View Article

  • Bioactive Compounds Extraction and Analysis of Ginger: A Study of Zingiber officinale

  • Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, Kolhapur-416213, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

This study examines the properties and extraction techniques of Zingiber officinale, also referred to as ginger, a member of the Zingiberaceae family. It also uses Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine the bioactive chemical composition of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) after Soxhlet extraction with methanol. The plant, which is mostly grown in Southeast Asia, is known for its unique taste, smell, and therapeutic qualities because of its bioactive components, including shogaol and gingerol. The investigation effectively detects and measures a number of phytochemicals found in the ginger rhizome, identifying 45 different compounds in all, including widely recognized ones like hexadecane, terpineol, and gingerol. The study explains the Soxhlet extraction process for separating these substances, emphasizing how successful and efficient it is in comparison to other extraction methods. A wide variety of phytochemicals are revealed when the chemical components of ginger extracts are analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The findings show that ginger has strong anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and immunomodulatory qualities, making it a useful herbal remedy with few adverse effects. The promise of ginger as a source of health-promoting bioactive chemicals is highlighted overall by this study, which also highlights the need for improved extraction methods to increase phytoconstituent production and analysis.

Keywords

Ginger, Zingiberaceae, Soxhlet Extraction, GC-MS, Anti-Inflammatory.

Introduction

× Popup Image

The herbaceous tropical perennial Zingiber officinale, a member of the Zingiberaceae family, yields ginger from its subterranean stems or rhizomes. A member of the Zingiberaceae family, Zingiber officinale Roscoe is a thin perennial herb that grows up to two feet tall. It has greenish yellow flowers that look like orchids. The meaty and spicy rhizome can be white, yellowish, brown, or branching. The narrow or linear-lanceolate leaves can reach a length of 20 cm and a width of 1.5 to 2 cm. The volatile oils, which are the medicinally active compounds that give ginger its distinct flavor and odor, can make up as much as 1 to 4 percent of the dried rhizome. Blooms are formed in dense clusters and are yellow-green with purple ends. Many different types of plants can be found throughout Southeast Asia. (2,3) Ginger contains turmeric and cardamom. The strong aroma of ginger is a result of strong ketones like gingerol, the extract most frequently used in studies. The part of the ginger plant that is consumed is the rhizome, sometimes referred to as "ginger root," But that's not a root. The plant's horizontal stem that sprouts roots is called the rhizome.(4,5)

Bioactive Compounds of Ginger :

Several components in ginger, Althoughshogaols, the main byproducts of gingerol dehydration, are more prevalent in dried ginger, gingerols, the main elements of fresh ginger, are greatly diminished. (7) Methanolic crude extracts of fresh ginger rhizomes have been discovered to contain at least 31 compounds related to gingerol.(8)1-Propanol, 2-ethoxy- ,Propane, 1,1,3-triethoxy-, endo-Borneol, L-.alpha.-Terpineol, Tetradecane, (1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene, 1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)cyclohexa-1,3-diene, Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-,  (1S,5S)-2-Methyl-5-((R)-6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene, decahydro-1,1,3a-trimethyl-7-methylene-, [1aS-(1a.alpha.,3a.alpha.,7a.beta.,7b.alpha.)]-, Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-7-methyl-4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1.alpha.,4a.beta.,8a.alpha.)-, .alpha.-Farnesene, .beta.-Bisabolene, Cyclohexene, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-6-methylene-, [S-(R*,S*)]-, (E)-1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-ylidene)cyclohex-1-ene, Nerolidyl acetate, Hexadecane, Guaiol, Butan-2-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenylanalytical methods have discovered at least 115 components in both fresh and dried)-, 3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-, 6,10-Dodecadien-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, Phenol, 5-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-2-methyl-, (R)-, 2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-7.alpha.-isopropyl-4a.beta.,8a.beta.-dimethyl-, 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-5-ol, octahydro-3,8,8-trimethyl-6-methylene-, n-Hexadecanoic acid, Glutaric acid, myrtenyl 3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl ester, 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, 9-Octadecenoic acid, (E)-, Octadecanoic acid, Caryophyllene oxide,  (E)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-3-en-5-one, Caryophyllene oxide,3-Decanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, Caryophyllene oxide, 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-4-en-3-one, 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decane-3,5-dione, Nerolidyl acetate, 5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodecan-3-one, 5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decan-3-one, 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodec-4-en-3-one,  (3R,5S)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decane-3,5-diyl diacetate, (E)-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-1-ene-3,5-dione, 5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodecan-3-one, 2-Methylhexacosane, 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradec-4-en-3-one, 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradecane-3,5-dione, Tetrapentacontane

