View Article

Abstract

Quantum nanomaterials are revolutionizing the field of precision medicine by allowing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures at the molecular and subcellular level. Of these, semiconductor quantum dots, carbon quantum dots, graphene-based quantum nanostructures, and quantum sensing platforms are characterized by their unique optical, electronic, and magnetic properties, which are a result of quantum confinement effects and other quantum phenomena. These properties, including size-dependent fluorescence, sharp emission spectra, high photostability, and ultra-high sensitivity, have made quantum nanomaterials valuable tools for bioimaging, biosensing, targeted drug delivery, and theranostic applications. In the diagnostic area, quantum dots provide ultra-high sensitivity and multiplex analysis for the detection of disease biomarkers, which is crucial for early diagnosis and molecular typing, a requirement for personalized medicine. In the field of therapeutics, quantum nanomaterials are used as carriers for drugs and genes, photosensitizers for photodynamic and photothermal therapies, and as multifunctional platforms that integrate imaging and therapeutic modalities into a single device. On the other hand, quantum sensing technologies such as nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond and atomic magnetometers are being developed for ultra-sensitive and label-free medical imaging and functional diagnostics. Although there has been great progress in the preclinical stage, translation to the clinical stage has been impeded by several issues regarding toxicity, long-term biocompatibility, scalability of manufacturing, and regulatory issues. This review article aims to give a comprehensive and critical assessment of the types of quantum nanomaterials, their applications in diagnosis and therapy, recent progress in research, and challenges in translation. Finally, future directions are also presented, focusing on biodegradable and metal-free quantum materials, multimodal theranostic platforms, and the integration of quantum

Keywords

Analytical lifecycle, ICH Target Profile (ATP Quantum nanomaterials; Quantum dots; Precision medicine; Bioimaging; Biosensing; Theranostics; Photodynamic therapy; Photothermal.

Introduction

× Popup Image

The objective of precision medicine is to provide a diagnosis and treatment that is tailored to the individual patient’s molecular profile. This requires the use of technologies that are sensitive and specific enough to investigate biological systems at the molecular or even atomic level. Quantum particles and quantum-inspired nanomaterials have been identified as promising candidates for this purpose, as they possess properties that are fundamentally different from those of conventional materials.[1]

Quantum nanomaterials, such as quantum dots, nanocrystals, and nanoscale defects, rely on quantum confinement phenomena for their distinctive properties. As the size of a material approaches the de Broglie wavelength of charge carriers, energy levels become discrete, resulting in size-dependent optical and electronic properties. In the biomedical field, this means that fluorescence emission can be designed to be tunable, with small spectral bandwidths, high quantum yields, and high resistance to photobleaching. This is especially useful in bioimaging, biosensing, and multiplexed diagnostics.[2]In addition to material aspects, quantum medicine also involves the use of quantum-sensing and imaging capabilities that rely on quantum phenomena such as spin coherence and superposition. Quantum-enhanced technologies in magnetic resonance imaging, magnetometry, and functional imaging are being developed to attempt to detect very weak signals that are often below the level of detection of conventional instruments. Notably, the goal of these technologies is not innovation, but improvement.The early and precise diagnosis of diseases is still a major challenge in the fields of oncology, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and infectious diseases. Conventional imaging techniques and biomarker analysis may not be sensitive enough for the early diagnosis of diseases or for the detection of minimal residual disease, especially when multiple targets need to be evaluated together. Quantum nanomaterials can help overcome some of these challenges as they allow multiplexed detection, high-contrast imaging, and real-time analysis of biological processes.[3,4] The many quantum nanomaterials, quantum dots have been the most investigated for their applications in biomedicine. Quantum dots have been used as fluorescent labels for in vitro and in vivo imaging, finding applications in immunoassays, nucleic acid detection, tumor imaging, and cell tracking. The high photostability of quantum dots makes it possible to monitor cellular functions for extended periods, and their ability to be functionalized enables them to target specific biomarkers for diseases.On the other hand, quantum nanomaterials are also being investigated as therapeutic agents. In theranostic applications, a quantum-based platform is used to combine diagnosis and therapy, enabling real-time monitoring of treatment. This is especially promising in photodynamic and photothermal therapy applications, where feedback from imaging can be utilized to optimize light exposure. Although there has been considerable progress, there are still challenges in the use of quantum nanomaterials for therapeutic applications.[4,5]

The purpose of this review is to give a full account of quantum nanomaterials in precision medicine, including materials, diagnostic and therapeutic uses, recent advances, challenges, and the future outlook. Through the integration of nanotechnology, quantum physics, and biomedical knowledge, this article will discuss the potential and challenges of translating quantum nanomedicine from the laboratory to the clinic.

2. Types of Quantum Nanomaterials

 

Table 1. Application of Quantum Dots in Biomedical

Quantum nanomaterial

size (nm)

physicochemical properties

Advantages

Limitations

Biomedical applications

Reference

Semiconductor quantum dots (CdSe, CdTe, InP)

1–10

Size-tunable fluorescence, high quantum yield, narrow emission bands

Bright and stable signals, excellent multiplexing

Potential heavy-metal toxicity, long-term retention

In vitro diagnostics, tumor imaging, PDT/PTT

[6,7,8,9,10]

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs)

<10

Metal-free fluorescence, surface-state emission, high water solubility

Improved biocompatibility, low cost, easy functionalization

Lower brightness than semiconductor QDs

Biosensing, live-cell imaging, drug delivery

[11,12,13,14,15]

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs)

<20

Strong NIR absorption, edge-state fluorescence, photothermal conversion

Efficient PTT/PDT, chemical versatility

Stability and batch variability

Cancer theranostics, biosensors

[16,17,18,19,20]

Black phosphorus QDs

2–10

Strong NIR absorption, high photothermal efficiency

Excellent PTT performance

Chemical instability, oxidation

Cancer phototherapy

[21,22,23,24]

Perovskite QDs

5–15

Ultra-narrow emission, very high PL efficiency

Exceptional optical properties

Lead toxicity, poor stability

Imaging, sensing (mainly in vitro)

[25,26]

NV-center nanodiamonds

5–100

Quantum spin coherence, magnetic sensitivity

Label-free sensing, ultra-high sensitivity

Cost, complex instrumentation

Quantum MRI, neuronal sensing

[27,28,29,30,31]

 

2.1 Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Semiconductor quantum dots are nanocrystals that are usually between 1-10 nm in size and are made of II-VI or III-V semiconductors such as CdSe, CdTe, ZnS, or InP. At this size, there is strong quantum confinement, which results in the ability to tune the fluorescence wavelength by size. Quantum dots have high quantum yields, sharp emission bands, and high photostability, making them excellent fluorescent markers for biomedical applications.[6,7,8,]However, for biological applications, semiconductor quantum dots are typically made water-dispersible and biocompatible by surface modification with polymers, silica shells, or lipid layers. Biological functionalization with antibodies, peptides, aptamers, or small molecules allows specific targeting of disease biomarkers. Consequently, quantum dots have been applied extensively for tumor marker conjugation, nucleic acid sensing, cell imaging, and in vivo imaging of cancer, vascular diseases, and infections. The major advantage of quantum dots is their ability to perform multiplex analysis because several quantum dots with different emission wavelengths can be applied simultaneously with very little spectral overlap.[8,9,10]

