102–108.
  20. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1261–1268.
  21. Norman JJ, et al. Microneedle patch vaccination. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:636–638.
  22. Vrdoljak A, et al. Coated microneedle immunization. Vaccine. 2012;30:5058–5067.
  23. Wang PM, et al. Hollow microneedle systems. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1080–1087.
  24. Lee K, et al. Biodegradable microneedles. J Control Release. 2008;132:166–173.
  25. Mistilis MJ, et al. Long-term stability of microneedle vaccines. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:105–112.
  26. van der Maaden K, Jiskoot W, Bouwstra J. Microneedle technologies for (trans)dermal drug and vaccine delivery. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):645-655.
  27. Quinn HL, Hughes CM, Donnelly RF. In vivo and qualitative studies investigating the translational potential of microneedles for use in the older population. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(2):307–16.

Reference

  1. Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:581–587.
  2. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1547–1568.
  3. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Woolfson AD. Microneedle-based drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2010;147:333–342.
  4. Sullivan SP, et al. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat Med. 2010;16:915–920.
  5. Ita K. Transdermal delivery of vaccines. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;32:132–138.
  6. Gill HS, Prausnitz MR. Coating formulations for microneedles. J Control Release. 2007;117:227–237.
  7. Kim YC, Quan FS, Yoo DG, et al. Enhanced memory responses by skin vaccination. J Virol. 2010;84:7760–7769.
  8. Kalluri H, Banga AK. Formation and closure of microchannels. Pharm Res. 2011;28:82–94.
  9. Larrañeta E, et al. Microneedles: A new frontier. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1055–1073.
  10. Rouphael NG, et al. Immunogenicity of microneedle influenza vaccine. Lancet. 2017;390:649–658.
  11. Arya J, et al. Tolerability of microneedle patches. Vaccine. 2017;35:1456–1462.
  12. Kim YC, et al. Stability of influenza vaccine in microneedles. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8732–8741.
  13. DeMuth PC, et al. Polymer multilayer microneedles. Nat Mater. 2013;12:367–376.
  14. Li W, et al. Nanoparticle-loaded microneedles. ACS Nano. 2018;12:1378–1393.
  15. Ye Y, et al. Glucose-responsive microneedles. Nat Biomed Eng. 2016;1:0005.
  16. Zhang Y, et al. mRNA vaccine delivery via microneedles. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1905927.
  17. Donnelly RF, et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedles. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:4879–4890.
  18. Birchall JC, et al. Skin immune responses. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:885–898.
  19. Kim YC, et al. Skin vaccination advances. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;28:102–108.
  20. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1261–1268.
  21. Norman JJ, et al. Microneedle patch vaccination. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:636–638.
  22. Vrdoljak A, et al. Coated microneedle immunization. Vaccine. 2012;30:5058–5067.
  23. Wang PM, et al. Hollow microneedle systems. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1080–1087.
  24. Lee K, et al. Biodegradable microneedles. J Control Release. 2008;132:166–173.
  25. Mistilis MJ, et al. Long-term stability of microneedle vaccines. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:105–112.
  26. van der Maaden K, Jiskoot W, Bouwstra J. Microneedle technologies for (trans)dermal drug and vaccine delivery. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):645-655.
  27. Quinn HL, Hughes CM, Donnelly RF. In vivo and qualitative studies investigating the translational potential of microneedles for use in the older population. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(2):307–16.

Photo
Sanskruti Abnave
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Poona District Education. Associations Seth Govind Raghunath Sable College of Pharmacy, Saswad..

Photo
Pooja Choudhari
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Poona District Education. Associations Seth Govind Raghunath Sable College of Pharmacy, Saswad..

Photo
Rushikesh Bhagat
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Poona District Education. Associations Seth Govind Raghunath Sable College of Pharmacy, Saswad..

Photo
Pranav Bhosle
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Poona District Education. Associations Seth Govind Raghunath Sable College of Pharmacy, Saswad..

Photo
Ankita Javalkar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacology, Poona District Education. Associations Seth Govind Raghunath Sable College of Pharmacy, Saswad..

Sanskruti Abnave, Pooja Choudhari, Rushikesh Bhagat, Pranav Bhosle, Ankita Javalkar, Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery of Biologics and Vaccines: Emerging Technologies Enabling Painless and Patient-Centric Therapeutics, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 2, 3033-3043. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18697953

More related articles
Formulation & Evaluation of Phytopharmaceutical St...
Dr. Gourishankar Birtia, Diksha Dilliwar, Anjali Sahu, Tilak Kuma...
A Review on Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery System...
Satpute pratibha , Pawar Harshada, Rode Nikita, Nalage Nikita, ...
Comparative Analysis of Anticoagulant Activity in ...
Bhuvana Ezhil Rohini R., Abishake S., Subhalakshmi R., Devadharsh...
Related Articles
Antidiabetic Activity of Aegle Marmelous and Its Relationship with Its Antioxida...
Sanika Nigude, Aarti Avhad, Pradnya Datir, Diksha Bande, Onkar Gunjal, Vinod Pawar, ...
Overview Blackberry (Rubus Fruticosus) in Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus...
Ravina Khandekar, Unnati Patil, Monali Gangurde, Darshan Shejwal, Aarya Gawali, Snehal Ukhade, ...
Nanotechnology in Industrial Pharmacy: Applications in Drug Delivery Systems...
Aditya Palandurkar, Pankaj Fitwe, Dr. Shivshankar Mhaske, Shivali Khandarkar, Shivani Chavan, Radhes...
Formulation & Evaluation of Phytopharmaceutical Stick Based on Tectona grandis f...
Dr. Gourishankar Birtia, Diksha Dilliwar, Anjali Sahu, Tilak Kumar Sinha, Dron Kumar Sahu, ...
More related articles
Formulation & Evaluation of Phytopharmaceutical Stick Based on Tectona grandis f...
Dr. Gourishankar Birtia, Diksha Dilliwar, Anjali Sahu, Tilak Kumar Sinha, Dron Kumar Sahu, ...
A Review on Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery System...
Satpute pratibha , Pawar Harshada, Rode Nikita, Nalage Nikita, ...
Comparative Analysis of Anticoagulant Activity in Dipteryx Odorata (Tonka Bean) ...
Bhuvana Ezhil Rohini R., Abishake S., Subhalakshmi R., Devadharshini M., Kirankumar R. , ...
Formulation & Evaluation of Phytopharmaceutical Stick Based on Tectona grandis f...
Dr. Gourishankar Birtia, Diksha Dilliwar, Anjali Sahu, Tilak Kumar Sinha, Dron Kumar Sahu, ...
A Review on Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery System...
Satpute pratibha , Pawar Harshada, Rode Nikita, Nalage Nikita, ...
Comparative Analysis of Anticoagulant Activity in Dipteryx Odorata (Tonka Bean) ...
Bhuvana Ezhil Rohini R., Abishake S., Subhalakshmi R., Devadharshini M., Kirankumar R. , ...