Pharmacology :

The therapeutic properties of ginger and its constituents include immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumorigenic, anti-apoptotic, anti-hyperglycemic, anti-lipidemic, and anti-emetic effects. A powerful antioxidant, ginger may lessen or stop the generation of free radicals. Because it has few and mild side effects, it is considered a safe herbal medicine.(9)

Fig.1 : Pharmacological Action of Ginger

SOXHLET EXTRACTION :

Numerous cutting-edge techniques, including rapid solvent extraction, Soxhlet extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, and microwave-assisted extraction, have been developed to extract nutraceuticals from plants. These techniques seek to enhance extraction yield, decrease solvent usage, shorten extraction timeframes, and improve extract quality.(10)Soxhlet extraction is a type of atmospheric liquid extraction in which specific compounds are extracted using solvents at low pressures (outside pressure) at boiling temperatures.(11)  In 1879, Franz von Soxhlet created a particular kind of laboratory apparatus called the Soxhlet extractor. Its original purpose was to remove a lipid from a solid. Soxhlet extraction is usually used when the contaminant is insoluble and the desired molecule is poorly soluble in a solvent. It efficiently recycles a little amount of solvent to dissolve a larger amount of material, allowing for unsupervised and uncontrolled operation.(12, 13)

Assembly:

  • The source material containing the compound to be extracted is placed inside the thimble.
  • The thimble is loaded into the main chamber of the Soxhlet extractor.
  • The extraction solvent to be used is placed in a distillation flask.
  • The flask is placed on the heating element.
  • The Soxhlet extractor is placed atop the flask.
  • A reflux condenser is placed atop the extractor.
              

                                                          (A)                                                             (B)

Fig.2: (A) Assembly of soxhlet apparatus For extraction. (B)Ginger powder kept inside thimble filter suspended inside Ethanol solution.

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY – MASS SPECTRUM ANALYSIS :

For the analysis of unknown plant components, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a crucial instrument.(14) Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) is a hyphenated analytical technique that combines the separation and detection powers of gas-liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify different compounds in a test sample. GC is used to distinguish the volatile and thermally stable alternatives in a sample, whereas GC-MS breaks apart the analyte to be identified based on its mass. A mass spectrometer is added to it to produce GC-MS/MS. Performance is better in single and triple quadrupole modes.

Working of GC-MS:

The size of the column and the phase characteristics (e.g., 5% phenyl polysiloxane) determine which capillary column is utilized in the gas chromatograph. Because different molecules in a mixture have different chemical characteristics and varying affinities for the stationary phase of the column, the molecules will separate as the sample travels along the length of the column. Since the molecules are kept by the column and then elute from the column at different times, the mass spectrometer downstream can independently collect, ionize, accelerate, and detect the ionized molecules. The mass spectrometer uses each molecule's mass-to-charge ratio to identify the ionized fragments that are produced. A description of its tools and capabilities is given below:

  

Fig .3 :Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy of Shimadzu , Japan.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:

1. Collection and preparation of plant material:

The ginger rhizomes were ground with a sanitized pestle and mortar after being allowed to dry at room temperature for ten to fifteen days. A sieve was then used to reduce the size of the powdered plant. After being placed in an airtight container to prevent the effects of humidity, the fine powder was kept at room temperature.