2.2 Carbon Quantum Dots

Carbon quantum dots are fluorescent nanoparticles, generally smaller than 10 nm, composed primarily of carbon and its derivatives. Unlike traditional semiconductor quantum dots, carbon quantum dots do not rely on heavy metals, which significantly improves their biocompatibility profile. Their photoluminescence arises from a combination of quantum confinement and surface-state effects, and their optical properties can be tuned through size control, heteroatom doping, and surface functionalization.[10,11,13]Carbon quantum dots can be synthesized using a wide variety of top-down and bottom-up approaches from inexpensive and abundant carbon sources. They typically exhibit good water solubility, chemical stability, and resistance to photobleaching. These properties have led to extensive exploration of carbon quantum dots as probes for cell imaging, tumor localization, and biosensing of ions, metabolites, and proteins. Furthermore, functionalization with targeting ligands and therapeutic cargos enables their use as platforms for combined imaging and drug or gene delivery.[14,15]

2.3 Graphene Quantum Dots and Related Carbon-Based Nanostructures

Graphene quantum dots are nanoscale fragments of graphene or graphene oxide that combine quantum confinement with edge effects arising from their finite size. These materials have discrete energy levels, size-dependent fluorescence properties, and a high density of surface functional groups, which are beneficial for chemical modifications. The sp²-hybridized carbon lattice is responsible for the distinctive electronic and optical properties, such as high light absorption and efficient photothermal conversion. [16, 17, 18,] In the field of biomedical research, graphene quantum dots have been explored for fluorescence imaging, photothermal and photodynamic therapy, and biosensing. The high near-infrared absorption of graphene quantum dots makes them highly desirable for photothermal therapy, and their surface chemistry allows for sensitive biomolecule detection in electrochemical and optical biosensors. These properties make graphene quantum dots versatile building blocks for multifunctional theranostic systems.[19,20]

2.4 Emerging Quantum Nanomaterials

Besides traditional quantum dots, there are a number of newly emerging nanomaterials that have been investigated for their potential use in biomedicine based on their quantum properties. Black phosphorus quantum dots have high near-infrared absorption and efficient photothermal conversion, but their chemical instability in aqueous and oxygen-rich media requires special stabilization. Perovskite quantum dots have very high efficiencies of photoluminescence and a narrow emission spectrum, but the presence of lead and stability issues have so far hindered their in vivo applications.[21,22]Transition metal dichalcogenide quantum dots, for example, those based on MoS? or WS?, are materials that exhibit the quantum size effect together with the layer properties of two-dimensional materials.These systems are under investigation for multimodal imaging, responsive drug delivery, and theranostic applications that exploit light or redox-triggered mechanisms.[23,24,25]

2.5 Quantum Sensing for Medicine

Based on the point defects generated by a substitutional nitrogen atom adjacent to a lattice vacancy, the nitrogen-vacancy (NV) defects in diamonds are a specific type of quantum sensing architecture. Spin-dependent fluorescence can be used for the optical initialization and readout of these defects, which are quantum spin systems.[26]The main advantage of NV centers is that they can detect extremely weak thermal, electric, and magnetic signals in the nanoscale under physiological conditions. In addition, NV-based sensing can detect high-resolution images of biological processes, including neuronal activities and intracellular communication. This is in contrast to other imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which require huge magnetic fields and have low spatial resolution.[27]Moreover, real-time and continuous monitoring of dynamic biological media is facilitated by the long spin coherence time and photostability of NV centers. Due to this, quantum sensing platforms have the potential to emerge as significant tools for future diagnostics that will be much more sensitive and spatially precise compared to conventional techniques.[28]

2.6 Quantum Confinement Regimes and Optical Behavior

Quantum confinement regimes in semiconductor nanostructures are sometimes categorized depending on the size of the quantum dot in relation to the exciton Bohr radius as weak, medium, and strong quantum confinement, depending on the quantum dot radius in relation to the exciton Bohr radius. In the weak quantum confinement regime, the quantum dot radius is larger than the exciton radius, whereas in the strong quantum confinement regime, the quantum dot radius is smaller than the exciton radius. This changes the optical properties of the semiconductor nanostructures dramatically, with the quantum dot size causing a blue shift in the excitation peaks when the size is smaller.[68]Recent developments indicate that excitons may be electrically tuned to confine in 2D semiconductors, enabling exact control over excitonic states and opening the door for quantum photonic devices.[69]In addition, in PbS quantum dots, the absorption coefficients are quite different from bulk values due to quantum confinement effects. In these quantum dots, quantum confinement effects cover wide spectrum regions 5. By using confinement potentials and external fields, these quantum confinement regimes can also be used to control refractive index changes and nonlinear optics.[70]

3. Applications in Diagnostics

 

Table 2. Diagnostic applications of quantum Dots in  medicine

Application

Quantum nanomaterial

Target disease

Advantage

Reference

Immunoassays & microarrays

Semiconductor QDs

Cancer and cardiac biomarkers

High sensitivity, multiplexed detection

[32,33,34,35]

Nucleic acid detection

QDs, CQDs

DNA, RNA, miRNA

Low detection limits, photostability

[36,37,38]

Cellular imaging

QDs, CQDs

Receptors, organelles

Long-term tracking, multicolor imaging

[39,40]

In vivo tumor imaging

NIR QDs, GQDs

Solid tumors, angiogenesis

Deep tissue penetration, high contrast

[41,42]

Liquid biopsy

QDs

CTCs, exosomes

Early detection, minimal invasiveness

[43,44]

Quantum-enhanced imaging

NV nanodiamonds

Neural and cardiac activity

Label-free, ultra-sensitive functional imaging

[44,45,46]

 

 

 

3.1 In -Vitro Diagnostics and Biosensing

In-vitro diagnostics (IVD) refers to diagnostic tests performed on biological samples such as blood, serum, plasma, urine, or saliva outside the human body to detect diseases, monitor health conditions, or assess therapeutic responses. Biosensing technologies represent the primary analytical basis for contemporary IVD systems, which allow selective, sensitive, and rapid detection of clinically significant biomarkers.[32,33]Biosensors in IVD combine a biological recognition component (such as enzymes, antibodies, nucleic acids, or aptamers) with a physicochemical transducer that translates the biorecognition process into a measurable signal. This signal is then processed and analyzed to give diagnostic results. The specificity of biosensing in IVD is mainly due to highly selective biological interactions such as enzyme-substrate reactions, antigen-antibody interactions, or complementary nucleic acid hybridization.[34,35]Even though there are several studies showing good sensitivity and specificity for quantum dot-based systems, there are differences due to differences in surface functionalization, synthesis, and biological settings, which again highlight the need for standard evaluation procedures.