2. Preparation of Sample:

In the Soxhlet Extractor, the ginger sample is put in a porous thimble, which is often constructed of filter paper. Under the extractor, a flask containing hot methanol is used. Methanol rises through a tube to the condenser after evaporating. The sample in the thimble is hit by the condenser's condensation of the methanol vapor. Methanol dissolves the required components in the sample, filling the extractor with the solvent-solute mixture. Once the solvent level reaches the siphon tube, a new extraction cycle is started by sucking the solvent-solute mixture back into the flask. The desired compounds are extracted from the sample by repeating this cycle of boiling, condensation, and siphoning.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY- MASS SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

Sr. No.

Phytochemical

Compounds

RT

(Min.)

Formula

Molecular Weight

Chemical Structure

1

1-Propanol, 2-ethoxy-

4.611

C5H12O2

104

2

Propane, 1,1,3-triethoxy-

11.751

C9H20O3

176

3

endo-Borneol

14.446

C10H18O

154

4

L-.alpha.-Terpineol

15.147

C10H18O

154

5

Gingerol

18.799

C17H26O4

294

6

Tetradecane

20.696

C14H30

198

7

(1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene

22.440

C15H24

204

8

1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)cyclohexa-1,3-diene

22.844

C15H24

204

9

Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-

22.928

C15H22

202

10

(1S,5S)-2-Methyl-5-((R)-6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene

23.235

C15H24

204

11

1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene, decahydro-1,1,3a-trimethyl-7-methylene-, [1aS-(1a.alpha.,3a.alpha.,7a.beta.,7b.alpha.)]-

23.325

C15H24

204

12

Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-7-methyl-4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1.alpha.,4a.beta.,8a.alpha.)-

23.407

C15H24

204

13

.alpha.-Farnesene

23.409

C15H24

204

14

beta.-Bisabolene

23.560

C15H24

204

15

Cyclohexene, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-6-methylene-, [S-(R*,S*)]-

23.944

C15H24

204

16

(E)-1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-ylidene) cyclohex-1-ene

24.140

C15H24

204

17

Nerolidyl acetate

24.834

C17H28O2

264

18

Hexadecane

25.556

C16H34

226

19

Guaiol

26.434

C15H26O

222

20

Butan-2-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)-

26.894

C11H14O3

194

21

3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-

27.356

C15H26O

222

22

6,10-Dodecadien-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-

27.938

C15H24O

220

23

Phenol, 5-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl) -2-methyl-, (R)-

29.210

C15H22O

218

24

2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-7.alpha.-isopropyl-4a.beta.,8a.beta.-dimethyl-

30.727

C15H24O

220

25

1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-5-ol, octahydro-3,8,8-trimethyl-6-methylene-

32.287

C15H24O

220

26

n-Hexadecanoic acid

34.293

C16H32O2

256

27

Glutaric acid, myrtenyl 3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl ester

34.731

C20H30O4

334

28

9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-

37.961

C18H32O2

280

29

9-Octadecenoic acid, (E)-

38.064

C18H34O2

282

30

Octadecanoic acid

38.501

C18H36O2

284

31

Caryophyllene oxide

39.512

C15H24O

220

32

(E)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-3-en-5-one

39.784

C17H24O3

276

33

3-Decanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)

39.948

C17H26O3

278

34

1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) dec-4-en-3-one

41.059

C17H24O3

276

35

1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decane-3,5-dione

41.745

C17H24O4

292

36

5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodecan-3-one

42.449

C19H30O4

322

37

5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decan-3-one

42.738

C17H26O4

294

38

1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) dodec-4-en-3-one

44.594

C19H28O3

304

39

(3R,5S)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) decane-3,5-diyl diacetate

44.947

C21H32O6

380

40

(E)-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) dec-1-ene-3,5-dione

46.373

C17H22O4

290

41

5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) dodecan-3-one

46.489

C19H30O4

322

42

2-Methylhexacosane

47.980

C27H56

380

43

1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) tetradec-4-en-3-one

48.519

C21H32O3

332

44

1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) tetradecane-3,5-dione

49.325

C21H32O4

348

45

Tetrapentacontane

49.935

C54H110

758

Fig.4: chromatogram of zingiber officinale by GC-MS

Fig. 1: Structure of 1-Propanol, 2-ethoxy- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=4.611 using GC-MS analysis

Fig. 2: Structure of Propane, 1,1,3-triethoxy- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=11.751using GC-MS analysis

Fig. 3: Structure of endo-Borneol present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=14.446 using GC-MS analysis

Fig. 4: Structure of L-.alpha.-Terpineol present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=15.147using GC-MS analysis

Fig. 5: Structure of Gingerol present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=18.799 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .6: Structure of Tetradecane present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=20.696 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .7: Structure of (1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=22.440 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .8: Structure of 1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)cyclohexa-1,3-diene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=22.844 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .9: Structure of Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methylpresent in Zingiber officinale with retention time=22.928 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .10: Structure of (1S,5S)-2-Methyl-5-((R)-6-methylhept-5-en-2-yl)bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.235 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .11: Structure of 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene, decahydro-1,1,3a-trimethyl-7-methylene-, [1aS-(1a.alpha.,3a.alpha.,7a.beta.,7b.alpha.)]-present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.325 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .12: Structure of Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-7-methyl-4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1.alpha.,4a.beta.,8a.alpha.)- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.407 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .13: Structure of alpha.-Farnesene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.490 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .14: Structure of  beta.-Bisabolene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.560 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .15: Structure of  Cyclohexene, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-6-methylene-, [S-(R*,S*)]-  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=23.944 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .16: Structure of  (E)-1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-ylidene)cyclohex-1-ene present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=24.140 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .17: Structure of  Nerolidyl acetate present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=24.834 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .18: Structure of  hexadecane present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=25.556 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .19: Structure of  Guaiol presgent in Zingiber officinale with retention time=26.443 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .20: Structure of Butan-2-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)- presgent in Zingiber officinale with retention time=26.894 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .21: Structure of  3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl- presgent in Zingiber officinale with retention time=27.356 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .22: Structure of  6,10-Dodecadien-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=27.938 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .23: Structure of  Phenol, 5-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-2-methyl-, (R)- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=29.210 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .24: Structure of  2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-7.alpha.-isopropyl-4a.beta.,8a.beta.-dimethyl-present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=30.727 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .25: Structure of  1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-5-ol, octahydro-3,8,8-trimethyl-6-methylene- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=32.287 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .26: Structure of  n-Hexadecanoic acid present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=34.293 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .27: Structure of Glutaric acid, myrtenyl 3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl ester  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=34.731 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .28: Structure of  9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=37.961 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .29: Structure of  9-Octadecenoic acid, (E)- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=38.064 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .30: Structure of  Octadecenoic acid  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=38.501 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .31: Structure of  Caryophyllene oxide present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=39.512 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .32: Structure of  (E)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-3-en-5-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=39.784 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .33: Structure of  3-Decanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=39.948 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .34: Structure of  1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dec-4-en-3-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=41.059 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .35: Structure of  1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decane-3,5-dione present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=41.742 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .36: Structure of  5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodecan-3-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=42.449 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .37: Structure of  5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decan-3-one  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=42.738 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .38: Structure of  1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodec-4-en-3-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=44.594 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .39: Structure of  (3R,5S)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)decane-3,5-diyl diacetate  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=44.947 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .40: Structure of  1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradec-1-ene-3,5-dione present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=46.373  using GC-MS analysis

Fig .41: Structure of  5-Hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)dodecan-3-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=46.489 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .42: Structure of  2-Methylhexacosane present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=47.980 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .43: Structure of  1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradec-4-en-3-one present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=48.519 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .44: Structure of  1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradecane-3,5-dione  present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=49.325 using GC-MS analysis