3.2 Cellular and Subcellular Bioimaging

Cell/subcellular bioimaging can be described as the utilization of cutting-edge imaging tools that allow the real-time imaging of biological processes at the single cell/subcellular level in living organisms. This technique is largely driven by the use of fluorescent labels, particularly genetically encoded fluorescent proteins, which allow the specific labeling of organelles, proteins, or signaling pathways, all without affecting the biological conditions. With the use of these labels in conjunction with high-resolution imaging tools such as confocal, two-photon, or intravital microscopes, it is possible to image real-time biological processes such as protein transport, cell-cell interactions, gene expression, or signaling.[39]In subcellular analysis, bioimaging methods have been very important for understanding the location and movement of cell components such as the nucleus, mitochondria, cytoskeleton, and endoplasmic reticulum. Notably, bioimaging techniques have limitations in histology investigations as they are capable of monitoring living organisms in their lifetime. In addition to this limitation, bioimaging techniques are facing challenges in terms of the scattering of light, depth penetration, as well as photobleaching. However, continuous improvements in probes for bioimaging analysis have solved this limitation. In this way, bioimaging analysis in cells or subcellular components can no longer be underestimated in understanding biological systems.[40]

3.3 In Vivo Imaging and Early Disease Detection

In vivo imaging finds immense applications in the early diagnosis and treatment of diseases because it enables the visualization of structural, biochemical, and functional alterations within living tissues prior to the manifestation of symptoms. Modern imaging modalities, including optical imaging (autofluorescence and narrow band imaging), molecular imaging, MRI, PET, and optical coherence imaging, are useful for real-time analyses of morphological, vascular, and metabolic alterations within living tissues resulting from early malign transformation. The techniques find applications in the diagnosis of lesions with early malign transformation and cancers.[41]Significantly, in vivo imaging is a complementary aspect of traditional approaches to diagnosis because it increases the efficiency of screening, biopsies, and follow-up on the progression of the disease. Although existing imaging technologies increase the visibility of early lesions, there remains uncertainty with regard to sensitivity and specificity, making them not entirely adequate for confirming diagnoses histopathologically. Breakthroughs in the coming era can therefore be anticipated to increase the effectiveness of in vivo imaging by virtue of enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and its utility in early diagnosis and preventative medicine.[42]

3.4 Multiplexed and Personalized Diagnostics

A new trend in today’s healthcare industry is multiplexed and personalized diagnostics. This can be regarded as a paradigm shift in today’s healthcare industry because for the first time in medical diagnostics, multiple biomarkers can be detected together to create a personalized disease profile for patients. Unlike before when medical diagnostics involved testing for a single analyte in a sample, today’s advanced platforms detect groups of proteins, nucleic acids, and/or metabolites simultaneously. This helps in understanding complex diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, and inflammation in a more differentiated manner.[43,44]Electrochemical, optical, and microfluidic biosensing platforms are at the heart of a multiplexed diagnostic system, which provides the sensitivity, detection limits, and miniaturization required by a point of care diagnostic platform. There is a tremendous advantage with the incorporation of nanomaterials, including nanoparticles, carbon tube structures, and nanostructured electrodes, which can provide a boost to the process of detection, sensitivity, and biosensing platforms. There is a lot of hope with the concept of personalized diagnostics, which can be achieved by deciphering the data from the multiplexed biomarkers, allowing the physician to prescribe treatments according to the individual biomarker of the patient, assess the response, and predict relapse.[45,46]While various studies have demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for quantum dot-based systems, differences arise due to differences in surface functionalization, synthesis methods, and biological systems, thus emphasizing the importance of standardization in assessment procedures.

4. Applications in Treatment

 

Table 3. Therapeutic  applications of quantum nanomaterials.

Therapeutic strategy

Quantum nanomaterial

Trigger mechanism

Target disease

Advantage

Reference

Targeted drug delivery

QDs, CQDs, GQDs

pH, enzymes, ligands

Cancer

Reduced systemic toxicity

[47,48]

Gene delivery

CQDs

Cellular uptake

Genetic disorders, cancer

Real-time tracking

[49,50]

Photodynamic therapy (PDT)

QDs, CQDs

Light-induced ROS

Cancer, infections

Localized cytotoxicity

[51,52]

Photothermal therapy (PTT)

GQDs, BP-QDs

NIR-induced heat

Solid tumors

Minimal invasiveness

[53,54]

Combined PDT/PTT

Hybrid QD systems

Dual light response

Cancer

Synergistic efficacy

[55,56]

Antimicrobial therapy

CQDs

Light-induced ROS

MDR infections

Antibiotic-free approach

[57,58]

Theranostics

Multifunctional QDs

Imaging + therapy

Precision oncology

Real-time treatment monitoring

[59,60]

 

4.1 Targeted Drug and Gene Delivery

Targeted drug and gene delivery is a major breakthrough in cancer therapy, which allows for the selective accumulation of drugs at the tumor site with minimal systemic toxicity. The article highlights that nanocarriers made of polymers can be designed to facilitate both passive and active targeting. Passive targeting is mainly based on the EPR effect, which enables nanoparticles to selectively accumulate in the tumor tissue due to its characteristic leaky vasculature and poor lymphatic drainage.[47]Besides the passive targeting approach, active targeting is realized by modifying the surface of polymer nanocarriers with particular ligands such as antibodies, peptides, folic acid, or aptamers that target the overexpressed receptors on the surface of cancer cells. The ligand-receptor interaction increases the cellular uptake of drugs and genetic materials through receptor-mediated endocytosis.[48]egarding gene delivery, the role of polymer nanocarriers in shielding nucleic acids (siRNA, miRNA, plasmid DNA) from enzymatic degradation and their transport across biological barriers is essential. The current topic is emphasized to improve gene transfection efficiency in the tumor microenvironment by using cationic and stimuli-responsive polymers. In addition, co-delivery approaches that combine drugs and genes in a single polymeric platform are also mentioned as a promising strategy to overcome multidrug resistance and achieve synergistic anticancer effects.[47,48]

4.2 Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy, or PDT, represents a minimally invasive treatment modality using a photosensitizing agent activated by light of specific wavelengths. This, in turn, generates reactive oxygen species that cause targeted cell destruction. The medical domain in which this therapy finds wide application includes oncology in the treatment of various cancers and dermatology for conditions such as actinic keratosis and acne. The localized delivery of light in instances of the selective accumulation of a photosensitizer in diseased tissues enables precise targeting while limiting damage to surrounding normal cells . Similarly, singlet oxygen and free radicals generated under PDT conditions induce apoptosis and necrosis, vascular shutdown, and an immune system attack, making the treatment more effective. The benefits of PDT include reduced systemic toxicity, repeatability, and a potential for combination with other treatment modalities.[49,50]One key aspect that defines the specificity of PDT is the double specificity of the preferential uptake of the photosensitizer by abnormal cells combined with the focused application of the activating photons. As a result, one gets specificity in the treatment due to reduced systemic toxicity that is often associated with conventional therapeutic methods such as chemotherapy and radiation. Ideally, the procedure of conducting a treatment in photodynamic therapy is considered to be comprised of three essential parts.[51,52]

4.3 Photothermal Therapy and Combined Approaches

Photothermal therapy presents a very precise and minimally invasive technique for cancer treatment through the use of near-infrared light to heat up and ablate tumor cells locally. In general, the combination of PTT with other therapies increases the overall efficacy by using complementary mechanisms. For example, in combination with chemotherapy, PTT increases tumor permeability, thus facilitating higher intratumoral intake of the drug and overcoming resistances, including reducing drug dosages and side effects. Similarly, combining photothermal therapy with immunotherapy enhances systemic anti-tumor immune responses by releasing antigens associated with tumors, leading to reduced metastasis and recurrence risks.[55]To overcome these issues, a combined therapeutic approach that combines PTT with other treatments has attracted considerable attention. Combining PTT with chemotherapy can enhance thermally triggered drug release, cellular uptake, and overcome multidrug resistance mechanisms to achieve a synergy of cytotoxicity at low doses of drugs. Similarly, PTT/photodynamic therapy (PDT) combinations can combine oxygen perfusion by heat-treated tissues and ROS production to achieve a synergy of tumor killing even under a hypoxic environment. Combining with radiotherapy has been demonstrated to make cancer tissues sensitive to the treatment by DNA damage induced by heat sensitivity and increased vascular permeability.[56]

4.4 Antimicrobial and Anti-Infective Applications

Natural products are now resurfacing as an important source of antimicrobial and anti-infective agents in an attempt to counteract the ever-increasing danger of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The latest findings underscore a wide range of bioactive compounds with a broad spectrum of activity against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, including multidrug-resistant strains, discovered in plants, microbes, and other natural sources. The mechanisms by which natural agents target microbes are varied and include actions on microbial cell membrane, interference with crucial enzymatic processes, modulation of nucleic acid synthesis, and reduction of virulence factors and biofilms[57].Notably, many natural products have been shown to have synergistic effects with conventional antibiotics, which can improve treatment outcomes while possibly lowering the dose and toxicity of drugs. Recent improvements in in silico simulations, molecular docking, and high-throughput screening have also helped to expedite the discovery and optimization of promising antimicrobial agents. Taken together, the above observations highlight the immense potential of natural products as complementary or alternative approaches for anti-infective therapy, and their inclusion in the development of next-generation antimicrobial therapies[58].

4.5 Theranostic Platforms

Recent research has revealed that Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and their derived nanomaterials have emerged as an attractive candidate material that has high potential for theranostic applications owing to their high surface area, ease of pore tuning, ease of structural design, as well as their adjustable chemical compositions. This provides an effective means to combine therapeutics, imaging, or biological molecules through a single platform.[59]Theranostic systems derived from MOFs, including porous carbon materials, metal or metal oxide nanoparticles, and single-atom nanozymes, show improved stability, catalytic ability, and responsiveness to stimuli in physiological conditions. Theranostic systems based on MOFs have been investigated extensively in multimodal imaging (flammency, magnetic resonance imaging, and photoacoustic imaging) and in combination with therapeutic modalities like chemotherapy, photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and chemodynamic therapy. More specifically, drug liberation and activation in response to tumor-specific stimuli, including pH values, redox potential, and enzymatic activity, can be finely controlled in MOF-based systems with minimal systemic toxicity and greater efficacy than traditional systems.[60]

 

 

 

Figure 1. Quntum Dot and Application

 

A CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dot nanoparticle with a functionalization of PEG, targeting ligands, and drug molecules. The image above represents a CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dot nanoparticle with a functionalization of PEG, targeting ligands, and drug molecules. The nanoparticle emits fluorescence when it is excited with a specific wavelength (λ?).

5. Research Progress

Quantum dots (QDs) have evolved as a promising class of nanomaterials for modern medicine due to their unique optical characteristics, functional surface chemistry, and versatile capability to perform multifunctional roles. The advances made during the period 2021-2025 have demonstrated tremendous advancements in quantum dot-based imaging, biosensing, drug delivery, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, as well as theranostics. The emergence of alternative, green, and environmentally compatible quantum dots such as carbon-based, graphene-based, and silicon quantum dots has overcome the toxicity problems faced by metal-based quantum dots. Advances made in the functionalization of quantum dots have immense possibilities to widen the application of quantum dots in the medical field.[61,62] However, in spite of these advances, clinical translation is still significantly hampered by a number of challenges including long-term toxicity, biodistribution, clearance, large-scale reproducibility, and lack of standardized regulatory guidelines. Overcoming these challenges will require integrated effort at the levels of material design, in vivo safety assessment, and manufacturing scalability. Quantum dots will be combined with other emerging techniques in the near future, including artificial intelligence, multimodal imaging systems, and personalized medicine to realize greatly improved diagnostic precision and therapeutic outcomes. Quantum dots have bright prospects for serving as next-generation tools in the early diagnosis, targeted therapy, and integrated theranostic applications of clinical medicine with continued interdisciplinary research and regulatory harmonization.[63,64]This is in spite of the fact that quantum dot-based systems have been said to have high sensitivity and specificity. This shows that there is a need for uniform evaluation standards.

6. Challenges

Despite the progress made, a number of challenges, especially the material-related and biological ones, are still a barrier to the clinical application of quantum nanoparticles. The potential toxicity of heavy metal-based quantum dots, especially those containing lead or cadmium, which can leak toxic ions during physiological conditions, is a major concern.[65]The formation of a protein corona during contact with biological fluids is another major concern for the clinical application of quantum nanoparticles. The unpredictable in vivo behavior of the quantum nanoparticles results from this phenomenon, which affects the targeting, optical, and surface properties of the quantum nanoparticles.The batch-to-batch variability also affects the issue of repeatability and uniformity. This is important for regulatory purposes, especially for carbon and graphene quantum dots. The issue of chronic toxicity also emerges due to the lack of understanding of the long-term biodistribution and accumulation patterns.[66]For the purposes of translation, making a theranostic system that can perform multiple functions in one system is complicated for the regulatory process. This is because the theranostic system has to comply with both therapeutic and diagnostic safety regulations. Large-scale synthesis of theranostic nanoparticles is still a barrier for theranostic nanoparticles.A multidisciplinary approach that involves advanced material synthesis, in vivo studies, and developing guidelines for translation is necessary to overcome the challenges.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

In precision medicine, the union of quantum nanomaterials and artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly becoming a game-changer. With the aid of quantum dots’ composition, dimension, and chemistry, machine learning techniques are increasingly being used to predict the physicochemical properties, toxicity, and biological interactions of these materials.Image processing using AI can significantly enhance the sensitivity and early detection of diseases during diagnostic procedures by optimizing the interpretation of quantum dot-based fluorescence. In addition, reproducibility and efficiency can be significantly improved by using AI-based optimization of nanoparticle synthesis and functionalization.The merging of quantum nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and microfluidics/digital health technologies promises to bring about real-time monitoring, predictive diagnostics, and personalized medicine, thereby advancing the field of medicine towards intelligent and responsive medicine.[67]

CONCLUSION

Quantum nanomaterials, especially quantum dots (QDs), have recently shown great promise as revolutionary technologies in precision medicine for their ability to provide highly sensitive diagnostic capabilities, targeted therapeutic interventions, and combined theranostic platforms. The size-dependent optical and electronic properties of QDs make them ideal for multiplexed biosensing, long-term bioimaging, photodynamic and photothermal therapy, and sophisticated drug and gene delivery systems. Recent breakthroughs in metal-free and biodegradable QDs, as well as advances in surface engineering methodologies, have greatly improved the biocompatibility and functional capabilities of QDs. However, issues of toxicity, biodistribution, scalability, and standardization of clinical applications remain as major hurdles for the clinical translation of QDs. Future research will require an interdisciplinary approach, green chemistry methods, and convergence with artificial intelligence and digital health technologies to unlock the full potential of quantum nanomedicine in precision healthcare.

REFERENCES

  1. Patil B, Lad M, Sharma P, Santani N, Rajpal M, Shaikh S. Revolutionizing Alzheimer’s Diagnosis using Quantum Computing. In2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) 2024 Apr 24 (pp. 479-485).
  2. Malik S, Muhammad K, Waheed Y. Emerging applications of nanotechnology in healthcare andmedicine.Molecules. 202Jan;28(18):6624. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186624
  3. Chow JC. Quantum computing in medicine. Medical Sciences. 2024 Nov 17;12(4):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12040067
  4. Jin C, Wang K, Oppong-Gyebi A, Hu J. Application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and therapy-a mini-review. International journal of medical sciences. 2020 Oct 18;17(18):2964.https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.49801
  5. Wang B, Hu S, Teng Y, Chen J, Wang H, Xu Y, Wang K, Xu J, Cheng Y, Gao X. Current advance of nanotechnology in diagnosis and treatment for malignant tumors. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2024 Aug 12;9(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01773-0
  6. Bruchez Jr M, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2013-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5385.2013
  7. Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose SJ, Li JJ, Sundaresan G, Wu AM, Gambhir SS, Weiss S. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):538-44.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104274
  8. Smith AM, Nie S. Next-generation quantum dots. Nature biotechnology. 2009 Aug;27(8):732-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0809-732
  9. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors Environ Health Perspect 114: 165–172. Find this article online. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8284
  10. Yong KT, Ding H, Roy I, Law WC, Bergey EJ, Maitra A, Prasad PN. Imaging pancreatic cancer using bioconjugated InP quantum dots. ACS nano. 2009 Mar 24;3(3):502-10. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn8008933
  11. Baker SN, Baker GA. Luminescent carbon nanodots: emergent nanolights. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010 Sep 10;49(38):6726-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200906623
  12. Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(1):362-81. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00269E
  13. Wang X, Xie X, Li Z, Zhang X, Yang B, Kang H, Yung PS, Gao Z, Wong SH, Bian L, Zhang K. Catalysis-mediated dynamic ligand presentation regulates mechanosensing–metabolism coupling of stem cells. Nano Today. 2024 Aug 1;57:102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102363
  14. Chen X, Zhan W, Duan H, Su Y, Li X, Jiang H, Xiong Y, Tang BZ, Huang X. Crescent-shaped Janus nanoassemblies of gold nanoparticles and AIEgens: Enhancing plasmonic and fluorescent activities for colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescence lateral flow immunoassay.NanoToday.2024Oct1;58:102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102452
  15. Wang H, Bi J, Zhu BW, Tan M. Multicolorful carbon dots for tumor theranostics. Current MedicinalChemistry.2018Aug1;25(25):2894-909. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666171229144421
  16. Sun X, Liu Z, Welsher K, Robinson JT, Goodwin A, Zaric S, Dai H. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano research. 2008 Sep;1(3):203-12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8
  17. Zhu S, Tang S, Zhang J, Yang B. Control the size and surface chemistry of graphene for the rising fluorescent materials. Chemical communications. 2012;48(38):4527-39. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc30404d
  18. Jena N, Rawat A, Ahammed R, Mohanta MK, De Sarkar A. Emergence of high piezoelectricity along with robust electron mobility in Janus structures in semiconducting Group IVB dichalcogenide monolayers. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2018;6(48):24885-98.https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA08222H
  19. Li X, Li T, Liu B, Hu N, Hu T, Ni Z. Boosting the performance of an iontophoretic biosensing system with a graphene aerogel and Prussian blue for highly sensitive and noninvasive glucose monitoring. Analyst. 2023;148(14):3184-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN00498B
  20. Alrbyawi H, Poudel I, Annaji M, Arnold RD, Tiwari AK, Babu RJ. Recent advancements of stimuli-responsive targeted liposomal formulations for cancer drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2022 Feb 1;10(1):3-23. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738509666210608144804
  21. Sun Z, Xie H, Tang S, Yu XF, Guo Z, Shao J, Zhang H, Huang H, Wang H, Chu PK. Ultrasmall black phosphorus quantum dots: synthesis and use as photothermal agents. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2015 Sep 21;54(39):11526-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201506153
  22. Li M, Wang ZK, Zhuo MP, Hu Y, Hu KH, Ye QQ, Jain SM, Yang YG, Gao XY, Liao LS. Pb–Sn–Cu ternary organometallic halide perovskite solar cells. Advanced Materials. 2018 May;30(20):1800258. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800258
  23. Qiu X, Guo J, Jin Z, Petreto A, Medintz IL, Hildebrandt N. Multiplexed nucleic acid hybridization assays using Single?FRET?Pair distance?tuning. Small. 2017 Jul;13(25):1700332. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201700332
  24. Wei Q, Oribayo O, Feng X, Rempel GL, Pan Q. Synthesis of polyurethane foams loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles and their modification for enhanced performance in oil spill cleanup. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018 Jun 15;57(27):8918-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00864
  25. Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk MI, Krieg F, Caputo R, Hendon CH, Yang RX, Walsh A, Kovalenko MV. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, and I): novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut. Nano letters. 2015 Jun 10;15(6):3692-6.https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5048779
  26. Kovalenko MV, Protesescu L, Bodnarchuk MI. Properties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Science. 2017 Nov 10;358(6364):745-50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7093
  27. Schirhagl R, Chang K, Loretz M, Degen CL. Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology. Annual review of physical chemistry. 2014 Apr 1;65(1):83-105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103659
  28. Degen CL, Reinhard F, Cappellaro P. Quantum sensing. Reviews of modern physics. 2017 Jul 1;89(3):035002.https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002
  29. Le Sage D, Arai K, Glenn DR, DeVience SJ, Pham LM, Rahn-Lee L, Lukin MD, Yacoby A, Komeili A, Walsworth RL. Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):486-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12072
  30. Barry JF, Turner MJ, Schloss JM, Glenn DR, Song Y, Lukin MD, Park H, Walsworth RL. Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):14133-8 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601513113
  31. Wu J, Wang X, Wang Q, Lou Z, Li S, Zhu Y, Qin L, Wei H. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chemical Society Reviews. 2019;48(4):1004-76.https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00457A
  32. Feng Y, Wang D, Wang Z, Kang H. Research trend on quantum dots for tumor diagnosis and therapy: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2025 Dec 1;111(12):9606-21.
  33. Medintz IL, Mattoussi H, Clapp AR. Potential clinical applications of quantum dots. International journal of nanomedicine. 2008 Dec 1;3(2):151-67. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S2659
  34. Kunachowicz D, K?osowska K, Sobczak N, Kepinska M. Applicability of quantum dots in breast cancer diagnostic and therapeutic modalities—a state-of-the-art review. Nanomaterials. 2024 Aug 31;14(17):1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171424
  35. Poole EC. Polyvalent Glycan–Nanomaterials as Structural and Mechanistic Probes for Viral Receptor Proteins DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
  36. Martins CS, LaGrow AP, Prior JA. Quantum dots for cancer-related miRNA monitoring. Acs Sensors. 2022 Apr 29;7(5):1269-99. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c02690
  37. Ratre P, Thareja S, Mishra PK. Quantum Dots-Based Protocols for the Detection of RNAs. InRNA Amplification and Analysis: Methods and Protocols 2024 Jun 23 (pp. 157-173). New York, NY: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4220-8_10
  38. Das S, Saha B, Tiwari M, Tiwari DK. Diagnosis of cancer using carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors.Sensors&Diagnostics. 2023;2(2):268-89.  https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SD00017C
  39. Wegner KD, Hildebrandt N. Quantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(14):4792-834. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00532E
  40. Wang G, Li Z, Ma N. Next-generation DNA-functionalized quantum dots as biological sensors. ACS chemical biology. 2017 Dec 19;13(7):1705-13. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00217
  41. Petrovic S, Bita B, Barbinta-Patrascu ME. Nanoformulations in pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: green perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 May 27;25(11):5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115842
  42. Xing Y, Rao J. Quantum dot bioconjugates for in vitro diagnostics & in vivo imaging. Cancer Biomarkers. 2008 Nov;4(6):307-19. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2008-46-405
  43. Agbeno EK. Quantum Dot Biosensors for Real-Time Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA: Revolutionizing Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis Through Liquid Biopsy. Journal of Integrated Research. 2025 Nov 3:59-96.
  44. Das J, Kelley SO. High?performance nucleic acid sensors for liquid biopsy applications. Angewandte Chemie. 2020 Feb 10;132(7):2574-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201909324
  45. Su J, Kong Z, Zeng L, Kong F, Xia K, Shi F, Du J. Fluorescent Nanodiamonds for Quantum Sensing in Biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. 2025 May;17(3):e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.70012
  46. Wang X, Sang D, Zou L, Ge S, Yao Y, Fan J, Wang Q. Multiple bioimaging applications based on the excellent properties of nanodiamond: a review. Molecules. 2023 May 12;28(10):4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104063
  47. Dhariwal R, Jain M, Mir YR, Singh A, Jain B, Kumar P, Tariq M, Verma D, Deshmukh K, Yadav VK, Malik T. Targeted drug delivery in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of nanotechnology. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025 Jan 29;12:1522223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1522223
  48. Ismail Y, Kishore S. Recent Advances in Targeted Drug Delivery Systems. Journal of Pharma Insights and Research. 2025 Apr 5;3(2):031-42.
  49. Wang M, Liu H, Huang J, Cai T, Xu ZP, Zhang L. Advancing cancer gene therapy: the emerging role of nanoparticle delivery systems. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2025 May 20;23(1):362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-025-02857-z
  50. Seijas A, Cora D, Novo M, Al-Soufi W, Sánchez L, Arana ÁJ. CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems to Enhance Gene Editing Efficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025 May 6;26(9):4420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms260904420
  51. El-Sadek MZ, El-Aziz MK, Shaaban AH, Mostafa SA, Wadan AH. Advancements and emerging trends in photodynamic therapy: Innovations in cancer treatment and beyond. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2025 Aug;24(8):1489-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-025-00630-0
  52. Zhao YY, Lu L, Jeong H, Kim H, Li X, Zhang H, Yoon J. Enhancing biosafety in photodynamic therapy: progress and perspectives. Chemical Society Reviews. 2025;54(17):7749-68. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CS00332A
  53. ChenLiu Z, Gu C, Wang L, Wu Q, Tang D. Nanocarrier-mediated photothermal therapy and its combined strategies: mechanism exploration and application in tumour treatment. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2025 Dec;16(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-025-00268-0
  54. Koç MM, Paksu U, Kurnaz Yetim N, Co?kun B, Hasano?lu Özkan E, Erkovan M. Nanoparticles in photothermal therapy-based medical and theranostic applications: an extensive review. The European Physical Journal Plus. 2025 Jun 10;140(6):514. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-05516-3
  55. Obalola AA, Abrahamse H, Kumar SS. Recent advances in gold nanoparticle-based targeted photodynamic and photothermal cancer therapy. Nanoscale advances. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NA00450A
  56. Omidian H, Dey Chowdhury S. Advances in photothermal and photodynamic nanotheranostics for precision cancer treatment. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2024 Dec 13;5(4):228-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jnt5040018
  57. Hickson SM, Ledger EL, Wells TJ. Emerging antimicrobial therapies for Gram-negative infections in human clinical use. npj Antimicrobials and Resistance. 2025 Feb 27;3(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-025-00056-5
  58. Xu Y, Zhang F, Zhu K, Liu Y, Wang X, Ma Y. Novel antimicrobial strategies against infections. AIMS Bioengineering. 2025;12(1):22-49. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2025002
  59. Oldan JD, Solnes LB, Chin BB, Rowe SP. A Look to the Future: Potential Theranostic Applications in Head and Neck Tumors. Cancers. 2025 Feb 19;17(4):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040695
  60. Watabe T, Hirata K, Iima M, Yanagawa M, Saida T, Sakata A, Ide S, Honda M, Kurokawa R, Nishioka K, Kawamura M. Recent advances in theranostics and oncology PET: emerging radionuclides and targets. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2025 Sep;39(9):909-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02061-y
  61. Salvi A, Kharbanda S, Thakur P, Shandilya M, Thakur A. Biomedical application of carbon quantum dots: a review. Carbon Trends. 2024 Dec 1;17:100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100407
  62. Le N, Kim K. Current advances in the biomedical applications of quantum dots: promises and challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023 Aug 11;24(16):12682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612682
  63. Bhise MR, Trivedi V, Devi S, Tripathi AK, Kumar J, Katta S, Raval AV, Shamim S, Kumar R, Kumar P. Graphene Quantum Dots in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics: Advances in Biosensing, Imaging, and Treatment Applications. Current Medical Science. 2026 Jan 8:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-025-3232-3
  64. Xu G, Zeng S, Zhang B, Swihart MT, Yong KT, Prasad PN. New generation cadmium-free quantum dots for biophotonics and nanomedicine. Chemical reviews. 2016 Oct 12;116(19):12234-327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00143
  65. Derfus AM, Chan WC, Bhatia SN. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano letters. 2004 Jan 14;4(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0347334
  66. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environmental health perspectives. 2005 Sep 20;114(2):165. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8284
  67. Teleanu DM, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, Teleanu RI. Neurotoxicity of nanomaterials: An up-to-date overview. Nanomaterials. 2019 Jan 13;9(1):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010096
  68. Chen, Z., Manian, A., Widmer?Cooper, A., Russo, S., & Mulvaney, P., 2025. Semiconductor Quantum Dots in the Cluster Regime.. Chemical reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00967.
  69. Thureja, D., Imamo?lu, A., Smole?ski, T., Amelio, I., Popert, A., Chervy, T., Lu, X., Liu, S., Barmak, K., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Norris, D., Kroner, M., & Murthy, P., 2022. Electrically tunable quantum confinement of neutral excitons. Nature, 606, pp. 298 - 304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04634-z.
  70. Pereira, C., & Silva, E., 2025. Nonlinear optical behavior of confined electrons under torsion and magnetic fields. .

Reference

  1. Patil B, Lad M, Sharma P, Santani N, Rajpal M, Shaikh S. Revolutionizing Alzheimer’s Diagnosis using Quantum Computing. In2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) 2024 Apr 24 (pp. 479-485).
  2. Malik S, Muhammad K, Waheed Y. Emerging applications of nanotechnology in healthcare andmedicine.Molecules. 202Jan;28(18):6624. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186624
  3. Chow JC. Quantum computing in medicine. Medical Sciences. 2024 Nov 17;12(4):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12040067
  4. Jin C, Wang K, Oppong-Gyebi A, Hu J. Application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and therapy-a mini-review. International journal of medical sciences. 2020 Oct 18;17(18):2964.https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.49801
  5. Wang B, Hu S, Teng Y, Chen J, Wang H, Xu Y, Wang K, Xu J, Cheng Y, Gao X. Current advance of nanotechnology in diagnosis and treatment for malignant tumors. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2024 Aug 12;9(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01773-0
  6. Bruchez Jr M, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2013-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5385.2013
  7. Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose SJ, Li JJ, Sundaresan G, Wu AM, Gambhir SS, Weiss S. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):538-44.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104274
  8. Smith AM, Nie S. Next-generation quantum dots. Nature biotechnology. 2009 Aug;27(8):732-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0809-732
  9. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors Environ Health Perspect 114: 165–172. Find this article online. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8284
  10. Yong KT, Ding H, Roy I, Law WC, Bergey EJ, Maitra A, Prasad PN. Imaging pancreatic cancer using bioconjugated InP quantum dots. ACS nano. 2009 Mar 24;3(3):502-10. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn8008933
  11. Baker SN, Baker GA. Luminescent carbon nanodots: emergent nanolights. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010 Sep 10;49(38):6726-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200906623
  12. Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(1):362-81. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00269E
  13. Wang X, Xie X, Li Z, Zhang X, Yang B, Kang H, Yung PS, Gao Z, Wong SH, Bian L, Zhang K. Catalysis-mediated dynamic ligand presentation regulates mechanosensing–metabolism coupling of stem cells. Nano Today. 2024 Aug 1;57:102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102363
  14. Chen X, Zhan W, Duan H, Su Y, Li X, Jiang H, Xiong Y, Tang BZ, Huang X. Crescent-shaped Janus nanoassemblies of gold nanoparticles and AIEgens: Enhancing plasmonic and fluorescent activities for colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescence lateral flow immunoassay.NanoToday.2024Oct1;58:102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102452
  15. Wang H, Bi J, Zhu BW, Tan M. Multicolorful carbon dots for tumor theranostics. Current MedicinalChemistry.2018Aug1;25(25):2894-909. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666171229144421
  16. Sun X, Liu Z, Welsher K, Robinson JT, Goodwin A, Zaric S, Dai H. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano research. 2008 Sep;1(3):203-12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8
  17. Zhu S, Tang S, Zhang J, Yang B. Control the size and surface chemistry of graphene for the rising fluorescent materials. Chemical communications. 2012;48(38):4527-39. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc30404d
  18. Jena N, Rawat A, Ahammed R, Mohanta MK, De Sarkar A. Emergence of high piezoelectricity along with robust electron mobility in Janus structures in semiconducting Group IVB dichalcogenide monolayers. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2018;6(48):24885-98.https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA08222H
  19. Li X, Li T, Liu B, Hu N, Hu T, Ni Z. Boosting the performance of an iontophoretic biosensing system with a graphene aerogel and Prussian blue for highly sensitive and noninvasive glucose monitoring. Analyst. 2023;148(14):3184-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN00498B
  20. Alrbyawi H, Poudel I, Annaji M, Arnold RD, Tiwari AK, Babu RJ. Recent advancements of stimuli-responsive targeted liposomal formulations for cancer drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2022 Feb 1;10(1):3-23. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738509666210608144804
  21. Sun Z, Xie H, Tang S, Yu XF, Guo Z, Shao J, Zhang H, Huang H, Wang H, Chu PK. Ultrasmall black phosphorus quantum dots: synthesis and use as photothermal agents. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2015 Sep 21;54(39):11526-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201506153
  22. Li M, Wang ZK, Zhuo MP, Hu Y, Hu KH, Ye QQ, Jain SM, Yang YG, Gao XY, Liao LS. Pb–Sn–Cu ternary organometallic halide perovskite solar cells. Advanced Materials. 2018 May;30(20):1800258. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800258
  23. Qiu X, Guo J, Jin Z, Petreto A, Medintz IL, Hildebrandt N. Multiplexed nucleic acid hybridization assays using Single?FRET?Pair distance?tuning. Small. 2017 Jul;13(25):1700332. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201700332
  24. Wei Q, Oribayo O, Feng X, Rempel GL, Pan Q. Synthesis of polyurethane foams loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles and their modification for enhanced performance in oil spill cleanup. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018 Jun 15;57(27):8918-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00864
  25. Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk MI, Krieg F, Caputo R, Hendon CH, Yang RX, Walsh A, Kovalenko MV. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, and I): novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut. Nano letters. 2015 Jun 10;15(6):3692-6.https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5048779
  26. Kovalenko MV, Protesescu L, Bodnarchuk MI. Properties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Science. 2017 Nov 10;358(6364):745-50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7093
  27. Schirhagl R, Chang K, Loretz M, Degen CL. Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology. Annual review of physical chemistry. 2014 Apr 1;65(1):83-105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103659
  28. Degen CL, Reinhard F, Cappellaro P. Quantum sensing. Reviews of modern physics. 2017 Jul 1;89(3):035002.https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002
  29. Le Sage D, Arai K, Glenn DR, DeVience SJ, Pham LM, Rahn-Lee L, Lukin MD, Yacoby A, Komeili A, Walsworth RL. Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):486-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12072
  30. Barry JF, Turner MJ, Schloss JM, Glenn DR, Song Y, Lukin MD, Park H, Walsworth RL. Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):14133-8 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601513113
  31. Wu J, Wang X, Wang Q, Lou Z, Li S, Zhu Y, Qin L, Wei H. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chemical Society Reviews. 2019;48(4):1004-76.https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00457A
  32. Feng Y, Wang D, Wang Z, Kang H. Research trend on quantum dots for tumor diagnosis and therapy: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2025 Dec 1;111(12):9606-21.
  33. Medintz IL, Mattoussi H, Clapp AR. Potential clinical applications of quantum dots. International journal of nanomedicine. 2008 Dec 1;3(2):151-67. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S2659
  34. Kunachowicz D, K?osowska K, Sobczak N, Kepinska M. Applicability of quantum dots in breast cancer diagnostic and therapeutic modalities—a state-of-the-art review. Nanomaterials. 2024 Aug 31;14(17):1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171424
  35. Poole EC. Polyvalent Glycan–Nanomaterials as Structural and Mechanistic Probes for Viral Receptor Proteins DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
  36. Martins CS, LaGrow AP, Prior JA. Quantum dots for cancer-related miRNA monitoring. Acs Sensors. 2022 Apr 29;7(5):1269-99. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c02690
  37. Ratre P, Thareja S, Mishra PK. Quantum Dots-Based Protocols for the Detection of RNAs. InRNA Amplification and Analysis: Methods and Protocols 2024 Jun 23 (pp. 157-173). New York, NY: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4220-8_10
  38. Das S, Saha B, Tiwari M, Tiwari DK. Diagnosis of cancer using carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors.Sensors&Diagnostics. 2023;2(2):268-89.  https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SD00017C
  39. Wegner KD, Hildebrandt N. Quantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(14):4792-834. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00532E
  40. Wang G, Li Z, Ma N. Next-generation DNA-functionalized quantum dots as biological sensors. ACS chemical biology. 2017 Dec 19;13(7):1705-13. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00217
  41. Petrovic S, Bita B, Barbinta-Patrascu ME. Nanoformulations in pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: green perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024 May 27;25(11):5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115842
  42. Xing Y, Rao J. Quantum dot bioconjugates for in vitro diagnostics & in vivo imaging. Cancer Biomarkers. 2008 Nov;4(6):307-19. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2008-46-405
  43. Agbeno EK. Quantum Dot Biosensors for Real-Time Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA: Revolutionizing Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis Through Liquid Biopsy. Journal of Integrated Research. 2025 Nov 3:59-96.
  44. Das J, Kelley SO. High?performance nucleic acid sensors for liquid biopsy applications. Angewandte Chemie. 2020 Feb 10;132(7):2574-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201909324
  45. Su J, Kong Z, Zeng L, Kong F, Xia K, Shi F, Du J. Fluorescent Nanodiamonds for Quantum Sensing in Biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. 2025 May;17(3):e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.70012
  46. Wang X, Sang D, Zou L, Ge S, Yao Y, Fan J, Wang Q. Multiple bioimaging applications based on the excellent properties of nanodiamond: a review. Molecules. 2023 May 12;28(10):4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104063
  47. Dhariwal R, Jain M, Mir YR, Singh A, Jain B, Kumar P, Tariq M, Verma D, Deshmukh K, Yadav VK, Malik T. Targeted drug delivery in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of nanotechnology. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025 Jan 29;12:1522223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1522223
  48. Ismail Y, Kishore S. Recent Advances in Targeted Drug Delivery Systems. Journal of Pharma Insights and Research. 2025 Apr 5;3(2):031-42.
  49. Wang M, Liu H, Huang J, Cai T, Xu ZP, Zhang L. Advancing cancer gene therapy: the emerging role of nanoparticle delivery systems. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2025 May 20;23(1):362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-025-02857-z
  50. Seijas A, Cora D, Novo M, Al-Soufi W, Sánchez L, Arana ÁJ. CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems to Enhance Gene Editing Efficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025 May 6;26(9):4420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms260904420
  51. El-Sadek MZ, El-Aziz MK, Shaaban AH, Mostafa SA, Wadan AH. Advancements and emerging trends in photodynamic therapy: Innovations in cancer treatment and beyond. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2025 Aug;24(8):1489-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-025-00630-0
  52. Zhao YY, Lu L, Jeong H, Kim H, Li X, Zhang H, Yoon J. Enhancing biosafety in photodynamic therapy: progress and perspectives. Chemical Society Reviews. 2025;54(17):7749-68. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CS00332A
  53. ChenLiu Z, Gu C, Wang L, Wu Q, Tang D. Nanocarrier-mediated photothermal therapy and its combined strategies: mechanism exploration and application in tumour treatment. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2025 Dec;16(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-025-00268-0
  54. Koç MM, Paksu U, Kurnaz Yetim N, Co?kun B, Hasano?lu Özkan E, Erkovan M. Nanoparticles in photothermal therapy-based medical and theranostic applications: an extensive review. The European Physical Journal Plus. 2025 Jun 10;140(6):514. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-05516-3
  55. Obalola AA, Abrahamse H, Kumar SS. Recent advances in gold nanoparticle-based targeted photodynamic and photothermal cancer therapy. Nanoscale advances. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NA00450A
  56. Omidian H, Dey Chowdhury S. Advances in photothermal and photodynamic nanotheranostics for precision cancer treatment. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2024 Dec 13;5(4):228-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jnt5040018
  57. Hickson SM, Ledger EL, Wells TJ. Emerging antimicrobial therapies for Gram-negative infections in human clinical use. npj Antimicrobials and Resistance. 2025 Feb 27;3(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-025-00056-5
  58. Xu Y, Zhang F, Zhu K, Liu Y, Wang X, Ma Y. Novel antimicrobial strategies against infections. AIMS Bioengineering. 2025;12(1):22-49. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2025002
  59. Oldan JD, Solnes LB, Chin BB, Rowe SP. A Look to the Future: Potential Theranostic Applications in Head and Neck Tumors. Cancers. 2025 Feb 19;17(4):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040695
  60. Watabe T, Hirata K, Iima M, Yanagawa M, Saida T, Sakata A, Ide S, Honda M, Kurokawa R, Nishioka K, Kawamura M. Recent advances in theranostics and oncology PET: emerging radionuclides and targets. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2025 Sep;39(9):909-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02061-y
  61. Salvi A, Kharbanda S, Thakur P, Shandilya M, Thakur A. Biomedical application of carbon quantum dots: a review. Carbon Trends. 2024 Dec 1;17:100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100407
  62. Le N, Kim K. Current advances in the biomedical applications of quantum dots: promises and challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023 Aug 11;24(16):12682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612682
  63. Bhise MR, Trivedi V, Devi S, Tripathi AK, Kumar J, Katta S, Raval AV, Shamim S, Kumar R, Kumar P. Graphene Quantum Dots in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics: Advances in Biosensing, Imaging, and Treatment Applications. Current Medical Science. 2026 Jan 8:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-025-3232-3
  64. Xu G, Zeng S, Zhang B, Swihart MT, Yong KT, Prasad PN. New generation cadmium-free quantum dots for biophotonics and nanomedicine. Chemical reviews. 2016 Oct 12;116(19):12234-327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00143
  65. Derfus AM, Chan WC, Bhatia SN. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano letters. 2004 Jan 14;4(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0347334
  66. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environmental health perspectives. 2005 Sep 20;114(2):165. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8284
  67. Teleanu DM, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, Teleanu RI. Neurotoxicity of nanomaterials: An up-to-date overview. Nanomaterials. 2019 Jan 13;9(1):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010096
  68. Chen, Z., Manian, A., Widmer?Cooper, A., Russo, S., & Mulvaney, P., 2025. Semiconductor Quantum Dots in the Cluster Regime.. Chemical reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00967.
  69. Thureja, D., Imamo?lu, A., Smole?ski, T., Amelio, I., Popert, A., Chervy, T., Lu, X., Liu, S., Barmak, K., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Norris, D., Kroner, M., & Murthy, P., 2022. Electrically tunable quantum confinement of neutral excitons. Nature, 606, pp. 298 - 304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04634-z.
  70. Pereira, C., & Silva, E., 2025. Nonlinear optical behavior of confined electrons under torsion and magnetic fields. .

Photo
Abhinav Dupare
Corresponding author

Kamla Nehru College Of Pharmacy , Borkhedi Gate , Butibori , Nagpur , India -441108, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India -440033.

Photo
Nitin padole
Co-author

Kamla Nehru College Of Pharmacy , Borkhedi Gate , Butibori , Nagpur , India -441108, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India -440033.

Photo
Nilakshi Dhoble
Co-author

Kamla Nehru College Of Pharmacy , Borkhedi Gate , Butibori , Nagpur , India -441108, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India -440033.Nehru college of pharmacy, Butibori, Nagpur.

Photo
Pankaj dhapke
Co-author

Kamla Nehru College Of Pharmacy , Borkhedi Gate , Butibori , Nagpur , India -441108, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India -440033.

Photo
Jagdish baheti
Co-author

Kamla Nehru College Of Pharmacy , Borkhedi Gate , Butibori , Nagpur , India -441108, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India -440033.

Abhinav Dupare, Nitin Padole , Pankaj Dhapke , Nilakshi Dhoble, Jagdish Baheti, Quantum Dots for Medicine Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 3732-3748, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19703488

More related articles
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overvi...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Preven...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta,...
Hepatotoxicity: Comprehensive Review...
Mahesh Manke , Padmaja Giram, Smita Shirale, Madhuri Shinde, Saba Shaikh...
Comprehensive Review on Cinnamon Essential Oil-Loaded Microcapsules and Their An...
Abhisekh Koiri, Dr. Nidhi Srivastava, Lokendra Kumar Pandey...
Related Articles
Review on Oral Fast Dissolving Film Technology: Materials, Methods...
Radhika D. Holkar, S. J. Dighade, P.G. Patil...
Novel Liquid-Assisted Grinding (LAG) Synthesis and Characterization of Schiff Ba...
Shraddha Chitale, Bhagyshree Jagtap, Sakshi Walunj, Ganesh Vitukade...
The Next Frontier Mucoadhesive and Mucus-Penetrating Nanoparticles: Overcoming t...
Pallavi Bilwe, Ayush Papadkar, Gayatri Badode, Samiksha Sonwal...
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
More related articles
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Prevention of Iron and Vitamin D Def...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta, Himanshu Roy, Sushil Raj, Md Musab...
Microsphere-Based Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview...
Pathlavath Nithin, Dr. K. Anie Vijetha, Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy ...
Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceuticals: An Overview...
Kanmani S, Varshya M, Yashica C, Swetha P...
Awareness Regarding the Role of Diet in the Prevention of Iron and Vitamin D Def...
Md Sayeed Anwar, Abel B., Asad Raza, Khushi Gupta, Supriya Mehta, Himanshu Roy, Sushil Raj, Md Musab...