Fig .45: Structure of  Tetrapentacontane present in Zingiber officinale with retention time=49.935  using GC-MS analysis

CONCLUSION

From the study's findings, it can be predicted that Zingiber officinale contains many different kinds of bioactive compounds. These compounds were extracted using a methanolic extract and then exposed to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry examination. These results suggest that the extraction and analysis of phytoconstituents can be done with greater accuracy and precision.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are thankful to the management of Department of pharmaceutical chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India for providing Library and laboratory facility for completing this work successfully.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All the authors contributed significantly to this manuscript, participated in reviewing/editing, and approved the final draft for publication. The research profile of the authors can be verified from their ORCID IDs, given below

Dr. Avinash V. Chavan : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-5006

Ms. Vrushali K. Patil : https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3959-2881

Ms. Prarthana U. Mane : https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0219-7988

REFERENCES

  1. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. 2012. p. 319–35.
  2. Ross IA. Medicinal Plants of the World. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; p. 507–560.
  3. Shareef HK, Muhammed HJ, Hussein HM, Hameed IH. Antibacterial effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) Roscoe and bioactive chemical analysis using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrum. Orient J Chem. 2016;32(2).
  4. White B. Ginger: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jun 1;75(11):1689–91. PMID: 17575660.
  5. DerMarderosian A, Beutler JA. The Review of Natural Products. St. Louis (MO): Wolters Kluwer; 2006.
  6. Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011.
  7. Jolad SD, Lantz RC, Chen GJ, Bates RB, Timmermann BN. Commercially processed dry ginger (Zingiber officinale): composition and effects on LPS-stimulated PGE2 production. Phytochemistry. 2005 Jul;66(13):1614–35. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.05.007. PMID: 15996695.
  8. Bode AM, Dong Z. The Amazing and Mighty Ginger. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011. Chapter 7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92775/
  9. Ali BH, Blunden G, Tanira MO, Nemmar A. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Feb;46(2):409–20. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.085. Epub 2007 Sep 18. PMID: 17950516.
  10. Wang L, Weller CL. Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17(6):300–12.
  11. Saini RK, Keum YS. Carotenoid extraction methods: A review of recent developments. Food Chem. 2018;240:90–103.
  12. Harwood LM, Moody CJ. Experimental organic chemistry: Principles and Practice. Illustrated ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 1989. p. 122–5.
  13. Soxhlet F. Die gewichtsanalytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes. Dingler’s Polytech J. 1879;232:461–5. German.
  14. Kavitha R. Phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds present in ethanolic extracts of leaf and fruit of Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2021;12(5):2755–64.
  15. Sahil K, Prashant B, Akanksha M, Premjeet S, Devashish R. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Applications. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2011;2:1544–60.
  16. Jenke DR. Chromatographic Method Validation: A Review of Current Practices and Procedures. II. Guidelines for Primary Validation Parameters. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 1996;19(5):737–57. doi:10.1080/10826079608005534.
  17. Rowley AG. Evaluating Uncertainty for Laboratories. A Practical Handbook. 2001.

Reference

  1. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. 2012. p. 319–35.
  2. Ross IA. Medicinal Plants of the World. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; p. 507–560.
  3. Shareef HK, Muhammed HJ, Hussein HM, Hameed IH. Antibacterial effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) Roscoe and bioactive chemical analysis using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrum. Orient J Chem. 2016;32(2).
  4. White B. Ginger: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jun 1;75(11):1689–91. PMID: 17575660.
  5. DerMarderosian A, Beutler JA. The Review of Natural Products. St. Louis (MO): Wolters Kluwer; 2006.
  6. Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011.
  7. Jolad SD, Lantz RC, Chen GJ, Bates RB, Timmermann BN. Commercially processed dry ginger (Zingiber officinale): composition and effects on LPS-stimulated PGE2 production. Phytochemistry. 2005 Jul;66(13):1614–35. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.05.007. PMID: 15996695.
  8. Bode AM, Dong Z. The Amazing and Mighty Ginger. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011. Chapter 7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92775/
  9. Ali BH, Blunden G, Tanira MO, Nemmar A. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Feb;46(2):409–20. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.085. Epub 2007 Sep 18. PMID: 17950516.
  10. Wang L, Weller CL. Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17(6):300–12.
  11. Saini RK, Keum YS. Carotenoid extraction methods: A review of recent developments. Food Chem. 2018;240:90–103.
  12. Harwood LM, Moody CJ. Experimental organic chemistry: Principles and Practice. Illustrated ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 1989. p. 122–5.
  13. Soxhlet F. Die gewichtsanalytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes. Dingler’s Polytech J. 1879;232:461–5. German.
  14. Kavitha R. Phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds present in ethanolic extracts of leaf and fruit of Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2021;12(5):2755–64.
  15. Sahil K, Prashant B, Akanksha M, Premjeet S, Devashish R. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Applications. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2011;2:1544–60.
  16. Jenke DR. Chromatographic Method Validation: A Review of Current Practices and Procedures. II. Guidelines for Primary Validation Parameters. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 1996;19(5):737–57. doi:10.1080/10826079608005534.
  17. Rowley AG. Evaluating Uncertainty for Laboratories. A Practical Handbook. 2001.

Photo
Vrushali Patil
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, Kolhapur-416213, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Avinash Chavan
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, Kolhapur-416213, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Prarthana Mane
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, Kolhapur-416213, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Abhijeet Kulkarni
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ashokrao Mane Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Save, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Raigad, Kolhapur-416213, Maharashtra, India.

Abhijeet Kulkarni, Avinash Chavan, Vrushali Patil, Prarthana Mane, Bioactive Compounds Extraction and Analysis of Ginger: A Study of Zingiber officinale, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 10, 569-591. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23165126

More related articles
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.: A Comprehensive Revie...
Marati Kavitha, Medipally Pravallika, Muthyala Akhila, Nomula Man...
Formulation And Comparative Evaluation of Liquid a...
Shaik Nushrath Bhanu, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha...
Formulation, Physicochemical Characterization, and In-Vitro Dissolution Enhancem...
Abirami P, Jeevanandham S, Vasanthan A, Revanth Kumar M G...
Smart Pills, Smarter Printing: AI In 3D Printing Of Oral Dosage Forms...
Anjali Patel, Dhananjay Meshram, Satyajit Sahoo...
Emerging Strategies in Nail Psoriasis Management: Indigo Naturalis-Loaded Nail L...
Dr.Aadi Sathyan, Dr.Preetha S Panicker, Greeshma Geevarghese, Fathima Meharin P.S., Antony M.J., Ama...
Related Articles
Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Review...
Mavuri Roshini Surya Naga Sri Santoshi, K. Eswar Kumar, Routhu Pratyusha, Tadikamalla Lakshmi Bhavya...
Recent Advances in Mesalamine (5-ASA) for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Optim...
Hiba Abdul Razak, Artha Rajagopal K, Amrutha P Anil, Alagha K, Fathima C O, Megha Santhosh M, Arun R...
More related articles
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.: A Comprehensive Review of Phytochemistry, Tradition...
Marati Kavitha, Medipally Pravallika, Muthyala Akhila, Nomula Manisha, Maheen Saniya...
Formulation And Comparative Evaluation of Liquid and Solid Self-Nano-Emulsifying...
Shaik Nushrath Bhanu, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha...
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.: A Comprehensive Review of Phytochemistry, Tradition...
Marati Kavitha, Medipally Pravallika, Muthyala Akhila, Nomula Manisha, Maheen Saniya...
Formulation And Comparative Evaluation of Liquid and Solid Self-Nano-Emulsifying...
Shaik Nushrath Bhanu, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha...